[Bug 941826] Re: dlopen(libGL.so) resolves to mesa rather than nvidia

2018-11-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
And the Qt team are now working on implementing the patch, so this
should be resolving in a forthcoming Qt release :-)  See
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71488

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941826

Title:
  dlopen(libGL.so) resolves to mesa rather than nvidia

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/941826/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 941826] Re: dlopen(libGL.so) resolves to mesa rather than nvidia

2018-11-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
I have found the source of the bug and provided a patch: see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913287

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #913287
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913287

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941826

Title:
  dlopen(libGL.so) resolves to mesa rather than nvidia

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/941826/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 502507] Re: mftrace segfaults on cmex9

2016-10-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
I tried this with version 1.2.18 of mftrace on debian and it works fine;
do you still have the problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502507

Title:
  mftrace segfaults on cmex9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mftrace/+bug/502507/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1432265] Re: does not ask for multiple LUKS passphrases without plymouth

2015-10-23 Thread Julian Gilbey
I can't even unlock both encrypted drives when using plymouth.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432265

Title:
  does not ask for multiple LUKS passphrases without plymouth

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1432265/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1432265] Re: does not ask for multiple LUKS passphrases without plymouth

2015-10-23 Thread Julian Gilbey
Oops, my bad - I got my /etc/crypttab wrong.  Fixing that allows
multiple encrypted devices with plymouth.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432265

Title:
  does not ask for multiple LUKS passphrases without plymouth

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1432265/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409005] Re: [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

2015-01-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Germar,

That's great!  Thank you!  It will do most of the work, as now the cron
job can detect whether the backup has succeeded or not.

   Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409005

Title:
  [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/409005/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409005] Re: [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

2015-01-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Germar,

It's not even the email notifications which are the core of the problem
- those can be wrapped around the backintime script.  The heart of the
problem is that when backintime fails catastrophically (no backup
created at all, for example), it still exits with a zero exit code.
This is just Bad.

In common/backintime.py, in the start_app function, we see code like:

if arg == '--backup' or arg == '-b':
take_snapshot( cfg, True )
sys.exit(0)

Instead, if it were something like:

if arg == '--backup' or arg == '-b':
ret = take_snapshot( cfg, True )
sys.exit(ret)

(or perhaps more sophisticated than this), and take_snapshot were
tweaked to return a code indicating whether the snapshot succeeded or
whether there were minor or serious errors, it would be automatic for
cron to warn that there was a failed job.

HTH!  Thanks,

   Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409005

Title:
  [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/409005/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409005] Re: [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

2014-12-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hello Germar,

I'm confused by the email notification I just received: what does
milestone none mean?

I just got bitten by this bug again: for some reason, the backintime
backup directory had ended up with wrong permissions (555 or 550, I
don't remember exactly - no idea how it happened: nothing that I'm aware
of having done), so every backup silently failed for about 3 weeks until
I happened to check.

I've now written the following crude user-callback script to work around
the problem; there is surely a better solution to this problem!

   Julian

#! /bin/bash

if [ -z $USER ]; then USER=root; fi

if [ $3 = 4 ]  # error
then
message=Backintime died with the following error information:
Profile id = $1
Profile name = $2
Error code = $4
Error message = $5

Just letting you know...

echo $message | mail -s BACKINTIME FAILED $USER
fi

if [ $3 = 2 ]  # Backup process ends - this may work!
then
dircount=$(ls -d /media/JG-BACKUP/${USER}/backintime/erdos/${USER}/1/`date 
' +%Y%m%d'`* 2/dev/null | wc -l)
if [ $dircount -eq 0 ]
then
message=WARNING: Backintime finished, but no directory appears to have 
been created:
Profile id = $1
Profile name = $2

Just letting you know...

echo $message | mail -s BACKINTIME PROBABLY FAILED $USER
else
dirs=$(ls -d -1 
/media/JG-BACKUP/${USER}/backintime/erdos/${USER}/1/`date '+%Y%m%d'`* 
2/dev/null)
message=Backintime finished, and a directory appears to have been 
created:
Profile id = $1
Profile name = $2
Directory = $dirs

Just letting you know...

echo $message | mail -s BACKINTIME finished $USER
fi
fi

exit 0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409005

Title:
  [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/409005/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-29 Thread Julian Gilbey
Great, thanks!  I'm glad that the source of the memory leak has at last
been identified, even if it will take a while to solve.

:-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
Sorry for slow reply.  Anyway, I've disabled all but one keymap (gb
altgr-intl), and ran xfce4-volumed again (after logging out and logging
in again).  I then removed the USB keyboard and did the same.  There is
still significant memory loss - logs attached.

:-(

** Attachment added: xfce4-one-keyboard.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4121448/+files/xfce4-one-keyboard.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
I have a USB keyboard plugged into the MacBook, and I have three keymaps
set up.  I don't tend to intentionally change them during the course of
the day, but I do occasionally do so inadvertently.  If you want to know
the details of the USB keyboard, comment #30 above includes the output
of hwinfo.  It sounds like you think this might well be the trigger for
the bug.

A good catch!

   Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
OK, here's the valgrind output - vanilla xfce4-volumed with keybinder
debugging on.  I see what you mean about the huge space leaks!

Julian

** Attachment added: xfce4-keybinder-tracing-REPORT.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4112359/+files/xfce4-keybinder-tracing-REPORT.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
Thanks for those patches.  Attached is a tarball with three valgrind
reports, one corresponding to each patch.

Good luck - I hope they help make sense of what's going on!

Julian

** Attachment added: xfce4-reports.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4110797/+files/xfce4-reports.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
Annoyingly, the Debian keybinder package doesn't offer a -dbg version,
so I'll have to compile one.  I doubt I'll have time tomorrow, but I'll
have a go on Wednesday, all being well.  I'll see if I can figure out
how to do so (it shouldn't be too hard, right?! famous last words...).
And you're right - the original keybinder does seem to be unmaintained -
the original site now says 404.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
I've applied the patch; here's the new output of valgrind.

Thanks!

** Attachment added: xfce4-patched-REPORT.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4108685/+files/xfce4-patched-REPORT.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
I'd be more than happy to help you debug it!  Send me patches (either
via this bug report or to my email directly) and I'll try them out.

Have a good weekend!

Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
I've tried running without pulseaudio installed, and with the vanilla
xfce4-volumed (Debian testing version - 0.1.13-3).  The results are
similarly gloomy: top by %MEM and by %CPU:

top - 10:06:08 up 10 days, 3 min,  7 users,  load average: 0.69, 0.71, 0.74
Tasks: 240 total,   1 running, 239 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s):  2.2 us,  0.2 sy,  0.0 ni, 97.3 id,  0.3 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3964008 total,  3819500 used,   144508 free, 2964 buffers
KiB Swap:  9760764 total,  4109228 used,  5651536 free.   117516 cached Mem

  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 
27169 jdg   20   0 6027996 2.389g   1232 S   0.0 63.2  46:59.97 xfce4-volu+ 
27063 jdg   20   0 1012692 429232   1288 S   0.0 10.8   7:56.93 xfsettingsd 
27121 jdg   20   0  918084 274812   1996 S   0.0  6.9   3:43.79 panel-14-m+ 
27661 jdg   20   0 1203644 207228   3716 S   0.7  5.2   7:47.82 iceweasel   

top - 10:06:34 up 10 days, 4 min,  7 users,  load average: 0.69, 0.71, 0.74
Tasks: 240 total,   2 running, 238 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 11.2 us,  3.5 sy,  0.0 ni, 85.3 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3964008 total,  3816620 used,   147388 free, 2520 buffers
KiB Swap:  9760764 total,  4108836 used,  5651928 free.   114220 cached Mem

  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 
26657 root  20   0  194076   9108   2376 R  40.2  0.2 177:26.33 Xorg
27169 jdg   20   0 6030696 2.392g   1232 S   5.0 63.3  47:01.25 xfce4-volu+ 
27584 root  20   0   76764   1884808 S   4.0  0.0 130:53.71 cups-brows+ 
27063 jdg   20   0 1013016 429556   1288 S   2.7 10.8   7:57.20 xfsettingsd 
 2900 root  20   0   84784   2736832 S   1.3  0.1   3:12.57 cupsd   

ps aux output:
jdg  27169  5.4 63.3 6034584 2511704 ? Ssl  May07  47:03 xfce4-volumed
jdg  27063  0.9 10.8 1013556 430096 ?  Ssl  May07   7:57 xfsettingsd 
--display :0.0 --sm-client-id 23a62111e-b5f0-46de-8710-5dd39d2341eb

Attached is a tarball containing the /proc/PID/maps output for these two
processes, along with the output of hwinfo.

Also interesting is that although I'm seeing this problem on this
MacBook Pro, I don't have the same issue with my PC desktop at home, so
there is certainly some hardware issue connected to this.

Thanks from a bewildered Julian!

** Attachment added: no-pulse-logs.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4107929/+files/no-pulse-logs.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
I installed the debugging libraries, and here is some valgrind output.
Enjoy!

Thanks,

Julian

** Attachment added: xfce4-dbg-REPORT.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4108216/+files/xfce4-dbg-REPORT.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Steve,

Thanks for the explanation.

I've just come back in, opened my computer and waited and waited and waited for 
it to respond ;-)
With xfce4-volumed-pulse, things are as bad as before: with top sorted by %MEM:

top - 10:36:36 up 8 days, 34 min,  5 users,  load average: 16.32, 19.37, 15.93
Tasks: 249 total,   1 running, 248 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s):  5.7 us,  1.4 sy,  0.0 ni, 24.5 id, 68.4 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3964008 total,  3874228 used,89780 free, 3040 buffers
KiB Swap:  9760764 total,  8485812 used,  1274952 free.   150392 cached Mem

  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 
10701 jdg   20   0 8702408 1.234g   1164 D   0.0 32.7  73:15.19 xfce4-volu+ 
10608 jdg   20   0 2560556 1.144g  12604 S   0.3 30.3  32:22.79 xfsettingsd 
11137 jdg   20   0 1454064 345380   9332 D   0.3  8.7  21:02.01 iceweasel   


Then ps aux shows:

USER   PID %CPU %MEMVSZ   RSS TTY  STAT START   TIME COMMAND
jdg  10701  1.0 32.3 8701956 1281372 ? Dsl  May01  73:13 
xfce4-volumed-pulse
jdg  24918  0.0  0.0 377880   792 ?Sl  Apr30   0:00 
/usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog

But top sorted by %CPU shows very little of interest:

top - 10:36:48 up 8 days, 34 min,  5 users,  load average: 14.91, 18.91, 15.83
Tasks: 248 total,   1 running, 247 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s):  2.9 us,  1.0 sy,  0.0 ni, 41.5 id, 54.6 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3964008 total,  3836104 used,   127904 free, 1748 buffers
KiB Swap:  9760764 total,  8489832 used,  1270932 free.   139944 cached Mem

  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 
30731 root  20   0   76676   1880840 S   6.6  0.0 399:25.52 cups-brows+ 
10401 root  20   0  278536  19896   5396 S   3.7  0.5 372:56.88 Xorg
18022 root  20   0   85228   3072904 S   3.0  0.1  91:17.50 cupsd   
11059 jdg   20   0  582780   9336   4248 S   1.3  0.2   0:59.45 xfce4-term+ 
10608 jdg   20   0 2560556 1.142g  12604 D   0.7 30.2  32:22.83 xfsettingsd 
   39 root  20   0   0  0  0 D   0.3  0.0  12:04.63 kswapd0 
 5204 postgres  20   0  221736   1168804 S   0.3  0.0   4:08.56 postgres
 5703 root  20   04208128108 S   0.3  0.0   0:00.29 minissdpd   
10607 jdg   20   0  535372   8720   4216 S   0.3  0.2   0:38.58 xfce4-panel 
10655 jdg   20   0  181124   3416   2416 S   0.3  0.1  10:50.06 panel-15-c+ 

Interestingly, xfsettingsd was also gobbling memory; I don't know
whether that's part of the same bug, with one causing the other, or
whether it's an unrelated bug.

Next step: back to xfce4-volumed and remove pulseaudio.

   Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Ah, could only include one attachment.  Here's the xfsettingsd one.

** Attachment added: xfsettingsd.maps.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4106420/+files/xfsettingsd.maps.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
Oops, I'd already removed the packages and logged in again.  Have now
reinstalled pulseaudio and xfce4-volumed-pulse, logged in again, and
attach the resulting maps dumps.  Shall I continue with the vanilla
xfce4-volumed without pulseaudio test?

Thanks!

** Attachment added: xfce4-volumed-pulse.maps.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+attachment/4106419/+files/xfce4-volumed-pulse.maps.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
(Oh, and if anyone else is looking for the xfce4-volumed-pulse package,
the PPA is at https://launchpad.net/~mrpouit/+archive/ppa)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
Thanks for the pointers!  I've got pulseaudio running, and the sound card (it's 
a MacBook Pro running Debian) is:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family 
High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04)
Debian doesn't currently have xfce4-volumed-pulse; I'll try the Ubuntu package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-05-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hmm, I still don't know how to figure out which backend is being used.  I've 
used xfce4-settings-editor, and the list of channels includes:
displays, keyboard-layout, keyboards, thunar, thunar-volman, 
xfce4-{desktop,keyboard-shortcuts,mixer,panel,power-manager,session,settings-editor,settings-manager},
 xfwm4, xsettings
On my Debian system, I can't find anything approximating xvd.
I'm not clear how I select the backend for xfce4-volumed{,-pulse} :(

I do know that I have pulseaudio running with xfce4-volumed on my vanilla 
xfce4-volumed:
redfield:~ $ ps aux | grep pulse
jdg   9925  0.0  0.0  10708   872 pts/2S+   14:14   0:00 grep pulse
jdg  24918  0.0  0.0 377880  3964 ?Sl  Apr30   0:00 
/usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog

But that may not necessarily mean that it's the direct backend:
xfce4-volumed is linked to libgstreamer, which has a pulseaudio backend,
so it may be that connection which is leaking memory, perhaps?

Anyway, I'm going to uninstall xfce4-volumed and replace it with xfce4
-volumed-pulse, and leave that running for a few days.  I won't be back
in my office until next Tuesday, so I won't be able to give the results
of this experiment until then.

Thanks!

Julian

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607474] Re: xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

2014-04-30 Thread Julian Gilbey
How do I determine which backend is being used?   I am also suffering
from the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607474

Title:
  xfce4-volumed using too much RAM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-volumed/+bug/607474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409005] Re: [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

2014-01-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
This is not actually adequate for the purpose, because when the backup
fails (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/1265499 ), the
process exits without calling the callback with code 4.  So I *still*
didn't get notified that the backup had failed, even though I had the
callback set up and waiting.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409005

Title:
  [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/409005/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 409005] Re: [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

2014-01-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
BTW, this means that this is not so much an enhancement request as a bug
report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409005

Title:
  [enhancement] Feature Request Email Notifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/409005/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 484186] Re: Cannot switch Monitor configuration CRTC 58

2010-02-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
I am observing the same bug with my Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop: close the
laptop, reopen it and the screen is blank.  Do Ctl-Alt-F1 and then Ctl-
Alt-F7 and I get back to my X-session, with the error message could not
set the configuration for CRTC 64.  Kernel log has:

Feb 18 14:42:53 polya kernel: [65517.943549] [drm] LVDS-8: set mode
1366x768 c

and xrandr says:

Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1366 x 768, maximum 8192 x 8192
VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 353mm x 
198mm
   1366x768   60.0*+
   1360x768   59.8  
   1024x768   85.0 75.0 70.1 60.0  
   832x62474.6  
   800x60085.1 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2  
   640x48085.0 72.8 75.0 59.9  
   720x40085.0  
   640x40085.1  
   640x35085.1  
DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

-- 
Cannot switch Monitor configuration CRTC 58
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 484186] Re: Cannot switch Monitor configuration CRTC 58

2010-02-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
I am observing the same bug with my Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop: close the
laptop, reopen it and the screen is blank.  Do Ctl-Alt-F1 and then Ctl-
Alt-F7 and I get back to my X-session, with the error message could not
set the configuration for CRTC 64.  Kernel log has:

Feb 18 14:42:53 polya kernel: [65517.943549] [drm] LVDS-8: set mode
1366x768 c

and xrandr says:

Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1366 x 768, maximum 8192 x 8192
VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 353mm x 
198mm
   1366x768   60.0*+
   1360x768   59.8  
   1024x768   85.0 75.0 70.1 60.0  
   832x62474.6  
   800x60085.1 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2  
   640x48085.0 72.8 75.0 59.9  
   720x40085.0  
   640x40085.1  
   640x35085.1  
DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

-- 
Cannot switch Monitor configuration CRTC 58
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs