[Bug 992075] Re: Commissioning status persists with cloud-init 0.6.3-0ubuntu1
BOunce your nodes. I was stuck on this for almost a week. Your servers aren't responding to the Wake On LAN or whatever remotemethod you are trying to use to wake up the servers. After you setup your MAAS controller, you power-on your servers. If DHCP/DNS is setup right, they PXE boot and load a version of the OS that is used for Declaring the server to the MAAS controller. At that point they show up in your Nodes list as declared. You select the server and click on Accept and Commission...then they stay there, never changing. For me, this meant that the PXE command to boot to the new commissioning OS was IGNORED by my servers. I simply turned them on and voilaabout 10 minutes later, they are completely configured and Ready. Hope that helps you folks out there and you have hair leftI pulled all mine out before I figured out what I need to doh.maybe the hair was holding me up! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992075 Title: Commissioning status persists with cloud-init 0.6.3-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/992075/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 992075] Re: Commissioning status persists with cloud-init 0.6.3-0ubuntu1
BOunce your nodes. I was stuck on this for almost a week. Your servers aren't responding to the Wake On LAN or whatever remotemethod you are trying to use to wake up the servers. After you setup your MAAS controller, you power-on your servers. If DHCP/DNS is setup right, they PXE boot and load a version of the OS that is used for Declaring the server to the MAAS controller. At that point they show up in your Nodes list as declared. You select the server and click on Accept and Commission...then they stay there, never changing. For me, this meant that the PXE command to boot to the new commissioning OS was IGNORED by my servers. I simply turned them on and voilaabout 10 minutes later, they are completely configured and Ready. Hope that helps you folks out there and you have hair leftI pulled all mine out before I figured out what I need to doh.maybe the hair was holding me up! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992075 Title: Commissioning status persists with cloud-init 0.6.3-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/992075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257693] Re: Mi reproductor no reproduce la musica, ni desde la aplicacion de Rhythmbox ni desde sitios de internet
tengo instalado ubuntu 9.10 y no hay ningun tipo de sonido. -- Mi reproductor no reproduce la musica, ni desde la aplicacion de Rhythmbox ni desde sitios de internet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257693 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172317] Re: Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform
I continue to troubleshoot this issue. I decided to recompile from the repositories to see if that helped. Running Firefox this way shows (without the -safe-mode flag) Bus error (core dumped) and it does work with the -safe-mode flag. Running the precompiled version shows exactly the same error. Anyway to check where the error is? (gdb or something) -- Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172317] Re: Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform
Is the patch already in hardy? -- Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172317] Re: Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform
Thanks Alexander. Please let me know how to test it on Gutsy (using hardy repositories) As I'm still a newbie using apt -- Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172317] Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox On the SPARC platform, Firefox will stop responding almost just after being opened. I've tried it in Ubuntu and Kubuntu with the same results. Iceape and konqueror work fine. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 172317] Re: Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform
I tried running from the terminal firefox -safe-mode and started it in safe mode. That way Firefox works. So it seems to be a problem with some addon or similar. Any ideas on how to help troubleshoot further? Thanks -- Firefox freezes/crashes in SPARC Platform https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158323] Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue
Public bug reported: I decided to make a clean install of ubuntu gutsy using netboot. Setup went (as always) fine, downloaded all necessary packages and installed fine. Upon reboot I see there's no ethernet enabled. I did lspci | grep Eth :00:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal 10/100 Ethernet [hme] (rev 01) doing dmesg | grep eth shows: [ 92.800838] eth0: HAPPY MEAL (PCI/CheerIO) 10/100BaseT Ethernet 08:00:... (the rest of the MAC address) ifconfig does not show it, so I decided to run sudo ifconfig eth0 up which does make it appear, yet it seems like it's IPv6 only (not showing any IPv4 address) doing dmesg | grep eth after that shows: [ 513.824500] eth0: Link is up using internal transceiver at 100Mb/s, Full Duplex. [ 520.556981] eth0: no IPv6 roiuters present I already tried reinstalling with the same results. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158323] Re: Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue
It seems Network Manager keeps using 100% CPU before I even move any setting. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = network-manager -- Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158323] Re: Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue
Posting on ubuntuforums.org gave me the fix. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=3663262 Marc gave the following information: -- NetworkManager left my Ultra5 with Gutsy completely unusable, hogging all of it's scarce CPU ressources. With synaptic, I removed packages network-manager and network-manager-gnome. Removing Network-Manager like this is probably only quickdirty fix; I imagine that the proper solution to this problem has to do with reconfiguring/rearranging some udev or dbus/hal related scripts - but I wanted the network back on my U5 (as in: I want it now!) and that was a way to do it. In the end, I had to edit /etc/network/interfaces -- So it seems like networkmanager has some issues running on the SPARC platform -- Ultra60 SPARC Ethernet issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult
Nice solution. I will try it on my X800 to see if it works. (I only get 1024x728 and not 1280x1024) This won't work on Virtualbox since there's no restricted driver. -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult
I just got home and tried the Live CD on my AIW Radeon X800 Pro and it does detect 1024x728. Yet it doesn't detect (like my laptop) the monitor's maximum resolution of 1280x1024. And shows 1280x800 as maximum possible value. -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
On Virtualbox it detects as 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter. If you need the one from the livecd let me know. -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
Both Intel nVidia card worked without problems and detected the correct resolution (1280x800 in my case). I also tried running Virtualbox with the nVidia card under Windows XP and it also stays @ 800x600. (Both Ubuntu Kubuntu) Also (maybe worth mentioning) I'm using VT-x (my CPU supports it) under Virtualbox. (Although it happens also with VT-x turned off) I'm attaching my Virtualbox machine settings so maybe this way you can replicate the problem. ** Attachment added: Ubuntu.xml http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10065820/Ubuntu.xml -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
I looked on virtualbox forums and found this: http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?t=2290 I'm right now burning the CD to reboot on the LiveCD and check. As comment I tried to boot kubuntu liveCD on Virtualbox and got the same 800x600 maximum resolution. (had both since I've been helping out the torrents) I also have 2 video cards (The Vaio SZ is a hybrid video card system) all the testing has been done on the Integrated Intel video card, I will also try the nVidia to try to narrow down the possible scenario. -- 800x600 live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
My image file MD5 is: d2334dbba7313e9abc8c7c072d2af09c -- 800x600 live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glxinfo | grep direct direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose) OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ This is running Virtualbox 1.5.2 on the final Ubuntu live CD Gutsy 7.10 (non OSE) running over Windows XP SP2 with all security updates. Hopefully under other platforms similar activity should be available. Please let me know if you need further assistance. BTW this is running over a Vaio SZ-280p with a 1280x800 display. -- 800x600 live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult
Tormod, I want to make the point that it's not ATI's card only, as this issue happens on Virtualbox as well. Which I don't know if it uses the same driver. Originally it was not assigned to a particular package, hence I added my comments about Virtualbox, should I open another bug report, or do you think we can be talking about the same bug? -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult
Running the computer on the speed (nVidia) side: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72M [GeForce Go 7400] (rev a1) Running the computer on stamina (Intel) side: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) Hope this helps -- 800x600 resolution with ATI card on live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
I'm trying to install on a VM (Virtualbox) and exactly the same, The resolution came as 800x600 making it impossible (very difficult) unless hiding both bars. -- 800x600 live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154142] Re: 800x600 live boot makes install difficult
The actual livecd installer from what I could find. ** Changed in: espresso (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = espresso -- 800x600 live boot makes install difficult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141322] SPARC netboot kernel modules error
Public bug reported: I'm trying to install a Ultra60 using the latest netboot found here: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/distsz/gutsy/main/installer- sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/2.6/ Everything works fine until I'm asked for the mirror to use. it doesn't matter which one I choose, it downloads the Package List and sends me an error about the kernel modules being different from the ones on the boot image. So I'm stuck there being unable to continue the installation. Thanks ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- SPARC netboot kernel modules error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138911] Re: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop on gutsy (kubuntu-desktop works) on SPARC
Add package with problem ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-power-manager -- Cannot install ubuntu-desktop on gutsy (kubuntu-desktop works) on SPARC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138911] Cannot install ubuntu-desktop on gutsy (kubuntu-desktop works) on SPARC
Public bug reported: I installed Gutsy Tribe 5 on a Ultra 60 via netboot. After everything was installed, I tried to install the package ubuntu-desktop to have the GUI interface and not only console. I have this on my sources.list -- deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy main restricted universe multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-security main restricted universe multiverse -- I ran this command: sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get install ubuntu- desktop And I get the following error: -- Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requestes an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ubuntu-desktop: Depends: gnome-power-manager but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-session but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- I checked and if I try to manually install gnome-power-manager I get the following unmet dependency -- gnome-power-manager: Depends: libwnck18 (= 2.15.90) but it is not installable -- And gnome-session -- gnome-session: Depends: gnome-power-manager but it is not going to be installed -- So I think libwnck18 has an old version or maybe it's not available under SPARC. Thanks ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot install ubuntu-desktop on gutsy (kubuntu-desktop works) on SPARC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89314] Re: serial consoles not properly migrated from inittab to event.d
I checked and there's no file named ttyS0 so I checked the differences between our working Ultra 60 and the nonworking Sunblade150. I did found some differences, on the respawn. Mainly the Sunblade150 (non working) reads: respawn /sbin/getty 38400 tty1exec /sbin/getty 38400 tty1 While the Ultra 60 (working) reads: respawn exec /sbit/getty 38400 tty1 So my idea is that someway the update readded the file without checking it was already there. (as to add the exec) Finally, we have a working Sunblade150 on Feisty. All this was made using video card not console. -- serial consoles not properly migrated from inittab to event.d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97487] [apport] initramfs.conf crashed with SIGSEGV in SPARC
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools Started Ubuntu and the error report appeared automatically. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: sparc Date: Thu Mar 22 20:06:31 2007 Disassembly: 0x0: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf InterpreterPath: /lib64/ld-2.5.so Package: initramfs-tools 0.85eubuntu6 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /lib64/ld-linux.so.2 --verify /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf ProcCwd: /boot ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcMaps: 100-1026000 r-xp 08:02 620191 /lib64/ld-2.5.so 1124000-1128000 rwxp 00024000 08:02 620191 /lib64/ld-2.5.so 7feff862000-7feff88c000 rw-p 7feff862000 00:00 0 [stack] Signal: 11 SourcePackage: initramfs-tools Stacktrace: #0 0x in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () ThreadStacktrace: Uname: Linux lattementa 2.6.20-13-sparc64-smp #2 SMP Sat Mar 24 23:48:18 UTC 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux UserGroups: ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] initramfs.conf crashed with SIGSEGV in SPARC https://launchpad.net/bugs/97487 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97487] Re: [apport] initramfs.conf crashed with SIGSEGV in SPARC
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036717/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036718/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036719/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7036720/Registers.txt -- [apport] initramfs.conf crashed with SIGSEGV in SPARC https://launchpad.net/bugs/97487 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96509] Re: [apport] artsd crashed with signal 10
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/6941107/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6941108/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6941109/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6941110/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/694/Registers.txt -- [apport] artsd crashed with signal 10 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96509 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96509] [apport] artsd crashed with signal 10
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: arts Just started KDE ProblemType: Crash Architecture: sparc CrashCounter: 1 Date: Mon Mar 26 10:22:02 2007 Disassembly: 0xf7424228: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/artsd Package: libarts1c2a 1.5.6-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: sparc ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/artsd -F 10 -S 4096 -s 60 -m artsmessage -c drkonqi -l 3 -f ProcCwd: /home/menta ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 10 SourcePackage: arts Stacktrace: #0 0xf7424228 in ?? () #1 0xf74222b0 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) StacktraceTop: ?? () ?? () ThreadStacktrace: Uname: Linux lattementa 2.6.20-12-sparc64-smp #2 SMP Wed Mar 21 20:18:33 UTC 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin plugdev scanner video ** Affects: arts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [apport] artsd crashed with signal 10 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96509 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
