[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
Sorry for the late reply - I was on holiday last week. The only remaining was that the updates were appearing twice - under the normal updates section and under the greyed out Pro updates section. We have discussed this internally and have decided that it's not really an issue. So, we're happy with the latest version in the ppa. My colleague has closed the support ticket with the same info. Are you happy to release this fix into the normal update channel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
Sorry, I did mean "to be updated". To clarify what I meant by the duplicate update issue, I have attached another screenshot. The python3-pip package is showing in the "Other updates" section and also in the (disabled) Ubuntu Pro security updates section. It's the same versions in both sections InStalled version: 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10 Available version: 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2 ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-10-03 10-55-34.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5824441/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-10-03%2010-55-34.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
I've now installed 4:20.69 Unfortunately, it's showing duplicate entries for updated packages that are in upstream ESM and also in our staged repos. The highlighted package in the screenshot is also one of the "Python package installer" updates in the "Other updates" section. I think that's going to be confusing for users. The behaviour of 4:20.66 which showed the Ubuntu Pro security updates (coming from our staged repos) in a separate section was preferable. Ideally, we would like a flag that we can set that would stop software updater from showing anything that it's found in upstream ESM. We would be happy with the default being that they're shown, but we could configure it to turn off that section. Is that something that's possible please? ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-10-02 12-25-53.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5824138/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-10-02%2012-25-53.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
I don;t think we've pinned it - it's just not seeing the +esm3 package: # apt policy python2.7-minimal python2.7-minimal: Installed: 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 Candidate: 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 Version table: *** 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 500 500 http://landscape.nowhere.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu devclient-focal-staging-apps-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.7.18-1~20.04.4 500 500 http://landscape.nowhere.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu devclient-focal-staging-updates/universe amd64 Packages 2.7.18-1~20.04.3 500 500 http://landscape.nowhere.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu devclient-focal-staging-security/universe amd64 Packages 2.7.18~rc1-2 500 500 http://landscape.nowhere.com/repository/standalone/ubuntu devclient-focal-staging/universe amd64 Packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
Morning Nathan, apt wasn't offering the python2-minimal patch: # apt list --upgradable Listing... Done google-chrome-stable/stable 129.0.6668.89-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 128.0.6613.113-1] krb5-locales/devclient-focal-staging-updates,devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 all [upgradable from: 1.17-6ubuntu4.6] libgssapi-krb5-2/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.17-6ubuntu4.6] libk5crypto3/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.17-6ubuntu4.6] libkrb5-3/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.17-6ubuntu4.6] libkrb5support0/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.17-6ubuntu4.6] libnss-systemd/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] libpam-systemd/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] libpcap0.8/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.9.1-3] libpython3.12-minimal/focal 3.12.7-1+focal1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.12.4-1+focal1] libpython3.12-stdlib/focal 3.12.7-1+focal1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.12.4-1+focal1] libsystemd0/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] libudev1/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] microsoft-edge-stable/stable 129.0.2792.65-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 128.0.2739.54-1] nautilus-share/devclient-focal-staging-updates,devclient-focal-staging-security 0.7.3-2ubuntu3.1 amd64 [upgradable from: 0.7.3-2ubuntu3] python-pip-whl/devclient-focal-staging-apps-security,devclient-focal-staging-apps-security 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2 all [upgradable from: 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10] python3-pip/devclient-focal-staging-apps-security,devclient-focal-staging-apps-security 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2 all [upgradable from: 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10] python3-update-manager/focal,focal 4:20.67 all [upgradable from: 4:20.66] python3.12-minimal/focal 3.12.7-1+focal1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.12.4-1+focal1] python3.12-venv/focal 3.12.7-1+focal1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.12.4-1+focal1] python3.12/focal 3.12.7-1+focal1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.12.4-1+focal1] shim-signed/devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.40.10+15.8-0ubuntu1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.40.9+15.7-0ubuntu1] systemd-sysv/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] systemd-timesyncd/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] systemd/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] terraform/focal 1.9.6-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.8.5-1] ubuntu-advantage-tools/devclient-focal-staging-updates,devclient-focal-staging-updates 34~20.04 all [upgradable from: 32.3.1~20.04] ubuntu-pro-client-l10n/devclient-focal-staging-updates 34~20.04 amd64 [upgradable from: 33.2~20.04] ubuntu-pro-client/devclient-focal-staging-updates 34~20.04 amd64 [upgradable from: 33.2~20.04] udev/devclient-focal-staging-updates 245.4-4ubuntu3.24 amd64 [upgradable from: 245.4-4ubuntu3.23] update-manager-core/focal,focal 4:20.67 all [upgradable from: 4:20.66] update-manager/focal,focal 4:20.67 all [upgradable from: 4:20.66] vault-enterprise/focal 1.17.6+ent-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.16.6+ent-1] /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20apt-esm-hook.conf looks pretty standard, but it's not offering upstream ESM channels/patches. I'll wait for 4.20.68 to build and then give that a go. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
I think I know why the Python2.7 packages are showing like that. In the current cut of our ESM Landscape staged repos, we have Python 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2, but version 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3 is available directly from upstream ESM, even though ESM isn't enabled in UA pro. That's the same behaviour as before. For the python3-pip package that's showing nicely under the new Ubuntu Pro security updates section, that represents a move from a standard package to an ESM package that IS in our staged cut of ESM: python3-pip/devclient-focal-staging-apps-security,devclient-focal- staging-apps-security 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2 all [upgradable from: 20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10] What we'd really like is for software updater to not show ESM packages that are only in upstream ESM if that's possible please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
** Attachment added: "Standard package" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5823738/+files/update-manager%201%3A20.04.10.21.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
** Attachment added: "update-manager 4:20.66.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5823739/+files/update-manager%204%3A20.66.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
Nathen, I've tested your patch on my laptop (used for the original report above) and there's definitely an improvement, however the prompt to enable still shows. See attached screenshots of standard vs your version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081 Title: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.
# ua security-status --format=json | jq .
{
"_schema_version": "0.1",
"livepatch": {
"fixed_cves": []
},
"packages": [
{
"download_size": 1274208,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "python2.7-minimal",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3"
},
{
"download_size": 248228,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "python2.7",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3"
},
{
"download_size": 230504,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "python3-pip",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2"
},
{
"download_size": 335660,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "libpython2.7-minimal",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3"
},
{
"download_size": 1886160,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "libpython2.7-stdlib",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3"
},
{
"download_size": 1808744,
"origin": "esm.ubuntu.com",
"package": "python-pip-whl",
"service_name": "esm-apps",
"status": "pending_enable",
"version": "20.0.2-5ubuntu1.10+esm2"
}
],
"summary": {
"num_esm_apps_packages": 0,
"num_esm_apps_updates": 6,
"num_esm_infra_packages": 0,
"num_esm_infra_updates": 0,
"num_installed_packages": 2043,
"num_main_packages": 0,
"num_multiverse_packages": 0,
"num_restricted_packages": 0,
"num_standard_security_updates": 0,
"num_third_party_packages": 2029,
"num_universe_packages": 0,
"num_unknown_packages": 14,
"reboot_required": "no",
"ua": {
"attached": true,
"enabled_services": [],
"entitled_services": [
"esm-apps",
"esm-infra"
]
}
}
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083081
Title:
Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by
software updater.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874635] Re: Guest session throws an apparmor denial
I suggest that this be pushed out to the non-proposed repository. This is the kind of bug that pushes users back to the mainstream in droves. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874635 Title: Guest session throws an apparmor denial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/874635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387161] Re: JMicron drive 152d:{2329, 2338, 2339} cause USB resets on ATA smart probing
I just ran into this situation too:
Feb 5 02:48:28 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.220053] usb 2-1: new full speed USB
device using ohci_hcd and address 32
Feb 5 02:48:28 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.400385] usb 2-1: device descriptor
read/64, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:29 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.690035] usb 2-1: device descriptor
read/64, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:29 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.980039] usb 2-1: new full speed USB
device using ohci_hcd and address 33
Feb 5 02:48:29 terrorbite kernel: [ 1479.160866] usb 2-1: device descriptor
read/64, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:30 terrorbite kernel: [ 1479.450878] usb 2-1: device descriptor
read/64, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:30 terrorbite kernel: [ 1479.740931] usb 2-1: new full speed USB
device using ohci_hcd and address 34
Feb 5 02:48:30 terrorbite kernel: [ 1480.160031] usb 2-1: device not accepting
address 34, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:30 terrorbite kernel: [ 1480.340098] usb 2-1: new full speed USB
device using ohci_hcd and address 35
Feb 5 02:48:31 terrorbite kernel: [ 1480.760017] usb 2-1: device not accepting
address 35, error -62
Feb 5 02:48:31 terrorbite kernel: [ 1480.760030] hub 2-0:1.0: unable to
enumerate USB device on port 1
It turned out that the plug was not pushed fully home at the computer
home.
I assume that one or both of the data lines were not making contact.
Sooo ... check your cables and connections before getting too keen on
hacking at your system.
There would probably be some value in the drivers checking for the
possibility of broken data lines and reporting them to the user.
Something like "Data error on USB device. Check your cables and
connections."
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387161
Title:
JMicron drive 152d:{2329,2338,2339} cause USB resets on ATA smart
probing
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625111] Re: lpstat default destination of two minds
$ cat ~/.cups/lpoptions Default hplj5l _kde-filters=true $ The others are lost. A number of points come to mind: - lpr (the failure of which brought me to this point) and lpstat should moan if the lpoptions files reference non-existent printers. - they should fail in a manner which tends to work rather than not work. - old lpoptions files, especially /etc/cups/lpoptions, should be sanitised by cups on package upgrade and configuration - the conflict between ~/.lpoptions and ~/.cups/lpoptions needs to be analysed and resolved -- lpstat default destination of two minds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625111] Re: lpstat default destination of two minds
Before filing this bug I had already removed /etc/cups/lpoptions and ~/.lpoptions Removing ~/.cups/lpoptions has restored the desired operation. See: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3503 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481481 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565569 I still consider the inconsistent output a bug and can't tell if it's fixed upstream. ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #481481 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481481 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #565569 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565569 -- lpstat default destination of two minds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625111] [NEW] lpstat default destination of two minds
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups $ lpstat -d no system default destination $ lpstat -s system default destination: HP_LaserJet_5L device for HP_LaserJet_5L: parallel:/dev/lp0 $ cups version 1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- lpstat default destination of two minds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups
Wups, that should be #463471 -- [karmic] Upstart fixups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups
I found that the reason that my system was being taken down was a crude reload script in /usr/local/sbin which I had written before the introduction of upstart. Perhaps reload should be called using the explicit path ie. /usr/sbin/reload. Similarly, the explicit path for cron has been removed causing the logrotate rule designed to filter out routine cron jobs to fail, see #435893 -- [karmic] Upstart fixups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435893] Re: logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload
Ignore me. The problem was a version of reload in /usr/local/sbin which I wrote before the introduction of upstart. -- logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435893] Re: logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload
For me this is a critical bug as it takes my machine down every day. Some time after booting my machine every morning it is consumed by a recursive explosion of reload and rsysklogd tasks. The attached file shows the first 300 tasks as reported by 'ps auxf'. I snaffled this as soon as possible but the original already shows over 4000 tasks and the original file is 31MB. I'm sure there's enough there to get the idea. ** Attachment added: "ps auxf" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38864965/psxx-300.txt -- logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups
This system is suffering random take downs most days by a gales of 'reload' and 'rsyslog' tasks which multiply until swap space is exhausted. After that I dunno what happens. -- [karmic] Upstart fixups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run
Achim: try mem=190M, I know that that much memory was demonstrating the problem for me and also that it boots up into gnome, albiet slowly. I tried to load the packages from -proposed when they were announced but it didn't want to work. As far as I could tell it was because they were not in the archive at that time, however it could also be because I had the packages from Michael's development repository. I will try again when the opportunity arises. -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run
** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run
Adding Michael's PPA to my sources.list, then updating and upgrading with aptitude appears to have sorted this out on this machine. The following packages have been kept back: synaptic [0.61ubuntu9 -> 0.62.1ubuntu1~ppa2] The following packages will be upgraded: f-spot [0.4.3.1-0ubuntu1 -> 0.4.3.1-0ubuntu2~ppa1] friendly-recovery [0.1.2 -> 0.2~ppa1] libgksu2-0 [2.0.5-1ubuntu5.1 -> 2.0.7-1ubuntu2.1] python-apt [0.7.4ubuntu7 -> 0.7.5ubuntu2~ppa1] update-manager [1:0.87.27 -> 1:0.91.6] update-manager-core [1:0.87.27 -> 1:0.91.6] update-notifier [0.70.7 -> 0.70.8~ppa1] update-notifier-common [0.70.7 -> 0.70.8~ppa1] Thanks Michael. -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160413] Re: Wake on LAN (WOL) not working with r8169 driver on Gutsy
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux- networking-3/realtek-813981688169-on-2.6.21.3-or-newer-593495/ speaks of a setting in Windows XP which prevents same from leaving the NIC in a state from which the linux drivers cannot recover. That all said I am suspicious of network-manager given the reports that this problem only emerges when the full gui is booted. -- Wake on LAN (WOL) not working with r8169 driver on Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server
** Tags added: patch -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run
The machines I've seen this on are also RAM starved. -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run
> Could you please try the package of libgksu2-0 in hardy-proposed ? It hopefully fixes the problem. Can you give a link to the .deb ? I'd rather not add hardy-proposed to sources.list, but I'm happy to install the single package. Less variables that way. This is a pretty nasty bug, it prevents many newbies from upgrading their systems. -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234290] Re: After Locking Firewall Firestarter freezes and cannot be unlocked
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 184017 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 184017 [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server -- After Locking Firewall Firestarter freezes and cannot be unlocked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server
This wee patch makes firestarter work again. Someone clueful needs to look this over. ** Attachment added: "firestarter-wont-unlock.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15484920/firestarter-wont-unlock.diff -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241520] [NEW] [Hardy] Typo: Suggests svn-buildpacakge
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts Suggested packages: cvs-buildpackage devscripts-el gnuplot mutt svn-buildpacakge This begs the question: should suggested package names be sanity checked? devscripts: Installed: 2.10.26ubuntu3~hardy1 ** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Hardy] Typo: Suggests svn-buildpacakge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server
Adding rules to the locked firewall to log packets showed these connection attempts on attempting to unlock: Jun 19 15:29:42 kotuku kernel: [546262.683765] IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=37291 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=58463 DPT=16001 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Jun 19 15:30:06 kotuku kernel: [546286.682588] IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=37292 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=58463 DPT=16001 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Jun 19 15:30:54 kotuku kernel: [546334.680286] IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=37293 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=58463 DPT=16001 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Jun 19 15:32:30 kotuku kernel: [546430.675667] IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=37294 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=58463 DPT=16001 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 lsof then revealed: firestart 19833root 15u IPv4 93038 TCP localhost:59731->localhost:16001 (SYN_SENT) Port 16001 is used by esound so I assume firestarter is failing to cope with it's inability to contact the sound server which it has been walled off by firestarter. Perhaps firestarter should add rules to allow traffic from localhost to localhost before setting all the table policies to DENY. -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #479224 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479224 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479224 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
I think I can make sense of and confirm this report. Using "Update Manager" in the GUI or "do-release-upgrade" from the command line fails after displaying a list of software no longer supported by Canonical. In the GUI clicking on the "Close" button aborts the upgrade and restores the system to it's original state. Using the command line interface the same list of software is displayed and the upgrade is then aborted with no further opportunity for user input. This is a bit of a show stopper, preventing me from upgrading from Gutsy to Feisty. A couple of less important problems I noticed during this process: - there seems to be an unnecessary retrieval of the package indices - one of the status lines fails to clear to eol resulting in some slightly ugly lines: "Reading package lists: Donefeisty-security/universe Packages: 963 " ** Attachment added: "Command line log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12151399/do-release-upgrade.txt -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail
I'm sorry but I can't test this fix. I have no idea where that machine came from or went to. -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/main_pre_req.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283050/main_pre_req.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283046/main.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
# ls -l /var/log/dist-upgrade/ total 104 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2583 2008-02-21 22:16 apt-autoinst-fixup.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 82989 2008-02-22 17:42 apt.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8005 2008-02-22 17:42 main.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1375 2008-02-22 17:39 main_pre_req.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2008-02-22 16:25 term.log # ** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-autoinst-fixup.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283038/apt-autoinst-fixup.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
Further information: Dapper was installed on this machine and manually dist-upgraded to Edgy without major drama. The dist-upgrade to Feisty was done using update-manager and again went smoothly. ** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283028/apt.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade
** Changed in: update-manager-core (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59557] Re: horizontal off by one error
Fair call. Sorry about the lack of feedback. I was unable to secure the hardware to test the solution. -- horizontal off by one error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail
** Attachment added: "/proc/acpi/dsdt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7216513/20070408148-dsdt -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail
** Attachment added: "dmidecode" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7216510/200704081447-dmidecode.txt -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail
I'm seeing this on an Acer Extensa 2303LC. /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-12-generic installed by a very recent Feisty install snapshot works fine but the first upgraded kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-14-generic exhibits the * Loading ACPI modules... hang described by others except that blacklist video has no effect and removing quiet splash allows the booting process to survive but doesn't start the gui. splash alone demonstrates the hang ** Attachment added: "dmesg with nasty bugses" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7216508/200704081443-dmesg.txt -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103973] Re: audacity not installable in Feisty
Sorry about that - something seems to be playing the fool with my repository indices. If I find out what I'll advise further. -- audacity not installable in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103973] audacity not installable in Feisty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacity This on a spanking new feisty install: depends on libjack*? and a three other virtual packages. ** Affects: audacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- audacity not installable in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 12937] Re: Can't deliver mail through mixed IPv4/IPv6 smarthost
I've encountered this failure in a different context. This machine uses a PCMCIA ethernet card for connectivity. Postfix is configured as a satellite system. After several weeks running during which time I reconfigured eth0 to use a static ip address rather than dhcp, resolvconf presented me with a null /etc/resolv.conf on rebooting. Correcting the file and restarting networking did not solve the problem although don't think I restarted postfix. Perhaps postfix shouldn't remember the dns setup independantly of the OS. I am not on good terms with resolvconf. The MX record for my isp, clear.net.nz, points to mx.clear.net.nz while they advertise their smtp server as smtp.clear.net.nz which is set as relayhost in postfix. There is no MX record listed for smtp.clear.net.nz or mx.clear.net.nz. ... (delivery temporarily suspended: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=smtp.clear.net.nz type=MX: Host not found, try again) /etc/network/interfaces had 'auto eth0' at the end of the file rather than before the eth0 stanza so I moved that to it's traditional location and added 'allow-hotplug eth0' as well before reloading networking, hoping that this would improve detection of the pcmcia card on boot. On restarting postfix mail delivery resumed. Some of these things are likely red herrings and the aetiology of my experience may not be the same as that of the original reporter. There are no IPV6 routers present. Further analysis delayed due to lack of sleep. -- Can't deliver mail through mixed IPv4/IPv6 smarthost https://launchpad.net/bugs/12937 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 38977] Re: When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible
When addressing this bug it may be worth considering adding a "Recommends: inetutils-inetd|xinetd" (can't trust that syntax) to samba too as it puts the following line into /etc/inetd.conf when no inetd is installed: ## netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/smbd Please note also the file in duplicate bug #50642 which may be worth including in the package for those who elect to use xinetd instead of inetutils-inetd. -- When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible https://launchpad.net/bugs/38977 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 50642] Re: swat and xinetd
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 38977 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 38977 When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible -- swat and xinetd https://launchpad.net/bugs/50642 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67495] Re: swat needs xinetd
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 38977 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 38977 When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible -- swat needs xinetd https://launchpad.net/bugs/67495 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59557] horizontal off by one error
Public bug reported: Running aviplayer under dapper on a toshiba satellite 2550cdt (~200MHz ~200MB 800x600) gives an apparent off by one error which manifests as a vertical line of not quite randomly changing coloured pixels down the right hand margin. This happens whether the window is maximised or not. Putting another window over the active video window results in the anomalous vertical line appearing at the left edge over the overlaying window. This does not happen on other computers running dapper here. I would flag this as a security vulnerability because I don't know that this doesn't result in memory corruption at the left hand edge and because I don't know where the data which is filling the rightmost column is coming from however the package is from "universe" and I understand that such a flag would be ignored. I'm more than happy to poke about for more information, but you'll need to tell me where. ** Affects: avifile (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- horizontal off by one error https://launchpad.net/bugs/59557 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
