[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
You have a typo in the description: > the massive Y2028 time_t transition I think you mean Y20*3*8. Not a big deal, but just for clarity you should probably fix that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2043863] Re: Keyboard Settings Won't Open (Ubuntu Unity 23.10)
Further info may be relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/UbuntuUnity/comments/1axuqy5/2310_cant_open_keyboard_settings/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043863 Title: Keyboard Settings Won't Open (Ubuntu Unity 23.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/2043863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2043863] Re: Keyboard Settings Won't Open (Ubuntu Unity 23.10)
Also affects right shift key, but left still works. I had to use cut and paste even to log in to register this affects me too. No Ctrl keys, only 1 shift, can't open keyboard settings. Goes away on reboot but soon recurs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043863 Title: Keyboard Settings Won't Open (Ubuntu Unity 23.10) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/2043863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1743798] Re: Kernel sometimes panics during early boot if CPU microcode archive prepended to initramfs
I had the same issue with 20.04 on a Thinkpad X220. I managed to resolve it by installing the HWE kernel, adding a dedicated swap partition on another drive, purging ZRAM, and rebuilding my `initrd`. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743798 Title: Kernel sometimes panics during early boot if CPU microcode archive prepended to initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1743798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems
@jeremie2 Ah, fair enough. Mostly I use Ventoy these days, and once the USB key is formatted with Ventoy, you just copy .ISO files onto it and they automagically appear in the Ventoy boot menu. So no need for Balena Etcher etc. any more. Ventoy itself is bootable on BIOS and UEFI PCs and on Intel Macs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964 Title: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems
In replie to @jeremie2 in comment #24: I don't think this is a general description of the problem, because for me, my USB boot keys don't have separate EFI boot partitions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964 Title: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915152] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1893964 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1893964 Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915152 Title: Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1915152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915152] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition
Confirmed and reproduced in Xubuntu 20.10 as well. This issue is _not_ confined to Ubuntu Unity and is also present in an official remix. Steps taken to try to resolve it: * updated system BIOS (machine is a Lenovo Thinkpad W500; was on 3.18, now on 3.23, latest) -> no change • tried 2 different flavours of 20.10 -> no change • placed a bootable DOS primary partition (C:), set active, tested OK; no change. • installed Windows 7 Enterprise SP1. No UEFI detected, no EFI partition created, no separate system partition needed or used. Ubuntu Unity 20.04 went on this machine without a glitch. openSUSE Leap 15.2 was also fine. The machine does not have UEFI, as far as I can tell. There is no option to boot in legacy or UEFI mode. The only way I have discovered to install 20.10 was to tell it my DOS partition was the EFI System Partition. This worked fine, installed GRUB into /dev/sda and now it boots. However this has rendered my DOS partition unbootable, and now it is mounted at /boot/efi which is not what I want. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915152 Title: Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1915152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1915152] [NEW] Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition
Public bug reported: Even on BIOS systems with no UEFI ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: ubiquity 20.10.13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-25.26-generic 5.8.14 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./pool/main/b/binutils/binutils-common_2.35.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CasperVersion: 1.455 Date: Tue Feb 9 15:38:57 2021 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz boot=casper file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity ignore_uuid quiet splash --- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu Unity 20.10 RebootRequiredPkgs: linux-image-5.8.0-25-generic linux-base SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubiquity-20.10.13 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915152 Title: Installation of Ubuntu Unity 20.10 always fails if there is no EFI partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1915152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1665048] Re: xfce4-display-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
Confirmed in 17.10 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665048 Title: xfce4-display-settings crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-settings/+bug/1665048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327793] Re: Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled
This bug has reappeared as of 7 May 2017 in 16.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327793 Title: Window decorations in title bar missing with compiz enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/327793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622880] Re: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10
I am still having problems. I tried removing, purging & reinstalling Nautilus; no joy. Then I found this bug and tried: * Removing ~/.config/nautilus This worked. I have desktop icons again and a file manager. However, Nautilus has just one menu, titled "Files", and it contains no entries. A small narrow blank rectangle appears, nothing else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622880 Title: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1622880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622880] Re: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10
Ah, apparently a known problem for years: http://askubuntu.com/questions/75733/nautilus-menus-empty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622880 Title: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1622880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622880] Re: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10
This might be connected: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/403139 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622880 Title: nautilus crashes on Ubuntu 16.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1622880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379062] Re: Graphics problem in Virtualbox
This post describes the problem with a screenshot: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13615 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379062 Title: Graphics problem in Virtualbox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1379062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1379062] Re: Graphics problem in Virtualbox
I have confirmed that this bug also affects Lubuntu 16.04.1 (32-bit) running under VirtualBox 5.1 (the latest version, at the time of writing.) The workaround also works: switching to a text console. Others report that it did NOT happen with the original release 16.04. ** Bug watch added: Virtualbox Trac #13615 http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13615 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379062 Title: Graphics problem in Virtualbox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1379062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1563184] Re: Chromium-browser armhf crashes with "InitializeSandbox() called with multiple threads in process gpu-process"
Replicated on Lubuntu 16.04 on RasPi 3. Fully updated, Chromium 50 segfaults. --no-sandbox does not work; still segfaults. As per this page: https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/chromium-crashes-when-starting-segfaults/4578 I also tried --disable-pinch. Doesn't work; still segfaults. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563184 Title: Chromium-browser armhf crashes with "InitializeSandbox() called with multiple threads in process gpu-process" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1563184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1212199] Re: 10ec:8168 [MSI P35 Neo] Network not working after resume from suspend
@penalvch: Can you or someone please explain to me how opening a new bug will help? There are already 4 that I can find which are all describing exactly the same problem, which has been extant since before Saucy was released. I am commenting here as this one has at least 25 subscribers, whereas the others have fewer. It seems to be the same problem as Bug #1235864 , Bug #1247468 and Bug #1252121 at least. Furthermore there is no obvious way to file a report against a particular package. The problem occurs in network-manager and restarting that daemon seems to sort it out; however it is visible in nm-applet and it is possibly caused by the kernel. What should we file reports against? Please explain to us what we should do and how. I don't see how additional reports will help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1212199 Title: 10ec:8168 [MSI P35 Neo] Network not working after resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1212199/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242356] Re: package fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured
I'm afraid I can't, as I no longer own the machine that experienced the problem. Sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242356 Title: package fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1242356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242361] Re: package imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured
I'm afraid I can't, as I no longer own the machine that experienced the problem. Sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242361 Title: package imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1242361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1247468] Re: Network-manager is disabled after suspend
Happening to me as well on Toshiba Satellite Pro P300-1AY. Looks like Bug #1235864 Bug #1212199 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247468 Title: Network-manager is disabled after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1247468/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1235864] Re: Network down after resume
Happening to me as well on Toshiba Satellite Pro P300-1AY. Looks like Bug #1212199 Bug #1247468 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235864 Title: Network down after resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1235864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1212199] Re: 10ec:8168 [MSI P35 Neo] Network not working after resume from suspend
Happening to me as well on Toshiba Satellite Pro P300-1AY. Looks like Bug #1235864 Bug #1247468 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1212199 Title: 10ec:8168 [MSI P35 Neo] Network not working after resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1212199/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242356] [NEW] package fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Bug still present in Saucy final ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-12.19-generic 3.11.3 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Oct 20 15:26:18 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:fonts-horai-umefont:454-1:package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured ErrorMessage: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-10-20 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 (20131016.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242356 Title: package fonts-horai-umefont 454-1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-horai-umefont is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1242356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180732] Re: package fonts-droid 1:4.2.r1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-droid is already installed and configured
Still present in Saucy final -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180732 Title: package fonts-droid 1:4.2.r1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package fonts-droid is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1180732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242361] [NEW] package imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: Saucy final, clean install. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-12.19-generic 3.11.3 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Oct 20 15:26:18 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:imagemagick-common:8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3:package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured ErrorMessage: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-10-20 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 (20131016.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242361 Title: package imagemagick-common 8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package imagemagick-common is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1242361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1233545] Re: Screen corruption on radeon chipset
Affects an RV620 in my Toshiba Satellite Pro P300A, too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1233545 Title: Screen corruption on radeon chipset To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1233545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739184] Re: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity
I should have added - this is under XMir using the FOSS AMD/ATI drivers: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV620/M82 [Mobility Radeon HD 3450/3470] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739184 Title: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/739184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739184] Re: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity
LibreOffice 4.1.1.2 in the latest pre-release build of Saucy is still affected by this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739184 Title: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/739184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1095686] Re: xorg needs to be updated to allow quantal xserver stack to be installed
How does one use or apply this fix? AIUI this is the same problem described here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/287797/xserver-xorg-lts-quantal-will-remove-many-packages I have installed the xserver-xorg-lts-precise metapackage but this has not installed anything else as I am currently running the Precise X stack. The above seems not to be a fix. AFAICS, what it does is conveniently allow one to /recover/ from the problem -- it does not prevent the installation of the Quantal X stack from removing loads of necessary components, it just makes it easier to revert back from the Quantal X stack to the Precise X stack. Do I understand correctly? If so, it is not a fix. It does not enable one to upgrade an installed 12.04 or 12.04-1 system to 12.04-2, i.e. install the 12.10 versions of X.org. /That/ is the bug that is really being reported here AIUI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095686 Title: xorg needs to be updated to allow quantal xserver stack to be installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1095686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1069971] Re: Libreoffice hotkeys (Alt + ) do not work - lo-menubar NOT installed - Fresh install of 12.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 739184 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739184 This is still a problem in Quantal and Raring. It is more of an issue than ever with Raring because there is no libreoffice-gtk package to remove. Some other workaround is urgently needed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069971 Title: Libreoffice hotkeys (Alt + ) do not work - lo-menubar NOT installed - Fresh install of 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1069971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739184] Re: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity
This is still a problem in Quantal and Raring. It is more of an issue than ever with Raring because there is no libreoffice-gtk package to remove. Some other workaround is urgently needed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739184 Title: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/739184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1095044] Re: Compiz crashes at login, every single boot
I have done this but Compiz only crashes at boot/first login time, so I doubt that it will help. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095044 Title: Compiz crashes at login, every single boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1095044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1095044] [NEW] Compiz crashes at login, every single boot
Public bug reported: Since the last batch of updates of 2012, my PC, which is set to auto- login, experiences a Compiz crash at every boot, before I can click or do anything. I have just 1 app set to auto-start: Firefox. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: compiz 1:0.9.8.6-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 310.14 Tue Oct 9 11:52:41 PDT 2012 GCC version: gcc version 4.7.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,place,imgpng,regex,mousepoll,resize,snap,session,vpswitch,gnomecompat,move,wall,animation,grid,workarounds,expo,fade,ezoom,scale,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Tue Jan 1 13:46:43 2013 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia-experimental-310, 310.14, 3.5.0-19-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-experimental-310, 310.14, 3.5.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.2.4, 3.5.0-19-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.2.4, 3.5.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce GTS 250] [10de:0615] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Device [1682:2601] InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-18 (43 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: System manufacturer P5K SE MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-21-generic root=UUID=4f6184a2-4bc7-4f63-83c0-a2de3e8d02e5 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: compiz UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/25/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1402 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5K SE dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1402:bd06/25/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnP5KSE:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5KSE:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: P5K SE dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8.6-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.39-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0-0ubuntu1 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120913.8637f772-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.9-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu3 ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 quantal running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095044 Title: Compiz crashes at login, every single boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1095044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739184] Re: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity
Confirmed. This was previously a problem with ``lo-menubar'' in 11.04/11.10/12.04. Now in 12.10 the problem has been transferred from the additional/not-installed-by-default ``lo-menubar'' package into Libreoffice's GTK integration and thus this bug now affects everyone. Removing ``libreoffice-gtk'' does effectively fix it, but breaks other things. This is a showstopper bug for some of us who use the keyboard as our primary method of interacting with the apps. It is also a complete showstopper for blind/disabled users who cannot use a mouse or other pointing device. No, the HUD is not an alternative. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739184 Title: [Libreoffice] Mnemonics do not work in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/739184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899671] [NEW] Aisleriot Freecell does not report the game number
Public bug reported: When starting a new Freecell game, Aisleriot does not show the game number (the seed value from which the card layout was generated.) All other Freecell games on all platforms I've tried do this, so that you can record when you lose a game and retry it later, exchange hard games with your friends and so on. This includes Win32 Freecell, Windows 7 Freecell, the 3rd party Freecell Plus, the Mac OS X Freecell by the late Alisdair McDiarmid of http://randomoracle.org/ and so on. This is not a bug but a feature request, but I can't find any author or any direct contact for the team to report it. This is the only way I know, I'm afraid. Associated functionality: enter a game number to retry a previous game, as opposed to just getting a new random game every time. ** Affects: aisleriot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899671 Title: Aisleriot Freecell does not report the game number To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aisleriot/+bug/899671/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863756] Re: check_gl_texture_size assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 ***
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863756 Title: check_gl_texture_size assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib /gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 *** To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/863756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863756] [NEW] check_gl_texture_size assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 ***
Public bug reported: Trying to look at display settings ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: libgnome-desktop-3-2 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 AssertionMessage: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 *** CrashCounter: 1 Date: Sat Oct 1 01:51:23 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta i386 (20110901) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size ProcEnviron: Signal: 6 SourcePackage: gnome-desktop3 StacktraceTop: __kernel_vsyscall () raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 Title: check_gl_texture_size assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 *** UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: gnome-desktop3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863756 Title: check_gl_texture_size assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib /gnome-desktop3/check_gl_texture_size: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x09930017 *** To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/+bug/863756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15442] Re: panels change their position between logins
This still occurs in 10.04 Lucid and 10.10 Maverick. I have just encountered it myself. I had deleted the top panel moved its contents to the bottom one, Windows-XP-style. I decided to revert to the GNOME style. I created a new one, positioned it at the top, and moved the menu, launch icons and clock to it. This worked fine until I rebooted, at which point, both panels revert to the top. If I go into Properties and try to move the task-switcher panel's position to bottom, it instantly reverts to top. If I use gconf- editor to do it, it moves until it autohides, at which point it snaps back to the top again. I'm amazed that in more than 3 or 4 years, this hasn't been fixed! -- panels change their position between logins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
Koen: that is interesting but I think you must have a different machine to me, as mine does not have an SD card reader. I have an SD to CF converter in its CF slot, but this makes no difference to suspend/resume, it just generates a 2-line error message when booting or resuming if no card is installed. -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350680] Re: IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation
Updated information as of Ubuntu 10.10. Even a fully-updated 10.10 system still displayed the same problem; if the machine was suspended or hibernated, it never resumed. When the system goes into sleep mode, the backlight of the display does not turn off unless the lid is closed or the lid-close sensor button in the hinge is depressed with a pen or screwdriver. However, adding nomodeset to the kernel parameters enables the machine to suspend and resume correctly, including hibernation. Unlike 10.04, in 10.10 the X server starts normally in 1024×768/16M colours and the machine is perfectly usable. I amended the following line by adding nomodeset to the end in /etc/default/grub: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset I then ran update-grub to enable the change. However, the nomodeset line means that the plymouth graphical loading screen no longer works. It is replaced with a text-based one. In the hope of at least running in the native resolution of the LCD and getting a smoother text loading screen, I added a vga mode parameter to the same line, as follows: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset vga=792 This not only worked and reset the console resolution to 1024×768, but it also re-enabled the graphical loading screen, which furthermore now appeared with the correct colour palette, removing the coloured fringes that had affected the default install. I then dropped the X screen from 16M colours to 65K colours, which gives a sharp increase in display performance enables me to use dual-head with an external monitor running at 1280×1024. I have documented how I did this in a blog post here: http://liam-on-linux.livejournal.com/20637.html I then amended the GRUB line so that the bootup screen mode was the same as the X one: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset vga=791 The result is that everything now works: graphical startup shutdown, suspend resume, hibernation, and a fast X display which supports dual- head operation. This workaround is entirely successful for me, but I don't know if it counts as closing the bug. -- IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
Updated information as of Ubuntu 10.10. Even a fully-updated 10.10 system still displayed the same problem; if the machine was suspended or hibernated, it never resumed. When the system goes into sleep mode, the backlight of the display does not turn off unless the lid is closed or the lid-close sensor button in the hinge is depressed with a pen or screwdriver. However, adding nomodeset to the kernel parameters enables the machine to suspend and resume correctly, including hibernation. Unlike 10.04, in 10.10 the X server starts normally in 1024×768/16M colours and the machine is perfectly usable. I amended the following line by adding nomodeset to the end in /etc/default/grub: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset I then ran update-grub to enable the change. However, the nomodeset line means that the plymouth graphical loading screen no longer works. It is replaced with a text-based one. In the hope of at least running in the native resolution of the LCD and getting a smoother text loading screen, I added a vga mode parameter to the same line, as follows: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset vga=792 This not only worked and reset the console resolution to 1024×768, but it also re-enabled the graphical loading screen, which furthermore now appeared with the correct colour palette, removing the coloured fringes that had affected the default install. I then dropped the X screen from 16M colours to 65K colours, which gives a sharp increase in display performance enables me to use dual-head with an external monitor running at 1280×1024. I have documented how I did this in a blog post here: http://liam-on-linux.livejournal.com/20637.html I then amended the GRUB line so that the bootup screen mode was the same as the X one: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash nomodeset vga=791 The result is that everything now works: graphical startup shutdown, suspend resume, hibernation, and a fast X display which supports dual- head operation. This workaround is entirely successful for me, but I don't know if it counts as closing the bug. -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350680] Re: IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation
Just to note that this is still happening in 10.10 (release version) on my Thinkpad X31 I have observed a related problem on a friend's Thinkpad R400 in 10.04. It appears to resume OK but the keyboard does not respond. -- IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629692] Re: unity-applications-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gee_list_list_iterator()
I am having this is something very like it too, on RC 10.10 final release. I am running an IBM Thinkpad X31. The entire desktop restarts if I even mouse over any icon in the dock, making it completely unusable. It is not even possible to logout; clicking on that menu causes a restart, too. As another sufferer has commented, I don't think X is restarting, but the whole WM desktop does. Open apps survive but as clicking on them causes a restart they are unusable. -- unity-applications-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gee_list_list_iterator() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629692 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623927] Re: package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory
No, it has not recurred and currently I am having no problems that I can attribute to it. All I can say is that both my Mozilla browsers are now very unstable, both Firefox and Seamonkey. Both regularly shut down with no warning. -- package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 623927] Re: package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory
I have not tried 10.10 yet, but if I have time before release, I will. -- package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623927] [NEW] package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc I did not notice a crash but the bug reporter tells me there was one! Firefox seems to have handled it gracefully. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.41-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Aug 25 10:59:35 2010 ErrorMessage: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) SourcePackage: vlc Title: package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623927] Re: package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517693/+files/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517694/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517695/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517696/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517697/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927/+attachment/1517698/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- package mozilla-plugin-vlc 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to install new version of `/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libvlcplugin.so': No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
On 12 August 2010 16:22, Jeremy Foshee 370...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated comments for quite some time. As a result this bug is being closed. If there is any more information I can add, please let me know. It still affects 10.04 as of the latest kernel release, and Mint 9 ditto. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
On 13 July 2010 05:36, Adam Felson 370...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On my thinkpad X31 uname -a: Linux thinkpad 2.6.32-24-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 09:22:14 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux It used to lockup after any attempt to suspend or hibernate. I've since added nomodeset to my kernel params and both mostly work now except that if I suspend, it'll lockup tight with the flashing capslock within a few hours. There's never anything in dmesg or /var/log/message. I'd collect additional data if I knew how. @Adam: that sounds like a positive step. I have already tried adding nomodeset to the kernel-params, but I found that when X started it came up at only half brightness - the fade in effect starts but never finishes. It was virtually impossible to use the machine in this state; I had to switch to a vconsole to undo the change. Did you have this and if so how did you get around it? -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: My IBM Thinkpad X31 has never hibernated successfully. On 8.04, both hibernate and sleep failed. On 8.10, sleep started working OK but hibernation just returned within seconds, with the machine never powering-off, rebooting or anything. In 9.04, it appears to go /into/ hibernation but it will not resume. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous hibernate and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: hibernate/resume InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 002: ID 1668:0441 Actiontec Electronics, Inc. [hex] IBM Integrated Bluetooth II Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: IBM 26723G0 Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=35f85a2b-68df-442e-bd94-3ca520bf5a33 ro splash vga=791 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.40-generic SourcePackage: linux Tags: resume hibernate Title: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure UserGroups: + --- + AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. + Architecture: i386 + AudioDevicesInUse: + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: liam 1309 F pulseaudio + CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Card0.Amixer.info: + Card hw:0 'I82801DBICH4'/'Intel 82801DB-ICH4 with AD1981B at irq 11' +Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1981B' +Components : 'AC97a:41445374' +Controls : 26 +Simple ctrls : 18 + Card29.Amixer.info: + Card hw:29 'ThinkPadEC'/'ThinkPad Console Audio Control at EC reg 0x30, fw 1QHT23WW-1.08' +Mixer name : 'ThinkPad EC 1QHT23WW-1.08' +Components : '' +Controls : 2 +Simple ctrls : 1 + Card29.Amixer.values: + Simple mixer control 'Console',0 +Capabilities: pvolume pvolume-joined pswitch pswitch-joined penum +Playback channels: Mono +Limits: Playback 0 - 14 +Mono: Playback 4 [29%] [on] + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=8f45cad4-4915-4d9c-bb94-d61fe312ca51 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta i386 (20100318) + Lsusb: + Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub + MachineType: IBM 26723G0 + Package: linux (not installed) + PccardctlIdent: + Socket 0: +no product info available + Socket 1: +no product info available + PccardctlStatus: + Socket 0: +no card + Socket 1: +no card + ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-21-generic root=UUID=27615c2a-86d2-4fb1-a34f-5c0d8751371a ro quiet splash + ProcEnviron: + LANG=en_GB.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.31-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 + Regression: No + RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34 + Reproducible: Yes + RfKill: + 0: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth + Soft blocked: yes + Hard blocked: no + Tags: ubuntu-une lucid suspend resume needs-upstream-testing + Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare + dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2005 + dmi.bios.vendor: IBM + dmi.bios.version: 1QET97WW (3.02 ) + dmi.board.name: 26723G0 + dmi.board.vendor: IBM + dmi.board.version: Not Available + dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information + dmi.chassis.type: 10 + dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM + dmi.chassis.version: Not Available + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIBM:bvr1QET97WW(3.02):bd09/22/2005:svnIBM:pn26723G0:pvrThinkPadX31:rvnIBM:rn26723G0:rvrNotAvailable:cvnIBM:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: + dmi.product.name: 26723G0 + dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X31 + dmi.sys.vendor: IBM ** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426816/AlsaDevices.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] ArecordDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426831/ArecordDevices.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] AplayDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426817/AplayDevices.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426872/BootDmesg.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Card0.Amixer.values.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426894/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426895/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426904/CurrentDmesg.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] IwConfig.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426905/IwConfig.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426897/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] PciMultimedia.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426910/PciMultimedia.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426907/Lspci.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426912/ProcInterrupts.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426920/ProcModules.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426922/UdevDb.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426925/UdevLog.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426930/WifiSyslog.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44426911/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
I hope that the additional information I've added is helpful. The problem still exists in 10.04 beta 2 (current as of today). The machine seems to go into sleep mode when I close the lid, but it never wakes up. On opening the lid, the fans and hard disk start up, the screen backlight illuminates, hard disk activity commences... and then nothing happens. It is unresponsive to keystrokes, the hard disk keeps accessing, and sits there in this state, unchanging, for up to several minutes. It does not respond to any keystrokes, including Ctrl-Alt-Del or the power button. The only recourse seems to be to hold down the power switch for several seconds, forcing a power-off. -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] Re: Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
A little further info: As of this afternoon's update, which I saw involved a netbook-launcher change, this problem is still occurring. Since the update of yesterday (15 Apr '10) I now have a graphical boot and shutdown sequence for the first time on 10.04, although early in the bootup, the colours are distorted with the logo, text progress buttons having a green fringe. However, the colour for fonts in the launcher is still black on a dark background. I see that this bug is marked incomplete; what further info do you need from me to make it complete? -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370935] Re: [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure
I have just also confirmed that problems also still affect hibernate resume in 10.04 as well as sleep (standby) resume. The system appears to hibernate normally - although with no onscreen progress indicators or anything it's hard to say. The sleep LED flashes, there is a lot of disk activity, then the keyboard controller is reset (all keyboard LEDs flash) and the machine powers off. On reboot, selecting 10.04 from GRUB, there is no onscreen indication that it is waking rather than booting, but there is lots of disk activity, followed by the screen flipping into graphics mode. However, only corrupted noise is displayed - a pattern of vertical red stripes - and the system becomes unresponsive. I had to power-off to recover the machine. -- [IBM 26723G0] hibernate/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350680] Re: IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation
This also seems to affect my Thinkpad X31 model 26723G0: Bug #370935 in 10.04 beta. It was also an issue on 9.04 and 9.10 in Linux Mint 7 8 (based on 9.04 9.10 respectively). -- IBM/Lenovo Laptops crash when waking up from hibernation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] Re: Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
Ah. I fear it might require similar or identical hardware. Perhaps, at the least, a machine with the same (rather old) ATI Mobility Radeon graphics chipset. I will look for the guest login option. What do you wish me to boot from USB to confirm this? -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] Re: Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
Thanks for the reply. No, I have not changed any font colours; all was on defaults. I am not sure what the gnome capplet is. I've looked in Appearance and the only font colours selection I can see is under Themes | Customise | Colours; is that where you mean? If so, everything in there is listed as black on white except Tooltips which is the reverse. -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] Re: Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
I already tried both Ambiance and Radiance - no difference. I am not sure that I have a guest account, but if I can find it or turn it on, I will try that. I have also tried logging in to normal GNOME, which works perfectly and looks fine. However, GNOME makes very sparing use of transparency effects text is usually displayed against a light background in windows and so on. In the netbook launcher, the main window is transparent but shaded darker than the wallpaper, and the highlighted selection is darker still, making text almost invisible. I have desktop effects set to none. I have tried enabling them (in normal rather than extra mode), and transparency in terminal windows of inactive title bars works, but it is too slow to be usable, so I disabled it again. It made no difference to font colours. -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] [NEW] Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: netbook-launcher Icon labels section button labels in netbook launcher are appearing in black. I am running Lucid (10.04) on my Thinkpad X-31, dual-booting with Mint 7 WinXP. It is current (`apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade -y` reports 0 available updates.) I have been running it ( updating every time I boot it) since before Beta 1 was officially released. Current version: Linux thinkpad-x31 2.6.32-19-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 31 17:46:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux It works it's significantly quicker than before, especially the graphics. I also tried the Netbook Remix launcher. It too works way better than it did in 9.04, where it was unusably slow; previously, since Ubuntu 8.x, I have had to disable DRI in xorg.conf to make X usably quick on this machine. The only snag is, all the fonts are black, which on a dark purple background is very hard to read. I am not sure if this is normal for the netbook remix. Other colours look OK, fonts in Firefox etc. have their normal colours - it's just all the buttons icon labels in the launcher. I've tried changing to the lighter Radiance theme. No difference. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: netbook-launcher 1:2.1.16-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Apr 11 11:21:37 2010 DkmsStatus: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/netbook-launcher InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta i386 (20100318) Lsusb: Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub MachineType: IBM 26723G0 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available Socket 1: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card Socket 1: no card ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-19-generic root=UUID=27615c2a-86d2-4fb1-a34f-5c0d8751371a ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: netbook-launcher dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2005 dmi.bios.vendor: IBM dmi.bios.version: 1QET97WW (3.02 ) dmi.board.name: 26723G0 dmi.board.vendor: IBM dmi.board.version: Not Available dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM dmi.chassis.version: Not Available dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnIBM:bvr1QET97WW(3.02):bd09/22/2005:svnIBM:pn26723G0:pvrThinkPadX31:rvnIBM:rn26723G0:rvrNotAvailable:cvnIBM:ct10:cvrNotAvailable: dmi.product.name: 26723G0 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X31 dmi.sys.vendor: IBM glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: i686 kernel: 2.6.32-19-generic ** Affects: netbook-launcher (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560598] Re: Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769063/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769064/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769065/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769066/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769067/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769068/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769069/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769070/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769071/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769072/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769073/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769074/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769075/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769077/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769078/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769079/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769080/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: monitors.xml.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769081/monitors.xml.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769082/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769084/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43769085/xkbcomp.txt -- Netbook-launcher fonts rendered in wrong colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149884] Re: initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version
I will try again if I can but this is a problematic machine with Linux and it's old slow now (PIII-750MHz, 320MB RAM, 20GB disk), so I seldom use it. I have Xubuntu 8.04.1 - I shall try that if time permits. -- initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112108] Re: Window maximizing and minimizing does not place windows back on their original screen
Due partly to this and partly to Bug #112107, I had to abandon Compiz and revert to plain 2D Metacity. I have not yet upgraded my main PC to Gutsy, so I've not tried it in 7.10 yet. My testbed PC is too old to support Compiz and I have had to remove Ubuntu from my notebook due to multiple hardware incompatibilities in the kernel. So I can't yet verify if this problem is fixed in 7.10. I will report back when I have tried it. -- Window maximizing and minimizing does not place windows back on their original screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112108 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149884] initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version
Public bug reported: This bug is the same problem as closed issues bug #8093 and bug #8289. It may have been fixed before - it worked in 6.06 - but it has reappeared and affects the 7.10 beta. My machine (IBM ThinkPad model i1200 Series 1161-93G, DVD-ROM, 320MB RAM, 20GB HD, latest BIOS) needs special kernel parameters to be passed to boot successfully. Ubuntu 6.06 and 6.06-1 worked if I edited the GRUB boot commands and passed the irqpoll parameter. If I did this to enable the machine to boot from CD, the installer picked up the parameter and included it in the installed system. 7.04 and 7.10 beta do not do this. The bare irqpoll parameter is no longer enough; after considerable experimentation, I have found that I now need to enter acpi=force irqpoll for a successful boot, but the installation program does not pick this up and add it to the installed system, resulting in an installation that will not boot. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149884] Re: initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version
This appears to be related to the problem in bug #31036 as well. I was not changing the VGA parameters, so the resolution to #31036 does not apply. -- initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149884] Re: initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version
The comment attached to bug #28102 about adding parameters after the terminal -- on the kernel line *may* apply. I can't readily test it; an installation on this machine takes 2-3 hours. I've not seen this documented anywhere else before; perhaps it needs to be more widely known? ** Description changed: - This bug is the same problem as closed bugs #8093 and #8289. It may have - been fixed before - it worked in 6.06 - but it has reappeared and - affects the 7.10 beta. + This bug is the same problem as closed issues bug #8093 and bug #8289. + It may have been fixed before - it worked in 6.06 - but it has + reappeared and affects the 7.10 beta. My machine (IBM ThinkPad model i1200 Series 1161-93G, DVD-ROM, 320MB RAM, 20GB HD, latest BIOS) needs special kernel parameters to be passed to boot successfully. Ubuntu 6.06 and 6.06-1 worked if I edited the GRUB boot commands and passed the irqpoll parameter. If I did this to enable the machine to boot from CD, the installer picked up the parameter and included it in the installed system. 7.04 and 7.10 beta do not do this. The bare irqpoll parameter is no longer enough; after considerable experimentation, I have found that I now need to enter acpi=force irqpoll for a successful boot, but the installation program does not pick this up and add it to the installed system, resulting in an installation that will not boot. -- initial kernel boot parameters are not picked up in installed version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149892] Re: duplicate parameters in grub boot entry
I discovered this trying to install the 7.10 beta. However, I previously tried and failed to install 7.04 on the same machine as well. I think that the problem I described was why I was unable to successfully get GRUB to boot the PC. The laptop is an IBM ThinkPad i1200 Series model 1161-93G, 20GB HD, DVD- ROM, 320MB RAM. -- duplicate parameters in grub boot entry https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149892] duplicate parameters in grub boot entry
Public bug reported: The default kernel entries in GRUB's menu.lst have parameters both on the end of the kernel line and as a separate line. For example, from my installed 7.04 system: [[ title Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.20-16-generic root(hd0,8) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-16-generic root=UUID=35065adf-6d54-4af8-bd91-0d0431429c1f ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.20-16-generic quiet savedefault ]] Note how quiet is on the end of the kernel line *and* on a line of its own after the initrd line. While trying to trace booting problems, I removed the line reading quiet, but still got a quiet boot, as there was a duplicate instruction on the kernel line as well. When I manually added parameters as a new line on the end of the entry, using GRUB interactively at boot time, that said nosplash acpi=force irqpoll, the machine consistently rebooted when I tried to boot. I think this is because my nosplash parameter conflicted with the splash parameter on the kernel line. Should such parameters be duplicated like this? It means that entries must be changed in 2 places to get a successful boot. Conflicting parameters seem to cause GRUB to reset the PC. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- duplicate parameters in grub boot entry https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112107] Re: Drag drop between Nautilus windows fails on dual-head setup
I have since tried disabling Compiz and this feature started working correctly again. It thus appears to be a problem with Compiz, at least when running in nVidia TwinHead mode. -- Drag drop between Nautilus windows fails on dual-head setup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112108] Window maximizing and minimizing does not place windows back on their original screen
Public bug reported: I am running a multihead system with 2 17 monitors, positioned left right. If I have multiple maximized windows, when a window is minimized to the taskbar and then restored - even if this is immediate - then the window does not return to the same screen. E.g. if I have a full-screen window on the left monitor, minimized it, it may reappear on the right monitor. This also occurs when switching between tasks with Alt-Tab - if I switch to an already visible window, it might instantly switch heads. This seems to require multiple maximized windows - at least two. I have not been able to determine if there's a pattern as to which screen windows will reappear on; it seems to be fairly random but there's about a 50% chance, every swap or ever minimize/maximize, that the window will reappear on the wrong monitor. Ubuntu 7.04, x86-32, clean install, fully updated AthlonXP 2800MHz, 1GB RAM, 80G IDE hard disk, 2y 10G drive dedicated to swap nVidia GeForce FX 5600 AGP with 256MB RAM nVidia proprietary drivers, installed using the Ubuntu restricted drivers tool Compiz desktop effects enabled ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Window maximizing and minimizing does not place windows back on their original screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112108 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
