[Bug 1941765] [NEW] Font styling makes Calc slow
Public bug reported: Tested on: Ubuntu 20.04, Libreoffice 6.4.7.2 Ubuntu 21.10, Libreoffice 7.1.5.2 A Calc spreadsheet with random text on few columns and roughly every other row BOLDED is very slow to open and edit. Removing all BOLDING from the document makes it fast again. Same effect can be achieved with font coloring. Likely other font styles too. Other side effects include File, Edit and Tools menubar menus being very slow to open. Test spreadsheet (~50kB, 4k rows) with both bolded and colored rows provided for testing. Takes about minute to load. File menu takes 10 seconds to open each time. The last good version without this considerable slowdown is Libreoffice 6.4.6. Opens in few seconds. Menus are immediate. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "test3.ods" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941765/+attachment/5520914/+files/test3.ods -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941765 Title: Font styling makes Calc slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1941765/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
It's not like setting MOZ_REQUIRE_SIGNING to false would allow running unsigned extensions outright. There is also about:config setting xpinstall.signatures.required, that is true by default and needs to be set false by the user before unsigned extensions can be installed. The about:config setting is behind a grave warning about security ramifications if tampered with. Still, if user attempts to install unsigned extension, they are met with another warning dialog and even after accepting that the extension is marked with big warning label about being unverified in the add-ons manager. There is no way user could install unsigned extension by mistake. And indeed this "security hole" has been around for the last 5 years, yet there appears to be no related exploits. The bug certainly does not mention of any. As mentioned, the official way around this is to install one of the Firefox versions that has MOZ_REQUIRE_SIGNING set to false on default. On Windows that might be reasonable. However, none of these are available in Ubuntus repositories. It is not big hassle to install them from Mozillas own sources, but those installations will be user specific, are not covered by the usual update system and are missing any distribution specific patches. The options left for Ubuntu users (or Linux distro users in general) are not reasonable. So that's my take on the reasonability of this. I was really hoping more balanced approach could be taken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
Oh that is sad information indeed, but thank you! Unfortunately none of the other versions can be found in the Ubuntu repositories, which means no updates through the regular channel and no distribution specific patches. And having to submit your personal extensions for review is just not OK! As a workaround I have started using a script to modify the omni.ja to set the MOZ_REQUIRE_SIGNING to false. It's a pain but I pray they do not "fix" that too. It would be even a bigger pain to have to build Firefox from scratch each time! I wonder if there is enough like minded persons within Ubuntu users, so that the MOZ_REQUIRE_SIGNING flag could be ACTUALLY set to false on Ubuntu builds. Where should one suggest this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
Unfortunately it seems that the latest builds still have this bug. Tested with: 91.0+build1-0ubuntu1 (Impish) 90.0.2+build1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Another unhappy user https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/just-log-in-to-say- farewell-to-firefox-after-about-20-years-bye-ff-extension/83463 Pingin Olivier Tilloy for some insight, please! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] [NEW] FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 18.04 FireFox 90.0+build1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Steps: - Set xpinstall.signatures.required to FALSE in about:config - Attempt to install UNSIGNED extension from file (Install Add-on From File...) in about:addons Expected: - FireFox warns about unverified add-on but ALLOWS installation. Actual result: - FireFox prevents the installation. Installing unsigned extensions used to work on all FireFox versions before 90. Related question https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/698053 There appears to be at least one other affected person https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/ootacl/unverified_addon_not_working_anymore_since/ ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762700] [NEW] Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity Unity-icon-theme is missing 32px and other alternative sizes for the new Launcher icons. This will cause the Launcher to revert back to Humanity icons when the Launcher icon size is changed to 32px (and possibly other sizes too). To replicate: Go to Unity plugin in ccsm and resize the Launcher icons to 32px. At this point the icons are likely to just scale down while keeping the theme. Go to Appearance Preferences. Switch to Clearlooks theme and then back to Ambiance. The icons should revert to Humanity icons right after the Appearance Preferences window is closed. The icons will get the unity-icon-theme back after login, but will revert to Humanity after some time or activity. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.8.8-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,compiztoolbox,regex,animation,expo,mousepoll,snap,text,vpswitch,wall,workarounds,grid,place,move,resize,imgpng,ezoom,session,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unitymtgrabhandles,unityshell,scaleaddon] CompositorRunning: compiz DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1024x600 edid-base64: AP///wAGr9IwAAESAQOAFg14CrmXkSgfUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBUBQAQEFYLCAYiDEA330YDwAg/gBBVU8KICAgICAgICAg/gBCMTAxQVcwMyBWMCAKADw= DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: Date: Sat Apr 16 15:01:05 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, i686: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022f] Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022f] LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) LiveMediaBuild_: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) LiveMediaBuild__: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) MachineType: eMachines eM250 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 ProcVersionSignature__: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/28/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Acer dmi.bios.version: V1.25 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: eM250 dmi.board.vendor: Acer dmi.board.version: V1.25 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer dmi.chassis.version: V1.25 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAcer:bvrV1.25:bd11/28/2009:svneMachines:pneM250:pvrV1.25:rvnAcer:rneM250:rvrV1.25:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrV1.25: dmi.product.name: eM250 dmi.product.version: V1.25 dmi.sys.vendor: eMachines version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu1 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug compiz-0.9 i386 natty running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762700 Title: Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762700] Re: Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762700 Title: Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762700] Re: Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme
Adding more explanatory image. ** Attachment added: comparison.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/762700/+attachment/2047176/+files/comparison.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762700 Title: Some Launcher icons revert to Humanity theme -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762758] [NEW] Menus flicker on Unity desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity Menus do not fade out nicely as they are closed, but abruptly and with white flicker (see attached video). This happens on Unity desktop but not on Classic. The computer is Acer D250 with Intel 945GME. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.8.8-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,compiztoolbox,regex,animation,expo,mousepoll,snap,text,vpswitch,wall,workarounds,grid,place,move,resize,imgpng,ezoom,session,staticswitcher,fade,scale,unitymtgrabhandles,unityshell,scaleaddon] CompositorRunning: compiz DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1024x600 edid-base64: AP///wAGr9IwAAESAQOAFg14CrmXkSgfUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBUBQAQEFYLCAYiDEA330YDwAg/gBBVU8KICAgICAgICAg/gBCMTAxQVcwMyBWMCAKADw= DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: Off modes: edid-base64: Date: Sat Apr 16 16:30:18 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: natty DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: bcmwl, 5.100.82.38+bdcom, 2.6.38-8-generic, i686: installed GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022f] Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] Device [1025:022f] LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) LiveMediaBuild_: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) LiveMediaBuild__: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110413) MachineType: eMachines eM250 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- ProcVersionSignature_: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 ProcVersionSignature__: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Renderer: Unknown SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/28/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Acer dmi.bios.version: V1.25 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: eM250 dmi.board.vendor: Acer dmi.board.version: V1.25 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer dmi.chassis.version: V1.25 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAcer:bvrV1.25:bd11/28/2009:svneMachines:pneM250:pvrV1.25:rvnAcer:rneM250:rvrV1.25:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrV1.25: dmi.product.name: eM250 dmi.product.version: V1.25 dmi.sys.vendor: eMachines version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.4+bzr20110415-0ubuntu1 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.23-1ubuntu6 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.10.2-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.0-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.14.0-4ubuntu7 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110107+b795ca6e-0ubuntu7 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug compiz-0.9 i386 natty running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762758 Title: Menus flicker on Unity desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762758] Re: Menus flicker on Unity desktop
** Attachment added: menuflicker.ogv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762758/+attachment/2047415/+files/menuflicker.ogv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762758 Title: Menus flicker on Unity desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756960] [NEW] compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sigc::signal_base::impl()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unity Compiz (or Unity, I'm not sure) crashes every time any of the Compiz plugins is disabled or enabled with CCSM. It manages to restart itself though. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: unity 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: i386 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Mon Apr 11 02:23:13 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Beta i386 (20110330) ProcCmdline: compiz ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x61fe3d _ZNK4sigc11signal_base4implEv+29: mov 0x4(%edi),%esi PC (0x0061fe3d) ok source 0x4(%edi) (0x007c) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! destination %esi ok SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: unity StacktraceTop: sigc::signal_base::impl() const () from /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 sigc::signal_base::connect(sigc::slot_base const) () from /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 UnityScreen::UnityScreen(CompScreen*) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libunityshell.so CompPlugin::VTableForScreenAndWindowUnityScreen, UnityWindow::initScreen(CompScreen*) () from /usr/lib/compiz/libunityshell.so CompManager::initPlugin(CompPlugin*) () Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sigc::signal_base::impl() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash ayatana-scrollbar i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756960 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sigc::signal_base::impl() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756960] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sigc::signal_base::impl()
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756960 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sigc::signal_base::impl() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741370] Re: aptd crashed with OSError in _copy_io_master(): [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
In my case the crash was preceded by this: Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic linux-image-generic linux-generic etn plnxiae263--eei 263-.1 . unn emd paeiirms eeaig/otiir.m-..88gnrccyteu:WRIG aldt eetcnncldvc faf rpstp ANN:cudntdtriero eiefo ecftbEaiig/t/enlpsis..rnprs xctn eckre/otntddm ..88gnrc/otvlnz263--eei *dm:rnigat ntlainsriefrkre ..88gnrc 8G * bml(.0.23+do).[0 7G K]rnprs xctn eckre/otntdiirmstos263--eei bo/miu-..88gnrcrnprs xctn eckre/otntdnii-omn263--eei bo/miu-..88gnrcrnprs xctn eckre/otntdp-tl ..88gnrc/otvlnz263--eei u-at:eeuig/t/enlpsis./paentfe ..88gnrc/otvlnz263--eei u-at:eeuig/t/enlpsis./zudt-rb263--eei bo/miu-..88gnrc/s/bngu-rb:err antsa af' u-at:/t/enlpsis./zudt-rbeie ihrtr oe1Fie opoes/t/enlpsis. t/a/i/pgif/iu-mg-..88gnrcpsis ie11.dk:errpoesn iu-mg-..88gnrc(-ofgr) sbrcs ntle otisalto citrtre ro xtsau pg eednypolm rvn ofgrto flnxiaegnrc lnxiaegnrcdpnso iu-mg-..88gnrc oee: Pcaelnxiae263--eei sntcniue e.dk:errpoesn iu-mg-eei -cniue: eednypolm evn nofgrddk:dpnec rbespeetcniuaino iu-eei: iu-eei eed nlnxiaegnrc( ..882) oee: Pcaelnxiaegnrci o ofgrdyt pg ro rcsiglnxgnrc(-ofgr) dpnec rbes-laigucniue The crash happened while trying to report above problem. That report is unfortunately now gone and that is only thing left. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741370 Title: aptd crashed with OSError in _copy_io_master(): [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683170] Re: should be possible to display only the launchers on the current workspace
I agree with Sebastien Bacher, Bazon and Garthhh. Launcher should not show icons for all open programs but only for those in the current workspace. That would help to keep the Launcher tidy and simple to use and also be more consistent with App Spread and Alt-Tab. Best way/time to present all the open windows in the Launcher would be to do that only in the overhead (Expo) mode. That would be very intuitive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683170 Title: should be possible to display only the launchers on the current workspace -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659478] [NEW] Firefox javascript cssText selector list gets reordered
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
I was trying to do a little javascript script to modify CSS, when I
bumped into this little problem/bug:
document.styleSheets[i].cssRules[j].cssText
The above attribute seems to give reordered selector list if the
selectors are not delimetered with whitespaces.
Example 1 (selectors delimetered with whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Example 2 (no whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass#someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #someID.someClass { color:red; }
In Example 2 the someClass and the someID have changed order. This probably
should not happen.
Here is a another example to give some sense of pattern:
Example 3:
In CSS file:
.class1:hover.class2#id1#id2:hover.class3#id3 { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #id1#id2#id3.class1.class2.class3:hover:hover {
color:red; }
As can be seen, the hover pseudo classes are completely borked. So I
guess this is a bug.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 12 22:57:15 2010
FirefoxPackages:
firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-gnome-support 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-branding 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
abroswer N/A
abrowser-branding N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug csstext firefox javascript lucid selectors
--
Firefox javascript cssText selector list gets reordered
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659478] Re: Firefox javascript cssText selector list gets reordered
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478/+attachment/1689302/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478/+attachment/1689303/+files/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profile_secondary_pluginreg.dat.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478/+attachment/1689304/+files/profile_secondary_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478/+attachment/1689305/+files/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox javascript cssText selector list gets reordered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659478] Re: Firefox javascript cssText selector list gets reordered
If someone could tell me how to format the description... Meanwhile you
can read this:
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firefox
I was trying to do a little javascript script to modify CSS, when I
bumped into this little problem/bug:
document.styleSheets[i].cssRules[j].cssText
The above attribute seems to give reordered selector list if the
selectors are not delimetered with whitespaces.
+ /br
Example 1 (selectors delimetered with whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Example 2 (no whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass#someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #someID.someClass { color:red; }
In Example 2 the someClass and the someID have changed order. This probably
should not happen.
Here is a another example to give some sense of pattern:
Example 3:
In CSS file:
.class1:hover.class2#id1#id2:hover.class3#id3 { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #id1#id2#id3.class1.class2.class3:hover:hover {
color:red; }
As can be seen, the hover pseudo classes are completely borked. So I
guess this is a bug.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 12 22:57:15 2010
FirefoxPackages:
firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-gnome-support 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-branding 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
abroswer N/A
abrowser-branding N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firefox
I was trying to do a little javascript script to modify CSS, when I
bumped into this little problem/bug:
document.styleSheets[i].cssRules[j].cssText
The above attribute seems to give reordered selector list if the
selectors are not delimetered with whitespaces.
+ /br
+ /br
/br
Example 1 (selectors delimetered with whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Example 2 (no whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass#someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #someID.someClass { color:red; }
In Example 2 the someClass and the someID have changed order. This probably
should not happen.
Here is a another example to give some sense of pattern:
Example 3:
In CSS file:
.class1:hover.class2#id1#id2:hover.class3#id3 { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #id1#id2#id3.class1.class2.class3:hover:hover {
color:red; }
As can be seen, the hover pseudo classes are completely borked. So I
guess this is a bug.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Oct 12 22:57:15 2010
FirefoxPackages:
firefox 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-gnome-support 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
firefox-branding 3.6.10+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
abroswer N/A
abrowser-branding N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: firefox
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firefox
I was trying to do a little javascript script to modify CSS, when I
bumped into this little problem/bug:
document.styleSheets[i].cssRules[j].cssText
The above attribute seems to give reordered selector list if the
selectors are not delimetered with whitespaces.
- /br
- /br
- /br
Example 1 (selectors delimetered with whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: .someClass #someID { color:red; }
Example 2 (no whitespaces):
In CSS file: .someClass#someID { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #someID.someClass { color:red; }
In Example 2 the someClass and the someID have changed order. This probably
should not happen.
Here is a another example to give some sense of pattern:
Example 3:
In CSS file:
.class1:hover.class2#id1#id2:hover.class3#id3 { color:red; }
Above code outputs: #id1#id2#id3.class1.class2.class3:hover:hover {
color:red; }
As can be seen, the hover pseudo
[Bug 584483] Re: Audacious GTK UI bug
Well, even though this bug never got confirmed, it is now fixed in the latest version that comes with the Maverick Meerkat beta. ** Changed in: audacious (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Audacious GTK UI bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 610930] [NEW] Nautilus crashes when trying to form preview of malformed SVG image.
Public bug reported: Symptoms: Nautilus crashes when trying to form preview of malformed SVG image e.g. when opening the containing folder. If the image is placed on the Desktop, Nautilus will go into crash-restart loop. Culprit: Malformed SVG file that has style attribute containing zero length property value. Few examples below: First perfectly OK svg file. - example.svg - WORKING 8 (file cutline) svg circle style=fill:red cx=100 cy=100 r=100/ /svg 8 Removed the red to make zero length fill-value. Will crash nautilus. - example.svg - NONWORKING -8 svg circle style=fill: cx=100 cy=100 r=100/ /svg 8 Added whitespace to make fill-value non zero length. This works again, although the circle will be completely black. - example.svg - WORKING 8 svg circle style=fill: cx=100 cy=100 r=100/ /svg 8 Added standard delimiter right after the :. Fill-value is again zero- length and causes Nautilus to crash. - example.svg - NONWORKING -8 svg circle style=fill:; cx=100 cy=100 r=100/ /svg 8 So it is pretty clear that style attribute containing zero length property value will cause troubles. Hopefully this will help to find and fix the bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: librsvg2-2 2.26.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jul 28 19:01:47 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: librsvg ** Affects: librsvg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Nautilus crashes when trying to form preview of malformed SVG image. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 610930] Re: Nautilus crashes when trying to form preview of malformed SVG image.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52643597/Dependencies.txt -- Nautilus crashes when trying to form preview of malformed SVG image. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584483] Re: Audacious GTK UI bug
Nothing has changed since I posted the bug. Audacious hasn't been updated since and the bug persists. -- Audacious GTK UI bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584483] Re: Audacious GTK UI bug
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: audacious While using Audacious's GTK UI: In Playback menu selectable properties eg. Repeat, Suffle, No playlist Advance and Stop after Current Song will lose their selected mark on player restart but the property will still have effect. After said restart clicking the property once will toggle the enabled mark visible and set the property enabled even though it was allready enabled. Subsequent toggles will work as expected. To repeat: -Start Audacity -In Playback, select Repeat and No playlist Advance. Markings will appear to show that they are selected. -Restart Audacity -In Playback notice that Repeat and No playlist Advance have no marks on their left side. -Try playing a song in a playlist. Playlist will not advance and the song repeats. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 23 11:19:49 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: audacious + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) + NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx + Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE=en + LANG=en_GB.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 + Tags: lucid + Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 + UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50640572/Dependencies.txt -- Audacious GTK UI bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596602] [NEW] audacious crossfader preferences input fields hang
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacious This bug affects only Crossfade Plugin. In File - Preferences - Audio - Crossfade Plugin Preferences (first select plugin) - Crossfader (tab) clearing any of the input fields will cause the Audacious to hang with high cpu usage. It is possible to change those values only by gradually changing the value, so that the field will never be completely clear. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 20 19:45:15 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: audacious ** Affects: audacious (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- audacious crossfader preferences input fields hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596602] Re: audacious crossfader preferences input fields hang
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50641495/Dependencies.txt -- audacious crossfader preferences input fields hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596604] [NEW] Audacious hangs on PAUSE if using crossfade plugin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacious This bug affects only Crossfade Plugin. While using Crossfade Plugin, if you play a song, PAUSE it, and then start a another song from the playlist, the Audacious will hang. More precisely: Only double clicking to start another song (although it won't start) will not hang the Audacious instantly. After that you are still able to e.g. open the menus. Only after you touch any of the controls will the Audacious hang for good. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 20 19:52:50 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: audacious ** Affects: audacious (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Audacious hangs on PAUSE if using crossfade plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596604] Re: Audacious hangs on PAUSE if using crossfade plugin
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50641766/Dependencies.txt -- Audacious hangs on PAUSE if using crossfade plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596606] [NEW] Audacious's Crossfade Plugin has mixed preferences
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacious This bug affects only Crossfade Plugin. In File - Preferences - Audio - Crossfade Plugin Preferences (first select plugin)- Crossfader (tab) combobox Set parameter for: has apparently two options mixed. Manual stop and End of playlist seem to have the effect the other should have. For example changing Fade out: Length in End of playlist will affect the crossfade length after pressing the stop button. And changing Fade out: Length in Manual stop will affect the crossfading at the end of the last song of the playlist. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 20 19:57:38 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: audacious ** Affects: audacious (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Audacious's Crossfade Plugin has mixed preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596606] Re: Audacious's Crossfade Plugin has mixed preferences
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50641924/Dependencies.txt -- Audacious's Crossfade Plugin has mixed preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584483] [NEW] Audacious GTK UI bug
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacious While using Audacious's GTK UI: In Playback menu selectable properties eg. Repeat, Suffle, No playlist Advance and Stop after Current Song will lose their selected mark on player restart but the property will still have effect. After said restart clicking the property once will toggle the enabled mark visible and set the property enabled even though it was allready enabled. Subsequent toggles will work as expected. To repeat: -Start Audacity -In Playback, select Repeat and No playlist Advance. Markings will appear to show that they are selected. -Restart Audacity -In Playback notice that Repeat and No playlist Advance have no marks on their left side. -Try playing a song in a playlist. Playlist will not advance and the song repeats. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: audacious 2.3-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 23 11:19:49 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: audacious ** Affects: audacious (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Audacious GTK UI bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584483] Re: Audacious GTK UI bug
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48958582/Dependencies.txt -- Audacious GTK UI bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429246] Re: Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate
I have also EasyNote MX65 laptop with PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] wlan card under my care. Symptoms are as with previous posters. NetworkManager can see all of the APs, but can't connect to them. See attached logs for details. There is also the difference that I haven't tried with encrypted connection. So for me this happends on unencrypted connections. This affects both Karmic and Lucid beta1. ** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43256886/lspci-vvnn.log -- Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429246] Re: Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43256950/dmesg.log -- Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429246] Re: Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate
** Attachment added: kern.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43257006/kern.log -- Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429246] Re: Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate
** Attachment added: syslog.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43257027/syslog.log -- Wireless problem: my card intel 3945 abg doesn't connect with my router, it continues to say me to re-authenticate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429246 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317094] Re: meta bug to collect lshal touchscreen info
Lshal for old Fujitsu LifeBook B2154. The touchscreen has previously worked with Conans evtouch drivers. Xubuntus calibrate_touchscreen utility however doesn't recognize the device as evtouch capable device. ** Attachment added: evtouch_hal.out http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38030250/evtouch_hal.out -- meta bug to collect lshal touchscreen info https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
