[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release
Kindly fix as this helps people like me who continuously switch between distros and its annonying. I was one of those who was happy with lsb- release and the /etc/lsb-release already provided by Ubuntu, however, the reasoning given in this FAQ provides a calm, reasoned explanation why they came up with this in the first place: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/os-release TIA and Much appreciated! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 Title: Please provide /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/947236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 803943] Re: compiz consuming a lot of cpu
This is a problem for me too. After many attempts at doing other things I was able to reduce (not eliminate) load averages from around 50% to 20% by removing VBlank in the CCSM and disabling Vertical refresh in AMD cccle. After I did unity --reset I noticed I kept getting error messages but they scrolled away quickly - however I could capture the parts where the error was shown and its below: (compiz:2409): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_client_add_dir: assertion `gconf_valid_key (dirname, NULL)' failed Initializing unityshell options...done compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0xc00090! compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug about this. compiz (core) - Warn: unhandled ConfigureNotify on 0xc000a1! compiz (core) - Warn: this should never happen. you should probably file a bug about this. If you need more info let me know what I should do. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803943 Title: compiz consuming a lot of cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/803943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951095] Re: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity
Just checked with fully up-to-date precise and bug persists. Steps to reproduce: 1. open gnome-terminal 2. Go to full-screen 3. type evince which opens correctly in foreground but gvim/chromium-browser/nautilus open incorrectly in background Basically gnome-based apps open correctly in foreground but others are random -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951095 Title: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 964092] [NEW] Super key and Alt+F2 do not show same list, yet look the same visually
Public bug reported: This bug affects Unity in Ubuntu 12.04 Beta. To repeat: - Press Super key and do a search for an application (firefox for example): a list of applications show up. Dismiss with Esc - Now press Alt+F2 and do a search for application (firefox for example): a list of most recently used applications show up. - Visually they both look and fee the same but behave very differently. This is potentially very confusing to power users. In the example above there is no confusion between the two prompts, however if you are searching for AMD Catalyst Control Centre then the results are different and confusing. AMD Catalyst Control Centre only starts when the Super key prompt was used, but for some reason it does not start when Alt+F2 prompt was used (even the commands displayed are different). The same confusion can be observed with the Chromium brower, entering the first few chars of chromium with the Super key prompt works fine but it does not with the Alt+F2 prompt (even though the entire word chromium is entered). ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 12.04 beta unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964092 Title: Super key and Alt+F2 do not show same list, yet look the same visually To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/964092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 964225] Re: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with SIGSEGV in QSocketNotifier::setEnabled()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964225 Title: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with SIGSEGV in QSocketNotifier::setEnabled() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/964225/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 964225] Re: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with SIGSEGV in QSocketNotifier::setEnabled()
Sorry the file was an .ogv (video) not .ogg (audio) that I was playing back when the crash occurred. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964225 Title: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with SIGSEGV in QSocketNotifier::setEnabled() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/964225/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647802] Re: amdcccle crashed with SIGSEGV
I had this problem when I booted my laptop into single display (basicially just the laptop screen) mode after having configured it earlier in multiple display (extended desktop) mode. Worked fine when it was configured in single display and later connected an external monitor (in that situation only mirrored desktops worked) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647802 Title: amdcccle crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/647802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951095] Re: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity
One more thing, this happens when gnome-console is full screen. When the gnome-console is windowed, gvim appears fine. My system is kept upto date and I check for the bug again before posting, so yes the bug is still there as of this comment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951095 Title: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951095] [NEW] New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity
Public bug reported: To reproduce: 1. Open terminal 2. In the terminal type gvim or any x window program 3. New window opens behind termnal window It used to open in front of the terminal window in 10.04 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.4.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,regex,move,vpswitch,compiztoolbox,animation,grid,resize,place,session,snap,mousepoll,gnomecompat,imgpng,workarounds,expo,ezoom,wall,unitymtgrabhandles,fade,scale,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Fri Mar 9 14:44:11 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: precise DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: fglrx, 8.911, 3.2.0-17-generic, x86_64: installed fglrx, 8.911, 3.2.0-18-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RS880M [Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series] [1002:9712] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:1604] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (2029.1) JockeyStatus: xorg:fglrx_updates - ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver (post-release updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use) xorg:fglrx - ATI/AMD proprietary FGLRX graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Presario CQ56 Notebook PC ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_CA:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-18-generic root=UUID=bc18d9e1-f90f-446a-bef2-85ef61b83445 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/18/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: F.18 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: 1604 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: 88.17 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.18:bd04/18/2011:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPresarioCQ56NotebookPC:pvr059510242810010020100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1604:rvr88.17:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Presario CQ56 Notebook PC dmi.product.version: 059510242810010020100 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu5 version.fglrx-installer: fglrx-installer N/A version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.1-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu6 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.99.901+git20120126-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 precise regression reproducible ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951095 Title: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951095] Re: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951095 Title: New windows appear behind existing ones using Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/951095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 949921] [NEW] X Server crashed when I tried to watch an mp4 movie in firefox
Public bug reported:
http://trailers.gametrailers.com/gt_vault/11027/gt_cryengine_techtrailer_gdc_cam_gt_640x360_1200_m30.mp4
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: firefox 11.0~b5+build1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC270 Analog [ALC270 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC270 Analog [ALC270 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: mark 26519 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20120302120225
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xf040 irq 16'
Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC270'
Components : 'HDA:10ec0270,103c1604,00100100'
Controls : 20
Simple ctrls : 11
Channel: beta
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:18:36 2012
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
IncompatibleExtensions:
NoScript - ID={73a6fe31-595d-460b-a920-fcc0f8843232}, Version=2.3.2,
minVersion=1.9a2, maxVersion=1.9.6, Location=app-profile, Type=extension,
Active=Yes
Test Pilot - ID=testpi...@labs.mozilla.com, Version=1.2, minVersion=3.5,
maxVersion=10.*, Location=app-profile, Type=extension, Active=Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64
(2029.1)
IpRoute:
default via 172.17.0.1 dev wlan0 proto static
169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
172.17.0.0/16 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.148.230 metric 2
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=11.0/20120302120225 (Running)
RfKill:
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
RunningIncompatibleAddons: True
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 04/18/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: F.18
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 1604
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.board.version: 88.17
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.18:bd04/18/2011:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPresarioCQ56NotebookPC:pvr059510242810010020100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1604:rvr88.17:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: Presario CQ56 Notebook PC
dmi.product.version: 059510242810010020100
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug beta-channel precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949921
Title:
X Server crashed when I tried to watch an mp4 movie in firefox
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/949921/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 949921] Re: X Server crashed when I tried to watch an mp4 movie in firefox
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949921 Title: X Server crashed when I tried to watch an mp4 movie in firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/949921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 467127] Re: ksoftirqd/0 hogs one core after resume from suspend
Here is mine: - lspci output: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub (rev 07) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port (rev 07) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 03) 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 03) 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 03) 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 03) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 03) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 03) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 03) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 03) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 03) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 03) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 03) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev 93) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation ICH9M LPC Interface Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation ICH9M/M-E SATA AHCI Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G92 [GeForce 9800M GTX] (rev a2) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) 04:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): JMicron Technology Corp. IEEE 1394 Host Controller 04:00.1 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. SD/MMC Host Controller 04:00.2 SD Host controller: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host Controller 04:00.3 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. MS Host Controller 07:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5300 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection - lsusb output: Bus 008 Device 002: ID 045e:0745 Microsoft Corp. Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 002: ID 147e:2016 Upek Biometric Touchchip/Touchstrip Fingerprint Sensor Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 045e:00db Microsoft Corp. Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 V1.0 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 5986:0303 Acer, Inc Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467127 Title: ksoftirqd/0 hogs one core after resume from suspend -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 467127] Re: ksoftirqd/0 hogs one core after resume from suspend
Unsolved as of: #uname -a Linux adler 2.6.32-25-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 19:52:42 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux My observation is that if Firefox with Flash running is suspended and then resumed the bug kicks in, however I cannot confirm that exactly. NOTE: I am not running sr_mod modules as suggested by other bug reporters above (in many duplications of this bug report on Ubuntu). I am surprised that this bug is not getting critical attention especially since it cuts across kernel versions and across Linux distributions. -- ksoftirqd/0 hogs one core after resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567660] Re: Suspend and Hibernate cause ksoftirqd to use 100% of a cpu core on resume
This issue has not been resolved as of: #uname -a Linux adler 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux #top|head top - 21:33:45 up 2:25, 2 users, load average: 1.16, 1.05, 0.70 Tasks: 180 total, 3 running, 177 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 9.7%us, 2.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 82.9%id, 0.7%wa, 0.0%hi, 4.6%si, 0.0%st Mem: 4055620k total, 1567716k used, 2487904k free,94160k buffers Swap: 3858388k total,0k used, 3858388k free, 513732k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 4806 root 20 0 000 R 101 0.0 8:35.37 ksoftirqd/1 1308 root 20 0 210m 103m 20m S2 2.6 6:12.78 Xorg 3162 mark 20 0 239m 47m 20m S2 1.2 1:11.44 compiz #lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub (rev 07) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Graphics Port (rev 07) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 03) 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 03) 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 03) 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 03) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03) 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 03) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 03) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 03) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 03) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 03) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 03) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 03) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev 93) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation ICH9M LPC Interface Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation ICH9M/M-E SATA AHCI Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G92 [GeForce 9800M GTX] (rev a2) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) 04:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): JMicron Technology Corp. IEEE 1394 Host Controller 04:00.1 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. SD/MMC Host Controller 04:00.2 SD Host controller: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host Controller 04:00.3 System peripheral: JMicron Technology Corp. MS Host Controller 07:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5300 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection I cannot use suspend on my laptop because this bug eventually eats up CPU and puts tremendous load on the laptop. Any help would really be appreciated. -- Suspend and Hibernate cause ksoftirqd to use 100% of a cpu core on resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 567660] Re: Suspend and Hibernate cause ksoftirqd to use 100% of a cpu core on resume
This issue has not be resolved as of: #uname -a Linux adler 2.6.32-24-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 09:20:59 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux #top|head top - 20:19:03 up 1:24, 3 users, load average: 1.03, 1.15, 0.92 Tasks: 184 total, 2 running, 182 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 5.8%us, 2.6%sy, 0.1%ni, 75.1%id, 2.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 14.2%si, 0.0%st Mem: 4055620k total, 1685048k used, 2370572k free,89380k buffers Swap: 3858388k total,0k used, 3858388k free, 695080k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 4 root 20 0 000 R 98 0.0 17:54.91 ksoftirqd/0 1 root 20 0 23696 1948 1268 S0 0.0 0:00.95 init 2 root 20 0 000 S0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd This is a regression bug because it was not present in Ubuntu 9.10 (karmic) Any help is much appreciated. -- Suspend and Hibernate cause ksoftirqd to use 100% of a cpu core on resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334544] Re: indicator applet needs keyboard shortcut
Super+M used to toggle the laptop between normal and negative mode (easier on the eyes in different light conditions) in earlier versions of Ubuntu but it does not seem to work anymore, Instead now it highlights the mail message icon. How do I restore it to not go to the mail icon? -- indicator applet needs keyboard shortcut https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
OK I also found that the steps mentioned in my previous post were temporary, meaning the changes I made did not persist after a couple of reboots and resumes from suspend. The good news is now I now have the exact output that occurs after stopping /dev/sr0, it is as follows # hal-disable-polling --device /dev/sr0 Polling for drive /dev/sr0 have been disabled. The fdi file written was /etc/hal/fdi/information/media-check-disable-storage_model_Optiarc_DVD_RW_AD_7560S.fdi Clearly this shows that the Optiarc drive is involved, so it is a genuine problem for those of us that have Optiarc drives. BTW, stopping polling reduced my load in a matter of seconds from close to 100% to close to 0%. Please keep this bug active (and critical) till it is fixed by someone in the know. Thanks. -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
Thanks Chase (and Martin). Sorry I had not read his earlier post. The udev rules outlined in Martin's post worked after I rebooted. I'll post again should anything come up later. What I cannot understand though is if HAL is disabled, why then does the hald daemon automatically start. I do not have settings that enabled that daemon to start because I am working with the stock installation of Lucid. All help is much appreciated! -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
OK I just found a way to drop the CPU load without stopping udev. The trouble is I cannot confirm that this method will work because I was not able to re-duplicate it before posting, so your mileage might vary. Here is what I did: # hal-disable-polling --device /dev/sr0 It printed a bunch of messages that got lost because I did a top to check the load and was surprised to find that the CPU load dropped instantaneously!! The funny thing (to me) is if HAL was dropped from Lucid and if I did a fresh install of Lucid so the /etc scripts should not have had any initialization of HAL, why then should any HAL stuff be running?? I sometimes saw: hal-addon-stor running but never thought of stopping it until now. What is even more strange to me is when I do the following right now: # ps ax|grep hal I see: 1862 ?Ssl0:00 /usr/sbin/hald 1863 ?S 0:00 hald-runner 1899 ?S 0:00 hald-addon-input: Listening on /dev/input/event5 /dev/input/event10 /dev/input/event7 /dev/input/event6 /dev/input/event2 /dev/input/event1 /dev/input/event9 /dev/input/event3 /dev/input/event0 1902 ?S 0:00 /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-rfkill-killswitch 1903 ?S 0:00 /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-leds 1913 ?S 0:00 /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-generic-backlight 1921 ?S 0:00 hald-addon-storage: no polling on /dev/sr0 because it is explicitly disabled 1926 ?S 0:00 /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-cpufreq 1927 ?S 0:00 hald-addon-acpi: listening on acpid socket /var/run/acpid.socket 3650 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep hal So what's going on? Has HAL truly been disabled or what? Any serious explanation of what happened to solve the problem for me would be much appreciated. The load kind of instantly dropped and do not come back after restarting my laptop, which is a good thing in my book. :) -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
This bug is really bugging me, because despite being upto date with everything released so far, it wont go away for me. :) I have tried everything recommended on this thread, but the load does not come down as much as if I were to shutdown udev completely. I include a snapshot of all running process, with intermittent udev restarts, to show that the problem does not go away on my machine. As you observe in the attached file, the load drops significantly as soon as I stop udev, but restarting it at various late intervals does not change the load much. Interestingly, powertop reports this suggestion for udevd. The program 'udevd' is writing to file 'block:sr0' on /dev/devtmpfs. This prevents the disk from going to powersave mode. ** Attachment added: udev-load.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41268255/udev-load.txt -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
Ok after upgrading to the latest kernel I notice slight drop in load activity with udevd, but it is still too high - never below 0.6. Even after restarting it makes no difference. My details are: # uname -msrv Linux 2.6.32-15-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 2 02:23:29 UTC 2010 x86_64 # udevd --version 151 BTW its udisks-daemon that seems to run constantly and grab CPU resources (11% almost constantly). Stopping udevd automatically stops udisks-daemon. -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
@Chase Douglas, You are right, if the stop udev command is put into /etc/rc.local my usb keyboard and mouse are not recognized at startup. However if I do not have the stop udev command in /etc/rc.local and only run the stop command after booting up and logging in with the usb keyboard and mouse plugged in I get to keep the mouse and keyboard and still reduce the load. Of course, it wont recognize other usb changes subsequently. I understand this is a hack, but if I do not stop udev then I run out of battery power pretty quickly and my laptop heats up very fast. One point though: this was not an issue with 9.04, because I never experienced this problem there. I did not try 9.10 so I cannot say. So this, to me, indicates that it might not be a hardware problem because the Optiarc DVD drive was working fine in 9.04, unless the drivers have changed with 10.04 and that is causing the excessive load. -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525646] Re: udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources
Thanks for the feedback. I tried doing what you asked but it did not go away. Besides that command stays in the foreground and does not return control back to me unless I terminate it with Ctrl+C. Even if I put it into the background top still shows udisks-daemon as being the no 1 process always. I put it into the background by keeping a separate shell window open for root purposes and sent it to the background from there. The load has not dropped at all. Also I have a USB mouse and a USB keyboard always plugged in. Other than that nothing else is plugged in. BTW this is a new issue, did not happen in 9.04 the load was stable then. I have not tried 9.10. -- udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
I found a temp fix for me. I had top showing the load in excess of 1.00 but after shutting down udevd the load has come down to 0.04. The way I stopped it was: service udev stop. I am running Lucid Alpha on x86_64, # uname -v #20-Ubuntu SMP Sat Feb 20 05:18:19 UTC 2010 # udevd --version 151 I am not sure of the impact of stopping udev but the load has definitely come down. -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 379780] Re: CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage
Sorry I forgot to add: # dmesg|grep DVD [2.763607] ata2.00: ATAPI: Optiarc DVD RW AD-7560S, SX01, max UDMA/100, ATAPI AN [2.779568] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROMOptiarc DVD RW AD-7560S SX01 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 -- CD-ROM polling on some Optiarc drives causes high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347504] Re: CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37
Thanks for replying back. I decided to try Lucid Alpha after seeing your email and the issue seems to be resolved. Although I would prefer a better console font, the default is too big for me. :) I am reporting bugs in Lucid as I find them. -- CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525646] Re: udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources
Killing udisks seemed to help. I notice that this problem is tied to udevd for the Optiarc DVD RW AD-7560S drive. I filled out a bug report there too. See bug #379780 -- udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525646] [NEW] udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udisks udisks-daemon, along with udevd and gfs-gdu-volume take up too many CPU resources, keeping the load average greater than 1.00 almost always. This bug affects the Lucid alpha 2 release. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 364342737d74ff0502628d80af85aabb CheckboxSystem: fd8350d9b72fe6ed6c9e30db9b330e47 CurrentDmesg: [ 18.753736] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver [ 18.863225] ACPI Warning for \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.VGA_.MXMI: Excess arguments - needs 1, found 2 (20090903/nspredef-303) [ 18.863264] ACPI Warning for \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.VGA_.MXMS: Excess arguments - needs 1, found 2 (20090903/nspredef-303) [ 31.413091] ACPI Warning for \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.VGA_.MXMI: Excess arguments - needs 1, found 2 (20090903/nspredef-303) [ 31.413127] ACPI Warning for \_SB_.PCI0.P0P2.VGA_.MXMS: Excess arguments - needs 1, found 2 (20090903/nspredef-303) Date: Mon Feb 22 04:24:10 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100220) MachineType: System76, Inc. Bonobo Professional NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: udisks 1.0.0~git20100212.aae17d9-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-14-generic root=UUID=7eceecd9-7aec-4534-85db-522d5abddfa4 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_CA.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-14.20-generic SourcePackage: udisks Uname: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic x86_64 dmi.bios.date: 01/15/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: 1.00.12BO dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: M570TU dmi.board.vendor: CLEVO CO. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr1.00.12BO:bd01/15/2009:svnSystem76,Inc.:pnBonoboProfessional:pvrbonp2:rvnCLEVOCO.:rnM570TU:rvrNotApplicable:cvnNoEnclosure:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Bonobo Professional dmi.product.version: bonp2 dmi.sys.vendor: System76, Inc. ** Affects: udisks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525646] Re: udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources
** Attachment added: AtaSmartBlob_sda.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518262/AtaSmartBlob_sda.gz ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518263/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518264/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518265/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518266/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: Mounts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518267/Mounts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518268/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518269/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518270/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UDisksDump.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518271/UDisksDump.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518272/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39518273/UdevLog.txt -- udisks-daemon takes up too much CPU resources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482544] Re: Udev relatively high CPU usage
Happens to me in Lucid, alpha 2 release, as well -- Udev relatively high CPU usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482544 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347504] Re: CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24285637/Xorg.0.log -- CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 347504] [NEW] CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37
Public bug reported: I cannot get the login prompt when using CTRL+ALT+F(1...5). on Jaunty. I had the same problem with Ubuntu 8.04 with previous version of nvidia (173.x I think) Details: $ uname -a Linux adler 2.6.28-11-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 20 19:51:24 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $cat /proc/driver/nvidia/registry EnableVia4x: 0 EnableALiAGP: 0 NvAGP: 3 ReqAGPRate: 15 EnableAGPSBA: 0 EnableAGPFW: 0 Mobile: 4294967295 ResmanDebugLevel: 4294967295 RmLogonRC: 1 ModifyDeviceFiles: 1 DeviceFileUID: 0 DeviceFileGID: 0 DeviceFileMode: 438 RemapLimit: 0 UpdateMemoryTypes: 4294967295 UseVBios: 1 RMEdgeIntrCheck: 1 UsePageAttributeTable: 4294967295 EnableMSI: 0 MapRegistersEarly: 0 RegistryDwords: Xorg.0.log file attached Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- CTRL+ALT+F1 = blank screen using nvidia 180.37 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
