[Bug 672388] Re: avahi service discovery failure when bind installed causes apt proxy setting from apt.conf to be ignored

2010-11-13 Thread Grant Walters
Yes, sort of :-)  I'm still working out where everything is on Ubuntu nowadays, 
so it can be a pain when something just stops working.  In this case, I think 
the fault lies with the squid-deb-proxy failure rather than with apt or bind.
I would assume that the initial Proxy server entry would have been collected 
without trouble initially by apt and then the reference has been reset by 
squid-deb-proxy but I'm not sure.
The old rule of leaving the environment the way it was if you aren't successful 
should be applied here.
If a proxy exists when the /usr/share/squid-deb-proxy-client/apt-avahi-discover 
code runs, then it should still exist if the apt-avahi-discover code fails.  
The same should apply to any other code running.
Sorry I can't be of more help at the moment.  Service discovery/zeroconf is on 
my list for the next few weeks.

-- 
avahi service discovery failure when bind installed causes apt proxy setting 
from apt.conf to be ignored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672388
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 672388] [NEW] avahi service discovery failure when bind installed causes apt proxy setting from apt.conf to be ignored

2010-11-07 Thread Grant Walters
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apt

I am using apt-cacher so I have put Acquire::http { Proxy 
"http://localhost:3142";; }; into my apt.conf file.
Yesterday I downloaded bind9 which has installed itself and started.  I haven't 
had time yet to configure for my local domain but I noticed that when I did an 
apt-get update, it wasn't going through apt-cacher.
I also downloaded squid-deb-proxy to have a look at (which I haven't 
configured).
apt-get update spat out a "service_browser failed: DNS failure: NXDOMAIN" error.
I shut down bind, commented out #Acquire::http::ProxyAutoDetect 
"/usr/share/squid-deb-proxy-client/apt-avahi-discover"; from the 30autoproxy 
file and things went back to normal.

While I appreciate that I have some configuration work to do.  Whatever
is the causes of the failure message, whether it be bind not configued
or squid-deb-proxy not configured, the original Proxy line in the
apt.conf file should be observed?

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apt-cacher-ng bind9 squid-web-proxy

-- 
avahi service discovery failure when bind installed causes apt proxy setting 
from apt.conf to be ignored
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672388
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655459] Re: do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Walters
sorry it took so long to get back to you.  the solution you provided was
perfect.  the upgrade over dialup was very painfull ~5 days :-) but
worked.  pity i then killed the machine jumping to lucid.  case closed
and thanks for your assistance.

-- 
do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655459] Re: do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Walters
sorry it took so long to get back to you.  the solution you provided was
perfect.  the upgrade over dialup was very painfull ~5 days :-) but
worked.  pity i then killed the machine jumping to lucid.  case closed
and thanks for your assistance.

-- 
do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655459] Re: do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy

2010-10-05 Thread Grant Walters

** Attachment added: "Upgrade Log files"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655459/+attachment/1674361/+files/dist-upgrade.tar.gz

-- 
do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655459] [NEW] do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy

2010-10-05 Thread Grant Walters
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

Calculating the changes

Could not calculate the upgrade

A unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.

This can be caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu
* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu

If none of this applies, then please report this bug against the
'update-manager' package and include the files in
/var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bugreport.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
do-release-upgrade fails Gutsy to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 165302] cvs date header tag wrong

2007-11-26 Thread Grant Walters
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: cvs

After an an ubuntu upgrade I now have cvs-1.12 when I was using the older 
cvs-1.11.
The problem is that somewhere along the line somebody has decided to replace 
the the header expansion logic for dates from /mm/dd to -mm-dd format.
While -mm-dd may be ISO standards based, the change in format has 
completely invalidated every cvs repository created and maintained with the 
1.11 version that have checked out files as cvs diff, checkout, commit et al 
all return the file with the new format and then report the files as different 
purely based upon the expansion lines.
>From what I can find on the NET the / format is in the offical format.
Perhaps the maintainer can provide a command line option to support the older 
version?

** Affects: cvs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
cvs date header tag wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165302
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22220] Re: Correct modules for I2O-based raid are not loaded

2006-10-14 Thread Grant Walters
Hi, I can confirm the same kernel panic on an Adaptec 2000S I2O
controller with the standard Breezy 5.10 install CD.

-- 
Correct modules for I2O-based raid are not loaded
https://launchpad.net/bugs/0

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs