[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
Thanks for the update Daniel. I cannot confirm the fix in 12.04/10 because I stopped using Unity because of this bug. I guess if nobody else confirms/denies you can just close it. If I switch back to Unity and still have issues I'll open another issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
Here is the strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized. ** Attachment added: "strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is maximized" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580682/+files/maximized -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
To be clear, I can reproduce this with any progress bar. The easiest is a file copy: 1) Start file copy of a reasonable (10's to 100's) of files which will last a few minutes 2) Peek at `top`, notice compiz is using 15%+ CPU and system has become extremely laggy 3) Minimize progress bar, notice compiz has dropped to 4% CPU and system is responsive This is the first performance issue I've yet encountered with my setup. The progress bars really aren't that dazzling to warrant the performance hit I'm seeing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
Here is the strace of compiz when the copy-progress-bar is minimized. ** Attachment added: "strace of compiz while the copy-progress-bar is minimized" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+attachment/2580681/+files/minimized -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884387] Re: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
** Attachment added: "lsof of compiz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387/+attachment/2580646/+files/lsof -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/884387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884387] [NEW] Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU
Public bug reported: Since upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10, I've noticed incredibly poor performance with Compiz and progress bars. For example, I just attempted a network copy of a directory of files (10's of them). My computer ground to a halt while the copy went, but as soon as I minimized the progress bar things improved dramatically. Curious, I peeked at `strace` and noticed it is spinning on reading from a UNIX socket, receiving several EAGAIN's for each successful read. If I maximize the progress bar, there are additional reads (some successful, some EAGAIN) as well as poll() and sched_yield() calls. This behavior is consistently reproducible and results in a 10% increase in CPU load by compiz when the progress bar is maximized. I will attach the two straces as well as a lsof. Opening them side-by- side with a difftool such as meld clearly shows the additional system calls being made when the window is maximized (which is when my system effectively became uselessly slow). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: unity 4.24.0-0ubuntu2b1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: "" .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 280.13 Wed Jul 27 16:53:56 PDT 2011 GCC version: gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,place,session,snap,gnomecompat,regex,move,mousepoll,animation,wall,fade,grid,vpswitch,resize,imgpng,scale,workarounds,expo,ezoom,unitymtgrabhandles,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz CurrentDmesg: [ 26.978072] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready [ 27.754662] EXT4-fs (sdc1): re-mounted. Opts: errors=remount-ro,commit=0 [ 28.235217] init: plymouth-stop pre-start process (1330) terminated with status 1 [ 33.734637] EXT4-fs (sdc1): re-mounted. Opts: errors=remount-ro,commit=0 [ 37.144030] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Date: Mon Oct 31 21:24:39 2011 DistUpgraded: Log time: 2011-10-13 21:06:09.956598 DistroCodename: oneiric DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia-173, 173.14.30, 2.6.38-11-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-173, 173.14.30, 3.0.0-12-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-current, 280.13, 2.6.38-11-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-current, 280.13, 3.0.0-12-generic, x86_64: installed ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz GraphicsCard: nVidia Corporation G80 [GeForce 8800 GTX] [10de:0191] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device [1458:3439] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. EP45-DQ6 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-12-generic root=UUID=6269bff0-61a9-4445-8224-e7e8db733842 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (17 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 09/30/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc. dmi.bios.version: F12 dmi.board.name: EP45-DQ6 dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF12:bd09/30/2008:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnEP45-DQ6:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnEP45-DQ6:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: EP45-DQ6 dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu5 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs 20090808ubuntu26 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.26-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.11-0ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.11-0ubuntu3 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu13 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.99~git20110811.g93fc084-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1 ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 oneiric running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884387 Title: Compiz is absurdly heavy on CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/8
[Bug 776261] Re: xdg-settings fails: awk: cannot open /home/user/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list (No such file or directory)
I too am affected by this bug. Touching the file resolved the issue for me. I am on i686 and its a 10.10-upgraded install of Natty (Unity). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776261 Title: xdg-settings fails: awk: cannot open /home/user/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list (No such file or directory) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772177] Re: Alt+Tab "Feels" slow
FWIW, this setting is configurable under 'Window Management' -> 'Static Application Switcher', under the 'Behaviour' tab. And yes, 0.2 makes no sense so much so I came looking to file a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772177 Title: Alt+Tab "Feels" slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367175] Re: thunderbird not using indicator applet
Evolution's Exchange plugin is broken for Exchange 2007+, so there really is no reason to use Evolution anymore. I'm using DavMail + Thunderbird + Lightning to talk to Exchange at work, and (IMO) it's a much happier experience than using Outlook on Windows. The only piece of the puzzle missing is the indicator applet. I'd be most happy if this was added :) -- thunderbird not using indicator applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493314] Re: gnomebaker exits unexpectedly
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509056/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36509057/XsessionErrors.txt -- gnomebaker exits unexpectedly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493314] [NEW] gnomebaker exits unexpectedly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnomebaker *** glibc detected *** gnomebaker: free(): invalid pointer: 0x094cdcd8 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c95ff1] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0x6c976f2] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0x6c9a79d] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2(cairo_surface_destroy+0x62)[0x5b1ee2] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2[0x5a6131] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2[0x5a7071] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2[0x5ca187] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2[0x5af7d6] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2[0x596d16] /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2(cairo_show_glyphs+0x5d)[0x59054d] /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0[0xbaaac8] /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0[0xbaae5b] /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0(pango_renderer_draw_glyphs+0x4a)[0x77933a] /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0[0xba9926] /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x3342d0] /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0(pango_renderer_draw_glyphs+0x4a)[0x77933a] /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0(pango_renderer_draw_glyph_item+0x4d)[0x77941d] /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0(pango_renderer_draw_layout_line+0x718)[0x779c78] /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0(pango_renderer_draw_layout+0x131)[0x779f41] /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0(gdk_draw_layout_with_colors+0x1d8)[0x333238] /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libmurrine.so[0xce4a38] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_paint_layout+0xea)[0x115877a] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10cb38f] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10db474] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x50d6f9] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0xd8)[0x50ef98] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x52449e] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x648)[0x5259b8] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x26)[0x525fb6] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x11f796e] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_propagate_expose+0x1a3)[0x1046683] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10466b1] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10139ed] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_forall+0xa4)[0x10471f4] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10484aa] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10db474] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x50d6f9] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0xd8)[0x50ef98] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x52449e] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x648)[0x5259b8] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x26)[0x525fb6] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x11f796e] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_propagate_expose+0x1a3)[0x1046683] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10466b1] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x100f82d] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_forall+0xa4)[0x10471f4] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10484aa] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10db474] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x50d6f9] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0xd8)[0x50ef98] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x52449e] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x648)[0x5259b8] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x26)[0x525fb6] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x11f796e] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_propagate_expose+0x1a3)[0x1046683] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10466b1] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x100f82d] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_container_forall+0xa4)[0x10471f4] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10484aa] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x101a5b1] /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x10db474] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x50d6f9] /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0xd8)[0x50ef98] === Memory map: 0011-00175000 r-xp 08:01 337841 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 00175000-00176000 r--p 00064000 08:01 337841 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 00176000-00178000 rw-p 00065000 08:01 337841 /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0.0.0 00178000-0017c000 r-xp 08:01 339311 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2200.2 0017c000-0017d000 r--p 3000 08:01 339311 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2200.2 0017d000-0017e000 rw-p 4000 08:01 339311 /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2200.2 0017e000-00181000 r-xp 08:01 339120 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2200.2 00181000-00182000 r--p 2000 08:01 339120 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2200.2 00182000-00183000 rw-p 3000 08:01 339120 /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2200.2 00183000-00185000 r-xp 08:01 337924 /usr/lib/libavahi-glib.so.1.0.1 00185000-00186000 r--p 1000 08:01 337924 /usr/lib/libavahi-glib.so.1.0.1 00186000-00187000 rw-p 2000 08:01 337924 /usr/lib/libavahi-glib.so.1.0.1 00187000-00189000 r-xp 08:01 337465 /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1.1.0 00189000-0018a000 rw-p 1000 08:01 337465 /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1.1.0 0018a000-001e6000 r-xp 08:01 338352 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 001e6000-001e7000 ---p 0005c000 08:01 338352 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 001e7000-001ea000 r--p 0005c000 08:01 338352 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 001ea000-001f1000 rw-p 0005f000 08:01 338352 /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0.0.0 001f1000-00205000 r-xp 08:01 338999 /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4.0.0 00205000-00206000 r--p 00014000 08:01 338999 /usr/lib/l
[Bug 490976] Re: Ubuntu looses internet connection after 10 minutes.
Summary: * Boot up * Start workflow (open IRC, browse Internet).. all is peachy * Random amount of time later: no new connections can be made (IRC stays connected, but can't browse Internet and so forth) * Rebooting only fixes this after a cooloff period * Problem does not present on Windows -- Ubuntu looses internet connection after 10 minutes. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
Thanks. That sounds reasonable to me. -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
What is the C++ behaviour if no QApplication is made? Surely it doesn't segfault as well? -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebindings in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454597] Re: Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874367/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33874368/XsessionErrors.txt -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454597] [NEW] Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault
Public bug reported: $ irb irb(main):001:0> require 'Qt4' => true irb(main):002:0> Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() (irb):2: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux] ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Oct 18 13:38:38 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: libqt4-ruby 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: kdebindings Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: kdebindings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Qt::SystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454597 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
