[Bug 2068738] Re: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs
Ditto @linmanfu: Operating System: Kubuntu 22.04 KDE Plasma Version: 5.24.7 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.92.0 Qt Version: 5.15.3 Kernel Version: 5.15.0-107-generic (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 8 × AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx Memory: 13.6 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics ** Attachment added: "log.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068738/+attachment/5787785/+files/log.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068738 Title: Kernel update 5.15.0-112 might cause severe problems with specific AMD GPUs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068738/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853369] Re: [19.10] Boot hangs at "loading initial ramdisk"
Have been facing this issue* since updating to 20.04 *stuck at boot. And when booting from recovery seeing "Loading initial ramdisk" on XPS 13 (DELL) the solution has been disabling SGX (Intel's Software Guard Extensions (SGX)) on the bios. After that managed to boot normally. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853369 Title: [19.10] Boot hangs at "loading initial ramdisk" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1853369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316830] Re: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak
Sorry for spamming, but I found that above solution is not 100% perfect: It causes warnings in proftpd.log. Instead of removing /var/log/wtmp better write the following directive in /etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf: WtmpLog off -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316830 Title: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1316830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316830] Re: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak
Apparently, wtmp just keeps a log of _all_ logins. Removing that file disables this logging (I have it in proftpd.log anyways) and solved my problem! rm /var/log/wtmp >From man wtmp: The wtmp file records all logins and logouts. (...) wtmp is maintained by login(1), init(8), and some versions of getty(8) (e.g., mingetty(8) or agetty(8)). None of these programs creates the file, so if it is removed, record-keeping is turned off. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316830 Title: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1316830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1316830] Re: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak
Same here, this time on Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u1 with kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64. I know this is an Ubuntu forum, but this bug ticket is the closest one for this issue that I could find. Package accountsservice has version 0.6.37-3+b1. This machine is running ProFTPd 1.3.5 with a high number of FTP sessions. As you can see the wtmp file gets rather large: -rw--- 1 root utmp 3072 Jul 14 09:53 btmp -rw--- 1 root utmp 44259072 Jul 17 16:07 wtmp -rw--- 1 root utmp 119944320 Jul 17 07:49 wtmp.1 -rw--- 1 root utmp 120503424 Jul 16 07:35 wtmp.2 -rw--- 1 root utmp 120549888 Jul 15 07:35 wtmp.3 This is probably the reason why accounts-daemon is eating away most of by CPU: PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 587 root 20 0 481984 98616 2520 R 73.5 9.6 1204:19 accounts-daemon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316830 Title: /usr/lib/accountsservice/accounts-daemon :: memory and CPU time leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1316830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1698272] [NEW] Long black screen wait time on startup.
Public bug reported: When running install image of 17.04 or after upgrade to 17.04. I experience 500seconds of black screen before the login screen or the "try ubuntu/install ubuntu" screen (in case of install image). I have a laptop (fujitsu t-900) that has a serial watcom penable touchscreen. after many searches I have found the problem. in xserver-xorg-core package. The timeout nolonger is in microseconds but in miliseconds. However in posix_tty.c. This has not been modified and the wacom driver is waiting 500 sedonds insead of 0.5 seconds for some discovery. Here is the patch that actually resolves the problem: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/158520/ ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698272 Title: Long black screen wait time on startup. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1698272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1689751] [NEW] lightdm takes 500 seconds to start
Public bug reported: On ubuntu 17.04 In the live CD and on an upgraded system (upgraded from 16.10). On boot and on logout or switch user. lightdm takes 500seconds (roughly) to start. This is on a fujitsu lifebook t-900 with i5 and 4GB RAM. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04 Package: lightdm 1.22.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-20.22-generic 4.10.8 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-20-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7 Date: Wed May 10 09:25:11 2017 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-01-26 (103 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Release i386 (20161012.2) SourcePackage: lightdm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689751 Title: lightdm takes 500 seconds to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1689751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1673934] Re: when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly
Sure, here you go. The first picture is with gsfonts package installed, the second (in which you can actually read the page) is with gsfonts package removed. ** Attachment added: "screenshot20170320_193744013.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1673934/+attachment/4841094/+files/screenshot20170320_193744013.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673934 Title: when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1673934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1673934] Re: when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly
This is the second good render with the gsfonst package uninstalled. ** Attachment added: "screenshot20170320_193924073.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1673934/+attachment/4841095/+files/screenshot20170320_193924073.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673934 Title: when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1673934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1673934] [NEW] when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly
Public bug reported: In ubuntu touch OTA15 on a meizu pro5. After installing gsfonts package. Meaning that you make the root readwrite and run: sudo apt-get install gsfont. At least some pages will render badly: the numbers are rendered as bubbles and there are no spaces between words. example:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitive_power_supply ** Affects: webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673934 Title: when gsfonts is installed the browser will render the pages badly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webbrowser-app/+bug/1673934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1651210] [NEW] If the name in manifest has uppercase letters the package is not installed correctly
Public bug reported:
When you have upper-case letters in the name of the application the manifest
file after install has wrong name, without upper-case. This creates an invalid
installation. And the problem is not reported until you actually want to use
the package.
Take this manifest.json as example:
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ cat manifest.json
{
"architecture": "all",
"description": "Electrict resistor color code calculator",
"framework": "ubuntu-sdk-15.04",
"hooks": {
"resistor-calculator": {
"apparmor": "Resistor.apparmor",
"desktop": "Resistor.desktop"
}
},
"maintainer": "me",
"name": "com.edi.ResistorCalculator",
"title": "Resistor Calculator",
"version": "0.9"
}
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ click build .
Successfully built package in './com.edi.ResistorCalculator_0.9_all.click'.
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ sudo click install
--user=phablet com.edi.ResistorCalculator_0.9_all.click --allow-unauthenticated
[sudo] password for phablet:
WARNING:root:Signature check failed, but installing anyway as requested
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ click info
com.edi.ResistorCalculator
click_database_error-quark: Failed to parse manifest in
/opt/click.ubuntu.com/com.edi.ResistorCalculator/0.9/.click/info/com.edi.ResistorCalculator.manifest:
Failed to open file
'/opt/click.ubuntu.com/com.edi.ResistorCalculator/0.9/.click/info/com.edi.ResistorCalculator.manifest':
No such file or directory (3)
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ ls
/opt/click.ubuntu.com/com.edi.ResistorCalculator/0.9/.click/info
com.edi.resistorcalculator.list com.edi.resistorcalculator.md5sums format
com.edi.resistorcalculator.manifest com.edi.resistorcalculator.preinst
phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~/tmp/ResistorCalculator$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 15.04
Release:15.04
OTA-14 (directly on my meizu phone).
** Affects: click (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651210
Title:
If the name in manifest has uppercase letters the package is not
installed correctly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click/+bug/1651210/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1613134] Re: wacom touch screen does not recognize finger touch
I have a wacom build-into my fusitsu t-900. I also have experienced the loss of finger input when upgrading to Xenial. However the issue was not the kernel itself, but the fact that on the previous version of ubuntu (15.10) I had to run from my /etc/rc.local: /usr/bin/inputattach --always -w8001 /dev/ttyS4 In order for the wacom to work. Now this actually is messing things up. Now It just works without the inputattach thing. Can you reproduce the bug on a brand new (live dvd) installation? my xinput without the inputattach running. $ xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2[master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointerid=4[slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ PS/2 Generic Mouseid=14 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPadid=15 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Serial Wacom Tablet FUJ02e7 stylusid=16 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Serial Wacom Tablet FUJ02e7 eraserid=17 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Serial Wacom Tablet FUJ02e7 touch id=18 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3[master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5[slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=6[slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Fujitsu FUJ02E3 id=7[slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Video Bus id=8[slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Fujitsu FUJ02B1 id=9[slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Fujitsu FUJ02BF id=10 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=11 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ CNF8248 id=12 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ AT Translated Set 2 keyboard id=13 [slave keyboard (3)] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613134 Title: wacom touch screen does not recognize finger touch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1613134/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1377924] Re: ecryptfs fails to mount (Unable to link the KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING into the KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING)
I have fixed my problem with screen + private by reading this question. http://askubuntu.com/questions/240555/how-to-prevent-ecryptfs-from- umounting-home-if-tmux-is-still-running -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1377924 Title: ecryptfs fails to mount (Unable to link the KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING into the KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1377924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1377924] Re: ecryptfs fails to mount (Unable to link the KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING into the KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING)
Just using ssh is not a solution. I have long running commands (sessions) that need to run in "screen" (tmux) and also need access to files from Private. After the ssh connection closes the Private will unmount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1377924 Title: ecryptfs fails to mount (Unable to link the KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING into the KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1377924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1391111] [NEW] package debhelper 9.20131227ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
Public bug reported: appear during every update of packages ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: debhelper 9.20131227ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-37.64-generic 3.13.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-37-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.5 AptOrdering: linux-firmware: Install debhelper: Configure linux-firmware: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 10 11:48:31 2014 DuplicateSignature: package:debhelper:9.20131227ubuntu1:package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-07-24 (108 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140417) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: debhelper Title: package debhelper 9.20131227ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: debhelper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139 Title: package debhelper 9.20131227ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989687] Re: unable to install ubuntu 12.04 with alternate install on Lenovo X1 notebook
Oh come on! You must be kidding. I've downloaded the stuff. I used SHA256 check on the downloaded image. Then I formatted an USB stick and used USB bootstick creator to create the install media (I used a different stick than first time). When the outer SHA check is ok, the internal must be ok too, because I use it on a USB stick and not a WORM media. Also, the file IS readable, because when I use aptitude to select the dependencies for installation all is ok and I can install the stuff. To answer your question: no, I didn't use the installer's integrity check. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989687 Title: unable to install ubuntu 12.04 with alternate install on Lenovo X1 notebook To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/989687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 598336] Re: error loading vol control applet
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 461123 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461123 Mark, Thank you and sorry about that. Will do in the future. et E. Travis, PMP This e-mail and any attachments to it may contain confidential and proprietary material and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. Any review, use,disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify the sender and destroy this e-mail and any attachments and all copies, whether electronic or printed. From: Mark Lee launchpad-...@lazymalevolence.com To: ponderwo...@yahoo.com Sent: Thu, June 24, 2010 11:37:28 PM Subject: [Bug 598336] Re: error loading vol control applet *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 461123 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461123 Thanks for filing a bug. For future reference, this is a bug against the volume control applet, which is a part of the Awn Extras project. Please file any other bugs that you find against this applet in the Awn Extras bug tracker. ** Project changed: awn = awn-extras ** Changed in: awn-extras Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: awn-extras Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: awn-extras Assignee: (unassigned) = onox (onox) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 461123 IndexError in Volume Control: list index out of range -- error loading vol control applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598336 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- error loading vol control applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu (via bug 461123). -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456173] Re: compiz.real eats all CPU (100%), starting from update 2009.10.18.
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028764/BootDmesg.gz ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028765/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028767/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GconfCompiz.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028768/GconfCompiz.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028769/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028771/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028772/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028773/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028774/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028775/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028776/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028777/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028778/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028779/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028780/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028781/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34028782/monitors.xml.txt -- compiz.real eats all CPU (100%), starting from update 2009.10.18. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456173] [NEW] compiz.real eats all CPU (100%), starting from update 2009.10.18.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz After upgrading my ubuntu beta, at 2009. 10. 18 20:00 GMT+2, I got a new kernel and forced to restart my notebook. After this update, startup went well, but after login everything became dead slow. I've realized, that compiz.real consumes all CPU. If I shut down compiz.real my windows' looses titlebar and it is very unconfortable to use. After manually starting compiz.real, I got a message on the terminal: WARNING: Application calling GLX 1.3 function glXCreatePixmap when GLX 1.3 is not supported! This is an application bug! compiz.real (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format WARNING: Application calling GLX 1.3 function glXDestroyPixmap when GLX 1.3 is not supported! This is an application bug! compiz.real (core) - Error: Couldn't load plugin 'gconf' compiz.real (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format After the last two nightly update the bug did not dissapear, so I decided to report it. My work-notebook is almos unuseable now ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,ccp,dbus,place,mousepoll,gnomecompat,move,resize,decoration,png,svg,imgjpeg,text,neg,video,wall,snap,animation,scale,scaleaddon,expo,staticswitcher,regex,resizeinfo,workarounds,ezoom,vpswitch,extrawm,fade,session,shift,wobbly] Date: Tue Oct 20 11:20:44 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 MachineType: LENOVO 405718G Package: compiz 1:0.8.4-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: all PciDisplay: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic root=UUID=7bf5f87f-a9a3-4c43-b651-07c12506ec27 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1ubuntu4 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2 xserver-xorg-video-ati N/A SourcePackage: compiz Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64 XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] Nincs ilyen fájl vagy könyvtár: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' dmi.bios.date: 05/15/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 6EET41WW (3.01 ) dmi.board.name: 405718G dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr6EET41WW(3.01):bd05/15/2009:svnLENOVO:pn405718G:pvrThinkPadX301:rvnLENOVO:rn405718G:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 405718G dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X301 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = x86_64, kernel = 2.6.31-14-generic ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- compiz.real eats all CPU (100%), starting from update 2009.10.18. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 230354] Re: Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 291594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291594 It must be a kernal bug as it was working fine in Hardy. I guess it'll have to wait till Jaunty or you'll need to roll back to Hardy. There is a work around I used to restore my Volume and Mute keys by mapping them to keys on the numeric keypad (+ - and *) since most people rarely use them. E. Travis, PMP See my profile at LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/etravis From: Daniel Goldsmith goldsmitha...@gmail.com To: ponderwo...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:13:17 PM Subject: [Bug 230354] Re: Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0 *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 291594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291594 Hi guys, the multimedia keys bug has already been reported: it's bug #281993. I think they said it's been fixed in Jaunty... but apparently it's a kernel bug. Thanks, :-Daniel -- Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230354 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230354] Re: Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0
I am also having this problem. Same keyboard, same issue. I am using the AMD64 release. If it would be a help, I have attached the lspci output. Thanks! ** Attachment added: lspci-et.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19848053/lspci-et.txt -- Microsoft Wireless Laser Keyboard 6000 v2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 144937] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 144326 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144326 Ok, thanks for the information. I love Gutsy otherwise. Is there some idea of what is causing this or any workaround? et Aurel Branzeanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 144326 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144326 On my Gutsy Firefox is crashing permanently after some minutes of work. -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144937 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144937] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 144326 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144326 My Firefox on gutsy crashed as I was starting it up. I did not have anything else running at the time. -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121125] Nvidia display driver problem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kubuntu-desktop The problem happens with Kubuntu 7.04 (both i386 and AMD64version), did not see the problem with Kunbuntu 6.10 (i386). Installed softwares include: Automatix, Nvidia drivers... The following is the detail of generated text: (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 47793679681264 (LWP 6790)] (no debugging symbols found) ... [KCrash handler] #5 0x2b77da042a45 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 #6 0x2b77da042b68 in XRRGetScreenInfo () from /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 #7 0x2b77df26eb4f in ?? () from /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/ixf86misc.so #8 0x004885fd in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #9 0x00488951 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #10 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #11 0x004d3ba8 in ?? () #12 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #13 0x0041e37d in ?? () #14 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #15 0x0045a018 in ?? () #16 0x0045cf12 in ?? () #17 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #18 0x00484360 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #19 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #20 0x004d3ba8 in ?? () #21 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #22 0x0041e37d in ?? () #23 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #24 0x0045a018 in ?? () #25 0x0045cf12 in ?? () #26 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #27 0x00484360 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #28 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #29 0x004d3ba8 in ?? () #30 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #31 0x0041e37d in ?? () #32 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #33 0x00481052 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () #34 0x00421e06 in PyInstance_New () #35 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #36 0x00484360 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #37 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #38 0x004d3ba8 in ?? () #39 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #40 0x0041e37d in ?? () #41 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #42 0x0045a018 in ?? () #43 0x0045cf12 in ?? () #44 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #45 0x00484360 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #46 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #47 0x004d3ba8 in ?? () #48 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #49 0x0041e37d in ?? () #50 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #51 0x0045a018 in ?? () #52 0x0045cf12 in ?? () #53 0x00417be3 in PyObject_Call () #54 0x00484360 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () #55 0x004895da in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () #56 0x00489622 in PyEval_EvalCode () #57 0x004aad1e in PyRun_FileExFlags () #58 0x004aafb0 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags () #59 0x004146b5 in Py_Main () #60 0x2b77d51988e4 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #61 0x00413bf9 in _start () ** Affects: kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Nvidia display driver problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kubuntu-meta in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92943] Installer crashed
Public bug reported: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/ubiquity, line 166, in ? main() File /usr/bin/ubiquity, line 161, in main install(sys.argv[1]) File /usr/bin/ubiquity, line 57, in install ret = wizard.run() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py, line 305, in run self.process_step() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py, line 856, in process_step self.progress_loop() File /usr/lib/ubiquity/ubiquity/frontend/gtkui.py, line 628, in progress_loop raise RuntimeError, (Install failed with exit code %s\n%s % RuntimeError: Install failed with exit code 1 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/ubiquity/install.py, line 1404, in ? install.run() File /usr/share/ubiquity/install.py, line 385, in run self.configure_bootloader() File /usr/share/ubiquity/install.py, line 1163, in configure_bootloader raise InstallStepError( InstallStepError: GrubInstaller failed with code 127 ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Installer crashed https://launchpad.net/bugs/92943 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
