[Bug 345208] Re: [SRU]PythonMagick is not usable because of undefined symbols
I confirm the problem disappeared after upgrading to Version: 0.9.1-1 from Karmic. -- [SRU]PythonMagick is not usable because of undefined symbols https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203235] Re: ripperx broken layout
Seems to work after upgrading to Intrepid (version of ripperX is 2.7.2-2 there). ** Changed in: ripperx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- ripperx broken layout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203235] [NEW] ripperx broken layout
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ripperx ripperx has a broken layout, looks like a problem with fonts - they are to broad and the kerning value is too high, so some of the information is not readable. $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.10" $ apt-cache policy ripperx ripperx: Zainstalowana: 2.7.0-4ubuntu1 [...] ** Affects: ripperx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ripperx broken layout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203235] Re: ripperx broken layout
** Attachment added: "screenshot showing the problem" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12708685/screen1205775800.png -- ripperx broken layout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62833] Re: Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog
I had switched to some other software and had been using it instead, so I have not been following the mysql-admin development, but it seems to got changed a lot since my last run. I couldn't reproduce the problem any more (current gutsy), but as I say - I am not using mysql-admin on a daily basis. I guess this ticket can be safely marked as obsolete. -- Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/62833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139732] Re: asterisk 1.4.11~dfsg-1 segfaults on startup
It behaves the same (segfault) with asterisk and asterisk-h323 taken from Hardy, i.e. 1.4.17~dfsg-2. -- asterisk 1.4.11~dfsg-1 segfaults on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124628] Re: kommando does not provide dcop interface
It has been moved into 'kded', please look at: $ dcop kded | grep kommando and $ dcop kded kommandod ** Changed in: kommando (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- kommando does not provide dcop interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129172] Re: kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64
Flashing the BIOS has helped (luckily Gigabyte provide a DOS flashing utility) and now booting with 8GB system memory installed, and no "mem=" parameters, makes the system behave correctly. So I would consider that bug not a kernel bug, but a hardware issue indeed. -- kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129172] Re: kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64
I tried with the mem value (mem=8318M) and it was slow, so tried with (mem=7168M) and it booted quickly. But that hasn't solved the problem. Once I've started JBOSS on that server, the JBOSS was starting very slowly. So my gut feeling is that without the mem parameter the kernel puts itself into 'slow memory areas', and with the mem parameter we can make kernel put itself into 'fast memory', but other applications can be assigned 'slow memory'. Will have to try with flashing the BIOS. For others. If you don't have the floppy drive and still want to flash the BIOS, maybe you could find this useful: http://www.linuxinsight.com/how-to-flash-motherboard-bios-from-linux-no-dos-windows-no-floppy-drive.html I'ven't tried it yet, but it seems to be a good idea. -- kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129172] Re: kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64
The same happens on slightly different motherboard (Gigabyte GA-G33-DS3R), with the same processor (Q6600) and 8GB RAM. When running on 4GB it works fine. With 8GB it's terribly slow. Similar behaviour can be observed when trying to run the Knoppix Live CD (32-bit, 4.0). With 8GB it doesn't boot correctly, stopping with "Can't find KNOPPIX filesystem, sorry. Dropping you into a very limited shell. Press reset button to quit". Will try with the mem parameter. -- kernel performance is *very* slow with 8GB RAM on AMD64. 6GB is fine. kernel 2.6.22-8 x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105881] Re: acer_acpi [Needs packaging]
The repository (mumblyworld) is not working. Are you planning to still share it? -- acer_acpi [Needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124628] Re: kommando does not provide dcop interface
[when being logged on to the KDE environment] $ dcop | grep kommando | wc -l 0 Kommando entry in the Control Panel is accessible, Ctrl+Alt+H works (the menu appears). -- kommando does not provide dcop interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124628] kommando does not provide dcop interface
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kommando Kommando does not provide DCOP interface in Ubuntu Feisty, but the author claims it does (http://www.kde- apps.org/content/show.php?content=29514). $ uname -a Linux aspirant 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 19:00:28 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux # apt-cache show kommando | grep Version Version: 0.5.1-1ubuntu1 apt-cache show kdebase | grep Version Version: 4:3.5.6-0ubuntu20.1 Version: 4:3.5.6-0ubuntu20 ** Affects: kommando (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kommando does not provide dcop interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124628 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62833] Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mysql-admin Steps to reproduce: 1. Run mysql-admin (as a normal user) 2. Connect to some database 3. Choose "Startup parameters" (the third tab). 4. A dialog called "Select File Section" appears and the user is asked to choose between "mysqld_safe", "mysqld" and "mysqldump". 5. Click "Cancel". 6. The program crashes. 7. In the console (prob. stderr) you can see: "*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00cbf855 ***" (the pointer value changes of course). ** Affects: mysql-admin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/62833 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62833] Re: Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog
Forgot to give some numbers: mysql-admin 1.1.6-1build1 System: Ubuntu Dapper, up-to-date kernel: 2.6.15-26-amd64-k8 -- Mysql-admin crash after cancelling some dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/62833 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57966] Different kde apps crash
Public bug reported: It has happened to me many times, with different "k-apps" - including kmail, kicker, konqueror, kpdf. The trace contains always the same. I am running Dapper Drake 6.06, on 2.6.15-26-amd64-k8, but it's not specific to just that kernel release. The trace | uniq: (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912570367088 (LWP 8028)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x2b23c752 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x2b23c752 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x2b23c5f0 in sleep () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x2be84cc5 in KCrash::startDrKonqi () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #3 0x2beaaa7c in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #4 0x2b1db1b0 in killpg () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0x in ?? () ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Different kde apps crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/57966 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50500] Re: Screen freezes black and locks up randomly
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 50501 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 50501 Screen freezes black and locks up randomly -- Screen freezes black and locks up randomly https://launchpad.net/bugs/50500 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50501] Re: Screen freezes black and locks up randomly
** Bug 50500 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- Screen freezes black and locks up randomly https://launchpad.net/bugs/50501 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50338] Re: Artifacts in buttons in human theme and some other theme with ati radeon 9200
A duplicate of bug #50316 ? -- Artifacts in buttons in human theme and some other theme with ati radeon 9200 https://launchpad.net/bugs/50338 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50316] Re: Garbage on buttons using Ubuntu Theme
A duplicate of bug #50338 ? -- Garbage on buttons using Ubuntu Theme https://launchpad.net/bugs/50316 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50271] Re: ubiquity should be more verbose
OK. Sorry for the sentence about "not telling the truth" (it's a bit different from lying). But comparising to other operating systems (even that from Redmond) was intended to point out the weak points of software. We should take advantages of good ideas and not repeat any mistakes. Any way - thanks for your involvement. :) -- ubiquity should be more verbose https://launchpad.net/bugs/50271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50271] ubiquity should be more verbose
Public bug reported: What is: - ubiquity does some mighty things not telling the truth about what it's doing, it shows some "configuring hardware", "checking swap partition", etc., messages. These are like Enigma - what does it mean? What operations are done? Should be: - ubiquity should allow to track what it's doing (by a special "Advanced" button revealing the commands run), At the moment it's just like a M$-Windows installer - one can never tell what it's doing. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- ubiquity should be more verbose https://launchpad.net/bugs/50271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42264] Re: locale dependant segfault for dd
Still the same for pl_PL.UTF-8. All packages up-to-date with Ubuntu Dapper. ** Also affects: language-pack-pl-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- locale dependant segfault for dd https://launchpad.net/bugs/42264 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
