[Bug 942043] Re: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6
** Description changed: Description: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release: 10.04 initscripts: 2.87dsf-4ubuntu17.5 I expect my system to kill all processes, umount all volumes gracefully or forcefully. By default the symlinks for umountfs, umountroot, sendsigs, reboot and umountnfs.sh are created as S-links (start) but the scripts only handles the stop option. The scripts should be installed as K-scripts or disabled in case upstart should handle these. Note: upstart doesn't handle stale processes before running it's umount -a in mountall-shell.conf so any left process will cause a blocked umount and an unclean file system and a fsck on boot. A workaround is to manually change the boot order. + + [Edit] + System specification: + 64G memory + 2 AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 (24 cores) + x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942043 Title: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/942043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942043] Re: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 858122 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 The bug report #858122 doesn't deal with the fact that scripts are linked as Start rather then Stop. I think that #858122 should deal with the problem but until then it should not be a duplicate. I've placed a comment about it but there is no related discussion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942043 Title: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/942043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
Just a note... I can't get why the sendsig (for example) does have a S-link. The script does only handle stop (start is a no-op). Same goes for umountfs etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
Sorry! I managed to click on a link that changed the status with no questions asked (just wanted to get an explanation of the status). Can someone undo the Status change? I can't undo it myself :-/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942043] [NEW] Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release:10.04 initscripts: 2.87dsf-4ubuntu17.5 I expect my system to kill all processes, umount all volumes gracefully or forcefully. By default the symlinks for umountfs, umountroot, sendsigs, reboot and umountnfs.sh are created as S-links (start) but the scripts only handles the stop option. The scripts should be installed as K-scripts or disabled in case upstart should handle these. Note: upstart doesn't handle stale processes before running it's umount -a in mountall-shell.conf so any left process will cause a blocked umount and an unclean file system and a fsck on boot. A workaround is to manually change the boot order. ** Affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942043 Title: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/942043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 842746] [NEW] libreadline5-dev should provide libreadline-dev
Public bug reported: Description: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release: 10.04 Package: libreadline5-dev 5.2-7build1 libreadline6-dev provides libreadline-dev but libreadline5-dev does not. But lib32readline5-dev does provide lib32readline-dev. It's a problem with swi-prolog since it requires libreadline-dev. ** Affects: readline5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842746 Title: libreadline5-dev should provide libreadline-dev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/readline5/+bug/842746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 696758] [NEW] /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh fails on high UID
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: speech-dispatcher There are problems with /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh: - it assumes that the id never will be higher than the max port - it guesses that the generated port number is free - getent gets confused by numeric usernames ** Affects: speech-dispatcher (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696758 Title: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh fails on high UID -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 601114] Re: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER
There are other problems with the profile shell fragment: - it assumes that the id never will be higher than the max port - it guesses that the generated port number is free - getent gets confused by numeric usernames Also reported in Bug #696758. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601114 Title: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694953] [NEW] missing i386 libraries on amd64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: winbind It is common to use 32 bit proprietary applications like flashplayer, citrix and acrobat on a amd64 system. The NSS libraries are a vital part of the system as it enables programs to lookup user and group information. To solve this problem today we have to extract the nss library from the 32 bit package and install it by hand. I think that this should be provided by the winbind package. Please add the 32 bit nss_winbind library to the winbind package for amd64. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694953 Title: missing i386 libraries on amd64 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694953] [NEW] missing i386 libraries on amd64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: winbind It is common to use 32 bit proprietary applications like flashplayer, citrix and acrobat on a amd64 system. The NSS libraries are a vital part of the system as it enables programs to lookup user and group information. To solve this problem today we have to extract the nss library from the 32 bit package and install it by hand. I think that this should be provided by the winbind package. Please add the 32 bit nss_winbind library to the winbind package for amd64. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694953 Title: missing i386 libraries on amd64 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605299] Re: missing i386 libraries on amd64
I don't deploy this package no more so we are not affected anymore. But I feel the need to say that if a PAM module provider have a serious approach they must take the problem to run i386 programs on an amd64 system seriously. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605299 Title: missing i386 libraries on amd64 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605299] Re: missing i386 libraries on amd64
Yes, we need to have a 32bit pam_lwidentity.so and dependencies. -- missing i386 libraries on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605299] [NEW] missing i386 libraries on amd64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 likewise-open: Installed: 5.4.0.42111-2ubuntu1 We currently got tools written in java that must run in a i386 java version. There are no i386 libraries provided by likewise-open so user and group lookups fails. Workarounds for this is to install nscd or pick and install libraries from a i386 installation (unmaintainable). BR Emil Assarsson ** Affects: likewise-open (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- missing i386 libraries on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117991] Re: lack of http-proxy support
+1 -- lack of http-proxy support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548893] Re: 1.7.2p1ubuntu3 (lucid) :Gid Duplicate verification problem with likewise
I encountered this problem with the ppa package of likewise-open https://launchpad.net/~likewise-open/+archive/likewise-open-ppa?field.series_filter=lucid After installing the old it started to work again. -- 1.7.2p1ubuntu3 (lucid) :Gid Duplicate verification problem with likewise https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574354] [NEW] update-gconf-defaults permissions on create
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gconf2 Ubuntu 9.10 gconf2 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 update-gconf-defaults relies on users umask when creating new files. I think that the tool should know that the files must be readable by all users to set their policy. I encountered this problem using cfengine that executes update-gconf-defaults with umask 700. - umask 077 cat /usr/share/gconf/mandatory/90_gnome-screensaver EOF /apps/gnome-power-manager/lock/blank_screen true /apps/gnome-power-manager/lock/use_screensaver_settings false /apps/gnome-screensaver/idle_delay 20 /apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_enabled true /apps/gnome-screensaver/logout_enabled true /desktop/gnome/session/idle_delay 18 EOF chmod 644 /usr/share/gconf/mandatory/90_gnome-screensaver update-gconf-defaults --manatory ls -s /var/lib/gconf/debian.mandatory/%gconf-tree.xml -rw--- 1 root root 741 2010-04-28 16:37 /var/lib/gconf/debian.mandatory/%gconf-tree.xml - ** Affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update-gconf-defaults permissions on create https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475679] Re: Mapping a Windows DFS share doesn't properly show me the filesystem.
This is a problem at our site. We need to use a workaround where we use smbclient -k '\\dfs\path\' -c 'list' to get the real path to the server. Windows administrators feels the need to move things around so we can't publish the real path instead. I would like to have importance elevated to at least medium. -- Mapping a Windows DFS share doesn't properly show me the filesystem. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475679 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458785] Re: can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire
I think that this bug should have importance set to medium. It is a problem in a big organization to handle all the support calls and comments about this :-P -- can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to likewise-open5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 458785] Re: can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire
I think that this bug should have importance set to medium. It is a problem in a big organization to handle all the support calls and comments about this :-P -- can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
