[Bug 1756803] Re: 0.2.99.3 won't build with vala 0.40.0
synapse 0.2.99.4 builds with vala 0.40.3. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756803 Title: 0.2.99.3 won't build with vala 0.40.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/synapse-project/+bug/1756803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1630515] Re: topmenu-gtk built against GTK3+ segfaults when clicked
I don't have tried this application, I just came across this bug, but I guess this is due to structure change written in ./module/gtk3privates.h (yes, this is originally "private" header in gtk3, so the structures may change in gtk3). For example, with gtk+ 3.20, struct _GtkMenuPrivate has more members than what is written in ./module/gtk3privates.h in topmenu-gtk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1630515 Title: topmenu-gtk built against GTK3+ segfaults when clicked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/topmenu-gtk/+bug/1630515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1449233] Re: ffmpeg not used by xscreensaver-getimage-video
James, if you can please report this (feature request) to the upstream, which may bring more possibility that your request would be included into xscreensaver code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449233 Title: ffmpeg not used by xscreensaver-getimage-video To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1449233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1390304] Re: Noof does not preview or run
Thank you for confirming. I asked the upstream to enable double buffering on Linux again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1390304 Title: Noof does not preview or run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1390304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1390304] Re: Noof does not preview or run
If you can compile xscreensaver by yourself, can you try below?
Edit hacks/glx/noof.c as below:
Around the line 448:
ENTRYPOINT void
init_noof (ModeInfo *mi)
{
int i;
noof_configuration *bp;
#ifdef HAVE_JWZGLES <== REMOVE THIS LINE
dbuf_p = 1;
#endif <== REMOVE THIS LINE
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1390304
Title:
Noof does not preview or run
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1390304/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103975] Re: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()]
** Changed in: xscreensaver (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103975 Title: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/103975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103975] Re: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()]
(As I wrote in the previous comment, this issue is really 64 bit specific, does not happen on 32 bit) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103975 Title: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/103975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103975] Re: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()]
This issue is fixed in 5.22. ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911007 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xscreensaver.git/commit/?id=df2bf76a86058ead6baba8d025449ba4fbf60fa3 README in xscreensaver 5.22: * Fix for `bumps' in 64 bit. ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #911007 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911007 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103975 Title: [amd64] bumps crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() [PutPixel32()] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/103975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202908] Re: Xscreensaver: failed to execute it on Lubuntu saucy
This is that xscreensaver is not included in live iso, and not a problem on xscreensaver. http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/current/saucy-desktop-i386.manifest -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202908 Title: Xscreensaver: failed to execute it on Lubuntu saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1202908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1196251] Re: pacman crashed with SIGSEGV in is_bonus_dot()
Your patch is included in 5.22. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196251 Title: pacman crashed with SIGSEGV in is_bonus_dot() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1196251/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116006] Re: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL
> xscreensaver-demo does truncate http:// into http:/ This is xscreensaver-demo does NOT truncate http:// into http:/ (from 5.16) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116006 Title: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1116006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116006] Re: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL
All the above 3 patches were already included in 5.16, i.e. * xscreensaver-demo does truncate http:// into http:/ * xscreensaver-demo now uses memmove instead of strcpy when source and destination overlaps, which will _perhaps_ fix some strange about "degraeve" into "degraee" and so on. For reference, the diff of demo-Gtk.c between 5.15 and 5.16 is attached. ** Patch added: "diff of demo-Gtk.c between 5.15 and 5.16" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1116006/+attachment/3737098/+files/xscreensaver-5.15-5.16-demo-Gtk.c.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116006 Title: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1116006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116006] Re: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL
(and the above patch contains some mistakes: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xscreensaver.git/commit/?id=60fa5b4c75d354d808a219c52a7a648f9b22cfb1 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xscreensaver.git/commit/?id=888fb0d80b39f060f658cbf5670edae0cbaeeb4c ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116006 Title: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1116006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1196251] Re: pacman crashed with SIGSEGV in is_bonus_dot()
gcc developer says gcc 4.8 does this type of "aggressive optimization" when loop contains undefined behavior, ref: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/175876.html i.e. loop may be "optimized" into endless loop. By the way, I have sent the same patch to the upstream, which was accepted on 2013-06-10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196251 Title: pacman crashed with SIGSEGV in is_bonus_dot() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1196251/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116006] Re: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL
This is fixed in 5.16. ref: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xscreensaver.git/commit/?id=60149f5b6a8c8b18e20b0056046849b9c9080149 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116006 Title: xscreensaver-settings breaks imageDirectory line if it is a URL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1116006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1194841]
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #40) > Step to reproduce: > > * Launch with firefox -ProfileManager , create new profile, and launch > firefox with that (new) profile > * Go Preferences -> Advanced -> Network -> Connection -> Settings > * Once choose "Manual proxy configuration", set random http proxy, change > port > (like HTTP Proxy: aa Port: 8080). > * Then choose *again* "Use system proxy settings" > * Click OK > * Now open some http:// page like http://www.google.com/ on Linux (Fedora 19 i686) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194841 Title: Firefox 22 uses stale manual proxy settings when configured to use system proxy settings, and system proxy settings are set to "None" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1194841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1194841]
Step to reproduce: * Launch with firefox -ProfileManager , create new profile, and launch firefox with that (new) profile * Go Preferences -> Advanced -> Network -> Connection -> Settings * Once choose "Manual proxy configuration", set random http proxy, change port (like HTTP Proxy: aa Port: 8080). * Then choose *again* "Use system proxy settings" * Click OK * Now open some http:// page like http://www.google.com/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194841 Title: Firefox 22 uses stale manual proxy settings when configured to use system proxy settings, and system proxy settings are set to "None" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1194841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609451] Re: xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share
Note that with xscreensaver 5.21, AC_SYS_LARGEFILE is added to
configure.in, so _FILE_OFFSET_BITS will be set to 64 in config.h{,in} if
needed with doing configure, and modifying CFLAGS is no longer needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609451
Title:
xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/609451/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1067140] Re: Closing laptop lid locks even with "lock: False"
> I guess this is the key line in the log file: > xscreensaver: 21:17:14: LOCK ClientMessage received; activating and locking. > Presumably something, such as ACPI, is asking xscreensaver to lock rather than activate? Probably, from looking at the log. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067140 Title: Closing laptop lid locks even with "lock: False" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1067140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1067140] Re: Closing laptop lid locks even with "lock: False"
If you can still reproduce this bug, would you try lauching xscreensaver with $ xscreensaver -verbose -log output_log_name and attach the contents of output_log_name ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067140 Title: Closing laptop lid locks even with "lock: False" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1067140/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609451] Re: xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share
I discussed this with the upstream developer and we agreed to add "-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" to compiler flags when building whole xscreensaver source. He is now thinking where to write this on configure.in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609451 Title: xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/609451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609451] Re: xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share
Reproducible even with xscreensaver 5.18 on my i686 machine (client). It seems that stat() on the line 1256 in get_filename_1() in xscreensaver-getimage.c returns -1 with errno 75 = EOVERFLOW. stat(2) says that this can happen when such application was not compiled with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 and when using 32-bit platform. However while stat(2) says that this can happen when accessing too large file, this issue is not this case. For this case, EOVERFLOW happens because files on cifs-mounted system can return very large i-node : for people seeing this issue you can check this by "ls -ali" on cifs-mounted system. For people seeing this issue: would you try either of the below? * mount.cifs windows system with adding "noserverino" option * Adding "#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64" at the top of xscreensaver-getimage.c and recompile xscreensaver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609451 Title: xscreensaver-getimage can't find image on samba share To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/609451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007862] Re: Xscreensaver photopile hack configuration cryptic, images off screen
> photopile.diff While the comment changes in this photopile.diff was not applied, the changes in hacks/glx/photopile.c is already included in xscreensaver 5.16. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007862 Title: Xscreensaver photopile hack configuration cryptic, images off screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1007862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020575] Re: VidWhacker screensaver just gives "cannot open" "no such file" and "0-length data"
Perhaps this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746847 Fixed in xscreensaver 5.16 . ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #746847 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746847 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020575 Title: VidWhacker screensaver just gives "cannot open" "no such file" and "0-length data" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1020575/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007862] Re: Xscreensaver photopile hack configuration cryptic, images off screen
> The attached patch changes It is highly appreciated if you would send your patch to the upstream developer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007862 Title: Xscreensaver photopile hack configuration cryptic, images off screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1007862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign
I use ASCII characters only and currently I cannot check this. However do some people know some evidence that XLookupString checks LC_CTYPE? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923 Title: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign
> If I use `LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 xscreensaver`, only the date is scrambled, > but not the word "Password". Well, if I comment out #undef ENABLE_NLS in xscreensaver.c around line 1410, I still see garbage messages on both date and "Password" in LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 (note that you can see the name "tasaka1" in the picture Jamie attached). The scrambled "Password" string is actually returned from pam. Maybe you are using other authentification mechanism. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923 Title: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign
So something like attached is needed? ** Patch added: "Trial patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+attachment/2199597/+files/xscreensaver-5.14-XLookupString-need-locale.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923 Title: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 671923] Re: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign
Did someone try xscreensaver 5.14 for this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671923 Title: In XScreensaver unlock screen it is not possible to insert "€" sign To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/671923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 793344] Re: Xscreensaver lock box is having problem with special characters (display)
This issue is known on 5.12 and should be fixed in 5.13 (see comments around line 1405 in on xscreensaver-5.14/driver/xscreensaver.c) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793344 Title: Xscreensaver lock box is having problem with special characters (display) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/793344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239403] Re: Alexandria crashes on start-up
>From other posts and dump.txt attached on commeit 1, I guess Alperen is trying to use alexandria in Turkish locale (i.e. in LANG=tr_TR.UTF-8). If so, this is due to bugs in both ruby-gnome2 and alexandria. For ruby-gnome2 side, this was fixed in rev 2857 [1][2] For alexandria side, this was fixed in rev 1088 [3][4] [1] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1901843&group_id=53614&atid=470969 [2] http://ruby-gnome2.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ruby-gnome2?view=rev&revision=2857 [3] http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=863&aid=27015&group_id=205 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520170 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #1901843 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1901843 ** Bug watch added: rubyforge.org #27015 http://rubyforge.org/support/tracker.php?aid=27015 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #520170 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520170 -- Alexandria crashes on start-up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239403] Re: Alexandria crashes on start-up
** Changed in: alexandria (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Alexandria crashes on start-up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406534] Re: xscreensaver is not started between sessions
I am Fedora user and I am not familiar with ubuntu, however from this report it seems that José is using "karmic" branch (right?). If so, this is due to the change in gnome-settings-daemon 2.27.4 >From "NEWS" file in g-s-d: -- == Version 2.27.4 == - Remove screensaver plugin, it's autostarted now (Matthias Clasen) -- So now xscreensaver has to install desktop autostart stuff like gnome-screensaver does (I don't know where ubuntu installs desktop autostart stuff, however on Fedora it is /etc/xdg/autostart ) -- xscreensaver is not started between sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418419] Re: [amd64] abstractile crashed with SIGFPE in _init_screen()
I sent the following mail to Jamie. Hello, Jamie: When I was searching for xscreensaver bug reports on other distributions, I found this report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/418419 It seems this is another case where xscreensaver's hack (in this case abstractile) causes SIGFPE when window size is too small (in the report of this case the window's size seems 448x1, well very strange). However for abstractile even if the window is not so small (for example even if I try $ abstractile -geom 60x60) it causes SIGFPE like: --- (gdb) run -geom 60x60 Starting program: /usr/libexec/xscreensaver/abstractile -geom 60x60 warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libX11.so.6" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x0804da72 in abstractile_draw (dpy=0x8060130, window=136314881, closure=0x8070d70) at ../../hacks/abstractile.c:1537 1537 usleep = ((!st->ii) && (st->mode==MODE_CREATE)) ? 0 : Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install libICE-1.0.4-9.fc12.i686 libSM-1.1.0-7.fc12.i686 libXau-1.0.4-8.fc12.i686 libXmu-1.0.4-5.fc12.i686 libuuid-2.16-7.fc12.i686 (gdb) where #0 0x0804da72 in abstractile_draw (dpy=0x8060130, window=136314881, closure=0x8070d70) at ../../hacks/abstractile.c:1537 #1 0x08050054 in run_screenhack_table (ft=, window2=, window=, dpy=) at ../../hacks/screenhack.c:550 #2 main (ft=, window2=, window=, dpy=) at ../../hacks/screenhack.c:912 - I guess the attached patch should fix this issue. I would appreciate it if you would apply my patch (by the way I will send my patch to Ubuntu members later) Regards, Mamoru Tasaka ** Attachment added: "Proposal patch to fix this issue" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30912254/xscreensaver-5.08-hacks-window-too-small.patch -- [amd64] abstractile crashed with SIGFPE in _init_screen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174407] Re: Search results invisible in amd64 version
I guess this is the same as https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242602 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428195 Patch available from Novell bugzilla. -- Search results invisible in amd64 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
