[Bug 116984] Re: Applications can't connect to avahi-daemon until avahi is restarted once.
Same problem on ubuntu 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116984 Title: Applications can't connect to avahi-daemon until avahi is restarted once. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avahi/+bug/116984/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770232] Re: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing
There is no module rt2870sta. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770232 Title: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/770232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770232] Re: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing
I sorry but I think I’ve to correct my earlier statement. Seems it was a bit to enthusiastic. After a longer period (about an hour) of a good reliable connection the speed begins to diminish before the connection stops working completely. The only thing that seems to work is unplugging the device. After that connection works again reliable for a longer period of time until it begins to diminish again and finally stops. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770232 Title: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/770232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770232] Re: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing
I just tested the new firmware with my DWA-140 rev. B2 (07d1:3c0a). The afore mentioned regressions about download speed and connection reliability seems to be fixed now. Everything is working now. At least the last hour. But the currently reported connection speed (150Mbit/s) is less than the connection speed is reported when using the official ralinktech driver (280Mbit/s). But I didn’t actually test chose speed rates with neither one of them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770232 Title: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/770232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system
Well you can always disable the filesystem check via /etc/fstab. Just set the value in the sixth column to 0. This way fsck assumes the filesystem doesn’t need to be checked ever and fsck.btrfs will never be run. But you have to remember enable the check later on if a proper fsck.btrfs has been released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/btrfs-tools/+bug/660649/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770232] Re: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing
I’ve been using the oneiric version on of the package on my natty installation but I think the firmware version is the same. I can confirm the situation. • rt2870sta can’t connect at draft-N speed. • rt2000usb can connect at draft-N speed. • With rt2000usb the connection is extremely slow. It’s hanging often and pings can’t get through. • After disabling power saving with rt2000usb (iwconfig wlan0 power off) the connection improves a little bit but it’s still extremely slow and unreliable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770232 Title: 148f:3072 Ralink RT3072 WLAN not working with rt2800usb - firmware missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/770232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750209] Re: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot
Thanks for the hint but I already took care of that as soon as I realized what caused the massive startup delay. But I think as long as there is no working btrfsck the package should not provide a symlink to btrfsck. If there's need for /sbin/fsck.btrfs it should be symlink pointing to /bin/true instead. At least until a btrfsck is released which doesn't do a full check on clearly unmounted partitions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750209 Title: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750209] Re: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot
My partition is 800GiB and the check takes about 20 minutes. It's not that much fun. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750209 Title: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 750209] [NEW] btrfs does a full partition check on each boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: btrfs-tools Since bug #660649 has been closed btrfsck does a full filesystem check during each boot. This can cause massive delays during boot time depending on the size of the partition. Running btrfsck during startup isn't very usefull at the moment: - btrfsck does a full check even if the filesystem has been unmounted correctly. - btrfsck doesn't repair anything it just checks for errors. Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch) Release:11.04 btrfs-tools: Installed: 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.19+20100601-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750209 Title: btrfs does a full partition check on each boot -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660649] Re: fsck.btrfs not found in the system
In my case the symblink adds about 20 minutes to my boot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660649 Title: fsck.btrfs not found in the system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601299] Re: [Maverick/Natty] btrfs is extremely slow
Still the same problem with 2.6.38-7. By the way activating the dpkg option --force-unsafe-io doesn't really speed things up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601299 Title: [Maverick/Natty] btrfs is extremely slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669996] Re: Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin
You're right. Renaming or deleting the file solves the problem. After delete/renaming the file and restarting dolphin the menus show up. The file is not recreated by dolphin afterwards. Question is why was the file created in the first place. Or corrupted it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669996 Title: Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669996] Re: Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin
Desktop effects are tuned on. If I turn them off the menus are still missing. I'm using the proprietary nvidia driver. I installed kubuntu via debootstrap.The (k)ubuntu meta-packages are installed including recommends. Daily updates are installed as well. -- Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669996] [NEW] Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dolphin These two submenus are missing: View -> Additional Information View -> Panels Instead of opening a submenu just a small white triangle shows up: http://imagebin.ca/view/K_LZFPT.html http://imagebin.ca/view/wSX15_v.html Since the View -> Panels menu is missing it is completely impossible to re-enable side panels once they are closed. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.10 Release:10.10 $ apt-cache policy dolphin dolphin: Installed: 4:4.5.1-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 4:4.5.1-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 4:4.5.1-0ubuntu4 0 990 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: dolphin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Two View-> submenus are missing in dolphin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184255] Re: zsnes fails to build on amd64
still not not amd64 package in maverick -- zsnes fails to build on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373680] Re: network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan?
Still the same problem in Maverick. -- network-manager fails periodically , on backgound networks scan? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655621] [NEW] firefox recommends transitional package ubufox
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox The firefox package recommends ubufox. Ubufox is a transitional package to xul-ext-ubufox. The firefox package should recommend xul-ext-ubufox instead. lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch) Release:10.10 apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installiert: 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Kandidat:3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 Versionstabelle: *** 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 990 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox recommends transitional package ubufox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644378] [NEW] aptitude doesn't recognize preferences set in preferences.d
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude Aptitude doesn't recognize pinning preferences set in the preferences directory /etc/apt/preferences.d/ at all. "apt-cache policy" lists the preferences correctly and apt-get recognizes them as well but aptitude doesn't. Therefore aptitude will always try to pull in packages from the unstable tree regardless of their pinning priority. Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 aptitude: Installed: 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10 ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude doesn't recognize preferences set in preferences.d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583735] Re: Akonadi self-test comes up if startup takes too long
Still the same error after a fresh kde setup. The status window pops up about two minutes after login. -- Akonadi self-test comes up if startup takes too long https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583735 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdepimlibs in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429727] Re: zsh doesn't honor /etc/environment
Zsh itself is not supposed to parse the /etc/environment file. If it ubuntu policy to respect settings in /etc/environment the file should be sourced from /etc/zsh/zshenv or symlink to it. http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Files.html#SEC25 -- zsh doesn't honor /etc/environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
If you need to use gpgsm just use the fixed package I built (see post #11). As said earlier the ubuntu maintainer doesn't seem to care fixing the bug. -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
Unfortunately the maintainer continues using the unpatched gnupg 2.0.14 release in maverick. If he doesn't consider switching to gnupg 2.0.15 any time soon or at least importing this patch, ubuntu maverick will still face this bug. -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
Please report if the updated package solves the problem. If it doesn't report it too. -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
I just rebuilt the package. I tested it by adding ssh keys. I think it should work with gpgsm --import as well. But I'm not absolutely sure because I'm not a gnupg developer. The new packages are available. You should install all three packages: gnupg2, gpg-agent and gpgsm. This may be the reason you had trouble with gpgsm the last time. https://launchpad.net/~joke/+archive/bugfixes/+sourcepub/1173565 /+listing-archive-extra -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
I think that should have done the trick. I'm going to investigate if I missed something during package building. I having been adding new keys since I built the package. I added my key using a locally patched version of gnupg. I'm adding the new packages here as soon as I'm finished. -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
You need to delete the key. Then re-add the key once more. If what doesn't work I need to check if I made a mistake while apply the patch. -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571176] [NEW] Tries to install transitional package libavcodec-unstripped-52
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: k3b k3b is trying to install the package libavcodec-unstripped-52 for audio/video support. libavcodec-unstripped-52 is an transitional package with states "it can be removed safely". k3b should depend on the new package libavcodec-extra-52 instead. Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 k3b: Installed: 1.91.0~rc2-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 1.91.0~rc2-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 1.91.0~rc2-0ubuntu3 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libavcodec-extra-52: Installed: 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages ** Affects: k3b (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Tries to install transitional package libavcodec-unstripped-52 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571139] [NEW] Tries to install transitional package libavcodec-unstripped-52
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amarok Amarok is trying to install the package libavcodec-unstripped-52 for audio/video support. libavcodec-unstripped-52 is an transitional package with states "it can be removed safely". Amarok should depend on the new package libavcodec-extra-52 instead. Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 amarok: Installed: 2:2.3.0-0ubuntu4 Candidate: 2:2.3.0-0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 2:2.3.0-0ubuntu4 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libavcodec-extra-52: Installed: 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/multiverse Packages ** Affects: amarok (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Tries to install transitional package libavcodec-unstripped-52 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570601] Re: Doesn't recognize S, M keys upon mount error
mountall: Installed: 2.14 Candidate: 2.14 Version table: *** 2.14 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Doesn't recognize S, M keys upon mount error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 570601] [NEW] Doesn't recognize S, M keys upon mount error
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: plymouth Mountall reported an mount error. Plymouth displayed the partition couldn't be mounted and presented some interactive options. "An error occurred while mounting. Press S to skip mounting or M for manual recovery." Neither pressing S nor pressing M worked. The keys were not recognized at all. Other keys like ESC were recognized and tty switching was possible. After switching back to the plymouth screen pressing S or M didn't have any effect. I wasn't able to get to any prompt and had to do a hard reboot. Description: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release: 10.04 plymouth: Installed: 0.8.2-2ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.8.2-2ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.8.2-2ubuntu1 0 500 ftp://mirror.netcologne.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://ubuntu.mirror.tudos.de/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Doesn't recognize S, M keys upon mount error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
As long as no officially patched packages are released you can use mine. Only the gpg-agent package needs to be installed. https://launchpad.net/~joke/+archive/bugfixes/+sourcepub/1085501 /+listing-archive-extra https://launchpad.net/~joke/+archive/bugfixes/+files/gnupg-agent_2.0.14-1ubuntu2~joke2_i386.deb https://launchpad.net/~joke/+archive/bugfixes/+files/gnupg-agent_2.0.14-1ubuntu2~joke2_amd64.deb -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: gnupg2 + Binary package hint: gpg-agent gpg-agent version 2.0.14 has a known bug which prevents unprotection of new or changed gpg-agent passphrases. If someone tries to unlock an ssh-key which has been changed with the lucid's version of the agent (2.0.14) the pinentry program will always report a wrong passphrase and ssh will fail with "Agent admitted failure to sign using the key." https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1184 http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-April/038626.html - - A patch from upstream has been attached (http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-April/038632.html). + A patch from upstream has been attached + (http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-April/038632.html). -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
to reproduce the error (you should backup your ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file): eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon --enable-ssh-support)" ssh-keygen -C "test key" -f test_key ssh-add test_key cat test_key.pub > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys ssh localhost -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] Re: [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
** Patch added: "patch from upstream" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44880123/gnupg-2.0.14-encode-s2k.patch -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567106] [NEW] [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnupg2 gpg-agent version 2.0.14 has a known bug which prevents unprotection of new or changed gpg-agent passphrases. If someone tries to unlock an ssh-key which has been changed with the lucid's version of the agent (2.0.14) the pinentry program will always report a wrong passphrase and ssh will fail with "Agent admitted failure to sign using the key." https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1184 http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-April/038626.html A patch from upstream has been attached (http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-April/038632.html). ** Affects: gnupg2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [lucid] gpg-agent prevents unprotection of passphrases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567106 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223825] Re: aiccu init.d script will race dhclient (upstart issue?)
There are several packages which restart their service from within /etc/networks/if-up.d/. The ntpdate package or the openssh-server package. -- aiccu init.d script will race dhclient (upstart issue?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363958] Re: in intramfs dropbear starts before NIC is ready
The dropbear init-premount sript should not start configure_network in background. In "/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/dropbear" replace: configure_networking & with configure_networking This way the networking script has time to configure everything before the dropbear daemons gets started. ** Changed in: dropbear (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- in intramfs dropbear starts before NIC is ready https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363958 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295117] Re: axiom reports System error: Couldn't protect to almost all commands
Still the same problem in karmic. ** Changed in: axiom (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- axiom reports System error: Couldn't protect to almost all commands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464565] [NEW] Unable to connect to ipv6 domains
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups If trying to connect to ipv6 domains cups reports a "400 Bad Request" error. The cups daemon emits the error on both the web interface and inter client-server-connections. Trying to access via the ipv6 address directly is successful though. On an ipv6-enabled host it's easy to test. Browsing in firefox to http://[::1]:631/ the cups interface appears. Browsing to http://ip6-localhost:631/ cups reports a bad request. The domain name ip6-localhost is setup to redirect to ::1 correctly. cups version: 1.4.1-5ubuntu2 Ubuntu: 9.10 ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unable to connect to ipv6 domains https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464565 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395662] Re: kbluetooth4 fails on file transfer
Same problem using jaunty. -- kbluetooth4 fails on file transfer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395662 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode
The zsh manual says the viins mode is automatically turned on if the EDITOR environment variable contains anything linke 'vi'. http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/zsh_17.html#SEC92 The additional ubuntu keybindings cause a lot of trouble if someone exports EDITOR=vim in .zshrc and starts an other zsh instance via sudo -s oder screen. The new instance starts with viins mode and the keybindings in /etc/zsh/zshrc are activated. This doesn't affect a normal login shells since the environment most likely doesn't have the EDITOR variable set. -- package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285598] [NEW] Doesn't recognize subtitles
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mkvtoolnix Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 mkvtoolnix: Installed: 2.0.2-1.1 Candidate: 2.0.2-1.1 Version table: *** 2.0.2-1.1 0 500 ftp://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de intrepid/universe Packages 500 ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de intrepid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The intrepid release of mkvtoolnix (and the gui wrapper too) doesn't recognize any kind of subtitle (srt, ...) if i try to merge files with it. I checked several files and then same files with the hardy release and there they got merged correctly. ** Affects: mkvtoolnix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: mkvtoolnix srt subtitle -- Doesn't recognize subtitles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278842] Re: kde lacks own pam file for screensaver
strace of unlocking attempt:
stat("/etc/pam.d", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
open("/etc/pam.d/kde", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/pam.d/other", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=121, ...}) = 0
--
kde lacks own pam file for screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278842
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282148] Re: missing /etc/pam.d/kde for kde's xlock
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 278842 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278842 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace-bin Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 kdebase-workspace-bin: Installiert: 4:4.1.2-0ubuntu8 - The xlock component of KDE4 calls the kcheckpass utility to authenticate via pam. It's compiled using the server 'kde' (/etc/pam.d/kde). The kdebase-workspace-bin doesn't provide that file and pam uses the fallback /etc/pam.d/others. + The xlock component of KDE4 calls the kcheckpass utility to authenticate via pam. It's compiled using the service 'kde' (/etc/pam.d/kde). The kdebase-workspace-bin doesn't provide that file and pam uses the fallback /etc/pam.d/others. Users with a more restrictive/secure /etc/pam.d/others can't unlock the screen because pam denying the password check. -- missing /etc/pam.d/kde for kde's xlock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282148] [NEW] missing /etc/pam.d/kde for kde's xlock
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-workspace-bin Description:Ubuntu intrepid (development branch) Release:8.10 kdebase-workspace-bin: Installiert: 4:4.1.2-0ubuntu8 The xlock component of KDE4 calls the kcheckpass utility to authenticate via pam. It's compiled using the server 'kde' (/etc/pam.d/kde). The kdebase-workspace-bin doesn't provide that file and pam uses the fallback /etc/pam.d/others. Users with a more restrictive/secure /etc/pam.d/others can't unlock the screen because pam denying the password check. ** Affects: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: kde lock pam -- missing /etc/pam.d/kde for kde's xlock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278842] [NEW] kde lacks own pam file for screensaver
Public bug reported: Release: Intrepid (devel) KDE4 doesn't provide an own pam file for it's screensaver/screenlock component. Cause it's missing pam falls back to /etc/pam.d/others. If a user has a more restrictive /etc/pam.d/others than the default one (pam_deny.so) pam denies everything causing the kcheckpass component not being able to verify the password. the user can't login anymore. KDE3 and Gnome both provide such a pam file and as far as I remember there had been one as I testet KDE4 from the PPA under hardy. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: kde pam screensaver ** Summary changed: - kde lacks own provide pam file for screensaver + kde lacks own pam file for screensaver -- kde lacks own pam file for screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
