[Bug 1554652] Re: nautilus-share broken with libpam-smbpass removed
Forgot to mention: this is with Ubuntu 20.04. And since I upgraded my main system 14.04->16.04->18.04->20.04 I also confirmed the brokenness in a VM with a fresh 20.04 setup, just to convince myself that this issue actually happens out-of-the-box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554652 Title: nautilus-share broken with libpam-smbpass removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-share/+bug/1554652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1554652] Re: nautilus-share broken with libpam-smbpass removed
Wow, this is a frustating issue! It took me hours to figure out, simply because I couldn't believe what most solutions for older Ubuntu releases told me: it's broken out of the box and I need to fiddle with samba internals. Yes a simple "sudo smbpasswd -a myusername" is sufficient to make it work (with authenticated shares). But there is no indication whatsoever in the GUI for this! It even proposes to install samba in the first place! It unequivocally passes the message "This is a nice GUI and it takes care of this. No need to worry." But the exact opposite is the case. IMHO this is worse than having no GUI. Without a GUI I know that I just have to do a quick google search and follow some instructions (set up samba...) and all is well in a few minutes or half an hour. At least it's straightforward. I'm a seasoned Linux user, but the current GUI sent me in all the wrong directions. It actively suggests that it takes care of everything, so I thought it'd be highly counterproductive to get in its way and edit samba's configuration myself. (Too many cooks...) I see that there are longstanding technical issues with the connection to PAM and those may be hard to fix. I totally accept that! But please, please, at the very least add some tooltip or popup dialog or text label (or modify an existing one) that informs the user that he is expected to manually add a samba user&password! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554652 Title: nautilus-share broken with libpam-smbpass removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-share/+bug/1554652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1602941] Re: Draw cannot be loaded in 16.04 (Repackage needed since gcl has changed?)
Is there any progress on this issue? Or maybe there's a workaround? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602941 Title: Draw cannot be loaded in 16.04 (Repackage needed since gcl has changed?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maxima/+bug/1602941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1510760] Re: gpssync plugin missing from kipi-plugins in 15.10
Wow, this is a major regression, at least for my personal use. I've recently upgraded from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS and now my photo workflow is partly broken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510760 Title: gpssync plugin missing from kipi-plugins in 15.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/+bug/1510760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611363] Re: vim.gtk3 crashes frequently with SIGSEGV in ffi_call_unix64()
I forgot to add a reference to vim's bugtracker on github: https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/851 but as I said before, "libunity-gtk3-parser.so.0" seems to make it Ubuntu-specific. ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Bug watch added: github.com/vim/vim/issues #851 https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/851 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611363 Title: vim.gtk3 crashes frequently with SIGSEGV in ffi_call_unix64() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/1611363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1143495] Re: udisks reporting input/output error that seems to be nonsense
I tried disabling udisks's checking of SMART attributes: open gnome-
disk-utility ("Disks"), select the SSD, click the "hamburger" icon in
the top right corner, SMART, disable. But unfortunately it is
automatically re-enabled after a reboot.
Is there a workaround?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1143495
Title:
udisks reporting input/output error that seems to be nonsense
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/1143495/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1143495] Re: udisks reporting input/output error that seems to be nonsense
Hi, my 16.04 is suffering from this bug even though a fix has been released (apparently) 3 years ago. Here's a (slightly sanitized) snippet of the syslog: === Jul 19 15:06:48 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 13 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:06:57 udisksd[2434]: Error performing housekeeping for drive /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: Error updating SMART data: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:07:18 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:08:20 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 2 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:09:21 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:12:25 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 6 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:12:32 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 194 Temperature_Celsius changed from 38 to 40 Jul 19 15:12:32 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], Read SMART Self-Test Log worked again, warning condition reset after 1 email Jul 19 15:12:32 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], Read Summary SMART Error Log failed Jul 19 15:12:32 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel changed from 68 to 66 Jul 19 15:12:32 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sdb [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 194 Temperature_Celsius changed from 32 to 34 Jul 19 15:12:33 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], SMART Prefailure Attribute: 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate changed from 120 to 99 Jul 19 15:12:33 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 194 Temperature_Celsius changed from 36 to 38 Jul 19 15:12:33 smartd[1034]: Device: /dev/sdc [SAT], SMART Usage Attribute: 195 ECC_Uncorr_Error_Count changed from 120 to 99 Jul 19 15:12:56 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:14:59 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 4 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:15:29 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:16:31 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 2 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:16:57 udisksd[2434]: Error performing housekeeping for drive /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: Error updating SMART data: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:17:01 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:17:32 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:21:07 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 7 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:21:37 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:22:08 udisksd[2434]: Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0) Jul 19 15:26:44 udisksd[2434]: message repeated 9 times: [ Error updating ATA smart for /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/KINGSTON_SUV400S37480G_50026B72650C5002: sk_disk_smart_status: Input/output error (udisks-error-quark, 0)] Jul 19 15:26:57 udisksd[2434]: Error performing housekeeping for drive /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/dr
[Bug 1569724] Re: noatime option
I've stumbled upon the same issue. Here's what I found: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs- snapshot/+question/263994 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/833980 In my opinion "older than" should NOT imply "last accessed/used". Such a feature should be taken care of separately / optionally. I'd guess that most users use apt-btrfs-snapshot exclusively in order to revert their system in case of an update gone wrong. In this use case, atime is of no practical use whatsoever. (Of course some users will use apt-btrfs- snapshot to switch between different versions of their OS and this should be supported, but preferably not at the expense of the "main" feature.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569724 Title: noatime option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/1569724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1072206] Re: [nvidia] Window content is black or transparent
Hi, I wasn't following this bug until today when I thought enough is enough. (It's been annoying me for quite some time) I'm skeptical of the "fix released" status, since I am *still* experiencing the described behaviour: black or transparent windows. Ubuntu 14.04 compiz 1:0.9.11.3+14.04.20150313-0ubuntu1 nvidia-304-updates 304.125-0ubuntu0.0.2 Thanks to everybody for investigating this non-critical but very annoying bug! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072206 Title: [nvidia] Window content is black or transparent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1072206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157002] Re: gimp does not works with xscanimage anymore
@Saverio: thanks for the workaround! It really seems to be a minor UI fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157002 Title: gimp does not works with xscanimage anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/157002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 718427] Re: recoll slows system to a crawl
I think I'm seeing the same behaviour as the original reporter: recoll is causing huge amounts of IO, which really doesn't play nice with the rest of the system. I recently moved my /home from an SSD (unencrypted) to a classic HDD (luks-encrypted) and now my system often slows down to a (temporary) halt: programs being grayed out while actively working with them. Whenever this happens I see massive iowait caused by recoll. I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 on an i5 with 8GB of RAM and a Seagate Momentus 7200.4 drive. (The system itself resides on a first-gen Sandforce SSD) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718427 Title: recoll slows system to a crawl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recoll/+bug/718427/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270185] Re: sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not
Sorry, I've finally found the issue on my system: /etc/sane.d/snapscan.conf had
the wrong permissions. (But that's my fault, not Ubuntu's!)
Running "SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=128 scanimage -L" put me on the right track.
("configuration file not found")
Please ignore my previous comment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270185
Title:
sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/270185/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270185] Re: sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not
I'm also affected by this bug: Epson Perfection 3490 Photo as regular user (member of "scanner" group): $ sane-find-scanner [...] could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 010:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0122 [EPSON Scanner]) at libusb:001:002 could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 001:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) [...] $ scanimage -L No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). $ls -l /dev/bus/usb/001/002 crw-rw-r--+ 1 root root 189, 1 Sep 7 21:15 /dev/bus/usb/001/002 Does this device correspond to my scanner?. Shouldn't it be owned by the scanner group? (But changing group ownership to scanner doesn't fix the scanimage -L issue.) Before the update to 14.04, scanning worked just fine. It's a regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270185 Title: sane-find-scanner sees scanner, scanimage -L does not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/270185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99437] Re: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
I had this same issue with a CIFS mount. An easy solution/workaround can be found here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cifs-utils/+bug/661025/comments/4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437 Title: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554204] Re: gvfs to smb location is horribly slow
Hi, I'm experiencing exactly the same problem in Maverick: gvfs mounted: 1MiB/s (nautilus or command line) mount.cifs: 3.4MiB/s (nautilus or command line) Could somebody confirm this issue and mark it as such? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554204 Title: gvfs to smb location is horribly slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292450] Re: Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics
I've solved this issue on my Ideapad by using the -lpiacompat kernel instead of the default -lpia. I tried this after playing around with the "normal" 386 build of intrepid which didn't lock up either. -- Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220657] Re: reduce backlight brightness / dim display when idle
Oh well, I got confused from all the different versions I'm currently running. In 8.04 (netbook remix 1.01) screen dimming is not yet implemented and the Ubuntu version in which it was working was actually 8.10. So as far as I am concerned it's working as intended, but still it's neither documented nor configurable. Anyway, I'm very sorry for the noise. -- reduce backlight brightness / dim display when idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220657] Re: reduce backlight brightness / dim display when idle
I can only concur that this is still an issue. Why is it still marked as INCOMPLETE? What's the missing info? I'm using the Ubuntu Netbook Remix 1.01 (lpia, based on 8.04) on an Ideapad s10e and the screen is never dimmed. I think (but can't be sure due to inexistent documentation!) what it should look like: when I'm running a "normal" 8.04 (from USB, using unetbootin) the screen is dimmed to complete blackness after a few seconds of inactivity. I'd really like to debug/fix this issue since it could probably save quite some energy. However I don't know where to start looking since this feature seems to be neither documented nor configurable (timeout, how much dimming). Where do I find this "brightness applet" that was mentioned in comment #3? -- reduce backlight brightness / dim display when idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292450] Re: Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics
I've just realized that I'm in fact not using the normal 386 build, but the special lpia-architecture used in the netbook remix. So now I'm wondering if I should file a separate bug report for the netbook remix or if somebody could mark the netbook-remix as being also affected by this issue. (I installed my system by booting from a USB key loaded with the current Canonical-provided UNR-image: http://oem- images.canonical.com/unr/unr-1.0.1.img) Is it normal that the Broadcom module (/lib/modules/2.6.24-19-lpia/volatile/wl.ko) doesn't belong to any package (as per dpkg -S)? Are there any updated packages for lpia that I have overlooked? What would be needed to compile a newer version of the module myself? (I'm relatively new to Ubuntu, but occasionally applied patches & compiled the kernel on my Gentoo boxes.) I'm sorry if some of this shouldn't belong here, I'm slightly confused by the hundreds of intertwined projects and the various package and distribution versions. Anyway, thanks a lot for taking care of this issue! -- Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219382] Re: fsck not run on boot if on battery power
@Scott: So where should this be discussed? In my humble opinion this is a serious matter which is being downplayed by having it marked as WONTFIX. Now, I understand that technically speaking it's the design that's broken rather than the implementation, but the end result is the same: the current behaviour is endangering users' data. (Especially when they're experiencing random hard lockups due to the crappy Broadcom wl driver.) I'm quite astonished that I have to manually edit the init.d scripts just to make sure I'm not putting my data at risk when booting after something unexpected happens. -- fsck not run on boot if on battery power https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292450] Re: Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics
I can confirm this bug on a Lenovo Ideapad S10e (which has a BCM4312 802.11b/g [14e4:4315] built in). When the wl module is loaded the system randomly locks up: no mouse input, no keyboard input, even sysrq is ignored, it's completely dead. I'm using a fresh install of the netbook remix (the 1.0.1-img file based on hardy). The system is up-to-date. As far as I am concerned, this bug is definitely *NOT* fixed in hardy (except if the netbook- remix.archive.canonical repositories were all outdated compared to the normal hardy repos). -- Broadcom STA/wl driver causes random kernel panics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
@Blue Parking does not stress the disc's surface but rather the head movement mechanics. Remember, parking must be fast enough to protect against imminent damage. (Consider for example HP's HDAPS technology.) Thus excessive load/unload cycles *are* stressful and *will* damage the drive. Why else would the manufacturers specify minimum values in their data sheets? Regards, Gilles -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
@Blue Aren't there two slightly different but related problems? The first one is about a nearly inaudible clicking which happens when the heads are unloaded and which is the reason I filed this report (since it'd be killing my drive, slowly but inevitably). It doesn't cause any noticeable delays when the heads are loaded again. The second one is true spindown which causes annoying delays when the drive is spun up again. (And which also causes wear and tear on the mechanical parts of the drive.) Wouldn't that be bug 17216? Regards, Gilles -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
@ Blue: As far as I know the Load_Cycle_Count (i.e. this bug) is all about head parking and not about spinning the drive down. And head parking definitely /is/ a problem since the manufacturers usually give a maximum of 300,000 or 600,000 cycles (depending on the drive or its year of construction) in their specifications. Gilles -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
It seems that I completely forgot to publish my fix/workaroud. As far as
I remember I did two things:
1) I added the following lines to my hdparm.conf:
/dev/sda {
apm = 255
}
2) I created a file /etc/acpi/resume.d/99-stop-hitachi-madness.sh
with the following contents:
#!/bin/sh
hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda
I hope this helps.
--
default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113045] Re: no sound with intel hda
Oops, I just found a report specifically about the Lenovo issue (bug 84616). Sorry for the noise. -- no sound with intel hda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113045] Re: no sound with intel hda
As far as I can tell, all Lenovo 3000 C200 laptops are also affected by this bug. As reported on http://lenovo.dropshock.com/archives/fixing-sound/ upgrading to a newer alsa version fixes this issue. If I'm not mistaken this is the relevant alsa bug: https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2725 (at least http://www.linlap.com/wiki/Lenovo+3000+C200 is pointing there) Hopefully this fix finds its way in one of the next updates. -- no sound with intel hda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127335] Re: backlight on Lenovo 3000 C200 can't be set to maximum again
I can confirm this issue on another C200. Only a reboot allows to access the brightest levels again. (At the grub prompt increasing the brightness is still working.) -- backlight on Lenovo 3000 C200 can't be set to maximum again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
Oh well... Forget about my last comment. I was looking at "192 Power- Off_Retract_Count" instead of "193 Load_Cycle_Count" and freaked out. I guess I need some sleep. Anyway, what is Power-Off_Retract_Count and how can it reach 7,000,000? -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
Please increase the importance of this issue. I'm really concerned about my disk's health. I was noticing some clicking but didn't think much about it since I "fixed" this issue a long time ago. Only now it occurred to me that maybe some update overwrote my changes. Unfortunately this seems to be the case. Here's the current stats from my disk (the thinkpad is from august 2006!): 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 7143426 Over 7 MILLION retracts! I'm wondering how long it will hold. I just find it curious that "value" is still at "100" whereas the threshold (for failure) is "000". -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
I can confirm that the workaround fixes the issue on my Z60m (Dapper). Thanks! -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 72363] Re: Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work
> Thanks for your bug report. Could you please provide the information > listed in this wiki page: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam/HotkeyResearch ? Thanks in > advance. IIRC I *did* follow the page you're mentioning. If something's missing, please tell me. Thanks for taking care of this issue! -- Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/72363 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
Same issue with the Edgy Live CD (on my Z60m). -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46700] Re: xorg.conf - synaptics touchpad misdetected?
I've got a similar issue with Edgy on a Lenovo 3000 C100. On a fresh installation of edgy, the touchpad was misconfigured. In fact there was only a mouse input section: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Configured Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" Option "Device""/dev/input/mice" Option "Protocol" "ExplorerPS/2" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true" EndSection and some wacom devices which I don't have. I had to manually add a synaptics section (generated by dpkg-reconfigure) Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Synaptics Touchpad" Driver "synaptics" Option "SendCoreEvents""true" Option "Device""/dev/psaux" Option "Protocol" "auto-dev" Option "HorizScrollDelta" "0" EndSection and modify the ServerLayout accordingly. Now touchpad scrolling works. Maybe this is due to the fact that a USB mouse was plugged in during the installation? Anyway the installer completely missed the touchpad. -- xorg.conf - synaptics touchpad misdetected? https://launchpad.net/bugs/46700 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72363] Re: Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work
Just in case it matters, here's the relevant dmidecode output: LENOVO 0761FNG 3000 C100 -- Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/72363 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72363] Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work
Public bug reported: I didn't know against which package to file this report. Sorry. While the C100 suspends and hibernates just fine from KPowerSave (in Edgy Eft), the associated hotkeys don't work. Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam/HotkeyResearch, here's what I found out: 1) Fn+F4 (suspend) and Fn+F12 (hibernate) don't emit a keycode according to showkey. 2) They don't generate ACPI events (no change in /var/log/acpid) 3) In syslog they appear as follows: Fn+F4 Nov 18 21:10:08 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183525.088000] atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x97 on isa0060/serio0). Nov 18 21:10:08 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183525.088000] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e017 ' to make it known. Nov 18 21:10:08 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183525.12] atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x97 on isa0060/serio0). Nov 18 21:10:08 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183525.12] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e017 ' to make it known. Fn+F12 Nov 18 21:10:55 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183572.404000] atkbd.c: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0x98 on isa0060/serio0). Nov 18 21:10:55 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183572.404000] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e018 ' to make it known. Nov 18 21:10:55 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183572.44] atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0x98 on isa0060/serio0). Nov 18 21:10:55 HumptyDumpty kernel: [17183572.44] atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e018 ' to make it known. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Lenovo 3000 C100 suspend and hibernate hotkeys don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/72363 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72360] Please whitelist Lenovo 3000 C100 for suspend
Public bug reported: I'm using edgy on a Lenovo 3000 C100 with Intel Graphics. Resuming from Suspend-to-RAM results in a black screen. Switching to a VC and back to X doesn't help. Suspending while in text mode doesn't help either. I found out that setting POST_VIDEO=false in /etc/default/acpi-support fixes this issue. Now it suspends and resumes perfectly! (BTW, hibernate worked right out of the box) Please whitelist this notebook in /usr/share/acpi-support. Here's the relevant dmidecode output: LENOVO 0761FNG 3000 C100 Thanks ** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Please whitelist Lenovo 3000 C100 for suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/72360 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54154] Re: kpdf ignores duplex printing settings and forces duplex
According to KDE's bugzilla this is due to the poppler patch used by (K)Ubuntu. See http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131296. Possibly bug 47263 is related. (But I'm not sure) -- kpdf ignores duplex printing settings and forces duplex https://launchpad.net/bugs/54154 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47263] Re: lpr -o sides=one-sided HAS NO EFFECT
I'm having a similar problem with kpdf (in Gentoo, but they're also using a poppler-patched kpdf). Possibly this issue is the result of an xpdf/poppler bug. See http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131296 for more details. According to http://www.cups.org/doc-1.1/overview.html cups is also using xpdf code to interpret the pdf file. This could explain the similar behaviour in both cases. -- lpr -o sides=one-sided HAS NO EFFECT https://launchpad.net/bugs/47263 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: [Bug 59695] default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
> When switching to battery power, /etc/acpi/power.sh issues the command > hdparm -B 1 to all block devices. But only if laptop mode is enabled. However in my case laptop mode is still _disabled_ in /etc/default/acpi-support. So, if I'm understanding the power.sh script correctly it's _not_ this script which causes these frequent load cycles. Hence my original report was wrong. Sorry about that. Some more investigation led me to the following page: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problem_with_hard_drive_clicking It seems that Hitachi is using some quite aggressive power management. I'm not sure what to do about this report. If it really turns out to be a hardware problem it should probably be closed. -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://launchpad.net/bugs/59695 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: [Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
> I can confirm this behavior with my T43 Thanks for confirming. So now we'll have to determine sane default values. I did some very unscientific tests using the command smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sda | grep 193; hdparm -B 180 /dev/sda; sleep 600; \ smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sda | grep 193; hdparm -B 255 /dev/sda and continuing to work normally. After 10 minutes I checked the output. Here are some values: -B 128 -> 23 cycles in 10 minutes -B 160 -> 29 in 10' -B 180 -> 0 in 10' -B 196 -> 0 in 10' -B 200 -> 0 in 10' So even -B 160 leads to 3 cycles per minute (180 per hour), leading to a lifespan of 600,000/180/24=139 days (of continuous battery powered use). Note that only a few years ago 300,000 load/unload cycles was a common value. What is remarkable is the sharp drop between 180 and 196. Could somebody else report some values for his system? Does anyone know how the -B parameter is interpreted or is that left up to the device? -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://launchpad.net/bugs/59695 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
Public bug reported: When switching to battery power, /etc/acpi/power.sh issues the command hdparm -B 1 to all block devices. This leads to extremely frequent load cycles. For example, my new thinkpad has already done well over 7000 load cycles -- in only 100 hours. That's at least one unloading per minute. Googling for "load unload cycles notebook OR laptop" shows that most laptop drives handle up to 600,000 such cycles. As these values clearly show, this issue is of high importance and should be fixed sooner rather than later. Please see for yourself how often your drive is load cycling: smartctl -d ata -a /dev/sda (This command is for an SATA drive; you'll need to install the smartmontools package first.) See also http://paul.luon.net/journal/hacking/BrokenHDDs.html for a rather dramatic account of the effects the current default values may have. Just in case the load/unload timeout depends on the specific laptop or disk model, here are my system specifications: ThinkPad Z60m & Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00 disk (80GB) ** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://launchpad.net/bugs/59695 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43052] Re: OpenGL viewport cut-off with 915gm graphics
Maybe waiting for the next CVS snapshot will solve my problem. Here's what I found out about this issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8010 According to that page it should be fixed in mesa as of 20060826. -- OpenGL viewport cut-off with 915gm graphics https://launchpad.net/bugs/43052 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43052] Re: OpenGL viewport cut-off with 915gm graphics
I'm also having OpenGL problems with my 915GM graphics (Thinkpad Z60m). The symptoms are as reported: viewport cut-off in various apps, in google earth: wrong viewport and messed up graphics. So I decided to give the compiz repository a try. First I only updated the i810 driver, logged out, restarted X, logged in again. Unfortunately acceleration was now broken (as reported by googleearth). I thought that maybe this driver depended on newer mesa-libs, so I did a full update in adept. Now OpenGL is completely broken. glxgears fails with: $ glxgears glxgears: intel_ioctl.c:62: intelEmitIrqLocked: Assertion `((*(int *)intel->driHwLock) & ~0x4000U) == (0x8000U|intel->hHWContext)' failed. Aborted Google Earth gives the following error message: do_wait: drmWaitVBlank returned -1, IRQs don't seem to be working correctly. Try running with LIBGL_THROTTLE_REFRESH and LIBL_SYNC_REFRESH unset. (and it's *extremely* slow, much slower than with software rendering) Rebooting doesn't help. Here's the complete list of updated packages: xserver-xorg-driver-i810 1:1.5.0.1-0ubuntu2 libdrm2 2.0.2+cvs20060824 libgl1-mesa 6.5.1+cvs20060824 libgl1-mesa-dri 6.5.1+cvs20060824 libglu1-mesa 6.5.1+cvs20060824 libpoppler1 0.5.3-0ubuntu1 libpoppler1-qt 0.5.3-0ubuntu1 libtunepimp2c2a 0.3.0-9.1ubuntu3.1quinn1 libxfixes3 1:4.0-0ubuntu1 libxcomposite1 1:0.3-0ubuntu1 libxss1 1:1.1-0ubuntu1 mesa-utils 6.5.1+cvs20060824 poppler-utils 0.5.3-0ubuntu1 -- OpenGL viewport cut-off with 915gm graphics https://launchpad.net/bugs/43052 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
The following is added to the Xorg.0.log when I do the following: 1. close the lid 2. open the lid 3. switch to VT1 4. switch back to X (WW) I810(0): Fixing display offsets. (WW) I810(0): Fixing display offsets. (WW) I810(0): Fixing display offsets. Synaptics DeviceOff called (WW) I810(0): Successfully set original devices (WW) I810(0): Setting the original video mode instead of restoring the saved state (WW) I810(0): Extended BIOS function 0x5f05 failed. (II) I810(0): BIOS call 0x5f05 not supported, setting refresh with VBE 3 method. (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 7 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 0 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 1 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 3 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 2 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 4 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 5 (II) I810(0): xf86UnbindGARTMemory: unbind key 6 (WW) I810(0): Successfully set original devices (2) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 7 at 0x007bf000 (pgoffset 1983) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 0 at 0x0000 (pgoffset 65535) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 1 at 0x0fffb000 (pgoffset 65531) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 3 at 0x0ffea000 (pgoffset 65514) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 2 at 0x0fffa000 (pgoffset 65530) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 4 at 0x0f00 (pgoffset 61440) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 5 at 0x0e80 (pgoffset 59392) (II) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: bind key 6 at 0x0e7f8000 (pgoffset 59384) (II) Loading sub module "ddc" (II) LoadModule: "ddc" (II) Reloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libddc.so (II) I810(0): VESA VBE DDC read successfully (II) I810(0): Manufacturer: IBM Model: 2373 Serial#: 0 (II) I810(0): Year: 2005 Week: 0 (II) I810(0): EDID Version: 1.3 (II) I810(0): Digital Display Input (II) I810(0): Max H-Image Size [cm]: horiz.: 33 vert.: 21 (II) I810(0): Gamma: 2.20 (II) I810(0): No DPMS capabilities specified; RGB/Color Display (II) I810(0): First detailed timing is preferred mode (II) I810(0): redX: 0.590 redY: 0.344 greenX: 0.323 greenY: 0.534 (II) I810(0): blueX: 0.156 blueY: 0.138 whiteX: 0.312 whiteY: 0.328 (II) I810(0): Manufacturer's mask: 0 (II) I810(0): Supported additional Video Mode: (II) I810(0): clock: 71.1 MHz Image Size: 331 x 207 mm (II) I810(0): h_active: 1280 h_sync: 1328 h_sync_end 1360 h_blank_end 1440 h_border: 0 (II) I810(0): v_active: 800 v_sync: 803 v_sync_end 809 v_blanking: 823 v_border: 0 (II) I810(0): Supported additional Video Mode: (II) I810(0): clock: 59.3 MHz Image Size: 331 x 207 mm (II) I810(0): h_active: 1280 h_sync: 1328 h_sync_end 1360 h_blank_end 1440 h_border: 0 (II) I810(0): v_active: 800 v_sync: 803 v_sync_end 809 v_blanking: 823 v_border: 0 (II) I810(0): 154WX2-TL01 (II) I810(0): Display plane A is disabled and connected to Pipe A. (II) I810(0): Display plane B is enabled and connected to Pipe B. (II) I810(0): Enabling plane B. (II) I810(0): Display plane A is now disabled and connected to Pipe A. (II) I810(0): Display plane B is now enabled and connected to Pipe B. (II) I810(0): PIPEACONF is 0x (II) I810(0): PIPEBCONF is 0x8000 (II) I810(0): Mode bandwidth is 61 Mpixel/s (II) I810(0): maxBandwidth is 1152 Mbyte/s, pipe bandwidths are 324 Mbyte/s, 0 Mbyte/s (II) I810(0): [drm] dma control initialized, using IRQ 201 Synaptics DeviceOn called (--) Synaptics Touchpad touchpad found (II) Configured Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57315] Re: [Bug 57315] Re: loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:25, Simon Law wrote: > Yes, that's a good patch to merge. So, will this be in one of the next dapper kernel updates? That would be great! BTW there are other models which need to be whitelisted. See bug 44976. -- loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57315 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57315] Re: [Bug 57315] Re: loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m
> That patch, at
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-April/015983.html,
> seems a bit sketchy. Shouldn't it say?
>
> HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_LENOVO("ThinkPad Z60m")
I think it should be OK, the DMI of the Z60m is still referring to IBM:
SMBIOS 2.33 present.
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 25 bytes.
System Information
Manufacturer: IBM
Product Name: 2529ETG
Version: ThinkPad Z60m
Serial Number: ***
UUID: ----
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
Here's a more trustworthy source:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4f507ea1560805b16cf4a4359e304ae0db0c2dcb
--
loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57315
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: [Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
> This sounds similar as bug 40808 (HP nw8240 with ATI FireGL V5000). Contrary to bug 40808 the resolution seems to be correct, at least the cursor isn't stretched. I'd also like to add that sometimes the display shows the correct screen contents for a fraction of a second. After this short flash it becomes black again and finally it shows the messed up screen contents. So it seems that some initialization is actually breaking things. -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43620] Re: hdaps with a z60m and sata disk not working
So, in fact, the problem has more to do with patching the kernel than with SATA? In this case, I'd say this is more or less a duplicate of bug #53927. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/+bug/53927 -- hdaps with a z60m and sata disk not working https://launchpad.net/bugs/43620 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57315] Re: loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m
Oops, I forgot to check the syslog: hdaps: supported laptop not found! So, please add the Z60m to the in-kernel whitelist. See also http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.3/0573.html and http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-April/015983.html -- loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57315 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57315] loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m
Public bug reported: here's the error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# modprobe hdaps FATAL: Error inserting hdaps (/lib/modules/2.6.15-26-686/kernel/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.ko): No such device or address ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- loading hdaps fails on a Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57315 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
I played around a bit with "xset dpms force off" and "... on" but couldn't reproduce the garbled screen. After manually turning off the screen, using the touchpad or pressing a key turns the screen on again without any display corruption. So either those two commands don't correspond exactly to those used by acpi-support or the action of closing the lid does more than just notifying ACPI. -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57144] Re: add Thinkpad (Intel Graphics) to ACPI_SLEEP whitelist
No, actually such a double switch would be needed for lid close/open but it's *not necessary* for suspend/resume to work properly. In fact I'm very happy that all the major ACPI stuff works right out of the box. Thanks a lot! -- add Thinkpad (Intel Graphics) to ACPI_SLEEP whitelist https://launchpad.net/bugs/57144 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Re: Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
No, it doesn't solve the problem. This isn't surprising since the DOUBLE_CONSOLE_SWITCH is only done when resuming from suspend. (At least that's what grep told me...) However suspend/resume works fine with and without this option. It's only the lid that's problematic. -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57147] Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m
Public bug reported: On my Z60m with Intel Graphics closing the lid blanks the screen, but after reopening the lid the display is completely messed up (with the exception of the mouse cursor). Switching to a VC and back to X fixes this issue. Maybe lid.sh could do this automatically. Note that there are no problems when resuming from sleep or hibernate. ** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Screen is garbled after lid close & open on Thinkpad Z60m https://launchpad.net/bugs/57147 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57144] add Thinkpad (Intel Graphics) to ACPI_SLEEP whitelist
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: acpi-support On my Thinkpad Z60m with Intel Graphics suspend works fine. Please whitelist it in /usr/share/acpi-support/IBM.config. Here's my dmidecode data: # dmidecode 2.7 SMBIOS 2.33 present. Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 25 bytes. System Information Manufacturer: IBM Product Name: 2529ETG Version: ThinkPad Z60m Serial Number: *** UUID: ---- Wake-up Type: Power Switch If you need anything else please tell me. ** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- add Thinkpad (Intel Graphics) to ACPI_SLEEP whitelist https://launchpad.net/bugs/57144 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
