[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34162] Re: ubuntu won't start
Had sucess with edgy sorry forgot to update -- ubuntu won't start https://launchpad.net/bugs/34162 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
Public bug reported: The 7.04 was installed newly,and I installed few software. But I can't upgrade. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Oct 19 13:44:19 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp Package: yelp 2.18.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: yelp ProcCwd: /home/gerry ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=zh_CN.UTF-8 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux gerry-ubuntu 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154203] Re: I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062370/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062371/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10062372/ProcStatus.txt -- I can't upgrade from 7.04 to 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237986] [NEW] Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing hardy 8.04 over a local net (PXE) and picking up the preseed file from a url. Installing to an HP DL145 G3. (Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array E200i (SAS Controller)) /dev/cciss/c0d0. Installing from a local mirror. Boot kernel and initrd in the TFTP server are from the alternate CD: ubuntu-amd64-alternate/install/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/ An interactive (no preseed) PXE install works fine. I created a preseed file which works well for everything except partitioning. I always have to answer the "Select disk to partition:" before it will continue with the partitioner. Here are the partman lines from the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/init_automatically_partition string Guided - use entire disk d-i partman-auto/choose_recipe select Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions d-i partman/confirm boolean true d-i partman/choose_partition select Finish partitioning and write changes to disk I booted with DEBCONF_DEBUG=5 and captured this via syslog during a preseed install: Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: <-- 0 question will be asked Jun 6 17:51:17 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/expert_recipe_file Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/choose_recipe Jun 6 17:51:19 debconf: <-- 0 Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Except for having to press ENTER once, this works. (question will be asked). Then I added this line to the preseed file: d-i partman-auto/select_disk string SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array And captured this via syslog during an install: Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> INPUT critical partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 30 question skipped Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GO Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 ok Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> GET partman-auto/select_disk Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: --> METAGET partman/text/scsi_disk description Jun 6 12:38:45 debconf: <-- 0 SCSI%s (%s,%s,%s) (%s) Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' Jun 6 12:38:45 partman: Error running 'tune2fs -l /dev/cciss/c0d0' This just loops over and over (actually there are about 75 lines that loop but most of them are about the error running tune2fs). The install never goes anywhere. Let me know if you want me to attach the entire syslog. The (/dev/cciss/c0d0) isn't a difference. I've tried it with many different things in select_disk including SCSI.CCISS (-,0,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array auto SCSI.CCISS (-\,0\,0) (/dev/cciss/c0d0) - 300.0 GB Compaq Smart Array I've tried it with select and with string. Nothing changes. It just loops. Any clues? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579563 ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installation loop with preseed file or Stops at "Select disk to partition". DL145 cciss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
TJ Whatever your bug is, it's not the one referred to in this bug. The original problem is that *-server* kernels experience "Host adapter abort request" messages during bootup and fail to boot on a Dell PE2650 after the install. (The boot from CD and install work fine). but the *-generic* kernels never do. You reported a kernel panic on a Dell 6300 with a -generic kernel during an install. Is anyone actually dealing with the original bug -- which still exists in Hardy or does the Perc firmware update always fix it? If it does, we should get this onto the front page. I'm going to go do a firmware upgrade now that I've seen this with Hardy also. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149071] Re: -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts
Confirmed. I just did the same thing. Got the firmware from http://ftp.us.dell.com/scsi-raid/RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380 edited it with vi to change the shell from /bin/sh to /bin/bash made it executable extracted it with ./RAID_FRMW_LX_R168380.BIN --extract RAID (ignoring the rpm errors) cd RAID edited adalnx.sh to change the shell to bash and ran it. Then i ran ./adalnx and it flashed the controller BIOS. Now if I could just do something similar with the Remote Access card. -- -server kernel variant fails to boot on PowerEdge 2650 with AACRAID timeouts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] [NEW] firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Ubuntu 7.1. Firefox 2.0.0.12 Happened on first startup after re-installation. Displayed on Error Console. Not reproducible ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201540] Re: firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing
I should clarify that the error did not reoccur on restarting the re- installed firefox. Double clicking on the error brought up a java file that seems to deal with security policy options where nsIActiveSecurityPolicy seems to be some object type. -- firefox startup error: nsIActiveXSecurityPolicy.js missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Those two solutions aren't much good if for instance you're logged in and people start using your computer and you can't stick around to watch everything they do. With a master password on the manager you can feel free to allow then to look up clips on Youtube and not worry about them jotting down all your passwords while you're out of the room. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
I agree with you that if you've entered the master password already, the it is an issue unless you restart the browser. It would be great if there was a button or keycombo I could press to relock the password manager, but your method doesn't provide for that either so I was simply saying that it offers better protection. > It's basically a matter of how much you trust other people who you leave at your PC. > If you're paranoid about such things it's better to quickly create a new system account, lock your current window manager login, and then login to the new window manager as the new user (and make sure that your home directory permissions are secure). Well if you want to remain secure then you can't really trust them at all. Even if you trust them, you may have others who rely on you not to trust other people with that data. It's not necessary about paranoia, it could just be about security. The problem with your solution is that it will make your fiends, girlfriend, associates etc. think badly of you. You can't let people know that you are going out of your way because you don't trust them, because that offends people which will then impact on you. :) Restarting firefox is much easier to disguise. But as I said, the ideal solution would be to be able to hit a button or key combo to relock the manager. However my point was that disk encryption won't protect you in this situation at all. I'm assuming if you unmounted the encrypted folder then things would just stop working? -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Wow that's fantastic htamas! That option is very well hidden, very nice find. :) If only there was a shortcut for it. -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195698] Re: Password asked separately for each tab that requires it
Firstly you are right, I should have said "the option is quite deep in the menu system and thus may be easy for the typical user to overlook". However more importantly, I didn't not realise that clearing Authenticated Sessions also logged you out of the password manager, I had assumed it was just clearing HTTP/S Authentication sessions. This then is a more appropriate option as you have said. I have changed the defaults of what is cleared by going to Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings and unchecking everything except "Authenticated Sessions" and then I unchecked the option Preferences -> Privacy > Private Data > Settings > Ask me before clearing private data Now the [Ctrl+Shift+Del] option clears exactly what I want cleared. Thank you! Thank you so much for all the information. I was so excited when I got to the part about the extension that I went ahead and created it before reading on. I have attached the generated extension from your instructions (with the author changed to yourself though :) ). I'm sure it will be useful to somebody searching for that exact thing. So now we have a good and clear use case for continued use of the password manager combined with the option for clearing authenticated sessions regardless of weather you are using an encrypted home folder. So you're post actually put us back on topic. :) ** Attachment added: "ssdlogout.xpi" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25771803/ssdlogout.xpi -- Password asked separately for each tab that requires it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177129] Re: Laptop lid close button dosen't work
I have this same bug on a Dell L400. I'm not sure this is being classified as a kernel ACPI bug since ACPI appears to be behaving correctly; the /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state file is going true and false. But I maybe totally in the dark about what the parts are doing. hal, upon which acpid is depending for notifications, is not seeing this event. It seems like we have switched paradigms for noticing these events and some of the laptops have been left in the dust. What is the tie between kernel states of acpi devices and hal notifications? Is this kernel work or hal work? Is hal in the kernel. This bug and others like it are numerous in ubuntu land. Would more data help? I can submit the same files as above, but they are no more interesting. Thanks for all you do! Gerry (I have the added problem that once a minute hal notifies me (and acpid) that my sleep button is being pressed when it is not. When I DO press it, it notifies me then too.) -- Laptop lid close button dosen't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 The bug that this is marked as a duplicate of is completely different. This bug refers to the master password and the bug is that it is asked for, multiple times upon startup of Firefox. The other bug refers to the password prompt for a password protected proxy server and that the login is not saved once and then never asked for again. While both bugs refer to unwanted password prompts, they are clearly very different bugs. -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219757] Re: Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 195698 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195698 I found a bug which fits this one a lot better: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177175 -- Two Password Required dialog boxes are displayed on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
> sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb Thank you so much Mekk, that worked perfectly. I wish this had been in the repository as the other diff tools are no substitute for Kdiff3 -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363664] Re: xfce4-settings-helper is slow on startup
I struggled with this today. The friendly folks on irc suggested I check xfce bugzilla to see if the 4.6.1 update would fix this problem. I stumbled on this bug. http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 In it the poster discovers that the slowness problem goes away when they 1. Go to Xfc4 Settings Manager->Keyboard->Layout 2. Click 'Use system defaults' I found that neither clearing cache nor starting with a fresh .config directory helped, but that fixed it for me. I hope that short-circuits someone's long search. ** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #5040 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 -- xfce4-settings-helper is slow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278601] Re: hpijs crashed with SIGSEGV
Program crashed while canceling a print job. -- hpijs crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48773] Re: Mouse doesn't get turned off on system shutdown
With me it's not just the mouse but the whole system. It gets to "will now halt LVM Volume Group" and stops. After awhile it goes into command screen mode and just sits there until I turn the power off. Anything I'm doing wrong as I am newbie -- Mouse doesn't get turned off on system shutdown https://launchpad.net/bugs/48773 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48773] Re: [Bug 48773] Re: Mouse doesn't get turned off on system shutdown
I found the answer, well in my case at least. I had a couple of dead USB sticks (USB 1.1) attached to the machine. When I removed them everything worked fine, Might be worth a check. I am nor sure it was cos they were dead or cos they were 1.1. On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 21:25 +, Liam Legionnaire wrote: > Same with me. All USB peripherals stay powered (mouse, keyboard, drawing > tablet, usb stick, etc.) > I really would like to see this fixed, not just for the annoyance, but to > conserve the energy. > > ** Description changed: > > Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-mouse > > Since re-installing 6.06, my mouse has not been powered off on shutdown. > > System->Quit->Shut Down shuts the system off normally, except that my > optical mouse light stays on until I physically cycle the power switch > at the back of the desktop. > > It's a basic Microsoft optical wheel mouse, a few years old, and it's > been working perfectly until installation of 6.06, so I don't think it's > a hardware issue w/ the mouse. > > - In XP, 5.04 & 5.10, with exactly the same hardware, the mouse always > - shut down w/ the rest of the system. > + In Windows XP, 5.04 & 5.10, with exactly the same hardware, the mouse > + always shut down w/ the rest of the system. > -- Mouse doesn't get turned off on system shutdown https://launchpad.net/bugs/48773 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
