[Bug 278040] Re: Cannot remove some default-installed applications
Yes, with software-center is everything fine. Thanks! ** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Status: New = Invalid -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278169] Re: gnome-utils appears as multiple applications
Thanks to all! -- gnome-utils appears as multiple applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201676] Re: gnome-pilot shouldn't be a dependency of ubuntu-desktop
As of ubuntu-desktop 1.172 (Karmic fully updated), nor gnome-pilot neither gnome-pilot-conduits are dependency of ubuntu-desktop. Can this bug be marked as Fix Released? -- gnome-pilot shouldn't be a dependency of ubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278187] Re: some packages should be recomended dependencies
Using software-center (in Karmic fully updated) I can remove both of them without any problem, so I think that: * this bug wasn't on ubuntu-desktop (because dependencies are always of recommends type), rather on gnome-app-install; and * it can be marked as Fix Released. -- some packages should be recomended dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
You've conviced me that cc-by-sa 2.5 is DFSG-nonfree, but the real question is: is ubuntu following DFSG? Back in the days of gobuntu, ubuntu was officially following FSF guidelins rather than the DFSG. And if I understand correctly, cc-by-sa 2.5 is considered free for non-sw work by the FSF (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/). -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31086388/dmesg -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31086451/Xorg.0.log -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
I've tested your packet for a dozen of hours and I can now say that: * flickering is almost gone (apart from those from the previous post, I've seen no other flickering) for classic usage; but * flickering is much worse now using virtualbox (I use a windows xp with virtualbox guest additions). -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
I'm testing your packet right now: expect a report in a couple of days. -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31015751/dmesg -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
I've had a flicker just after upgrading and another after a restart. I'll post another comment if other flickers will come. -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31015766/Xorg.0.log -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
My previous comment was too optimistic. Can this bug be a duplicate of #374413? -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
Errata corrige: can be a duplicate of #397839? -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139758] Re: copyright file is poorly made
As of Jaunty, this bug is resolved. ** Changed in: tango-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- copyright file is poorly made https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139758 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278169] Re: gnome-utils appears as multiple applications
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-utils appears as multiple applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278040] Re: Cannot remove some default-installed applications
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201676] Re: gnome-pilot and ubuntu-desktop
I've added this to one hundred papercuts project since it's trivial, impacts average user first-time experience and because solutions are already given. ** Also affects: hundredpapercuts Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-pilot and ubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
Tell me if I've understood correctly: vrms should show me only packages that I've installed from restricted or multiverse? -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
With karmic alpha3, problem is almost gone: flickering occours every two hours or so. -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
I've tryed to connect monitor and graphics via a DVI cable and problem remains. -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
Problem doesn't occour with current xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd (1.2.4) and older xserver-xorg-video-radeon (6.8.0). -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: widescreen blinks to black
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530123/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530124/LsHal.txt ** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530125/LsMod.txt ** Attachment added: LsPci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530126/LsPci.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530127/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530128/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530130/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530133/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530135/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530143/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: system.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530150/system.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530156/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530159/xkbcomp.txt -- widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] [NEW] widescreen blinks to black
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I have a LG M227WD widescreen monitor and an integrated ati X1250-based graphics in my Gigabyte MA69GM-S2H motherboard; monitor and graphics are connected through an HDMI cable. Whem I am in ubuntu (9.04, fully updated) my monitor blinks to black very often (usually every 3 seconds, but sometimes it blinks even 3-4 times in fast succession) and remains black for about 1 second (again, sometimes it stays black for way more seconds). On the same machine I have a windows xp installation that works just fine. Problem seems not to arise in gdm login screen. I have no xorg.conf file. Please, consider that this is rendering the ubuntu side of my machine nearly unusable. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu18 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersion: Linux versusernamen 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc versusernamen 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374413] Re: [RS690] widescreen blinks to black
Sure: * my machine is a desktop * yes, it's the only connected monitor * yes, but at 1920x1080 I am unable to see the two gnome bars * yes, the bug remains event at 1920x1080 * the bug appears at every resolution that I have tested -- [RS690] widescreen blinks to black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] Re: E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
As of now (system fully upgraded), all is working right. ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] Re: E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
I've tried pgquiles's ppa (alsa-driver 1.0.19): now I can hear again the first song (and yes, again _only_ the first one). ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: linux-meta = alsa-driver -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] Re: E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
As of now (again: system fully updated; linux-image-2.6.28-8-generic 2.6.28-8.24), nothing can be heard. -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278187] Re: some packages should be recomended dependencies
Status is still incomplete: how can I help you understand this bug better (in order to change status and begin resolution)? -- some packages should be recomended dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] Re: E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
As of now (with system fully updated; linux 2.6.28-8.22), I can hear again the first song (as in my first post). -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] Re: E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
As of now (with system fully updated), I cannot hear anything (even the first song). Plese, consider that: * if I use my motherboard-integrated audio, it works just fine; * if I use my E-MU under windows (same computer), it works just fine. dmesg | tail continues to give me usb_set_interface failed. -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327780] [NEW] E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
Public bug reported: My E-MU 0202 can only play one song; after that, it doesn't play anything unless I restart my system (after that, however, I can only play another song an so on). My card worked just right until three-four weeks ago, and stopped working after a system update (I was running ubuntu 8.10). I then switched to jaunty, but nothing changes. dmesg | tail gives me: [ 1591.928099] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1597.224188] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1602.224596] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1607.224141] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1612.224680] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1617.224097] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1622.224143] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1627.224185] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1632.224102] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed [ 1637.224145] 7:1:3: usb_set_interface failed ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 279598] Re: shred is very slow
Thanks for your time and for the links: --random-source=/dev/zero is the stop-gap trick that I was searching. -- shred is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313173] [NEW] impress depends on draw
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-impress When I try to remove openoffice.org-draw from my system I also need to remove openoffice.org-impress; this behaviour annoyes me, since I've never ever used -draw (or even the related functionalities), but I frequently use -impress to do some very simple (and very useful) work. Common functionalities can be exported into openoffice.org-common, or disabled when -draw isn't installed. This behaviour is common to every version of ubuntu so far, including packages from openoffice-pkgs ppa (openoffice.org 3). ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- impress depends on draw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313173 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279598] Re: shred is very slow
Have you finished researching? I ask, at least, to remove the incomplete status: as of 8.10 (fully updated) bug is still there, can be very easly verified by anyone and have a nice and elegant explanation, so this is all but incomplete. -- shred is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 143995] Re: incorrect reference in copyright file
I hope that this (very very trivial) patch is correctly formatted. ** Attachment added: incorrect-reference-in-copyright-file.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20859301/incorrect-reference-in-copyright-file.patch -- incorrect reference in copyright file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/143995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300038] Re: update ufraw to version 0.14.1
I agree: Jaunty _now_ have ufraw 0.14.1, so this bug can be closed. ** Changed in: ufraw (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- update ufraw to version 0.14.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300038] [NEW] update ufraw to version 0.14.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ufraw Pro: * it's the latest version; * it closes bug #228623; * it's already available in debian experimental. ** Affects: ufraw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update ufraw to version 0.14.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
CC-by-sa is considered free for artistic content by the FSF, and the packages listed as non-free by vrms contains icons et similia. The meaning of vrms is indeed Virtual Richard Matthew Stallman, but it lists packages considered non-free by Debian (that's because was written by Debian developers and not by the FSF). -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
CC-by-sa it's free for ubuntu (there was a discussion on the gobuntu-devel mailing list). I know that vrms is a debian project, so that it's impossible for us to send a patch upstream (unless debian itself decide that older CC-by-sa licences are indeed free), but ubuntu can do and apply a patch to the vrms packet without sending it to upstream. It's annoying to use vrms and see a list of debian-non-free packages installed on an ubuntu system: on an ubuntu system I want vrms to list packages considered non-free by ubuntu, not debian. -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279598] Re: shred is very slow
Thank you for reviewing my bug report. A temporary stop-gap fix might be to pick a single value from /dev/urandom and use it for every write of the random pass, instead of picking a different value for every write. Of course, every random pass must pick it's own value to strengthen the process. -- shred is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286326] [NEW] some depends of ubuntu-desktop are listed as applications
Public bug reported: First of all, I'm referring to up-to-date Intrepid: ubuntu-desktop 1.121 and app-install-data 0.6.10. Depends of ubuntu-desktop cannot be removed from ubuntu and are installed by default by live-cd installer or update-manager; so, since gnome-app-install cannot manipulate tham (I mean: install or remove), they shouldn't be listed as applications in app-install-data. The average user list of installed applications tends to be composed nearly exclusively of those applications; this is very annoing. Here is a _complete_ list of the applications that are abstractions of ubuntu-desktop's depends (and the packages that they abstract): * Archive Manager (file-roller) * Calculator (gcalctool) * Character Map (gucharmap) * Configuration Editor (gconf-editor) * Dictionary, Disk Usage Analyzer, Floppy Formatter, System Log (gnome-utils) * Document Viewer (evince) * GDebi Package Installer (gdebi) * GStreamer Dirac Video Plugin (gstreamer0.10-schroedinger) * Hardware Testing (hwtest-gtk) * Image Viewer (eog) * Language Support (language-selector) * Manage Print Jobs, Printing (system-config-printer-gnome) * Menu Editor (gnome-menus) * Network Tools (gnome-nettool) * Passwords and Encryption Keys (seahorse) * Services, Shared Folders, Time and Date, Users and Groups (gnome-system-tools) * Software Sources (software-properties-gtk) * Sound Recorder, Volume Control (gnome-media) * Synaptic Package Manager (synaptic) * System Cleaner (system-cleaner-gtk) * System Monitor (gnome-system-monitor) * Terminal (gnome-terminal) * Text Editor (gedit) * Update Manager (update-manager) Some depends are even represented by multiple (useless) applications! So, I think that these applications should be removed from app- install-data for the sake of clarity. ** Affects: app-install-data-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- some depends of ubuntu-desktop are listed as applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278187] Re: some packages should be recomended dependencies
On my system they're not installed because of gnome-desktop-environment (I don't have it installed; in fact, I've never have it installed in all of my installations of ubuntu), but only because of ubuntu-desktop. gnome-utils and seahorse appears as applications in the list of gnome-app-install, but they're not removable because they're depends. Since applications should _always_ be removable using gnome-app-install, I see two options: 1. make gnome-utils and seahorse only recommends of ubuntu-desktop (and of gnome-desktop-environment); or 2. remove them from the list of applications of gnome-app-install. -- some packages should be recomended dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279598] [NEW] shred is very slow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: coreutils Random passes of shred are painfully slow: it takes me 571 seconds to make the first (random) pass on a 2.0GiB flash device, while only 125 seconds where needed to perform the second pass. So, random passes are nearly _five_ times slower than other passes while erasing flash devices... Please note that this is the same for HDDs: with different times, for course, but the difference can be even bigger (near an order of magnitude on my systems). Tested on Intrepid beta, Hardy and (if I recall correctly) Gutsy. Feisty (again, if I recall correctly) worked just right. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- shred is very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201676] Re: gnome-pilot and ubuntu-desktop
gnome-pilot isn't directly a dependency of ubuntu-desktop: ubuntu- desktop depends on gnome-pilot-conduits that, in turns, depends on gnome-pilot. As of Intrepid, gnome-pilot-conduits was demoted from dependency to recomended dependency in ubuntu-desktop, but PalmOS Devices cannot be removed using gnome-app-install; Why? Because PalmOS Devices (that is, an application in gnome-app-install) refers to gnome-pilot; but gnome-pilot is a dependency of gnome-pilot-conduits that, in turns, is a recomended dependency of ubuntu-desktop; so, software depends on PalmOS Devices and it cannot be removed (in gnome-app-install). Some options to fix this: 1. replace the recomended dependency of gnome-pilot-conduits in ubuntu-desktop with gnome-pilot; or 2. make the PalmOS Devices application refers to gnome-pilot-conduits instead of gnome-pilot. -- gnome-pilot and ubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278040] [NEW] Cannot remove some default-installed applications
Public bug reported: Some applications that should be removable using gnome-app-install (because they're useless to me and _nothing_ depends on them), aren't. They are (but I'm not sure that they're limited to): 1. Bluetooth Analyzer (bluez-gnome) 2. Evolution Mail and Calendar (evolution) 3. PalmOS Devices (gnome-pilot) 4. Pidgin Internet Messenger (pidgin) All of them are recomended dependency of ubuntu-desktop (except gnome- pilot, that is installed via gnome-pilot-conduits) just like f-spot but, unlike that, they cannot be removed; I have removed them manually (using synaptic) and I've got no problems. All version of gnome-app-install (and, of cource, gnome-app-install- data-ubuntu) that I've used are buggy (Hardy stable and Intrepid beta). ** Affects: app-install-data-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278040] Re: Cannot remove some default-installed applications
** Description changed: Some applications that should be removable using gnome-app-install (because they're useless to me and _nothing_ depends on them), aren't. They are (but I'm not sure that they're limited to): 1. Bluetooth Analyzer (bluez-gnome) 2. Evolution Mail and Calendar (evolution) 3. PalmOS Devices (gnome-pilot) 4. Pidgin Internet Messenger (pidgin) All of them are recomended dependency of ubuntu-desktop (except gnome- pilot, that is installed via gnome-pilot-conduits) just like f-spot but, unlike that, they cannot be removed; I have removed them manually (using synaptic) and I've got no problems. - All version of gnome-app-install (and, of cource, gnome-app-install- - data-ubuntu) that I've used are buggy (Hardy stable and Intrepid beta). + All version of gnome-app-install (and, of course, app-install-data- + ubuntu) that I've used are buggy (Hardy stable and Intrepid beta). -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278040] Re: Cannot remove some default-installed applications
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. I wasn't trying to remove packages directly: I was trying to remove application, instead. However, I've already listed all the applications and packages that gave me problems. There is nothig that triggers this behaviour: If you install a fresh copy of ubuntu (lets say Hardy, but it's not limited to Hardy) and you try to remove, lets say, Bluetooth Analyzer using gnome-app-install, you cannot. Have I answered to your queston? -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278040] Re: Cannot remove some default-installed applications
I've found the source of the bug for the Pidgin Internet Messenger application (pidgin package): pidgin and pidgin-otr are (recomended) dependency of ubuntu-desktop; gnome-app-install fails to remove Pidgin Internet Messenger because pidgin is a dependency of pidgin-otr. I bet that we can fix the bug (for Pidgin Internet Messenger) if: 1. the recomended dependency of pidgin-otr is removed from ubuntu-desktop; 2. the dependency of pidgin is removed from pidgin-otr; 3. the dependency of pidgin-otr is added to pidgin. -- Cannot remove some default-installed applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278169] [NEW] gnome-utils appears as multiple applications
Public bug reported: Dictionary, Disk Usage Analyzer, Floppy Formatter and System Log are provided by the same unbreakable and indivisible package (gnome-utils). They all have the same description (they differ only in the name) and that description enumerates all of them; since gnome-app-install is able to search into the description, they should be merged into a single entity for the sake of clarity. ** Affects: app-install-data-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-utils appears as multiple applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278187] [NEW] some packages should be recomended dependencies
Public bug reported: gnome-utils and seahorse are dependencies of ubuntu-desktop, so they're installed by default and cannot be removed using gnome-app-install. Since they're useless to me, why don't make them only _recomended_ dependencies (so that they're installed by default but can be removed using gnome-app-install)? ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- some packages should be recomended dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
GNU FDL is DFSG free provided the invariant section clauses are not used. Yes, but e.g. autoconf-doc uses the FDL and is still list as non-free; this is because, as long as I know, software from FSF uses the FDL entirely (invariant sections included). -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 144006] Re: CC-by-sa reported as non-free
I also see autoconf-doc, gdb-doc, manpages-posix, manpages-posix-dev and make-doc between non-free packages, is it right? It sounds strange. Forgive me for the delay, please. Well, vrms is a debian software, so even packages with the GNU FDL are listed as non-free (such as autoconf-doc, for example). In the perspective that the ubuntu freeness policy is (or will be) based on the FSF's one, I think that this package needs a heavy effort for ubuntization. -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 150605] Re: copyright file is incomplete
On Nov 7, 2007 11:31 PM, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The below (taken from the file), sure looks like a copyright notice and license. Copyright: Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Internet Software Consortium. Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = LaMont Jones (lamont) Status: Incomplete = Invalid Sorry, I've badly read the copyright when I've made the report. -- copyright file is incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150605] copyright file is incomplete
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 The copyright field is left empty and no license is specified in the file. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- copyright file is incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 150605] copyright file is incomplete
On 10/8/07, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:22:34PM -, Gegio0 wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 Which version of bind9 are you using ? 1:9.4.1-P1-3 (Gutsy Gibbon). -- copyright file is incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 150605] Re: copyright file is incomplete
On 10/8/07, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Status: New = Incomplete What kind of informations do you need to complete the status of the bug? -- copyright file is incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 150316] package name should be ubuntu-artwork-usplash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash-theme-ubuntu Other *buntus usplash-artwork package name follow the format distribution name-artwork-usplash. Only ubuntu's one differs. ** Affects: usplash-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- package name should be ubuntu-artwork-usplash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150316 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 143992] copyright file is poorly made
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tango-icon-theme-common The copyright file for tango-icon-theme-common has the following flaws: 1. the copyright field is empty (usually is held by Canonical or by upstream authors); 2. stock-icons/* is under LGPL (at line 21): but the folder doesn't exist in this package; 3. the file doesn't meet the commonly used 80-chars line limit. ** Affects: tango-icon-theme-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- copyright file is poorly made https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/143992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 143995] incorrect reference in copyright file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tangerine-icon-theme At line 25: The Human Icon Theme should be The Tangerine Icon Theme. ** Affects: tangerine-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- incorrect reference in copyright file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/143995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144006] CC-by-sa reported as non-free
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vrms vrms reports packages under CC-by-sa (= 2.0) to be non-free; this packages are (at least): human-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme and tangerine-icon-theme. This packages doesn't meet DFSG, but since gobuntu (the ultra-ortodox flavor of ubuntu) follow FSF guidelines instead, I think it's more appropriate to ubuntize vrms to remove these false positives. Note that also CC-by (= 2.0) packages may be affected. ** Affects: vrms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- CC-by-sa reported as non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139758] copyright file is poorly made
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tango-icon-theme The copyright file for tango-icon-theme has the following flaws: 1. the copyright field is empty (usually is held by Canonical or by upstream authors); 2. the file doesn't meet the commonly used 80-chars line limit; 3. it isn't specified the license used for the package itself (usually GPL, in the last lines of the file). ** Affects: tango-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- copyright file is poorly made https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139758 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 52523] Re: False positive non-free with vrms?
vrms reports packages under CC-by-sa to be non-free; this packages are (at least): human-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme and tangerine-icon-theme. This packages doesn't meet DFSG, but since gobuntu (the ultra-ortodox branch of ubuntu) follow FSF guidelines instead, I whink it's more appropriate to ubuntize vrms. -- False positive non-free with vrms? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
