[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176 If what you are saying is that you think I am putting two disks on the same system... dd'ing one to the other and then removing one after running grub updates or something, then thats wrong. The system NEVER has more than one disk attached at any one time, if you are more familiar with Clonezilla than Packer then that is an equal analogy... disk 1 from Packer is raw dumped (to network store or USB). It is later raw restored onto a system with a single disk at a later point in time. That raw restore is going to include the grub MBR, ESP, /boot/efi and root of the original disk in unmodified form except on a different disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176 * sorry I meant `grub-install /dev/sda` not sda1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176 The other ticket is talking about installing grub failing when grub is already installed on my disk, I tried to manually do `grub-install /dev/sda1` before upgrading your package and it made zero difference (not that I expected it would since thats what subiquity already did for us and its already there), and I also tried update-grub. Neither solves the problem. It sounds like you have no clue what Packer actually does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176 The ticket this one has been marked as a duplicate of also only seems to be dealing with NVME, while in my case both the original disk and the disk being migrated to are both SATA, so my issue isnt restoring the original SATA image to NVME only. Its happening on restore to both disk types. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083176 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083176 Im still not following what you are saying. Both the original system in Packer and the system being restored to are always 1 disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
I did not remove the ESP at all and I did not setup a new EFI mount. So as the last person just asked, how do we fix this manually before updating this package if you are refusing to make it acknowledge non- interactive install like other packages do (postfix does it, openssh- server does it... I can go on and on). The equivalent to what we did is literally dd'ing the image from a virtio SATA disk to an NVME, if that breaks this then clearly theres something wrong with internally maintained state somewhere. Is this in a flat file we can update, is there a command we can run. I have physical devices that have been in the field for ages that stay in the field for years at a time and I cannot simply retrieve them to reimage them in order to work around this issue in your packaging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
The ncurses prompt also mentions things becoming out of sync... how does that even happen even if we move the full disk image from one disk to another if fstab is using UUIDs for everything and when I go into Grub to modify the boot line its also using UUIDs to identify the disk partitions... this just goes back to my above question as to whats actually being updated here. The only thing that could be changing is that on Packer its /dev/vda1 and when we dd the full disk to a physical device its sda or nvme but given the consistent usage of UUIDs across fstab/grub why would that even matter? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
Can any of you actually explain what this post install script is running/updating so we can do it manually instead through scripting we write ourselves instead of just saying "setup your system our way or the highway". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
> Also this bug claims the package is ignoring the frontend variable. It is not doing that; nothing in your output shows ncurses being invoked in non interactive mode. The output was done in both interactive mode to show what the ncurses prompt shows but when done from Ansible the env var is set and causes the ncurses prompt to not show up and the result is the same as responding with ESC to the ncurses prompt causing the install to fail. > In this situation, your system is broken with respect to the bootloader, and there is no sensible way to proceed to the package being "installed" in a meaningful sense without admin intervention. Again as I said above, how is it broken if it boots, the ESP is there an unmodified from initial creation by subiquity and the same for /boot/efi and I did nothing to change the initial system install other than do a full dd of the disk from the one created by Packer onto a physical NVME. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080095] Re: Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10)
This ticket can be closed, kernel CVE fix caused the issue but it raised a userland issue that has been corrected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080095 Title: Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] Re: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
Hi Julian, you seem to be missing the point of the ticket. I never said I felt the prompt was incorrect it is correct. What is NOT correct is the post install script ignoring the DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive env var which is standard practice for Debian packages that prompt for ncurses input on install and thus true for Ubuntu as well, that when present it will automatically accept the default and answer in the affirmative (OK) to all prompts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080297] [NEW] installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32
Public bug reported: We use Packer to build Ubuntu 20.04/22.04 images for our devices and the root disk in Packer starts out as a virtio disk mounted to /dev/vda1. When we restore these images to our Intel NUC devices, they are restored to either a SATA or NVME device. These images and the devices are setup to do UEFI booting leveraging grub, however secure boot is disabled in the BIOS. When we attempt to do automated non interactive OS upgrades on these devices using Ansible for either 20.04 or 22.04, we get the following equivalent error from shim-signed packaged: $ sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up shim-signed (1.51.4+15.8-0ubuntu1) ... mount: /var/lib/grub/esp: special device /dev/vda1 does not exist. dpkg: error processing package shim-signed (--configure): installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 Errors were encountered while processing: shim-signed E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Here we show the output of running `apt-get install -f` manually and it brings up the ncurses prompt in the attached image at which point we press ESC instead of OK to mimic what is happening when Ansible runs. Ansible is running the equivalent of "sudo aptitude safe-upgrade" with the environment variable "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive" set. The shim- signed package seems to be ignoring the request for a noninteractive install and causes the upgrade to fail since we cannot send in confirmation for the ncurses prompt from Ansible. We would like to request that this package's post-install script be updated to properly adhere to noninteractive install behavior expected of most packages or provide different expected environment variables which can be set for advanced selection of answers to any prompts. Ive opened this bug ticket against 22.04 but I have confirmed the same issue exists on 20.04 as well. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: shim-signed 1.51.3+15.7-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64 .proc.sys.kernel.moksbstate_disabled: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled' ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6 Architecture: amd64 BootEFIContents: BOOTX64.CSV grub.cfg grubx64.efi mmx64.efi shimx64.efi CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Tue Sep 10 17:50:16 2024 EFIBootMgr: Error: command ['efibootmgr', '-v'] failed with exit code 2: EFI variables are not supported on this system. EFITables: Aug 26 00:44:49 transformer fstrim[8155]: /boot/efi: 945 MiB (990953472 bytes) trimmed on /dev/sda1 Sep 02 00:32:42 transformer fstrim[225707]: /boot/efi: 945 MiB (990953472 bytes) trimmed on /dev/sda1 Sep 09 00:08:43 transformer fstrim[442197]: /boot/efi: 945 MiB (990953472 bytes) trimmed on /dev/sda1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-03 (615 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220809.1) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: shim-signed UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ** Attachment added: "shim-signed ncurses prompt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297/+attachment/5815417/+files/shim-signed_prompt.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080297 Title: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/2080297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080095] Re: Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10)
Hi Philip, please see the comment the kernel developer added to the pybleno ticket I linked to above. There is a regression in the kernel as a result of changes made to fix CVE-2024-35963. What I am asking for is for this regression to be addressed and or backported to HWE 6.8 once it becomes fixed if we find that the issue is entirely kernel side. Thanks, ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-35963 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080095 Title: Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2080095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2080095] [NEW] Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10)
Public bug reported: My company uses pybleno to initialize bluetooth LE devices on our IOT devices as GATT servers. This has worked fine from 4.x kernels on Ubuntu 18.04 up to 6.5.0 on Ubuntu 22.04 for us. The Python code interfaces with the socket.c userland functions AFAICT. After upgrading from 6.5 to 6.8 kernel on Ubuntu 22.04, the kernel is now returning "[Errno 22] Invalid Argument" from the socket.c setsockopt function. I have outline as best I can what I checked in the downstream pybleno ticket here: https://github.com/Adam-Langley/pybleno/issues/63 I could use some input on whether on not any of the recent socket.c changes between 6.5 to 6.8 changes could have caused this and if this is a regression or whether not the Python calls to these socket.c functions which have worked since 4.x need to be rewritten as a result of an expected interface change on the kernel side. This problem exists for us as well when we tested with mainline 6.9 and 6.10 kernels last week and our only current solution is downgrading to 6.5 . Thanks ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3-generic 6.8.12 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.6 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Mon Sep 9 17:09:08 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-01-03 (614 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220809.1) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-6.8 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-6.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080095 Title: Initializing bluetooth using socket.c userland functions broken after upgrade from 6.5 to 6.8 (and mainline 6.9, 6.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-6.8/+bug/2080095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774780] Re: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu7: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: ‘_timer {aka struct timer_list}’ has no member named ‘data’]
Round 3 with this driver breaking on a kernel update. I found a similar
bug that was fixed in this package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4798 (wl-kmod). If you go
to the link in the second comment and download the source RPM, it
contains a timer patch for kernel 4.15 .
Still trying to figure out how to translate that patch into something
thats usable in this driver.
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/ #4798
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4798
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774780
Title:
rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu7: rtl8812au kernel
module failed to build [error: ‘_timer {aka struct timer_list}’ has no
member named ‘data’]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1774780/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1742426] Re: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘allow_signal’]
I have documented the patch needed to fix this issue in my last comment in this thread: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1637059 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742426 Title: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘allow_signal’] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1742426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1637059] Re: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_task’]
Seems this broke again with the 4.13.0 HWE kernel on 16.04 . Now, in addition to the patch I described above for CONFIG_COMPAT, you also need the following patch to /usr/src/rtl8812au-4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg/include/osdep_service_linux.h : ``` #ifndef __OSDEP_LINUX_SERVICE_H_ #define __OSDEP_LINUX_SERVICE_H_ #include #if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(4,11,0)) #include #endif #include ``` This patch includes a conditional for the kernel schedule signal headers for newer kernels. You can then follow the same steps at the end of my previous comment to recompile the driver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637059 Title: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_task’] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1637059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1662120] Re: rtl8812au 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.8.0-37.39~16.04.2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1637059 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637059 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1637059 rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_task’] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662120 Title: rtl8812au 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.8.0-37.39~16.04.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1662120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1637059] Re: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_task’]
Can confirm, I have the same issue. As a temporary fix (I couldnt find where CONFIG_COMPAT was defined in the 4.4 lts xenial kernel in 16.04.1), I added the following to the very top of /usr/src/rtl8812au-4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg/os_dep/linux/rtw_android.c : ``` # Note: This not a correct general purpose solution but for building on amd64 16.04.2 it works fine. #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT #undef CONFIG_COMPAT #endif ``` This allowed me to build the driver on amd64 16.04.2, followed by the following: ``` sudo dkms remove -m rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg --all sudo dkms install -m rtl8812au -v 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg sudo modprobe -r 8812au sudo modprobe 8812au # unplug/replug the usb device sudo systemctl restart NetworkManager ``` The driver will now work with the 4.8 HWE kernel on 16.04.2 and so far the networking in general seems far more stable than with the xenial kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637059 Title: rtl8812au-dkms 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2: rtl8812au kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_task’] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1637059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1662120] Re: rtl8812au 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.8.0-37.39~16.04.2
Can confirm, I have the same issue. As a temporary fix (I couldnt find where CONFIG_COMPAT was defined in the 4.4 lts xenial kernel in 16.04.1), I added the following to the very top of /usr/src/rtl8812au-4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg/os_dep/linux/rtw_android.c : ``` # Note: This not a correct general purpose solution but for building on amd64 16.04.2 it works fine. #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT #undef CONFIG_COMPAT #endif ``` This allowed me to build the driver on amd64 16.04.2, followed by the following: ``` sudo dkms remove -m rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg --all sudo dkms install -m rtl8812au -v 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg sudo modprobe -r 8812au sudo modprobe 8812au # unplug/replug the usb device sudo systemctl restart NetworkManager ``` The driver will now work with the 4.8 HWE kernel on 16.04.2 and so far the networking in general seems far more stable than with the xenial kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662120 Title: rtl8812au 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.8.0-37.39~16.04.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtl8812au/+bug/1662120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611570] Re: Installing 5.2 from PPA on 14.04 removes Gnome Desktop
Confirmed fixed in latest build 14 hrs ago. ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611570 Title: Installing 5.2 from PPA on 14.04 removes Gnome Desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1611570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611570] [NEW] Installing 5.2 from PPA on 14.04 removes Gnome Desktop
Public bug reported: Attempting to upgrade from 5.1 to 5.2 using PPA on Ubuntu 14.04 causes it to want to remove Gnome Desktop: Snippet from apt-get dist-upgrade: ... The following packages will be REMOVED: gnome gnome-desktop-environment libreoffice-gnome libreoffice-gtk ... ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 14.04 ppa trusty ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611570 Title: Installing 5.2 from PPA on 14.04 removes Gnome Desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1611570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573381] Re: Git-Gui fails when cloning a repository
I can confirm that this bug is fixed at least as of 1.7.3.5, maybe earlier. So add ppa:git-core/ppa and upgrade your git to the latest version and it will resolve this bug. I dont have a link to the patch that went in as I couldnt find it when I did a search on the commits. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573381 Title: Git-Gui fails when cloning a repository -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 92383] Re: wr...@lba=288830h failed with SK=7h/ASC=00h/ACQ=00h]: Input/output error
I was actually looking into this the other day because this problem was getting so annoying to me. I found one bug thread someone (dont recall the number) where one user switch the bios IDE mode from IDE to AHCI and said that after doing so they were unable to get their SATA burner to burn dual layers. It caught my attention only because I have done this to my own bios config (and i was able to burn dual layers before) but i havent had the chance to sit down and disable AHCI to see if it actually fixes the issue. The other odd thing about this dual layer issue is that at least for me, it seems to give out at around exactly the 4gb mark on every dual layer burn attempt. On 07/25/2010 04:27 PM, LEo wrote: > I guess I'm having the same problem. > I'm trying to burn a DVD+R DL on my recorder and I get this error... I guess > it happens only with dual layer midia. > My recorder: > $ cat /proc/scsi/scsi > Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 >Vendor: Optiarc Model: BD ROM BC-5500S Rev: 1.75 >Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 05 > More info goes in the log file attached. > > ** Attachment added: "brasero-session.log" > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52501547/brasero-session.log > > -- wr...@lba=288830h failed with SK=7h/ASC=00h/ACQ=00h]: Input/output error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92383 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477300] Re: libscrollkeeper0 is missing in Karmic, but glade-doc depends on it
I looked it up and it seems that the real issue is that scrollkeeper is outdated and possibly no longer being maintained. It seems as though it has been replaced by rarian, thus glade may need to be updated/repackaged to work with librarian0 if scrollkeeper is no longer going to be included -- libscrollkeeper0 is missing in Karmic, but glade-doc depends on it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
-- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157803] Re: unable to burn a DVD due to input/output errors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92383 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92383 Ok so I have upgraded the firmware on my dvd burner to eliminate that as a source of the problem and im still having the same issue. I did some further research and found discussion of the same problem on the package's mailing list: http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/2009/01/ [Thread Listing] http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/2009/01/msg00026.html [Specific Response] There was a developer there that suggested a test for the problem. I tried downloading the source but I was unable to apply all the necessary patches to the package from the repos in order to test his suggestion. One thing I noticed, but am not sure if its the problem, is the way the burning looked on the DVD+DL when it failed. Im not sure if its supposed to burn continuously from the center out in ring, but the failed dvd had huge gaps in writing where you can visible see it skipped a lot of space, went out further and started writing and repeated. So if its not supposed to leave gaps between rings then that means its most likely hitting the outer edge before its supposed to while writing, but im no expert on this, just making an educated guess. In my search for a non growisofs burning application I installed the latest Nero 3 Linux demo and although it was a bit slow it did manage to burn the DVD+DL fine so it doesnt appear to be an issue with my drive and media incompatibility. Can someone please mark this as a bug of dvd+rw-tools. ** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30075443/lspci-vvnn.log ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92383 wr...@lba=288830h failed with SK=7h/ASC=00h/ACQ=00h]: Input/output error -- unable to burn a DVD due to input/output errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157803] Re: unable to burn a DVD due to input/output errors
Ive had this problem with K3b and Brasero. It tends to happen to me more when burning dual layer dvd+r than when buring regular dvd-r for which it rarely happens. Linux sgsgthdth 2.6.28-14-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Sat Jul 25 01:19:55 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: "dmesg_and_brasero_log.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30072300/dmesg_and_brasero_log.txt -- unable to burn a DVD due to input/output errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178038] UNSUBSCRIBE DOES NOT WORK SO STOP AND READ!!!!
People come on, READ!!! It has been emailed at least 5 times that you need to login to your launchpad account to unsubscribe. You *CANT* unsubscribe by emailing the mailing list, so please stop spamming everyone with these. -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
The solution has been posted on more than once already uninstall nspluginwrapper, the 32bit Flash plugin and manually install the 64bit one available from Adobe. It is leaps and bounds more stable compared to using the 32bit plugin. Honestly I dont quite understand why so many people are adverse to taking this route as using nspluginwrapper w/ 32bit Flash was originally meant as a workaround until a 64bit plugin arrived. On another note, I dont understand why Ubuntu has not chosen to just distribute the 64bit plugin in its beta form as is. It isnt complete, still has bugs, but is better than nothing. If they were able to throw a beta Firefox on us a while ago, I dont see what their issue is with this... FYI, for those looking for it Id recommend using the second to last release of the 64bit flash plugin and not the most recent release as it is a little less stable that its predecessor: http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.d21.1.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111277] Re: Download fails on pausing the download
Im not sure who added bug Bug #303294 as a duplicate of this one but they are definitely not the same problem if you read carefully. This bug describes pausing a DL as the *problem* where as in Bug #303294 I described pausing as the solution to the problem that downloads would automatically pause/stall themselves and have to be recycled for it to complete the download. Those are not the same set of conditions to cause the problem the OP of both bugs describe, therefore Id like to request you remove it as a duplicate. -- Download fails on pausing the download https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303294] [NEW] [FF 3.0.4] Downloads hang and must be paused/resumed to continue
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-firefox When downloading files over 100mb, after a minute or two the download stalls. The progress bar stops moving, and the transfer rate stops fluctuating and remains fixed at the last rate it was downloading at. In order to resume the download I have to force resume by pausing and resuming the download. It may be related to this bug, however I havent personally experienced this problem when loading pages but it seems similar to me: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/216699 Let me know if theres anything I can do or post. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [FF 3.0.4] Downloads hang and must be paused/resumed to continue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228806] Re: [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9
@kuba, the gif extension itself is not what matters, I was merely saying that the image was a GIF image with the extension renamed. So if you download the png to your computer, then rename it to GIF, you can see the image in a picture viewer. If you dont do that then a picture viewer will most likely not display the 50,000 px image. You can prove its a gif by dumping the first bit of the binary data on the command line running: more test.png In which case the first thing you should see is the GIF identifier. I think this image may have embedded code in it that causes Firefox to crash if its not related to the actual size of the image, which I would find really difficult to believe is actually the problem here. -- [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228806] Re: [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9
Ok so I tried it with a random gif file (http://pds- rings.seti.org/saturn/images/ring_sat.gif) and renamed it to .png and tried again, locally on my pc and not through a web server. and was unable to reproduce the issue. Firefox is correctly able to load the image use the File Open dialogue as well as through an html file using the img tag. Therefore, whatever is causing that to work is due to the data of that particular image. -- [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228806] Re: [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9
Well that definitely did crash my Firefox but how is that related to this bug? I would open another thread on this issue as a new bug. If anyone else has not caught how he accomplished that yet, that photo is actually not a PNG. Its a GIF image with the extension renamed to .png. So it is a viable GIF image (50,000 px wide by 120px high) which makes it seem that whatever mechanism Firefox uses to determine what the file's real type is is currently flawed. Ill retry it again with a random GIF and see if its related to that particular image do to its size or not and post back. -- [MASTER] various unrelated crashes for firefox-3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277917] Re: Buttonpress on XBox 360 Controller as evdev input causes Xorg to crash.
I can also confirm this on Intrepid A6 x86_64. The analog pads work fine for moving the mouse, but when you press any button it causes Xorg, to crash and log you out. It will continue to crash and restart until you unplug the controller as Xorg restarts itself. -- Buttonpress on XBox 360 Controller as evdev input causes Xorg to crash. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277917] Re: Buttonpress on XBox 360 Controller as evdev input causes Xorg to crash.
I can confirm this. Using Intrepid A6 64bit. It causes your session to be terminated and brings you to a GDM login screen and continues to crash in and out until you unplug the controller as the GDM login screen returns. It happens when you press any button other than the dpads. The dpads work fine and move the mouse cursor around. -- Buttonpress on XBox 360 Controller as evdev input causes Xorg to crash. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205356] Re: compiz.real crashed with signal 7
I can confirm this in Intrepid Alpha 6 64bit. It crashed right after booting up. I went to the Sounds panel to disable some sounds, I played one sound to listen to it and then it crashed and wouldnt play another one. -- compiz.real crashed with signal 7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251910] Re: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_idle_funcs()
I can confirm on Intrepid Alpha 6 AMD64. -- gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_idle_funcs() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159263] Re: Gnome-screensaver does not stay on
I can also confirm on Intrepid Alpha 6 64bit. Im running an Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT and have the same screen saver problem. The fix of unchecking "Undirect Fullscreen Windows" worked for me. -- Gnome-screensaver does not stay on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158126] Re: Npviewer randomly freezes while surfing sites like youtube
Happening on Intrepid Alpha 6 64bit for me as well. -- Npviewer randomly freezes while surfing sites like youtube https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
*Clarification on my last post... I am not able to boot into the alpha 6 live cd, I end up at a Busybox prompt as a result of the errors. -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246269] Re: Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d
I am having this issue on my machine while using Intrepid alpha 6 64bit. I didnt have this issue while using 8.0.4.1 64bit live cd. My machine is: MSI P7N SLI-FI 750i SLI Chipset LGA775 NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT 512MB 16X PCI Express Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4GHz 1066FSB 8MB L2 Cache 64-bit 4gb PC6400 DDR2/800 Dual Channel Memory Sata II HD on Sata2 ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17741196/dmesg.txt -- Switched from vesafb to uvesafb, but uvesafb can't work without v86d https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246263] Re: Ubuntu fail to start on a Dell latitude c600
An update to the above: These are the errors that show up over and over again: aufs au_xino_do_write:238:[the process that threw the error... I/O error blah blah] aufs au_xino_write:275:[the process that threw the error... I/O error blah blah] I omitted the last half of the error as its the same over and over and I figured thats the line number of the error which is probably more important.[the process that threw the error... I/O error blah blah] -- Ubuntu fail to start on a Dell latitude c600 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246263] Re: Ubuntu fail to start on a Dell latitude c600
Hi I can confirm the above issue with my Dell Latitude C600 when running 8.04.1 live cd with no modifications to boot params. It just hangs during initial loading or gets to a brown ubuntu background and hangs there. I have just tried the Intrepid 8.10 Alpha 5 desktop live cd and was able to get to a command prompt but got no further. There are still numerous errors. -- Ubuntu fail to start on a Dell latitude c600 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
