[Bug 1246917] Re: ltrace version is ancient, does not support PIE binaries
This bug is back in 17.04. gcc 6 produces PIE executables by default, confusing ltrace (no tracing shown), same as above. $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 6.3.0-12ubuntu2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-6/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-6 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-libmpx --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --with-target-system-zlib --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 6.3.0 20170406 (Ubuntu 6.3.0-12ubuntu2) ** Tags added: zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246917 Title: ltrace version is ancient, does not support PIE binaries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltrace/+bug/1246917/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1600252] [NEW] calendarserver package broken
Public bug reported: Hi there are a number of things wrong with the current calendarserver package (7.0+dfsg-2) on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS server. 1. calendarserver can only work with a database backend, support for the files backend has been dropped upstream according to the docs. Yet, there is no dependency on any database, in particular postgresql. 2. The twisted framework seems to be missing gcc: "unable to execute 'x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc': No such file or directory" when starting caldavd. Not sure if fatal, may need python-dev to be installed as well. 3. There appears to be no method or script to create the required DB user and define the schema for the database. In past versions (<6.0) there was a calendarserver_bootstrap_database script. When you start caldavd now you will get an error in /var/log/caldavd/error.log: " pg8000.core.ProgrammingError: (u'FATAL', u'3D000', u'database "caldav" does not exist', u'postinit.c', u'826', u'InitPostgres', u'', u'')" I managed to modify Apple's original bootstrap_database script (attached) and use it to create a working calendar server. This is the original script: https://svn.calendarserver.org/repository/calendarserver/CalendarServer/tags/release/CalendarServer-5.3/calendarserver/tools/bootstrapdatabase.py Apart from the iOS paths there are a couple of things that need addressing for a port to Linux: a. The database user should be "caldavd" not "caldav", to match the one in /etc/caldavd/caldavd.plist b. The script assumes communication via UNIX sockets. With the default Postgresql config this means that the script must be run by the right user for authentication to succeed. Problem is that the script requires 2 different users. i. postgres to create the caldavd user and database ii. caldavd to set the database schema in the newly created database So the createuser and createdb need to be run as postgres, and the PSQL commands as caldavd :-( In my case I solved it by turning off exit-on-error and running the script as these two users. Happy fixing. ** Affects: calendarserver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: calendarserver ** Attachment added: "Dirty fix for bootstrapping DB" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600252/+attachment/4697439/+files/bootstrapdatabase.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600252 Title: calendarserver package broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarserver/+bug/1600252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
On 02/10/2013 08:09, Seth Arnold wrote: Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I also see extensive use of fork(2) in the upstream git: http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus- sasl/tree/saslauthd/saslauthd- main.c?id=dedad73e5e7a75d01a5f3d5a6702ab8ccd2ff40d From just the five minutes I've looked, I'd say it looks like usual Unix-style preforking server, not threaded server. Hi I'm not an expert on this. But when compiled with --with-ipctype=doors it will use pthreads. Also, the auth_shadow.c contains #ifdef _REENTRANT directives, suggesting possible multi-threaded use. So someone (perhaps upstream) should make sure the code is safe to use in all configurations. CU, Arno -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
On 02/10/2013 08:09, Seth Arnold wrote: Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I also see extensive use of fork(2) in the upstream git: http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus- sasl/tree/saslauthd/saslauthd- main.c?id=dedad73e5e7a75d01a5f3d5a6702ab8ccd2ff40d From just the five minutes I've looked, I'd say it looks like usual Unix-style preforking server, not threaded server. Hi I'm not an expert on this. But when compiled with --with-ipctype=doors it will use pthreads. Also, the auth_shadow.c contains #ifdef _REENTRANT directives, suggesting possible multi-threaded use. So someone (perhaps upstream) should make sure the code is safe to use in all configurations. CU, Arno -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
Hi Thanks. Also note the use of crypt() in a multithreaded application. Must be crypt_r(). CU, Arno Seth Arnold 1187...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the service appears to be restarting without qualm, I can see why it didn't get a CVE, but this does seem less than awesome. Mancha made a lot of patches for services when the crypt() change happened, here's an email from him with upstream patch and two backported patches: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/3 -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
Hi Thanks. Also note the use of crypt() in a multithreaded application. Must be crypt_r(). CU, Arno Seth Arnold 1187...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the service appears to be restarting without qualm, I can see why it didn't get a CVE, but this does seem less than awesome. Mancha made a lot of patches for services when the crypt() change happened, here's an email from him with upstream patch and two backported patches: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/3 -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
BTW, shouldn't saslauthd use crypt_r(), it being a multi-threaded beasty? ;o) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
Hi all
I can reproduce the problem when I run saslauthd with authmech shadow:
saslauthd -a shadow
and then try to authenticate users that have a crippled /etc/shadow
entry. By crippled I mean ! or * as password entry, as for root, mail,
nobody.
When I run the 2.1.25 stock source with debugging symbols in gdb with
-a shadow -n 1 -d -m /var/run/saslauthd/mux as param, I get:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7e6e6f1 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0 0xb7e6e6f1 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0xb7e6e326 in strdup () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2 0x0804b910 in auth_shadow (login=0xb098 root,
password=0xb199 dfsdf, service=0xb29a ldap,
realm=0xb39b ) at auth_shadow.c:188
#3 0x0804ed3f in do_auth (_login=_login@entry=0xb098 root,
password=password@entry=0xb199 dfsdf,
service=service@entry=0xb29a ldap, realm=realm@entry=0xb39b )
at saslauthd-main.c:410
#4 0x0804dd17 in do_request (conn_fd=conn_fd@entry=9) at ipc_unix.c:426
#5 0x0804e547 in ipc_loop () at ipc_unix.c:277
#6 0x080499c1 in main (argc=8, argv=0xb5e4) at saslauthd-main.c:369
Offending line is:
cpw = strdup((const char *)crypt(password, sp-sp_pwdp));
where crypt() returns NULL for the crippled shadow entries. Proposed
patch:
char *encpwd = crypt(password, sp-sp_pwdp);
if (encpwd == NULL) {
if (flags VERBOSE) {
syslog(LOG_DEBUG, DEBUG: auth_shadow: crypt returned NULL);
}
RETURN(NO);
}
cpw = strdup((const char *)encpwd);
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001
Title:
saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in
libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
Hi all
I can reproduce the problem when I run saslauthd with authmech shadow:
saslauthd -a shadow
and then try to authenticate users that have a crippled /etc/shadow
entry. By crippled I mean ! or * as password entry, as for root, mail,
nobody.
When I run the 2.1.25 stock source with debugging symbols in gdb with
-a shadow -n 1 -d -m /var/run/saslauthd/mux as param, I get:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7e6e6f1 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0 0xb7e6e6f1 in ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0xb7e6e326 in strdup () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2 0x0804b910 in auth_shadow (login=0xb098 root,
password=0xb199 dfsdf, service=0xb29a ldap,
realm=0xb39b ) at auth_shadow.c:188
#3 0x0804ed3f in do_auth (_login=_login@entry=0xb098 root,
password=password@entry=0xb199 dfsdf,
service=service@entry=0xb29a ldap, realm=realm@entry=0xb39b )
at saslauthd-main.c:410
#4 0x0804dd17 in do_request (conn_fd=conn_fd@entry=9) at ipc_unix.c:426
#5 0x0804e547 in ipc_loop () at ipc_unix.c:277
#6 0x080499c1 in main (argc=8, argv=0xb5e4) at saslauthd-main.c:369
Offending line is:
cpw = strdup((const char *)crypt(password, sp-sp_pwdp));
where crypt() returns NULL for the crippled shadow entries. Proposed
patch:
char *encpwd = crypt(password, sp-sp_pwdp);
if (encpwd == NULL) {
if (flags VERBOSE) {
syslog(LOG_DEBUG, DEBUG: auth_shadow: crypt returned NULL);
}
RETURN(NO);
}
cpw = strdup((const char *)encpwd);
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001
Title:
saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in
libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]
BTW, shouldn't saslauthd use crypt_r(), it being a multi-threaded beasty? ;o) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b716+1ad000] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/1187001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827787] Re: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate
Well, the cifs fstab entries don't have auto like I thought they did, but they do auto mount. If I comment them all out completely the suspend and hibernate works fine. Here is one of the mount commands. I don't think it's doing anything unusual: //192.168.93.3/colin/documents /home/colin/Documents cifs credentials=/home/colin/.smbcredentials_colin,iocharset=utf8,codepage=unicode,unicode 0 0 Should I be mounting them differently? I also noticed that commenting them out fixed another problem on my wife's PC, which is that it takes FOREVER to shutdown. I had assumed it was something to do with the wifi card. I guess I'll look into that separately though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827787 Title: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/827787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827787] [NEW] gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate
Public bug reported: I don't know for sure that pm-utils is to blame, it might be gvfsd- trash, but this seemed like a good place to start. 1) Description:Ubuntu 11.04 Release:11.04 2) pm-utils: Installed: 1.4.1-7 Candidate: 1.4.1-7 Version table: *** 1.4.1-7 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status gvfs: Installed: 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) I expected the PC's to suspend or hibernate, as requested. 4) When I select either suspend or hibernate from the menu, Ubuntu starts going through the motions of the selected action, and it looks like it's working. However, it eventually just comes back to the locked screen login. I know it goes to this screen before suspending or hibernating, I'm not just being impatinent. I checked dmesg on my wife's PC (not the one I am reporting this on) after a failed suspend it said that gvfsd-trash was stopping the suspend. I did: sudo pkill gvfsd-trash ...and tried to suspend again and it worked perfectly, I then tried to hibernate right after it, and it also worked fine. I then thought maybe it was the same thing that was stopping suspend and hibernate from working on my own PC (the one I am reporting the bug from), so I killed gvfsd-trash it on, and then suspend worked here as well. I don't have a hibernate option on my menu. --- I hope this bug report work ok, the failed hibernate was right in the middle of me reporting this bug. Let me know if you need more information. Colin =) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: pm-utils 1.4.1-7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-generic-pae 2.6.38.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Aug 16 20:06:52 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100427.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pm-utils UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-06-12 (65 days ago) ** Affects: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827787 Title: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/827787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827787] Re: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827787 Title: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/827787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827787] Re: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate
There is a bug that is similar and confirmed ( Bug #610048 ), but I'm not sure it's the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827787 Title: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/827787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827787] Re: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate
I forgot to mention Both of the PC's have auto cifs mounts in their /etc/fstab files, which go to an Ubuntu Server file sharing machine. I don't know if this could be causing gvfsd-trash problems, but I though I better mention it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827787 Title: gvfsd-trash stops suspend and hibernate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/827787/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570049] Re: lsusb hangs forever
'lsusb' hangs on my Ubuntu Server 10.04 install when I have my Belkin usb wifi dongle plugged in. It uses a Broadcom chip. If I pull it out while lsusb is hung it gives a load of error lines about 'Vendor request 0x07 failedfor offse with error -71' (and few other errors), then outputs the lsusb results (minus the broadcom dongle of course). I hope that helps solve this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570049 Title: lsusb hangs forever -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570049] Re: lsusb hangs forever
I forgot to mention, that the same dongle works perfectly on my 10.04 desktop installed on my laptop, and 10.10 on my main PC. I just plug it in, it shows up in Network Manager, and will just connect to my network (even using WPA). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570049 Title: lsusb hangs forever -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459547] Re: Screen resolution not correct
Paul's solutions worked for me as well on my old Vaio. I'm using GRUB V1, so I had to make the change to the current (first in my case) entry in /boot/grub/menu.lst, and didn't need to run 'sudo update-grub'. I tried with 'quiet splash' in there as well, just kept the screen blank until near the end of the boot period when it went to the funky new Ubunst loading screen. Without it the booting information text is displayed. Thanks =) -- Screen resolution not correct https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465382] Re: Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics
This worked for me. I'm using GRUB V1, so I just had to make the change to the current (first in my case) entry in /boot/grub/menu.lst, and I didn't need to run 'sudo update-grub'. I tried with quiet splash in there, and that just kept the screen blank until near the end of the boot period (without it the boot information text is displayed). Many thanks, Colin -- Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269081] Re: nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks
I found the cause of the problem on my computer. I'm not sure if it's a bug, or by design. Packets that are INVALID (rather than NEW, ESTABLISHED or RELATED) don't get translated when they go through the NAT. I don't know what makes them invalid, they look the same as other that are ok from the same source, but it was the fact that I stopped limiting my network to ppp forwarding to NEW, ESTABLISHED or RELATED packets that caused my issue. Should they be left untranslated? Should they be considered INVALID in the first place? I don't know, but I'm glad I finally worked it out. -- nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269081] Re: nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks
I forgot to put the computer details in: SERVER: Linux redneck 2.6.28-16-server #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 20:37:10 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux DESKTOP: Linux duckpond 2.6.28-16-generic #55-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 20 19:48:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269081] Re: nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks
This looks like the same problem I'm having. Most NAT is happening, but every so often an internal IP is 'leaking' through. The leaked ones don't appear to be any different to similar non-leaked ones. The only pattern I have noticed so far is that they all seem to originate from Opera 10.01, but I don't know if that could actually make a difference. I do know that I started seeing this problem at about 3pm on October 29th, because I was half way through updating my laptop to the new release. I haven't updated either the server (which has the USB727 in it) or my desktop yet though. The leaked packet come from both my laptop and my desktop. I've included some system info below, but let me know if you need more [code] SERVER: Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 ppp: Installed: 2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status bind9: Installed: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages DESKTOP: opera: Installed: 10.01.4682.gcc4.qt3 Candidate: 10.01.4682.gcc4.qt3 Version table: *** 10.01.4682.gcc4.qt3 0 500 http://deb.opera.com stable/non-free Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [/code] -- nat routes internal ip's over extrenal networks lan ips over wan networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465382] Re: Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics
Yes it does. I didn't see that one when I filed my bug report. The other seems to be worded better. Is this likely to be fixed in this release or is it another case of waiting 6 months for the next version? -- Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465382] [NEW] Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg The bug reporter selected xorg, I don't know if that is where the problem is. Is it selecting the right thing for me, or just the first option? The info you requested after the text box, is at the end because I had already typed out the description before I got to that bit. My old Sony laptop has a max resolution of 800x600 since I upgraded to 9.10 on release day. It doesn't fill the screen though, it just uses the top left 800x600 section, and below is the top of the display again; with just black down the right hand side. I believe I have the unfortunate Intel graphics. Even further info: When I installed and initially rebooted it did this, but this morning when I came back to it, I just got a blank screen after I logged in (I tried the recovery mode, but that was no help). I tried going back to the previous kernel and that displayed correctly at 1024x768, but the touchpad no longer worked. I fiddled with a few setting, changed the resolution to 800x600 and back, etc. and tried again with the new kernel. It displayed again, but still with max of 800x600 in the top left corner. On the up side at least the font characters don't gradually disappear the more I use the computer like they used to. Requested info: ubuntu-bug -p xorg -- Apparently '-p' is deprecated. It appears to have brought me right back to the same place. So I'll carry on with what I have already started filling in. 1) Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 2) I don't know if the bug is in xorg or not, but incase it is I did this bit: xorg: Installed: 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 Candidate: 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 Version table: *** 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 0 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) I expected to be able to run at 1024x768 like I could before. Also, at 800x600 I would expect it to fill the screen. 4) It offers a max resolution of 800x600. This displays in an 800x600 section of a 1024x768 display, not across the whole screen. Idea: Why don't you put this guidelines above the area for writing this stuff in, rather than let me type out a whole load of stuff and then tell me what you want and how you want it? ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 CheckboxCommand: resolution_test CheckboxDescription: This display is using the following resolution: $output Is this acceptable for your display? CheckboxTest: resolution Date: Fri Oct 30 11:01:44 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 002: ID 045e:0039 Microsoft Corp. IntelliMouse Optical Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 054c:0069 Sony Corp. Memorystick MSC-U03 Reader Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Sony Corporation PCG-R600HMPD(GB) NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: 3.3V 32-bit PC Card ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=a429ae5a-8d47-4a6c-a7ed-069bc4161fd6 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu7 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1ubuntu4 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090929.7968e1fb-0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: xorg Tags: checkbox-bug Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 07/08/02 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: R0227C1 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 651M5B4475283200 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Sony Corporation dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvrR0227C1:bd07/08/02:svnSonyCorporation:pnPCG-R600HMPD(GB):pvr01:cvnSonyCorporation:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: PCG-R600HMPD(GB) dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation fglrx: Not loaded system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: i686kernel: 2.6.31-14-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug checkbox-bug i386 -- Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465382] Re: Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714806/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714808/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714809/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714811/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714812/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714813/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714814/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714816/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714818/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714819/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714820/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714821/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714822/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714823/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714824/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714826/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714827/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714828/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714831/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34714833/xkbcomp.txt -- Max resolution too low after upgrading to 9.10 on laptop with intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160814] Re: FATAL: Error inserting gspca. Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter
Try runing $ make menuconfig (leave menuconfig immediately, saving config) $ make dep in the kernel source dir and recompile the driver. This solved it for me (Centos 5.1) -- FATAL: Error inserting gspca. Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120520] Re: VLC downloads Flash Video rather that streaming
Note the Windows version of VLC does not have this problem as it uses a newer FFMPEG. Note2: The patch was created using normal diff following these instructions: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix But https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Bugs talks about using debdiff... ** Attachment added: Patch to ffmpeg-0.cvs20060823 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8092388/ffmpeg.patch -- VLC downloads Flash Video rather than streaming it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120520] Re: VLC downloads Flash Video rather than streaming it
** Summary changed: - VLC downloads Flash Video rather that streaming + VLC downloads Flash Video rather than streaming it -- VLC downloads Flash Video rather than streaming it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120520] VLC downloads Flash Video rather that streaming
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ffmpeg When trying to play a Flash Video (e.g. YouTube) in VLC using a URL, VLC will not stream the video but rather download it first and then start to play. Also reported here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2835741 I've tracked this bug down to FFMPEG. The version currently used by Feisty will try to find information about the streams in the flash video by reading frames. It succesfully discovers the audio and video stream, however, it does not stop reading frames after that and only starts playing the streams when it hits EOF. Hence VLC appears to first download the video rather than stream it. I'll attach a patch as soon as launchpad lets me ** Affects: ffmpeg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- VLC downloads Flash Video rather than streaming it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
