[Bug 1968405] Re: yaru-theme-gnome-shell fails to install ["/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-new": No such file or directory]

2022-04-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I can confirm this bug, and it is not a space issue.
The problem is that is a symbolic link that messes with dpkg unpacking:
ls -lha /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Feb  6  2020 /usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell -> 
../../gnome-shell/theme/Yaru

This currently prevents updates to Jammy (unless you delete the symlink
first).

** Also affects: yaru-theme (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968405

Title:
  yaru-theme-gnome-shell fails to install
  ["/usr/share/themes/Yaru/gnome-shell/calendar-today-light.svg.dpkg-
  new": No such file or directory]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/1968405/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953428] Re: /etc/PackageKit/Vendor.conf specifies invalid CodecUrl

2022-03-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What should be the replacement link? On Debian, we use
https://wiki.debian.org/PackageKit/ItemNotFound#Missing_Codec

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953428

Title:
  /etc/PackageKit/Vendor.conf specifies invalid CodecUrl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1953428/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+attachment/5566548/+files/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963904

Title:
  
/usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like PK needs an updated `fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch` 
patch (attached). I queued it for Debian, but I am secretly waiting whether we 
will get another PK bugfix release in time (there's a few things left that I 
need to have a look at).
In any case, I believe the attached patch should fix this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963904

Title:
  
/usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
For completeness, a much better and simpler patch is this: 
https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/packagekit/-/blob/0c43611b82879bd71e633af02878d9c80283f7da/debian/patches/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch
Maybe that will make its way into Ubuntu Jammy too, but it's not as urgent :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837

Title:
  PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/packagekit/+bug/1961837/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Debian package is available: 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305719/accepted-packagekit-125-2-source-into-unstable/
I forgot to mark this issue as being explicitly closed in the changelog, but I 
guess Julian can do that when merging the changes into Ubuntu :-)

** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837

Title:
  PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/packagekit/+bug/1961837/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: packagekit via
   https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/issues/534
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837

Title:
  PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/packagekit/+bug/1961837/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)

** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Critical
 Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
   Status: New

** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837

Title:
  PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1961837/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Sounded like a daemon crash at first, but the deeper I dig the more
nonsensical it gets at the moment...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837

Title:
  PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1961837/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> packagekit will attempt to upgrade itself while running. This causes a
packagekit crash

That should not happen - do you have a backtrace for that? Reporting it
at the PackageKit bugtracker would also be nice so I have it on my
radar.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278

Title:
  Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels
  cleanup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1914278/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Makes sense to me :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278

Title:
  Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels
  cleanup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1914278/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I tested this with a bunch of dummy packages and a local repository, and 
everything worked pretty well and states were applied as expected. Of course, 
doesn't mean that there may be a real-world bug that I haven't seen yet, but I 
think it's unlikely (I've also been running this on my machine on Debian for 
the past weeks).
Even automatic kernel removals work, but I could not test yet whether they also 
work through PackageKit.
Is Focal using PackageKit for updates even? I thought it was still on 
update-manager/aptd for that task...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278

Title:
  Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels
  cleanup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1914278/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Resolving this required a fair bit of refactoring, so TBH I am not sure
that it is safe to backport to Focal, unless version 1.2.5 is submitted
as-a-whole.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278

Title:
  Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels
  cleanup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1914278/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958721] Re: appstreamcli refresh-cache reports MDB_MAP_FULL

2022-01-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You have a cache bigger than 256MB?? This issue is already fixed with
appstream 0.15.0, but I still would like to know why your cache is so
huge. What's you system locale?

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: appstream (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Medium
   Status: Fix Released

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu Jammy)
Milestone: ubuntu-22.04 => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958721

Title:
  appstreamcli refresh-cache reports MDB_MAP_FULL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1958721/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927149] Re: Irrelevant translatable strings

2021-09-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I still think this is a dumb fix, especially since you loose the feature to 
actually mark strings from being untranslatable by dropping the appstream 
dependency.
A proper workaround would be to leave that in, possibly backport the ITS patch 
for appstream to update the file, and then mark the release entries you don't 
want to have translated with `translate="no"` in the XML.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927149

Title:
  Irrelevant translatable strings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1927149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926104] Re: Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
How does the `project_license` tag in Wesnoths AppStream MetaInfo file
look like? Because that's the thing that is looked at to determine
whether the license is free.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926104

Title:
  Ubuntu software center lists Wesnoth as proprietary

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1926104/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782304] Re: package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2021-01-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not a problem in "appstream", it's usually a package manager issue, 
e.g. if there was a power outage during upgrades or install/remove steps. In 
this case, it just randomly hit the appstream package.
If the APT installation is fixed, this problem should go away. Please file an 
issue against APT in case this is a persistent problem!

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782304

Title:
  package libappstream3:amd64 0.9.4-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it
  before attempting configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1782304/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-12-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Not really fixed, AppStream has an incomplete workaround for the
gobject-introspection bug (which may break at any time for new functions
in either Python or Vala, if we aren't super careful).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903574

Title:
  isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gobject-introspection/+bug/1903574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1903574] Re: isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2020-11-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The bug is actually this one, in gobject-introspection:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305


** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues #305
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/305

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903574

Title:
  isenkram-lookup crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1903574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1879291] Re: rdmd is missing in package ldc

2020-10-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Simple: rdmd is not part of either gdc or ldc and is its own separate
tool, which has not been packaged.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879291

Title:
  rdmd is missing in package ldc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ldc/+bug/1879291/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881894] Re: Apps from PPAs with AppStream metadata are not displayed

2020-06-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is kind of to be expected, PPAs - unlike the main Ubuntu
repositories - do not support AppStream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881894

Title:
  Apps from PPAs with AppStream metadata are not displayed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-store/+bug/1881894/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue
completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad)

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and 
gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well.
Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On a fresh Ubuntu installation, apt-config-icons isn't installed by
default (at least it wasn't when I installed a fresh Ubuntu yesterday,
until I replaced the snap-store with the packaged gnome-software). So
new users who aren't upgrading from a previous Ubuntu version will still
have much less icons than people who get Focal by upgrading from an
older Ubuntu release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@nicocarbone: You'll also want to do something that `apt-config-icons`
is installed alongside `appstream` in Ubuntu desktops that use the
gnome-software Snap.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On 1): The metainfo/appdata file is only enough if it is complete, so,
contains an icon reference and name/summary/etc. tags. If it doesn't,
then you'll need the .desktop file as well and a launchable entry.

On 2): All of these locations are wrong ^^ Metainfo files *must* be installed 
into /usr/share/metainfo in order to be valid. Refer to the AppStream 
specification (specifically 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#spec-component-location)
 for details.
There's also an online tool to help people making metainfo files at 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/metainfocreator/#/ now

As for that existing "appdata" file, make sure it's actually an
AppStream metainfo file before installing it somewhere else - maybe it
just coincidentally has the same name as a metainfo file, but actually
is something different.

Also, google.chrome and network-manager need their metainfo locations
fixed ;-) It's likely that support for the legacy location will go away
soonish (almost nothing installs files there nowadays).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
>From looking at this again, I'm pretty sure that my patch from #1864307
will actually fix this issue too :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Actually, I just realized that Ubuntu has its very own, new flavor of this bug 
due to shipping gnome-software as a Snap. The `appstream` package is seeded 
with the minimal desktop seed, which is good, but in order for the Snap version 
of GS to install any icons, the `apt-config-icons` package also has to be 
installed - GS isn't smart enough to fall back to downloading icons in many 
cases and expects those to be present. The `gnome-software` package depends on 
the icon config, but the Snap store doesn't have this on new installations.
So, to fix this issue both the patch I linked in this report and a default 
dependency on `apt-config-icons` is needed.

The reason the `appstream` package doesn't depend on the icons on its
own is that the data may also be used on servers and more minimal
systems (e.g. for firmware and driver information) where downloading the
icons isn't required. Therefore, all software centers in Debian/Ubuntu
depend on the `apt-config-icons*` package(s) they need.

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2020-05-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@stuardo:
The reason for Guake being missing is that the `guake.desktop` file in 
`/usr/share/applications` is a symbolic link *and* the application doesn't ship 
a metainfo file.
This is forbidden: https://wiki.debian.org/AppStream/Guidelines
The .desktop file being a symlink results in Guake basically not being seen by 
the metadata generator at all. To fix this, either the .desktop file needs to 
be an actual file, and not a symlink, or a metainfo file[1] has to be shipped 
with this package. Ideally both.

The reason this package is missing is simply a result of nobody caring
enough to submit a patch or do a bit of work to make this app show up
for a few years now (it never was in the catalog, as far as I can tell).
Maybe a good case for a patch submission? ;-)

[1]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/metainfocreator/#/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875307] Re: Missing application icons Gnome-Software Xubuntu 20.04

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1873493
   icons missing from main and internal pages
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
   Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875307

Title:
  Missing application icons Gnome-Software Xubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1875307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873493] Re: icons missing from main and internal pages

2020-04-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1864307 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1864307
   Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873493

Title:
  icons missing from main and internal pages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1873493/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861705] Re: The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information.

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631
   "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. 
Refer to the verbose log for more information."
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258
   GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861705

Title:
  The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1861705/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862216] Re: Unclear AppStream message in `update` output

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631
   "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. 
Refer to the verbose log for more information."
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258
   GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862216

Title:
  Unclear AppStream message in `update` output

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1862216/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872258
   GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1866134
   Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918

** Also affects: gnome-software via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Patch added: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+attachment/5358973/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Ooooh, sorry... I was coming from duplicate #1864307, which the patch above 
solves, but I am not sure if this particular issue is solved as well...
So, I don't think #1864307 is a duplicate bug of this, I think those two are 
separate issues (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918 and 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/929 respectively)
Sorry for the noise, I'll unlink those issue reports.

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues #918
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/918

** Patch removed: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+attachment/5358966/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Or rather, use the even better (attached) patch :-P

** Patch added: 
"0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+attachment/5358966/+files/0001-appstream-Don-t-solely-add-a-stock-icon-for-an-app-a.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1866134] Re: Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

2020-04-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You will want this patch, unless there are further modifications to it
in the next few days: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
software/-/commit/d743f920867d8f57beac56191c8912147ef23c8f

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866134

Title:
  Yaru icons are not shown in Gnome-Software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1866134/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872258] [NEW] GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored"

2020-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Hi!
GNOME Software currently injects invalid AppStream metadata in Focal, causing a 
complaint message like "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was 
ignored due to errors." on every APT update.
This can be fixed by applying this patch from upstream and Debian, which was 
present in GNOME's release candidate but was accidentally reverted: 
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/blob/05553c1bfa2124a12e3afe5c63de510310377036/debian/patches/02_fix-appstream-featured-data.patch

Debian already ships this patch.
Thanks for considering!

** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Triaged


** Tags: patch

** Tags added: patch

** Summary changed:

- Injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but some 
metadata was ignored due to errors."
+ GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update completed, but 
some metadata was ignored"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258

Title:
  GS injects invalid metadata, causing "AppStream cache update
  completed, but some metadata was ignored"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1872258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867471] Re: FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+attachment/5337013/+files/appstream_0.12.10-1_to_0.12.10-2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867471

Title:
  FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867471] [NEW] FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
This revision pulls in a few changes from upstream to fix issues or
prevent future annoyances:

fix-free-license-check.patch
A plain bugfix to the "is this a free license?" check of AppStream, which was
introduced in this release. In the current version, licenses which are non-free
may incorrectly be considered free. There isn't much stuff using this feature
yet, but when it does we may as well give a correct result.

ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch
A simple non-functional manual page addition, since people apparently had
a hard time to find the "--explain" switch for the AppStream validator.
There is no potential for regression in this patch.

ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch
Control relations are defined in the upcoming version of the AppStream
specification and define how an application is controlled (keyboard, touch, 
...).
This feature is potentially used *a lot* and the current validator in Ubuntu
will consider the usage of this tag invalid.
With this patch, this tag isn't considered an error anymore, which should
annoy users and developers much less when they are working with
AppStream data on the LTS release.

update-static-data.patch
This just updates the license ID list to what is current in the SPDX
registry.

The regression potential of all of these changes is very low. Having them
will greatly improve the experience of users with AppStream metadata in
Ubuntu, and hopefully may lead to less bug reports upstream ;-)

A full debdiff of the changes is attached. The biggest change is the
non-free-licenses fix, all the other changes are simple few-line changes
or just update static data or help text.

Thanks for considering!

Changelog entries since current focal version 0.12.10-1:

appstream (0.12.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Add fix-free-license-check.patch: Non-free licenses were previously
considered free software, this patch fixes that
  * Add ascli-explain-in-manpage.patch: Explain the `--explain` flag for
`appstreamcli validate` in the manual page as well
  * Add ignore-control-relation-in-validator.patch: Don't fail validation
if control relations exists. This is an upcoming AppStream feature that
will potentially be used quite a lot.
  * Add update-static-data.patch: Update the license and TLD lists to
validate newer licenses correctly.
  * Bump standards version: No changes needed

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:40:14 +0100

** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867471

Title:
  FFe: Sync appstream 0.12.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1867471/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867469] Re: Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems

2020-03-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@lammert-nijhof: Your locale/keyboard layout is likely messed up - type
your password without sudo, to see which password you are actually
typing for your account (and then adjust to the keyboard layout you
currently have for repair)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867469

Title:
  Update failed on allmost all Ubuntu 20.04 systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1867469/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1737466] Re: Kubuntu Discover packaging uses packagekit backend by default; should instead default to Flatpak

2020-03-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: plasma-discover (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737466

Title:
  Kubuntu Discover packaging uses packagekit backend by default; should
  instead default to Flatpak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1737466/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867215] [NEW] FFE: Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-03-12 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

This version only has a single change which fixes a serious regression
in LDC, causing programs built with it to potentially crash.
See https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/3346 for details.

Changelog entries since current focal version 1:1.20.0-1build1:

ldc (1:1.20.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 1.20.1
- This is a bugfix release resolving a regression which created
  an incorrect module constructor execution order.
  See https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/3346

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Sun, 08 Mar 2020 20:14:24 +0100

** Affects: ldc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: ldc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Summary changed:

- Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
+ FFE: Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867215

Title:
  FFE: Sync ldc 1:1.20.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ldc/+bug/1867215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-02-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
There are two things which could be the cause for this:
 1) The appstream-generator used for Focal is old, and there were quite a few 
fixes to find more icons and ignore apps without sufficient icon data in more 
recent releases. @laney will hopefully update the tool ;-)

 2) GNOME Software has a bug which makes it always load stock icons for
applications, even if they are actually not available on the system and
GS should fall back to the cached icons. We've seen this in Debian but I
haven't had the time yet to investigate this further.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307

Title:
  Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1864307/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Technically, PPAs with AppStream data or other repositories with broken data 
can trigger this as well.
AppStream could make a guess who is to blame for the breakage and give a more 
specific error, but that will require some more extensive code changes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861631] Re: "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

2020-02-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This error message is shown not to alert users, but rather make users report 
these issues to the distributor, as this particular issue means the distributor 
has a mistake in their metadata somewhere.
In this case it's not Ubuntu's fault directly, but rather GNOME Software 
injecting invalid metadata.
This is fixed upstream with commit 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/commit/7c1620990b6361fac370b76c9828f8f77ff77a72
 which should land in the next Ubuntu release naturally (but may be 
cherry-picked to make this issue go away even sooner).

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861631

Title:
  "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were
  ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1861631/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1794213] Re: Crash on Upgrade preparation from 18.04 to 18.10 in APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in `appstream >= 0.12.7` (since the code doesn't exist
there anymore). The original issue was likely caused by AppStream not
handling broken metadata correctly, which is an area that has also been
improved greatly.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794213

Title:
  Crash on Upgrade preparation from 18.04 to 18.10 in APT::Update::Post-
  Invoke-Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1794213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1848387] Re: dpkg error when triggers are activated

2020-01-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is resolved in appstream >= 0.12.10-1

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848387

Title:
  dpkg error when triggers are activated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1848387/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon. 
It's simply easier for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 
instead of relying on i386 compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are ID conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains. If someone else works on this, I'd assist the work, but I 
will unlikely work on this myself. I originally intended to, but TBH, this 
issue has really low priority nowadays.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator can be instructed to inject metadata for a specific
package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for adding web applications, but may work
for the multiarch case as well, at least for a select few of high-
profile application packages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718453

Title:
  apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and
  appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1718453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1564570] Re: Gnome Software catalog entry missing for Steam except on i386

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app 
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator tool can be instructed to inject metadata for a
specific package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for web applications, but may work for this
case as well. Steam may be important enough for that exception. The
final decision is up to Ubuntu and the metadata generator admins though.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564570

Title:
  Gnome Software catalog entry missing for Steam except on i386

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1564570/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The specific code that resulted in this issue doesn't exist in newer
AppStream releases, so this sort of is "fixed" that way, as this issue
can't be triggered anymore.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1720552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1567630] Re: Skype not shown as installation candidate

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch 
support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen. It's simply better for app 
authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 
compatibility.
If support was implemented fully, we would download lots of additional big 
metadata and run into all kinds of troubles of which app gets selected when 
there are conflicts.
Resolving all of these issues is possible, but the huge effort IMHO doesn't 
justify the gains.

There is a workaround for high-profile packages that are only available
on one architecture: *If* i386 support is enabled by default, the
appstream-generator can be instructed to inject metadata for a specific
package directly into the final metadata collection. See
https://github.com/ximion/appstream-generator/blob/master/docs/asgen-
config.md#injecting-extra-metainfo--removing-components for details.
This is intended to be used for web applications, but may work for this
case as well.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567630

Title:
  Skype not shown as installation candidate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1567630/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1841130] Re: idle, idle-python is missing from Apps Store

2019-08-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
IDLE has no icon, and apparently never had one:
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/bionic/universe/issues/idle-python3.6.html

The very best way to fix this permanently in the future would be to ask
Python upstream to add a metainfo file for IDLE as described in
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Quickstart.html
#sect-Quickstart-DesktopApps

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1841130

Title:
  idle, idle-python is missing from Apps Store

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1841130/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1825766] Re: search results don't match apt search

2019-04-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
You can expect to find an app in GNOME Software if it is a GUI
application (== has a .desktop file in /usr/share/applications/ that
isn't NoDisplay and of Type=Application). For anything else (that likely
includes phpMyAdmin) GNOME Software isn't the right tool and wasn't
designed for.

Apps will also definitely show up if they have AppStream metainfo files of type 
desktop-application (so service-types are also excluded here, currently).
Also it appears that on Ubuntu Snaps aren't filtered by type.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825766

Title:
  search results don't match apt search

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1825766/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2019-04-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It's worth mentioning that while PackageKit will likely not receive much
feature development unless someone steps up to do that, it is in solid
maintenance mode and likely will remain like that for quite some time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673258

Title:
  Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1673258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1799851] Re: Software Boutique window suddenly shows Welcome window and looses all the apps I queued to install

2018-10-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
GNOME Software might be the wrong package, the MATE Software Boutique is
a different app. A quick search suggests that it might be part of the
MATE welcome center, but a look into the package couldn't confirm that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799851

Title:
  Software Boutique window suddenly shows Welcome window and looses all
  the apps I queued to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1799851/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1798822] Re: GLib-ERROR on refresh-cache

2018-10-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1792537 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792537

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1792537
   
/usr/bin/appstreamcli:5:g_variant_new_parsed_va:g_variant_builder_add_parsed:as_content_rating_to_variant:as_component_to_variant:as_cache_file_save

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798822

Title:
  GLib-ERROR  on refresh-cache

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1798822/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Yes, I completely missed that change, this needs to be changed.
I need to prepare a new upload for Debian anyway, maybe I can change this 
behavior on the weekend at Debian.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790613

Title:
  Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1790613/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
We don't actively kill PackageKit when updating it, we just tell the daemon to 
quit itself as soon as possible if it can do so.
Also, a packagekitd times out automatically when inactive.
So this crash really shouldn't happen...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790613

Title:
  Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1790613/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1790693] Re: appstreamcli crash when attempting release upgrade to cosmic

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

While the actual bug is fixed in cosmic already, it might make sense to
backport it to ensure upgrades run smoothly.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790693

Title:
  appstreamcli crash when attempting release upgrade to cosmic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1790693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790220] Re: Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-09-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you! :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790220

Title:
  Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debspawn/+bug/1790220/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1790220] [NEW] Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

The 0.1.0 version was synced just seconds before the import freeze, and since
it was the initial version of this package has a few annoying bugs (like 
packages
missing in chroots) that would be nice to get fixed in cosmic.

Since this package is entirely new, there is no regression potential in
syncing it.

Changelog entries since current cosmic version 0.1.0-1:

debspawn (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.2.0
  * Add missing Vcs-* URLs

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:52:36 +0200

** Affects: debspawn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: debspawn (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790220

Title:
  Sync debspawn 0.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debspawn/+bug/1790220/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1789023] Re: Widelands package from Universe is not in the Software Center

2018-08-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
The widelands package/metadata needs fixing for it to appear. See
http://appstream.ubuntu.com/cosmic/universe/issues/widelands.html

** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Also affects: widelands (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789023

Title:
  Widelands package from Universe is not in the Software Center

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/widelands/+bug/1789023/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1788923] Re: MyPaint website button goes to wrong website

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: gnome-software (Ubuntu) => mypaint (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788923

Title:
  MyPaint website button goes to wrong website

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mypaint/+bug/1788923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1788894] Re: Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not an issue in appstream, but likely the Ubuntu archive.
But it could also be snapcraft doing something weird (that cache path is odd!).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788894

Title:
   Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1788894/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 450410] Re: Uses deprecated dpkg --print-installation-architecture

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed for a while already.

** Changed in: makedev (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450410

Title:
  Uses deprecated dpkg --print-installation-architecture

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedev/+bug/450410/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1675163] Re: Don't attempt to create devices in LXC containers

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FWIW, I ran into that issue today as well, and it was really annoying. So I 
fixed in in Debian in a generic way, so this should work for every container 
solution out there.
It requires systemd-detect-virt (systemd) to be installed prior to installing 
makedev though (which usually is the case).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675163

Title:
  Don't attempt to create devices in LXC containers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedev/+bug/1675163/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1788112] Re: font-manager does not appear in gnome-software

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@jbicha: Those changes will *never* affect a released Debian or Ubuntu version, 
only in-development stuff.
The earliest point I actually would consider making such a change is after the 
Debian Buster release and at least one release before the next Ubuntu LTS. 
Also, the amount of packages with issues should be really low at that point, 
ideally be zero.

And all the things that I might adjust yield at least an AppStream warning-type 
hint for 2-3 years already, and the old-location one is a Lintian warning too.
So people know about it and there's still plenty of time to adapt :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788112

Title:
  font-manager does not appear in gnome-software

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1788112/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1788112] Re: ubuntu software not synced with synaptic

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It would be neat though if font-manager fixed at least the issues listed
at https://appstream.debian.org/sid/main/issues/font-manager.html with
its metadata.

I do actually plan to not have ancient metadata processed anymore at
some point in the future (ancient data is really rare in the archive
nowadays, even).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788112

Title:
  ubuntu software not synced with synaptic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/font-manager/+bug/1788112/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1788175] Re: AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package lists... Done E: Problem executing scripts

2018-08-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a bug in fwupd/the LVFS data that AFAIK was already fixed there.

** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => fwupd (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788175

Title:
  AppStream system cache was updated, but problems were found: Metadata
  files have errors: /var/cache/app-info/xmls/fwupd.xml Reading package
  lists... Done E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke-
  Success 'if /usr/bin/test -w /var/cache/app-info -a -e
  /usr/bin/appstreamcli; then appstreamcli refresh-cache > /dev/null;
  fi' E: Sub-process returned an error code

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1788175/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1787821] Re: appstreamcli refresh crashes with glib error

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787821

Title:
  appstreamcli refresh crashes with glib error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787821/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is fixed in Debian now, in package appstream/0.12.2-2.


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #906538
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538

** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1787774] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787774

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See the linked upstream issue for details - this will be fixed soon.

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Bug watch added: github.com/ximion/appstream/issues #198
   https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198

** Also affects: appstream via
   https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

Title:
  g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1785498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1787802] Re: appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1785498 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1787774
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1785498
   g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787802

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with signal 5 in g_variant_new_parsed_va()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1787802/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1709144] Re: /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or corruption (!prev): ADDR ***

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This issue was actually fixed in AppStream ages ago - definitely
resolved in Bionic+.

** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709144

Title:
  /usr/bin/appstreamcli:*** Error in `appstreamcli': double free or
  corruption (!prev): ADDR ***

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1709144/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1774491] Re: pkcon install fails -- proxy?

2018-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This very much looks like a bug int Aptdaemon's PK compatibility layer
to me. At this point, it likely makes no sense to fix this issue, since
that code has been dropped after the Xenial release.

@tlc: This will likely be a won't fix bug, please upgrade to Bionic if you can. 
If you can't upgrade, you can try to switch from the compat layer to the real 
PK daemon, if the system allows you to do that:
sudo apt purge python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat  ; sudo apt install packagekit


** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => aptdaemon (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774491

Title:
  pkcon install fails -- proxy?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1774491/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1773825] Re: Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs, but Writer recent docs

2018-05-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => libreoffice (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773825

Title:
  Libre Impress 'Recently Used' list does not have Impress recent docs,
  but Writer recent docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1773825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1773535] Re: Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email

2018-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => firefox (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773535

Title:
  Delicate failure with Ubuntu when using Firebox email

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1773535/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295986] Re: After checking for updates, apper incorrectly shows system is up to date

2018-04-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue on Ubuntu 18.04?

** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295986

Title:
  After checking for updates, apper incorrectly shows system is up to
  date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apper/+bug/1295986/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1412733] Re: apper search doesn't provide any results

2018-04-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Is this still an issue on Ubuntu 18.04?

** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1412733

Title:
  apper search doesn't provide any results

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apper/+bug/1412733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766591] Re: Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like this actually has been synced in time! Awesome!

** Changed in: dcontainers (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766591

Title:
  Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dcontainers/+bug/1766591/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762293] Re: FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Jup, a backport would make sense, and fortunately should be very easy
due to appstream itself being up-to-date in Bionic :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762293

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-generator/+bug/1762293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762293] Re: FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Since today is the final release date of Bionic, there is no way this
update will go in.

** Changed in: appstream-generator (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762293

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-generator/+bug/1762293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766591] [NEW] Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main)

Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.8.0~alpha.5-2:

dcontainers (0.8.0~alpha.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.8.0~alpha.6
  * Drop patches: Applied upstream

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:04:26 +0200

dcontainers (0.8.0~alpha.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Update maintainer address to tracker.d.o
  * fix-gc-hashmap-crash.patch: Fix crash in GC collection when
using a HashMap containing GC-managed elements

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:06:10 +0200

** Affects: dcontainers (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Wishlist
 Status: New

** Changed in: dcontainers (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766591

Title:
  Sync dcontainers 0.8.0~alpha.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dcontainers/+bug/1766591/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1716900] Re: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716900

Title:
  apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1716900/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1720552] Re: appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720552

Title:
  appstreamcli crashed with SIGSEGV in gvs_tuple_needed_size()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1720552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice, thank you all! :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1762292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762292] Re: FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It is built now in 
https://launchpad.net/~ximion/+archive/ubuntu/appstream/+packages (it appears 
like enabling more architectures either needs approval or doesn't cause package 
already in the archive not to be built on these...)
Let me know if there is anything more I can do to help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1762292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Relevant upstream bug reports:
https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/3336 (crash) and
https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3337 (flags not applied).

** Bug watch added: github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues #3337
   https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3337

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762563

Title:
  Does not build/test D code properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "02_add-d-feature-flags-tests.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+attachment/5108528/+files/02_add-d-feature-flags-tests.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762563

Title:
  Does not build/test D code properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762563] [NEW] Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Hi!
The current Meson version in Ubuntu has two regressions which cause D code 
builds to fail.
This issue is very annoying to have in an LTS release, and it might even cause 
existing packages in Ubuntu to FTBFS on a full archive rebuild (it definitely 
causes them to skip tests, which is very annoying).
The next Meson version (likely 0.46, planned for release very soon) will have 
these issues fixed, but if that version does not get included in Bionic, please 
consider applying the attached patches to the Meson package.
Thanks!
Matthias

** Affects: meson (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Status: New

** Patch added: "01_fix-d-module-versions-crash.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762563/+attachment/5108527/+files/01_fix-d-module-versions-crash.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762563

Title:
  Does not build/test D code properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762563] Re: Does not build/test D code properly

2018-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "03_fix-d-feature-flags-apply.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+attachment/5108529/+files/03_fix-d-feature-flags-apply.patch

** Changed in: meson (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762563

Title:
  Does not build/test D code properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meson/+bug/1762563/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762293] [NEW] FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported:

Please sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main)

This new release brings a ton of improvements to the AppStream metadata
generation process and fixes lots of old bugs, so having it in the
Bionic LTS release would be very useful so users (and Ubuntu itself) can
generate high-quality AppStream metadata.

Updating appstream-generator means that appstream itself needs to be updated 
first. Updating appstream-generator has a very low (if not zero) regression 
potential, since nothing depends on it and the new version has received 
extensive testing on Debian's infrastructure and on Arch Linux.
Updating appstream itself is introduces new features and API, and its FFE is 
tracked as LP: #1762292 - if that FFE for appstream is not granted, 
appstream-generator can not be updated.

Updating appstream-generator also requires minor updates of gir-to-d and
(optionally) mustache-d (packages only used by appstream-generator in
Debian/Ubuntu).

Notable changes in the new release:

Version 0.7.1
~~
Released: 2018-04-06

Features:
 * debian: Use TagFile class from Laniakea
 * debian: Use the packages real architecture in its identifier
 * debian: Implement packageForFile backend feature
 * Do more complex parsing of metainfo license expressions
 * ci: Enable more static analysis checks
 * Improve manual page

Bugfixes:
 * Never upscale icons if we don't need to, use pixmaps directory as last resort
 * Update wrap files to work with gir-to-d >= 0.14
 * Don't try to upscale tiny icons from the pixmaps directory
 * Register HiDPI icons for fonts properly
 * Fix some minor style issues found by D-Scanner
 * Document WorkspaceDir config file option

Version 0.7.0
~~
Released: 2018-04-04

Features:
 * stdx.allocator-backed containers library
 * Use stdx.allocator-backed HashMap in more places
 * Trigger GC less aggressively, use smaller parallel work unit sizes
 * Allow setting a workspace in config and calling asgen on a config file
 * Add backend interface for processing a single package
 * Allow calling only the metadata publication step
 * Add framework for extracting data directly from package files
 * Allow setting icon policy in configuration
 * Add support for more icon types and customizable icon policy
 * Allow icon upscaling in certain cases, but complain about it
 * Modernize Meson definitions
 * Document how to modify icon policies in configuration
 * Use AppStream 0.12.0 and format 0.12 by default

Bugfixes:
 * Update wrap files to be compatible with gir-to-d >= 0.13
 * Improve ArchiveDecompressor usage
 * For each array appender, try to guess capacity to reserve better
 * Properly add remote icon URLs
 * Fetch JavaScript bits with Yarn instead of Bower
 * Ensure we can run asgen again from its build directory
 * Ignore data from immutable suites on cleanup
 * Don't parallelize cleanup data collection routine
 * Release memory chunks faster during cleanup operations


Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.6.8-2build2:

appstream-generator (0.7.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * fix-32bit-build.patch: Update patch

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:28:48 +0200

appstream-generator (0.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * fix-32bit-build.patch: Fix FTBFS on 32bit architectures

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:16:16 +0200

appstream-generator (0.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.7.1
  * Build-depend on gir-to-d (>= 0.14)

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:47:44 +0200

appstream-generator (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.7.0
  * Drop patches: Applied upstream
  * Update Vcs-* URLs for switch to Salsa
  * Bump dh compat level to 11
  * Use dh-dlang
  * Update dependencies
- Build-dep libappstream-dev >= 0.12.0
- New build-dep libdcontainers-dev

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:44:24 +0200

Build logs and additional QA can be found at Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/appstream-generator

** Affects: appstream-generator (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762293

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream-generator 0.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-generator/+bug/1762293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1762292] [NEW] FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-04-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
e locale.
Improved localization is a good thing.

 * qt: Define location and soname for all configurations, not just Debug

This patch has been in Ubuntu before. Without it, Qt applications using
AppStream wouldn't build at all in release mode.

 * Never override high-quality data with incomplete .desktop data

Fixes an issue that would override more complete metadata with less
complete versions and also change the metadata after the user installed
an application.

 * Make data update script work with recent SPDX

Just a maintenance improvement on the source code itself with no impact
on the installed binaries and data.

 * Add a timeout to URL validity checks

Before, appstreamcli would just hang forever when validating on systems
with no network access, causing some annoyances especially on CI
systems.

The package is not causing issues in Debian and other distributions, so far 
there have been no new bug reports. In general, I think the risk of new issues 
is low, especially because the new features don't impact the existing common 
code paths much and are additions (although obviously there is no such thing as 
no regressions risk).
I think the bugfixes especially on HiDPI icons and metadata replacement, as 
well as features like the updated SPDX license library and SPDX 3.0 support and 
that updating this package allows for a more recent appstream-generator package 
to be included make it reasonable to update the package.

Changelog entries since current bionic version 0.11.8-3:

appstream (0.12.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * load-desktop-data.patch: Load desktop file data properly again

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:30:08 +0200

appstream (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Make autopkgtest work again
  * Update d/copyright (Closes: #894856)
  * icon config: Pull in non-HiDPI config for large icons
if large-icon HiDPI config is installed

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:12:26 +0200

appstream (0.12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version: 0.12.0
  * Drop all patches: Applied upstream
  * Update .symbols file
  * d/rules: Drop obsolete --parallel flag
  * Add APT config snippet packages for an easy way of enabling
icon downloads for different sizes and HiDPI.

 -- Matthias Klumpp   Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:36:26 +0200

Build logs and other QA data can be found at Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/appstream

** Affects: appstream (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762292

Title:
  FFE: Sync appstream 0.12.0-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1762292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1758968] Re: Sync dub 1.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2018-03-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, the issue is fixed and I made a convenience upload with the change to 
Debian (we already have a similar change already in the package that is mostly 
useful for Ubuntu).
You basically need this patch 
https://salsa.debian.org/d-team/dub/commit/699af0cfe4db8239b21d13c1d46769b7667cb881
 or just sync version 1.8.0-2 from Debian.
Thanks for updating the package in Ubuntu!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758968

Title:
  Sync dub 1.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dub/+bug/1758968/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >