[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64562] Re: 80% cpu used apt-index-watch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64531 *** I have the same problem. It causes a rather annoying spike every few seconds in my CPU usage graph (I use the ksysguard taskbar tool). It seems that one of the apt-index-watch processes runs normally and another one launches and dies every few seconds. -- 80% cpu used apt-index-watch https://launchpad.net/bugs/64562 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317781] Re: Ext4 data loss
Hello all - I've experienced this problem also. I forked my sudoers file (didn't use visudo to edit it) so I had to boot into recovery mode to edit it. As soon as I ran visudo the system hard locked and had to be shut down. Upon next bootup /etc/sudoers was a 0B file. I'll guess I'll try to not crash my system for now ;) -- Ext4 data loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness)
I'm here to add my concern for this bug. I'm currently using a jaunty netbook with a 1024x600 resolution and resizing windows "naturally" (using my cursor on a window edge) is almost always an absolute chore if not impossible. On my 1920x1200 desktop computer it's not quite as difficult with my trackball but it's more difficult than it should be. Now, I don't know if a patch that allows for border resizing is the right step. Making the borders larger takes away from screen real estate. Would it be possible to keep the borders at 1px while extending the [invisible] "resize threshold" out 5 or 10 pixels on each side of the border? I haven't used KDE since they released version 4 [ick] but I don't remember having any issues resizing windows with version 3.X - maybe the gnome project can borrow their window resize code? -- Window Resize Difficult (Window Border Thickness) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402767] Re: multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar
I appologize for not reading this entire bug report because I feel vehement about posting my opinion on the plugin. I realize that some of my concerns may have been addressed already. I am merely posting them as another "vote" for how bad of an idea this plugin is. Please obliterate this plugin. It's nothing short of infuriating and it should not see the light of day in Karmic final. Here's what is wrong with this plugin: 1. It makes it practically impossible to get any work done using the search box. If I type "rack server" into the search box my beloved additional search options aren't there. No more links to take me to the images or shopping sections of Google. 2. There are two options at the top of the page after performing a custom search - "Ubuntu Start Page (b)" and "Web Search". Now, one would think that selecting "Web Search" and clicking the search button would take me to the Google I know and love. Nope - it takes me to a page that's almost identical to the "Ubuntu Start Page (b)"! 3. I hate the new tab behavior. If I'm creating a new tab to search for something I will do Ctrl-T then Ctrl-K. I don't need a gimpy version of Google to be loaded every time I create a new tab. I'm a Google person myself, but I could see how that would offend someone who uses Yahoo, etc as their search engine. 4. It's not immediately obvious on how to disable the behavior. I thought it was perhaps a customization done to the search toolbar and tried digging around to find the search engine settings. If you don't kill this plugin with fire, please, please, please don't include it by default. I can't imagine there are many people that expect/desire the behavior offered by this plugin. I appologize for the angry rant tone, but I feel very strongly about this and I believe it will turn a lot of people off of Ubuntu. It frustrated the heck out of me and I've been using Linux since 1999. Get off my lawn! Note: I am NOT currently using Firefox 3.5. This plugin came enabled by default when I installed Karmic daily about a month ago with the included version of Firefox (3.0.X). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/402767 -- multisearch add on blocks the functionality of firefox location bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
