[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen
I reported this in 2021 (over 3 versions ago) and the bug has still not been addressed... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/1990427 I am re-reporting the bug because the original bug report was marked as expired. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655 Title: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen
this is what i expect when i want to full screen the image ** Attachment added: "tux1920full.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754426/+files/tux1920full.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655 Title: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen
this is what i get when i 'full screen' the image ** Attachment added: "tux1920sm.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754425/+files/tux1920sm.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655 Title: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056655] [NEW] Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen
Public bug reported: I am using lximage-qt 0.17.0 When I place the application in fullscreen mode small images will be displayed at their original size rather than being displayed as fullscreen While displaying a small image at a 1:1 ratio is a nice option, I would have expected an option to stretch the image to fill the 'full' area of my 'screen'. I tried the 'fit' option but that does not seem to do anything with small images, it appears to be use to shrink large images. ** Affects: lximage-qt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "tux256.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655/+attachment/5754423/+files/tux256.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655 Title: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen
This is the original image ** Attachment added: "tux256.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754424/+files/tux256.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056655 Title: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1363640] Re: Missnamed, should be 1.2
This is the version number for sdl-ttf... it has nothing to so with the base sdl package's version number. If you look at the versioning scheme for the source tarballs it become apparent https://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_ttf/release/ As far as dev packages go, there is libsdl-ttf2.0-dev which corresponds to libsdl-ttf2.0-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1363640 Title: Missnamed, should be 1.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/1363640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094112] Re: .pc file is missing in precise
Trusty now contains the .pc file ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094112 Title: .pc file is missing in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/1094112/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1363640] Re: Missnamed, should be 1.2
** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1363640 Title: Missnamed, should be 1.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/1363640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1540105] Re: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
I believe the cause of this was failure to update package list prior to performing an upgrade. I think this is also invalid as it has nothing to do with sdl-ttf2.0 package but marked as incomplete for now incase further information can be provided, or additional duplicates start pouring in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540105 Title: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/1540105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1540105] Re: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540105 Title: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/1540105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1439910] [NEW] Non-interactive mode fails at EULA
Public bug reported: When I run this shell script: #!/bin/bash export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get -y update sudo apt-get -y install wine1.7 My install still pops up asking me to accept the EULA... I realize an EULA is important, but i dont think its important enough to not work with 'export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive' I know there is a EULA associated with the fonts, and accept the terms when I set noninteractive mode ** Affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - When I run this shess script: + When I run this shell script: #!/bin/bash export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get -y update sudo apt-get -y install wine1.7 - - My install still pops up asking me to accept the EULA... I realize an EULA is important, but i dont think its important enough to not work with 'export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive' I know there is a EULA associated with the fonts, and accept the terms when I set noninteractive mode + My install still pops up asking me to accept the EULA... I realize an + EULA is important, but i dont think its important enough to not work + with 'export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive' I know there is a EULA + associated with the fonts, and accept the terms when I set + noninteractive mode -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439910 Title: Non-interactive mode fails at EULA To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1439910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1179367] Re: Customizing the live user skel
my guess is that the directory exists in your squashed filesystem by mistake. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179367 Title: Customizing the live user skel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1179367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed
This also affects the ubuntu-13.04-desktop-i386.iso -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153908 Title: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1153908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed
** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153908 Title: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1153908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed
There are a few things that need to be checked, in the initramfs we should have modules for aes cbc and or ecb (I think their built into the kernel so no modules needed) We also need to have encryptfs-utils and cryptsetup stuff in the initramfs. I have only 32 bit architecture available to me, im going to check all this out on my livecd. If someone could do the same for the 64bit livecd and report back I can really use the info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153908 Title: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1153908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166401] Re: [Kubuntu 13.04 beta 2]Monitor goes into PowerSaving mode during installation
This sounds more like the kernels built in screen save option. It can be disabled with 'setterm -powersave off -blank 0' I would write a patch for this, but in my opinion, I think its much better to destroy the users install over destroying the users monitor. Therefore I propose that this bug be marked as invalid, but I wont change it myself in case of overwhelming demand for the above mentioned patch for custom livecds. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166401 Title: [Kubuntu 13.04 beta 2]Monitor goes into PowerSaving mode during installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1166401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1179367] Re: Customizing the live user skel
I dont think this is a bug, if you look at the user-setup-apply script from raring; Line 213: if [ -x $ROOT/usr/sbin/adduser ]; then $log $chroot $ROOT adduser --disabled-password --gecos "$RET" $UIDOPT $ENCRYPT_HOME_OPT "$USER" >/dev/null || true else $log $chroot $ROOT useradd -c "$RET" -m "$USER" $UIDOPT >/dev/null || true fi both methods will copy skel, and if the directory already exists; Line 231: if [ "$HOME_EXISTED" ]; then # The user's home directory already existed before we called # adduser. This often means that a mount point under # /home/$USER was selected in (and thus created by) partman, # and the home directory may have ended up owned by root. $log $chroot $ROOT chown "$USER:$USER" "/home/$USER" >/dev/null || true fi It will simply chown it to the user. So it looks like 1 of 2 things is happening here; #1 The directory already exists and your changes to skel aren't getting copied because neither of the adduser programs will overwrite. In which case, you just need to delete the home directory from the live system. #2 The package user-setup is not installed on the live system. Test out these theories and let me know if this fixes the issue. ** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179367 Title: Customizing the live user skel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1179367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1196327] Re: package man-db 2.6.5-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
/proc is not mounted, mount it 'sudo mount -t proc none /proc' and run 'sudo apt-get install -f' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196327 Title: package man-db 2.6.5-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1196327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1196147] Re: Community wiki page RadeonDriver has some typos
I suppose the real bug lies in the exact nature of why you could not edit it yourself. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Joseph Matheney (pfifo-fast) ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196147 Title: Community wiki page RadeonDriver has some typos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1196147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780130] Re: Missing pkg-config information
It appears that prior to 2.0.10 there wasn't a .pc file included. So this bug is invalid for the current version, and obsolete for the next release. ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780130 Title: Missing pkg-config information To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/780130/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647759] Re: Update to new upstream release
I am personally trying to take over maintenance of this particular package as this Issue has been affecting me for as long as this bug report has been around. ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Joseph Matheney (pfifo-fast) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647759 Title: Update to new upstream release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/647759/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 407435] Re: virtual box crash synaptics during reinstallation
9.04 has reached EOL. ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407435 Title: virtual box crash synaptics during reinstallation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdl-ttf2.0/+bug/407435/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780131] [NEW] Missing pkg-config information
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lua5.1 I am using Ubuntu 11.04 i386 (this also happens in pre-alpha oneiric) The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/lua.pc seems to have been omitted in the *-dev package and is causing problems with building lua packages. I have recently installed lua from source and this file was included. ** Affects: lua5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780131 Title: Missing pkg-config information -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780130] [NEW] Missing pkg-config information
Public bug reported: I am using Ubuntu 11.04 i386 (this also happens in pre-alpha oneiric) The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/SDL_ttf.pc seems to have been omitted in the *-dev package and is causing problems with building SDL packages. I have recently installed SDL_ttf from source and this file was included. ** Affects: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780130 Title: Missing pkg-config information -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
