[Bug 1717246] Re: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] .unload = nv_drm_unload, )
C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a] "Proprietary, tested" driver allows hardware acceleration in Chrome browser With hardware acceleration enabled in Chrome browser the display eventually goes wonky and locks up the computer. Nouveau workaround is to disable hardware acceleration in Chrome browser. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717246 Title: nvidia-* kernel module failed to build (error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] .unload = nv_drm_unload,) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1717246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1742837] Re: nvidia-304 304.135-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-304 kernel module failed to build (error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] .unload = nv_
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1717246 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717246 C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a] "Proprietary, tested" driver allows hardware acceleration in Chrome browser With hardware acceleration enabled in Chrome browser the display eventually goes wonky and locks up the computer. Nouveau workaround is to disable hardware acceleration in Chrome browser. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742837 Title: nvidia-304 304.135-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-304 kernel module failed to build (error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] .unload = nv_drm_unload,) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304/+bug/1742837/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307717] Re: multiple problems with new chromium-browser
My icedtea-7-plugin doesn't work in Chromium 34. https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=363921 is related. ** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/chromium/issues #363921 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=363921 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307717 Title: multiple problems with new chromium-browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1307717/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise
I just checked suspend/hibernate and they are both broken. I'm not sure if suspend/hibernate would work with Nouveau or any other driver on this Dell Inspiron 8500 better than with the latest nvidia-96. I haven't used these features much so unfortunately I can't contribute further. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 09:33 AM, Bib wrote: HI Mark I see we have the very same video. Please could you talk about sleep/hibernation with me at f0rhumatfreedotfr ? Thank you Here is my own report $ sudo lshw -C display [sudo] password for me: *-display description: VGA compatible controller produit: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x] fabriquant: NVIDIA Corporation identifiant matériel: 0 information bus: pci@:01:00.0 version: a1 bits: 32 bits horloge: 66MHz fonctionnalités: pm agp agp-3.0 vga_controller bus_master vga_palette cap_list rom configuration: driver=nvidia latency=248 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5 ressources: irq:11 mémoire:fc00-fcff mémoire:f000-f3ff mémoire:fd00-fd01 $ jockey-text -l xorg:nvidia_96 - Pilote d'accélération graphique NVIDIA (Propriétaire, Activé, Utilisé) $ apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-96: Installé : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Candidat : 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Table de version : *** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0 400 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-proposed/restricted i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/restricted i386 Packages $ /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23 Not software rendered:yes Not blacklisted: yes GLX fbconfig: yes GLX texture from pixmap: yes GL npot or rect textures: yes GL vertex program:yes GL fragment program: no GL vertex buffer object: yes GL framebuffer object:no GL version is 1.4+: yes Unity 3D supported: no $ glxgears Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate. 12872 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2574.231 FPS -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948053 Title: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise Status in NVIDIA Drivers Ubuntu: New Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-173” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-96” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-173” source package in Precise: Fix Released Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates” source package in Precise: Fix Released Status in “nvidia-graphics-drivers-96” source package in Precise: Fix Committed Bug description: Packages are available from the archive but uninstallable # apt-get install nvidia-96 nvidia-173 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: nvidia-173 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be installed nvidia-96 : Depends: xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable Recommends: nvidia-settings but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. # apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-173 nvidia-96: Installed: (none) Candidate: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 Version table: 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/restricted amd64 Packages nvidia-173: Installed: (none) Candidate: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 Version table: 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/restricted amd64 Packages ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nvidia-173 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Tue Mar 6 14:26:34 2012
Re: [Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise
Works for me too on a clean install: $ sudo lshw -C display [sudo] password for ml1: *-display description: VGA compatible controller product: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x] vendor: NVIDIA Corporation physical id: 0 bus info: pci@:01:00.0 version: a1 width: 32 bits clock: 66MHz capabilities: pm agp agp-3.0 vga_controller bus_master vga_palette cap_list rom configuration: driver=nvidia latency=248 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5 resources: irq:11 memory:fc00-fcff memory:f000-f3ff memory:fd00-fd01 $ jockey-text -l xorg:nvidia_96 - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use) $ apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-96: Installed: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/restricted i386 Packages $ /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23 Not software rendered:yes Not blacklisted: yes GLX fbconfig: yes GLX texture from pixmap: yes GL npot or rect textures: yes GL vertex program:yes GL fragment program: no GL vertex buffer object: yes GL framebuffer object:no GL version is 1.4+: yes Unity 3D supported: no $ glxgears Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate. 13663 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2732.545 FPS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948053 Title: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/948053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948053] Re: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise
Works for me too on a clean install: $ sudo lshw -C display [sudo] password for ml1: *-display description: VGA compatible controller product: NV28 [GeForce4 Ti 4200 Go AGP 8x] vendor: NVIDIA Corporation physical id: 0 bus info: pci@:01:00.0 version: a1 width: 32 bits clock: 66MHz capabilities: pm agp agp-3.0 vga_controller bus_master vga_palette cap_list rom configuration: driver=nvidia latency=248 maxlatency=1 mingnt=5 resources: irq:11 memory:fc00-fcff memory:f000-f3ff memory:fd00-fd01 $ jockey-text -l xorg:nvidia_96 - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use) $ apt-cache policy nvidia-96 nvidia-96: Installed: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 96.43.23-0ubuntu0.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/restricted i386 Packages $ /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 4200 Go/AGP/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 1.5.8 NVIDIA 96.43.23 Not software rendered:yes Not blacklisted: yes GLX fbconfig: yes GLX texture from pixmap: yes GL npot or rect textures: yes GL vertex program:yes GL fragment program: no GL vertex buffer object: yes GL framebuffer object:no GL version is 1.4+: yes Unity 3D supported: no $ glxgears Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate. 13663 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2732.545 FPS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948053 Title: nvidia-173 and nvidia-96 uninstallable on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nvidia-drivers-ubuntu/+bug/948053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
I found this workaround today. I added the repository and installed the latest version. Hopefully this method helps people (not a bug fix but a good workaround). If you use it you agree to Oracles terms. http://www.duinsoft.nl/packages.php?t=en#repo The repository of duinsoft.nl, which is owned by a respected member of the Dutch Ubuntu community. This contains a script that will always pull the newest Oracle Java from the Oracle website, and install it in your system. Easy as can be! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
Thanks Tuxo for a better method. That's the first thing I tried to do. Odd I could not find the previous version when I tried to do it. That's the only reason I used the PPA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
Ah ha. Marc's the rude guy that did this to my jre :) Just kidding. I've never been fan of shooting the messenger and security must be top priority. I wish I could find the location of the Oracle proposal to create downloadable deb files and make them available on the donload page (I saw it about a month ago). That needs our support if anyone can find it. I think it is in the SDN and/or an oracle.com web site. Meanwhile I just want to use the structure that the old packages created (that's why I just copy the new jre over the top of the old jre). It's way better than playing with sym links every time I upgrade jre and/or try a different browser (not to mention every jre tutorial has a different install location). Whoever did the partner jre packages did a nice job of integration. Next it would be nice if openjdk would be a trouble-free replacement for Oracle java. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
I second the wish that a description was in my face at the time of the update. Once somebody blocks an update such as this the burden of security is on them. I was at 6.29 using my overwrite method mentioned above. This update blew all that away since it was designed to deal with the insecure 6.26. Regarding the somewhat off topic scenario... I got fed up with dealing with typical manual methods but I'd suggest trying to satisfy each dependancy one at a time...Or... You could try my method in the fourth post above and then if you don't lke PPAs, disable the PPA when you are done. After that copy the latest jre over the top of the old jre. Go to the java test page in your favorite browser and it will show you that you have the latest version. Next time you update just repeat the workaround process (copy over the previous version). It works/worked for me. Hopefully we won't need to do this too long. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
Oh. BTW my online banking will not work with openjdk 6/7 as currently available. I tried it. Argh! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
By the way... I was not using 6.26 in it's vulnerable condition but rather manually copied 6.29 over the top of the 6.26 installation. The manual installations on the internet are garbage requiring maintenance that the native installation did not need. I tell you I am really sad to not have this configured nicely like 6.26 used to do. I don't see how to get it back either. That's mighty rude of somebody to do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905026] Re: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03
OK. A quick workaround... So it's been less than an hour and I used a popular ppa to put everything back to 6.26 (it seems nearly the same as the partner version). I then downloaded the latest jre from the Oracle site, executed it to extract the contents and then copied the contents of .../jre1.6.0_30/ over the top of the ppa's newly installed /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.26/jre/ It's ugly but provides the latest sun jre without the messy hacks suggested by the manual installations. When jre1.6.0_31 and subsequent are needed just repeat the process. So if this was done as a security measure I understand. There are probably plenty of people not doing what I am doing to upgrade to the latest secure version. I'm just using the 6.26 installation as a framework to provide a nice installation of the latest version. Although it is ugly it is nicer than manual installations. Did I mention the manual installations are rough. Argh. Also, somewhere I saw an Oracle page that was pushing for .deb versions of java/jre on the download page. If it happens that would be nice :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905026 Title: Browser plugin not working after upgrade to Sun jre 1.6.0_26-b03 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sun-java6/+bug/905026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 717717] Re: V4L support can't be enabled on 2.6.38+
Woohoo! It works for me too. On Fri, 27 May 2011 06:01 +, Thomas Mashos 717...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Please test the packages here. These are using upstreams 0.24 backported patch from master. Please post results here as well https://launchpad.net/~mythbuntu-bugs/+archive/test4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717717 Title: V4L support can't be enabled on 2.6.38+ Status in MythTV: New Status in “mythtv” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: mythtv My capture card has been disabled since Myth isn't built with V4L. My previous version installed roughly two weeks ago had it. Perhaps libv4l-dev needs to be a build-dep? 2011-02-12 09:40:34.418 mythbackend: MythBackend started as master server 2011-02-12 09:40:34.626 TVRec(1) Error: V4L card configured on video device /dev/video0, but MythTV was not compiled with V4L support. Recompile MythTV with V4L support or remove the card from the configuration and restart MythTV. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: mythtv-backend 2:0.24.0+fixes.20110208.6318d52-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Feb 12 09:59:08 2011 Installed_mythtv_dbg: 2:0.24.0+fixes.20110208.6318d52-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SourcePackage: mythtv To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mythtv/+bug/717717/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717717 Title: V4L support can't be enabled on 2.6.38+ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573983] Re: KMS radeon in Lucid renders X unusable, but only since about April 26
Until this bug is fixed my workaround is: sudo cp -p /etc/X11/xorg.conf.failsafe /etc/X11/xorg.conf NOTE: /etc/X11/xorg.conf did not exist previously System Preferences Monitors indicates 1280x1024 0hz (previously it had many settings but this bug existed in all of the previous settings). -- KMS radeon in Lucid renders X unusable, but only since about April 26 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507881] Re: Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab
My Virtualbox 3.14 USB just kept working with no action after removing the fstab entry. If your Virtualbox USB broke after removing the fstab entry, check your Virtualbox version. My fstab entry was from an old Virtualbox version maybe a year or two ago prior to an upgrade. -- Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507881] Re: Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab
Virtualbox for me too. Lucid boots and Virtualbox USB now works without the fstab entry. -- Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75423] Re: pcmciautils should include driver firmware from pcmcia-cs
This looks like an easy fix. I confirm the above procedure works on debian Lenny on an old Toshiba 225cds laptop. It looks like it would work pulling the firmware from Gutsy packages too rather than earlier dapper packages but I didn't try it (they may or may not be the same firmware versions?). Do we need to ask debian to do this so it is part of what is upstream from Ubuntu? In debian Lenny, /lib/firmware was empty on a clean install but dropping NE2K.cis into /lib/firmware enabled the SOHOware ND5120-E PCMCIA ethernet card. Perhaps the other firmware packages could also be added for the other cards as well: List from http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/i386/pcmcia-cs/filelist /etc/pcmcia/cis/3CCFEM556.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/3CXEM556.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/COMpad2.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/COMpad4.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/DP83903.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/E-CARD.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/LA-PCM.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/MT5634ZLX.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/NE2K.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/PCMLM28.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/PE-200.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/PE520.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/RS-COM-2P.dat /etc/pcmcia/cis/tamarack.dat NOTE: Toshiba 225cds laptop also needs i82365 added to /etc/modules to get pcmcia working prior to the above but that is another story unrelated to what card firmware is available -- pcmciautils should include driver firmware from pcmcia-cs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75423 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
