[Bug 572706] [NEW] openJDK doesn't run 'MOCCA' correct
Public bug reported: 1) Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 2) openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 3) feature wish: MOCCA (Modular Open Citizen Card Architecture) just works with standard JRE 4) MOCCA only supports Sun JRE 1.6.0 update 04 [1,2] If I recall right I already had to install Oracle's JRE for installation. I leaved openJDK as is which means command 'javaws' still linked to openJDK? Program started and seemed to work: within Help and PIN-management no error was detected by me though I didn't try management intensively out. Afterwards I started Firefox and tried to login at easybank.at which uses "a.trust approved services" [3,German] in combination with my citizen card. This resulted in a "ssl_error_internal_error_alert" shown by Firefox. So I completely removed packages of openJDK which only left java-6-sun and clicked the already existing desktop icon of MOCCA to start the program. - MOCCA seems to "reinstall" itself every time clicking this icon. Anyhow command changed from "javaws" to "/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.20/jre/bin/javaws" and login at my bank does fine now. Clemens Orthacker stated 2010-03-22 that another problem "seems to be related to unsupported tray icon (which seems to work with a current version of openJDK, however)" [4]. EGovLabs lists MOCCA requirements on the Java platform with hints for issues with openJDK [1] This issue isn't top priority to me as Oracle's JRE does fine, though MOCCA with OSS Java would be fine in the long-run plus I think it's rather an upstream issue. Greetings Martin -- [1] http://egovlabs.gv.at/plugins/wiki/index.php?Java%20platform%20requirements&id=13&type=g [2] http://egovlabs.gv.at/projects/mocca/ [3] http://www.a-trust.at/info.aspx?node=419 [4] http://egovlabs.gv.at/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=532&group_id=13&atid=134 ad [4] trustDesk Basic is an alternative for MOCCA but it isn't OSS and support is discontinued due to preference of MOCCA. People with new citizen card (E-Card) already can't use trustDesk basic anymore - but they may by trustDesk professional. ** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- openJDK doesn't run 'MOCCA' correct https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: linux-source Sound does well with kernel 2.6.24-11-generic from release 8.04 alpha 6 but the new kernel 2.6.24-12-generic has an issue with the Azalia-chip, though lspci shows it recognised. But have a look at dmesg. + + + --- + Error Message from GNOME's Volume Control: + 'The volume control did not find any elements and/or devices to control. + This means either that you don't have the right GStreamer plugins installed, + or that you don't have a sound card configured.' + + Clicking "Open Volume Control": + 'No volume control GStreamer plugins and/or devices found.' + + System is + + Gigabyte Mainboard GA-MA790FX-DS5 (rev. 1.0) + +PowerColor HD3850 grafic card + + AMD 64 X2 5200+ 2,7GHz http://www.amdcompare.com/de-de/desktop/details.aspx?opn=ADO5200IAA5DO + + running x86 Linux -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "output of 'uname -a'" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556415/uname-a_2.6.24-12.log -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "proc_asound_cards_2.6.24-11.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556408/proc_asound_cards_2.6.24-11.txt -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "dmesg_2.6.24-11.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556402/dmesg_2.6.24-11.txt -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "lspci_2.6.24-11.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556391/lspci_2.6.24-11.log -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 Now the old logs: ** Attachment added: "alsa-info_2.6.24-11.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556382/alsa-info_2.6.24-11.txt -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "dmesg_2.6.24-12.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556336/dmesg_2.6.24-12.txt -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "lspci_2.6.24-12.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556332/lspci_2.6.24-12.log -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] Re: Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 ** Attachment added: "alsa-info_2.6.24-12.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12556324/alsa-info_2.6.24-12.txt -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200793] [NEW] Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200338 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source Sound does well with kernel 2.6.24-11-generic from release 8.04 alpha 6 but the new kernel 2.6.24-12-generic has an issue with the Azalia-chip, though lspci shows it recognised. But have a look at dmesg. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Audio: Azalia-chip not correctly recognised under 2.6.24-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200793 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91235] Re: Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810
Logfile of Xorg and lspci above of course was done with -vvnn ** Attachment added: "logfile_Xorg.0.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6729189/Xorg.0.log -- Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810 https://launchpad.net/bugs/91235 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91235] Re: Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810
** Attachment added: "done with lspci -vvvn" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6729163/lspci.txt -- Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810 https://launchpad.net/bugs/91235 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91235] Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg My System is an Intel DG965OT with Core2Duo running new installed Feisty herd5 which is up-to-date via aptitude using 2.6.20-9-generic When I tried to run tvtime it complained about missing features of the graphic card, so in the end I checked /etc/X11/xorg.conf and changed Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "vesa" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection to Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "i810" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection and rebooted the system. Needless to say tvtime is doing fine now. As graphic drivers of Intel are (more or less) free I thought they would be automatically activated? greetings feneks (Sorry, as my mother tongue is German the identifier is in German as well which means default graphic card). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 10 22:05:36 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux gnomedia 2.6.20-9-generic #2 SMP Mon Feb 26 03:01:44 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg My System is an Intel DG965OT with Core2Duo running new installed Feisty herd5 which is up-to-date via aptitude using 2.6.20-9-generic When I tried to run tvtime it complained about missing features of the graphic card, so in the end I checked /etc/X11/xorg.conf and changed Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "vesa" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection to Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "i810" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection - and rebooted the system. Needless to say tvtime is doing fine now. This - might be the reason for Bug:86341 . I haven't ever played with beryl or - compiz so I won't check in near future. + and rebooted the system. Needless to say tvtime is doing fine now. greetings feneks (Sorry, as my mother tongue is German the identifier is in German as well which means default graphic card). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 10 22:05:36 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux gnomedia 2.6.20-9-generic #2 SMP Mon Feb 26 03:01:44 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg My System is an Intel DG965OT with Core2Duo running new installed Feisty herd5 which is up-to-date via aptitude using 2.6.20-9-generic When I tried to run tvtime it complained about missing features of the graphic card, so in the end I checked /etc/X11/xorg.conf and changed Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "vesa" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection to Section "Device" Identifier "Standardgrafikkarte" Driver "i810" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection - and rebooted the system. Needless to say tvtime is doing fine now. + and rebooted the system. Needless to say tvtime is doing fine now. As + graphic drivers of Intel are (more or less) free I thought they would be + automatically activated? greetings feneks (Sorry, as my mother tongue is German the identifier is in German as well which means default graphic card). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 10 22:05:36 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux gnomedia 2.6.20-9-generic #2 SMP Mon Feb 26 03:01:44 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux -- Feisty Herd 5 sets Intel GMA X3000 to VESA-mode instead of i810 https://launchpad.net/bugs/91235 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86573] flumotion-worker instantly crashed
It seems to be the same problem. Starting /usr/bin/flumotion-worker -v echoes: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/cred/pamauth.py:11: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module PAM: This Python has API version 1013, module PAM has version 1012. import PAM Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/flumotion-worker", line 45, in boot.boot(PROGRAM_PATH) File "/usr/lib/flumotion/python/flumotion/common/boot.py", line 142, in boot main = reflect.namedAny(path) File "/usr/lib/flumotion/python/flumotion/twisted/reflect.py", line 49, in namedAny topLevelPackage = __import__(trialname) File "/usr/lib/flumotion/python/flumotion/worker/main.py", line 33, in from flumotion.worker import worker, config File "/usr/lib/flumotion/python/flumotion/worker/worker.py", line 40, in from flumotion.common import errors, interfaces, log, bundleclient File "/usr/lib/flumotion/python/flumotion/common/interfaces.py", line 30, in class IMedium(components.Interface): AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Interface' Same package as above is used, kernel is 2.6.20-9-generic. There exists a newer stable Version of flumotion as mentioned in Bug #82466. -- [apport] flumotion-manager crashed with AttributeError in ()Doesnt start at boot https://launchpad.net/bugs/86573 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
