[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to Markus Wernig from comment #104)
> I think the correct statement to issue in this case would be that a part
> ("revision") of the PDF has been signed and to show the validation result
> for that revision, ideally giving the user a chance to view only the signed
> part.
>
> This might even be indispensable when there are multiple signatures applied
> to the document.
So one idea could be to also use the first offset when checking the
signature and in case it is not zero instead of return the status as
SIGNATURE_VALID say something like "SIGNATURE_PARTLY_VALID".
The pdfsig tool already implements support for multiple
signatures/"revisions" but it seems the API does not expose the
ByteRange for which the signature covers nor provides an other way to
obtain that revision of the document (?).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526
Title:
ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
Created attachment 120760 Considering offset 0 and signature only covering part of PDF Note that this patch has not been tested with a non-zero first offset document. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
Created attachment 120760 Considering offset 0 and signature only covering part of PDF Note that this patch has not been tested with a non-zero first offset document. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Markus Wernig from comment #104)
> I think the correct statement to issue in this case would be that a part
> ("revision") of the PDF has been signed and to show the validation result
> for that revision, ideally giving the user a chance to view only the signed
> part.
>
> This might even be indispensable when there are multiple signatures applied
> to the document.
So one idea could be to also use the first offset when checking the
signature and in case it is not zero instead of return the status as
SIGNATURE_VALID say something like "SIGNATURE_PARTLY_VALID".
The pdfsig tool already implements support for multiple
signatures/"revisions" but it seems the API does not expose the
ByteRange for which the signature covers nor provides an other way to
obtain that revision of the document (?).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
Created attachment 120758 Fix printf for unsigned int In pdfsig.cc the NetBeans IDE gave warning: Mismatching the argument type "unsigned int" and conversion specifier "d" The attached patch changes from %d to %u in the printf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
Created attachment 120758 Fix printf for unsigned int In pdfsig.cc the NetBeans IDE gave warning: Mismatching the argument type "unsigned int" and conversion specifier "d" The attached patch changes from %d to %u in the printf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #102) > So we're stuck on "need to use the offset" part, right? > > Could someone try to do make the code use it even if we don't have any pdf > that needs it? I am not sure if it is good to apply the robustness principle on security functions. In those cases it might be better to be defensive and reject signatures not following the recommendation. In this case if the ByteRange does not cover the whole document there could be parts of the document that can be modified without invalidating the signature. Would it then be good to tell the user that the signature has been validated and the document is not modified even though in fact there are parts of the document for which we don't know? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #102) > So we're stuck on "need to use the offset" part, right? > > Could someone try to do make the code use it even if we don't have any pdf > that needs it? I am not sure if it is good to apply the robustness principle on security functions. In those cases it might be better to be defensive and reject signatures not following the recommendation. In this case if the ByteRange does not cover the whole document there could be parts of the document that can be modified without invalidating the signature. Would it then be good to tell the user that the signature has been validated and the document is not modified even though in fact there are parts of the document for which we don't know? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
Created attachment 119174 Handle SEC_ERROR_UNTRUSTED_ISSUER When verifying a PDF signed by a certificate issued by a CA not in the trust store I would expect to get an error "Certificate isn't Trusted" however currently the error message actually is the more generic "Unknown issue with Certificate or corrupted data". I tested with http://wwwpriv.primekey.se/~markus/pdfsigner/test-pdfs /signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf: [user@dev-21 utils]$ ./pdfsigverify ~/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Digital Signature Info of: /home/user/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Signature #1: - Signer Certificate Common Name: Signer 2 - Signing Time: Nov 23 2011 17:09:42 - Signature Validation: Signature is Valid. - Certificate Validation: Unknown issue with Certificate or corrupted data. Then after adding http://wwwpriv.primekey.se/~markus/pdfsigner/test-pki /signserver-res-test-dss10/DSSRootCA10.cacert.pem as trusted in Firefox: [user@dev-21 utils]$ ./pdfsigverify ~/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Digital Signature Info of: /home/user/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Signature #1: - Signer Certificate Common Name: Signer 2 - Signing Time: Nov 23 2011 17:09:42 - Signature Validation: Signature is Valid. - Certificate Validation: Certificate is Trusted. The attached patch adds the NSS error code for untrusted issuer so the error will be "Certificate isn't trusted". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
Created attachment 119174 Handle SEC_ERROR_UNTRUSTED_ISSUER When verifying a PDF signed by a certificate issued by a CA not in the trust store I would expect to get an error "Certificate isn't Trusted" however currently the error message actually is the more generic "Unknown issue with Certificate or corrupted data". I tested with http://wwwpriv.primekey.se/~markus/pdfsigner/test-pdfs /signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf: [user@dev-21 utils]$ ./pdfsigverify ~/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Digital Signature Info of: /home/user/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Signature #1: - Signer Certificate Common Name: Signer 2 - Signing Time: Nov 23 2011 17:09:42 - Signature Validation: Signature is Valid. - Certificate Validation: Unknown issue with Certificate or corrupted data. Then after adding http://wwwpriv.primekey.se/~markus/pdfsigner/test-pki /signserver-res-test-dss10/DSSRootCA10.cacert.pem as trusted in Firefox: [user@dev-21 utils]$ ./pdfsigverify ~/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Digital Signature Info of: /home/user/Downloads/signserver-res-test-pdf/sample-signed.pdf Signature #1: - Signer Certificate Common Name: Signer 2 - Signing Time: Nov 23 2011 17:09:42 - Signature Validation: Signature is Valid. - Certificate Validation: Certificate is Trusted. The attached patch adds the NSS error code for untrusted issuer so the error will be "Certificate isn't trusted". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #91) > What is the output of "pkg-config --cflags nss"? [user@dev-21 poppler]$ pkg-config --cflags nss -I/usr/include/nss3 -I/usr/include/nspr4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #91) > What is the output of "pkg-config --cflags nss"? [user@dev-21 poppler]$ pkg-config --cflags nss -I/usr/include/nss3 -I/usr/include/nspr4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
I'm trying to build the branch (on Fedora 21) but obviously I am missing some dependency or not having the right versions etc. Anyone having an idea? Build output: --- [user@dev-21 poppler]$ sudo yum install nspr-devel Loaded plugins: langpacks, post-transaction-actions, yum-qubes-hooks Package nspr-devel-4.10.8-1.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do [user@dev-21 poppler]$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' Making all in goo make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' Making all in fofi make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' Making all in splash make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' Making all in poppler make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' make all-am make[3]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' CXX libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo In file included from SignatureHandler.cc:15:0: SignatureHandler.h:20:24: fatal error: nspr/prprf.h: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. Makefile:1084: recipe for target 'libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo' failed make[3]: *** [libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' Makefile:840: recipe for target 'all' failed make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' Makefile:642: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' Makefile:524: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 --- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
I'm trying to build the branch (on Fedora 21) but obviously I am missing some dependency or not having the right versions etc. Anyone having an idea? Build output: --- [user@dev-21 poppler]$ sudo yum install nspr-devel Loaded plugins: langpacks, post-transaction-actions, yum-qubes-hooks Package nspr-devel-4.10.8-1.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do [user@dev-21 poppler]$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' Making all in goo make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' Making all in fofi make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' Making all in splash make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' Making all in poppler make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' make all-am make[3]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' CXX libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo In file included from SignatureHandler.cc:15:0: SignatureHandler.h:20:24: fatal error: nspr/prprf.h: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. Makefile:1084: recipe for target 'libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo' failed make[3]: *** [libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' Makefile:840: recipe for target 'all' failed make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' Makefile:642: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' Makefile:524: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 --- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #89) > (In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #88) > > I found a workaround for my build issue by creating symlinks: > > /usr/include/nspr -> /usr/include/nspr4 > > /usr/inclyde/nss -> /usr/include/nss3 > > Are you using configure or cmake? The nss pkgconfig file should contain the > correct include path. After checking out the branch I read INSTALL but did not find any ./configure so I run ./autogen.sh. It first failed for many different reasons which eventually got resolved by installing missing dependencies. After that I run the now generated ./configure and then make. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #87) > I'm trying to build the branch (on Fedora 21) but obviously I am missing > some dependency or not having the right versions etc. Anyone having an idea? > > Build output: > --- > [user@dev-21 poppler]$ sudo yum install nspr-devel > Loaded plugins: langpacks, post-transaction-actions, yum-qubes-hooks > Package nspr-devel-4.10.8-1.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version > Nothing to do > [user@dev-21 poppler]$ make > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' > Making all in goo > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' > Making all in fofi > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' > Making all in splash > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' > Making all in poppler > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > make all-am > make[3]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > CXX libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo > In file included from SignatureHandler.cc:15:0: > SignatureHandler.h:20:24: fatal error: nspr/prprf.h: No such file or > directory > #include > ^ > compilation terminated. > Makefile:1084: recipe for target 'libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo' failed > make[3]: *** [libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > Makefile:840: recipe for target 'all' failed > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > Makefile:642: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' > Makefile:524: recipe for target 'all' failed > make: *** [all] Error 2 > --- I found a workaround for my build issue by creating symlinks: /usr/include/nspr -> /usr/include/nspr4 /usr/inclyde/nss -> /usr/include/nss3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Adrian Johnson from comment #89) > (In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #88) > > I found a workaround for my build issue by creating symlinks: > > /usr/include/nspr -> /usr/include/nspr4 > > /usr/inclyde/nss -> /usr/include/nss3 > > Are you using configure or cmake? The nss pkgconfig file should contain the > correct include path. After checking out the branch I read INSTALL but did not find any ./configure so I run ./autogen.sh. It first failed for many different reasons which eventually got resolved by installing missing dependencies. After that I run the now generated ./configure and then make. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to Markus Kilås from comment #87) > I'm trying to build the branch (on Fedora 21) but obviously I am missing > some dependency or not having the right versions etc. Anyone having an idea? > > Build output: > --- > [user@dev-21 poppler]$ sudo yum install nspr-devel > Loaded plugins: langpacks, post-transaction-actions, yum-qubes-hooks > Package nspr-devel-4.10.8-1.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version > Nothing to do > [user@dev-21 poppler]$ make > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' > Making all in goo > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/goo' > Making all in fofi > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/fofi' > Making all in splash > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/splash' > Making all in poppler > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > make all-am > make[3]: Entering directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > CXX libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo > In file included from SignatureHandler.cc:15:0: > SignatureHandler.h:20:24: fatal error: nspr/prprf.h: No such file or > directory > #include > ^ > compilation terminated. > Makefile:1084: recipe for target 'libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo' failed > make[3]: *** [libpoppler_la-SignatureHandler.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > Makefile:840: recipe for target 'all' failed > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler/poppler' > Makefile:642: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/VersionControlled/poppler' > Makefile:524: recipe for target 'all' failed > make: *** [all] Error 2 > --- I found a workaround for my build issue by creating symlinks: /usr/include/nspr -> /usr/include/nspr4 /usr/inclyde/nss -> /usr/include/nss3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
There is now a new sponsor. Bounty is up to US $300. I hope there will be some more progress here soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
There is now a new sponsor. Bounty is up to US $300. I hope there will be some more progress here soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1299819] [NEW] [MacBookAir6, 2, Cirrus Logic ID 4208, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
Public bug reported: No sound through internal speakers and no sound in headphones as well. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-37.53~precise1-generic 3.8.13.18 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-37-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version k3.8.0-37-generic. ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 1: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: HDA Generic [HDA Generic] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC1: evamaria 2039 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: evamaria 2039 F pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'MID'/'HDA Intel MID at 0xb0a1 irq 66' Mixer name : 'Intel Haswell HDMI' Components : 'HDA:80862807,80860101,0010' Controls : 21 Simple ctrls : 3 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'PCH'/'HDA Intel PCH at 0xb0a14000 irq 67' Mixer name : 'Cirrus Logic ID 4208' Components : 'HDA:10134208,106b7200,00100300' Controls : 7 Simple ctrls : 3 Date: Sun Mar 30 18:20:26 2014 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20130820.2) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH failed Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel PCH Symptom_DevicesInUse: 2039 2039 evamaria F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: evamaria F pulseaudio Symptom_Jack: Speaker, Internal Symptom_Type: No sound at all Title: [MacBookAir6,2, Cirrus Logic ID 4208, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 09/27/2013 dmi.bios.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.bios.version: MBA61.88Z.0099.B04.1309271229 dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag# dmi.board.name: Mac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5 dmi.board.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.board.version: MacBookAir6,2 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Apple Inc. dmi.chassis.version: Mac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAppleInc.:bvrMBA61.88Z.0099.B04.1309271229:bd09/27/2013:svnAppleInc.:pnMacBookAir6,2:pvr1.0:rvnAppleInc.:rnMac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5:rvrMacBookAir6,2:cvnAppleInc.:ct10:cvrMac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5: dmi.product.name: MacBookAir6,2 dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: Apple Inc. ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299819 Title: [MacBookAir6,2, Cirrus Logic ID 4208, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1299819/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085526]
(In reply to comment #37) > Hi, as I cannot help with coding (on this specific issue), I've opened a > bounty on FreedomSponsors: > > http://www.freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/319/support-for-digital-signatures > > Anyone interested on this bug is welcome to pledge more money by visiting > the above link, this money will probably not be enough for the needed work > time, but I see it as a nice reward in exchange for the great contribution > that completing this bug is. Greate initiative Nelson! I also put in some coins on this one. Cheers, Markus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085526 Title: ubuntu pdf doc viewer will not let me sign a document To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/1085526/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to comment #37) > Hi, as I cannot help with coding (on this specific issue), I've opened a > bounty on FreedomSponsors: > > http://www.freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/319/support-for-digital-signatures > > Anyone interested on this bug is welcome to pledge more money by visiting > the above link, this money will probably not be enough for the needed work > time, but I see it as a nice reward in exchange for the great contribution > that completing this bug is. Greate initiative Nelson! I also put in some coins on this one. Cheers, Markus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1047009] Re: minecraft crashed uppon a user logging on
Looks like the same ZIP/JAR file related issue as in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1047009 Title: minecraft crashed uppon a user logging on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1047009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1040827] Re: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when Java reads updated jar files
Notice that this is not only related to NetBeans IDE but also affects other applications that reads JAR files such as JBoss application server when doing an hot redeploy of an Java EE application. ** Summary changed: - SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time + SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when Java reads updated jar files -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040827 Title: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when Java reads updated jar files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to comment #19) I know that LibreOffice uses NSS as when I look at digital signatures my certificates from Firefox is availble. However, I don't think the LibreOffice Ubuntu packages require the whole Firefox to be installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506 Title: verify digital signatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/740506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1040827] Re: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time
** Attachment added: "Console output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+attachment/3273892/+files/console-output.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040827 Title: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1040827] Re: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time
** Attachment added: "Hot Spot Error report" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+attachment/3273893/+files/hs_err_pid3950.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040827 Title: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1040827] [NEW] SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time
Public bug reported: 1) Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS 2) openjdk-6-jre 6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.12.04.1 openjdk-6-jdk 6b24-1.11.3-1ubuntu0.12.04.1 3) The Java application NetBeans IDE to not crash from times to time 4) The application crashes with a segmentation fault maybe two times per working day ** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040827 Title: SIGSEGV in __nss_hosts_lookup crashing OpenJDK when running NetBeans IDE from times to time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1040827/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038483] Re: Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots)
** Attachment added: "PDF Showing the incorrect characters and how they displays by Times New Roman correctly" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-linex/+bug/1038483/+attachment/3266914/+files/abecedario-latin1.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038483 Title: Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-linex/+bug/1038483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038483] [NEW] Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots)
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release:12.04 fonts-linex 2.2-6 Abecedario is displaying the Swedish character ä (a with two dots above) correctly. However for the Swedish characters å (a with ring above) and ö (o with two dots above) instead a line (accent?) is instead displayed. I would have expected the font to also display å and ö correctly. ** Affects: fonts-linex (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038483 Title: Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-linex/+bug/1038483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1038483] Re: Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots)
** Attachment added: "PNG image show correct and incorrect characters" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-linex/+bug/1038483/+attachment/3266915/+files/abecedario-latin1.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038483 Title: Abecedario not correct for Swedish characters å (a with ring) and ö (o with two dots) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-linex/+bug/1038483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615858] Re: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later
Thank you Charles, Looking in the binary package I can now confirm that ECPointUtil.class and ECNamedCurveSpec.class is available so in my opinion this issue is fixed. However as a side note, regarding the packaging of SignServer, as we discovered that that BC 1.46 broke the API and we would have to change our code, we instead decided to port it stright away to the 1.47 version. Best regards, Markus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615858 Title: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/signserver/+bug/615858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615858] Re: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later
** Also affects: signserver Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615858 Title: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/signserver/+bug/615858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615858] Re: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later
How can I help so this gets fixed? It effectively blocks packaging of the SignServer project. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615858 Title: Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bouncycastle/+bug/615858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615858] [NEW] Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later
Public bug reported: The bouncycastle packages are built using the included script jdk14.xml however that script differs from jdk15.xml or jdk16.xml in that some classes are excluded such as the ECPointUtil and ECNamedCurveSpec. If the package instead where built using jdk15.xml those classes would be included. A sample package is available in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~markuskilas/+archive/ppa ** Affects: bouncycastle (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Build bouncycastle for Java 1.5 or later https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
I can confirm that the problem still occurs on Lucid Lynx and also the workaround still works. However running "apport-collect 500578" gave: "Package openoffice.org not installed and no hook available, ignoring" -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490955] Re: ogg video player does not play after pause being used
This is really bad for free formats. We were planning on putting up webcasts in ogg-format on our company web site but as it works so bad in Firefox at the end we had to go with flash :-( -- ogg video player does not play after pause being used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
The problem seams to be related to the margins. Setting all the margins by Format -> Page -> Page to 0" the exporting is correct even for EPS. -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
Attaching the exported PDF which is ok (the right one). ** Attachment added: "Exported to PDF works" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209283/huset.pdf -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
Attaching the exported PDF which is ok. ** Attachment added: "Exported to PDF works" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209184/huset.pdf ** Attachment removed: "Exported to PDF works" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209184/huset.pdf -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
Attaching the exported EPS with layers missplaced. ** Attachment added: "Exported to EPS and not looking good." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209165/huset.eps -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] Re: OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
** Attachment added: "The OpenOffice.org Draw which can not be exported to EPS correctly." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209090/huset.odg ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209091/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37209092/XsessionErrors.txt -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500578] [NEW] OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org 1) Ubuntu 9.10 2) openoffice.org-3.1.1-5ubuntu1 3) Exporting as Enhanced PostScript (EPS) gives correct looking image (similar to that shown on the screen and the one when exporting as PDF or other format). 4) Some layers are missplaced. In the test image the sky is moved about 1 cm down and 1 cm to the right. The house and the water has moved about 1 cm down and the border around the water even further. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Dec 26 19:10:29 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1 [modified: var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb] ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- OpenOffice.org Draw export to EPS gives displaced layers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490955] Re: ogg video player does not play after pause being used
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36305321/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_Empty3_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36305322/profile_Empty3_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_Empty4_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36305323/profile_Empty4_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36305324/profiles.ini.txt -- ogg video player does not play after pause being used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490955] [NEW] ogg video player does not play after pause being used
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 Firefox built-in ogg player can not play videos after pause beeing used. 1) Ubuntu 9.10 2) Firefox 3.5.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 3) When pressing the play button after having paused an ogg video the video should start play. Also after seeking to another position and hitting play the video should play. Sample video: http://videos.mozilla.org/firefox/3.5/meet/meet.ogv 4) The video does not play instead the waiting wheel is just spinning. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Dec 1 19:15:56 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.5 3.5.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic SourcePackage: firefox-3.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic x86_64 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:3642): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:3642): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:3698): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:3665): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (gnome-panel:3662): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.3/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window ** Affects: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- ogg video player does not play after pause being used https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 472823] Re: opensc does not find card reader in karmic koala
Downgrading to the libopensc2 and opensc packages from Jaunty "solves" the problem. ** Summary changed: - opensc no longer finds card reader + opensc does not find card reader in karmic koala -- opensc does not find card reader in karmic koala https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 472823] [NEW] opensc no longer finds card reader
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: opensc 1) Ubuntu 9.10 2) opensc-0.11.8-1ubuntu1, libopensc2-0.11.8-1ubuntu1 3) Expecting a result like this when running an older version: $ opensc-explorer OpenSC Explorer version 0.11.4 Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory OpenSC [3F00]> Which is okey (ignore the warnings). 4) What instead happens is this: $ opensc-explorer OpenSC Explorer version 0.11.8 Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory [opensc-explorer] reader-pcsc.c:1015:pcsc_detect_readers: returning with: No readers found Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Error: can't open /var/run/openct/status: No such file or directory Card not present. Notice the line saying that there is "No readers found". Running "pcsc_scan" shows the connected reader and a lot of information from the card so there is no problem with pcsc or the card or the card reader. ** Affects: opensc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- opensc no longer finds card reader https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] Re: segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 346691 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346691 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 346691 2.6.28-11 causes massive data corruption on 64 bit installations -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246100] Re: [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document
The problem seems to be with the 64-bit version as OOO 300m15 build 9379 works fine on Ubuntu 9.04 x86 but not with Ubuntu 9.04 amd64. -- [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246100] Re: [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document
I have the same problem with Jaunty amd64 and openoffice.org- core-1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 but not with 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2.1 on an Ubuntu 8.04 x86 where it seems to work fine. -- [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246100] Re: [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document
I agree with Mathieu Alorent this bug is not the same as the issue described in #61384. -- [upstream] Unable to digitally sign document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] Re: segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
** Attachment added: "crash5_messages.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26850837/crash5_messages.txt -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] Re: segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
** Attachment added: "crash4_gdb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26850799/crash4_gdb.txt -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] Re: segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
** Attachment added: "crash3_dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26850795/crash3_dmesg.txt -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] Re: segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
** Attachment added: "crash2_messages.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26850763/crash2_messages.txt -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 377530] [NEW] segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Jaunty when booting with the 2.6.28 kernel some applications starts to crash in different ways and sometimes resulting in that the computer freezes. Booting with 2.6.27 there is none of those problems. 1) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 $ uname -a Linux markuz 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:58:03 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux 2) $ apt-cache policy linux-image-generic linux-image-generic: Installed: 2.6.28.11.15 Candidate: 2.6.28.11.15 Version table: *** 2.6.28.11.15 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ apt-cache policy firefox firefox: Installed: 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 Candidate: 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 Version table: *** 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages $ apt-cache policy thunderbird thunderbird: Installed: 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 Candidate: 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 Version table: *** 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) What I expected to happen: Firefox and thunderbird should run without crashing as when using the 2.6.27 kernel. 4) What happened instead: After some (random) time firefox and thunderbird (and sometimes some other applications but I have not been able to reproduce that) stops working either by a segfault, illegal instruction, trap invalid op code, dumping ftrace and/or computer freeze with or without flashing caps/scroll lock buttons. Crash 1) $ firefox Some pages loaded then the computer freezed with Caps lock and scroll lock flashing. Pressed the power button to shutdown. Nothing special in /var/log/messages. Last message was: May 16 17:26:59 markuz syslogd 1.5.0#5ubuntu3: restart. Crash 2) $ firefox After some longer time the computer freezed again, this time without flashing lights. This time with ftrace buffer dumpted in syslog. Crash 3) $ firefox Directly after choosen firefox profile: Illegal instruction $ firefox Illegal instruction $ firefox Illegal instruction Got 2 invalid opcode messages in dmesg. $ thunderbird& [2] 5355 After looked at some e-mails: Segmentation fault [2]+ Exit 139thunderbird $ thunderbird & [2] 5604 Segmentation fault [2]+ Exit 139thunderbird $ thunderbird & Segmentation fault [2]+ Exit 139thunderbird I rebooted Ubuntu using the menu as I could not use firefox and thunderbird. Crash 4) $ firefox After choosen firefox profile: [2]+ Segmentation fault firefox $ firefox & [2] 5104 [2]+ Segmentation fault firefox $ firefox & [2] 5118 [2]+ Segmentation fault firefox $ gdb /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.10/firefox (see attachment) gdb crashed with Segmentation fault /var/log/messages: May 16 19:00:06 markuz kernel: [ 897.120652] gdb[5189]: segfault at 0 ip 0046b557 sp 7fff7581b028 error 6 in gdb[40+36] May 16 19:01:02 markuz kernel: [ 953.392252] gdb[5435]: segfault at 0 ip 0046b557 sp 7fffda8df118 error 6 in gdb[40+36] Crash 5) $ firefox & After some longer time (had time to almost write the whole bugreport) the computer freezed with flashing caps and scroll lock. Some ACPI errors and this in syslog: [ 1299.617487] npviewer.bin[6006]: segfault at ff9bea2c ip ff9bea2c sp ffa0880c error 14 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segfaults in firefox, thunderbird, computer freezes and illegal instructions with 2.6.28-11-generic kernel in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354085] Re: ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off
Hi Leann, Booting with acpi.power_nocheck=1 seems to work. The error messages are no longer in the log. Thanks ** Attachment added: "acpi.power_nocheck dmesg output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24762589/dmesg.log -- ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354085] [NEW] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off
Public bug reported: My syslogs are filled wit the following error message: ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D3 ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [88013fa3aec0] 'off' Even when the fan is turned off the messages continues. The output from lsmod shows that both the fan module is not used, perhaps that is the problem? System: Ubuntu 8.10 Linux markuz 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Laptop: Zepto Nox A15 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic 2.6.27-11.27 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/mapper/hostname-rootvol ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-11.27-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 354085] Re: ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off
** Attachment added: "dmesg output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709597/dmesg.log ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709598/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709599/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709600/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709601/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "LsUsb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709603/LsUsb.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709604/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709605/ProcCpuInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709606/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709609/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment removed: "dmesg output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24709597/dmesg.log -- ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device off https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354085 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] Re: Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
I changed the BIOS setting from AHCI to ATA and now I can boot Ubuntu and there is no Emask exceptions in the syslog. This works for me right now but shouldn't AHCI work? -- Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] Re: Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
** Attachment added: "hdparm output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24696912/hdparm.txt.gz -- Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] Re: Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
** Attachment added: "lshw output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24696847/lshw.txt.gz -- Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] Re: Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
** Attachment added: "lspci -v output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24696777/lspci_v.txt.gz -- Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] Re: Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
** Attachment added: "dmesg output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24696684/dmesg.txt.gz -- Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353812] [NEW] Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
Public bug reported:
During boot I get several error messages like this below on my new
laptop:
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
ata1.00: cmd 60/08:00:0f:0a:74/00:00:02:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 in
res 50/00:b8:df:08:0d/00:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: status: { DRDY }
Sometimes there is just a few and after some time the boot continues and
I can use the laptop but more often the messages repeats and the boot
finally ends with the root partition mounted as read-only.
With dmesg I can also see that I got:
ata1.00: NCQ disabled due to excessive errors
ata1: hard resetting link
And a lot of this (but this might be an other issue):
ACPI: Transitioning device [FAN] to D3
ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [88013fa3aec0] 'off'
System:
Ubuntu 8.10
Linux markuz 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
Laptop: Zepto Nox A15
Harddrive: Hitachi HTS72322
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Multiple ATA Exception Emask, NCQ disabled etc during boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353654] Re: package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9
After doing a "sudo apt-get -f install" it seems to work now. -- package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353654] Re: package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24664210/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353654] [NEW] package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9
Public bug reported: 1) Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 2) sun-java6-jre_6-10-0ubuntu2_all sun-java6-bin_6-10-0ubuntu2_amd64 3) Should install Ubuntu restricted extras. 4) Error message that the packages mentioned in (2) failed with error exit status 9. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9 Package: sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] SourcePackage: sun-java6 Title: package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package sun-java6-bin 6-10-0ubuntu2 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sun-java6-bin.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313504] [NEW] Scanimage/usbfs device IO error with Canon MP700 scanner
Public bug reported: Scanimage fails: $ scanimage P6 # SANE data follows 638 877 255 scanimage: sane_read: Error during device I/O In dmesg: [22955.082523] usb 1-1.2: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by usblp while 'scanimage' sets config #1 [22956.440402] usb 1-1.2: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by usblp while 'scanimage' sets config #1 [22956.442197] usb 1-1.2: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by usblp while 'scanimage' sets config #1 [22956.656083] usb 1-1.2: usbfs: process 13214 (scanimage) did not claim interface 0 before use [22956.657216] usb 1-1.2: usbfs: process 13214 (scanimage) did not claim interface 0 before use Ubuntu: 8.10 libsane: 1.0.19-6ubuntu1 sane-utils: 1.0.19-6ubuntu1 xsane: 0.995-3ubuntu2 $ scanimage -L & lsusb Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04d9:a015 Holtek Semiconductor, Inc. Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 006: ID 04a9:2630 Canon, Inc. MultiPASS MP700 Bus 001 Device 005: ID 05a9:a518 OmniVision Technologies, Inc. D-Link DSB-C310 WebCam Bus 001 Device 004: ID 07b8:e004 D-Link Corp. Mass Storage Device Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0409:0058 NEC Corp. HighSpeed Hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub device `pixma:04A92630_0001D372' is a CANON Canon MultiPASS MP700 multi-function peripheral ** Affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Scanimage/usbfs device IO error with Canon MP700 scanner https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311960] Re: Aptitude does not accept "J" as in "Ja" (swedish for yes)
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20780878/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20780879/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20780880/ProcStatus.txt -- Aptitude does not accept "J" as in "Ja" (swedish for yes) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311960] [NEW] Aptitude does not accept "J" as in "Ja" (swedish for yes)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude 1. Ubuntu 8.10 2. Aptitude 0.4.11.3-1ubuntu3 3. What I did and expected to happen: sudo aptitude install monodevelop Aptitude asks if it should continue which in Swedish is: Vill du fortsätta? [J/n/?] I pressed "J" for yes and expected it to continue. 4. What happened instead: Ogiltigt svar. Ange ett giltigt kommando eller "?" för hjälp. (Swedish for: Illegal answer...) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: gnome-terminal 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-terminal Uname: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic i686 ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Aptitude does not accept "J" as in "Ja" (swedish for yes) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
