[Bug 1973468] [NEW] New Windows from favorites often not working

2022-05-15 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Running Ubuntu 22.04 jammy, firefox 100 from snap.

First time launch from the left launcher (favorites) normally works
fine.  Open a second window using the context menu "New Window" or "Open
a New Windows" (what is the difference?) often just gives the rotating
Ubuntu cursor and no Firefox window is opened.   Sometimes works though,
so you have to try a few times.

^N in an open firefox window work fine.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973468

Title:
  New Windows from favorites often not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1973468/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971992] Re: openssl rmd160 digest broken

2022-05-07 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Thanks.   Not really a bug thus,  I need to provide rmd160 digests in
some workflow.  This is a work-around and a good reason to discuss the
issue upstream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971992

Title:
  openssl rmd160 digest broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1971992/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971992] [NEW] openssl rmd160 digest broken

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Using 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 (AMD64) I get

```
openssl rmd160 < some-file
Error setting digest
405755EFCF7F:error:0308010C:digital envelope 
routines:inner_evp_generic_fetch:unsupported:../crypto/evp/evp_fetch.c:349:Global
 default library context, Algorithm (RIPEMD160 : 99), Properties ()
405755EFCF7F:error:0386:digital envelope 
routines:evp_md_init_internal:initialization error:../crypto/evp/digest.c:252:
```

Other digest types work fine.  Using what is (according to `openssl
version`) the same version of openssl from Macports on a Mac M1 works
fine.

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971992

Title:
  openssl rmd160 digest broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1971992/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883933] Re: gcc-mingw-w64 no symbols in libgcov.a

2021-06-19 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883933

Title:
  gcc-mingw-w64 no symbols in libgcov.a

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1883933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1879989] Re: "Failed to play sound: No such driver" ubuntu 20.04

2021-01-18 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Installing libcanberra-pulse indeed fixes the problem.  Thanks!
Flagging this as "Invalid" seems dubious.  Shouldn't libcanberra-pulse
be a dependency for gnome-control-center or the base sound system?

Sound used to work fine.  Given the number of sound devices I always
used the gnome control center to switch the right device and check it
works before starting Zoom, etc.  The checking failed after the latest
security updates.  After a couple of hours I discovered sound was
actually working properly and it was just the test in the control center
failing.  After running `gnome-control-center sound` on the terminal I
got the message "Failed to play sound: No such driver" and found this
post ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879989

Title:
  "Failed to play sound: No such driver"  ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1879989/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883933] [NEW] gcc-mingw-w64 no symbols in libgcov.a

2020-06-17 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

In Ubuntu 20.04, libgcov.a for MinGW is almost empty:

```
nm -gC /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/9.3-win32/libgcov.a | grep 
__gcov_one_value_profiler
nm: _gcov_merge_ior.o: no symbols
nm: _gcov_merge_time_profile.o: no symbols
nm: _gcov_merge_icall_topn.o: no symbols
nm: _gcov_interval_profiler.o: no symbols
nm: _gcov_interval_profiler_atomic.o: no symbols
```

This breaks profile guided optimization.  These symbols are present in
Ubuntu 18.04 (MinGW-gcc 7.3).

** Affects: gcc-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883933

Title:
  gcc-mingw-w64 no symbols in libgcov.a

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1883933/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1839382] Re: -frtti inconsistent in build (undefined reference to `typeinfo for rocksdb::Comparator')

2020-05-26 Thread Jan Wielemaker
This also applies MergeOperator.   In addition, the static lib is not
compiled with -fPIC and can thus not be used to create a plugin (.so)
for another project.   See also
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3811

** Bug watch added: github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues #3811
   https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/3811

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839382

Title:
  -frtti inconsistent in build (undefined reference to `typeinfo for
  rocksdb::Comparator')

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rocksdb/+bug/1839382/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1574437] Re: valgrind crashes on programs linked to openssl

2016-08-21 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Why is a high priority bug not patched after almost two months while
doing so is trivial?  This blocks anyone using the most valuable
debugging tool who works on an application that is linked to SSL ...

Is there a valgrind PPA as a work-around, or is compiling from source
the only way?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574437

Title:
  valgrind crashes on programs linked to openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valgrind/+bug/1574437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1088146] Re: Asus n56vz battery state is wrong or battery not charging at all.

2013-08-01 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Similar here.  As  far as  I recall, this started rather recently.  About a 
month ago.  System now tells me battery
is always full and will last 4h28.  Led indicator now tells me baterry us not 
present.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088146

Title:
  Asus n56vz battery state is wrong or battery not charging at all.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/1088146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1074662] [NEW] Optimized code fails to assign struct member

2012-11-03 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Hi,

I've upgraded to Ubuntu 12.10 on Intel i7 2600 (64-bit version) and -as a 
developer- compiled SWI-Prolog using
the standard gcc 4.7 compiler.  All seems to work, except for the `semweb' 
package.  It works with compiled
without optimization, but fails at -O2. 

After a bit searching with gdb, it appears that a structure assignment is 
simply omitted.  I've forced it to work
by adding a dummy function and call this using the structure field as argument. 

Not sure how to report this as building the whole system is a bit work.   So, 
I'll first provide a pointer to the
work-around commit.  This can be found at the address below.  The first change 
is irrelevant, but indicates
the location of the missing assignment.

http://www.swi-
prolog.org/git/packages/semweb.git/blobdiff/192d052db9b7c44519723fa3186a5786a1562127..af7fb1bb50ec30295bc2e1a7473bbe36ee0c03bf:/rdf_db.c

The dummy function itself is simply

#if __GNUC__ == 4  __GNUC_MINOR__ == 7
void
gcc_47_dummy(void *ptr)
{ static void *p;

  if ( p != ptr )
p = ptr;
}
#endif

Of course, I know that adding dummy calls can make the difference
without the compiler being at fault, but

  - I can see in gdb that the assignment is not done without the hack.  Of 
course, I also know that gdb 
sometimes does weird things with optimized code.  Adding a print statement 
fixes the problem ...
The failed assignment does however explain subsequent (wrong) behaviour.

I'll leave it here, providing further details as deemed necessary on
request.

  Thanks --- Jan

** Affects: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074662

Title:
  Optimized code fails to assign struct member

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.7/+bug/1074662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993063] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Installation of samba upgrade failed after I selected to keep my own
smb.conf.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed May  2 08:41:45 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120328)
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993063] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993063] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Thanks for having a look.   This isn't a show-stopper for me.  Just an upgrade 
that didn't go smoothly.  Here is
the output you asked for.  I assume I should get rid of the warning :-)

   --- Jan

ct (~) 1_ sudo testparm
[sudo] password for jan: 
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section [homes]
Processing section [media]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [print$]
Loaded services file OK.
WARNING: 'workgroup' and 'netbios name' must differ.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions

[global]
workgroup = CT
server string = %h server (Samba, Ubuntu)
interfaces = eth0, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
obey pam restrictions = Yes
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n 
*Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* .
unix password sync = Yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
dns proxy = No
usershare allow guests = Yes
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
idmap config * : backend = tdb

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
browseable = No

[media]
comment = Media files
path = /misc/media

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
print ok = Yes
browseable = No

[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/printers
ct (~) 2_ echo $?
1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 993063] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Installation of samba upgrade failed after I selected to keep my own
smb.conf.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed May  2 08:41:45 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120328)
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993063] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993063] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-05-02 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Thanks for having a look.   This isn't a show-stopper for me.  Just an upgrade 
that didn't go smoothly.  Here is
the output you asked for.  I assume I should get rid of the warning :-)

   --- Jan

ct (~) 1_ sudo testparm
[sudo] password for jan: 
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section [homes]
Processing section [media]
Processing section [printers]
Processing section [print$]
Loaded services file OK.
WARNING: 'workgroup' and 'netbios name' must differ.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions

[global]
workgroup = CT
server string = %h server (Samba, Ubuntu)
interfaces = eth0, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
obey pam restrictions = Yes
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n 
*Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* .
unix password sync = Yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
dns proxy = No
usershare allow guests = Yes
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
idmap config * : backend = tdb

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
browseable = No

[media]
comment = Media files
path = /misc/media

[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
print ok = Yes
browseable = No

[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/printers
ct (~) 2_ echo $?
1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993063

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/993063/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 773688] Re: Please restore session restore on gnome in natty

2011-06-03 Thread Jan Wielemaker
I use several machines where I want to have some default applications running 
when I login.  The
option to explicitly save the session was perfect for this.   Alternatives are 
buggy, notably because
there is no good way to start applications at a specific desktop from a startup 
script.

  Cheers --- Jan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773688

Title:
  Please restore session restore on gnome in natty

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 685835] [NEW] Deadlock in _XtWaitForSomething() and fork()

2010-12-06 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xorg

Hi,

I just discovered that one can make X11 deadlock in the following way: have a 
multi-threaded
application.  One thread performs a fork().  Another one is waiting in 
XtAppProcessEvent().
This results in the following stack-trace:

#1  0x7faf865dfe29 in _L_lock_6680 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x7faf865dbc04 in free_atfork (mem=0x7faf6820, 
caller=value optimised out) at arena.c:251
#3  0x7faf80aef0a1 in _XtWaitForSomething () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.6
#4  0x7faf80aefefd in XtAppProcessEvent () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.6
application calls

Not sure whether this is an xorg or a glibc issue.  There are several reports 
on glibc
issues with free_tfork() related to signals.  This example does not involve 
signals,
only threads and fork().

Schematically, the deadlocked thread is doing this:

- XtAppAddInput()
- XtAppAddTimeOut()
- XtAppProcessEvent()   deadlock using stack above

Regards --- Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.41-generic 2.6.35.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Dec  6 11:16:31 2010
DkmsStatus:
 fglrx, 8.780, 2.6.35-22-generic, x86_64: installed 
 fglrx, 8.780, 2.6.35-23-generic, x86_64: installed 
 vboxhost, 3.2.10, 2.6.35-22-generic, x86_64: installed 
 vboxhost, 3.2.10, 2.6.35-23-generic, x86_64: installed 
 vboxhost, 3.2.10, 2.6.32-25-generic, x86_64: installed
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027.1)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-23-generic 
root=UUID=1f2fd538-1d8b-4d82-8b75-722b1da9f4d3 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: xorg
dmi.bios.date: 10/28/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 786F6 v02.51
dmi.board.name: 3029h
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: hp323
dmi.chassis.type: 6
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr786F6v02.51:bd10/28/2008:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPCompaqdc5850Microtower:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn3029h:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
dmi.product.name: HP Compaq dc5850 Microtower
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 codename:   maverick
 architecture:   x86_64
 kernel: 2.6.35-23-generic

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685835

Title:
  Deadlock in _XtWaitForSomething() and fork()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 685835] Re: Deadlock in _XtWaitForSomething() and fork()

2010-12-06 Thread Jan Wielemaker


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685835

Title:
  Deadlock in _XtWaitForSomething() and fork()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 515065] [NEW] fesetround(FE_UPWARD) followed by pow() crashes

2010-01-31 Thread Jan Wielemaker
Public bug reported:

The attached program very simple program crashes on a segmentation fault.  
The fragment comes from a much larger program, but it proves easily to
reproduce.

Environment: 64-bit ubuntu 9.10 on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 
5400+
glibc 2.10.1-0ubuntu16 (karmic-updates)  gcc 4.4.1.

Crash is regardless of optimization (tried -O2 and -g)  Compile using

$ gcc -o t t.c -lm
$ ./t

** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: fesetround pow

-- 
fesetround(FE_UPWARD) followed by pow() crashes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 515065] Re: fesetround(FE_UPWARD) followed by pow() crashes

2010-01-31 Thread Jan Wielemaker

** Attachment added: self-contained test-program
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38576901/t.c

-- 
fesetround(FE_UPWARD) followed by pow() crashes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs