[Bug 316252] Re: Unable to retrieve MSN Address Book
This bug seems to be fixed on its own. The pidgin devs were right- seems like it really was an MSN server outage. Maybe we should have a rule not to create new MSN outage bugs within 24 hours of it happening to avoid clogging Launchpad if it resolves itself again.. -- Unable to retrieve MSN Address Book https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288948] Re: upload extremely slow with iwl3945 (regression intrepid)
The latest version (as of Jan 7 '09) of iwl3945 from the compat-wireless project seems to fix this. On another person's open wireless network: Intrepid's version: up: 1.0 MBit/s, down: 3.7 MBit/s compat-wireless version: up: 3.1 MBit/s, down: 2.7 MBit/s Seems to be much better. However, I couldn't test on my own wireless network because compat-wireless's iwl3945 simply wouldn't connect to my WPA2 network. I hope that'll be fixed so we can get some concrete results. -- upload extremely slow with iwl3945 (regression intrepid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288948] Re: upload extremely slow with iwl3945 (regression intrepid)
Hello there! I have exactly the same problem. According to iperf, my computer has an upload speed of about 4MBits / sec. That means about 500Kbytes/sec. However, all other computers have an upload speed of about 10 Mbits/sec. The interesting thing is that download speed is right where it should be, 10 Mbits/sec. Perhaps this is because acknowledging the packets when they arrive takes far less bandwidth than sending them? For what it's worth, I'm running a Linksys WRT54G Wireless G network. My surrounding environment is pretty crowded with other networks, but it's interesting because other hosts do not experience this slowdown. To show that this is a wireless issue, I used iperf to do a little digging in different network configurations. The numbers are from memory, but I believe they're reasonably accurate. WPA2, wireless: Up: ~4MBit/s, down: ~10Mbit/s Moving right next to the router: Up: ~7Mbit/s, down: ~11Mbit/s Open wireless: Up: ~7Mbit/s, down: ~12Mbit/s Hardwired to the router, all other hosts wireless: Up: ~24Mbit/s, down: ~26Mbit/s If somebody'd like, I can re-run the tests and give you exact results. -- upload extremely slow with iwl3945 (regression intrepid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231995] Re: AssertionError uploading images to Facebook
Sadly, this fails for me too. The last line on my console is this: If you'd like, I can provide the full log of what happens. -- AssertionError uploading images to Facebook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251252] Re: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-21-generic causes kernel panic when unloading Intel Wireless driver
Hey, upgrading to the latest version of linux-backports- modules-2.6.24-21-generic fixed this bug completely for me. Plus, now I get to be mesmerized by the little blinking wireless LED. Thanks, everyone! You all rock. -- linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-21-generic causes kernel panic when unloading Intel Wireless driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk
Hey guys, Let's use this bug tracker to get the problem fixed. Can we please keep the discussion of whether or not to pull the CD image to the forums or mailing lists? This is a place to talk about the bug *itself* and how to get the bug *itself* fixed, not to discuss the implications of this bug. I bet we can get this dilemma fixed MUCH faster if we stop pointing fingers, stop bickering about what to do with the CD image, and start hacking. Why do I say this? Nicorac posted a link to the Linux Kernel Mailing list. I'll repost it here so you don't have to scroll up: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/368 >From the page: "Currently we (Intel Ethernet) are reproducing the issue on multiple machines in house, we are working on the issue with the other core Linux teams here at Intel and within the community. No resolution yet but we are much closer now. Later we will post patches to help users who have had this problem restore their eeprom from either a saved image from ethtool -e or from another identical system." This means that your hardware is NOT permanently bricked. When someone writes the Lazarus program to resurrect your NIC from the dead, everything will be OK and your computer will return to normal. So, because your hardware is not permanently in danger, let's focus on getting the bug fixed now before 8.10 ships and clean up the aftermath later. -- [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk
If we don't pull the images (we should, but I won't comment since it's already being discussed), it might be a good idea to at least make the words "permanently inoperable" on the Alpha 6 testing page in big, bold letters so users have less of a chance to skim over that part. Think about it: How many times do we read warning labels on the stuff we eat? My point exactly. Having a "WARNING" section on a testing page where people are already expecting things not to work perfectly might not be an accurate indicator of exactly how grave this problem really is. I think we should do everything in our power to at least let users know what they're dealing with here. Somehow, we've managed to produce a stick of dynamite with a lit fuse. A lot of people are expecting testing images to be imperfect and may skip right over the warning section because they already know the typical "This is just alpha software, hopefully nothing major will happen" lecture that warning sections typically give them. Making "permanently inoperable" in bold letters will make it much more eye-catching than it is now. -- [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258026] Re: Kernel Panic on suspend, 2.6.24-21-generic
Forgot to post the URL to bug #251252 , sorry about that: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251252 -- Kernel Panic on suspend, 2.6.24-21-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258026] Re: Kernel Panic on suspend, 2.6.24-21-generic
This bug could be related to #251252 Does everyone here have an Intel PROWireless 3945? People in the bug I mentioned have problems with unloading the driver, where a 'rmmod iwl3945' always causes a kernel panic. -- Kernel Panic on suspend, 2.6.24-21-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258026 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247512] Re: Edge Flip DnD doesn't work
I have this exact problem. Completely wiping my compiz configuration didn't help to fix it, I'm afraid. After a quick chat with someone in #compiz-fusion in freenode, it seems like this problem doesn't affect the current git version of compiz. I think it's a package in Hardy. -- Edge Flip DnD doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208718] Re: nvidia-glx-new driver displays white screen of death
Hey all! Here's an attached version of my Xorg.conf file with the driver shipped with Ubuntu. Of particular interest is lots of "EDID" failures. Please note that these error messages do not appear with the latest Nvidia driver. So what gives? How do we disable EDID in the Xorg or something? ** Attachment added: "Xorg.conf of the driver shipped with ubuntu" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15612829/Xorg.0.log -- nvidia-glx-new driver displays white screen of death https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
Hey all! I've browsed through the NVIDIA Linux forums, namely this thread: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=114858 and have come to some reasonable conclusions based on what I found there. 1. Firefox uses XRender to display pages now 2. NVIDIA cards are slow with xrender: http://www.larsen-b.com/Article/290.html Possibly meaning that because of a bug in the NVIDIA driver, XRender does some work it shouldn't have to and therefore spikes in CPU usage. Does gnome-terminal use xrender as well? That could explain its poor performance as well. Also: 3. People who experience this bug will have poor scrolling speed (with at least Firefox) in pages like http://www.tuaw.com/ and http://shame.tuxfamily.org/repo/?cat=1 4. According to http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1693884&postcount=40 , NVIDIA knows about the problem. They have created a fix, but it simply hasn't been released yet. They say that the fix "... will be available in a future driver release." I don't know how right I am, but we might just have to wait and see. -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231224] Re: Pidgin tells me MSN server is unavailible
Epic. It seems fixed now, and we didn't even have to submit a patch. Should this bug be closed? -- Pidgin tells me MSN server is unavailible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231224] Re: Pidgin tells me MSN server is unavailible
It just started working for me. Like literally, *just*. I opened pidgin, and disabled every other account except my MSN one (which failed to connect, not surprisingly) to make looking at the log file easier I then ran pidgin with --debug and captured the log to a file. To my surprise, it connected. Now, pidgin works normally even without debug and other accounts. Is it like this for everyone, or am I just lucky? Here's my successful log if you'd like it. ** Attachment added: "Pidgin --debug: A sucessful attempt at connecting to MSN" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14566434/pidgin.log -- Pidgin tells me MSN server is unavailible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226758] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 LTS to 8.04 LTS causes the upgrade to fail
** Attachment added: "A traceback of the crash" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14214427/traceback.txt -- Upgrading from 8.04 LTS to 8.04 LTS causes the upgrade to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226758 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226758] [NEW] Upgrading from 8.04 LTS to 8.04 LTS causes the upgrade to fail
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I upgraded from 7.10 to 8.04. It worked well. Just for kicks, I burned myself an 8.04 LTS server CD. I inserted it into my 8.04 LTS desktop system and ran the upgrade. It went through the "Preparing the upgrade" item, but before it finished the "Setting software sources" item, it said that I was up-to-date. I clicked OK, and then the upgrade manager crashed. Here's the backtrace if you want it. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgrading from 8.04 LTS to 8.04 LTS causes the upgrade to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226758 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212837] Re: [Hardy] gnome-volume-properties should also manage CDs
Same here. "Removable Drives" implies flash drives and CDs, and is very misleading. I couldn't even find out where these preferences were until I read the above comments (Thanks, Dave!) Here's a screenshot of my setup. As you can see, there's no CD / drive tabs like there were in Gutsy. ** Attachment added: "gnome-volume-properties.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14202722/gnome-volume-properties.png -- [Hardy] gnome-volume-properties should also manage CDs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
Thanks, J! Adding Option "UseEvents" "True" to my device section seemed to bring Xorg down to a more usable state. Xorg now eats up about 0-50% of my CPU instead of over 90% For the reccord, I has an Nvidia 8400M GS on a Dell Vostro 1500 with 2GB of ram, 1.4Ghz dual core CPU, sporting Compiz Fusion with only the latest plugins, tricked out on the NVIdia driver 173.08 beta released on April 10 (which by the way, can be found here: http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_173.08.html), all topped off to go with Ubuntu Hardy running up-to-date as of May 1. Good luck, fellow Nvidia users! -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
Sorry about the double post, but I forgot to mention that I was using compiz fusion. -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
I can confirm this too. Dell vostro 1500, Intel core2duo 1.4GHZ, 2GB ram, Nvidia 8400M GS, Nvidia beta driver from their website. It could be related to firefox... -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208718] Re: nvidia-glx-new driver displays white screen of death
This problem also exists with the 8400M GS on a Dell Vostro 1500. I haven't tried the beta driver, and I'd rather stick with the ubuntu packages. -- nvidia-glx-new driver displays white screen of death https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198523] Re: Optical Audio Out Plays At Wrong Speed..
This may be a duplicate of Bug #172654 -- Optical Audio Out Plays At Wrong Speed.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154549] Re: wi-fi connection goes down - reboot is required
I can confirm this on my Dell Vostro 1500. Some things happen: *I can't use sudo *I can't start most programs (e.g. gnome-terminal refuses to run, but say gnome calculator works). If the program is already running, it seems to be fine. *The hardware wifi killswitch does absolutely nothing. If the wireless card was on, it doesn't turn off the card, even though it normally does. *NM still reports a connection, but says the connection quality is 0%. If it helps, I'm also running the NVidia binary driver. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep -i wireless 0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) -- wi-fi connection goes down - reboot is required https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154549] Re: wi-fi connection goes down - reboot is required
Oh, yeah- also forgot to report that this happens very randomly, e.g. I can't do any one thing to reproduce it. Happens about once per every two days or so for me. -- wi-fi connection goes down - reboot is required https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154549 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188752] Re: Keep needing to re-enable printer
Hmm, interestingly, this only seems to happen when the first job was a network job- when you print locally, it seems to work fine for me. -- Keep needing to re-enable printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188752] Re: Keep needing to re-enable printer
** Changed in: hal-cups-utils (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => hal-cups-utils -- Keep needing to re-enable printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 164945] Re: HAL does not correctly disable/enable print queues for HP printers if they are turned of/turned on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 188752 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188752 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 188752 Keep needing to re-enable printer -- HAL does not correctly disable/enable print queues for HP printers if they are turned of/turned on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188752] Re: Keep needing to re-enable printer
Confirmed over here. I turn on the computer. The printer shows up as running, but when I print something, the first job (after the reboot) never prints, I have to go to the cups WebUI and "start" the printer. After that, it works great. Printer: HP LaserJet 1200 Driver: Foomatic/hpijs Device URI: hp:/usb/HP_LaserJet_1200?serial=00CNCY198362 OS: Gutsy, updated as of this writing. -- Keep needing to re-enable printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
