[Bug 1270445] Re: slow NFS4 without "NEED_GSSD=yes"
mouse seizing up and unable to scroll ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+question/258385 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270445 Title: slow NFS4 without "NEED_GSSD=yes" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1270445/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477278] Re: libg2c no longer installed with gfortran
Marked as a duplicate of the following bug: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-3.4/+question/85304 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 85304 Cut-off action menu icons in Opera 9.10 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 85304 Cut-off action menu icons in Opera 9.10 -- libg2c no longer installed with gfortran https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477278] Re: libg2c no longer installed with gfortran
gfortran and libgfortran3 are installed but they do not contain libg2c. I have code which has libg2c as a dependancy, which package contains this, if any? -- libg2c no longer installed with gfortran https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477278] Re: libg2c no longer installed with gfortran
Thanks for your reply. So am I right in thinking libg2c is depreciated and that I should use libf2c instead? -- libg2c no longer installed with gfortran https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477278] [NEW] libg2c no longer installed with gfortran
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-4.4 In 8.04 libg2c is installed with the gfortran package. This doesn't happen in 9.10 and I'm unable to find another package to install this library. ** Affects: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libg2c no longer installed with gfortran https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477278 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269904] Re: Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid
Unfortunately I am very much still experiencing these problems with the 173 drivers and all the latest updates. The problem is most visible in Lyx and gvim. -- Screen refresh problems with nvidia on intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268803] Re: Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup
** Changed in: kubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: network-manager-applet => kubuntu-default-settings -- Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268803] Re: Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup
I can reproduce this behaviour as well. ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268803] Re: Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup
I can confirm this as well. However, I got this behaviour by going in the reverse direction. ie., I started out with a Gnome ubuntu-desktop install, and later install kubuntu-desktop. This caused the programs listed in the report to show up in my Sessions applet. -- Ubuntu Intrepid: Both Knetworkmanager and Network Manager load on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280012] Re: [intrepid] opening facebook in firefox raises cpu usage
I can also confirm. Firefox exhibits this behaviour even with a brand new (firefox) profile and with the --safe-mode option. My info: -Intrepid (x86) -Firefox 3.0.3 -Steps to reproduce: -Open up Firefox, go to Facebook. Login to a facebook account. Xorg CPU usage will shoot up. -I can reproduce this even with a fresh .mozilla folder. NOTE: This behaviour is only reproduced when the user is logged in to a Facebook account. -- [intrepid] opening facebook in firefox raises cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280012] Re: [intrepid] opening facebook in firefox raises cpu usage
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [intrepid] opening facebook in firefox raises cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235934] [NEW] kwin-style-dekorator does not work by default
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kwin-style-dekorator The kwin-style-dekorator package does not make the necessary ~/.kde/share/apps/deKorator/themes/ directory. It is normally expected that the "Install New Theme" function to install a theme. Instead, it seems to install but then will not appear in the Theme list. This occurs in Ubuntu Hardy with kwin-style-dekorator version 0.3-1 Reproducing: Install kwin-style-dekorator. Download a DeKorator theme. Open up kcontrol, go to "Appearance & Themes > Window Decorations". Select DeKorator. Go to DeKorator's "Themes" tab. Click "Install New Theme", select the theme tar you just downloaded. Press OK. DeKorator appears to work for a second, but the theme does not appear in the list. Selecting "Apply" causes no window decorations (borderless windows). Workaround: For now, manually creating the ~/.kde/share/apps/deKorator/themes directory fixes this problem and allows the "Install New Theme" function to work. ** Affects: kwin-style-dekorator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kwin-style-dekorator does not work by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235934 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194979] Re: "Home Folder" keyboard shortcut does not work
I have the same problem with Hardy beta also. -- "Home Folder" keyboard shortcut does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
I also had a notebook hard drive just die. It was a Samsung in a Dell XPS M1330. I am not saying that because the hard drive died, and I have taken interest in this bug, that this bug is the reason. However I did have smartctl report high load cycle counts (although I know this is not alway accurate). I can also confirm that the hard drive was ONLY used under Ubuntu for the 4.5 month period it was alive (except for the 1 week with the preinstalled Vista). And it was never dropped etc. And it also made a loud click 2-3 times a minute that it would not make when using the preinstalled Vista before it was removed. So, while this is all just circumstantial evidence, take it or leave it as raw data. By the way, I would just like to mention one thing. I have been subscribed to this bug for months (in fact I was subscribed to other bugs that this duplicated to hush some of the troubleshooting going on in bug reports). One of the arguments we see is the balance between protecting the hard drive and reducing life from power cycling. Take in to account the two highest probability hard drive killers from this argument: 1. The user drops the computer but the head was not parked and the platters are damaged. 2. The user gradually starts experiencing filesystem issues from a hard drive reaching the end of it's life. Now, considering both options, which one is primarily caused by the OS? The second much more than the first. While the OS _MAY_ have helped with the first situation, it is not definite and many users are not aware that the OS will even attempt to park the head when not in use. In fact, most users don't even know what a hard drive head is, let alone a hard drive. I am aware that the second situation, which in my hypothetical is mostly caused by the OS, allows for the user to make backups before serious failure as opposed to the first situation. But in this hypothetical, let's say a person suddenly has a few files get corrupted, or perhaps even experiences some errors in day to day operation. Is this user going to get their external hard drive and run dd_rescue? Most likely not, I know my parents don't even know what dd is. My personal opinion, which I know does not amount to much in the scheme of things :), is that as a user-friendly distribution we should help pioneer ways to protect the less-technically-inclined user first and still leave all the options there for people who want to dig. And I think that for this bug, the primary way to do this is to stop parking the head so much by default. -- High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85468] Re: NetworkManager finds wireless network, does not connect
I am getting this behaviour with Gutsy and an IPW3945, is there a more appropriate (not ndiswrapper) bug to report this behaviour too? Also what information should I include. Thanks. -- NetworkManager finds wireless network, does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103223] Re: X incorrectly defaults to using disabled Intel onboard graphics card instead of nVidia FX5500 PCI card
While this is well reported I just wanted to note I experience the exact same behaviour in Gutsy using the Xubuntu live disk. Re-enabling the onboard and switching over seems to be the only solution. The installation halts and will not even allow switching over to another terminal so it is impossible to edit the xorg.conf. -- X incorrectly defaults to using disabled Intel onboard graphics card instead of nVidia FX5500 PCI card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
Andrew definitely has a good point. And a lot of other people have backed him. It's definitely true that we want the head to park as soon as possible after there is no activity. But for some reason Ubuntu is unparking the head, doing something for a split second, and reparking the head at a constant interval. I think it's this behaviour that really needs to be addressed, not power management. -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
I just want to chime in with all the others that are frustrated this is listed as "wishlist". I know a quick triager may have just skimmed and not noticed the importance. But, now that this is getting more attention from people affected, it's clear this is a critical priority issue. Please reevaluate the importance of this issue. -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92288] Re: [Gutsy] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM
** Summary changed: - [Gutsy RC] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM + [Gutsy] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM -- [Gutsy] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92288] Re: [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM
I can confirm this bug also. Worst of all, I'm using the Gutsy RC. I think one of the reasons this isn't reported very often is that its hard to tell its going on unless you're in a quiet room. For me, adding "sudo hdparm -B254 /dev/sda" to my rc.local made this excessive parking stop. Seriously, Ubuntu killing hard drives is not cool and will get bad press. ** Summary changed: - [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM + [Gutsy RC] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM -- [Gutsy RC] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122136] Re: Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved
Steps to reproduce: 1. Set a low resolution, most likely with a height under 800 pixels. 2. Go to Edit -> Edit Preferences (Ctrl + P) in gtkpod. Expected Results: Be able to edit preferences and save chages. Actual results: Changes can be made but not saved because "Apply" "Cancel" and "OK" buttons are hidden outside of the viewable area. ** Description changed: This happens using default Ubuntu 7.04 desktop environment (gnome). I used gtkpod at Debian Lenny. The preferences window is very big, but holding ALT and dragging it would solve the problem. However, on Ubuntu, the window can only be moved horizontally. There is no way to reach the buttons on the bottom of the window. I believe this is a bug in Metacity, not in gtkpod. This leads the program useless. My lucky, is that I could copy my old ~/.gtkpod/ from my old system. Thank you. + + + Added to complete bug report, thank you for submitting the bug: + + Steps to reproduce: + 1. Set a low resolution, most likely with a height under 800 pixels. + 2. Go to Edit -> Edit Preferences (Ctrl + P) in gtkpod. + + Expected Results: + Be able to edit preferences and save chages. + + Actual results: + Changes can be made but not saved because "Apply" "Cancel" and "OK" buttons are hidden outside of the viewable area. -- Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122136] Re: Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved
** Changed in: gtkpod (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122136] Re: Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved
I can confirm this also, it's very annoying because I can't actually make any changes to my preferences. Resolution is 1280x800 -- Preferences window can't fit on screen and can't be moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48077] Re: Running nvidia-glx-config enable breaks X.
On an HP DV6000t with a Geforce Go 7400 this kills the X config as well. I fixed the dead X config by reverting back to the old generic config that nvidia-glx-config saves. Then, instead of running "nvidia-glx- config enable" I ran "nvidia-xconfig" which worked like a charm, preserved my X config, and enabled full hardware acceleration. I propose that Synaptic and Add/Remove suggestion running "nvidia- xconfig" instead of "nvidia-glx-config enable". -- Running nvidia-glx-config enable breaks X. https://launchpad.net/bugs/48077 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
