[Bug 1861558] Re: Snap 'ed applicaitons have garbage on top of the window Close [x] button

2020-12-09 Thread Martin Hamel
@Francois Thirioux, I have the problem under X11.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861558

Title:
  Snap 'ed applicaitons have garbage on top of the window Close [x]
  button

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adwaita-icon-theme/+bug/1861558/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1376154] Re: data grid not displaying resultset is blank

2015-12-22 Thread Martin Hamel
I had to recompile the application. The packagers don't seem to care that
it works or not.
Le 22 déc. 2015 15:20, "Gocht Guerrero"  a écrit :

> Hi ~Maximiliano García,
>
> Have you found any fix for this? I am just having this issue in freya,
> just like you.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1365383).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376154
>
> Title:
>   data grid not displaying resultset is blank
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-workbench/+bug/1376154/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376154

Title:
  data grid not displaying resultset is blank

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-workbench/+bug/1376154/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1248238] [NEW] Suspend warning dialog does not disappear when waking up

2013-11-05 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu 13.10, there is a dialog showing up before the the computer
goes to sleep warning that the computer will soon go to sleep. When the
computer wakes up, that warning is still there. I would expect the
warning to disappear when the computer wakes up.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Capture du 2013-11-05 11:03:56.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248238/+attachment/3900692/+files/Capture%20du%202013-11-05%2011%3A03%3A56.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248238

Title:
  Suspend warning dialog does not disappear when waking up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/1248238/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 405654] Re: I see myself as a buddy (jabber/gtalk)

2009-09-22 Thread Martin Hamel
Same here in Karmic.

Responding to Guillaume: I don't know if I'm in my own list. I'm not in
my list with the other clients. And I can't remove myself from the list.
So I really think it's not normal.

-- 
I see myself as a buddy (jabber/gtalk)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-09-21 Thread Martin Hamel
I want to add that I also have this bug. Card is: nVidia Corporation
G72M [Quadro NVS 110M/GeForce Go 7300] (rev a1). Computer is a Dell
latitude D620.

Karmic working ok if compiz is not enabled.

-- 
Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 216272] Re: internal error failed to initialize HAL

2008-05-11 Thread Martin Hamel
Removing the automatic connection did solve the problem for me. So I
confirm that it is a race condition here.

-- 
internal error failed to initialize HAL
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216272
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 216272] Re: internal error failed to initialize HAL

2008-05-11 Thread Martin Hamel
I have the same problem when I boot my computer. "Internal Error -
Failed to initialize HAL!" when I login. Then I have all sorts of wrong
behaviors like automounting not working.

If I then logout and log back in, everything is fine. It looks like a
race condition described here:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/149881.

But I checked everything there and I my rc2 starting order are ok. In
/etc/init.d/rc, CONCURRENCY is also set to none.

I have to say also that my connection preferences are set to
"automatic". I'll try setting it back to manual. If it's a race issue,
that may solve the problem.

-- 
internal error failed to initialize HAL
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216272
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 105698] Re: kpowersave wrongly thinks AC adapter is plugged in

2007-04-12 Thread Martin Hamel
since my last feisty update, I have the same bug. When the power is
plugged, everything is ok. When I unplug it, it show the charging icon
and it always show that the battery is full. If I over my mouse over the
icon, the good information is shown in the contextual window. So it
seems to be only an icon problem.

-- 
kpowersave wrongly thinks AC adapter is plugged in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105698
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-03-08 Thread Martin Hamel
Just a mail to the desperate:  It works if you install the nvidia drivers
from the nvidia web site.

Good luck

2007/3/8, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just updated everything again (including libxcb) + reboot.
>
> Still get the same error on both of my systems.
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 64841] Re: wireless assistant does not connect in edgy

2007-03-02 Thread Martin Hamel
I just wanted to report that I installed the current nvidia driver manually
after I got it on there website. It solved the problem. Till I have another
kernel upgrade at least :-)

2007/3/2, Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> ** Tags removed: verification-needed
>
> --
> wireless assistant does not connect in edgy
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/64841
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
wireless assistant does not connect in edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64841

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-27 Thread Martin Hamel
Sorry if it seemed too negative. I did not want to complain. I just wanted
to comunicate. Anyway.. it was my fault this time. I did not test it well. I
thought I had the "nv" driver but it was not so. The problem is still
happening with the "nvidia" driver.

2007/2/27, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What application is causing the problem with the nv driver? Could you
> get a backtrace?
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-27 Thread Martin Hamel
I updated my xlibs this morning and the problem now exist with the "nv"
driver also. Things are just getting worst. :-(

2007/2/26, haaland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I've got the same bug, but I am using a radeon card, with the open
> radeon-driver. libgl1-mesa-glx is version 6.5.2-3ubuntu1.
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-26 Thread Martin Hamel
Reinstalling nvidia-glx does not cure the proble. But if I use the "nv"
driver instead of the "nvidia" driver, it works. Well then I don't have 3D
anymore. :-(

2007/2/26, Timo Aaltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Martin: try reinstalling nvidia-glx if that helps.
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-24 Thread Martin Hamel
libgl1-mesa-glx is at version 6.5.2-3ubuntu1

I have a nvidia card with the binary driver that is in the feisty
repository: nvidia-glx version 1.0.9631+2.6.20.2-8.7

2007/2/24, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Looks like a problem with mesa. What version of the libgl1-mesa-glx
> package is installed? What videocard do you have? Do you use any binary
> driver that could divert the mesa libgl?
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-24 Thread Martin Hamel
I'm up to date on feisty. I use Crossover with wine. But my Openoffice has
nothing special.

2007/2/23, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thank you for your bug. Could you get a backtrace
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash) of the crash? The
> problem is likely not to libx11, the new version of that package just
> trigger lock problem to other libraries. Is you distribution uptodate?
> wine, ooweb, oowriter works fine on my desktop
>
> ** Changed in: libx11 (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Medium
>Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 87390] Re: c->xlib.lock

2007-02-24 Thread Martin Hamel
here is the backtrace when starting openoffice:
(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1247488304 (LWP 6605)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[KCrash handler]
#6  0xb7f21410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#7  0xb6c60df0 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8  0xb6c62641 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#9  0xb6c5a43b in __assert_fail () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#10 0xb6821651 in xcb_xlib_unlock () from /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0
#11 0xb6fa7bd4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#12 0x080ba2d0 in ?? ()
#13 0xb6d75120 in ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#14 0x0138 in ?? ()
#15 0xb6fa7b8a in ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#16 0xb4846ef0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
#17 0x in ?? ()


2007/2/23, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thank you for your bug. Could you get a backtrace
> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash) of the crash? The
> problem is likely not to libx11, the new version of that package just
> trigger lock problem to other libraries. Is you distribution uptodate?
> wine, ooweb, oowriter works fine on my desktop
>
> ** Changed in: libx11 (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Medium
>Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
>
> --
> c->xlib.lock
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 87390] c->xlib.lock

2007-02-23 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

Hi,

When I upgraded this morning, I was left with many application not
working. All wine related application and openoffice. Probably some
others. They throw the following error message when starting:

soffice.bin: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock:  l'assertion « c->xlib.lock » a 
échoué.
KCrash: Application 'soffice.bin' crashing..

I have a french version of kubuntu, that is why there is some french in
the error message.

I looked around and found that it was related to the libx11-6 package. I
downgraded libx11-6 to the edgy version and the application resumed
working.

Some other problems did show up with the eady libx11-6. My keyboards
dead keys are not working now. So it is not a perfect solution. But it
is not surprising since I'm mixing versions now. I guess that I'm lucky
that is somehow works. :-)

** Affects: libx11 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
c->xlib.lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/87390

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-12-02 Thread Martin Hamel
But there is a broadcom free driver and they are working on the cards which
are interesting us. So there should be a solution pretty soon. Certainly at
the next kernel. It is not true that nothing is going to be done about it.

2006/12/2, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It's rejected because we can't fix bugs related to proprietary drivers.
> One being a windows NDIS driver, and the other being a proprietary
> nvidia driver.
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 73821] failed to enable network in wpa_supplicant

2006-11-29 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

Hi,

I'm on kubuntu 6.10 and I have to connect to a wpa network. I installed kwlan 
but never got it to work. Here is what I do:
* press "scan" to have a liste of networks. 
* choose the network I want
* I enter my password and click "add" and get the error message "failed to 
enable network in wpa_supplicant configuration" and the other error message 
"Failed to save the wpa_supplicant configuration. Is update_config=1 defined in 
wpa_supplicant.conf?"

I don't have a wpa_supplicant.conf file. The package seems like it is
only half installed.. or their is something I don't understand.

** Affects: kwlan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
failed to enable network in wpa_supplicant
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73821

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 48509] Re: Power Saving in Display

2006-11-14 Thread Martin Hamel
I confirm that bug on kubuntu 6.10. For me, the timeout before switching
out the monitor always reset itself to 5 hours. It work when I change
it. It is in memory but not on disk. It does not get saved.

-- 
Power Saving in Display
https://launchpad.net/bugs/48509

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 64686] Re: firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there

2006-10-20 Thread Martin Hamel
I finally installed firefox from the tarball and the problem is solved.

-- 
firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64686

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 64686] Re: firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there

2006-10-12 Thread Martin Hamel
the package for psm with that version of firefox is libnss3. It is
installed and all the files are there. I tried to re install it (firefox
also). But it changed nothing. I'm puzzled.

-- 
firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64686

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 65162] Re: Minutes shown has MM

2006-10-12 Thread Martin Hamel
I found that the problem is the date description string has the minutes
in uppercase. If I put them in lowercase, it works.

The default configuration for french is still wrong.

-- 
Minutes shown has MM
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65162

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 65162] Minutes shown has MM

2006-10-10 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

Since I upgraded to edgy, all kde applications stopped showing minutes
with the houre. If it is 9:15, the display will say "9:MM". All the
applications are showing the "MM" instead of the minutes.

I'm not sure if it is related to the french translation or not.

** Affects: kde-i18n-fr (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Minutes shown has MM
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65162

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-09 Thread Martin Hamel
Yes.. and I do not see any network with the kde wireless manager.

2006/10/9, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The 4311 should be somewhat supported by the driver in edgy. Have you
> tried it?
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-09 Thread Martin Hamel
See that web page for 4311 driver status:
http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/?go=devices

I guess that would be our best hope. Right now, the driver is listed has
unstable for the 4311. We could have something working soon. But not for
edgy. It will mean recompiling our kernel our wait for edgy+1.

2006/10/5, Martin Hamel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The BCM43XX does not support the 4311 yet. Actually, they are working on
> it and I eard that it was partially working now. But that version is not in
> the 2.6.17 kernel. And I don't know what "partially working mean". Well, I
> guess we'll have a working driver in edgyh+1. But that leave's us like that
> for another 6 months. :-(
>
> 2006/10/4, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Have you tried using the proper Linux driver? If you're having crashes
> > while
> >
> > a) running code that we don't have the source for (nvidia), and
> > b) running code that we don't have the source for and which is written
> > for a different OS (ndiswrapper/broadcom driver)
> >
> > it's sadly quite difficult for us to do anything.
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/Driver/bcm43xx/Dapper has
> > information on how to set it up.
> >
> > --
> > BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> > https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Hamel
> (418)261-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 64841] wireless assisant does not connect in edgy

2006-10-09 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

Since I upgraded to edgy, wireless assitant does not connect to any
ESSID. I choose a network and it says "connection failed". Then I go to
the command line and do "sudo ifup wlan0" and the connection comes up.

Note that I have to to through wireless assistant to choose a network
before I do "sudo ifup wlan0". If I don't, wlan0 is not associated with
a network and does not find a dhcp server.

** Affects: wlassistant (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
wireless assisant does not connect in edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64841

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 64686] Re: firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there

2006-10-08 Thread Martin Hamel
The PSM (Personal security manager) is the firefox module that contains SSL
connectivity for https connections. I think it was a separate package at a
time. You can see details here:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/psm/.

I don't know the exact relationship with firefox. I guess it should come
installed with it. There is probably a problem that makes firefox not find
the appropriate libraries. I don't know why.

2006/10/8, Sarah Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> the personal security manager is installed?
>
> What is that?
>
> --
> firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/64686
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64686

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 64686] firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there

2006-10-08 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

I upgraded to edgy last week.

When I try to access a https site with firefox beta 2, I get an error page. It 
says:
"Verify that the personal security manager in installed." My installation is in 
french, so I translated the error message. The wording may be a little 
different.

** Affects: kdebase (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
firefox beta on edgy personal security manager not there
https://launchpad.net/bugs/64686

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Hamel
The BCM43XX does not support the 4311 yet. Actually, they are working on it
and I eard that it was partially working now. But that version is not in the
2.6.17 kernel. And I don't know what "partially working mean". Well, I guess
we'll have a working driver in edgyh+1. But that leave's us like that for
another 6 months. :-(

2006/10/4, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Have you tried using the proper Linux driver? If you're having crashes
> while
>
> a) running code that we don't have the source for (nvidia), and
> b) running code that we don't have the source for and which is written for
> a different OS (ndiswrapper/broadcom driver)
>
> it's sadly quite difficult for us to do anything.
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/Driver/bcm43xx/Dapper has
> information on how to set it up.
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-04 Thread Martin Hamel
   CPU0   CPU1
  0:2147788  0IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:   8286  0IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  8:  3  0IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:  5  0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 12: 139668  0IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 14:  22116  0IO-APIC-edge  libata
 15:  59541  0IO-APIC-edge  libata
 50:   3889  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
 58:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb3
 66:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb4
177: 470543  0   IO-APIC-level  ndiswrapper
185:  7  0   IO-APIC-level  yenta
233:159  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb5
NMI:  0  0
LOC:21473822147381
ERR:  0
MIS:  0


2006/10/4, Kevin Kubasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ok, well best of luck with the new card, I'm gonna figure this out
> eventually ;)
>
> Could you provide me with the output of 'cat /proc/' ?
>
> Mine looks like this.
>
>CPU0   CPU1
>   0:7171886  0IO-APIC-edge  timer
>   1:  24263  0IO-APIC-edge  i8042
>   8:  3  0IO-APIC-edge  rtc
>   9:  4  0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
> 12:207  0IO-APIC-edge  i8042
> 14: 22  0IO-APIC-edge  libata
> 15: 200969  0IO-APIC-edge  libata
> 58:3290794  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb5
> 66: 368541  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb2, HDA Intel
> 74:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb3
> 82:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb4
> 90:   10761725  0 PCI-MSI  eth0
> 169:2008836  0   IO-APIC-level  nvidia
> 177:   5835  0   IO-APIC-level  eth1
> 193: 10  0   IO-APIC-level  ohci1394, yenta
> NMI:  0  0
> LOC:71716737171672
> ERR:  0
> MIS:  0
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-04 Thread Martin Hamel
ok ;-) I thought you where a kernel hacher or something. On my side, I think
more and more about buying a new wifi card.

good luck!

2006/10/4, Kevin Kubasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just a note, I mean this as a user, not someone who can fix it, I have
> been trying for about a month now with no success, but if someone with
> more experience with ndiswrapper/the linux kernel is willing to
> talk/work with me we can try to figure it out.
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-10-04 Thread Martin Hamel
Where do I meet you on IRC?

2006/10/4, Kevin Kubasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just a note, this is still an issue with the nvidia beta driver, dunno
> if anyone expected it to be fixed, but its still an issue there.
>
> Please let me know if theres any way I can help. I am more than willing
> to arrange a time to sit down on IRC or something and hammer this out
> the manual way with someone ;). Just get in touch with me through any
> one of the ways on my launchpad page.
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57355] Re: [Bug 57355] Re: BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-09-06 Thread Martin Hamel
Nothing yet. :-(

You should say in the bug that you reproduced it.

2006/9/6, chevrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have exactly the same problem.  Any solution!?
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>


-- 
Martin Hamel
(418)261-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57355] BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts

2006-08-22 Thread Martin Hamel
Public bug reported:

I use use ndiswrapper at the same time has the nvidia driver. Everything
work fine for something like 20 minutes. Then, the wifi card just stops
working.

Here are the related loggings:
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[common_interrupt+26/32] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[cpu_idle+111/192] cpu_idle+0x6f/0xc0
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000] Disabling IRQ 
#177
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[__do_IRQ+253/272] __do_IRQ+0xfd/0x110
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[do_IRQ+25/48] do_IRQ+0x19/0x30
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[handle_IRQ_event+61/112] handle_IRQ_event+0x3d/0x70
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000] handlers:
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000] irq 177: 
nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[note_interrupt+135/240] note_interrupt+0x87/0xf0
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[pg0+943832731/1069184000] acpi_processor_idle+0x184/0x32d [processor]
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000] 
[pg0+947062368/1069184000] (ndis_isr+0x0/0xe0 [ndiswrapper])
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[__report_bad_irq+42/160] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0xa0
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[start_kernel+410/512] start_kernel+0x19a/0x200
2006-07-08 10:59:54 localhost   kernel  [17180989.644000]  
[unknown_bootoption+0/496] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1f0

I tried to boot with the irqpool "option" without success. I also tried
many other ACPM option that changed nothing. I discovered that if I
reverted my xorg driver from the driver "nvidia" to "nv", the wifi card
now works ok. But I loose my 3D. Somebody on the ubuntuforums threads
said that using a 386 kernel instead of a 686 one was also working. But
then, my Intel Core Duo is no more a Duo.

i followed those instructions to have my BCM1390M wifi card working on my Dell 
D620 working: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=193350

I first upgraded to the last version of ndiswrapper and installed the
windows driver. Everything works fine but.. only for less then half an
hour.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

** Tags added: wireless

-- 
BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs