[Bug 424789] Re: PHP random segfaults on session_start();
I confirm this behavior as well. A php script with nothing more than session_start() will randomly segfault. I haven't been able to produce any similar issues with php-cli. -- PHP random segfaults on session_start(); https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252001] Re: dselect: failed to create baselist pad
I have the same problem. I'm guessing it has to do with how large the package lists are today.. It appears that this bug is related to recent fixes upstream, but the patch listed below did not help and I haven't had time to pull the latest upstream and build a new package from scratch... http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-dpkg- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01498.html -- dselect: failed to create baselist pad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247775] Re: Nautilus dies easily on bad gconf data (design flaw)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15973708/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15973709/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15973710/ProcStatus.txt -- Nautilus dies easily on bad gconf data (design flaw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247775 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247775] [NEW] Nautilus dies easily on bad gconf data (design flaw)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Symptom: Immediate crash on attempt to open the Edit/Preferences dialog. This occurred every time until the cause was found: While digging through backtrace I noticed this: #6 0xb7f05d5e in eel_preferences_get (name=0x87d6620 preferences/default_folder_viewer) at eel-preferences.c:480 This corresponds to dummy error printed on console at time of crash: assertion failed: (value-type == GCONF_VALUE_STRING) Sure enough, /apps/nautilus/preferences/default_folder_viewer value was set to an integer. Changed back to default type/value (String / icon_view) in gconf-editor and problem disappeared. So I suppose there are two questions here: 1.) How did it get set that way? (probably will never know..) 2.) Why is gconf (or perhaps libeel2) type handling not more robust? Something so trivial ought not have the potential to be so catastrophic. This problem was ridiculously hard to track down and the average user would never be able to fix something like this, nor would an intermediate user be able to find a solution by googling. (no bug-buddy, no nautilus debug log was generated, and it could have been any gconf value corrupted) Correct behavior should be to reset the bad value to its default as a graceful failure mode, instead of just dying without any (user apparent) explanation. Anyone know if upstream has considered a better solution? note: I'm not a GNOME dev.. just switched from being a long-time KDE user actually :) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jul 11 22:29:44 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.22.3-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-386 i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Nautilus dies easily on bad gconf data (design flaw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247775 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178571] Re: flashplugin-nonfree doesn't install in feisty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173890 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 173890 flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version? -- flashplugin-nonfree doesn't install in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178571] Re: flashplugin-nonfree doesn't install in feisty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173890 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890 Maintainers: This needs to be considered a top priority fix. Adobe recently released a critical security fix (version 9.0.115, see below) and thus the checksum is now different. (package was based on version 9.0.48) This package needs to be updated immediately so that 1.) existing users get the security update 2.) new users can install the package properly. http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb07-20.html -- flashplugin-nonfree doesn't install in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
