[Bug 601299] Re: maverick btrfs slow install
I did a related benchmark on a Debian unstable system (with dpkg 1.15.8.5 and linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64) and an ext3/4 file system. Here were the results: This affects my ext3/4 filesystem (ext3 mounted with the ext4 driver, but none of the advanced ext4 features enabled) as well. Iin a cowbuilder chroot (with all of the packages pre-cached by apt-cacher- ng): # time eatmydata apt-get install –no-install-recommends openoffice.org 0 upgraded, 142 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. … real 0m57.682s user 0m37.030s sys 0m7.220s # time apt-get install –no-install-recommends openoffice.org 0 upgraded, 142 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. … real 3m17.158s user 0m37.186s sys 0m11.057s Over three times as long. So maybe you're getting a double hit with btrfs, but the first hit that dpkg is giving you on *any* filesystem is pretty bad to begin with. -- maverick btrfs slow install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410407] Re: flash does not recognise mouse clicks
Is this related to #359407 and the interface ID change in XulRunner 1.9.1? -- flash does not recognise mouse clicks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 410407] Re: flash does not recognise mouse clicks
This bug is also present in Debian as bug number 548986 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548986 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #548986 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548986 -- flash does not recognise mouse clicks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
This looks related to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549376, as I (the original reporter of that bug) am seeing the same SigBlk mask on my root sshd process. It may also be related to https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 where sshd was inheriting a bad signal mask from somewhere else. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #549376 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549376 ** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #271 https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
I'm running Debian Unstable booting with file-rc, and there are several system daemons that have screwy SigBlk masks, of which sshd is one. They are listed in the attached commands file. You can get the data for a similar report on your own machine by running the following commands (as root): grep SigBlk /proc/*/status | grep -v commands for x in $(grep SigBlk /proc/*/status | grep -v | sed -e 's@/proc/\(.*\)/status...@\1@g'); do echo -n $x:; cat /proc/$x/cmdline; echo; done commands After running this, I cleaned things up a bit in vim to better organize the report. Perhaps people experiencing this bug on Ubuntu could run a similar report? ** Attachment added: System daemons with screwy sigprocmasks on Debian Unstable http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33042949/commands -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
Bingo. The bug is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/407428 and it's already been fixed in udev. -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
This looks related to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549376, as I (the original reporter of that bug) am seeing the same SigBlk mask on my root sshd process. It may also be related to https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 where sshd was inheriting a bad signal mask from somewhere else. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #549376 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549376 ** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #271 https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
I'm running Debian Unstable booting with file-rc, and there are several system daemons that have screwy SigBlk masks, of which sshd is one. They are listed in the attached commands file. You can get the data for a similar report on your own machine by running the following commands (as root): grep SigBlk /proc/*/status | grep -v commands for x in $(grep SigBlk /proc/*/status | grep -v | sed -e 's@/proc/\(.*\)/status...@\1@g'); do echo -n $x:; cat /proc/$x/cmdline; echo; done commands After running this, I cleaned things up a bit in vim to better organize the report. Perhaps people experiencing this bug on Ubuntu could run a similar report? ** Attachment added: System daemons with screwy sigprocmasks on Debian Unstable http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33042949/commands -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412972] Re: bad signal mask of ssh sessions
Bingo. The bug is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/407428 and it's already been fixed in udev. -- bad signal mask of ssh sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 21098] Re: konqueror sometimes blocks in read() while starting up
I'm not still using Ubuntu, so I don't know. So I guess you can go ahead and close this since nobody else has indicated that they've seen this. -- konqueror sometimes blocks in read() while starting up https://launchpad.net/bugs/21098 -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
