[Bug 359323] Re: SDHC Cards do not work in Dell Mini 9 internal card slot with Linux 2.6.28
No issues on my Mini 9 with a 16GB SDHC when using kernel 2.6.28-11.38. -- SDHC Cards do not work in Dell Mini 9 internal card slot with Linux 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352288] Re: New logout-restart-shutdown dialogs aren't modal windows
If the time stays, it needs to be configurable. Personally, the modal dialogs felt much more fitting in the grand scheme of things. -- New logout-restart-shutdown dialogs aren't modal windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
It seems I've let this report run wild: The issue in this bug is EXA being damn slow on some Intel graphics chipsets. While the issue has yet to be fixed, the things being discussed here have nothing to do with it. I'm removing myself from the mailing list for the report because it no longer affects me: I've been using UXA for months with great results. -- [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314390] Re: Cursor jumps from time to time
Got some questions, because I'm having the same symptoms, but I don't believe it has anything to do with evdev: - Is the cursor jumping or the actual mouse location? For me, the hardware-rendered cursor jumps, but input goes where it's supposed to (where the mouse should have been). - Does this happen with any mouse you use? It can't possibly be a touchpad issue - I get it with my USB mice as well as my touchpad. This problem always seems to crop up after updates to the -intel driver, not -evdev or any other input driver (and it always seems to go away after another set updates to -intel, and then it comes back...) -- Cursor jumps from time to time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314390] Re: Cursor jumps from time to time
While the cursor is jumping, I too get lots of log output. Seems the issue is with the Intel driver randomly redetecting modelines - with bursts of fifty some redetections every so often. While that happens, the cursor display location jumps just because of how the driver works, and everything gets really slow. So, the root problem here is Intel driver randomly runs display mode redetections, hundreds at a time. -- Cursor jumps from time to time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314390] Re: Cursor jumps from time to time
My questions were directed at the OP. I was referring to my X log: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, which shows the same basic lines as the OP posted, only more (because my card has a lot more modes to scan, presumably). If I keep a log reader open on it, the output is quite noticeable as the scroll bar shows a massive gap after just one set of jumps. 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a2] (rev 03) -- Cursor jumps from time to time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334446] Re: Remove gnome-pilot from Ubuntu
No one really cares if you /do/ own one. The majority of users don't, and gnome-pilot should not be part of a default installation. If you do have one, good for you, if this goes through, you can reinstall it. This is a matter of very few people use this, it's not part of the standard release of Gnome, and the device it targets isn't even supported anymore: it shouldn't come by default. I'll go further and say it never should have. -- Remove gnome-pilot from Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327793] Re: Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled
The precise issue here is an assertion failure in libmetacity: (gtk-window-decorator:5737): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk-colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed (gtk-window-decorator:5737): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk-colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed (gtk-window-decorator:5737): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk-colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed (This message repeats every time a decoration redraw is attempted) -- Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310020] Re: firefox - pointer blinking when over a link
The best workaround I can find is to right click on the page. It seems to temporarily fix the flickering. If you switch tabs or change window focus you need to do it again, but if you're doing something that requires proper input handling in Firefox it may be your only option. -- firefox - pointer blinking when over a link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 310020] Re: firefox - pointer blinking when over a link
Just going to confirm that I get this on Shiretoko on my Jaunty laptop, but of course, not on my Intrepid desktop. -- firefox - pointer blinking when over a link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
Missing a few things in my last comment: don't *have* GEM support... ... which did*n't* have this problem at all... Don't know how that happened. I guess I type these in a hurry. -- [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
I will test the newest updates, which I'm installing now. I'll report back later today. -- [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance
Problem persists in newest updates; in fact, it seems to be even worse. Further, we still don't GEM support in our DRM drivers. I'd also like to report that earlier I had tested the drivers and X server from Xorg- edgers, which did have this problem at all (though it did have another big issue with pipe underruns, but that had an easy fix...) -- [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: [i945] 2.5.1 driver framerate below 10fps running the cube view in compiz
No, because I run Compiz from Git, and therefore can't file bug reports on it. I simply used it as an example of poor performance. ** Summary changed: - [i945] 2.5.1 driver framerate below 10fps running the cube view in compiz + [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel - The new 2.5.1 release of the Intel driver is horribly slow. + The new 2.5.1 release of the Intel driver gives horrible performance. Screenshot with fps marker, under compiz: http://oasis- games.com/~klange/wtf_intel251.png As seen in the screenshot, the standard cube view in Compiz runs at a headache-inducing 2 frames per second. With 2.4, the framerate was easily ten times faster. Jaunty, newest updates as of 11/27/2008, 10:00 EST. Package version: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 What I expected to happen: A frame rate of at least 10fps. - What happened instead: Slowness. Lots and lots of slowness. + What happened instead: Poor framerates in Compiz, glxgears, and my own OpenGL applications. ** Tags added: glx ** Tags removed: compiz -- [i945] 2.5.1 driver poor performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
Seems someone screwed something up in X, as there's an options that's supposed to be able to set this for me: Section DRI Mode0666 EndSection Yet still: crw-rw 1 root video 226, 0 2008-12-04 19:46 /dev/dri/card0 Thanks for the tip, I'll see if it helps. -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
And it appears to have not made any difference. -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303177] Re: Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1
@Bryce Harrington: Linking libdrm-intel... to libdrm is NOT a workaround for this! You need to install the package libdrm-intel1. -- Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303177] Re: Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel Surprised this wasn't reported over the past night, but anyway, fairly simple: The driver will crash X when it can't find libdrm-intel1.so or something to that effect. I've heard reports that Bulletproof X will eventually force you into the vesa driver, but I never went that far. Checked the logs, installed the package, all was well. Jaunty, newest updates. Package version: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 What I expected to happen: Installing xserver-xorg-video-intel version 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 would bring in all required dependencies, including libdrm-intel1 What actually happened: It didn't, the driver failed to work, and I had to manually install it. - [workaround] + [fix] sudo apt-get install libdrm-intel1 - sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart -- Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
All of my Xorg customizations should improve performance (and they do, but not enough). ** Attachment added: xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20152020/xorg_conf_dump -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20152044/xorg_log_dump -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
** Attachment added: lspci -vvnn http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20152224/lspci_dump -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303177] Re: Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1
@Bastiaan Wakkie: Install the package `libdrm-intel1` -- Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303177] Re: Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1
Your problems are due to a different issue. This is not a catch-all bug for Intel hardware. -- Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] Re: 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
Had to do that just to get the driver working in the first place, so no, it doesn't help. Forgot that I was also going to report the unmarked dependency... -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303177] [NEW] Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel Surprised this wasn't reported over the past night, but anyway, fairly simple: The driver will crash X when it can't find libdrm-intel1.so or something to that effect. I've heard reports that Bulletproof X will eventually force you into the vesa driver, but I never went that far. Checked the logs, installed the package, all was well. Jaunty, newest updates. Package version: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 What I expected to happen: Installing xserver-xorg-video-intel version 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 would bring in all required dependencies, including libdrm-intel1 What actually happened: It didn't, the driver failed to work, and I had to manually install it. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intel driver 2.5.1 has unmarked dependency on libdrm-intel1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303011] [NEW] 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel The new 2.5.1 release of the Intel driver is horribly slow. Screenshot with fps marker, under compiz: http://oasis- games.com/~klange/wtf_intel251.png As seen in the screenshot, the standard cube view in Compiz runs at a headache-inducing 2 frames per second. With 2.4, the framerate was easily ten times faster. Jaunty, newest updates as of 11/27/2008, 10:00 EST. Package version: 2.5.1-1ubuntu1 What I expected to happen: A frame rate of at least 10fps. What happened instead: Slowness. Lots and lots of slowness. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 2.5.1 driver release is outrageously slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303011 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301905] [NEW] git-core in Jaunty does not include git-* commands
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: git-core On Jaunty, I'm not finding the git-* commands: [klange acerlaptop 11/24 7:55] ~$ sudo apt-get install git-core [sudo] password for klange: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done git-core is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. [klange acerlaptop 11/24 7:55] ~$ git-[tab][tab] git-receive-packgit-upload-archive git-shell git-upload-pack [klange acerlaptop 11/24 8:00] /usr/bin$ ls | grep git git git-receive-pack git-shell git-upload-archive git-upload-pack sgitopnm This definitely causes a problem when I have this in a script: if [ -z $(which git-clone) ]; then echo You must have GIT installed to use this script. Install the git-core $ exit 1; fi This is on Jaunty, fully updated, i386, git-core 1:1.6.0.4-1ubuntu1. ** Affects: git-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- git-core in Jaunty does not include git-* commands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275217] [NEW] libnss3-1d and libnss3-dev can not be upgraded
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libnss3-1d In Intrepid, there are newer versions of these two packages available, but they can not be installed because they are dependent on new versions of other packages which not been updated in the repos yet. libnss3-1d: Depends: libnspr4-0d (=4.7.1+1.9-0ubuntu5~) but 4.7.1+1.9-0ubuntu4 is to be installed libnss3-dev: Depends: libnss3-1d (=3.12.1~rc2) but 3.12.1~rc1-0ubuntu1~fta1 is to be installed The new version for both packages is 3.12.1~rc2-0ubuntu1~fta1 (the current installed version is rc1) Intrepid, i386 ** Affects: nss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libnss3-1d and libnss3-dev can not be upgraded https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251809] Re: scrollbar has some problem with multiple tabs
This problem still exists after GNOME 2.24 was released. That's really poor. -- scrollbar has some problem with multiple tabs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272632] [NEW] Pidgin freezes sporadically in Intrepid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin After a recent update of the Pidgin 2.5.1 package in Intrepid, I'm finding my client will sporadically freezes for a few seconds, and then come back. When left running, it will sometimes crash (ie, overnight). Intrepid pidgin 1:2.5.1-0ubuntu1 I'd normally expect it to not freeze randomly. But it did anyway. ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Pidgin freezes sporadically in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270404] Re: Please update VLC to 0.9.2
+1 for the exception. This is a /major/ release of VLC, it's not just something we can wait until 9.04 for, and we're not even in beta yet. Feature-freeze smeature-freeze, this is VLC 0.9.2! -- Please update VLC to 0.9.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256618] [NEW] New Strut Behavior on Auto-Hide Panels (upstream) is Undesirable for Users (and annoying)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel (reported upstream by someone else here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546835) The new strut behavior for auto-hiding panels causes the available desktop space to update as they animate, squishing full screen windows as the panel appears. DO NOT WANT. This is annoying, undesired, and impossible to turn off without recompiling. The behavior was added to fix a bug that doesn't exist such that it does not present itself in the top 90% of usage scenarios and is a tough luck deal for those who may actually see it (has to do with setting auto-hide size 1/2 the panel size, which clearly defeats the purpose of the auto-hide). The request here is to either ignore this change from upstream and add in the two-line exception for auto-hide panels, or to add an option available through gconf to disable/enable this change. gnome-panel: 2.23.6 Ubuntu Intrepid Steps to reproduce: - Set a panel to auto-hide - Full screen a window - Show the panel Expected results: - Nothing happens to the full screen window, as it's been for the past 8+ years. Actual results: - My entire machine slows down as Firefox is forced to re-render all of its contents thirty different times as the panel resizes it during its animation phase. Compiz also makes it jump in strange ways (and we're not going to fix it). So, in conclusion, DO NOT WANT, please, Ubuntu packagers, ignore this horrible commit from upstream! ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- New Strut Behavior on Auto-Hide Panels (upstream) is Undesirable for Users (and annoying) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256142] Re: Flickering with version 2.4.0
While this does seem to often be happening when starting a new application window, I've seen it happen at random while just using Firefox. -- Flickering with version 2.4.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256618] Re: New Strut Behavior on Auto-Hide Panels (upstream) is Undesirable for Users (and annoying)
In response to Dylan McCall, should the animation behavior be changed, there is a slim (but possible) chance that I would accept this. Probably not, but it's a start. It seems like the following should be done: 1. Add an option to gconf, bool, 'update_autohide_strut', default = disabled (because users don't like change forced upon them as default values, this is a known fact of creating a new release) 2. Change current behavior to update after animation cycle. (which would improve performance when the option is enabled) 3. Add in original exception when gconf option is disabled. (because that's the entire point of this bug report) 4. ...? 5. Profit. On another note, the last bit of my original report is a simple joke, and no hard feelings are meant towards Vincent Untz for what he did, even if I am a bit ticked off about it. It's not like this is a closed- source app I'm forced to use - I can go and 'fix' it for myself, just as I did. I also have a forum topic running for any less-pertinent discussion of the bug: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=885625 -- New Strut Behavior on Auto-Hide Panels (upstream) is Undesirable for Users (and annoying) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219685] Re: package update-manager 1:0.81.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Couldn't configure pre-depend audacious-plugins for audacious-plugins-extra,
Im seem to be having the same issue. I was looking around to see if there was something I missed in the synaptic pakage manger after i tried to perform the upgrade but i must not be looking hard enough. was trying to update Ubuntu Studio 7.10 to the latest distro release 8.04. attached is my dist-upgrade files - Thanks in advance for any help. ** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13952123/main.log -- package update-manager 1:0.81.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Couldn't configure pre-depend audacious-plugins for audacious-plugins-extra, probably a dependency cycle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
