[Bug 982434] Re: Opening the dash causes memory usage to climb dramatically, and never comes back down

2013-01-29 Thread Johan Persson
Hi,

I am sorry if this is a bad place for this message, but googling didn't
give me only one more suitable launchpad result and that had been maked
as a duplicate of this one. Recently my computer became very slow and
upon starting System monitor I realized that Compiz was using 5.5GiB
(Sic!) of (writable)memory, 7.7GiB of virtual memory and constantly
using 8-22% of processor power (if I read these columns correctly). As
it happens 7.7GiB is also the amount of installed memory - maybe
related?

I had probably only used open office write, evince, Thunderbird, Skype,
Jupiter (0.1.9) with a second screen, and Firefox with Youtube. My
computer had been on for a few days (ca 4 days) and been suspended
during the nights and most of the days. I have also opened the dash many
times.

I don't know if this is the same bug? I don't know if this is a memory
leak? I was not clever/awake enough to take a screenshot or copy some
log or something, but merely restarted the computer (the computer was
also too unresponsive to do much googling). I am sorry for this. But at
least this is reported somewhere on the internet now... If this happens
again I'll try to be better.

Ubuntu 12.10 64bit, Lenovo T410 (GMA) 7.7 GiB RAM (not original), Intel
core i7 M620, Nvidia NVS 3100M using driver 304.51.

/Johan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982434

Title:
  Opening the dash causes memory usage to climb dramatically, and never
  comes back down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/982434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996845] Re: Ubuntu 12.04. Time in other locations shows the time for unspecified locations .

2012-11-29 Thread Johan Persson
I think this bug is related:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/979287

Sorry for not knowing how this system works - there might be a better
way than to leave a comment?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996845

Title:
  Ubuntu 12.04. Time in other locations shows the time for unspecified
  locations .

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/996845/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 979287] Re: Can't add 'other locations' for clock in 12.04 and 12.10

2012-11-28 Thread Johan Persson
I believe I have the same issue, but with a twist? (I am sorry if this
is the wrong place for filing this - this is my first time...)

Can't add specific 'other locations' for clock in 12.10.

When trying to add Singapore, a list shows up that allows me to choose
between Singapore, South Africa and Singapore (Historical), United
States, but the obvious Singapore, Signapore does not show up.

When typing Sidney, a list shows up that allows me to choose between a
few different Sidneys, all in the USA. There would be space for the
real Sidney, but it doesn't show up.

System language: English
Keyboard layout: Swedish
Location set to: Stockholm
Ubuntu 12.10, fairly fresh install

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979287

Title:
  Can't add 'other locations' for clock in 12.04 and 12.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/979287/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222445] Re: [Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge

2008-05-01 Thread Johan Persson
The requested log files are attached

** Attachment added: var_log_dist-upgrade.zip
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14061920/var_log_dist-upgrade.zip

-- 
[Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222445
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222445] [NEW] [Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge

2008-04-26 Thread Johan Persson
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

During my upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy I was queried by the update-
manager what I wanted to do about my local menu.lst file. I selected the
option ~ diff the two versions. The update manager asked me this
twice. The first nothing seemed to happen and the second time it seemed
to have realized that something had gone wrong. In neither case was I
shown a diff of the two files.

I also got the error messages below in a dialogue:

---

Could not install 'linux-image-2.6.24-16-generic'

The upgrade will continue but the 'linux-image-2.6.24-16-generic'
package may be in a not working state. Please consider submitting a
bugreport about it.


subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr 26 07:36:07 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process 
/usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: update-manager 1:0.87.24
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: update-manager
Title: package update-manager 1:0.87.24 failed to install/upgrade: 
ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg 
returned an error code (1)
Uname: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic i686

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package

-- 
[Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222445
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222445] Re: [Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge

2008-04-26 Thread Johan Persson

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13928471/Dependencies.txt

-- 
[Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222445
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222445] Re: [Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge

2008-04-26 Thread Johan Persson
Here is some console output from the update manager.





Processing triggers for libc6 ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-16-generic
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-2.6.24-16-generic
 linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-16-generic
 linux-image-generic
 linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-16-generic
 linux-restricted-modules-generic
 linux-generic
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File logging/__init__.py, line 753, in emit
self.flush()
  File logging/__init__.py, line 731, in flush
self.stream.flush()
IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File logging/__init__.py, line 753, in emit
self.flush()
  File logging/__init__.py, line 731, in flush
self.stream.flush()
IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File logging/__init__.py, line 753, in emit
self.flush()
  File logging/__init__.py, line 731, in flush
self.stream.flush()
IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)

-- 
[Hardy] update failed after non-default option selected for menu.lst merge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222445
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs