[Bug 989595] Re: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989595 Title: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/989595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989595] [NEW] package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: I am trying to remove all lingering configurations. Fresh upgrade 11.10-12.04 this morning (no alpha/beta/RC packages installed). ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: fglrx-updates (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu6 AptOrdering: fglrx-updates: Purge Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 27 12:37:48 2012 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: fglrx-installer-updates Title: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-27 (0 days ago) ** Affects: fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989595 Title: package fglrx-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/989595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871185] Re: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871185 Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/871185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871185] [NEW] blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: General update on Oneiric, morning of 09 october. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl fglrx ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.0.0-12-generic Date: Sun Oct 9 10:40:56 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 SourcePackage: blcr Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-09-06 (32 days ago) ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871185 Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1: blcr kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/871185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767653] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 20 22:21:56 2011 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-23 (28 days ago) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767653 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767653] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767653 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767651] [NEW] package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 20 22:21:56 2011 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-23 (28 days ago) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767651 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767651] Re: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767651 Title: package apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767650] [NEW] package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport Updating as of today 20 April, 22:23 Greenwhich+1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 20 22:21:57 2011 ErrorMessage: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: apport Title: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-23 (28 days ago) ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767650 Title: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767650] Re: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 767498 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767498 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767650 Title: package apport-gtk 1.20.1-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: problemi con le dipendenze - lasciato non configurato -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 758625] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Update on the 12th of April. All packages up to date. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 12 11:57:36 2011 ErrorMessage: blcr kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 SourcePackage: blcr Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-23 (19 days ago) ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758625 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 758625] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758625 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640452] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Title says it all. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:21 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.31.92-0ubuntu1 gvfs 1.6.3-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 640452] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593182/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593188/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593190/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593193/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593194/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 640449] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Since yesterday (15/9), when I tried to upgrade (Maverick Beta), samba installation has been broken for me. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:21 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.31.92-0ubuntu1 gvfs 1.6.3-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 640449] Re: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593142/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593143/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593145/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593147/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593149/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 640459] [NEW] package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: checkbox Failed update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:21 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: checkbox Title: package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640459] Re: package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593246/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593247/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593248/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459/+attachment/1593249/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package checkbox-gtk 0.10.3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640459 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640458] [NEW] package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: man-db Failed update. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: man-db 2.5.7-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:20 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) SourcePackage: man-db Title: package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: man-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640458] Re: package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593242/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593243/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593244/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458/+attachment/1593245/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package man-db 2.5.7-4 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640458 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640452] [NEW] package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Title says it all. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:21 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.31.92-0ubuntu1 gvfs 1.6.3-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640452] Re: package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593182/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593188/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593190/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593193/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452/+attachment/1593194/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- package winbind 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640449] [NEW] package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Since yesterday (15/9), when I tried to upgrade (Maverick Beta), samba installation has been broken for me. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-21.31-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AptOrdering: man-db: Configure checkbox-gtk: Configure samba: Configure winbind: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 16 10:48:21 2010 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) RelatedPackageVersions: nautilus 1:2.31.92-0ubuntu1 gvfs 1.6.3-0ubuntu2 SambaClientRegression: Yes SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package maverick -- package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640449] Re: package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593142/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593143/+files/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593145/+files/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593147/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: SambaInstalledVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449/+attachment/1593149/+files/SambaInstalledVersions.txt -- package samba 2:3.5.4~dfsg-1ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450795] Re: trackerd causes the death of pdftotext and odt2txt processes with signal 24
As far as I reckon, no. I have not seen this problem in a while. -- trackerd causes the death of pdftotext and odt2txt processes with signal 24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414794] Re: ibus-x11 crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main()
I have been running into this bug for a while now. Every session start, I see apport signaling that ibus has crashed. Currently, the only anomaly I observe is that I cannot absolutely choose a desktop background in gnome, and end up with a plain grey background (same color as the panel). ** Changed in: ibus (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- ibus-x11 crashed with signal 5 in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
MM. Forgot to follow up this bug after a while. Taylor, I discovered that the message indicated that the swap was corrupted (probably due to some kind of error or maybe disk damage, I can't tell that from here ;-) ). You should format your swap, and correct the right configuration files in etc (fstab and another one) so that they point to the newly formatted swap (report the uuid, visible for example askign for more information about the swap in Gparted). Good luck! -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 451112] Re: pdftotext crashed with signal 24 in Lexer::getObj()
I fear I cant', sorry, it is a rather big file (over 100 Mb). Anything else I could do? -- pdftotext crashed with signal 24 in Lexer::getObj() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446653] Re: Random crash
I beg your pardon, but I think the right package is nvidia-glx-185, not 180 :) -- Random crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446653] [NEW] Random crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Xorg crashed during a normal session, up for less than 12 hours. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Oct 8 21:14:51 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-11-generic root=UUID=0e7d1dc3-b910-410f-96ea-1103f1edbfdd ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.38-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1ubuntu1 libdrm2 2.4.13-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.8.1-1ubuntu3 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090825.fc74e119-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic i686 dmi.bios.date: 06/13/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A17 dmi.board.name: 0XD720 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA17:bd06/13/2007:svnDellInc.:pnMM061:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0XD720:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: MM061 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. fglrx: Not loaded system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: i686kernel: 2.6.31-11-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Random crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446653] Re: Random crash
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320466/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320467/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320468/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320469/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320470/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320472/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320473/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320474/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320475/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320476/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320477/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320478/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320484/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320485/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320486/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320487/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320488/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320489/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320490/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33320491/xkbcomp.txt -- Random crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349330] Re: Cannot receive files over bluetooth: install gnome-user-share by default
Does this bug still affect Karmic? -- Cannot receive files over bluetooth: install gnome-user-share by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269904] Re: Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid
Rob_H is absolutely right. I came across the solution yesterday night, and lo and behold, it is finally perfect! :-) -- Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 332414] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 Ditto. It was an unpleasant surprise, especially because most of these notifications concern simply change of status and merges. Il giorno ven, 12/06/2009 alle 05.49 +, Rajeev Sharma ha scritto: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 What the hell you guys are doing. I have got more than 150 mails on this since morning. Why are you filling my inbox with junk mails? I have reported a bug doesn't mean you can fill my inbox with spam mails. -- Rajeev Sharma Sr. Software Engineer Yahoo! Inc +91 9741540243 Sent from iPhone On 12-Jun-09, at 8:57 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@canonical.com wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 277906 compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV (multiple causes and hardware) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 131679 Crash inside doPoll() -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332414 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug (via bug 131679). -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]
Is there some critical information which is missing from this bug report and which I failed to provide? -- [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356059] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 Public bug reported: See duplicate ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.40 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic root=UUID=623d8d5b-eefe-46c3-a499-18fcfd8b054e ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.40-generic SourcePackage: linux Tags: kernel-oops Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 kernel-oops -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356059] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854365/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854366/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854371/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854382/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854383/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854384/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854385/OopsText.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854386/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854387/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24854388/ProcModules.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 351220 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
After some observations, I think I can say this bug happens after resuming from suspend. A typical symptom is the impossibility of actually act as administrator. See new duplicate. -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354320] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 Public bug reported: Duplicate of bug 351220. Opening a new one to add the extra information, after latest kernel update. Thought it was gone, I was mistaken, it is just less reproducible. :( Running an ext4 filesystem. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.39 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic root=UUID=623d8d5b-eefe-46c3-a499-18fcfd8b054e ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.39-generic SourcePackage: linux Tags: kernel-oops Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 kernel-oops -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354320] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 351220 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738290/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738291/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738292/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738293/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738294/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738295/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738297/OopsText.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738299/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738301/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24738303/ProcModules.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 351220 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
Happened again. It is just less consistent. I added the new debug information to the duplicate of this bug. -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]
Ok, in order: 1- Bug hit at resume time 2- Not consistently reproducible, or frequent - I suspend and hibernate many times a day, and this bug affects the system seldom, at resuming from suspend. In the last 3 days it occurred twice, and a reasonable estimate would be that in the meantime I suspended about 20 times with 2 or 3 reboots in between. 3- Suspend in general functions, and has functioned on previous kernel releases too (as far back as Hardy I think, at least) 4- Last time around I had flashing caps lock, I do not remember for other times though 5- I will add that I had multiple suspended this machine when the panic occurred last time. I hope this helps. -- [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
I consistently received this bug notifications every time I booted up, but after today's kernel upgrade the warning has disappeared. Thanks to whoever fixed it :-) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351204] [NEW] [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]
Public bug reported: I (stupidly) re-inserted the CD-tray just one second after having started up the suspend test script (checkbox). ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and prevented it from resuming properly. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume Failure: suspend/resume InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic root=UUID=623d8d5b-eefe-46c3-a499-18fcfd8b054e ro quiet splash ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apportcheckresume ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.38-generic SourcePackage: linux Tags: resume suspend Title: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] UserGroups: ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 resume suspend -- [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351204] Re: [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia]
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492014/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492015/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492017/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492018/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492019/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492020/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492021/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492022/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492023/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492024/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492025/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: StressLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492026/StressLog.txt -- [Dell Inc. MM061] suspend/resume failure [non-free: nvidia] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492451/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492452/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492453/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492454/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492455/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492456/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492457/OopsText.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492458/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492459/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24492460/ProcModules.txt -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351220] [NEW] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104
Public bug reported: Testing Suspend-resume ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops MachineType: Dell Inc. MM061 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.28-11-generic root=UUID=623d8d5b-eefe-46c3-a499-18fcfd8b054e ro quiet splash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.38-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 -- BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00100104 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278488] Re: Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access
The problem was still there last time I tried in Intrepid. I will be able to verify it tomorrow. I have just enabled the ppa archive, so next time I will be reporting I will be using the most up-to-date version available there. -- Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308334] Re: firestarter and samba not working together
This also happens while using Gufw. I had to shut the firewall down in order to get samba working again. I will try to see if these lines can help solve the problem permanently, thanks. -- firestarter and samba not working together https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291511] [NEW] Nautilus-gksu should be included by default in Ubuntu; better yet, it should be merged with nautilus package
Public bug reported: This is obviously a wish. Argument pro-inclusion: right now users have no way but resorting to command-line to open a file or a folder as super-user. This can be cirvumvented by using cli, of course, but it is far form an ideal solution. It is obviously a risk to give such a tool in the hands of the user by default, but I think it is worth the risk. It is only a hassle, and advanced computer users who are however still learning the ropes in Ubuntu might be very annoyed, considering the provided solution is not obvious. As specified in the title, the best solution in my opinion would be to just include the script in the core nautilus package. After all, it is arguably a core functionality of the file manager, and having it ready at system setup makes just sense. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus-gksu should be included by default in Ubuntu; better yet, it should be merged with nautilus package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291511 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)
Again sorry for a me not post; using a 64 bit kernel here I have no problems. Cannot say for a 32 bit kernel though. You can find my lspci output in earlier comments. Il giorno ven, 17/10/2008 alle 13.23 +, Tim Gardner ha scritto: The i3945 part of this bug is a red herring. It also happens with an ipw2200 on a Thinkpad T42 (bug #284406). I'm wondering if the problem is hardware related. Can anyone confirm this hang using a 64 bit kernel? -- [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)
Not very useful, but I'd like to add a I am NOT affected by this bug comment. I use a Dell Inspiron 6400, Nvidia Driver, IWL3945, and I have been using Intrepid both from live cd and as my default OS for two weeks now. I have never had any problem at boot time, and actually this driver is at its best ever. If you need any data to understand why this model is not affected, please ask. -- [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions
There is a hackish solution for this, without having to go into the fstab, at least in Intrepid. THIS ONLY WORKS WITH INTERNAL NTFS DRIVES. First, mount the ntfs drive by clicking it in Nautilus. Once you've done this, go to computer:/// in nautilus, right click on the drive, and go into the drive section, mount settings. There, on the mount options, add uid=1000 without commas. Unmount and remount using nautilus. If you get errors the first time, just use dolphin to mount cleanly, unmount, second time it should work like a charm. And yeah, nautilus at this is far worse than dolphin. Rant: another thing which makes me wanting to switch to KDE4 for good, ASAP. -- Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 263059] Re: [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?)
Neither do I actually; I have not experienced this bug either with nv driver or the nvidia one. I am attaching here my lspci -nn. As for the kernel version, I am using the last one provided, which is 2.6.27-7-generic. I have all the available updates repositories enabled. Il giorno gio, 16/10/2008 alle 16.13 +, Geek87 ha scritto: Hi, I'm experiencing the same bug with my ASUS F3JC laptop wich is equiped with an ipw3945 card too. I don't think the graphic card has something to see with this bug since I've a nVIDIA and the bug seems to happen with Intel and Ati cards as well. I don't know if this is important but I don't remember to have had this bug witht the live cd of the beta which I booted a lot of times. ** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18613900/lspci.txt -- [regression] 2.6.27-7 sometimes fails to boot (iwl3945 issue?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
I confirm the bug on an amd64 box. Hope you get it solved soon (and wahoo for the investigation above :) ) -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 262152] Re: brings up both wired and wireless interfaces; hard to pick just one through the UI
I think bug 278485 is related. NM seems in general unable to handle well more than one connection at a time. -- brings up both wired and wireless interfaces; hard to pick just one through the UI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 278488] Re: Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access
This has all been verified with Hardy. If the problem with my wireless network will go on until friday, I will be able to test this also with Intrepid. Step 1: I connect to the house wireless network, which currently provides local access only, using NM 0.7 Step 2: Still using NM 0.7, I connect to a GSM network using a Vodafone modem. This network provides Internet access. Result: NM 0.7 is now connected to both Networks, the tray icon displays the connected to wireless network status. Actual result: NM is not able to understand if the network provides internet or local only access. Moreover, it uses the wireless network connection by default over the GSM one. The net result is that while the wireless network is activated, I cannot access the web (even if the system IS connected to the internet via GSM). This applies to all Ubuntu programs, from cli to graphical ones. Expected result: since only one of the two networks provides internet access, I would expect NM to understand which one does, and use that network to connect to the internet. E.g. under Windows Vista the connection manager is able to understand which networks provide internet access and which local only, and uses the right one. I hope it is sufficiently clear. :-) -- Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
And *drums roll* it is finally over! I am happily writing this comment using a Beta CD, connected to the campus wireless network. Kudos and thanks to everyone who helped solve this heinous bug! ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278485] [NEW] If Ubuntu is connected to more than one network (e.g. GSM and wireless) but only GSM has internet access, OS is unable to access internet. NM version 0.7.
Public bug reported: Using NM 0.7 in Hardy (via ppa). I stumbled upon this bug as I am currently without DSL access and have to resort to my GSM connection (through a vodafon modem). The wireless network also allows me to access other computers in the network, so even without internet access it can be useful. NM is able to handle both connections flawlessly, one at a time. However, if I try to stay connected to both, I am unable to have internet access. Considering that the tray icon status indicates connection to the wireless network, I am inclined to think that NM considers the wireless network more reliable by default and tries to connect to the internet ONLY through it. As this program manages all connections in the OS, this means that every program (including even cli ones such as ping and traceroute) try to reach the net only using the wireless, and local only, network. As soon as I disable wireless access, I am able to reach the web - even if the modem had been connected to the GSM network all the time. This could stem from the fact that AFAIK NM is unable to determine if a connection is local only or instead provides internet access. Desired behaviour: the same I get in Windows Vista. Its connection manager is able to determine whether a connection is local only or provides internet access (maybe pinging some servers or the DNS server?). Moreover, if I connect to two networks at the same time, as in the example above, it can correctly determine which one is functional. Therefore, the user is able to stay connected to more than one network at a time and still have internet access. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- If Ubuntu is connected to more than one network (e.g. GSM and wireless) but only GSM has internet access, OS is unable to access internet. NM version 0.7. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278488] [NEW] Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager As in description. My DSL currently does not work, so the access my wireless network provides in local-only. NM 0.7 (via ppa) is unable to discriminate the two statuses. Release used: Hardy .1 Desired behaviour: as in Windows, where the connection manager is able to determine if the connection is local only or not. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Network Manager 0.7 is unable to determine if the connection is local only or instead provides internet access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
Dear Andy, I am trying this out tomorrow. If it functions, let me just tell you that - you're DA MAN!! :-) I've been plagued by this bug for so long that it seems forever right now. Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 15.41 +, Andy ha scritto: Seems I found the solution to my problem here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/272407 -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
I would have thought it this way if the driver was completely non-functional (as it was, see the other bug I was signaling). However, the driver does function using wpa_supplicant from the command line, so the bug is likely not in the driver or wpa_supplicant. Please refer also to bug 209602 and the bugzilla entry http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1507 I am also attaching the output of lspci. I think the line you required is this: 0b:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) Thanks for the attention. Il giorno gio, 02/10/2008 alle 22.22 +, Alexander Sack ha scritto: Luke12, this looks like a bug in iwl3945 driver or wpasupplicant maybe. On another front: what _wired_ chipset/driver are you using? NM spits out 'NULL(info.linux.driver)' which usually means that the driver has a bug :) ** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18155870/lspci -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
Still not solved in Beta. Tested both on Hardy via ppa and a 64-bit Intrepid live. -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
Ok, here is the syslog (produced according the rules provided inside the guide). It was produced in Hardy, up-to-date compat wireless driver and NM 0.7. I will try to make the same for Intrepid in some hours. Chipset: Intel Pro-Wireless 3945 Driver: IWL3945 (compat-wireless-old) System: Ubuntu Hardy, kernel 2.6.24.19 NM: 0.7~~svn20080908+eni0-0ubuntu4~nm1~hardy1 Encryption: IEEE802.1X using LEAP (and see bug 209602) ** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17900670/syslog -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273633] Re: Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
Here is the syslog generated using a vanilla Intrepid alpha 6 live cd. Hope this is enough, if not please ask! :-) ** Attachment added: syslog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17919677/syslog -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Confirmed in alpha 6 using a live cd today. Opening a new bug. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273633] [NEW] Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager This is not a duplicate of bug 209602. I am currently unable to connect to a WPA-encrypted network using Network-Manager. This has been verified both in Hardy (aasac's ppa, and compat-wireless), and with an Intrepid alpha 6 cd. Connection specifics in NM: connection security IEEE 802.1X; encryption: LEAP. It is not, however, fault of the driver, since I can connect to the network via cli and wpa_supplicant after shutting off NM and the dhcpclient, and restarting the dhcp client after I have established a connection. On the other hand, I am perfectly capable of connecting to the network using the very same version of NM but the long since deprecated (but custom installed on my box) driver IPW3945. It seems as if NM and the IWL driver are unable to cooperate. For more specifics on the network I am talking about, please refer to bug 209602 and the upstream bugzilla bug there indicated. I am currently unable to say if NM 0.6 does work with the driver. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Network-Manager 0.7 is unable to use IWL3945 to connect to WPA-encrypted networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254476] Re: python2.5 crashed with AttributeError in checkBatteryCritical()
Also happened at logon after boot, entering directly into KDE. Using a VirtualBox installation, it now works, yay :-) -- python2.5 crashed with AttributeError in checkBatteryCritical() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
I confirm the UI bug with both compat-wireless and network-manager 0.7 up-to-date. Should this bug (regarding the driver) be closed and a new one (regarding network-manager) be opened? -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270089] [NEW] Knetworkmanager 0.7 does not allow to connect to a GSM network, in general is poorer than GNOME counterpart
Public bug reported: I am using aasac's ppa to use Network-manager 0.7 in hardy, but AFAIK this problem exists also in Intrepid. Shortly, nm-applet allows to connect to a very broad range of networks, ranging from classical wired or wireless to gsm or VPN. I, for example, use this functionality to connect to a GSM networks using a HUAWEI modem. Network-manager-kde, on the other hand, is unable to manage this kind of connection. Please implement these features also in KDE :-) ** Affects: knetworkmanager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Knetworkmanager 0.7 does not allow to connect to a GSM network, in general is poorer than GNOME counterpart https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Ok, a bunch of news for this bug. Namely, it does support the encryption of my campus network, but there seems to be some incompatibility issues among the driver, Network Manager, and the dhcp client used by Ubuntu (dhclient). I am able to connect shutting down NetworkManager, killing dhclient and wpasupplicant, then connecting using wpa_supplicant from cli and finally restarting the dhcpclient. Hope someone sorts this out - but the driver is functioning now (albeit the compat-wireless version has no led support :-) ). Back to ipw3945 for now, but I really do hope you can make iwl3945 shine for the end of October :-) -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257403] Re: Update Flash plugin 10 to the new RC
+1 also for me. For user experience in Ubuntu, Flash 10 is many steps above Flash 9 (for example, often Flash 9 would stop loading some videos or applets). On the other hand, beta 2 is unusable - I experienced many Firefox crashes due to it. So I hope it gets updated soon :) In the meantime, thanks for the ppa! :-D -- Update Flash plugin 10 to the new RC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Ok, I tried the alpha with the new kernel today. The bug is NOT fixed: while I can connect using the ipw driver in hardy, the same settings in the alpha do not allow for the connection to be established. If there is some particular testing I can do to spread some light on the matter, please do ask, I have the alpha 5 cd with me and I will be more than happy to help. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Even worse news: I tried the most up-to-date compat wireless drivers (old version for kernels 2.6.27, 07 september) and with those drivers connection still did not function. Bug not fixed upstream I fear. :-( I am notifying the intel developers right now. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Update: using Compat Wireless drivers (latest updated 6th of August) does not fix the problem. Indeed, they actually crash keyboard using after resume from suspend. I will try with Alpha 5 live cd next week. -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145674] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
I have not experienced this bug in a long time now - wheter with 2.43 or 2.5 which I have installed some days ago through getdeb. Fixed as far as I know :-) Il giorno ven, 29/08/2008 alle 18.02 +, Andreas Moog ha scritto: Is this still an issue for you? Could you also try with version 2.4.3 from hardy-backports? -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145674] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
Will remember that, in any case I am not the original submitter - hope it is fixed for her/him, I do not see anything in the comments :-) Il giorno ven, 29/08/2008 alle 23.50 +, Andreas Moog ha scritto: This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status . Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Feel free to submit any future bugs you may find. ** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Dear Ogasawara, I am doing that right now. I have no chance to really test the wireless bug until next week (when I will be back on campus) but I can surely point to any other problems coming my way. Luckily this will be not the first time I install (and eventually regress) an up-to-date kernel. Wish me luck, Nvidia might put up a serious fight here :-) Il giorno gio, 28/08/2008 alle 18.00 +, Leann Ogasawara ha scritto: The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. There are one of two ways you should be able to test: 1) If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux- image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and test. --or-- 2) The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4. Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced. You should then be able to test via a LiveCD. Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the bug reported here or if the issue remains. More importantly, please open a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the 2.6.27 kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'. Also, please specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26 kernel. Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback. ** Tags added: cft-2.6.27 ** Attachment added: stock_smiley-1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17146677/stock_smiley-1.png -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 259004] Re: keyboard was broken after today's update
Confirmed. Keyboard functions out of Xorg, however, on the console terminal. Please fix this ASAP. -- keyboard was broken after today's update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Well, what can I say, it was a complete disaster. First of all, the kernel stopped cold while booting after installation, at the Loading hardware drivers step. I deduced, correctly, that this happened because xserver-xorg packages where not up-to-date and configured to work with this kernel ... so I installed them ... only to incur into bug 259004. Not only that, I cannot seem to be able to connect via cable now, I must have upgraded a package too many. All in all, disaster stroke my box ... guess I could have to reinstall everything ... what's worst, I was not able to determine whether the iwl drivers functioned or not. Sorry about this :-( Guess I will try to patch my box, otherwise I will format/reinstall (yuppidoo). And I'll wait for Alpha 5 before any more testing ... -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
It seems that the problem has been fixed upstream. By monday I will try this out using both a live cd (Intrepid) and the compat-wireless drivers (Hardy). Let us hope Linux has got rid of this bug :-) -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246301] Re: Update the FGLRX and NVIDIA driver to 8.6 and 173.14.09
I have updated and I have been using the new driver since this morning. I am on a Hardy 32-bit box, using a GeForce 7300 (Dell notebook). It works reasonably well, seemingly with no improvements or regressions compared with the previous version. I however experienced a system freeze some hours ago, while I was burning a dvd ... I am not sure it is nvidia - related, but while the burning was going on, keyboard or mouse inputs seemed not to be received by the systems, and I obviously had to do a hard-reboot. Signaling it here because I witnessed similar behaviour in the past related to issues with memory and the nvidia driver ... if someone could point me where to find relevant clues if this was nvidia related, I would be grateful. -- Update the FGLRX and NVIDIA driver to 8.6 and 173.14.09 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 106621] Re: Gnome Trash doesn't show deleted files on ntfs-3g partitions
Well, they did not technically eliminate the feature...rather they implemented it in a different way. But for the end user you are right: unless you know what to do, you're pretty much stuck. Could someone modify the ntfs-3g package so that the hack is directly implemented when the fstab is written? Paulo Pontes ha scritto: so, they fixed the bug eliminating the feature? Is it a try to convince me to swith back to windows? -- Gnome Trash doesn't show deleted files on ntfs-3g partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226200] [NEW] package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1
Public bug reported: Uninstalled Linux - i386, now I am unable to complete remove this package. I daresay it does no more find files related to the i386 kernel and thus stops befuddled. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sat May 3 19:03:35 2008 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None PackageArchitecture: i386 SourcePackage: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 Title: package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-17-generic i686 ** Affects: linux-backports-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226200] Re: package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1
** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14172807/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package linux-backports-modules-2.6.24-16-386 None failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso post-removal script ha restituito un codice di errore 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 209602] Re: The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions
Hi Leann, no problem at all. The patch will be released, when ready, at http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/download/compat-wireless-2.6 /compat-wireless-2.6.tar.bz2 which is updated daily. However, to the best of my knowledge, they are still working on it. I tried the modules in this package two days ago, and I was not even able to load the compiled modules - which makes me think they are working on this, heavily, or so I hope. Glad to be helpful, and I hope you guys will get this fixed soon :-) Leann Ogasawara ha scritto: Hi Luke, Sorry for the delayed response. I don't suppose you have a link to the patch they're referencing in the upstream bug report? Thanks. ** Also affects: linux via http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1507 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- The new IWL driver for Linux does not support some encryptions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203793] Re: [hardy][iwl3945] 3945ABG cannot associate to public WPA2 PSK network
The problem is not in Ubuntu, but rather in the main kernel. Details here: http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1507 Currently the developers are working on it. I guess that when the patch will be ready, it will be included in the linux or linux-backports packages...I hope. Otherwise, we will all have to install the modules through compat-wireless :-/ -- [hardy][iwl3945] 3945ABG cannot associate to public WPA2 PSK network https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217760] [NEW] Under 64 bit architecture, no easy way to add a 32-bit archive to synaptic or apt
Public bug reported: I recently switched to a 64 bit environment, hoping to use at most my box. However, I recently found out that under 64 bit architecture, there is no way to easily add a 32-bit only repository or, for that, to install a 32-bit package graphically. It must be done from the command line, using the dreaded sudo dpkg -i -f *package* I understand that installing core libraries compiled for another architecture could be dangerous and lead to system breakage. However, this limitation impairs me greatly; in my user case, I am no more able to install packages from the BioLinux 32 bit repository. I should download them manually, check all dependencies, and then install them all from the command line. This drags me so much I am switching back to 32-bit. I hope this gets solved soon - it's a shame we users with 64-bit CPUs are forced to use 32-bit systems just to be sure to be able to install everything we need. Regards ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Under 64 bit architecture, no easy way to add a 32-bit archive to synaptic or apt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216725] [NEW] compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz Got very slow after resuming from suspend (other times it simply froze, leaving me no other option but cold reboot). This time I tried to restart it; it almost froze; I was barely able to get to the console, kill the processes, and then restart X. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 13 12:27:26 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz.real NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: compiz-core 1:0.7.4-0ubuntu4 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/compiz.real --ignore-desktop-hints --replace --loose-binding --replace core ccp ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: compiz Stacktrace: #0 0x0040fee0 in ?? () #1 0x004124dc in eventLoop () #2 0x0040d049 in main () StacktraceTop: ?? () eventLoop () main () ThreadStacktrace: . Thread 1 (process 11523): #0 0x0040fee0 in ?? () #1 0x004124dc in eventLoop () #2 0x0040d049 in main () Title: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216725] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131679 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131679 ** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406514/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406515/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406516/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406517/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406518/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13406519/Registers.txt -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in eventLoop() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216175] [NEW] jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 214914 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 Public bug reported: Crashed while opening, no other operation in progress. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 12 09:28:51 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jockey-gtk InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: jockey-gtk 0.3.3-0ubuntu7 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/jockey-gtk ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/jockey-gtk'] SourcePackage: jockey Title: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: jockey (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216175] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 214914 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375347/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Devices.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375349/Devices.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375350/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375351/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375352/Traceback.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13375353/XorgConf.txt -- jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 214914] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled()
Fixed confirmed as functioning. Nice to see it up and running again ;-) PY ha scritto: thanks for the solution and to twist2be !!! the fix works very well -- jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enabled() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 215005] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enables_composite()
My guess. They introduced some kind of bug in jockey, which is now the program which cares for detecting if a closed video driver is available and needed/installable. This program does more than it looks; it not only cares for installing the packages, but actually configures the whole system so that they are used. Since this the fact that xorg.conf looks much barer and, well, useless, nowadays. Since jockey is obviously, bugged, however, this not only means that we can't enable simply our beloved restricted drivers, it also means that even if we install them, the system is not configured so to use them! My solution was simply to open my xorg.conf file, and add the old Driver nvidia line inside the video device section. Guess what, it worked, now I am back to compiz (note: this is kinda of a hack - which I hope is only temporary. Would be...embarassing to launch Hardy in this situation ;-) ). As for compiz behaving strangely today, that's another story. They are obviously upgrading the packages in the repo, but they are doing so at a strange pace...only some compiz packages are currently upgraded...so that now I have compiz-core but can't have compiz-gnome. Oh well, at least I can have compiz enabled. Guess we'll see it fixed in some hours... Kudos Jeldert Pol ha scritto: Fresh install of Hardy: 1. Try changing Visual Effects from None to Normal 2. It waits, and a crash report is detected. 3. Get message Desktop effects could not be enabled. 4. Visual Effects is back to None. I haven't installed any graphics drivers. Maybe it cannot be enabled because of that, but it shouldn't crash. -- jockey-gtk crashed with AttributeError in enables_composite() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215005 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212795] [NEW] pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin Cannot identify the crash reason. It would be nice if there was a way to automatically add the information gathered by apport even when subscribing to existing bugs, instead of having to file a new one for the information to be attached. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Sun Apr 6 13:46:21 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/pidgin NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: pidgin 1:2.4.0-1ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: pidgin ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: pidgin StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/purple-2/libjabber.so.0 ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 g_main_context_dispatch () ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Title: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-15-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-amd64-retrace -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212795] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146692/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146693/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146694/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146695/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146696/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146697/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146698/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13146699/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201462] Re: nautilus-gksu stopped working in hardy
Workaround confirmed as working for me. Why has it not become standard in the Ubuntu packages? :-/ -- nautilus-gksu stopped working in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212179] [NEW] gnome-screensaver crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_translate()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver Just coming back from X restart. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Apr 5 12:19:35 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-screensaver NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gnome-screensaver 2.22.1-0ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: gnome-screensaver ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=it_IT.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 cairo_translate () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 ?? () ?? () Title: gnome-screensaver crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_translate() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-15-generic x86_64 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare video ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-amd64-retrace -- gnome-screensaver crashed with SIGSEGV in cairo_translate() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
