[Bug 1462647] Re: Native Client (NaCl) not working in Chromium Dev
NaCL will still be usable by Chrome Apps and extensions, for example Chrome Remote Desktop, which currently doesn't work with the Ubuntu version of Chromium. So there is still value in getting this working. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1462647 Title: Native Client (NaCl) not working in Chromium Dev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1462647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1694446] Re: Installer crashes when trying to upgrade 32-bit system to 64-bit
"A warning message prompted you that this could be a problem and recommended performing a bios mode install instead, but you chose not to." That's not entirely right. The warning message said that there would be a possible problem booting _other_ operating systems installed on the disk afterwards. As I had no other operating systems other than the one I was upgrading, I chose to continue. If in fact there are other reasons for not continuing in this situation, the message needs updating to be more clear and explain what to do differently . So I am reopening this bug. ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694446 Title: Installer crashes when trying to upgrade 32-bit system to 64-bit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1694446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] Re: New 64-bit 14.04 install doesn't boot
penlavch: so, let me get this straight. This bug where my computer won't boot from a particular SSD: you want me to boot the computer from a CD and see if I can reproduce the bug? And if I do reproduce the bug where my computer won't boot, you want me to run some software on this non- booted computer in order to submit a problem report? Have I got that right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New 64-bit 14.04 install doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1246272] Re: Keyboard layout changing randomly
I had the problem that the hotkey (Super+Space) was not actually changing the input method, even though the icon changed. (Selecting it from the menu worked OK). I'm not entirely sure how I fixed it, but I ran ibus-setup and set the settings to: * Customise active input methods: Off * No input methods in list * Use system keyboard layout: Off * Share the same input method among all applications: On and then rebooted. And it started working. In Language Support in the prefs, my input method system is set to Ibus. In the Text Entry prefs, I have two input sources listed - English and Bengali (Avro Phonetic), the key set to Super+Space, and Use the Same Source for All Windows selected. I'm also using a custom font. It's still true that when I select Bengali (Avro Phonetic) and click the little keyboard icon, it shows me the wrong keyboard layout (an English one of some sort). Not sure what's up with that. But at least input method switching works again! Hope this helps someone, Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246272 Title: Keyboard layout changing randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1246272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] Re: New 64-bit 14.04 install doesn't boot
** Summary changed: - New install doesn't boot + New 64-bit 14.04 install doesn't boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New 64-bit 14.04 install doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] [NEW] New install with full disk encryption doesn't boot
Public bug reported: I have a Thinkpad X230 happily running 14.04 32-bit with full disk encryption. It was an upgrade from 13.10, which also (obviously) had full disk encryption. However, I have 12GB of RAM so I wanted to switch to 64-bit. I decided the safest way was to buy a new drive and install the 64-bit version to that, then migrate my data. So I bought a Crucial SSD, made a boot USB stick of 14.04 64-bit, fitted the SSD and started the install, again requesting full disk encryption. The install proceeds fine and precisely as expected, right up to Reboot to use your new system. But then the system does not start. The first time I try and restart, immediately after install, I get the BIOS splash screen and the black with a purple border screen, but no please enter your drive password. Instead, the fan starts whirring and the machine gets hot - it seems to be pegging the CPU. In case it was doing something like encrypting all the data, I left it overnight (the second time I tried the install), but when I came back 10 hours later, I was still at the black with a purple border screen, although the CPU seemed not to be working hard any more. If I try rebooting again, I can get a GRUB screen, but if I pick Ubuntu, I get the purple border, and then Kernel panic - not syncing - No init found. And that's the message I get on each subsequent boot attempt. I can boot the machine using my old 32-bit 14.04 disk (attached in a USB3 enclosure) and examine the internal drive. However, I don't know what to look for. Using the Disks tool, I can mount the boot partition - it seems to have all the right bits, but I'm no expert. I an also unlock the encrypted partition, although I can't work out how to mount it. So I'm happy to provide more info if people just tell me what to look for. I'll also try and install _without_ FDE and see if that's the factor which makes the difference. Gerv ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New install with full disk encryption doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] Re: New install with full disk encryption doesn't boot
Turns out the FDE is a red herring. I just reinstalled without FDE and the symptoms are exactly the same. The new install has a simple 500GB ext4 partition, which I can mount using the Disks tool when booted using my old disk. It seems like all the data is there. (It also has a 13GB extended partition with a swap partition in it.) But it refuses to boot from that drive. I tried booting the drive as a raw disk using VirtualBox, but I get the same error. So I don't think it's my hardware (excepting the new SSD, of course - it could be the SSD). Gerv ** Summary changed: - New install with full disk encryption doesn't boot + New install doesn't boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New install doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] Re: New install doesn't boot
Yes, thank you, bot. If I knew which source package the problem was in, I'd be a lot closer to solving it :-) It could be the installer is writing the wrong thing; it could be grub is misinterpreting what the installer writes; I don't know. Someone help me work it out :-) Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New install doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1338942] Re: New install doesn't boot
So I tried installing 32-bit 14.04 from scratch, and it worked. For interest, I tried then installing 64-bit using the upgrade option in the installer, over the top of the 32-bit version, and it didn't work. So there is some problem with installing 64-bit 14.04 that makes it not boot much beyond Grub - can't find init. FDE doesn't make a difference. I think I've about reached the end of my debugging skills, unless there's some kernel option I can pass to get more detailed diagnostics from the boot process...? Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1338942 Title: New install doesn't boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1338942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1216978] [NEW] Installer crashes after disk write error
Public bug reported: The installer crashed after I got a disk write error installing to a USB stick. Gerv ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: ubiquity 2.14.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.331 Date: Mon Aug 26 16:25:01 2013 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 raring ubiquity-2.14.6 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216978 Title: Installer crashes after disk write error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1216978/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1179596] Re: browser needs its own UA string
Hi everyone, We at Mozilla have put a great deal of thought into our UAs for our mobile products, and have a reasonably good understanding of the trade- offs involved. Obviously your situation is different if you are building on WebKit, but we are very happy to share our experience and suggestions with whoever makes this decision. Drop me an email - g...@mozilla.org - if you are interested in that. And it is a _big_ decision - because once you choose something, you are stuck with it. If you keep tweaking it, you'll break something every time you fix something, and it will get very frustrating. Getting this wrong could seriously affect the market acceptance of your product. We'd love to have people from Ubuntu join us in our evangelism efforts to make the web more multi-browser friendly. I would strongly recommend that you implement an override mechanism as a safety valve for sites which you can't persuade to fix themselves. It's not a magic bullet for compatibility problems, but it can help. Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179596 Title: browser needs its own UA string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+bug/1179596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
This is now fixed upstream due to a bug I filed: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693293 Gerv ** Bug watch added: Ghostscript (AFPL) Bugzilla #693293 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693293 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
toomanypets: thank you for taking the time to look at this bug. pdftops does indeed seem to work. But can this bug be passed upstream to the GhostScript developers? Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
I'd like to get this sent upstream. What's the procedure for that? Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] [NEW] pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
Public bug reported: (Using Ubuntu Precise 12.04 LTS on a Thinkpad X220) The attached PDF, when viewed in evince, says in the Properties: Paper Size: 496x437mm That is correct. When I convert it to PS using: pdf2ps frame_base.pdf and then view the PS file in a text editor, it says at the start: %%BoundingBox: 0 0 595 842 I believe this is measured in points, where 1cm is 28 points, so this translates to 212mm x 301mm. Which is not the same. This is a problem because the poster program uses this info to try and work out how best to split it up into sheets for a poster, and one gets very weird results. I tried reporting this bug at bugs.ghostscript.com and their tracker said that if I got the ghostscript from Ubuntu, I should report it to you first. Gerv ** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
** Attachment added: frame_base.pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257081/+files/frame_base.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] CupsErrorLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CupsErrorLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257640/+files/CupsErrorLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise running-unity ** Description changed: (Using Ubuntu Precise 12.04 LTS on a Thinkpad X220) The attached PDF, when viewed in evince, says in the Properties: Paper Size: 496x437mm That is correct. When I convert it to PS using: pdf2ps frame_base.pdf and then view the PS file in a text editor, it says at the start: %%BoundingBox: 0 0 595 842 I believe this is measured in points, where 1cm is 28 points, so this translates to 212mm x 301mm. Which is not the same. This is a problem because the poster program uses this info to try and work out how best to split it up into sheets for a poster, and one gets very weird results. I tried reporting this bug at bugs.ghostscript.com and their tracker said that if I got the ghostscript from Ubuntu, I should report it to you first. Gerv + --- + ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu11 + Architecture: i386 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 + EcryptfsInUse: Yes + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) + Lpstat: + device for Canon-MP530: usb://Canon/MP530?serial=21F6EEinterface=1 + device for ML-2855: usb://Samsung/ML-2855%20Series?serial=Z2MFBKES901707Y + device for Officejet-5600-series: hp:/usb/Officejet_5600_series?serial=CN6BND70Z904B2 + device for Officejet-5600-series-Fax: hpfax:/usb/Officejet_5600_series?serial=CN6BND70Z904B2 + MachineType: LENOVO 4287CTO + Package: ghostscript 9.05~dfsg-0ubuntu4.1 + PackageArchitecture: i386 + Papersize: a4 + PpdFiles: + Canon-MP530: Canon PIXMA MP530 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.8-pre1 + Officejet-5600-series: HP Officejet 5600 Series, hpcups 3.12.2 + ML-2855: Samsung ML-2851ND Foomatic/Postscript (recommended) + Officejet-5600-series-Fax: HP Fax hpcups + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + TERM=xterm + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic-pae root=UUID=ccfdd2a5-39c3-4c9f-bd3c-ccf54bcbe085 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-27.43-generic-pae 3.2.21 + Tags: precise running-unity + Uname: Linux 3.2.0-27-generic-pae i686 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo www-data + dmi.bios.date: 10/18/2011 + dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO + dmi.bios.version: 8DET54WW (1.24 ) + dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available + dmi.board.name: 4287CTO + dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO + dmi.board.version: Not Available + dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information + dmi.chassis.type: 10 + dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO + dmi.chassis.version: Not Available + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr8DET54WW(1.24):bd10/18/2011:svnLENOVO:pn4287CTO:pvrThinkPadX220:rvnLENOVO:rn4287CTO:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: + dmi.product.name: 4287CTO + dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X220 + dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257639/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257641/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257642/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Locale.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Locale.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257643/+files/Locale.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257645/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] PrintingPackages.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: PrintingPackages.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257646/+files/PrintingPackages.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257644/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257647/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257648/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257649/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257651/+files/UdevLog.txt ** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667/+attachment/3257650/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035667] Re: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong
OK, what now? :-) Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035667 Title: pdf2ps seems to get bounding box wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1035667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986205] Re: libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls (libdbalo.so missing from libreoffice-base-core)
This problem also occurs with a very simple spreadsheet (available on request) which just has numbers, dates, currencies and a few simple formulae. So it's not just text documents with form controls. Installing libreoffice-base (which pulls in a load of Java) fixes it. Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205 Title: libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls (libdbalo.so missing from libreoffice-base-core) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 867556] Re: Oneiric mouse sensitivity no (or reversed) effect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 28052 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/28052 I don't think this is a duplicate. This bug is particularly about the fact that the way to get a fast mouse is to set sensitivity to low, which is not particularly intuitive. I would expect high sensitivity to correspond to faster, 'jumpier' motions. Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/867556 Title: Oneiric mouse sensitivity no (or reversed) effect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/867556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786867] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools Automatic report. No problem for user... Lubuntu + LibreOffice 3.4 Beta installed ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 AptOrdering: initramfs-tools: Configure plymouth: Configure plymouth-theme-ubuntu-text: Configure plymouth-label: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Sun May 22 18:24:14 2011 DpkgTerminalLog: Paramétrage de initramfs-tools (0.98.8ubuntu3) ... update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) lzma: Encoder error: -2147467259 dpkg : erreur de traitement de initramfs-tools (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - i386 (20101203) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: initramfs-tools Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786867 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786867] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786867 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705845] Re: Suspend on Thinkpad X200s worked in 2.6.35-24-generic but no longer in 2.6.35-25-generic
The kernel currently in proposed, Linux kitten 2.6.35-26-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Sun Jan 30 08:10:51 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux, fixes the problem for me on an X200. Thank you :-) Gerv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705845 Title: Suspend on Thinkpad X200s worked in 2.6.35-24-generic but no longer in 2.6.35-25-generic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 645521] Re: Gparted crashing on start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 609447 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609447 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 609447 gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke() * You can subscribe to bug 609447 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/609447/+subscribe -- Gparted crashing on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641576] Re: gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 609447 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609447 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 609447 gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke() * You can subscribe to bug 609447 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/609447/+subscribe -- gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635743] Re: gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 609447 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609447 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 609447 gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke() * You can subscribe to bug 609447 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/609447/+subscribe -- gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217941] Re: Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake!
This bug is no longer relevant now the close box has moved, and is no longer in a sensible Fitt's Law position :-| Gerv ** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483606] Re: printing only prints first page of document
Reopening. I also have this problem since upgrading to Ubuntu 10.04. evince (only; OpenOffice.org works fine) will only print the first page of any job. I'm about to run the request apport command. Gerv ** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- printing only prints first page of document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483606] Re: printing only prints first page of document
Hmm - I can't. apport says: You are not the reporter or a subscriber [I am a subscriber] of this problem report, or the bug is a duplicate [it is not] or is already closed [it is not]. So I don't know why I can't send you the info. Gerv -- printing only prints first page of document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563161] Re: Must reenable desktop effects with every restart in ubuntu 10.04 lucid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 572617 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572617 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 572617 [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade -- Must reenable desktop effects with every restart in ubuntu 10.04 lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563161 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538499] Re: warning spam on stdout: CRITICAL **: murrine_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height = -1' failed
Also a problem with the editor 'scite'. Gerv -- warning spam on stdout: CRITICAL **: murrine_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height = -1' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463739] Re: Installed is spelt as intalled
** Attachment added: Screenshot of problem http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34625029/intalled.png -- Installed is spelt as intalled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463739] [NEW] Installed is spelt as intalled
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center In the Software Centre UI, installed is spelt as intalled in my copy of 1.0.2. Screenshot attached. Gerv ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installed is spelt as intalled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463284] Re: Menu, description, and About box disagree about what the program is called
This bug is about the text in Ubuntu Software Centre, not the text in the About: box of File-Roller itself. Although it should probably be made consistent with whatever. Ideally, Ubuntu would not have an Archive Manager at all - the default file manager would seamlessly deal with archives. But if it has to have one, I would suggest Compressed File Manager as the best name for the application, for those who might not know what it does. Gerv -- Menu, description, and About box disagree about what the program is called https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451447] Re: landscape-sysinfo crashed with ImportError in module()
It happened for me during the upgrade too. I may have misunderstood what the people above are saying, but it only crashes once during the upgrade, and then never again doesn't sound like a good reason to WONTFIX this bug. Things crashing during upgrades is ugly and unprofessional, and scares people that the upgrade hasn't worked right. Gerv -- landscape-sysinfo crashed with ImportError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 436230] Re: thinkpad x40: backlight does not work after suspend
This also affects me, on exactly the same hardware (Thinkpad X40). As it is 100% reproducible, and the only way to cure it is a reboot, it effectively makes suspend useless on this machine. Things that don't fix it: - Double console switch - Executing xrandr Please let me know if I can be of assistance in debugging. Gerv -- thinkpad x40: backlight does not work after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367465] Re: wesnoth toggles from fullscreen to windowed randomly
Right, but wesnoth and screensavers are incompatible is not a reasonable 'solution' to this problem. Does this bug need to be passed upstream? Or is someone on the Ubuntu project responsible for it? Gerv -- wesnoth toggles from fullscreen to windowed randomly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367465 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361920] Re: suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40
** Changed in: linux-ports (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230530] Re: Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately
Joel: what information are you looking for? Gerv -- Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290728] Re: xvidcap fails to record multi- or single- frame
This is still broken on 9.04 - when you try and record a video, you get: xtoffmpeg.c add_video_stream(): video codec not found I'm not the only person seeing this; see this forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1047614 Gerv -- xvidcap fails to record multi- or single- frame https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361920] Re: suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40
Luke: what makes you think that would change things? Gerv -- suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355086] Re: Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish
I agree with Rhonda - changing the directory name seems very shortsighted. a) What happens when we get to Wesnoth 1.8? b) Is it really impossible to create saved game files so that they have versioning info, and the game can say sorry, we can't open that file now? It seems to be it does this anyway - so why on earth change the directory so that code becomes useless? Rhonda: I realise you have already spent time on this, but might it be worth checking with upstream to see if it would be OK to switch the data directory back? Then people would get a sensible error message instead of just thinking all their games had vanished. Also, while I'm here, if there's any way of changing the packaging so a small update to the main game doesn't require re-downloading all the music, that would be very cool too :-) Gerv -- Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217936] Re: Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth
Savvas: that's great, but it's not exactly something the average user could do. Either we need to make gnome-schedule drag-and-drop (drag an icon onto it and it sets up a scheduled task), pre-populate it with the most commonly-requested tasks, or we need to build this in to Update Manager. Gerv -- Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361920] [NEW] suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40
Public bug reported: My IBM Thinkpad X40 occasionally fails to suspend properly - the suspend light flashes but the suspend process never completes. On occasion, it also fails to resume properly. I'm not entirely sure which failure this apport-generated crash refers to, but I think it's the suspend. Gerv ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 Package: linux-image-2.6.28-6-386 2.6.28-6.18 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) SourcePackage: linux-ports Tags: resume suspend Title: suspend/resume failure Uname: Linux 2.6.28-6-386 i686 UserGroups: ** Affects: linux-ports (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 resume suspend -- suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361920] Re: suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25506607/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25506608/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25506609/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: SleepLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25506610/SleepLog.txt -- suspend/resume failure on Thinkpad X40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355086] Re: Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish
I realise conversion is hard/impossible, and I agree you can't be expected to support both versions. But I would happily have delayed my upgrade to Jaunty by a week if I had known that this was coming. So I guess what I'm really looking for is a warning at the start of the upgrade process. Is there any facility for that sort of thing? Also, I'm looking for Wesnoth, when I start it with old saved games, to say You have old saved games. Sorry you can't play them. You need to downgrade to 1.4 or another helpful message, rather than just pretend that they aren't there. I would hope that's not too big a patch. I agree that's a bug for upstream rather than the Debian or Ubuntu maintainer, though. Gerv -- Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 336461] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Ok, try this. Gerv ** Attachment added: error.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24836218/error.txt -- package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 336461] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
So the issue, then, is to figure out why the upgrade process threw up a dialog saying there was an error, and yet the process continues when the dialog is dismissed and, when I rerun the post-inst script as you requested, there is no error now. :-) If we can eliminate the error dialog during upgrade, we will have fixed this bug. Gerv -- package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355086] [NEW] Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wesnoth I have completed 23 out of 25 scenarios in the Wesnoth campaign Heir to the Throne. I then upgraded to the Jaunty beta, which replaces Wesnoth 1.4 with 1.6. Now, none of my saved games are available in the GUI, and so I can't load them! This campaign took rather a long time to play. If this were my only computer, I would cry. Fortunately, I have another one and can use rsync to move the saves across and finish the campaign. But other people will not be so lucky. There needs to be some sort of warning, or a conversion script, or the ability to keep 1.4 installed as well... or something! Just losing all the saved games (although the data remains in the Wesnoth directory, at least at first) and not telling the user anything is unacceptable IMO. ** Affects: wesnoth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Wesnoth save game file format in jaunty is incompatible (1.4 - 1.6) and saves just vanish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 336461] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
The CC list seems to suggest lots of people seeing this when upgrading to jaunty. I certainly did, but didn't file a dupe because this bug came up. Here's the results of running the command (not as root) in the previous comment. Gerv ** Attachment added: error.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24760522/error.txt -- package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25105] Re: incorrect test page printing with SAMSUNG ML1210
I have a Samsung ML-1210 and am _still_ getting this problem in Intrepid. In fact, it was a factor in my getting lost on Saturday (couldn't read the directions). Changing the halftoning algorithm to Standard sorted it out, which is great, but _please_ can you fix the problem for all the people who haven't got the skill and patience to find this bug report? Thanks :-) Gerv -- incorrect test page printing with SAMSUNG ML1210 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295389] Re: This version is extremely out of date
Note that updated packages already exist, if this helps. Dominique Corbex writes: I've made gnomesword-2.4.1 and sword-1.5.11 packages for Debian Lenny/unstable and Ubuntu Hardy/intrepid. They are available for download at the usual place: http://dominique.corbex.net/gnomesword/ or add the relative source For debian unstable: deb http://dominique.corbex.net/gnomesword/debian unstable main For ubuntu hardy: deb http://dominique.corbex.net/gnomesword/ubuntu hardy main For ubuntu intrepid: deb http://dominique.corbex.net/gnomesword/ubuntu intrepid main -- This version is extremely out of date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217941] Re: Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake!
This bug is still present in Intrepid, because non-maximised windows still have rounded corners in the default Human theme. Gerv -- Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291655] [NEW] sources.list missing hardy-updates for universe
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic Bug 255738 has the details. Basically, the sources.list of several people running Hardy seems to be missing hardy-updates for Universe, even though Synaptic implies that they are enabled. This eventually causes problems with package version mismatches, the symptom of which is an inability to install OpenJDK. Now it's definitely a synaptic bug that it doesn't fix this problem when you run it, but it could be that the original cause is elsewhere (the upgrade process from gutsy?). So I'm starting by filing the bug against synaptic but you may have to move it. See the below comment mostly copied from bug 255738: I'm missing hardy-updates in universe in my sources.list. I've never manually removed this as far as I remember. Could it be that the upgrade process doesn't set up sources.list correctly? The worrying thing is, if I fire up Synaptic and look at the Repository configuration, I have the following boxes marked as checked: Ubuntu Software tab: main, universe, multiverse, source code Updates tab: hardy-security hardy-updates And yet my sources.list doesn't have hardy-updates enabled for universe. So there's something wrong with Synaptic's checking and mapping to those checkboxes too - it should flag up this problem. My broken sources.list is attached to the other bug. Gerv ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sources.list missing hardy-updates for universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
Stefan: I think you've nailed it. I just checked my sources.list and I'm missing hardy-updates in universe. I've never manually removed this as far as I remember. Could it be that the upgrade process doesn't set up sources.list correctly? The worrying thing is, if I fire up Synaptic and look at the Repository configuration, I have the following boxes marked as checked: Ubuntu Software tab: main, universe, multiverse, source code Updates tab: hardy-security hardy-updates And yet my sources.list doesn't have hardy-updates enabled for universe. So there's something wrong with Synaptic's checking and mapping to those checkboxes too - it should flag up this problem. I've attached my sources.list. Gerv ** Attachment added: Faulty sources.list http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18817257/sources.list -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
This bug definitely isn't invalid, although it's also not an openjdk-6 bug. Reopening so that someone more knowledgeable can direct it to the right place (upgrades? synaptic?). Gerv ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
How could the problem be with the mirror? As far as I understand it, this is what happens: - Someone has a fully-updated Ubuntu but no Java installed - This means they have tzdata-2008g (I think it's g) - They try and install Java using apt-get - openjdk-jre-6-headless has an = dependency on tzdata-2008b - openjdk-jre-6-headless refuses to install due to a version mismatch - and apt-get won't or can't downgrade the tzdata package to fix it Result: you have to downgrade manually. I guess the only reason it could be a mirror issue is if the problem had actually been fixed but the mirror didn't have an updated version of openjdk-jre-6-headless. I think that's highly unlikely because the several people reporting the problem will be using different mirrors. And I get updates to my machine all the time, so it's not like the mirror is dead. Gerv -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
I'm using gb.archive.ubuntu.com, not some unofficial mirror - it really should be working. Evidence that it's not a mirror problem: the following directories are (as far as I can see) identical between gb.archive and us.archive: http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/t/tzdata/ http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/t/tzdata/ http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/ http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/o/openjdk-6/ If I were to change mirror, how would I do it? And what actions should I take to test if the problem has gone away? (Currently, apt-get upgrade says that tzdata has been kept back, if that's useful info.) Gerv -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
I checked, and hardy-updates and hardy-security are uncommented. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show openjdk-6-jdk |grep Version Version: 6b09-0ubuntu2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I removed gb., did apt-get update, and then apt-get upgrade. It still told me tzdata has been kept back. So I ran a dist-upgrade and got the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED openjdk-6-jre-headless openjdk-6-jre-lib tzdata-java The following packages will be upgraded: tzdata 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/659kB of archives. After this operation, 81.9MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n Abort. It really looks like the problem is not solved - moving to the latest tzdata is still going to uninstall my openjdk. Let me know if there's more testing I can do. Gerv -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
This keeps periodically re-breaking itself when one updates the system. To fix it this time I had to do: sudo apt-get uninstall tz-data sudo apt-get install tzdata=2008b-1ubuntu1 sudo apt-get install openjdk-6-jre-headless Gerv ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
The problem is that the current stable release of openjdk for hardy has an = dependency on an obsolete version of tzdata. Java is, without manual intervention, uninstallable on the flagship current release of Ubuntu, and has been so now for two months. Gerv -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220819] Re: exim4 cannot be removed, if stopped
I just got hit by this. Thank you to Daniel for providing a fix. I know how annoying this sort of thing is in the Mozilla bug system, but: does Ubuntu have an exim maintainer at all? Six months for a two- line fix with a patch provided? Not too impressive... Gerv -- exim4 cannot be removed, if stopped https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255738] Re: openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008
There's another solution here: http://ubuntu-virginia.ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5792430postcount=7 Matthias: I don't know what you mean by not a problem with openjdk-6. It's a problem with the packages which make up Hardy, which is the current stable release of Ubuntu and therefore vaguely important. OpenJDK is simply not installable, without doing one of these workaround solutions. -- openjdk-6-jre is uninstalable as of Thu Aug 7 14:16:14 UTC 2008 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245696] [NEW] gnomesword2 crashes when I click Hebrew text
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnomesword gnomesword2 crashes immediately when I single-click (not drag) on the main Bible text display panel when it is displaying the WLC. It only crashes when I click the Hebrew; clicking the English chapter headings and verse numbers is fine. Clicking Hebrew in the Parallel view is also fine (although it uses a different font, and I haven't managed to work out how to get the two to match, so that may be relevant.) I believe the font in the main view is Ezra SIL. This is Gnomesword 2.2.3, as shipped with Hardy. The console displays the following: (gnomesword2:13761): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_convert: assertion `str != NULL' failed Segmentation fault I tried installing the debug package and debugging it using GDB. Triggering the crash locked up my desktop; I had to switch to another virtual console and kill gdb. The output was as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:usr$ gdb gnomesword2 21 | tee ~/gdb-gnomesword.txt GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i486-linux-gnu... (gdb) handle SIG33 pass nostop noprint SignalStop Print Pass to program Description SIG33 NoNo Yes Real-time event 33 (gdb) set pagination 0 (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/gnomesword2 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb68a7740 (LWP 13544)] (gnomesword2:13544): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_convert: assertion `str != NULL' failed Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb68a7740 (LWP 13544)] 0xb7010283 in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:usr$ ** Affects: gnomesword (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnomesword2 crashes when I click Hebrew text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230530] Re: Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately
John: I think you've mistriaged this. I don't know what the Adobe Flash Extension Kit is, and I wasn't using it. Nothing showed up in the top right hand corner of the page. He visited YouTube, and it told him (in the page) either JS is off or you need an upgraded Flash, and gave him a link to Macromedia. Neither Firefox nor Ubuntu did anything special to prompt Flash installation. Exactly the same problem was reported in the great Ubuntu Girlfriend Experiment: http://contentconsumer.com/2008/04/27/is-ubuntu-useable-enough-for-my-girlfriend/ (Second task) In addition, after installing flashplugin-nonfree via Synaptic we didn't see any light bulb suggesting that Firefox be restarted. It's possible we may have missed it, but I don't think so. Regardless, a small lightbulb appearing wouldn't be enough - you need a desktop notification. I work for the Mozilla Foundation, so I do know a bit about how this works. :-) Gerv -- Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230530] [NEW] Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately
Public bug reported: I did a usability test recently with my housemate, who has never used Linux before. We installed Hardy on his Dell laptop after the Windows install died, and then I watched his first half an hour while giving him tasks to do. This bug comes out of that experience. a) The installation process for Flash in Firefox, when prompted via YouTube, sucks. YouTube gives you a link to the Macromedia website, which (if you can find your way round it) gives you .tar.gz, rpm or yum. Not that my housemate knows what any of those are anyway. We need a process as smooth as the codec download stuff. c) (The thing this bug is about) Once you've installed flashplugin- nonfree, Firefox still doesn't work. You have to restart Firefox. But he didn't know that. He assumed it hadn't worked. Either: - The installation should end with a screen saying now restart Firefox or - It should Just Work(TM). Gerv ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Installing Macromedia flash player doesn't cause Flash to work immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217936] Re: Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth
Nothing so complicated. Let's not let the best be the enemy of the good. I'm just asking for a delay mechanism (Start at time X, or Start in X hours). Gerv -- Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217943] Re: Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300
Seems to work with the final Hardy kernel. Yay! Gerv ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
...and it works again, with the final Hardy kernel. shrug Gerv ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
'linux-source-2.6.24' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'linux' instead. Huh? How can linux-source be a binary package? :-| Oh well, hope it's in the right place now. Gerv -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
Ah, maybe that's why no-one was looking at my bug. Switching package to linux-source-2.6.24. Gerv ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: linux-source-2.6.20 = linux -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
Reopening. The beta kernels seem to alternate between working and not working. At the moment (2.6.24-16 and 2.6.24-15) they are not working, so I'm reopening this bug. 2.6.24-14 does work. Gerv ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = New -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211302] Re: [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again
Having looked at the code in gnome-power-manager, the first error in my log file could be bogus. It looks like this error comes up if it receives two commands too quickly (inside the timeout value). The first suspend may have been initiated pretty quickly after the previous resume, which is why the message appeared on suspend rather than resume. It seems odd that the error comes up telling you to try again, but then the suspend/resume succeeds anyway... I'll let someone who knows what they are doing take it from here :-) Gerv -- [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211302] Re: [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again
Taking my cue from the original reporter, here is a full log of gnome-power-manager --no-daemon --verbose --debug power gpm.txt 21 It contains two suspends. On the first, the error popped up just as the screen was fading out to suspend. On the second, it appeared when the desktop came back on the resume. Let me know if there's more information you need. Gerv ** Attachment added: gpm.2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13502558/gpm.2.txt -- [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217936] Re: Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth
That's handy to know. Although it seems to me that internet tariffs with unlimited time and pay-per-GB time are reasonably common, so it would be useful if update-manager had a GUI option to set a time at which to start the process. Or even a way to say Run an update at time X:XX every Y days. Gerv -- Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211302] Re: [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again
I see exactly the same thing on my X40. (Rather unhelpful as an error message...) Let me know if I can help debug. -- [hardy] resume displays Policy timeout is not valid. Please wait a few seconds and try again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211302 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217936] [NEW] Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Downloads via update-manager can be hundreds of megabytes or even gigabytes, particularly if one is helping test and a lot of packages are changing. On the plan I have, bandwidth is free from midnight to 8am but not at other times. So I would like to do the downloading during this period. However, I don't want to have to stay up until midnight to set it off. If there was a command-line switch for do all the downloads, no questions asked I could use sleep or some other delaying script. That would be fine. But there is no such option. Can we have one please, or some other mechanism by which to delay the upgrade process to a certain time? Gerv ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Allow delay of update-manager download start to use cheap bandwidth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217941] [NEW] Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: metacity Scenario: - You are using the default Ubuntu theme, which has rounded corners for windows - You have a maximised window for application A and, in front of it, a non-maximised window for application B which is positioned in the top right corner using the neat sticky/snap-to feature - You smash your mouse into the top right, taking advantage of Fitts Law, and click to close application B Expected: Application B closes Actual: Application A closes, because the corners are rounded and so you actually hit the close button of the application behind! This is really counter-intuitive. If you want to have rounded corners, fine, but you need to keep the target area for the close button the same, and square. It's caught me enough times now that I've switched to UbuntuClassic, which doesn't have rounded corners. Gerv ** Affects: metacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Rounded corners for some apps on maximised windows mean you close the app behind by mistake! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217943] Re: Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300
** Attachment added: dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13475245/dmesg.txt -- Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217943] [NEW] Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager In Gutsy, I was surprised and pleased to find that suspend (suspend-to- RAM) started working on my Dell Dimension 8300 desktop. This was wonderful. However, it's no longer working in Gutsy. When I try and resume, the hard disk ticks but nothing ever comes back. I followed the instructions here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelSuspend Here is the dmesg.txt from the successful boot following the failed boot; hopefully, it has extracted the information about the failing driver from the RTC. I also attach an lspci -vvv. Please let me know what other info you need. Gerv ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217943] Re: Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300
And here is lspci.txt. It would be really great if this was made to work again. I hate having to wait over a minute to get my computer working... Gerv ** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13475255/lspci.txt -- Suspend no longer works in Hardy on Dell Dimension 8300 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197236] Re: [Gutsy] Error: /rangecheck in --xyshow--
Indeed, fixed in Hardy. Gerv ** Changed in: cairo (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- [Gutsy] Error: /rangecheck in --xyshow-- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
You didn't say whether from the broken boot or the good boot. lspci isn't available on the broken boot, and I have no way of getting the dmesg output out of the computer because I can't access my disks or mount a USB drive. So here are the files from a good boot. Gerv ** Attachment added: dmesg from booting last good kernel http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13110398/dmesg.txt -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
** Attachment added: lspci -vvv from booting last good kernel http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13110400/lspci-vvv.txt -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
Let me know if there's anything else you need. I could probably manually copy out the last few lines of dmesg output from the bad boot, or grep it for particular strings, if that would help. Gerv -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
I've just updated to the latest packages, and 2.6.24-14 boots fine for me. Are you still interested in the dmesg output from the boot of 2.6.24-12? Gerv -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
There doesn't seem to be a works for me status, so I'll go with fix committed. Gerv ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208222] Re: Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta)
cough I know you guys are busy and it's just been a weekend, but I would have thought that your soon-to-be-released operating system makes my machine unbootable bugs might attract a certain amount of interest :-) Or at least being allocated an Importance... Gerv -- Boot failure: hard disk does not exist (Hardy beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
