[Bug 11242] Re: Using nano as root sometimes changes permission on user's .nano_history file, causes an annoying message to appear when launching nano as user
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58002 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 58002 Some programs create root-owned files in user $HOME when run under sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/11242 Title: Using nano as root sometimes changes permission on user's .nano_history file, causes an annoying message to appear when launching nano as user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/11242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58002] Re: Some programs create root-owned files in user $HOME when run under sudo
any reason why setting always_set_home in /etc/sudoers is not a solution to this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58002 Title: Some programs create root-owned files in user $HOME when run under sudo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/58002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188534] Re: [hardy] nano Error reading ~/.nano_history: Permission denied
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58002 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 72995 Need better way of handling permissions with nano and sudo mix ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 58002 Some programs create root-owned files in user $HOME when run under sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188534 Title: [hardy] nano Error reading ~/.nano_history: Permission denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/188534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72995] Re: Need better way of handling permissions with nano and sudo mix
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58002 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 58002 Some programs create root-owned files in user $HOME when run under sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72995 Title: Need better way of handling permissions with nano and sudo mix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/72995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 606195] Re: manpage confused about mail_badpass vs always_set_home
upstream bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542086 any chance this will be backported to ubuntu lucid? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #542086 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542086 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606195 Title: manpage confused about mail_badpass vs always_set_home To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/606195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67141] Re: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75031 GREP_OPTIONS is evil -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67141 Title: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/67141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67141] Re: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 75031 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75031 I do not understand why this is marked as duplicate of bug #75031. bug #75031 is about the mysql init.d script choking on a poorly set GREP_OPTION. bug #67141 (this bug) is about a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default. if ubuntu has no interest in setting up a system-wide policy then mark this bug as WONTFIX. marking this as duplicate makes no sense. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67141 Title: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/67141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273490] Re: Totem-plugin-viewer shows visual effects even disabled.
I do not understand why gnome-bugs #542491 is marked as fixed. They "fixed" the bug by having the plugin disable visual effects if the widget size is under 150 pixels. It is sensible to disable visual effects for a widget under 150 pixels, but it does not fix the bug when there still is no option to disable visual effects at will. I think this bug should be reopened. Here, as well as in gnome-bugs. Workaround is to right click and select "open in movieplayer". Alternatively, if the totem plugin is playing "full-screen" in the browser, then you can resize the browser to under 150 pixels tall, the width seems to have no effect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273490 Title: Totem-plugin-viewer shows visual effects even disabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/totem/+bug/273490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 434104] Re: gedit overwrites screen for long line lengths
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 26439 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26439 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 127731 [gutsy] Configuring VPN connections failing ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 26439 Editors crash scrolling file with long lines * You can subscribe to bug 26439 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/26439/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434104 Title: gedit overwrites screen for long line lengths -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346289] Re: MASTER: Choppy Flash playback in full screen
edit war FTW! see bug #540665 for my suggestion how to fix the problem of changing the original description. -- MASTER: Choppy Flash playback in full screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 18574] Re: /etc/environment lacks man page.
still in lucid $ dpkg -S /etc/environment dpkg: /etc/environment not found. $ man environment No manual entry for environment -- /etc/environment lacks man page. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18574 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589496] Re: bash --rcfile does not behave as documented
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- bash --rcfile does not behave as documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622066] Re: glob .* should expand to every file beginning with . but should leave out . and ..
just for completeness: the pattern .??* will not include files which begin with a dot followed by a single letter. a pattern to include such files is, as far as i know, quite complex. -- glob .* should expand to every file beginning with . but should leave out . and .. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622066] [NEW] glob .* should expand to every file beginning with . but should leave out . and ..
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash the glob * expands to everything which does not begins with a dot the glob .* expands to everything beginning with a dot, including . and .. i think it is safe to say that in 99% of the cases, when someone uses the glob .* they want to have every hidden file and directory but not . and .. rm -rf * #deletes everything but leaves hidden files and directories rm -rf * .* #dangerous! also deletes everything from upper directory that is why i think glob .* should expand to every file beginning with . but should leave out . and .. by default. workaround: export GLOBIGNORE=.:.. setting GLOBIGNORE will automatically enable dotglob, which might not be what you want. if that is the case then you must disable dotglob again. shopt -u dotglob this will cause * to expand to every file and directory but not hidden files and directories and .* will expand to every hidden file and directory but not . and .. using ubuntu lucid bash version 4.1-2ubuntu3 ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- glob .* should expand to every file beginning with . but should leave out . and .. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622066 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 621093] [NEW] gnome-terminal manpage does not explain role
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal this is what the manpage says about role --role=ROLE Set the role for the last-specified window; applies to only one window; can be specified once for each window you create from the command line. this explanation is useless. it does not explain what roles are available or what the effect of a role is. using ubuntu lucid gnome-terminal Version: 2.29.6-0ubuntu5 ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-terminal manpage does not explain role https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619010] [NEW] feature request: commands to easily manipulate $PATH
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bash
adding directories to $PATH is a very common task. it is desirable to
only add a directory to $PATH if it is not already there. sadly that is
quite hard to do. removing directories from $PATH is not as common but
at least as hard.
i think bash should have commands to add directories uniquely to $PATH
and remove from $PATH
for example:
path_append () { path_remove $1; export PATH="$PATH:$1"; }
path_prepend () { path_remove $1; export PATH="$1:$PATH"; }
path_remove () { export PATH=`echo -n $PATH | awk -v RS=: -v ORS=: '$0 !=
"'$1'"' | sed 's/:$//'`; }
from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/370047/what-is-the-most-elegant-
way-to-remove-a-path-from-the-path-variable-in-bash
it would be better if the commands do not depend on anything outside of
bash
** Affects: bash (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
feature request: commands to easily manipulate $PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 425286] Re: feature request $UNEXPANDED_COMMANDLINE
changed the title to better reflect the feature request. i agree that stupid rm typos can be disastrous. if it can be done well i might also accept such filtering. but i doubt that it can be done in way that it is really "smart". tools trying to be smarter than the user, when they are not, usually annoy the hell out of me. that said, i would really like to have a $UNEXPANDED_COMMANDLINE ** Summary changed: - "rm * .o" deletes all files + feature request $UNEXPANDED_COMMANDLINE -- feature request $UNEXPANDED_COMMANDLINE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425286 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435488] Re: scrollwheel should scroll not zoom
** Changed in: eog (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Opinion -- scrollwheel should scroll not zoom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596020] [NEW] feature request: "disengaged" or "full-speed" level
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thinkfan thinkfan.conf should allow "disengaged" or "full-speed" as level. as far as i understand thinkfan.conf only allows level 1 to 7 (at least in thinkpad mode). basically it should allow everything which is allowed as level in /proc/acpi/ibm/fan (although putting "auto" in thinkfan.conf kind of defeats the purpose). $ cat /proc/acpi/ibm/fan status: disabled speed: 0 level: 0 commands: level ( is 0-7, auto, disengaged, full-speed) commands: enable, disable commands: watchdog ( is 0 (off), 1-120 (seconds)) commands: speed ( is 0-65535) using ubuntu lucid with thinkfan 0.6.6-1 ** Affects: thinkfan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- feature request: "disengaged" or "full-speed" level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585941] Re: Brasero can't copy CDs or create images from them (Ubuntu 10.04)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529696 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 529696 brasero can't copy audio cd (useless error message) -- Brasero can't copy CDs or create images from them (Ubuntu 10.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581896] Re: Brasero claims for "ghost" missing apps and libs
is this duplicate of bug #529696 ? -- Brasero claims for "ghost" missing apps and libs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585941] Re: Brasero can't copy CDs or create images from them (Ubuntu 10.04)
is this duplicate of bug #529696 ? -- Brasero can't copy CDs or create images from them (Ubuntu 10.04) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585941 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588036] Re: firefox fills disk in .xsession-errors
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 401823 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401823 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 401823 Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead -- firefox fills disk in .xsession-errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318678] Re: BASH_SOURCE is not correct
yes you are absolutely right. now that i read the text for BASH_LINENO i see that the text for BASH_SOURCE (and BASH_LINENO) is quite vague. thank you for your effort to describe this so clearly. i agree with you that the wording in the manual should be updated. i now also agree with your point in your original bug description that BASH_SOURCE should show the filename from where the function is called so that it is consistent with BASH_LINENO. now about this bug: i am sure that the actual behaviour of BASH_SOURCE will NEVER be changed, because that would break many many scripts out there. so i suggest that we keep this bug invalid and you open a new bug, referring this bug and requesting the rewording for the appropriate sections in the bash manual. note: there is a typo in your text in the section for BASH_LINENO. the second "where" should be "were" ** Attachment added: "demonstration_of_bash_source_and_lineno.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49662585/demonstration_of_bash_source_and_lineno.txt -- BASH_SOURCE is not correct https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415217] Re: bash history without duplicates
i was also considering to mark this bug as duplicate of bug #189881 but they really are two different bugs. bug #189881 is about the request that HISTCONTROL=erasedups should also clear duplicates from the bash history file this bug is about a request to have HISTCONTROL=erasedups as default in .bashrc (/etc/skel/.bashrc) ignoreboth means ignorespace and ignoredups. erasedups is yet another thing. -- bash history without duplicates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415217] Re: bash history without duplicates
edited the description the original description implied that HISTCONTROL=erasedups will also erase duplicates from the history file. that is not the case. see bug #189881 ** Description changed: By default, when a command is used in a console, that one is saved in bash history. - The problem is that each new command is saved again even if that command exist in history: .bash_history become fatty & it's a pain to recall a previous command using arrows. + The problem is that each new command is saved again even if that command exist in history. bash history become fatty & it's a pain to recall a previous command using arrows. The solution is to modify the .bashrc file by adding: export HISTCONTROL=ignoredups:erasedups to prevent duplicates Please, make that change as default. -- bash history without duplicates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415217 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore
i can confirm that this bug is fixed Rolf Leggewie said in comment #9 that he mistakenly assumed HISTCONTROL to affect the history file, which it does not, and confirmed that he sees the bug as fixed. the mailing list discussion linked by reini in comment #11 also revolves around HISTCONTROL not affecting the history file. that behaviour is also discussed in bug #189881. marking as fix released as said comment #5 ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589496] Re: bash --rcfile does not behave as documented
here are two "upstream" bugs (debian is upstream, right?) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516152 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343673 note: those two bugs are duplicates of each other, but i was not able to find out how to mark bugs as duplicate in the debian bug tracker. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #516152 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516152 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #343673 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343673 -- bash --rcfile does not behave as documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589496] [NEW] bash --rcfile does not behave as documented
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash the bash manpage says this about --rcfile --rcfile file Execute commands from file instead of the system wide initial‐ ization file /etc/bash.bashrc and the standard personal initial‐ ization file ~/.bashrc if the shell is interactive (see INVOCA‐ TION below). under INVOCATION it says When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash reads and executes commands from /etc/bash.bashrc and ~/.bashrc, if these files exist. This may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of /etc/bash.bashrc and ~/.bashrc. but when i execute $ bash --rcfile somercfilewhichreallydoesexistandisreadableandall it will still read /etc/bash/bashrc (can be verified by adding --verbose) using lucid with bash 4.1-2ubuntu3 ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bash --rcfile does not behave as documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301796] Re: Bash Invocation Source Files DO NOT fullfill Documented STandards
i was not able to reproduce this. starting bash as an interactive shell reliably reads .bashrc even "sudo bash" read my .bashrc (note: it read my .bashrc, not /root/.bashrc) about "sudo bash": http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/05/09/a-root-shell- on-ubuntu-the-right-way/ i will mark this bug invalid. please feel free to reopen this bug if it still is an issue for you. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Bash Invocation Source Files DO NOT fullfill Documented STandards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301796 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589460] [NEW] questionable comments for HISTCONTROL in /etc/skel/.bashrc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash using lucid with bash 4.1-2ubuntu3 as a followup to bug #465500 the lines in question now read: # don't put duplicate lines in the history. See bash(1) for more options # ... or force ignoredups and ignorespace HISTCONTROL=ignoredups:ignorespace the second line doesn't make any sense. it starts with "or", as opposed to what? it says "force", what does it force? i find this wording (adapted from the description of bug #465500) much better: # don't put duplicate lines or lines starting with space in the history. # See bash(1) for more information HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- questionable comments for HISTCONTROL in /etc/skel/.bashrc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76807] Re: /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 465500 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465500 lol. thanks to bug #78596 i have to reassign dupes by hand. sorry for the bugmail spam this will cause. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 465500 Setting HISTCONTROL twice in /etc/skel/.bashrc -- /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218947] Re: HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth is documented wrong in /etc/skel/.bashrc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 465500 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465500 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 76807 /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 465500 Setting HISTCONTROL twice in /etc/skel/.bashrc -- HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth is documented wrong in /etc/skel/.bashrc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239948] Re: typo in default user's ~/.bashrc file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 465500 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465500 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 76807 /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 465500 Setting HISTCONTROL twice in /etc/skel/.bashrc -- typo in default user's ~/.bashrc file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76807] Re: /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession.
i see that this bug is fixed but the changelog credits bug #465500 oh well i think it is best to mark this bug as duplicate -- /etc/skel/.bashrc sets HISTCONTROL twice in succession. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318678] Re: BASH_SOURCE is not correct
the bash manual says that BASH_SOURCE shows filename where a function is defined (and not the filename from where the function is called). http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Bash-Variables.html #index-BASH_005fSOURCE-174 as Barre said in comment #2 you can check the filename from where the function is called by checking index 1 in the array. the array is ordered after FUNCNAME which is a call stack of bash functions. look for FUNCNAME in the bash manual page linked above. marking as invalid. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- BASH_SOURCE is not correct https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318678 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 487613] Re: "history -c" doesn't clear bash history
i think this bug is invalid. history -c is behaving as intended: it clears the history of the current session. if you want to have the history completely removed then you have to make sure the history file is also cleared. to be really sure you will also have to clear the history of any other running bash sessions. note that there are many different ways to manipulate how bash handles the history in memory and the history file. i recommend to read the bash manual about history. here is the section about the history command http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Bash-History-Builtins.html the bash manual is a bit vague about the concept of the history. it should state more clearly that at any given time there are at least two instances of the history: one is the history kept in the memory of the currently running bash session, the other is the history kept in the history file (usually ~/.bash_history or whatever is defined in the variable $HISTFILE). in case of the history command some options manipulate the history file, while the other options (including the option -c) only manipulates the history which is kept in the memory of the currently running session. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- "history -c" doesn't clear bash history https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 565051] Re: gnome-terminal background remains faintly transparent when "solid color" background selected
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 549552 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549552 i don't think that this bug is invalid. the option says solid color but it does not give solid color. that is a bug. the fix is either to make the option really do solid color, or to relabel to option to say "use transparency setting from system theme". anyway, i marked this bug duplicate of #549552 where they already discussed this. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 549552 [lucid] solid colour BG is transparent -- gnome-terminal background remains faintly transparent when "solid color" background selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526553] Re: flash does not register touchpad click
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410407 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410407 Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION] -- flash does not register touchpad click https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578220] Re: feature request: add general settings which will apply to every device of the same class
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48205791/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48205792/ProcEnviron.txt -- feature request: add general settings which will apply to every device of the same class https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578220] [NEW] feature request: add general settings which will apply to every device of the same class
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gpointing-device-settings add general settings which will apply to every device of the same class. example: for every "mouse type device" i want to use "wheel emulation" on button 2 and enable vertical and horizontal scrolling. now everytime i connect a "mouse type device" this settings will be applied to it. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gpointing-device-settings 1.3.2-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon May 10 13:32:48 2010 SourcePackage: gpointing-device-settings ** Affects: gpointing-device-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- feature request: add general settings which will apply to every device of the same class https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 562414] Re: gpointing-device-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in gpds_xinput_utils_get_device_info()
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #573979 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573979 ** Also affects: gpointing-device-settings via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573979 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gpointing-device-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in gpds_xinput_utils_get_device_info() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526781] Re: No safe graphics mode in Lucid pre-Alpha 3 Live CD
i think this bug should not be marked invalid. xforcevesa is replaced by nomodeset. so what. keep the option "safe graphics mode" and set it up so that it does nomodeset. btw.: i tried both nomodeset and xforcevesa in the lucid live cd. nomodeset had no effect while xforcevesa had an effect, although not the effect that i hoped for, but that is stuff for another bug report. -- No safe graphics mode in Lucid pre-Alpha 3 Live CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96434] Re: gnome keyboard indicator "Alt left+Alt right" shortcut does not work anymore.
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- gnome keyboard indicator "Alt left+Alt right" shortcut does not work anymore. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226676] Re: Right ALT not working as key modifier
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- Right ALT not working as key modifier https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251443] Re: keyboard layout switching shortcuts like Alt+Alt do not work anymore
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- keyboard layout switching shortcuts like Alt+Alt do not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363363] Re: Keyboard Layout Key(s) to change layout doesn't work
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- Keyboard Layout Key(s) to change layout doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382473] Re: right-alt key not working after changing "keyboard layout change" key to "both alt keys together"
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- right-alt key not working after changing "keyboard layout change" key to "both alt keys together" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438520] Re: Right Alt key is always selected under "key to choose 3rd level"
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- Right Alt key is always selected under "key to choose 3rd level" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462249] Re: "Both Alt keys together" to change layout does not work
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- "Both Alt keys together" to change layout does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76901] Re: right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts)
there are many bugs about a not working right alt key. and there are many bugs about a not working shortcut to change keyboard layout (left alt + right alt). as far as i can tell fixing the right alt key would also fix the keyboard layout problem. could someone with more knowledge than me in the topic please look at these bugs and generously mark as duplicate. in no particular order: bug #76901 (marked as fixed, but obviously there is a regression) bug #363363 bug #251443 bug #462249 bug #96434 bug #226676 bug #382473 bug #438520 -- right Alt key not recognized by default (lv3:ralt_switch shouldn't be set by default for US keyboard layouts) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67141] Re: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default
** Package changed: grep (Ubuntu) => ubuntu -- Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67141] Re: Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default
i think this bug should not be reported against grep but against ubuntu, if that is possible. i tried to do that but i failed. just for reference, here is a list of bug reports about problems caused by GREP_OPTIONS: bug #75031 bug #257984 bug #398393 bug #540733 also related: bug #545675 and for the fun of it, i also started a brainstorm about this: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/24141/ -- Please create and enforce a system-wide policy to unset GREP_OPTION by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 545675] [NEW] warn about GREP_OPTIONS in the man page
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grep the many bug reports we have about problems caused by GREP_OPTIONS justifies a warning in the man page. i'm thinking of something along these lines: GREP_OPTIONS This variable specifies default options to be placed in front of any explicit options. For example, ... WARNING: setting this variable will most likely cause (system) scripts to break in a strange and obscure way. it is better to use an alias (see man bash) instead. related: bug #67141 see following bug reports for problems caused by GREP_OPTIONS bug #75031 bug #257984 bug #398393 bug #540733 ** Affects: grep (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- warn about GREP_OPTIONS in the man page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367721] Re: Usability: too many wireless networks makes it hard to find and pick the one you want
i changed the package from network-manager to network-manager-applet because this bug is about the front-end. AFAIK network-manager is just the back-end and doesn't care about sorting anything. i don't know about the status so i left it at "confirmed". also sort of related: bug #485041 ** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) => network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) -- Usability: too many wireless networks makes it hard to find and pick the one you want https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483021] Re: Don't put strong networks in "More networks"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 485041 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485041 marked as duplicate of bug #485041. even though this bug was reported first, bug #485041 is already assigned upstream and triaged. note that this bug is reported against "network manager" while bug#485041 is reported against "network manager applet", which is the correct package IMHO. -- Don't put strong networks in "More networks" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483021] Re: Don't put strong networks in "More networks"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 485041 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485041 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 485041 Order of available wireless networks should be by strength, not alphabetical. -- Don't put strong networks in "More networks" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245940] Re: command "grep" or redirection going in a loop.
i think this would be the upstream bug (note: the comments are sorted newest first): http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17457 strangely the mailing list thread for this bug goes longer than the actual bug: report http://www.mail-archive.com/bug- g...@gnu.org/msg00770.html bottom line seems to be that this behaviour is by design (it's not a bug, it's a feature). when you redirect the results of grep into a file, and grep comes around to look at that file, then grep will find occurences infinitely. why this does not occur all the time seems to be a side effect of some buffers. @Vaneet Dadra you can prevent the infinite loop by redirecting the results to a file outside or above the tree you are grepping: $ grep MAX -r somedirectory > ../somefile ** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #17457 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?17457 -- command "grep" or redirection going in a loop. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245940 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540740] [NEW] wajig installfoo gives misleading error message
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wajig using ubuntu karmic wajig version 2.0.43 $ wajig install wajig: Error: INSTALL requires a list of packages, .deb files, or url $ wajig installlolcats wajig: Error: INSTALLLOLCATS requires a list of packages, .deb files, or url this error message is misleading because it gives the impression that INSTALLLOLCATS is a valid command compare this with following behaviour $ wajig detail wajig: Error: DETAIL requires a list of packages or package file $ wajig detaillollerskates The command `detaillollerskates' was not recognised. Perhaps it is not yet implemented or you misspelt the command. Try `wajig help' for further information. Try `wajig list-commands' for list of all commands. ** Affects: wajig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wajig installfoo gives misleading error message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540742] [NEW] wajig does not know about virtual packages
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wajig using ubuntu karmic wajig version 2.0.43 $ wajig install freeciv [sudo] password for lesmana: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package freeciv is a virtual package provided by: freeciv-client-sdl 2.1.9-1 freeciv-client-gtk 2.1.9-1 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package freeciv has no installation candidate $ wajig detail freeciv No packages found from those known to be available or installed maybe related to bug #50311? ** Affects: wajig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wajig does not know about virtual packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540742 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540733] Re: GREP_OPTIONS breaks wajig
argh. the output is garbled by non-fixed-width fonts :( let me attach a textfile. the error is visible in the last line: * the package name is "5594:grep" (5594 must be the line number of the output which wajig greped) * the installed version is N/A although grep is installed * the remaining columns are very likely shifted to the right by one or something ** Attachment added: "wajigoutput.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41206614/wajigoutput.txt -- GREP_OPTIONS breaks wajig https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540733] [NEW] GREP_OPTIONS breaks wajig
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wajig using ubuntu karmic wajig version 2.0.43 $ GREP_OPTIONS= wajig status grep Package Installed PreviousNow State ===-===-===-===-= grep2.5.4-4 2.5.4-4 2.5.4-4 install $ GREP_OPTIONS="--line-number" wajig status grep Package Installed PreviousNow State ===-===-===-===-= 5594:grep N/A 2.5.4-4 2.5.4-4 wajig should make sure to unset GREP_OPTIONS before using grep ** Affects: wajig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GREP_OPTIONS breaks wajig https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540692] [NEW] "unmount partitions that are in use?" dialog is confusing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity using karmic livecd. the dialog text goes like this: The installer has detected that the following disks have mounted partitions: /dev/sda Do you want the installer to try to unmount the partitions on these disks before continuing? If you leave them mounted, you will not be able to create, delete, or resize partitions on these disks, but you may be able to install to existing partitions there. (buttons at the end are "No" and "Yes") this text is confusing. by the time i got to the yes and no buttons i was surprised because i no longer have a question in my mind. the last thing i had in mind was an explanation about what i will not be able to do to certain partitions, why do i need yes or no for that? i think this wording is better The installer has detected that the following disks have mounted partitions: /dev/sda If you leave them mounted, you will not be able to create, delete, or resize partitions on these disks, but you may be able to install to existing partitions there. Do you want the installer to try to unmount the partitions on these disks before continuing? (buttons at the end "Yes, try to unmount" and "No, keep them mounted") see also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/346589/comments/11 somewhat related bug #346589, bug #363069, bug #193270 note: i am using the karmic livecd, but i checked the source package here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/2.2.5 and as far as i understand this same dialog text is still on the lucid beta livecd. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- "unmount partitions that are in use?" dialog is confusing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490772] Re: When saving file, gedit reset tab width to 8 characters
is this a duplicate of bug #340056? -- When saving file, gedit reset tab width to 8 characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490772 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347065] Re: fullscreen flash video is choppy and takes 100% CPU
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346289 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346289 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346289 Choppy Flash playback in full screen. -- fullscreen flash video is choppy and takes 100% CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364932] Re: flash playback jerky in jaunty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346289 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346289 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346289 Choppy Flash playback in full screen. -- flash playback jerky in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435488] Re: scrollwheel should scroll not zoom
** Description changed: Binary package hint: eog in eye of gnome scrolling the scrollwheel should scroll and not zoom. zoom should be done using ctrl+scrollwheel. that way it would be more consistent with other apps and also conforming to gnomes own human interface guideline. http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/input-mouse.html.en using ubuntu jaunty + + related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gthumb/+bug/435550 (scrollwheel should scroll not browse) + a bit related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/92607 (using "ctrl + mouse scroll wheel" for zooming is inconsistent in different application) -- scrollwheel should scroll not zoom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435550] [NEW] scrollwheel should scroll not browse
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gthumb in gthumb, viewing an image, scrolling the scrollwheel should scroll the image instead of browsing to the next/previous image. that way it would be more consistent with other apps and also conforming to gnomes own human interface guideline. http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/input-mouse.html.en using ubuntu jaunty related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/435488 (scrollwheel should scroll not zoom) a bit related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/92607 (using "ctrl + mouse scroll wheel" for zooming is inconsistent in different application) ** Affects: gthumb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- scrollwheel should scroll not browse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435550 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435488] [NEW] scrollwheel should scroll not zoom
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog in eye of gnome scrolling the scrollwheel should scroll and not zoom. zoom should be done using ctrl+scrollwheel. that way it would be more consistent with other apps and also conforming to gnomes own human interface guideline. http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/input-mouse.html.en using ubuntu jaunty ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- scrollwheel should scroll not zoom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379367] Re: gedit add a newline at the end of file.I hope it can be config
i did some searching in the gnome bugzilla and found this http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95676 basically it is the opposite of this bug report, instead of one extra newline there is a line missing. maybe the patch for that bug caused this bug? ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #95676 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95676 -- gedit add a newline at the end of file.I hope it can be config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329655] Re: Launchpad bug reporting should have a preview function.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 33796 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33796 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 33796 Preview of comments -- Launchpad bug reporting should have a preview function. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289023] Re: Wheel emulation doesn't work after suspend/resume
i too am affected by this bug. i have a thinkpad x40. i made fdi files
similar to comment #4. for me this bug doesn't happen at every
suspend/resume, it happends about once in five suspen/resume cycles.
there is a workaround and maybe also fix for this problem in thinkwiki:
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_configure_the_TrackPoint
here the text from thinkwiki
Scrolling may be disabled after a resume from suspend.
You can manually reactivate the trackpoint by reloading the psmouse
module as root:
# rmmod psmouse && modprobe psmouse
You can automatically force the pm-utils to reload this module. Create a
file /etc/pm/config.d/01reload_mouse as root with the following content:
# reload psmouse to reactivate trackpoint scrolling
SUSPEND_MODULES="${SUSPEND_MODULES:+$SUSPEND_MODULES }psmouse"
--
Wheel emulation doesn't work after suspend/resume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289023
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306591] Re: Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session
i think the original bug report is not a bug because gnome should not read the shell initialization files. gnome (gdm) reads the .profile (see /etc/gdm/Xsession) so any LC_* settings is best put there. see also my anser at https://answers.launchpad.net/questions/60699 -- Locale settings in shell initialization not used by GNOME session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356371] Re: java control panel does not respect LC_MESSAGES
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24875771/Dependencies.txt -- java control panel does not respect LC_MESSAGES https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356371] [NEW] java control panel does not respect LC_MESSAGES
Public bug reported: following command line will start java control panel in german $ LANG=de_DE.utf8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.10/bin/ControlPanel expected behaviour is to start java control panel in english. i tested some other combination of LANG and LC_MESSAGES and it seems java control panel only checks for LANG and ignores LC_MESSAGES. i didn't test any other LC_* variables. for example of a correct behaviour: this command line will start gedit in english, but when you insert date (edit > insert date and time) it will be in german format $ LANG=de_DE.utf8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8 gedit ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=de_DE.utf8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: sun-java6 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-14-generic i686 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- java control panel does not respect LC_MESSAGES https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356371 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582
** Attachment added: "xorg log from ubuntu 9.04 alpha 4 using intel driver 2.6.99" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22511907/Xorg.0.log.2.6.99 -- Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582
i tried the 2.6.99.1 driver using the ubuntu 9.04 alpha 4 live cd. i was not able to install the 2.6.99.1 driver under ubuntu 8.10 because of the dependencies. to be exact, i used following command: dpkg -i xserver-xorg-video- intel_2.6.99.1+git20090207.3aa8591a-0ubuntu0tormod2_i386.deb the 2.6.1 driver shipped with the alpha 4 live cd was working fine (although still with the 1024x768 problem). the 2.6.99 driver showed the same problem as in my original report, the entire display showed the color of one pixel. perhaps this is because of the integrated LVDS quirk in the 2.6.1 driver? ** Attachment added: "xorg log from ubuntu 9.04 alpha 4 using intel driver 2.6.1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22511892/Xorg.0.log.2.6.1 -- Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189694] Re: [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768
** Attachment added: "output of lspci -vvnn" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20232689/lspci-vvnn_output.txt -- [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189694] Re: [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768
** Attachment added: "output of xrandr after LVDS quirk" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20232601/xrandr_output_afterLVDSquirk.txt -- [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189694] Re: [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log after LVDS quirk" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20232585/Xorg.0.log_afterLVDSquirk -- [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189694] Re: [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768
i still have this problem using ubuntu 8.10 and xserver-xorg-video-intel version 2:2.4.1-1ubuntu10.1 my monitor should be able to show 1600x1200. using ubuntu 7.10 and 8.04 it did 1600x1200 correctly. after upgrade to 8.10 it wouldn't go higher than 1024x768. i also have (had) a problem with the LVDS output which is discussed in this bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/305269 -- [i855GME] maximum resolution limited to 1024x768 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582
changed the bug title i think this bug covers my other problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/189694 -- Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582
** Summary changed: - [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel + Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582 -- Need LVDSout quirk for 8086:3582 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
** Attachment added: "output of xrandr after quirk" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20220219/xrandr_output_afterLVDSquirk.txt -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log after quirk" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20220215/Xorg.0.log_afterLVDSquirk -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
i tried the quirk and now i see a proper image, but first to my system setup. the system is a not a notebook but not a common desktop either. mainboard is a mb890 (link http://www.ibase-i.com.tw/mb890.htm ). the mainboard has three video outputs: VGA, DVI and LVDS. my monitor is connected to the DVI output. monitor is an IBM ThinkVision L200p. other video outputs are not connected to anything, as far as i can tell. my xorg.conf was already a "minimal" xorg.conf (as created by dpkg- reconfigure), so renaming xorg.conf and restarting x didn't change the behaviour. i then tried the quirk and added the LVDS ignore lines in xorg.conf and now i have a proper image, but the resolution is limited to 1024x768. the monitor is able to go up to 1600x1200. should i post a new "Need LVDSout quirk for " bug as suggested in the wiki? i do see a proper image now but the resolution is still not correct. i'm sure it would be possible to force xorg to 1600x1200 using appropriate xorg.conf lines, but it would be better if the driver did it right automatically. -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
** Attachment added: "output of lspci -vvnn" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20219760/lspci-vvnn_output.txt -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
** Attachment added: "output of xrandr" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20212692/xrandr_output.txt -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] Re: [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20212655/Xorg.0.log -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305269] [NEW] [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel since i upgraded to ubuntu 8.10 my entire display shows just one color (under gdm and under x). i asume it is the color value of a certain pixel because when i move the mouse in a certain spot it will switch color from black to white to brown. aside from the display problem everything else is working fine. i can login, i can start applications (using the alt+f2 tool), i can switch to the virtual console and see the applications i started using ps. i made a screenshot using scrot, the image is showing a normal desktop with a resolution of 1024x768 (monitor should show 1600x1200). using ubuntu 8.10 and xserver-xorg-video-intel version 2:2.4.1-1ubuntu10.1 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 855gm intrepid -- [855gm] entire display shows color of certain pixel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305269 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57767] Re: display is garbled on intel 855gm
this bug can be marked as fixed see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12420 -- display is garbled on intel 855gm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57767] Re: display is garbled on intel 855gm
the display is still garbled on resolutions over 1024x768. should i post the current xorg.log and xorg.conf? -- display is garbled on intel 855gm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77215] Re: x server crashes after loading xkb keymap
modified keymap. modifications are marked with "//HAXX" ** Attachment added: "modified keymap" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5558120/keymap.xkb -- x server crashes after loading xkb keymap https://launchpad.net/bugs/77215 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77215] Re: x server crashes after loading xkb keymap
this is my original keymap obtained using "xkbcomp :0.0 -xkb" ** Attachment added: "my original keymap" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5558103/server-0_0.xkb -- x server crashes after loading xkb keymap https://launchpad.net/bugs/77215 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77215] Re: x server crashes after loading xkb keymap
** Attachment added: "the x log file" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5558078/Xorg.1.log -- x server crashes after loading xkb keymap https://launchpad.net/bugs/77215 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77215] x server crashes after loading xkb keymap
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg i was playing around with xkb, it was working fine until i made this specific keymap, which will reliably crash my x server. steps to reproduce 1. start another x server from a virtual console "startx -- :1" 2. load keymap using "xkbcomp keymap.xkb :1.0" 3. watch x crash note that if using :0.0 instead of :1.0 it will crash :0.0. i will upload the keymap and the x.log file shortly using ubuntu 6.06 ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- x server crashes after loading xkb keymap https://launchpad.net/bugs/77215 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74460] Re: does not delete menu entry if removed
i tried what you suggested. the menu entries are now gone. it seems that i did some time ago changed the menu entries from pioneers. thanks and sorry for the hassle. previously i searched /usr for pioneers and found these $ find /usr/ -iname "pioneers*" /usr/share/app-install/desktop/pioneers-server.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/pioneers.desktop /usr/share/app-install/icons/pioneers-server.png /usr/share/app-install/icons/pioneers.png i thought those are the menu entries which have not been removed. but that directory seems to be a general repository of all menu entries for ubuntu supported applications. -- does not delete menu entry if removed https://launchpad.net/bugs/74460 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74460] does not delete menu entry if removed
Public bug reported: if package is removed the menu entry under games will remain. the icon is gone but the entry is still there. note: using ubuntu 6.06 version of pioneers-server-gtk is 0.9.55-1 ** Affects: pioneers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: if package is removed the menu entry under games will remain. the icon is gone but the entry is still there. + + note: using ubuntu 6.06 + version of pioneers-server-gtk is 0.9.55-1 -- does not delete menu entry if removed https://launchpad.net/bugs/74460 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57767] Re: display is garbled on intel 855gm
oops, i clicked on that button in the notification at the top, which said that the bug is not in the xorg package, and it put xorg back in the list without asking for confirmation. i am sorry for the troubles caused, i am not trying to be pedantic or something. i must add that i also tried the vesa driver in xorg.conf and it showed the same garble. so the problem is not limited to the i810 driver. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg i have the mb890 motherboard http://www.ibase-i.com.tw/mb890.htm graphic chip is intel 855gme the board has a DVI and analog and LVDS - using ubunut 6.06, started as livecd and installed. + using ubuntu 6.06, started as livecd and installed. when monitor is connected to analog all will show correct. when connected to DVI and resolution set to 1280 x 1024 or higher then display will be garbled. -- display is garbled on intel 855gm https://launchpad.net/bugs/57767 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57767] Re: display is garbled on intel 855gm
everytime i switch to text console using ctrl+alt+f1 and back to gui i get another type of garble, i counted up to 4 different garble types. this photo shows the least garbled garble. all other garble types are garbled beyond recognition. sometimes even the text console will garble a bit. note that when i take a screenshot using the printscreen key it will show ok. -- display is garbled on intel 855gm https://launchpad.net/bugs/57767 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
