Re: [Bug 104006] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-20 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Sebastien Bacher schreef:
> did you get the crash while getting the log?
>
>   
Hi Sebastien,

No I didn't. I just ran Valgrind untill it stopped. In the mean time my 
Ubuntu install has been updated a few times already and haven't had any 
crashes yet. Sorry, I guess there is no confirmation for this one (or it 
is fixed which would be better ;-) )

Thanks

Jan

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 106063] Re: MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.23 kernel upgrade

2007-04-13 Thread Jan Stedehouder
FredBezies schreef:
> 19 duplicates are surely 19 or so idiots who are whining.
>
> Are you taking those persons for complete idiot and you the only really
> clever one ?
No, but the other ones didn't whine and stated they would switch to 
Debian Etch because of a bug in a release that is still tested for bugs. 
You did.

The key issue is this: if you want to have a stable distribution stay 
out of the pre-release cycle. That will save you all disappointments. By 
using Feisty now, even a week before the final release, you have joined 
the group of alfa/beta testers whose primary purpose is to 
find/stumble/crash into the bugs and report them. Complaining about the 
bug and then saying goodbye to Ubuntu in exchange for Debian Etch, 
well... that's for another forum.


Or I have to learn again computing after 18 years of computing.



Maybe, if you didn't know this could happen. I am involved in computing
for 23 years and still learn new things.

Take care

Jan

-- 
MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.23 kernel upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106063
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 106063] Re: MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.24 kernel upgrade

2007-04-13 Thread Jan Stedehouder
FredBezies schreef:
> Lucky ? In a way.
>
> I decided to move feisty to /dev/null. I am now using debian etch, maybe
> older and obsolete in some way, but I will be sure I won't face such
> badly rotten kernels !
>
> Bye ubuntu for the year and half with a such great OS, but you've lost
> my trust :(
>
>   
Sorry, but this is a bit of nonsense. Feisty isn't even considered 
stable yet, you are playing with something in the alpha stage. If you 
can't stand the heat, stay away from the fire. Now, it's just whining 
over something you should expect at this point. Comparing Feisty with 
Debian Etch is unjust, both for Feisty and for Debian Etch.

Enjoy the ride.

-- 
MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.24 kernel upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106063
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 106063] Re: MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.24 kernel upgrade

2007-04-13 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Just in case it might be useful: I can still boot into kernel 2.6.20-13,
but it then defaults to Xfce instead of Gnome (I have Gnome, Xfce and
KDE installed, with Gnome as default). Of course, it is something that
can be changed without any problem, but since it happened after the
kernel upgrade...

-- 
MASTER: Computer will not boot after 2.6.20-14.24 kernel upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106063
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 106102] Laptop won't boot after kernel update to 2.6.20-14

2007-04-12 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

I updated Feisty Fawn this morning (via Synaptic) and did a regular reboot. 
There is a new entry in GRUB for a new kernel 2.6.20-14 generic, but that one 
won't boot the laptop. Instead I see the following error message:
[9.72.] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno= -19)

Machine specifications:
Acer Aspire 3681  WXMi, 512 MB DDR2 RAM, Intel Celeron M 410, Mobile Intel 940 
GML Express Chipset, 802.11 b/g wifi

I can still boot into the laptop using the 2.6.20-13 generic kernel, so
I have to assume that the problem is related to the new kernel.

** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Laptop won't boot after kernel update to 2.6.20-14
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104152] Re: [apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder

** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213453/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213454/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213455/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213456/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213457/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Registers.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213458/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213459/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7213460/ThreadStacktrace.txt

-- 
[apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104152] [apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: totem

No idea why this happened. I was playing with the wifi drivers.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr  7 17:22:59 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem-video-thumbnailer
Package: totem-xine 2.18.1-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-video-thumbnailer -s 128 
file:///media/sda2/windows/clock.avi /tmp/.gnome_thumbnail.ZSEOQT
ProcCwd: /home/jan
ProcEnviron:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: totem
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libxine.so.1
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Uname: Linux jan-laptop 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev 
powerdev scanner video

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 104006] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Sebastien Bacher schreef:
> Thanks for your bug report. Could you try to get a valgrind log for it
> (you can follow the instructions from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind
> for that)?
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
>Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
>   
Okay, I hope this is what you were looking for. My first time with Valgrind.

Thank you for your hard work.

Kindest regards

Jan Stedehouder

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104075] Re: [apport] flumotion-manager crashed with AttributeError in ()

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7212200/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7212201/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7212202/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7212203/Traceback.txt

-- 
[apport] flumotion-manager crashed with AttributeError in ()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104075] [apport] flumotion-manager crashed with AttributeError in ()

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: flumotion

I was installing a series of programs from the Audio/Video Category

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr  7 13:27:55 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/flumotion-manager
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5
Package: flumotion 0.2.1-1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/flumotion-manager -D -n default 
/etc/flumotion/managers/default/planet.xml
ProcCwd: /
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=nl_NL:nl
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/sh
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/flumotion-manager', '-D', '-n', 'default', 
'/etc/flumotion/managers/default/planet.xml']
SourcePackage: flumotion
Uname: Linux jan-laptop 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux

** Affects: flumotion (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] flumotion-manager crashed with AttributeError in ()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 104006] Symbolic threaded stack trace

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Apport retracing service schreef:
> ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt (retraced)"
>http://librarian.launchpad.net/7211141/%3Cfdopen%3E
>
>   
Sure, if that is of help I am happy to do that. I just had another of 
those crashes so it shouldn't be too hard to gather data.

Regards


Jan

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104006] Re: [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder

** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193617/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193618/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193619/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193620/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193621/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Registers.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7193622/Registers.txt

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 104006] [apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-04-07 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

Nothing much to tel.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr  7 09:29:05 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
Package: gnome-panel 2.18.0-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1
ProcCwd: /home/jan
ProcEnviron:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
Stacktrace:
 #0  0xb752f9a4 in ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
 #1  0x080cdf60 in ?? ()
 #2  0x in ?? ()
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
ThreadStacktrace:
 .
 Thread 1 (process 5600):
 #0  0xb752f9a4 in ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
 #1  0x080cdf60 in ?? ()
 #2  0x in ?? ()
Uname: Linux jan-laptop 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev 
powerdev scanner video

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95980] Re: [apport] BloGTK.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()

2007-03-25 Thread Jan Stedehouder

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6933447/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6933448/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6933449/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6933450/Traceback.txt

-- 
[apport] BloGTK.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95980

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95980] [apport] BloGTK.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()

2007-03-25 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: blogtk

Nothing to say really. It crashed on start up. I was using Feisty Fawn

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Mar 25 18:29:05 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/blogtk/BloGTK.py
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.4
Package: blogtk 1.1-2build1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: python2.4 /usr/bin/BloGTK
ProcCwd: /home/jan
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/BloGTK']
SourcePackage: blogtk
Uname: Linux jan-feisty 2.6.20-12-generic #2 SMP Wed Mar 21 20:55:46 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux

** Affects: blogtk (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] BloGTK.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95980

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 85806] Re: [apport] software-properties-gtk crashed with NameError in add_source()

2007-02-17 Thread Jan Stedehouder

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6461018/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6461019/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6461020/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/6461021/Traceback.txt

-- 
[apport] software-properties-gtk crashed with NameError in add_source()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85806

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 85806] [apport] software-properties-gtk crashed with NameError in add_source()

2007-02-17 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Public bug reported:

Well, there isn't much to say. I was updating Herd 3 and installing KDE
and XfcE.

ProblemType: Crash
Date: Sat Feb 17 15:14:22 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5
Package: software-properties-gtk 0.55
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
ProcCwd: /home/jan
ProcEnviron:
 
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
 LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/software-properties-gtk']
SourcePackage: software-properties
Uname: Linux jan-feisty 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] software-properties-gtk crashed with NameError in add_source()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85806

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 69054] Re: OPC failed

2006-10-29 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Of course I needed to continue working and so the testing continued as
well. I might have found the cause and the solution to the problem.

By default Ubuntu mounts empty optical disks using Nautilus Burner. I
immediately click ignore once it pops up and I find it more of a
nuisance than anything else. There is an option to disable that option (
System-> Preferences -> Removable Stations), but I hadn't done that yet.

When the OPC Failed problem occured again this afternoon the idea popped
up to disable the above mentioned option. I have burned two DVD's since,
the last one with an altered project name again and it started without a
problem.

My hypothesis is now the following: while mounting the disk, Nautilus
Burner starts up some processes and/or applications that are also being
used by K3b at the time. The time frame between me pressing the Ignore
button in Nautilus Burner and starting a new burn process in K3b is too
short. The conflict results in K3b not being able to start the optimum
power calibration. Short is in this case between 10 and 30 seconds (I
can click fast).

I will continue testing and try to find the processes involved.

-- 
OPC failed
https://launchpad.net/bugs/69054

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 22667] Re: 2.6.12 and above create 100% CPU with xorg on iMac

2006-09-30 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Just to add a note that I experienced the same problem last week on my
iMac Indigo (500 Mhz, 768 Mb RAM). I downloaded the most recent versions
of Ubuntu alternate and Xubuntu alternate (the regular ones would not
boot) and attempted to install them.

After installing it took a very long time for GDM to load and the screen
to be drawn. After login I could move the mouse freely, but after
clicking on a menu item the system froze. Only a hard reset was
possible.

Debian Sarge and Debian Sid don't have the same problem. Sarge is
running 2.6.8 kernel by default. I tried Yellowdog on the same box and
it didn't have this problem as well. It seems to be specific to Ubuntu.

The suggested DRI and FBDev options work fine both in Yellowdog and
Debian Sarge/Sid and did not have to be uncommented on my box.

-- 
2.6.12 and above create 100% CPU with xorg on iMac
https://launchpad.net/bugs/22667

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57153] Re: [Bug 57153] Solution Proposal

2006-08-26 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Robert Penz schreef:
> I propose following solution:
>
> 1. add a menu point to grub name "Rescue Mode"
> 2. boot into an low Runlevel
> 3. start a dialog-based console program which has following features
>
> -  look for and install updates
> -  look at the installation history and remove possible updates (sorted by 
> install time)
> - show last boot log (parses the syslog for the new syslog start and shows 
> the last lines before it.) 
> - start networking
>   + Show Emergency Information from Ubuntu (lynx without navigation or 
> something like this)
>   + Rescue Support Channel  (Text based minimal IRC which just joins just the 
> #ubuntu-rescue  channel on freenode)
>
> With this even a user which doesn't know anything about the user can get
> help/information.
>
> ps: you can also start that menu if the xserver start fails during
> booting
>
>   
This suggestion has some valid points, but I wouldn't mind taking this a 
bit further.  Why not integrate system restore into Linux and into the 
menu? I mean, that is one of the things that I have found very useful in 
Windows XP and I know that many XP users have used that feature on more 
than one occasion. Mind you, I don't know enough of what this will take, 
or if there are any security issues associated with it.

The networking feature looks okay, but might be a bit daunting for 
people with only GUI experience. Joining IRC seems nice, but who is 
going to answer the repetitive questions from the users that experience 
problems. One of the big problems I have noticed over the years is how 
difficult it is for end-users to describe and define the problem. 
Without that it is difficult to solve it. For the newbie user having an 
option to restore everything back to a previous restore point is simple 
and straight forward. Beyond that restore point there should be a fast 
and easy access to what caused the problem in the first place, otherwise 
the end-user will just stop updating his sytem in order to prevent a 
similar thing from happening. This requires a set of analyses tools that 
could take the information in the various logs, compare it to the same 
logs at a previous restore point (the one that was reverted to) and 
present a list of things that could be wrong with links to a website for 
common and specific solutions. That's the kind of process I can 
visualize, but whether it can be implemented I don't know.

-- 
xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: "no screens found"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57153

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57153] Re: [Bug 57153] Re: [Bug 57153] Re: xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: "no screens found"

2006-08-25 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Sylvain Cherrier schreef:
> sidney a écrit :
>   
>> This event probably has done very serious harm to the migration to linux
>> from Windows.
>> 
> [...]
> Well, a Windows user often reinstall his OS... :-(
> because of virus, malware, etc.. etc.. Even with good protections...
>   
I agree. I had to do that once every 6 to 9 months. Reinstalling Ubuntu 
with all the applications took only a fraction of the time that I had to 
spend on getting a fully functional Windows desktop again.


> So, one day broken in Dapper's life is really small in front of what
> happen in Windows's life !!
>
> But, maybe it could be a good idea to think about a way of restarting
> from a previous configuration...
> Maybe booting from Installation CD, and downgrading ? Or something like
> that ?
>
>   
That would definitely be an asset. I tried to use the Ubuntu DVD to 
backup my /home folder, but I couldn't access it that way. Okay, I did 
not really look into it, but the fact is that Knoppix recognized and 
mounted all my partitions (ext3, NTFS and FAT32) making it easy to use 
it in salvage.

Better and easier problem solving tools that won't require extensive CLI 
knowledge would be an improvement.

-- 
xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: "no screens found"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57153

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 57153] Re: xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: "no screens found"

2006-08-24 Thread Jan Stedehouder
Well, I suffered from the same problem earlier this week ( I run an AMD
XP 2400+ box with 512 Mb RAM and an Asus n6200 256 Mb RAM card).
Unfortunately I did not have the time to search for a solution. This is
my production box and I needed it up and running that same moment. For
me this called for a backup of the /home folder and reinstalling Ubuntu
from scratch (which was simple and fast).

Anyway, for me it proves that Linux has improved greatly as far as ease
of installation and ease of use are concerned, but when something goes
wrong there is a serious lack of easy and accessible diagnostic and
repair tools that don't require you to go over esoteric error logs with
tons of information that are useless for the non-geek user. And we have
to be honest, something always can and will go wrong.

http://opensourcelearning.info/blog/?p=46
http://opensourcelearning.info/blog/?p=49

-- 
xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: "no screens found"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57153

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs