[Bug 137872] Re: please add support for ext4
Kernel 2.6.28 will have ext4 marked as stable (renamed from ext4dev->ext4, and the experimental note in config removed) -- please add support for ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70107] Re: after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271540] [NEW] Kubuntu website shipit link points to wrong shipit site
Public bug reported: the text "Request free cd" on http://www.kubuntu.org/getkubuntu points to the Ubuntu shipit site (https://shipit.ubuntu.com/) instead of the Kubuntu shipit site (https://shipit.kubuntu.org/) . ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kubuntu website shipit link points to wrong shipit site https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137872] Re: please add support for ext4 in gparted
I'd like to see qtparted have this too, (and a few other things) ** Also affects: qtparted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please add support for ext4 in gparted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186097] Re: awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl
duh i forgot pbuilder only works if its missing a bdep. well, just add these packages as deps now. -- awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186097] Re: awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl
I think SOMEONE should have tested this thing in pbuilder before it was added because it would most likely fail (i don't have one setup to put it through to test). -- awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186097] Re: awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl
oh, and needs the gnome menu thing installed to add a launcher. "Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnLauncher.py", line 213, in add process = subprocess.Popen(['gnome-desktop-item-edit', file_path], env=os.environ) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/subprocess.py", line 593, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/subprocess.py", line 1135, in _execute_child raise child_exception OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory" -- awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186097] [NEW] awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: awn-manager On hardy (updated today) installing awn-manager did not pull in said dependencies (python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl) so, when i attempted to run without either of them it failed to start, saying could not find module named glade, then after i installed python-glade2 it failed to start saying " File "/usr/bin/awn-manager", line 200, in awnmanager = AwnManager() File "/usr/bin/awn-manager", line 95, in __init__ self.appletManager = awnApplet(self.wTree) File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnApplet.py", line 76, in __init__ self.make_model() File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnApplet.py", line 352, in make_model self.refresh_tree (applets) File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnApplet.py", line 416, in refresh_tree icon, text = self.make_row(path) File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnApplet.py", line 361, in make_row return self.make_icon (item.get_string(gnomedesktop.KEY_ICON)), text File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-manager/awnApplet.py", line 381, in make_icon icon = gtk.gdk.pixbuf_new_from_file_at_size (name, 32, 32) gobject.GError: Unrecognized image file format" after installing libimage-librsvg-perl it starts and works fine. ** Affects: avant-window-navigator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- awn-manager should depend on python-glade2 and libimage-librsvg-perl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
as for the not working on konqueror issue, using Kmplayer to embed it works fine for me (not using Ubuntu packages though, as they for some reason don't have the needed backend compiled in) . see http://mikearthur.co.uk/?p=171#comment-3573 for a step by step guide . But I don't think there is any way to impliment that as a .deb solution. Well, perhaps a package like konqueror-flashfix, that konqueror will depend on. -- flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
knpplayer doesn't seem to be included in our packages -- flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
found this short howto on how to get Konqueror working with the latest fiash. "Konqueror with latest Adobe Flash HOWTO Sunday 30th December, 2007 @ 4:36 pm I agree with Lubos. Flash sucks. However, most of us have or want to use it for things like YouTube or watching badgers. As you may be aware the latest versions of Flash depend on XEmbed support which Konqueror lacks without various patches to KDELibs and KDEBase which haven’t been applied by my distribution and I couldn’t get working even when I manually patched the necessary parts of KDE myself. I was using the older versions but it appears they have outstanding and actively exploited security holes that they have only fixed in the XEmbed-supporting versions. Mike needs his YouTube fix without haxors running rife on his box. Who can save him? KMPlayer to the rescue! KMPlayer is my media player of choice as it allows you to trivially switch between XINE, MPlayer and GStreamer backends and, as of version 0.10.0, has a nifty backend that allows you to use XEmbed-supporting plugins, including Adobe’s Flash plugin, which can then be embedded in Konqueror to allow Flash to work trivially. HOWTO: Install KMPlayer. It is included in all the major distributions I’ve ever used. Ensure it is installed/compiled with the “NPP” backend enabled which allows the playback of Netscape XEmbed plugins Run KMPlayer so it creates its config file. Close it. (This step probably isn’t necessary but it won’t do any harm) Open “~/.kde/share/config/kmplayerrc” in a text editor of your choice. Add the following to the end of the file: [application/x-shockwave-flash] player=npp plugin=/opt/netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so Change the “plugin=” line depending on where the Adobe Flash plugin was installed on your distribution. The above example is where it is installed on Gentoo. (If people could reply with the location of it on their distribution that would be great, thanks!). Open Konqueror and click “Settings > Configure Konqueror…”. In the new window navigate to “File Associations” in the left-hand panel and select “application/x-shockwave-flash“. Click the “Embedding” tab and click “Add..“. Select “Embedded MPlayer for KDE” from the new window. If it is not there then you may need to restart KDE or run “kbuildsycoca” from a terminal. Close all the opened windows. Enjoy a working Flash in Konqueror! What is wrong? You’re running a x86_64 machine (like me) so the above doesn’t work? Never fear! If you manage to get a 32-bit version of “knpplayer” (the small program that runs the plugins) and install that in your $PATH before the 64-bit version then it will all just work like magic! Note that you’ll need 32-bit versions of the various dependent libraries also (it seems just to be GTK, Cairo, X11 and DBus stuff). " from a blog bost by mike arthur - http://mikearthur.co.uk/index.php/?p=171 -- flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70107] Re: after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init
If nobody objects, in about 12 hours I will mark this bug invalid. I have installed a few times with windows and a windows recovery partation before my linux partations with Ubuntu at the end of the list. -- after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70107] Re: after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init
I think you just had a bad burn/corrupted download, has anyone been able to reproduce this? -- after install os,boot can't find /sbin/init https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34747] Re: kickstart too short timeouts, too little retries
ok, sorry, this seemed like an abandoned bug, you never know with bugs that go 2 years without a comment. Have you tried any newer releases, like fiesty or gutsy to see if they have changed the amount of retries and timeouts? I'm very inframiller with network installs ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- kickstart too short timeouts, too little retries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68286] Re: [Edgy RC] 20061025.1 Kubuntu i386 failed to create a user if you forget to format the partition and go back
as Caroline has failed to report resaults and her attempt to reproduce failed and edgy RC is very outdated, marking invalid ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- [Edgy RC] 20061025.1 Kubuntu i386 failed to create a user if you forget to format the partition and go back https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68286 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68499] Re: Kubuntu Edgy alternate install CD gets confused with multiple CD-ROM drives
edgy is outdated by 2 releases now, is this bug still relevant? marking invalid and subscribing my self by email of any new comments ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- Kubuntu Edgy alternate install CD gets confused with multiple CD-ROM drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68112] Re: Corrupt libssl package on Kubuntu AMD64 DVD text install
bad image im guessing -- Corrupt libssl package on Kubuntu AMD64 DVD text install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68112] Re: Corrupt libssl package on Kubuntu AMD64 DVD text install
as it works for someone else, marking invalid ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Corrupt libssl package on Kubuntu AMD64 DVD text install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 54496] Re: edgy installer give me fd0 as a install choice
Is this still relevant for Gutsy (or Hardy alphas)? any tests? My computer has no floppy drive. -- edgy installer give me fd0 as a install choice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
server has wierd quirk that makes it unusable, gave up. someone can take over if they want ** Changed in: tightvnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Kyle Elbert (g2g591) => (unassigned) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34747] Re: kickstart too short timeouts, too little retries
so have you retried with a newer version? marking as invaild for now ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kyle Elbert (g2g591) Status: New => Invalid -- kickstart too short timeouts, too little retries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 38908] Re: kernel panic on boot
rather old and TheCliftser never gave more details ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kyle Elbert (g2g591) -- kernel panic on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 35548] Re: dapper pre5 amd64 should warn about /boot on lvm
is this still relevant? I don't have any non live isos or cds around to test this with? I don't like old bugs .. especially bug # 1. -- dapper pre5 amd64 should warn about /boot on lvm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 36841] Re: Boot screen help of CD not up-to-date
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34190 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34190 I do think this is a duplicate, marked as such, also has someone looked on their cd to see if this is still relevant? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 34190 live cd "boot methods" out of date -- Boot screen help of CD not up-to-date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34190] Re: live cd "boot methods" out of date
anyone looked recently to see if this is still the case, I don't care for old bugs -- live cd "boot methods" out of date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 14722] Re: .txt files on DVD are misleading and incomplete
Is the issue here still relevant? or should this bug be closed? one less open bug for Ubuntu. -- .txt files on DVD are misleading and incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177917] Re: 64bits libs installed on i386 systems
at least I do actually have a 64 bit processor in case those libraries ever get called -- 64bits libs installed on i386 systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177917] Re: 64bits libs installed on i386 systems
confirmed, "Dependencies: 4.2.2-4ubuntu2 - gcc-4.2-base (5 4.2.2-4ubuntu2) lib64gcc1 (2 1:4.1.1-21) libc6 (2 2.7-1) scim (3 1.4.2-1) Provides: 4.2.2-4ubuntu2 - " ** Changed in: gcc-4.2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- 64bits libs installed on i386 systems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157661] Re: package slocate 3.1-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
same error here. oh and also upgrading to Hardy on Kubuntu adept fails with a command not found error after downloading the updater after pushing the button in adept. -- package slocate 3.1-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157661 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174898] libqt3-mt version screwed up
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libqt3-mt I deceided to triboot with Debian unstable and I decided to go and grab the kde-systemsettings package from ubuntu because I happen to like it better than kcontrol. Turns out I can't install because someone decided to messup the version number of this package. "The following packages have unmet dependencies: kde-systemsettings: Depends: libqt3-mt (>= 3:3.3.8really3.3.7) but 3:3.3.7-9 is to be installed E: Broken packages" so why hasn't this been caught and fixed, its the same version even in the hardy repos. ** Affects: qt-x11-free (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libqt3-mt version screwed up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
test debs are now on my ppa, to access them just visit https://edge.launchpad.net/~g2g591/+archive -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
upload details @ http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=453 . hope this makes it into Gutsy backports -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
** Changed in: tightvnc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
** Changed in: tightvnc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
uploaded to REVU -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117891] Re: Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9
hope you guys don't mind ** Changed in: tightvnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Kyle Elbert (g2g591) -- Update tightvnc to version 1.3.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
