[Bug 1896498] [NEW] Ubuntu installer failed while trying "fresh" install over existing instalation on btrfs
Public bug reported: I have a previous installation of Ubuntu 16.04. My disk has 2 GPT partitions: /dev/sda1 for /boot/efi /dev/sda2 btrfs with 2 subvolumes: @ mounted as /, @home mounted as /home. I tried a fresh install of Ubuntu 20.04.1. I selected manual partitioning and /dev/sda1 was recognized as Boot/efi. I had to select /dev/sda2 and specify "mount as" / (there is no better alternative). I proceeded and verified on a terminal that the installer detected the subvolumes just fine: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ mount | grep sda /dev/sda2 on /target type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=257,subvol=/@) /dev/sda1 on /target/boot/efi type vfat (rw,relatime,fmask=0077,dmask=0077,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro) /dev/sda2 on /target/home type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=258,subvol=/@home) The instalation went on to copy files, all seemed fine. When the step "Creating a user" was reached, the installer crashed with an unspecified error. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: ubiquity 20.04.15.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CasperVersion: 1.445.1 Date: Mon Sep 21 15:51:47 2020 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubiquity-20.04.15.2 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896498 Title: Ubuntu installer failed while trying "fresh" install over existing instalation on btrfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1896498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1550950] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-jdk-head
I'm on Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial). I just did a `apt update; apt upgrade`. ~$ apt show openjdk-9-jdk Package: openjdk-9-jdk Version: 9~b114-0ubuntu1 ... If I install this package I still get the error, so it seems the fixed version is not in the Xenial repos, yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Title: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b107-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1550950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1701793] [NEW] package linux-image-4.8.0-58-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1701310 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701310 Public bug reported: This was reported upon reboot after a recommended software upgrade. I've got a Dell Latitude E7470 and recently a BIOS (UEFI) firmware upgrade was made by the software update system (snappy?). ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: linux-image-4.8.0-58-generic (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-56.61~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-56-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.6 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jul 1 08:24:27 2017 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128 InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-08 (114 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170215.2) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.2 apt 1.2.20 SourcePackage: linux-hwe Title: package linux-image-4.8.0-58-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-hwe (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701793 Title: package linux-image-4.8.0-58-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1701793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1393469] Re: indicator-printers does not show up when printing
I'm using Ubuntu 14.04, installed from scratch, not upgrade. The only unusual setup I can think of is that my root partition is btrfs. In my case, the problem is intermittent. Some days everything seems to work as expected. When it happens, I launch the system-config-printer tool and open the printer's queue dialog. This sends the jobs to the printer. João Rodrigues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393469 Title: indicator-printers does not show up when printing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-printers/+bug/1393469/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1393469] Re: indicator-printers does not show up when printing
@ Alberto: Thanks for the suggestion. I had already done that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393469 Title: indicator-printers does not show up when printing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-printers/+bug/1393469/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1333773] Re: scanning for btrfs file systems on system startup
I have a fresh 14.04 installation. I did set up a single partition as btrfs, with 2 subvolumes for / and /home, so removing brtfs-tools is out of question. The Scanning for btrfs file systems appears early on, but stays there for some 25 seconds until the boot resumes again. The system finally boots and works fine afterwards, but the boot is definitely slow. There must be a bug causing this delay. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1333773 Title: scanning for btrfs file systems on system startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/btrfs-tools/+bug/1333773/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1164083] Re: libreoffice spams stdout with Fontconfig warning: ignoring C.UTF-8: not a valid language tag
I confirm this on a up-to-date ubuntu 14.04 amd64 server installation. My X server is running on a different machine. Running gnome-terminal gives: Fontconfig warning: ignoring C.UTF-8: not a valid language tag Maybe I could change locale settings to workaround this, but it is bug and there seems to be a fix available. $ locale LANG=C.UTF-8 LANGUAGE= LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_TIME=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 LC_PAPER=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_NAME=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_MEASUREMENT=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=pt_PT.UTF-8 LC_ALL= ** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164083 Title: libreoffice spams stdout with Fontconfig warning: ignoring C.UTF-8: not a valid language tag To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1164083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1341562] Re: indicator-printers not working on Ubuntu 14.04
I installed 14.04.1 (fresh, not an update) a week ago, and have kept it up-to-date. I have only installed a couple of packages from the standard repositories: vim, java, no fancy stuff. I configured a couple of network printers (via SMB print server), and noticed that when I print, no indicator appears. Also, the jobs won't start printing until I open the corresponding print queue in the Printers configuration application. This may be related to the fact that these printers require user authentication. Anyway, this is an inconvenience that would probably be solved if the indicator-printers applet were running properly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341562 Title: indicator-printers not working on Ubuntu 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-printers/+bug/1341562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768924] [NEW] nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed
Public bug reported: A few seconds/minutes after login in defaut unity session, the following messages start appearing in .xsession_errors: (nm-applet:1468): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed In spite of this, I notice no problems with wireless connections. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: network-manager-gnome 0.8.4~git.20110318t152954.9c4c9a0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Date: Fri Apr 22 12:12:48 2011 IfupdownConfig: auto lo iface lo inet loopback InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta amd64 (20110330) IpRoute: 192.168.1.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.8 metric 2 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000 default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlan0 proto static NetworkManager.state: [main] NetworkingEnabled=true WirelessEnabled=true WWANEnabled=true ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: network-manager-applet UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768924 Title: nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768924] Re: nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed
** Attachment added: .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768924/+attachment/2082104/+files/.xsession-errors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768924 Title: nm-applet repeatedly reports gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y = 0 dest_y + dest_height = dest-height' failed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692
I'm just reporting that the issue is still there with Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS, kernel 2.6.32-24-generic-pae. I believe this has been confirmed by others. Should I report upstream? Anyone had better luck? João -- Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692
I've installed mainline kernel linux-image-2.6.32-02063211-generic_2.6.32-02063211_i386.deb and rebooted. Tried a suspend and resume shows same symptoms as originally reported: no screen, no reaction. I've also tried kernel linux-image-2.6.34-999-generic_2.6.34-999.201005181210_i386.deb and had symptoms similar to what adline reported above: system seems to resume, but the screen shows alternating patterns of horizontal lines or random dots. Tried to switch to other consoles (Alt-F1) but the screen remained unintelligible. There is reaction to CapsLock, and I was able to use Alt-SysRq key combinations to terminate/sync/reboot. João ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing -- Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579865] [NEW] Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692
Public bug reported: After a suspend, touching a key will restart the fans and there's disk activity, but the screen remains blank and there's no reaction to key presses (CapsLock won't toggle the led). This is a fresh install of Lucid Lynx 10.04, not an upgrade. Suspend/resume has worked on this machine with several previous versions of Ubuntu. The latest I had installed was 8.04. Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/426418 could be related, but I was instructed to file a new one. João Rodrigues ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic-pae 2.6.32-22.33 Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic-pae i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: jmr1223 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'ICH6'/'Intel ICH6 with Cx20468-31 at irq 17' Mixer name : 'Conexant Cx20468-31' Components : 'AC97a:43585430' Controls : 23 Simple ctrls : 16 CheckboxSubmission: 826312aeb57622a802ee9c8d8972fdbc CheckboxSystem: 2b6b6ee4c6a1f5f02fef2009466026d8 Date: Thu May 13 10:13:11 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) Lsusb: Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: Acer, inc. Aspire 1690 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-generic-pae root=UUID=513c77d0-8648-40a0-96be-827d8979d6bd ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux dmi.bios.date: 07/26/05 dmi.bios.vendor: Acer dmi.bios.version: 3A28 dmi.board.name: Crane II dmi.board.vendor: Acer, Inc. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: , Inc. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAcer:bvr3A28:bd07/26/05:svnAcer,inc.:pnAspire1690:pvrNotApplicable:rvnAcer,Inc.:rnCraneII:rvrNotApplicable:cvn,Inc.:ct1:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Aspire 1690 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: Acer, inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid needs-upstream-testing regression-release resume suspend -- Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579865] Re: Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692
** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378152/AlsaDevices.txt ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378153/AplayDevices.txt ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378154/ArecordDevices.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378155/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378156/Card0.Amixer.values.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378157/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378158/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378159/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378160/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378161/IwConfig.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378162/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378163/PciMultimedia.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378164/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378165/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378166/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378167/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378168/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48378169/WifiSyslog.txt -- Suspend/resume fails on Acer Aspire 1692 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 426418] Re: [Acer, inc. Aspire 1690] suspend/resume failure
Filed a new bug which is probably related (a duplicate?). See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/579865 João Rodrigues -- [Acer, inc. Aspire 1690] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] [NEW] Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash On a specific type of computer, while booting, a routine check of the root filesystem started and almost immediately the screen turned black and entered a power-saving mode. If left alone for some more time (1 minute or so), the computer stops responding: pressing NumLk or CapsLk won't toggle the LEDs, Alt-SysRq comands do nothing, and even pressing the soft-off button does nothing. This is critical because the next boot (after switching off then on) will force a fsck again with the same result. While the screen is blank, if I switch to text console (e.g. with Alt-F8) soon enough, I can see the fsck and the boot process completing normally. Removing the splash boot option also allows a clean boot. This is a valid workaround. On a normal boot, whithout filesystem checks, usplash runs normally. The problem is repeatable: just 'touch /forcefsck' and reboot. I tested in 2 or 3 identical computers with the same results. This seems to be hardware related since the exact same instalation in different computers never showed this behavior. Hardware summary: ASUS P4R8L motherboard Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz Radeon 9100 IGP Dual boot configuration (Windows XP, Linux Ubuntu 9.04). The root partition being checked is a typical ext3 (/dev/sda5, fstab below). This may be related to other bugs such as: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reiserfsprogs/+bug/32398 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/67453 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/49965 but none of these reported the system locking symptom. João Rodrigues ** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
** Attachment added: fstab http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926045/fstab -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
More info follows. ** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926068/lspci-vnvn.log ** Description changed: -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
** Attachment added: menu.lst http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926086/menu.lst -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
** Attachment added: uname-a.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926089/uname-a.txt -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
** Attachment added: usplash.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40926092/usplash.conf -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538697] Re: Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem
** Description changed: Binary package hint: usplash On a specific type of computer, while booting, a routine check of the root filesystem started and almost immediately the screen turned black and entered a power-saving mode. If left alone for some more time (1 minute or so), the computer stops responding: pressing NumLk or CapsLk won't toggle the LEDs, Alt-SysRq comands do nothing, and even pressing the soft-off button does nothing. This is critical because the next boot (after switching off then on) will force a fsck again with the same result. While the screen is blank, if I switch to text console (e.g. with Alt-F8) soon enough, I can see the fsck and the boot process completing normally. Removing the splash boot option also allows a clean boot. This is a valid workaround. On a normal boot, whithout filesystem checks, usplash runs normally. The problem is repeatable: just 'touch /forcefsck' and reboot. I tested in 2 or 3 identical computers with the same results. This seems to be hardware related since the exact same instalation in different computers never showed this behavior. Hardware summary: ASUS P4R8L motherboard Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz Radeon 9100 IGP Dual boot configuration (Windows XP, Linux Ubuntu 9.04). The root partition being checked is a typical ext3 (/dev/sda5, fstab below). + This may be related to other bugs such as: + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reiserfsprogs/+bug/32398 + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/67453 + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usplash/+bug/49965 + but none of these reported the system locking symptom. + João Rodrigues -- Usplash turns off screen and locks the system while checking filesytem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 360925] Re: md5sum check of UNR image fails in one file
I confirm this bug. After mounting (as VFAT) on a ubuntu 6.06 system, the correct file appears as: ff0358bc3eb43e9420a7f009482c278a ./pool/main/p/ppp/PPP_245~.D whereas md5sum.txt contains: ff0358bc3eb43e9420a7f009482c278a ./pool/main/p/ppp/ppp_2.4.5~git20081126t100229-0ubuntu2_i386.deb João Rodrigues -- md5sum check of UNR image fails in one file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120015] useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: passwd In a machine with nsswitch configured to used a LDAP server with around 5 users, trying to add a new local user (with useradd) takes a really long time. My /etc/nsswitch.conf contains this: passwd: files ldap group: files shadow: files hosts: files dns mdns #hosts: dns [!UNAVAIL=return] files mdns #UA2006 ? networks: files protocols: db files services: db files ethers: db files rpc:db files netgroup: nis An strace shows that useradd is fetching a full list of users from the server: on my system his takes a long time. Commenting out the ldap in nsswitch immediately solves the problem. Maybe this is a feature but I can't see why adding a new user should need to verifiy every existing user. Using the command newusers, there is no problem even with LDAP activated. João Rodrigues ** Affects: shadow (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120015] Re: useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch
Forgot to say: I'm using Ubuntu 6.06 but I recall similar behavior with a Mandrake 10.1 distro a few years ago. This is probably a upstream problem. Some more info: In my current setup, ldap is only used for the passwd DB --- Kerberos is used for authentication, so there is no need for shadow DB from nsswitch. I've installed libnss-ldap, but not libpam-ldap. I tried creating users both with and without options specifying UID and GID: useradd johndoe useradd -u 1234 johndoe useradd -u 1234 -g 100 johndoe All had the same problem. (I hoped that by specifying a UID only a single lookup would be made, but strace reveals the same behavior: fetching the full DB.) Sorry for the typos in the previous comment. João Rodrigues -- useradd too slow with LDAP nsswitch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67487] Re: Install 6:10 Failure: Black screen at Live Desktop Stage
I agree with Slogger that this might be related with bug #22985. At least some of the problems mentioned here look similar, but there are some new issues, too. Bug #22985 comes from Dapper (6.06), still exists in Edgy (6.10). In Dapper, switching to a console worked fine and a fix was easy to apply. In Edgy there seem to be problems with the console, too, which should be a different problem but very much worsens the situation. I have an Acer Aspire 1692WLMi laptop (Pentium M, ATI X700 PCI-E, 1280x800 LCD) and had bug #22985 with Dapper: when X ran, LCD turned black, it seemed like the backlight was turned off. Possibly there was signal on the CRT output, but I can't recall that now. I have only tried Edgy-live once and this is what I recall: LCD turned black on X startup, just like on Dapper. Tried switching to console but it looked all garbled up... very unpleasant, but it looked like the system was running. I was eventually able to boot and switch to a sane console by specifying vga=771 boot parameter. I'll try and repeat this later. I'll confirm it here. -- Install 6:10 Failure: Black screen at Live Desktop Stage https://launchpad.net/bugs/67487 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong
This probably does not belong here, but just to let you know: With latest update of the 686 kernel (2.6.15-26.47), restricted modules (2.6.15.11-4) and proprietary ATI fglrx driver (7.0.0-8.25.18+2.6.15.11-4), I now have hardware 3D with the 686 kernel. Problem seems to be gone. -- cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong https://launchpad.net/bugs/30557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong
I confirm anonym's problems. I have an Acer aspire 1692WLmi, Pentium M740 with ATI X700 graphics. With the proprietary fglrx driver (version 8.25.18), hardware 3D is unavailable with -686 kernel (version 2.6.15-26.46) but works with -386 kernel. This can be verified by running glxinfo and checking the direct rendering: line. However, I suspect this may be a different bug, and possibly not with the kernel but with the fglrx driver or the restricted kernel module it needs. -- cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong https://launchpad.net/bugs/30557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong
Should the bug now be marked Fix released? According to the changelog on the latest (2.6.15-26.46) dapper kernel: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changel...6.46/changelog It seems to be out now. -- cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong https://launchpad.net/bugs/30557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30557] Re: cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong
I'm now running linux-image-2.6.15-26-686, version 2.6.15-26.46 on a Pentium M 740 1.73MHz (Acer Aspire 1692WLMi). So far, it seems fine: Without changing max_cstate, CPU rapidly throtles down to 800MHz and, when idle, CPU usage settles around 5--6%. Starting new apps, such as opening a firefox window, does not feel sluggish like it used to. Here is a sample of data taken some 19 minutes after booting, laptop connected to AC power, with Wi-Fi on and a USB mouse plugged in: $ cat /sys/module/processor/parameters/max_cstate 8 $ top top - 18:56:55 up 14 min, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.33, 0.27 Tasks: 103 total, 1 running, 102 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 5.3% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 94.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si ... $ cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU*/power active state:C2 max_cstate: C8 bus master activity: 04004002 states: C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000] usage[0010] *C2: type[C2] promotion[C3] demotion[C1] latency[001] usage[00356747] C3: type[C3] promotion[C4] demotion[C2] latency[085] usage[00053269] C4: type[C3] promotion[--] demotion[C3] latency[185] usage[00065042] Looks like this one is fixed. Thanks. -- cpu idle time in /proc/stat wrong https://launchpad.net/bugs/30557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30570] Re: CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 30557 *** On a Core Duo T2300 (1.6GHz), kernel -686 does not sem to have this problem. When idel, top reports tipically Cpu(s): 2.3% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.2% id, 0.0% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.0% si This seems to be the average between the 2 CPUs. System monitor shows both CPU1 and CPU2 around 2.0%. Both processors throttled down to 996 MHz. /proc/acpi/processor/CPU*/power shows both CPUs spend most time in C2. Seems fine. -- CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it https://launchpad.net/bugs/30570 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30570] Re: CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 30557 *** On a Core Duo T2300 (1.6GHz), kernel -686 does not sem to have this problem. When idel, top reports tipically Cpu(s): 2.3% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.2% id, 0.0% wa, 0.2% hi, 0.0% si This seems to be the average between the 2 CPUs. System monitor shows both CPU1 and CPU2 around 2.0%. Both processors throttled down to 996 MHz. /proc/acpi/processor/CPU*/power shows both CPUs spend most time in C2. Seems fine. -- CPU usage very high with no running tasks using it https://launchpad.net/bugs/30570 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
