[Bug 1425312] [NEW] keystrokes like CTRL-ALT-F1 are not passed thru to the remote system
Public bug reported: Linux special keystrokes such as: CTRL-ALT-F1 thru CTRL-ALT-F9 are not passed thru to the remote session, it switches the local computer's console :( It makes it hard to manage JAVA remote consoles on hardware that is running linux ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: remmina 1.0.0-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-43.72-generic 3.13.11.11 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-43-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.7 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Feb 24 14:53:52 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-01-07 (48 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) SourcePackage: remmina UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: remmina (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425312 Title: keystrokes like CTRL-ALT-F1 are not passed thru to the remote system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/1425312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1409959] Re: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub
The machine is On BIOS A03 on Dell Optiplex 3020, UEFI boot (not secure boot) I just Upgraded to BIOS A05, no change in problem Grub starts, if I dont touch the keyboard and the new kernel boots by default, I sometimes see this error: loading linux 3.19.0-03a902.rc4 loading initial ramdisk... ignoring BGRT: invalid status 0 (expected 1) gave up waiting for root-dev Alert /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-root does not exist, dropping to shell Busybox (initramfs) If I boot Recovery of the same kernel, I get a bunch of devices listed, then it locks up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409959 Title: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1409959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1409959] Re: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub
I just installed this kernel: linux-headers-3.19.0-031900rc4-generic_3.19.0-031900rc4.201501112135_amd64.deb linux-image-3.19.0-031900rc4-generic_3.19.0-031900rc4.201501112135_amd64.deb as a test, as requested, but it also would not boot Just added this tag: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409959 Title: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1409959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1409959] Re: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409959 Title: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1409959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1409959] [NEW] after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub
Public bug reported: I upgaded to -44 from -43 and my UEFI system (Dell Optiplex 3020) wont boot - i see grub, it starts, then collapses back to the initramfs prompt I downgraded to -43 and it works again ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-44-generic (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-43.72-generic 3.13.11.11 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-43-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.6 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC2: mbw2829 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC0: mbw2829 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/controlC1: mbw2829 F pulseaudio CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Jan 12 15:51:45 2015 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ad3d0446-a2b9-4af5-8e88-3cdf6e9fd23d InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-01-07 (5 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140722.2) IwConfig: eth0 no wireless extensions. lono wireless extensions. MachineType: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 3020 ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.13.0-43-generic.efi.signed root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-root ro quiet splash PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Daemon not responding. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-43-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-43-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.127.11 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 04/14/2014 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A03 dmi.board.name: 04YP6J dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A01 dmi.chassis.type: 15 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd04/14/2014:svnDellInc.:pnOptiPlex3020:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn04YP6J:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct15:cvr: dmi.product.name: OptiPlex 3020 dmi.product.version: 01 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty ** Summary changed: - after upgrade, UEFI system will not boot + after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409959 Title: after upgrade from 3.13.0-43 to -44, UEFI system will not boot past grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1409959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568704] Re: debian-installer preseed d-i mirror/http/proxy sets env http_proxy
I am also seeing this error on Debian Squeeze (debian 6) on i386 when I use Debian Installer. If the Debian / Ubuntu folks want to save a lot of traffic on their public mirrors, it makes sense to fix this bug. I am about to run hundreds of nodes worth of installs with about 600 packages - if you'd like me to hit your ftp.us.debian.org an order of magnitude less, give me a way to do so with preseed!!! thanks, Matt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568704 Title: debian-installer preseed d-i mirror/http/proxy sets env http_proxy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/568704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767349] [NEW] tcsh segfaults in libc-2.11.1.so
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tcsh [77839.133546] tcsh[3314]: segfault at 0 ip b772fbb3 sp bfa8e224 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76bc000+153000] [77844.092350] __ratelimit: 857 callbacks suppressed [77844.092355] tcsh[5029]: segfault at 0 ip b75afbb3 sp bfd3cef4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b753c000+153000] [77844.097983] tcsh[5031]: segfault at 0 ip b75a9bb3 sp bf91cbe4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7536000+153000] [77844.104996] tcsh[5033]: segfault at 0 ip b7680bb3 sp bfc788a4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b760d000+153000] [77844.111321] tcsh[5035]: segfault at 0 ip b75a3bb3 sp bfe908f4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b753+153000] [77844.116885] tcsh[5037]: segfault at 0 ip b76f7bb3 sp bf840454 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7684000+153000] [77844.122870] tcsh[5039]: segfault at 0 ip b7602bb3 sp bfe825f4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b758f000+153000] [77844.128420] tcsh[5041]: segfault at 0 ip b772bbb3 sp bfb40fe4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76b8000+153000] [77844.133983] tcsh[5043]: segfault at 0 ip b763dbb3 sp bfd92534 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75ca000+153000] [77844.139985] tcsh[5045]: segfault at 0 ip b7667bb3 sp bf990b54 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75f4000+153000] [77844.145760] tcsh[5047]: segfault at 0 ip b76b8bb3 sp bfe07414 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7645000+153000] [77849.104811] __ratelimit: 851 callbacks suppressed [77849.104816] tcsh[6741]: segfault at 0 ip b76a2bb3 sp bfb6aed4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b762f000+153000] [77849.110402] tcsh[6743]: segfault at 0 ip b7594bb3 sp bfcf9754 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7521000+153000] [77849.116337] tcsh[6745]: segfault at 0 ip b771fbb3 sp bf9b2224 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76ac000+153000] [77849.121835] tcsh[6747]: segfault at 0 ip b7655bb3 sp bfe1f3b4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75e2000+153000] [77849.127377] tcsh[6749]: segfault at 0 ip b7752bb3 sp bfb81004 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76df000+153000] [77849.133306] tcsh[6751]: segfault at 0 ip b7776bb3 sp bfaeb0f4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7703000+153000] [77849.138814] tcsh[6753]: segfault at 0 ip b773bbb3 sp bfeb6b94 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76c8000+153000] [77849.144331] tcsh[6755]: segfault at 0 ip b76e2bb3 sp bff3aae4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b766f000+153000] [77849.150232] tcsh[6757]: segfault at 0 ip b7749bb3 sp bf9ded54 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76d6000+153000] [77849.155706] tcsh[6759]: segfault at 0 ip b7732bb3 sp bf9262a4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76bf000+153000] [77854.116277] __ratelimit: 849 callbacks suppressed [77854.116282] tcsh[8449]: segfault at 0 ip b7626bb3 sp bfe76164 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75b3000+153000] [77854.121818] tcsh[8451]: segfault at 0 ip b774fbb3 sp bf909d24 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76dc000+153000] [77854.127696] tcsh[8453]: segfault at 0 ip b76d6bb3 sp bff9f614 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7663000+153000] [77854.133194] tcsh[8455]: segfault at 0 ip b759cbb3 sp bfc75c54 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7529000+153000] [77854.138755] tcsh[8457]: segfault at 0 ip b7646bb3 sp bfeaab64 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75d3000+153000] [77854.144634] tcsh[8459]: segfault at 0 ip b7711bb3 sp bf8cf964 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b769e000+153000] [77854.150266] tcsh[8461]: segfault at 0 ip b7722bb3 sp bff883e4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76af000+153000] [77854.155842] tcsh[8463]: segfault at 0 ip b76e7bb3 sp bfc1bd04 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7674000+153000] [77854.162647] tcsh[8465]: segfault at 0 ip b7671bb3 sp bf8e5844 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75fe000+153000] [77854.170217] tcsh[8467]: segfault at 0 ip b762bbb3 sp bf80bf24 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75b8000+153000] [77859.128310] __ratelimit: 865 callbacks suppressed [77859.128315] tcsh[10186]: segfault at 0 ip b7756bb3 sp bfa62544 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76e3000+153000] [77859.133955] tcsh[10188]: segfault at 0 ip b7651bb3 sp bfedfa14 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75de000+153000] [77859.139832] tcsh[10190]: segfault at 0 ip b75ccbb3 sp bfc31e74 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7559000+153000] [77859.145401] tcsh[10192]: segfault at 0 ip b7764bb3 sp bfc971a4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76f1000+153000] [77859.150962] tcsh[10194]: segfault at 0 ip b75b6bb3 sp bf8b1864 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7543000+153000] [77859.156843] tcsh[10196]: segfault at 0 ip b761dbb3 sp bfb41194 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b75aa000+153000] [77859.162339] tcsh[10198]: segfault at 0 ip b7741bb3 sp bfdee774 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b76ce000+153000] [77859.167841] tcsh[10200]: segfault at 0 ip b7683bb3 sp bfba6714 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b761+153000] [77859.173829] tcsh[10202]: segfault at 0 ip b75bebb3 sp bfe99904 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b754b000+153000] [77859.179364] tcsh[10204]: segfault at 0 ip b757ebb3 sp bffefe44 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b750b000+153000] [77864.139578] __ratelimit: 867 callbacks suppressed [77864.139582] tcsh[11935]: segfault at 0 ip b76c8bb3 sp bfd24aa4 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7655000+153000] [77864.145343] tcsh[11937]: segfault at 0 ip b765dbb3 sp bfac2304 error 4 in
[Bug 767349] Re: tcsh segfaults in libc-2.11.1.so
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767349 Title: tcsh segfaults in libc-2.11.1.so -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767349] Re: tcsh segfaults in libc-2.11.1.so
This might be a slippery one... suspect the bug may not actually be in tcsh but in some other package... will be interesting to see how this one is routed. :) Ubuntu devs: Thanks for your efforts! -M@ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767349 Title: tcsh segfaults in libc-2.11.1.so -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
Folks, versions prior to 8046 have a security flaw - Get something newer, if you can find it see the advisory below: Likewise Software has posted a security advisor on our Likewise Open forum announcements http://cts.vresp.com/c/?LikewiseSoftware/a4f78d058f/1b43a64120/5eac187271. This notice is to inform you of a critical update to specific Likewise Open packages that we have made available on our product download site. Below is a copy of the security advisory message. _ Likewise Security Advisory LWSA-2010-001 http://cts.vresp.com/c/?LikewiseSoftware/a4f78d058f/1b43a64120/6600c07eb4 _ Package : Likewise Open Service : Likewise Security Authority (lsassd) Date: 26-July-2010 Platform(s) : Linux, OS X, Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, FreeBSD Versions: Likewise Open 5.4 (prior to build 8046) Likewise-CIFS 5.4 (prior to build 8046) Likewise Open 6.0 (prior to build 8234) CVE(s) : CVE-2010-0833 _ Summary: A logic flaw has been found in the pam_lsass library that, when run under the context of a root service (e.g. sshd, gdm, etc.), will allow any user to logon as a lsassd local-provider account (e.g. MACHINE\Administrator) if the account's password is marked as expired. The cause is that the pam_lsass library uses SetPassword logic when detecting that the uid is 0 therefore not requiring that the intruder validate against the expired password before being allowed to specify a new password. All Likewise Open users are encouraged to upgrade to the latest released packages for their version or to to employ the stated workaround until such a time when an upgrade may be performed. This defect was first reported by Matt Weatherford from the University of Washington. Our thanks to Matt for helping improve Likewise Open. _ Workaround: Explicitly disabling the MACHINE\Administrator (or any other lsassd local-provider accounts not in use) will prevent unauthorized access. This may be done by running the following command as the local superuser. Replace with the hostname of the local system $ lw-mod-user --disable-user \Administrator You may verify that the account is disabled by running the lw-find-user-by-name command $ lw-find-user-by-name --level 2 MACHINE\Administrator ... Account disabled (or locked): TRUE _ Updated Packages: New packages for both Likewise Open 5.4 and Likewise Open 6.0 have been made available from http://cts.vresp.com/c/?LikewiseSoftware/a4f78d058f/1b43a64120/5976b460b8. http://www.likewise.com/download _ Likewise Security Team secur...@likewise.com http://cts.vresp.com/c/?LikewiseSoftware/a4f78d058f/1b43a64120/ea59d7255f _ __ This message was sent by Likewise Software using VerticalResponse Likewise Software 15395 SE 30th Pl Suite 140 Bellevue, Washington 98007 On 8/3/2010 11:44 AM, Tony Shadwick wrote: Going to give this a shot: http://www.likewise.com/bits/summer09/8040/LikewiseIdentityServiceOpen-5.4.0.8040-linux-x86_64 -deb-installer I'll report how it goes - this is the most recent build available after 7985. One would hope the problem did not spring back up in the later build... -- AssumeDefaultDomain does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-0833 -- AssumeDefaultDomain does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557761] Re: gwibber-accounts crashed with RuntimeError in run_couchdb()
10.04 beta 2 has this issue - all I did was click the letter icon in the upper Right side of toolbar, and chose set up broadcast account - tried this because I have no idea what a broadcast account is and wanted to see what would happen. A crash happened. :( -- gwibber-accounts crashed with RuntimeError in run_couchdb() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
I believe I have seen this bug also in 10.04 beta 2 -- AssumeDefaultDomain does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506199] [NEW] package sun-java6-jre (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: did not even see the screen to confirm/accept/deny license for this. on ubuntu netbook remix 9.10 karmic blasted past the screen and said I denied the license, then crashed Good luck fixing this! Matt ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jan 11 16:24:24 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook-Remix 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.4) NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: sun-java6-jre (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic SourcePackage: sun-java6 Tags: ubuntu-unr Title: package sun-java6-jre (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic i686 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 ubuntu-unr -- package sun-java6-jre (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506199] Re: package sun-java6-jre (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37750157/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37750158/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37750159/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package sun-java6-jre (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 50430] Re: NIS has problems starting before the network comes up
I will second the recommendation to remove network-manager...I also have had success in earlier revs of ubuntu in re-ordering the startup scripts so that NIS starts before autofs... dont remember if I had to do that in Karmic or not. This problem has been around a while now on various ubuntu and other linux distros. Network manager gets in the way in a fixed-ip corporate environment. On the other hand, NIS is a real pain if you are getting and releasing IP addresses frequently on a wireless LAN, which I believe is now a more frequent user scenario than a corporate scenario... Matt On 1/4/10 7:28 AM, fil wrote: Johan, unless you use NIS on an laptop I recommend to deinstall network-manager and use the old style /etc/interfaces configuration. At least this works for me. Don't have the respective machine at hand right now, so I'm not 100% sure if it is karmic already but I positively think so. g., fil - Johan Wallesjohan.wal...@gmail.com schrieb: Has anybody managed to work around this on Karmic? I just upgraded to Karmic, and my previous workaround is no good any more, and I now have to (re)start NIS manually at each boot :-(. Also, the top of the bug page says This bug affects you and one other person. Considering the amount of people subscribed to this that doesn't sound reasonable, please mark the top of the bug page if you're affected! -- NIS has problems starting before the network comes up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50430 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “autofs” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu: New Status in “nis” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Binary package hint: nis in /etc/rcX.d there are the symlinks, but I can not log in with a nis User. If I manually start /etc/init.d/nis from console with a local Account, after that I can log in with an NIS-account on Console and GDM. This Bug appears after Update to Kernel -25. May be NIS starts to early, before the Network is running. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/50430/+subscribe -- NIS has problems starting before the network comes up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 498027] Re: USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?)
Ludovic, This device and configuration has been working perfectly for months - then broke with the linux kernel upgrade of a week or so ago. the kernel after that was a little better, but still broken. Im going to persist with this bug - as this is supposed to be a 'Long Term Support Ubuntu Release - This is not a power user's system we've taken great pains not to muck around with the box. Im not keen on reinstalling. I will try to reassign to the kernel group, not sure I have launchpad permissions to do so. Thanks for the note :) Matt On 12/17/09 11:33 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: Maybe a kernel bug. Or maybe a hardware/software problem in your PDA device. Jpilot has nothing to do with kernel errors. This bug should be reassigned to the kernel. You should try to reinstall Hardy Heron 8.04 on x86 32 bit on another computer using the original CD (so with the original kernel) and see if you also have the pronblem. Maybe you can just reinstall the original 8.04 kernel. Another option is to upgrade to a more recent Ubuntu version and a newer kernel. -- USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498027] [NEW] USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: jpilot Hardy Heron 9.04 on x86 32 bit Problem started 2 kernels ago Sometimes cant get USB to work properly - its intermittent but highly annoying :) [ 449.812401] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 44, error -32 [ 454.708356] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 45 [ 454.797716] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 454.971953] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 455.163659] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 46 [ 455.251525] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 455.443102] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 455.634808] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 47 [ 456.043125] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 47, error -32 [ 456.130049] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 48 [ 456.538349] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 48, error -32 [ 461.545618] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 49 [ 461.633481] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 461.825187] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 462.000916] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 50 [ 462.088781] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 462.264511] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 462.456217] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 51 [ 462.863426] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 51, error -32 [ 462.935360] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 52 [ 463.348163] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 52, error -32 [ 468.191170] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 53 [ 468.279035] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 468.470738] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 468.646470] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 54 [ 468.734333] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 468.926039] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 469.101770] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 55 [ 469.508998] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 55, error -32 [ 469.581037] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 56 [ 469.988745] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 56, error -32 [ 474.932578] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 57 [ 475.020438] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 475.212144] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 475.387876] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 58 [ 475.475741] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 475.667448] usb 2-4.1.4: device descriptor read/64, error -32 [ 475.859151] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 59 [ 476.267894] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 59, error -32 [ 476.354392] usb 2-4.1.4: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 60 [ 476.762619] usb 2-4.1.4: device not accepting address 60, error -32 [ 586.976056] usb 2-4: USB disconnect, address 3 [ 586.976060] usb 2-4.1: USB disconnect, address 5 [ 586.976062] usb 2-4.1.1: USB disconnect, address 6 ** Affects: jpilot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: kernel usb -- USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 498027] [NEW] USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?)
Correction: Hardy Heron 8.04 on x86 32 bit MattW (seattle) wrote: Hardy Heron 9.04 on x86 32 bit -- USB bug prevents Jpilot from syncing (may be kernel bug?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496384] [NEW] package mwavem (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mwavem mwavem crashed on install on my Thinkpad T40. I know this machine doesnt have the latest firmware updates, but it appears to have at least a modem card installed (I see the rj11 jack on the left side) I didnt even try dialing - it just crashed during package install. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Dec 13 18:11:08 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: mwavem (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: mwavem Title: package mwavem (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686 ** Affects: mwavem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package mwavem (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496384] Re: package mwavem (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757153/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757154/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757155/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package mwavem (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 450651] Re: TTY gets corrupted after latest updates in Karmic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 448977 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448977 Im on the prerelease testing upgrade path from 09-04- karmic and this got broken for me during an upgrade. I was just able to resolve this issue by going to ubuntu menu - system - administration - hardware drivers and selecting the newest Nvidia hardware driver for my vidcard. I also did the usual aptitude update; aptitude upgrade after I rebooted, it looks ok now. This doesnt solve the automatic update problem tho - is there any way to force the hardware driver to a newer version at aptitude update time, or is that a user- or manual- config-only option? New installs of Karmic, presumably, wont have this issue - ? Matt wolfshark wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 448977 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448977 The same happens to me, i hope they fix it soon, because there isn't much time left. -- TTY gets corrupted after latest updates in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450651 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 50430] Re: NIS has problems starting before the network comes up
Chuck, This seems to be working, but my box isnt a super clean test - its had upgrades from earlier revs and I cant remember if I moved the /etc/rc2.d startup script #'s around... can you tell if this is the stock order of init scripts? tes...@lucky:/etc/rc2.d$ ls -la total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 5 13:47 . drwxr-xr-x 149 root root 12288 Oct 13 11:21 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 677 Oct 2 06:57 README lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root19 Aug 12 14:22 S01policykit - ../init.d/policykit lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root14 Aug 12 14:22 S10apmd - ../init.d/apmd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root18 Aug 12 14:22 S10sysklogd - ../init.d/sysklogd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root15 Aug 12 14:22 S11klogd - ../init.d/klogd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root13 Aug 25 14:56 S16ssh - ../init.d/ssh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root13 Aug 12 14:42 S18nis - ../init.d/nis lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Aug 12 14:42 S19autofs - ../init.d/autofs lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root17 Sep 14 11:55 S20couchdb - ../init.d/couchdb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root28 Aug 27 12:34 S20dkms_autoinstaller - ../init.d/d if it is the same as a default karmic install, then I think the bug is fixed. if I have time, I could do a fresh karmic install and test - which ISO would you like me to use to test this? thanks for checking in... BTW: Karmic Xorg server has been really nutty lately... thats my current problem. Just logged a bug. :) Matt Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I was wondering if this is still a problem on karmic? Regards chuck ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- NIS has problems starting before the network comes up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 450607] [NEW] karmic: text console is garbled when switching to ctrl-alt-f1 - f6
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg ctlr-alt-f1 - f6 yeild a colorful garbage screen ctrl-f7 does still work to get me back to a good gdm X screen reported 10/13/2009 on Karmic prerelease ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Oct 13 11:18:05 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 MachineType: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 755 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=986be6f2-40bd-49bc-b4f5-de694c657b2d ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.45-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu5 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1ubuntu3 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090825.fc74e119-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic i686 XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1771): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1771): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1832): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1852): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed dmi.bios.date: 06/16/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A14 dmi.board.name: 0GM819 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 6 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA14:bd06/16/2009:svnDellInc.:pnOptiPlex755:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0GM819:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct6:cvr: dmi.product.name: OptiPlex 755 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. fglrx: Not loaded system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: i686kernel: 2.6.31-13-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- karmic: text console is garbled when switching to ctrl-alt-f1 - f6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450607] Re: karmic: text console is garbled when switching to ctrl-alt-f1 - f6
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605547/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605548/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605549/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605550/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605551/GdmLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605552/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605553/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605554/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3360/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605556/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605558/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605559/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605560/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605561/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605562/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605563/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605564/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605565/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605566/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33605567/xkbcomp.txt -- karmic: text console is garbled when switching to ctrl-alt-f1 - f6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 50430] Re: NIS has problems starting before the network comes up
Chuck, This seems to be working, but my box isnt a super clean test - its had upgrades from earlier revs and I cant remember if I moved the /etc/rc2.d startup script #'s around... can you tell if this is the stock order of init scripts? tes...@lucky:/etc/rc2.d$ ls -la total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 5 13:47 . drwxr-xr-x 149 root root 12288 Oct 13 11:21 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 677 Oct 2 06:57 README lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root19 Aug 12 14:22 S01policykit - ../init.d/policykit lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root14 Aug 12 14:22 S10apmd - ../init.d/apmd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root18 Aug 12 14:22 S10sysklogd - ../init.d/sysklogd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root15 Aug 12 14:22 S11klogd - ../init.d/klogd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root13 Aug 25 14:56 S16ssh - ../init.d/ssh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root13 Aug 12 14:42 S18nis - ../init.d/nis lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 Aug 12 14:42 S19autofs - ../init.d/autofs lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root17 Sep 14 11:55 S20couchdb - ../init.d/couchdb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root28 Aug 27 12:34 S20dkms_autoinstaller - ../init.d/d if it is the same as a default karmic install, then I think the bug is fixed. if I have time, I could do a fresh karmic install and test - which ISO would you like me to use to test this? thanks for checking in... BTW: Karmic Xorg server has been really nutty lately... thats my current problem. Just logged a bug. :) Matt Chuck Short wrote: Hi, I was wondering if this is still a problem on karmic? Regards chuck ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- NIS has problems starting before the network comes up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173843] Re: static network settings not applied
Saw this behavior in the released Hardy Heron on i386 hardware on monday. Solution after setting static ip info was to manually run: /etc/init.d/networking restart as root. Verified new address with: ifconfig -a Annoying, but will only need to do it once ever until reinstall Matt -- static network settings not applied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
