Re: [Bug 1744459] [NEW] xscreensaver does not provide absolute visual protection

2018-01-20 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Insofar as this may be considered a bug instead of a feature, it is a
bug in either your window manager, Wine, or Steam. There's nothing
xscreensaver can do about it.

https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/faq.html#popup-windows

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744459

Title:
  xscreensaver does not provide absolute visual protection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1744459/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 924278] xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

2017-07-10 Thread Jamie Zawinski
On Mon Jul 10 2017 13:06:57, Jarno Suni <924...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Could the "Disable Screen Saver" mode be changed to not change DPMS
> settings, when not locked?

No, absolutely not, for the reasons I've said. If you are running
xscreensaver, it is in charge of DPMS, period. That is by design and
will not change.

I don't understand what is wrong with your machine that you suffer the
problems you describe, but breaking xscreensaver's connection to DPMS is
no solution.

--
Jamie Zawinski  https://www.jwz.org/  https://www.dnalounge.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924278

Title:
  xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/924278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 924278] xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

2017-07-10 Thread Jamie Zawinski
On Mon Jul 10 2017 10:45:46, Sworddragon <924...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> The DPMS settings in xscreensaver-demo are not grayed out on my system,
> DPMS is there enabled but it never kicks in.

Ok well that shouldn't be. I don't know what's wrong.

> Why is it a "terrible idea" if it would in this case?

There's no sensible way to have both systems, xscreensaver and xset,
control these settings, because there's no way to know which one was
used last. Updates are not timestamped. So one has to be in control and
override the other or chaos ensues.

--
Jamie Zawinski  https://www.jwz.org/  https://www.dnalounge.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924278

Title:
  xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/924278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 924278] xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

2017-07-10 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Whether xscreensaver-demo's DPMS settings are grayed out depends on one
and only one thing: whether XQueryExtension "DPMS" says "yes" or "no".

If what you are trying to say is, "I have a feature request, and that is
for xscreensaver not do anything at all about DPMS and let it be 100%
handled by xset instead", my answer to that is "no, I think that is a
terrible idea".

--
Jamie Zawinski  https://www.jwz.org/  https://www.dnalounge.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924278

Title:
  xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/924278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1407119] Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
You should probably ask these questions here: https://what-if.xkcd.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407119

Title:
  Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1407119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1407119] Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
The only bug here is that your distro is not shipping up-to-date
software.

xscreensaver is behaving as intended.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407119

Title:
  Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1407119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1319418] [NEW] Locking the screen over lxpanel results in an error

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
I don't know where the problem lies, but it's not in xscreensaver.
Something, possibly your panel, is holding the mouse grabbed. There is
no way for xscreensaver to function if it can't get a mouse grab.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319418

Title:
  Locking the screen over lxpanel results in an error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1319418/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1407119] [NEW] Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
If your distro refuses to ship current versions of my software, then my
preference is that your distro not ship my software at all.

I'm completely serious. If you're not going to keep xscreensaver up to
date, then I request that you please remove xscreensaver from your
distro.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407119

Title:
  Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1407119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1407119] [NEW] Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Here's a better idea -- why don't you switch to a distro that doesn't
force software on you that is thirteen months old and six releases
behind?

It is unconscionable that your distro is making their users deal with
bugs that were fixed *years* before. That's a despicable way to treat
the users (you) and the developers (me).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1407119

Title:
  Setting splash to False has no effect on outdated-messages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1407119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 924278] [NEW] xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
I think your X server is configured wrong. See the FAQ:
http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/faq.html#dpms-load

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924278

Title:
  xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/924278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1330505] [NEW] Support for a non-daemon mode

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
xscreensaver is a daemon, and that's never going to change. If you want
something that locks your screen that is not a daemon, then xscreensaver
is not the software for you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1330505

Title:
  Support for a non-daemon mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1330505/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1216476] [NEW] Unlimited passwdTimeout

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
No. There is no sensible reason that anyone would want the unlock dialog
to stay on the screen for a week.

Also it will burn your screen. (Yes, this can still happen.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216476

Title:
  Unlimited passwdTimeout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1216476/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1224724] [NEW] Option to overwrite encryption key in memory on locking

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
This is an issue for the PAM stack, not for xscreensaver.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224724

Title:
  Option to overwrite encryption key in memory on locking

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1224724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 924278] [NEW] xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

2015-01-02 Thread Jamie Zawinski
xscreensaver 5.15 is *more than three years old* and *seventeen*
releases behind.

What the hell is wrong with you people?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924278

Title:
  xscreensaver doesn't enable DPMS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/924278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-09-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
So I guess we still don't know what the right thing is to do about this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-07-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
FWIW, Here's the image I tried to email.

** Attachment added: "example of how setting locale breaks japanese"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+attachment/2199612/+files/xscreensaver-5.12-passwd.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-07-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
I strongly suspect that won't work, because calling setlocale() at all
changes things in a way that setlocale(oldlocale) won't restore.  I
believe (though I can't prove it right now) that there's no way to
return to the state of "I never called setlocale at all".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-07-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
On Jul 9, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Nokir wrote:

> If I delete that line with #undef ENABLE_NLS, 5.14 works fine.

Sigh... well it completely screws up the dialog box in Japanese, so
that's not a complete fix.

I wonder if there's some combination of locale settings that would make
it send multi-byte input without also putting it in screw-up-the-fonts
mode.

If this attachment works, it's a picture of the failure mode with
LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 --



** Attachment added: "xscreensaver-5.12-passwd.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923/+attachment/2199532/+files/xscreensaver-5.12-passwd.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-07-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Try playing around with the various locale-related environment variables
before launching the xscreensaver daemon.

It *may* be that to make this work it's necessary for xscreensaver to
call setlocale(), which it did briefly (possibly only in 5.12) but I
turned that off because it screws everything up. See comment in
xscreensaver.c:


  /* It turns out that if we do NLS stuff here, people running in Japanese
 locales get font craziness on the password dialog, presumably because
 it is displaying Japanese characters in a non-Japanese font.  I don't
 understand how to automatically make all this crap work properly by
 default, so until someone sends me a better patch, just leave it off
 and run the daemon in English.  -- jwz, 29-Sep-2010
   */
#undef ENABLE_NLS

#ifdef ENABLE_NLS
  if (!setlocale (LC_ALL, ""))
fprintf (stderr, "locale not supported by C library\n");

  bindtextdomain (GETTEXT_PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR);
  textdomain (GETTEXT_PACKAGE);
#endif /* ENABLE_NLS */

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-07-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
On Jul 9, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Kiran Majer wrote:

> Yep, tested 5.14 with the i386 and amd64 oneiric binaries  on my natty
> systems and it's still the same issue: when entering '€' no star appears
> and unlocking doesn't work.

Beats me.  It works on my machine.  So at this point, someone who is
actually experiencing this problem is going to have to debug it.

Look at xscreensaver/lock.c around line 1741.  There are some commented-
out debugging printfs there.

--
Jamie Zawinski  http://www.jwz.org/  http://www.dnalounge.com/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-03-06 Thread Jamie Zawinski
I appreciate the effort, but this patch cannot be correct.

First of all, the documentation for XLookupString clearly says, "the
KeySym is mapped, if possible, to an ISO Latin-1 character or (if the
Control modifier is on) to an ASCII control character".

In other words, XLookupString only works on Latin1 single-byte
characters.

You seem to be in an environment where XLookupString is returning 4-byte
characters that also happen to be Unicode.  I see no documentation to
suggest that A) this can ever happen, or B) if it did happen, that those
bytes would be Unicode!  Unless you can find some documentation to this
effect, I cannot depend on this behavior in XScreenSaver.

And this, especially, is wrong:

>  /* Bytes with bitmask 10xx are aditional bytes, search for first
byte of character */

Bytes with 10 as their highest two bits are perfectly valid Latin1
characters, ranging from A0 (nonbreaking space) through BF (inverted
question-mark), and including many common symbols like "copyright",
"paragraph", and "1/4".

I suspect the "right" way to fix this is to use XwcLookupString(), which
returns a wchar_t, instead of XLookupString(), but I couldn't begin to
guess how I take the wchar_t* array and convert it into something that I
can stick in a pam_response structure and have it work.  (Or, even
worse, run it through crypt() and compare it to what's in /etc/passwd.)

In summary: I'm glad you found a way to make it work on your particular
computer, with your particular set of environment variable settings, but
until someone shows me a theory of operation explaining why this should
work at all, I can't use this code.

Thanks...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

2011-01-20 Thread Jamie Zawinski
I don't know why this would fail, and I don't know how to debug it.  The
code looks correct to me.  I suspect the place to start looking is
somewhere around

  int size = XLookupString (event, s, 1, 0, compose_status);

on line 1701 of driver/lock.c.

Please let me know if you figure it out...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923

Title:
  In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 181940] Re: Turn off monitor via xrandr crashes xscreensaver in resize_screensaver_window()

2008-07-07 Thread Jamie Zawinski
FYI, updated patch:
http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/xscreensaver-randr-patch-2.txt
http://jwz.livejournal.com/908354.html

-- 
Turn off monitor via xrandr crashes xscreensaver in resize_screensaver_window()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 181940] Re: Turn off monitor via xrandr crashes xscreensaver in resize_screensaver_window()

2008-07-05 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Please try this patch against xscreensaver 5.05 and let me know if it
helps?

http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/xscreensaver-randr-patch.txt

(Please don't distribute builds incorporating this patch -- it's not
tested well enough yet.  Consider it a dangerous alpha.)

Things I'm interested in hearing about:

- Systems with multiple monitors.  Do all monitors go
  black when xscreensaver activates?

- Adding and removing monitors while the screen is not
  blanked.  Does it look right once the screen blanks?

- Adding and removing monitors while the screen is
  already blanked.  Does everything reconfigure properly?

- Changing the resolution of the monitor(s) using the
  "xrandr" command.

- Does it correctly realize which monitors are actually
  attached to the system and in use?

- Does it work with multiple X screens (the :0.1 style)?

- Does it work when using the old Xinerama extension
  instead of RANDR.

- Does it work using the VidMode extension to zoom and pan
  around (that is, "monitor" and "desktop" are different
  resolutions, via Ctrl-Alt-KP_Plus and KP_Minus.)

There is a bug if:

- It ever crashes (obviously!)

- There is ever a situation where a screen is not
  completely covered by the xscreensaver windows.
  (Unless two screens are configured to overlap).

Thanks!

-- 
Turn off monitor via xrandr crashes xscreensaver in resize_screensaver_window()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 199675] [NEW] configure-x.sh generates broken xorg.conf files from lts.conf

2008-03-07 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ltsp-client-core

Many of the options available in /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf
don't work properly.

There are five different bugs here; forgive me for lumping them
all together, but they all come to down to "configure-x.sh is
pretty broken".


1: When I specify

XKBOPTIONS = "ctrl:nocaps"

it is ignored, because it is overridden by
/opt/ltsp/i386/etc/default/console-setup.
The priority of those should go the other way.


2: When I specify

X_MOUSE_DEVICE = "/dev/gpmdata"
X_MOUSE_PROTOCOL   = "MouseSystems"

I get a "Mouse1" that does that, but "Mouse0" is still using 
/dev/input/mice!  The reason that I'm using gpm is so that I
can re-map the mouse buttons, and this doesn't help at all.
When I specify X_MOUSE_DEVICE, it must *override* the default
mouse, not turn into an *additional* mouse.


3: Furthermore, it creates an xorg.conf file with a syntax error.
It writes:

Option  Device /dev/gpmdata

but that causes an error unless those strings are quoted, like:

Option  "Device" "/dev/gpmdata"


4: There is no way to turn off DPMS.  I need a way to add the line

Option  "DPMS" "off"


5: There is no way to specify that the DRI module must not be loaded.
I need a way to *delete* the line

Load  "dri"


DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 7.10"

ltsp-client-core:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 5.0.39
  Version table:
 5.0.39 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com gutsy/main Packages

** Affects: ltsp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
configure-x.sh generates broken xorg.conf files from lts.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 239] Re: allows applications to popup above xscreensaver (which is locking the screen)

2007-03-09 Thread Jamie Zawinski
Not an xscreensaver bug.  See
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154529

I assume what you are seeing is an OverrideRedirect window.  That means
it is imposible for either xscreensaver or metacity to intercept it.

-- 
allows applications to popup above xscreensaver (which is locking the screen)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/239

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs