[Bug 999076] Re: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub
I did a reboot now without the spare (i did all this because i had a remote server without grub ;) ) and after the reboot from kernel 2.6 to kernel 3.2 adding the spare worked for some reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub
I still have troubles here. I found out something interesting: I used zero-superblock with --force on the disk and the partition, and i used dd to zero over the end of the partition and disks. It works now, but when i add the spare-drive to the RAID i get the "error: found two disks with the index 4 for RAID md0." again. When i remove the spare and zero the superblock, it works again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub
What can i do to get my spare working? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: mdadm 0.9 metadata at the end of the disk confuses grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
grub-probe: info: cannot open `/boot/grub/device.map'. grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd0. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd2. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd3. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd4. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: scanning hd0 for LVM. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: scanning hd1 for LVM. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: scanning hd2 for LVM. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: scanning hd3 for LVM. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: scanning hd4 for LVM. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd0. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd2. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd3. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd4. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd0. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd2. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd3. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd4. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd0. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd0,msdos1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Found array md0 (mdraid09). grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd1,msdos1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd2. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd2,msdos1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd3. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd3,msdos1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd4. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd4,msdos1. grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk md0. grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devic
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Hm. But at least it said "installation finished". Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 18 heads, 30 sectors/track, 1808839 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xbf7f Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 63 heads, 30 sectors/track, 516811 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0001391b Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 27 heads, 30 sectors/track, 1205892 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0002f2f3 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdd: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 24 heads, 14 sectors/track, 2907063 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00037497 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdd1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sde: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 27 heads, 30 sectors/track, 1205892 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xe50d27b1 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sde1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/md0: 1500.3 GB, 1500312305664 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 366287184 cylinders, total 2930297472 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 65536 bytes / 196608 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Will this remove the "superfluous RAID member" warnings? Because they are the only ones left. I'm asking because i'm remotely logged into the machine and can't stop the RAID to zero the superblock -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Also: Does grub2 still need /boot/grub/device.map? The installer didn't create one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
You, Sir, are a pleasure to work with. I did dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 seek=976772001 of=/dev/sdX on each disk. Though i'm not sure if seek should have been one less, do you know that? Anyway, grub-install now only shows: sudo grub-install /dev/sda error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). Installation finished. No error reported. What does it mean? Is that bad? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Ill post the output of /usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub I resized the partition to be from sector 2048 to 976772000 (of 976773168). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: cannot open `/boot/grub/device.map'. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd0. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd1. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd2. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd3. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for dmraid_nv RAID devices on disk hd4. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: scanning hd0 for LVM. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: scanning hd1 for LVM. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: scanning hd2 for LVM. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: scanning hd3 for LVM. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: no LVM signature found. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: scanning hd4 for LVM. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk lvm-data. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk lvm-swap. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk lvm-root. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd0. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Found array md0 (mdraid09). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd1. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd2. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd3. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd4. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk lvm-data. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk lvm-swap. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk lvm-root. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd0. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd1. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd1 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd2. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd2 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd3. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd3 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid1x RAID devices on disk hd4. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd4 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Scanning for mdraid09 RAID devices on disk hd0. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the size of hd0 is 976773168. /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: Found array md0 (mdraid09). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: info: the siz
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
*sigh* I resized all my disks to be a bit smaller, but it still doesn't help. Though the message has changed, now it's only error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. the index 0 message went away. Any tips? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
By googling for a few hours, i can't reproduce my query though. Maybe one should mention that since i don't want to rebuild my entire raid, apparently it's ok for mdadm if you fail a disk, shrink the partition a bit and re-add it. Apparently there's margin for error, at least mdadm doesn't complain, I hope it doesn't break my RAID :/. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Right now i'm trying to resize the individual partition to leave some space at the end of the disk, since i think my bug might be related to this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/776422 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] Re: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
/dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Sat Aug 28 16:19:54 2010 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 1465148736 (1397.27 GiB 1500.31 GB) Used Dev Size : 488382912 (465.76 GiB 500.10 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 5 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon May 14 18:12:08 2012 State : active Active Devices : 4 Working Devices : 5 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K UUID : 9e41c020:85eb05dd:a3f83a12:f3b86535 Events : 0.9459 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 490 active sync /dev/sdd1 1 8 171 active sync /dev/sdb1 2 8 652 active sync /dev/sde1 3 8 333 active sync /dev/sdc1 4 81- spare /dev/sda1 Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 18 heads, 30 sectors/track, 1808839 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xbf7f Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0001391b Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 *2048 976768064 488383008+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdc: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 81 heads, 63 sectors/track, 191411 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0002f2f3 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdc1 *2048 976773167 488385560 fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sdd: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 24 heads, 14 sectors/track, 2907063 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00037497 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdd1 *2048 976772000 488384976+ fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/sde: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 81 heads, 63 sectors/track, 191411 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xe50d27b1 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sde1 *2048 976773167 488385560 fd Linux RAID autodetect Disk /dev/md0: 1500.3 GB, 1500312305664 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 366287184 cylinders, total 2930297472 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 65536 bytes / 196608 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999076 Title: Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/999076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999076] [NEW] Upgrade vom 10.04 LTS Server to 12.04 LTS Server breaks grub
Public bug reported: I tried to upgrade a server, and i was left with a broken grub2. I think it has to do something with LVM/RAID. My setup: /root lies on LVM which is on a Raid5. There's not separate boot partition. When i reinstall grub2 from the command-line i get the following errors: ... Setting up grub-pc (1.99-21ubuntu3) ... Creating config file /etc/default/grub with new version error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem. Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/mapper/lvm-root failed. Try with --recheck. If the problem persists please report this together with the output of "/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub" to error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem. Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/mapper/lvm-root failed. Try with --recheck. If the problem persists please report this together with the output of "/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub" to error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem. Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/mapper/lvm-root failed. Try with --recheck. If the problem persists please report this together with the output of "/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub" to error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem. Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/mapper/lvm-root failed. Try with --recheck. If the problem persists please report this together with the output of "/usr/sbin/grub-probe --device-map="/boot/grub/device.map" --target=fs -v /boot/grub" to error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: found two disks with the index 0 for RAID md0. error: found two disks with the index 3 for RAID md0. error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). error: superfluous RAID member (4 found). /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: unknown filesystem. Auto-detection of a filesystem of /dev/mapper/lvm-root failed. Try with --recheck. If the problem persists please report this together with the output of
[Bug 625169] Re: ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5
It's not a dupe, but I got this fdisk-solution from the last comment of #569900 "I opened bug #605720 for what I think is the root cause of this problem. I don't know how the installer does partitioning but it exhibits the same behavior. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/605720"; -- ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625169] Re: ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5
I found the main other bug, i think: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/mdadm/+bug/569900 -- ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625169] Re: ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5
The fdisk bug: #605720 Maybe related: #601740 Could you mark this "important"? You can find so many "raid / lvm fails on 10.04 installation" and nobody really has an answer, just workarounds. -- ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601740] Re: Kernel 2.6.32-23-generic breaks LVM on RAID and GRUB on Boot
How does on make links to bugs? -- Kernel 2.6.32-23-generic breaks LVM on RAID and GRUB on Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601740] Re: Kernel 2.6.32-23-generic breaks LVM on RAID and GRUB on Boot
Maybe related: #605720 (fixed my LVM+Raid Problems on Lucid Server) -- Kernel 2.6.32-23-generic breaks LVM on RAID and GRUB on Boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625169] Re: ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5
I solved the problem, it has two related bug reports here, but I can't find them anymore. The problem was that apparently fdisk has a bug, which lets it create partitions which are 1 cylinder larger than the disk. If you install raid on such a system anything could happen. The raid will not start or randomly etc. I solved it by manually creating the 4 primary partitions on the disks with fdisk and than used the standard server install to setup raid+lvm on it. works like a charm. -- ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625169] [NEW] ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5
Public bug reported: Hi, I did a fresh install of ubuntu 10.04 server-amd64 yesterday on a new machine with 4 identical s-ata drives in it. - I configured the drives to form a raid5 - then put lvm on it - then made three partitions: swap, / (ext4) and /srv (ext4) i used the standard installation routine for this. after installing and not choosing any additional packages (except for postgresql and samba) i rebootet and the boot process failed with the message (not 100% accurate). "Gave up waiting for root device." The device was "/dev/mapper/lvmOnRaid-root" What do to? Please note, that I didn't do anything fancy, just performed a standard install. fabian ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: boot grub lvm raid ** Summary changed: - ubuntu server fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid + ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 -- ubuntu server 10.04amd64 fails to boot after installation on lvm+raid5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56171] Re: Microsoft LifeCam VX-6000 High Definition Webcam doesn't work at all.
Camera doesn't work in 8.04. -- Microsoft LifeCam VX-6000 High Definition Webcam doesn't work at all. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178904] Re: external drive not writeable
What do you mean? Apparently Ubuntu uses wrong permissions during the mount. When I mount it myself it works. So why is this marked "Incomplete"? fabian -- external drive not writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178904] Re: external drive not writeable
Any help here? -- external drive not writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194036] [NEW] [patch] option to crack passwords by group
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: john Hi, I used john to crack all passwords on my system. Since i justed wanted to test the group which is allowed to login per SSH, I patched the cronjob. ** Affects: john (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: crack group john password -- [patch] option to crack passwords by group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194036] Re: [patch] option to crack passwords by group
** Attachment added: "john-cron.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12132978/john-cron.patch -- [patch] option to crack passwords by group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194036] Re: [patch] option to crack passwords by group
** Attachment added: "john-mail.conf.patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12132981/john-mail.conf.patch -- [patch] option to crack passwords by group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194036] Re: [patch] option to crack passwords by group
I think I prefer somebody else to do that. Thank you. -- [patch] option to crack passwords by group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95326] Re: sound juicer aac formatted files skip and...
Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > This bug, and others, made me consider an alternative firmware. Now I > don't use any proprietary AAC or MP3 formats. I use OGG/FLAC/SPX on > my Rockbox firmware iPod now... > http://www.rockbox.org/ The problem with rockbox is, that it isn't available for IPods of the last generation, and probably never will be. (And there are still people in the world who want to _keep_ the apple firmware, because they like it. Me for example :-) ) -- sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 16432] Re: custom filters to match packages from specific repositories
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- custom filters to match packages from specific repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180110] Re: applications should use taglib instead of id3lib
I think B is hardly more work than C. And why create a glue library when you can use taglib or libid3tag directly? Code has to be changed anyway. @MP3-Players: This is a difficult issue, maybe we should rely on that they at least support ID3 v1. -- applications should use taglib instead of id3lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180110] Re: applications should use taglib instead of id3lib
** Also affects: tagtool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: easytag (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- applications should use taglib instead of id3lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120538] Re: id3 tag version differences result in confusing behaviour (e.g. rhythmbox, easytag)
Bug 180110. -- id3 tag version differences result in confusing behaviour (e.g. rhythmbox, easytag) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178904] Re: external drive not writeable
I think it depends on the partition type. My vfat partition on one drive is recognized as "removeable" whereas the xfs partition is not. -- external drive not writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64905] Re: Mp3 metadata (ID3 tags) are corrupt
This is the problem: Bug 180110 -- Mp3 metadata (ID3 tags) are corrupt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 16432] Re: custom filters to match packages from specific repositories
Gutsy has the option in synaptic, so I think we can close this bug. -- custom filters to match packages from specific repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180110] applications should use taglib instead of id3lib
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libid3-3.8.3 There are many problems with applications which use id3lib, because it wasn't updated in 5 years and can only write ID3 2.3 tags. Most ubuntu-supported applications such as Sound-Juicer or AmaroK read and write ID3 2.4 only which leads to confusing behaviour. The best would be to convince application authors to switch to TagLib which is much better maintained at the moment. Related bugs: Bug 120538 Bug 64905 Bug 178113 ** Affects: id3lib3.8.3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: libid3-3.8.3 There are many problems with applications which use id3lib, because it wasn't updated in 5 years and can only write ID3 2.3 tags. Most ubuntu-supported applications such as Sound-Juicer or AmaroK read and write ID3 2.4 only which leads to confusing behaviour. The best would be to convince application authors to switch to TagLib which is much better maintained at the moment. Related bugs: - #120538 - #64905 - #178113 + Bug 120538 + Bug 64905 + Bug 178113 -- applications should use taglib instead of id3lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180110 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138346] Re: gstreamer produces bad MP4/AAC audio files when specifying non-standard encoding options
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 95326 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 95326 sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... -- gstreamer produces bad MP4/AAC audio files when specifying non-standard encoding options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138346 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95326] Re: sound juicer aac formatted files skip and...
I added a duplicate and found another related bug: #106322. Is there at least some workaround for this? -- sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178113] Re: id3 tags are not recognized by other applications
I close this bug, because I noticed that sound-juicer simply writes id3 2.4 tags whereas most application only recognize id3 2.3. ** Changed in: sound-juicer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- id3 tags are not recognized by other applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122084] Re: gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz
This works for me now. I use gutsy with the original nvidia-driver. -- gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
At the moment it's like this: - In Thunderbird 1.5 with patch applied and EnigMail installed, ReplyToList works. - In Thunderbird 2.0 you don't need EnigMail, but: * Either you turn on "Show All Headers", then you can use ReplyToList version 2.* * or you add "List-Post" to mailnews.headers.extraExpandedHeaders in about:config, then you can too use ReplayToList version 2.* * or you can use ReplyToList version 3.0, where don't need to set "Show All Headers" or extraExpandedHeaders, but this version just works with POP and not with IMAP (yet), which is considered a bug and should be fixed sooner or later. -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178904] external drive not writeable
Public bug reported: Hi, I have a external drive which isn't writeable when I plug in in, thought the icon appears on the desktop. Compared to other drives which work this one says "Removable: no" in the properties-dialog. It gets mounted /dev/sdc1 on /media/disk type ext3 (rw,nosuid,nodev) whereas the other ones get mounted /dev/sdd1 on /media/truhe type vfat (rw,nosuid,nodev,shortname=mixed,uid=1000,utf8,umask=077,usefree) I use Ubuntu 7.10. fabian ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- external drive not writeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178113] id3 tags are not recognized by other applications
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sound-juicer Hi, I use Sound-Juicer for CD-ripping unter Ubuntu Gutsy. Only few other program like amaroK recognize the tags correctly. Audio TagTool for example cannot. When I do id3info file.mp3 it says *** Tag information for file.mp3 *** mp3 info MPEG1/layer III Bitrate: 256KBps Frequency: 44KHz Not more. ** Affects: sound-juicer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- id3 tags are not recognized by other applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64905] Re: Mp3 metadata (ID3 tags) are corrupt
Is there anything new about that? I too have this problem with sound- juicer and tagtool. -- Mp3 metadata (ID3 tags) are corrupt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56171] Re: Microsoft LifeCam VX-6000 High Definition Webcam doesn't work at all.
Has there any progress been made about this? -- Microsoft LifeCam VX-6000 High Definition Webcam doesn't work at all. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95326] Re: sound juicer aac formatted files skip and...
AAC is as far as I know not a proprietary format. It's even standardised by ISO. If the format is not supported by the standard installation, then why does soundjuicer offer it? -- sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
It crashes when using in conjunction with IMAP. With POP everything works, I already told the maintainer about this issue. -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
I have TBird 2.0.0.8 installed, I just thought it was 2.0.0.6 because the aboutpage says that. I have contact with the developer of the extension who just released 0.3.0 which features Auto-Update and doesn't need any additional extensions any more. Unfortunately it crashes for me, I already told him that, but maybe you can try it too? http://alumnit.ca/wiki/attachments/replytolist-0.3.0.xpi @Dean: Do you mean it doesn't work when view normal header _isn't_ chosen? So exactly the opposite behaviour of mine? -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
I tested with tbird 2.0.0.6 from ubuntu. I deactivated all my other plugins except enigmail to be sure and get the same result: when using view->headers->normal headers the button is grey. It doesn't matter whether you "expand" or "collapse" header in the mail window itself. Just the option in view menu has to be set. John: Do you use enigmail or mnehy? fabian -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
Ok, sorry, I just figured out I made a mistake: Reply-To-List works, but only when you have configured thunderbird to show _all_ headers. When you select "normal" headers, the button get's greyed out, cause the extension doesn't find the List-Post header anymore. Apparently Thunderbird makes only the visible headers available to extensions. I have another extension installed "Display mailinglist headers" which also only works with all headers displayed. I'm definitely sure, that in Thunderbird 1.5 both extension worked, no matter how the "Show Header"-option is set. -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
Yes, I have enigmail installed. -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
It doesn't work in Gutsy, using the above mentioned Extension. The Button is always greyed out. ** Changed in: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52667 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95326] Re: sound juicer aac formatted files skip and...
this bug should have all necessary information. if not describe what exactly you need. ** Changed in: sound-juicer (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95326] Re: sound juicer aac formatted files skip and...
* Install the following gstreamer-10-plugins (some of them in multiverse and universe): base, good, bad, bad-multiverse, ugly, ugly-multiverse, ffmpeg * Do NOT install any gstreamer-0.8 packages * insert a CD and open soundjuicer * create/select a pipeline like this: audio/x-raw-int,rate=44100,channels=2 ! faac ! ffmux_mp4 * rip the CD * listen to the tracks I see this bug too, and not only on my computer but on any ubuntu- machine I use. -- sound juicer aac formatted files skip and... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122084] Re: gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz
Feisty (7.04) -- gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122081] Re: beagle search in filechooser not possible
OK: 1. I'm using feisty. 2. It would be great if I can directly do a beaglesearch from the fileopen-dialog. Example: I want to send someone a file via jabber/IM. The IM-application opens a filechooser. I don't know exactly where I have it so i just type in a few search terms and can select it. -- beagle search in filechooser not possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122085] close-window-button in compiz sometimes closes window below
Public bug reported: When I have multiple maximied windows open on compiz, sometimes the click on the closebutton in the upperright, selects the window below and closes it. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- close-window-button in compiz sometimes closes window below https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122084] gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz
Public bug reported: When compiz/gldesktop is enabled, gnome-screensaver doesn't work. it slowly fades to black, then flashes and the desktop is there again. after the configured time (e.g. 5 minutes) it agains fades to black and so on... Turning of compiz fixes this behaviour... ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-screensaver doesn't work with compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122081] beagle search in filechooser not possible
Public bug reported: It would be a _major_ improvement if searching out of a fileopen-dialog was possible. ** Affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- beagle search in filechooser not possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
Hm, since feisty is about to be released soon, I guess I don't need it if it's that complicated, but thanks ;) -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://launchpad.net/bugs/52667 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
Hi, is it then possible to use feisty packages in edgy. I cannot simply install it, because they depend on different libc version etc. Is it possible to put the patch in edgy-backports? fabian -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://launchpad.net/bugs/52667 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
Alexander: Can you compile a thunderbird 1.5.0.10 testing package too? ;) -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://launchpad.net/bugs/52667 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85886] Re: gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user
I get a dialog which says: You do not seem to be logged in on the console. Starting a new login only works correctly on the console. -- gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user https://launchpad.net/bugs/85886 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85886] Re: gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user
@1: I'm using ubuntu 6.10. @2: Run gdmflexiserver? How? From a xterm? -- gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user https://launchpad.net/bugs/85886 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90340] gdm/gnome freezes/locks up after logout
Public bug reported: Hi, every now and then GDM/Gnome/X freezes when I logout. Then the background I had in GNOME and the mousecursor are still displayed, but nothing else. I can move the mouse around, but I _cannot_ do CTRL+Alt+Backspace. Funnily I can log in remotely by using gdm-chooser and get the gdm I run on this machine and everything works perfectly. When I try to restart gdm (e.g. using a remote shell) or killall X, the machine locks up and has to be resettet manually... greetings fabian My gdm.conf for always showing the chooser: [servers] 0=Chooser [server-Standard] name=Standard server command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 flexible=true [server-Terminal] name=Terminal server command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 -terminate flexible=false handled=false [server-Chooser] name=Chooser server command=/usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -audit 0 flexible=false chooser=true ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gdm/gnome freezes/locks up after logout https://launchpad.net/bugs/90340 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85886] gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user
Public bug reported: Hi, I configured GDM to show the chooser by default, so I can select the computer I want to connect to. When I connect to the local host Gnome starts and everything works fine. When I use the shutdown menu in Gnome, I'm offered the option "Switch User", which does not work. It brings me back to the gnome-screensaver every time instead of starting a new GDM. I think this is a flaw per design, because, gdmchooser offers me a network connection to my local host instead of a direct X display, i think? Can it be fixed? greetings and many thanks for creating and maintaining this wonderful system! ;) ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gdmchooser breaks gnome-switch-user https://launchpad.net/bugs/85886 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52667] Re: Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List
This has been fixed in Debian unstable and I wanted to know how the status of this bug is? I think thousands of users would be _very_ glad if the had reply-to-list feature in Thunderbird. -- Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List https://launchpad.net/bugs/52667 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
