[Bug 383999] Re: no JACK support
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - no JACK support + no JACK support in Bristol -- no JACK support in Bristol https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374101] Re: Brasero hangs at Normalizing tracks
Running a fully up to date Karmic and my Brasero hung at 'Normalizing tracks' for over an hour. I didn't research the cause, but it looks like this bug is NOT fixed. Can anyone on Karmic confirm this? -- Brasero hangs at Normalizing tracks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286621] Re: [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'
subtitleeditor is now in the Lucid ubuntustudio-video meta. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480988] [NEW] Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center When doing a search for 'video editor' in Ubuntu Software Center, one of the most (if not the most) powerful and stable video editors in Ubuntu does not appear. Please add 'video editor' as a tag for the Blender package in the Software Center. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Blender is not listed as a video editor when searching for a video editor + Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor -- Blender is not listed when searching for a video editor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221954] Re: Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Studio-dev (ubuntustudio-dev) => Eric Hedekar (stochastic) (stochastic) -- Gcdmaster is not in the right place once ubuntustudio-menu is installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221954 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246894] Re: [needs packaging] FFADO & FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers
Since neither Feisty nor Gutsy are supported archives, I'm switching this bug to "invalid" for those backport request (effectively archiving this bug). ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: Incomplete => Invalid ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- [needs packaging] FFADO & FreeBob - Firewire Mixer Audio Drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246894 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286621] Re: [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor'
Luke I notice this was supposed to be "added for jaunty" but it's yet to be added to the ubuntustudio-video meta. Is there any reason beyond forgetting? I'll happily make the change as I feel this program is very useful for the independent video artist. -- [dependancies] 'ubuntustudio-video' should install 'subtitleeditor' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164719] Re: muse sequencer -new version
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #09 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09 ** Changed in: muse (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: muse (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: muse (Debian) Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #09 -- muse sequencer -new version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479688] Re: Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 164719 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164719 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 164719 muse sequencer -new version -- Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479688] Re: Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #09 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09 ** Also affects: muse (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=09 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479688] [NEW] Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: muse The current version of Muse in the Ubuntu repositories is getting quite out of date. An upgrade is required. http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmuse/ ** Affects: muse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgrade muse to 1.0rc3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479688 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2894009 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2894009 ** Also affects: lmuse via http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2894009 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479662] Re: muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install
hmm, Muse starts just fine on 32bit Ubuntu Studio Karmic. The bug you posted from Arch linux is also a 64bit bug. -- muse fails to launch in fresh ubuntustudio install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 479156] Re: gnome-app-install instead of ubuntu-software-center
This has just been fixed upstream in Bzr for this package. Attached is the debdiff. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-menu (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Attachment added: "ubuntustudio-menu_0.12ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35436515/ubuntustudio-menu_0.12ubuntu2.debdiff -- gnome-app-install instead of ubuntu-software-center https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157861] Re: [needs-packaging] OpenLibraries
This bug is now two years old. Andrew, are you planning on updating the revu package to Lucid? These libraries are still an active project. ** Description changed: This is a statement of an intent to package OpenLibraries for Ubuntu. It will start with the base packaging already done by the debian- multimedia. + + Homepage: http://openlibraries.org/ + License: GPL 2 -- [needs-packaging] OpenLibraries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157861 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475853] [NEW] [needs-packaging] NASPRO plugin bridge
Public bug reported: Website: http://confluence.atheme.org/display/NA/NASPRO License: BSD Info: NASPRO, recursive acronym for "NASPRO Architecture for Sound PROcessing", is a free/open source, modular and cross-platform software architecture to perform sound processing with a strong emphasys on interoperability. Its main aim is to provide users and developers a set of full-featured tools to do sound manipulation using heterogeneous technologies which are already available (such as LADSPA or LV2) and at the same time make it easy to develop new ones without breaking interoperability. The implementation which is currently being developed is made of: * an helper library to write bridging plugins to LV2 from other plugin systems; * a bunch of from--to-LV2 bridging plugins. The plan is to also develop LV2-based tools to perform sound synthesis and manipulation, plugin development and DSP algorithm research. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] NASPRO plugin bridge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 469907] Re: please backport CELT for Hardy
** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please backport CELT for Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409067] Re: package hdparm 9.15-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurueck
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- package hdparm 9.15-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurueck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409067 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459598] [NEW] Mixxx needs a patch for 2.6.31 kernels to work with Hercules DJ console
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mixxx According to this forum post on the Mixxx website: http://www.mixxx.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=851&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a Karmic's 2.6.31 kernel needs a patch for the Hercules DJ console to work. The patch is attached there. ** Affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mixxx Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mixxx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: mixxx Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Mixxx needs a patch for 2.6.31 kernels to work with Hercules DJ console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf
My mistake, it is infact removed entirely from the current Karmic repositories. A manual install of the Jaunty .deb file will fix it though. That .deb file is available here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/all/ttf-bitstream-vera/download -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12016] Re: RFE: Replace Bitstream Vera with DejaVu
Why was this package removed from the repositories without even a transitional package put in its place? Many programs still depend upon ttf-bitstream-vera explicitly. This "fix" has broken many other packages. -- RFE: Replace Bitstream Vera with DejaVu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459330] Re: Missing required font Vera.ttf
For now, an easy workaround is to install the ttf-bitstream-vera font package. I'll work on making a patch that will require this package on install. Upstream has mentioned that they're planning on moving the software to DejaVu since it's much more widely used. -- Missing required font Vera.ttf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455336] [NEW] [upgrade] newer version has been released
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sooperlooper Karmic's package is at version 1.0.8 while the latest release is version 1.6.14 Source available here: http://essej.net/sooperlooper/download.html ** Affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: sooperlooper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [upgrade] newer version has been released https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 455239] [NEW] raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntustudio-controls By writing the raw1394 permission to /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev- default.rules the changes that Ubuntu Studio Controls makes is only temporary. As soon as udev is updated, that file is re-written and the Ubuntu Studio Contros changes are deleted. The deletion of the permissions rule does not appear in the Ubuntu Studio Controls GUI. The correct place for this rule is in a new file in /etc/udev/rules.d/ Files in this folder are not overwritten on udev updates. ** Affects: ubuntustudio-controls (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- raw1394 permissions are only temporarily set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454082] Re: ubuntustudio-controls fails to enable NICE
ttoine, please file a separate bug report for the Memlock problem you've noticed. -- ubuntustudio-controls fails to enable NICE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453524] [NEW] Track fails to load into player
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xwax As soon as a track is loaded into the player (by pressing F1) the track name appears on the player, but the song fails to import. The program also fails to close after this, and needs to be killed manually. The following is the output from the command line after pressing F1: execl: No such file or directory Loading 'ADGG.mp3'. Allocated new track block (1 at 0 bytes). Track memory 8192Kb PCM, 128Kb PPM, 4Kb overview. Track importer exited with status 65280. ** Affects: xwax (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Track fails to load into player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it
Matthias, nope, Bug #416778 is still not fixed. It's in the process of getting fixed (and will likely be fixed early in the Lucid Lynx 10.04 cycle - just speculating). It's also way too late for this bug to get fixed for the Karmic cycle. -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159941] Re: fglrx driver does not work in RT kernel
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => High -- fglrx driver does not work in RT kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362190] Re: xserver-xorg-ati driver + disk encryption + linux-rt prevents xserver start
I have briefly tested this on a VM with Ubuntu Studio Karmic's Beta (32bit version). Unfortunately it's clear that the VM was not happy after reboot, it clearly was loading, but the resolution of the VM screen was very messed (like 1600x400) and GDM did not successfully load. I am still not able to test this on physical hardware, but it's on my list of things to do before Karmic's release. I'm also not sure this bug (if valid) has much impact on Ubuntu Studio as anyone using the RT kernel probably cares more about disk access time, and encryption would just slow that down. -- xserver-xorg-ati driver + disk encryption + linux-rt prevents xserver start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447265] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447267] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410867] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:
>From what I see, the fix is still Committed, but not yet Released. SubliM, what makes it Released? ** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447847] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: post-removal script berria azpiprozesuak 1 errorea eman du irteeran
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: post-removal script berria azpiprozesuak 1 errorea eman du irteeran https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447847 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384519] Re: Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 391834 Crash while loading from Synaptic ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384519 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435713] Re: tried to remove ubuntustudio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- tried to remove ubuntustudio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435713 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384521] Re: Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 391834 Crash while loading from Synaptic ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- Can't install or purge ubuntustudio-default-settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391834] Re: Crash while loading from Synaptic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- Crash while loading from Synaptic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446871] Re: I have caught karmic bug during updating.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ironstorm, that is not the correct way to mark a duplicate bug. This bug IS VALID, it's just a duplicate. To mark a bug as a duplicate, at the upper left of the bug's launchpad page click the "mark as duplicate" link and type the number of the bug which this one duplicates. This way all parties involved in this bug will be notified of changes to the duplicated bug, and developers looking at bug lists will see that the duplicated bug has been experienced and reported multiple times. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- I have caught karmic bug during updating. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410867] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399855] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424702] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446289] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446541] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 447157] Re: package ubuntustudio-default-sett ings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script post-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410867 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410867 package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: -- package ubuntustudio-default-settings 0.26 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus nouveau script post-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 380858] Re: HP printers Media Source selection stopped working after upgrade to 9.04
It looks like this bug has regression on the latest Karmic version. Earlier Karmic alphas were working with the CD/DVD tray on my HP Photosmart D5460 but after some recent updates (within the last month or so), no more CD/DVD tray. -- HP printers Media Source selection stopped working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429311] Re: installing esound requires removing ubuntu-studio-desktop
Bug marked as invalid. Removing the ubuntustudio-desktop package does not remove the dependent packages, the desktop remains functional. The current behavior of removing the meta package when a pulse audio (or other dependency) package is removed is desirable, as otherwise the package would be re-installed as soon as the ubuntustudio-desktop is updated. This would result in a broken package error. -- installing esound requires removing ubuntu-studio-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429311] Re: installing esound requires removing ubuntu-studio-desktop
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- installing esound requires removing ubuntu-studio-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425435] Re: Delta 44 cards not working since upgrade 9.04
If you have sound in Audacity, then it's likely an issue with Pulse Audio that's preventing the rest of the system to have sound. Can you post a screenshot of your sound preferences in Audacity? -- Delta 44 cards not working since upgrade 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390302] Re: ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export
Removed the Needs Packaging tags. Libffado is already packaged. ** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export + ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export ** Tags removed: needs-packaging ** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ffado cause ardour or jack to crash after export https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support
Matthias, Jack getting into main is waiting on two things: 1) Bug #416778 2) Jack dropping the celt dependency (easily taken care of, just waiting on confirmation from jack devs that this will only cause a minor feature in netjack to break). I'd say if you want to help on getting Jack into main, focus on Bug #416778 -- Please compile portaudio with Jack support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416778] Re: [MIR] libffado
It has been ten days now since the discussions were started and the only voices that spoke have been 100% in favor of the inclusion of Jack in Main. Switching this bug to Confirmed. ** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- [MIR] libffado https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128068] Re: [needs-packaging] Xjadeo
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] Xjadeo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412732] Re: gnome-keybinding-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist()
The bug is marked as "fix released" so yes, it has been fixed. Quit commenting that it's been fixed, you're just clogging people's inboxes. -- gnome-keybinding-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414131] Re: Upgrade mixxx to latest release (from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0)
As it sits, we're past Karmic's Feature Freeze deadline (Aug 27), so new versions of mixxx wouldn't get into Karmic unless a Feature Freeze Exception were granted. My hope in filing this bug as soon as I heard Mixxx 1.7.0 was released was to get the upgrade done before the freeze. This bug will likely have to wait until the 10.04 release now, at which time I expect a sync with Debian to be the appropriate action. ** Changed in: mixxx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed -- Upgrade mixxx to latest release (from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173240] Re: [needs-packaging] gollage
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] gollage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415137] Re: Should depend on kdebase-bin not kdebase
** Also affects: frescobaldi (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Should depend on kdebase-bin not kdebase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415137 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418953] Re: Pulseaudio hogs bandwidth
More information is needed for anyone to diagnose/fix this bug. Please explain how you've setup your home server. Also if you could post the appropriate logs of activity on your network, that would be helpful. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Pulseaudio hogs bandwidth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 411962] Re: Pulse audio queues audio and gets locked to the app PID
mac_v can you post the contents of those folders on an account that is experiencing these problems? -- Pulse audio queues audio and gets locked to the app PID https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411962 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268324] Re: [needs-packaging] a2jmidid
** Changed in: a2jmidid Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] a2jmidid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416778] Re: main inclusion request for libffado
I've begun to revive the discussion on Jack entering main. Here are links to the threads: ubuntu-devel https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2009-August/028784.html ubuntu-devel-discuss https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-August/009237.html ubuntu-studio-devel https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2009-August/001873.html Already a number of people have replied with favorable opinions on the matter. Please add your opinion to any of these threads. -- main inclusion request for libffado https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it
Currently relies on Bug #416778 -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407841] Re: Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it
** Description changed: Jack should be put into the Main repository so that other sound servers in Ubuntu can integrate with it. Here are a few related bugs that all depend on this action: Bug #152487 Jack output for xine apps Bug #84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin Bug #109659 jack sink missing in pulseaudio Bug#360590 Please compile portaudio with Jack support + Bug #417987 alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building ** Also affects: libffado (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Jack should be put into the Main repository so that other sound servers in Ubuntu can integrate with it. Here are a few related bugs that all depend on this action: Bug #152487 Jack output for xine apps Bug #84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin Bug #109659 jack sink missing in pulseaudio Bug#360590 Please compile portaudio with Jack support - Bug #417987 alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 One last try: Bug #407841 Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it ** Also affects: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin -- alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 This depends on Jack being included in the Main repositories (Bug #47814) from what I understand of alsa plugins. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Tags added: needs-packaging ** Tags removed: needs-packaging ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed -- alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417987] Re: alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84900 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84900 whoops, that should have read Bug #407814 -- alsa/libasound jack plugin needs building https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
I can confirm that on 32bit Karmic boxes aren't drawn right. It got a little better when I turned compiz off, but not by much. However, I don't honestly believe this minor bug should prevent the package from entering Karmic. Get the package uploaded to REVU as soon as possible (feature freeze is four days away!). -- [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417528] [NEW] [needs-packaging] DiscWrapper a cover designer for homemade discs
Public bug reported: DiscWrapper is a cover designer for homemade discs. It supports standard CD-DVD, slim CD-DVD cases and disc designing. Homepage: http://discwrapper.sourceforge.net/ License: GPLv3 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] DiscWrapper a cover designer for homemade discs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417528 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417456] Re: [needs-packaging] Simple Sysexxer - MIDI memory management system
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] Simple Sysexxer - MIDI memory management system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417456 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417456] [NEW] [needs-packaging] Simple Sysexxer - MIDI memory management system
Public bug reported: Simple Sysexxer is a GUI tool to create backups of the memory contents of MIDI devices. Homepage: http://www.christeck.de/wp/products/simple-sysexxer/ ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] Simple Sysexxer - MIDI memory management system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417456 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249815] Re: [needs-packaging] Qtractor is an Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer
This package is in the repositories and the requested backports are for versions of Ubuntu that no longer have open repositories. Marking all forms of this bug as Invalid. ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- [needs-packaging] Qtractor is an Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 417240] [NEW] [needs-packaging] GunGirl Sequencer for audiofiles
Public bug reported: Gungirl Sequencer is an easy to use Audiosequencer. It includes a simple Filemanager and uses Drag & Drop to arrange Audiosamples. Homepage: http://ggseq.sourceforge.net/HomePage ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] GunGirl Sequencer for audiofiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417240 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226288] Re: Crashes on wet/dry adjustment
I was unable to reproduce this behavior in 9.10 testing a number of plugins. I wasn't able to find a Spectrograph plugin, but all the amplifier plugins I tried (did not use any that gave the "Plugin not RT capable" warning though). Marking this bug as Incomplete for now as it's unclear which plugins cause the reported behavior. Please clarify this bug further. ** Changed in: jack-rack (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Crashes on wet/dry adjustment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249856] Re: Error on string "Text Edtior"
** Changed in: denemo (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Error on string "Text Edtior" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412908] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver
New version of RT kernel (2.6.31-2) package fixes the previous issues. Marking bug as fix released. ** Changed in: linux-rt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399163] Re: [needs packaging] xwax
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- [needs packaging] xwax https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416172] [NEW] [needs-packaging] pyjack - python client module for Jack audio connection kit
Public bug reported: jack audio client module for python Homepage: http://py-jack.sourceforge.net/ ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] pyjack - python client module for Jack audio connection kit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325004] Re: Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6
attached is the requested debian directory diff ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Attachment added: "diff.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30528316/diff.txt -- Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325004] Re: Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6
1) Great! 2) Done. 3) You're right, I was being stupid/forgetful/etc... --enable-alsa is no longer a valid configure option and libasound-dev is no longer a required build-dep. Fixed. 4) DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS deleted also did some closer inspection of the copyright file and realized it needed reworking... done. ** Attachment added: "denemo_0.8.6-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30504044/denemo_0.8.6-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415680] Re: upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Fix Released -- upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325004] Re: Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6
** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: New => Confirmed -- Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415680] Re: upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1
Here is a diff.gz for the newer version. Hopefully it will get uploaded to karmic before feature freeze. ** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "tap-plugins_0.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30497726/tap-plugins_0.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415680] [NEW] upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tap-plugins A new upstream version is available. A bugfix version of TAP-plugins has been released. It aims to fix: * problems on 64-bit (silence in EQ, etc) * denormal problems * GCC compiler warnings * uninitialised variables (detected via Valgrind) Thanks to Damon Chaplin for spotting the issues, working on the solution and preparing a patch. TAP-plugins is hosted on SourceForge, please visit: http://tap-plugins.sf.net http://sourceforge.net/projects/tap-plugins/ There is no new functionality in this release. If 0.7.0 works perfectly for you, there is no need to upgrade. ** Affects: tap-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- upgrade to new upstream version 0.7.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287782] Re: No default background in 8.10 RC images
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-look (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- No default background in 8.10 RC images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287782 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414131] [NEW] Upgrade mixxx to latest release (from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mixxx The new version of Mixxx is out with the following new features: * Hugely improved MIDI controller support - see http://mixxxblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/midi-scripting-and-stanton-scs3d-videos.html * Better vinyl control support * Savable cue points * Many performance improvements and bug fixes Can be downloaded from: http://www.mixxx.org/download.php ** Affects: mixxx Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mixxx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: mixxx Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgrade mixxx to latest release (from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191998] Re: [needs-packaging] foo-plugins
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] foo-plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191998 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325004] Re: Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6
Hi Daniel 1) I moved the package to texlive because of the description of the tetex-bin package: "teTeX is no longer developed upstream, and has been replaced by the TeX Live collection. This is a transitional package to bring former teTeX users a decent selection of TeX Live packages. It can be safely removed (unless some external packages still depend on tetex-bin). " There may have also been a build issue that prompted this switch (I didn't go looking for that out of the blue) but it's been a month since I built this package and exact reasons have faded into the terminal. I can try to re-create my reasoning if you need me to, but that would involve repackaging this again... 2) You're right, that patch should probably get renamed to 04_ubuntuize.patch as it adjusts the default pdf reader, midi player, and text editor. The naming convention was just inherited from the previous package, likely created from a 'print to pdf' bug. Separating the midi player change to another patch, just for the sake of sticking to the patch's name seems silly since it's all in the same file. 3) Yes, probably you could but that would cripple the audio playback of the software and many people would file bugs against this error. -- Upgrade denemo package from 0.7.7 to 0.8.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148585] Re: ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association)
Attached is a working patched Ardour 2.8.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz This fixes both this bug and Bug #412634 (the upstream version compiles with gcc4.4) ** Attachment added: "ardour_2.8.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30266792/ardour_2.8.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412908] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30265931/Xorg.0.log.old -- Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412908] Re: Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver
Screenshot after boot. ** Attachment added: "pict0054.jpg" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30265943/pict0054.jpg -- Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412908] [NEW] Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver
Public bug reported: System boots fine, I can access everything via tty login, but graphics freezes with green stripes down the screen. See attached screenshot and my Xorg.0.log file for more details. ** Affects: linux-rt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kernel 2.6.31-1.1 does not work with Radeon graphics driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412732] Re: gnome-keybinding-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist()
This bug also occurred for me and is 100% reproducible. I attempted to open Gnome-keybinding-properties and it won't open, Apport launches and asks me to report the bug. Switching bug to Confirmed. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- gnome-keybinding-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148585] Re: ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association)
Updated debdiff removes the include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk line that was killing the build, and should no longer be needed in Karmic anyway. This patch hasn't been fully tested yet due to Bug #412634 ** Attachment added: "ardour_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30244660/ardour_2.8-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412634] [NEW] 2.8 Fails to build from package source in Karmic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ardour Currently in Karmic, the 2.8 source package does not build. Here is the build error: g++ -o libs/midi++2/fifomidi.os -c -Woverloaded-virtual -DGTK_NEW_TOOLTIP_API -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -fstrength-reduce -pipe -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -DHAVE_LIBLO -Ilibs -DENABLE_NLS -pthread -DWITH_ALSA -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DLIBSIGC_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -fPIC -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Ilibs/pbd -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -Ilibs/midi++2 -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include libs/midi++2/fifomidi.cc g++ -o libs/midi++2/midi.os -c -Woverloaded-virtual -DGTK_NEW_TOOLTIP_API -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -fstrength-reduce -pipe -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -DHAVE_LIBLO -Ilibs -DENABLE_NLS -pthread -DWITH_ALSA -D_REENTRANT -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DLIBSIGC_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -fPIC -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Ilibs/pbd -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -Ilibs/midi++2 -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include libs/midi++2/midi.cc libs/midi++2/midi.cc: In function 'MIDI::byte MIDI::decode_controller_name(const char*)': libs/midi++2/midi.cc:164: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' scons: *** [libs/midi++2/midi.os] Error 1 scons: building terminated because of errors. make: *** [debian/stamp-scons-build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 This is most likely due to GCC4.4 ** Affects: ardour (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ardour (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #505960 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505960 ** Also affects: ardour (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505960 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- 2.8 Fails to build from package source in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407841] [NEW] Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it
Public bug reported: Jack should be put into the Main repository so that other sound servers in Ubuntu can integrate with it. Here are a few related bugs that all depend on this action: Bug #152487 Jack output for xine apps Bug #84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin Bug #109659 jack sink missing in pulseaudio Bug#360590 Please compile portaudio with Jack support ** Affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: jack-audio-connection-kit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support
This bug relies on Jack getting accepted into Main (as Артём Попов had mentioned). However, before that can be done, all of the necessary dependencies of Jack need to be accepted into Main (I believe libffado is one particular important piece). Some members of the Ubuntu Studio dev team have been talking about this/working on this for a bit now and maybe if someone wants to spearhead this effort they could help guide things along. Here are a few other bugs that also depend on Jack's inclusion into Main: Bug #152487 Jack output for xine apps Bug #84900 libasound2-plugins misses alsa pcm jack plugin Bug #109659 jack sink missing in pulseaudio and this one that I've just reported against the Jack-audio-connection-kit package: Bug #407841 Jack package is not currently in Main repository which prevents many Main audio servers from integrating with it -- Please compile portaudio with Jack support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360590] Re: Please compile portaudio with Jack support
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => Medium -- Please compile portaudio with Jack support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360590 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148585] Re: ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association)
Sebastien, the debian bug tracker doesn't want to load in my browser, it just keeps timing out - is that project even active anymore I thought every debian user switched to Ubuntu years ago... (sorry for the sarcasm). I'll try to get around to filling a bug there eventually, but frankly I develop for Ubuntu and I haven't yet bothered to learn the administrative process for Debian. Can I suggest an upgrade to Launchpad that would allow bugs to be either marked as Ubuntu-specific or non-Ubuntu-specific so that duplicate bugs don't need to be filed in debian, they can just check the non-Ubuntu-specific side of things on Launchpad? Does this patch's upload to Karmic depend on me filing a duplicate bug in debian's system and attaching a duplicate patch there? -- ".ardour" project files are not recognized by GNOME (no file type association) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
Colin, you mentioned that you'd certainly have this package done for Karmic, and Karmic's feature freeze is on it's way around the bend. What's the status of your packaging effort? Need a hand? -- [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99965] Re: [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite
** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- [needs-packaging] celtx - all-in-one video and media pre-production suite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399163] Re: [needs packaging] xwax
Currently this bug is awaiting upload in REVU: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/xwax Hopefully this can be taken care of before Karmic's release. ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: ubuntustudio Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Hedekar (stochastic) (stochastic) -- [needs packaging] xwax https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
