[Bug 99145] Re: GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2009-11-04 Thread Jeff Abbott
I'd test it again, but I no longer have either of these laptops.  The
font appears just fine on my Dell Latitude D630, for what it's worth.

-- 
GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99145
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 250211] Re: Intrepid: WLAN LED blinks incessantly on iwl3945 | iwl4965 laptop

2009-02-11 Thread Jeff Abbott
I'd tried the above script(s) on my Dell Latitude D630, with an iwl3945,
running Intrepid x86_64 to no avail.  However, once I started poking
around at the different trigger files under /sys/class/leds/iwl-phy0\:*
I did find that the following worked for me:


#!/bin/sh

if [ "$IFACE" = "wlan0" ]; then
echo none > /sys/class/leds/iwl-phy0\:assoc/trigger
fi


Neither the TX nor RX directory's trigger files seemed to have any effect, and 
I could shut the LED off completely by echoing "none" to the radio directory's 
trigger file.

-- 
Intrepid: WLAN LED blinks incessantly on iwl3945 | iwl4965 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 304385] Re: crash in account_changed ()

2009-01-15 Thread Jeff Abbott
I also had this issue on a freshly installed laptop running Intrepid.
Enabling intrepid-proposed and only installing evolution (and its
updated dependencies, of course) seems to have fixed the problem.
Thanks, Sebastien and Steve!

-- 
crash in account_changed ()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50254] Re: Ctrl-Backspace should stop_at_punctuation

2008-01-08 Thread Jeff Abbott
Thanks, at least, for the explanation, Alexander.

-- 
Ctrl-Backspace should stop_at_punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50254
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 50254] Re: Ctrl-Backspace should stop_at_punctuation

2008-01-04 Thread Jeff Abbott
I agree that this change should be the default on Ubuntu.  As someone
who uses multiple platforms this is quite irritating, and I'm glad to
have at least found a solution I can use on my own thanks to this
Launchpad entry.  For what it's worth, this preference is set to true in
both Windows and Mac OS X Firefox builds (except, of course, in Mac OS X
the key sequence is option+delete instead of ctrl+backspace).

I don't know if we should be considering consistency with other Unix
applications and platforms -- which seems to be Mozilla's point of view,
and rightly so for them -- so much as consistency with other Ubuntu apps
and other platforms with which many of us work on a daily basis.
"Muscle memory" accounts for a lot of my productivity, and I'd imagine
I'm not alone in this.

-- 
Ctrl-Backspace should stop_at_punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50254
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 111863] Re: uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-18 Thread Jeff Abbott
Michah,

Thank you very much for that informative reply -- that clarifies the
Ubuntu uname situation immensely.  I do wonder why RHEL/CentOS (and
possibly other distros) behave differently, but this isn't an
appropriate discussion venue for that.  I would question why Ubuntu
doesn't follow suit, but your reasoning based on the information above
is sound enough for me.

Thanks,
Jeff

-- 
uname -i and -p report "unknown"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] Re: [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-05-17 Thread Jeff Abbott
That does do the trick, Barry.  Of course, then the text labels on the
splash screen during login are mighty small.  :-\

I'm not sure what the best workaround to this might be, or even if
there's one that could be considered good enough to use by default.

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99145
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 111863] uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-02 Thread Jeff Abbott
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: coreutils

I've got several hosts running Feisty, and both "uname -i" and "uname
-p" report "unknown."  Some examples:

PowerMac G4 -- 933MHz PowerPC G4

uname -i:
unknown
uname -p:
unknown
uname -m:
ppc
uname -a:
   Linux chrysanthemum 2.6.20-15-powerpc #3 Sun Apr 15 06:45:49 UTC 2007 ppc 
GNU/Linux

Dell OptiPlex GX620 -- 3.4GHz Pentium 4 
---
uname -i:
unknown
uname -p:
unknown
uname -m:
x86_64
uname -a:
   Linux nightshade 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 06:17:24 UTC 2007 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

Pengiun Computing Relion 230 -- 2x 2.4GHz Pentium 4 Xeon

uname -i:
unknown
uname -p:
unknown
uname -m:
i686
uname -a:
   Linux dandelion 2.6.20-15-server #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:41:34 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux

HP Compaq nw8440 Mobile Workstation -- 2.0GHz Core Duo T2500

uname -i:
unknown
uname -p:
unknown
uname -m:
i686
uname -a:
Linux dahlia 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 
GNU/Linux

We've also got a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with a single 2.0GHz Xeon 5130 CPU
running CentOS 5, which reports:

uname -i:
x86_64
uname -p:
x86_64
uname -m:
x86_64
uname -a:
Linux HOSTNAME_SCRUBBED 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Apr 9 09:43:24 EDT 2007 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I see behavior similar to the above CentOS 5 example on my i686 CentOS 4
machines.

Both CentOS 5 and Ubuntu Feisty have the same version of uname -- 5.97
-- so I'm not sure what's going on.  Anything else I need to check?

** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
uname -i and -p report "unknown"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111863
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 97669] Re: [feisty] Installing from alternate install CD leaves cdrom source in apt's sources.list

2007-04-18 Thread Jeff Abbott
I also saw similar behavior installing both Feisty and Edgy from the
alternate installation CDs on an x86_64 box.  I guess this means it's an
expected behavior, but I'm not sure why.  Does anyone have any thoughts
on this?

-- 
[feisty] Installing from alternate install CD leaves cdrom source in apt's 
sources.list
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97669
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103733] Re: [apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2007-04-18 Thread Jeff Abbott
Thanks for the instructions, Sebastien, and my apologies for the delay
in updating this.  Unfortunately I've been unable to replicate the
crash, so either it's been fixed or I've just lost my touch.  :-)

We can go ahead and close this report, but if I'm able to make it fail
again I'll get some good debugging info for you and re-open it.

-- 
[apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103733] Re: [apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2007-04-06 Thread Jeff Abbott
I'd be happy to.  Is xchat-gnome-dbgsym a package that needs to be
installed, too?  Because it's not showing up for me for an "apt-get
install."  Sorry for my confusion -- this is the first time I've done
this level of debug work.

-- 
[apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103733] Re: [apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2007-04-06 Thread Jeff Abbott
It took me a few tries to get it to crash running with valgrind, but
once I found a way to reproduce the issue -- hit ctrl+shift+W like a
madman as xchat-gnome is opening -- I ran it three times to give you
three separate valgrind reports.  They're attached.

Please let me know if there's anything else you need from me.

** Attachment added: "Valgrind reports for the reproduced crash"
   
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7189223/valgrind-logs-xchat-gnome_103733.tar.gz

-- 
[apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103733] Re: [apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2007-04-06 Thread Jeff Abbott

** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179641/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179642/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179643/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179644/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179645/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: "Registers.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179646/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179647/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7179648/ThreadStacktrace.txt

-- 
[apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 103733] [apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()

2007-04-06 Thread Jeff Abbott
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xchat-gnome

I was trying to disconnect -- via a right-click -- from the Ubuntu
Server network, and it crashed.  That was the only network to which I
was connected at the time.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Apr  6 09:43:18 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xchat-gnome
Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.16-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: xchat-gnome
ProcCwd: /home/fdivbug
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: xchat-gnome
StacktraceTop:
 g_object_ref () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Uname: Linux nightshade 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 
i686 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse plugdev scanner 
tape

** Affects: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[apport] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_ref()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102620] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the openoffice.org-style-crystal package. Th

2007-04-05 Thread Jeff Abbott
(I was going to attach my term.log here, but it's empty.)

-- 
[apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: 
SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the 
openoffice.org-style-crystal package. This might mean you need to manually fix 
this package.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102620
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102620] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the openoffice.org-style-crystal package. Th

2007-04-05 Thread Jeff Abbott
I encountered this same error with that same package, also when
upgrading from a clean Feisty install to the latest.

** Attachment added: "My apt.log from /var/log/dist-upgrade/"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7176251/apt.log

-- 
[apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: 
SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the 
openoffice.org-style-crystal package. This might mean you need to manually fix 
this package.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102620
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] Re: [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-04-05 Thread Jeff Abbott

** Attachment added: "The GDM appearance on the HP"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7078434/gdm-font-large-hp.png

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99145

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 23497] Re: i8042 unbind required for keyboard/mouse to be useable following suspend/resume & hibernate/resume cycle

2007-04-04 Thread Jeff Abbott
Jon,

That used to fix the problem for me in Edgy with my HP Compaq nw8440, so
it's possible that you're seeing the same issue now.  Try running the
following two commands after waking back up:

  sudo sh -c 'echo -n "i8042" > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/i8042/unbind'
  sudo sh -c 'echo -n "i8042" > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/i8042/bind'

Obviously if you've got no keyboard you'll need to this via ssh or plug
in an external USB keyboard.

If that helps, then the fix listed above would work to resolve the
problem you're seeing with your Dell, too, so I'd snag the suspend and
resume scripts from the patch until they make it into acpi-support
proper.

-- 
i8042 unbind required for keyboard/mouse to be useable following suspend/resume 
& hibernate/resume cycle
https://launchpad.net/bugs/23497

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-04-03 Thread Jeff Abbott
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gdm

I've got two laptops -- an IBM ThinkPad T42 with an ATI Radeon Mobility
9600 using the 'radeon' driver, and an HP Compaq nw8440 with an ATI
FireGL v5200 using 'fglrx' -- and on the HP it looks like the GDM login
window is using a font that's either too large or at too high a DPI.  As
a result, text doesn't fit quite as well as it should in the login
username/password entry field.  I tested with the default Human theme,
as well as HumanCircle, HumanList, and Circles, and they all exhibited
the same oversize font.

The IBM looks fine, so I compared the /etc/gdm/gdm.conf and
/etc/X11/xorg.conf against the HP's.  There were no differences in the
former, and in the latter there were only the expected differences that
one should see when comparing against an xorg.conf from a machine with
different hardware.  I've attached screenshots of both systems, as well
as my gdm.conf and xorg.conf from the problematic HP.

Are there any other configuration files or screenshots you'd like to
see?  Where else should I be looking?  It works just fine as it is, but
it looks a little off and since I consider Ubuntu's highly polished
appearance to be one of its strengths, even the most minor little quirks
stick out like sore thumbs.

Thanks,
Jeff

** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99145

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] Re: [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-03-30 Thread Jeff Abbott

** Attachment added: "The HP's xorg.conf"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7078435/xorg.conf

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99145

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] Re: [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-03-30 Thread Jeff Abbott

** Attachment added: "The HP's gdm.conf"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7078440/gdm.conf

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99145

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99145] Re: [feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI

2007-03-30 Thread Jeff Abbott

** Attachment added: "The GDM appearance on the ThinkPad"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7078433/gdm-font-normal-ibm.png

-- 
[feisty] GDM font seems to be to big or too high DPI
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99145

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 98669] [feisty] PowerPC beta alternate CD image too big

2007-03-29 Thread Jeff Abbott
Public bug reported:

I downloaded the Feisty beta alternate CD image for PowerPC from
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports/releases/7.04/beta/ubuntu-7.04-beta-
alternate-powerpc.iso.  The MD5 sum checks out, so I'm certain it's a
good download, and the file size is 731MB.  All the CD media I've tried
top out at around 700MB and so Mac OS X's Disk Utility tells me the disc
doesn't have enough space.  I also tried to burn it on a ThinkPad T42
running Feisty beta (i386, of course) and it also gave me a similar
error in Nautilus.

Is there something I'm doing wrong, or is the alternate PPC boot CD
image too big?

Thanks,
Jeff

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[feisty] PowerPC beta alternate CD image too big
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98669

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 97669] [feisty] Installing from alternate install CD leaves cdrom source in apt's sources.list

2007-03-28 Thread Jeff Abbott
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apt

I installed the Feisty beta on two laptops today -- one IBM ThinkPad T42
and one HP Compaq nw8440.  I used the alternate install CD for both, in
the former's case because I wanted root on LVM, and in the latter's case
because I already had the alternate install CD burned and sitting there.
In both cases, /etc/apt/sources.list contained:

  deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 7.0.4 _Feisty Fawn_ - Beta i386 (20070322.2)]/
feisty main restricted

This meant it prompted me for the CD when I tried to use Update Manager
to update my system.

I don't know if this is intentional behavior or not, but I've installed
from the Feisty beta live CD multiple times and I don't recall having
this problem.  In both cases, I simply commented the cdrom entry out in
sources.list and Update Manager went on its merry way.

Please let me know what other information you'd like.

Thanks,
Jeff

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[feisty] Installing from alternate install CD leaves cdrom source in apt's 
sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/97669

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 23497] Re: i8042 unbind required for Keyboard/moues to be useable following suspend/resume & hibernate/resume cycle

2007-03-25 Thread Jeff Abbott
I installed the Feisty beta and was experiencing the same issue --
almost every time I resumed from sleep, my keyboard and mouse wouldn't
work.  I created the suspend and resume scripts myself and it completely
fixed the problem.  This is with my HP Compaq nw8440 laptop, so I
suspect it's something endemic to HPs.  Just adding another report of
success with this fix.

-- 
i8042 unbind required for Keyboard/moues to be useable following suspend/resume 
& hibernate/resume cycle
https://launchpad.net/bugs/23497

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs