[Bug 1844453]
Also: https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/oauth2ooo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #92) FYI: https://github.com/google/gmail- oauth2-tools/wiki/OAuth2DotPyRunThrough -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
@cloph: could we possibly use some Python library ( https://oauth.net/code/python/ ), like we use smtplib in our scripting/source/pyprov/mailmerge.py, which implements com::sun::star::mail::XMailServiceProvider etc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #80) > The patch should be included in the daily builds available at > https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. > ... > Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. Please note that daily builds are created without necessary configurations parameters, so those builds do not include gdrive support: this means that they can't be used for testing of the patches mentioned in comments 80 and 81. OTOH, 7.2.0 RC2 is going to be available soon. Please wait for the release candidate for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1186702]
Our home-grown non-standard vnd.sun.star.webdav(s) schemes should be dropped in favor of the office URI schemes supported since 5.3 [1], hence this should be supposedly closed WONTFIX. [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.3#Office_URI_Schemes_support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186702 Title: WebDAV: LibreOffice does not handle vnd.sun.star.webdav protocol out- of-the-box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1186702/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462564]
*** Bug 138602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462564 Title: [Upstream] Deleting a column in Writer deletes whole table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/462564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1900454]
*** Bug 137843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900454 Title: Calc doesn't recalculate formulas on cell content changes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1900454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1261048]
WORKSFORME with Version: 7.0.3.1 (x64) Build ID: d7547858d014d4cf69878db179d326fc3483e082 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261048 Title: [Upstream] Wrong results from rounding functions for large argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1261048/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 892476]
Documentation bug fixed in https://git.libreoffice.org/help/+/55d4e405d8dbdf58ba45823b3895e8a79e5a8aed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892476 Title: [Upstream] Regular expression "\n" in replace field inputs "\n" instead of paragraph break To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/892476/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844453]
Questions on AskLibO: https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/228561 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/228235 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/98400 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/205890 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/215674 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/209927 https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/182924 ... and more. Xisco: a topic for ESC? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453 Title: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1796698]
Actually, although the problem actually doesn't manifest now for majority of cases, it still is reproducible like this: 1. Create a new spreadsheet 2. Go to last column: AMJ (Ctrl+Arrow Right) 3. Change the width of column AMJ 4. Save as XLSX. The reason is the code in sc/source/filter/excel/xetable.cxx introduced in https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/64274b38f6cc50a8bb49f114f1ac9e7c1c3b3c4f back in 2009: that was the commit introduced export to XLSX (integrated to LO from Go-oo). The code starts with this comment: > // if last column is equal to last possible column, Excel adds one more which is directly taken from the older code that exports to XLS binary formats. Obviously, this is just a left-over from copy-paste. When writing to OOXML format, Excel doesn't do that. Setting to NEW. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796698 Title: [upstream] Assigns style to columns it cannot handle in .xlsx files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1796698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1796698]
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/86046 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796698 Title: [upstream] Assigns style to columns it cannot handle in .xlsx files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1796698/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1825741]
*** Bug 123484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825741 Title: [upstream] Multiple instances of global menu entries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1825741/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1736176]
(In reply to Vladimir from comment #22) > ... and when i diceded to google it - what i saw? Proposal to change default > befaviour of so many distros and DEs instead of adding a simple option? Amazing how hard reading is. Instead of seeing what actually is here (the proposal confirmed and set to NEW, supported by UX, and set to easy hack with code pointers, to help anyone interested to jump in and fix it), one sees such bizarre things you couldn't imagine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736176 Title: Can't jump between cells when non-english input layout is active To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1736176/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1423034]
Please note that the improvement should not disable interoperability: user needs to be able to see similar/familiar strings from other applications. Even if something looks "incomprehensible", it's actually less issue than "easy-to-understand" name that doesn't ring a bell to user that saw it multiple times in other apps with a different name. Actually, for an average user, no text would be easy enough. But familiarity, and also googleability are of importance. So - please also use usual names (maybe in parentheses after improved string). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423034 Title: [upstream] Improve the wording of "Paste Special" options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1423034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1423034]
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13) > ... > calc8 - Calc object [Remark: what's the difference to standard paste > operation?] Regarding the cited line from Heiko's comment: one of the formats is the default one chosen when user pastes normally (Ctrl+V). It would help to see the "(default)" after the format that is selected that way (see e.g. bug 116685 where the default for one operation is discussed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423034 Title: [upstream] Improve the wording of "Paste Special" options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1423034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1423034]
Also I'd say Heiko please just do the change, it might be fine-tuned later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423034 Title: [upstream] Improve the wording of "Paste Special" options To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1423034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
Finally fixed by commits https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9886a69c472f212d88f11cfa0f3835e5dcf485b2 - https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8d107b8d3b33b16436fbe64a5e296ec5a2c69e5d (tellingly codenamed OperationSmiley :) ) Thank you Armin and Thorsten! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
(In reply to Papamatti from comment #90) > What for are these dots necessary? See comment 86. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
Armin, seeing your last commits, can't they be ultimately applicable here (since the problem here is that the fill must use the same geometry for different paths, and the dots are created to define the fill geometry boundaries - see comment 85 and comment 86)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #88) I still see the dots at some zoom levels (e.g., 12,5%) in PDF viewer. Same as in LibreOffice itself... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
The problem caused by following lines in EnhancedCustomShape2d.cxx:
>if( !bLineGeometryNeededOnly )
>{
>// hack aNewB2DPolyPolygon to fill logic rect - this is
>// needed to produce gradient fills that look like mso
>aNewB2DPolygon.clear();
>aNewB2DPolygon.append(basegfx::B2DPoint(0,0));
>aNewB2DPolygon.setClosed(true);
>aNewB2DPolyPolygon.append(aNewB2DPolygon);
>
>aNewB2DPolygon.clear();
>aNewB2DPolygon.append(basegfx::B2DPoint(aLogicRect.GetWidth(),
>aLogicRect.GetHeight()));
>aNewB2DPolygon.setClosed(true);
>aNewB2DPolyPolygon.append(aNewB2DPolygon);
>}
Disabling this codepath stops adding the points. Current AOO code
doesn't contain these lines.
This is added by:
author Thorsten Behrens 2010-10-26 21:04:44 (GMT)
committer Thorsten Behrens 2010-10-26 21:04:44
(GMT)
commit f64ef72743e55389e446e0d4bc6febd475011023
tree13dacfb392466476bbe647c74520fa1e4eb860af
parent 5e1626f2cf40d4b52128d4464e838b8df0be55a7
> Better shading algo for customshapes, better gradients
> Some custom shapes can have shaded parts, like for example 3d can,
> the bevelled buttons etc. Those shaded colors are calculated
> internally, and have been way off at times. Now using HSV color
> space & the originally documented luminance modifications in steps
> of 10 percent. Compared to MSO, still no 100 percent match, but
> that seems due to gamma correction there.
> Additionally, starting with MSO12, gradients on those shaded surfaces
> look much better; adapted code to display gradients equally nice.
>
> Note that most of this patch also applies to ooxml import; note as
> well that customshapes from *all* kind of input files (including ODF
> docs) now look different than before; no real way of changing this
> in a backward-compatible way, since behaviour of custom shapes is
> mandated (mostly) by internal tables, and not stored in a file.
>
> Applies patches/dev300/ppt-customshape-shading-fix (much of it was
> accepted at OOo already, via i#102797)
>
> Applies patches/dev300/ppt-customshape-shading-fix.diff: fixed prob
> with line arrows - the extra-added single point polygons lead to
> extra arrows randomly around the custom shape. i#105654
The problem isn't in PDF export, so removing filter:pdf keyword. To see
it on screen, one needs to disable OpenGL and AntiAliasing in
Tools->Options->LibreOffice->View. In older versions, one may look for
AntiAliasing in Expert Configuration or in config files.
The code was applied to OOo in i#102797, and was reverted later in
i#105654. However, they still were reproducible in Linux distros before
LO, possibly as part of GoOO (in 3.1 and 3.2 versions of OOo under SUSE
and Ubuntu: see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=108658 and
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=115511).
The OOo issue didn't contain any clear specifications or test cases,
only patches, neither are there any unit tests on this, so I cannot
check if reverting this part of commit breaks something.
A patch (that reverts these lines) is submitted for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/35498. Thorsten, I added you as reviewer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349
Title:
[Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots
in Acroread, not in Evince
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
The patch mentioned in comment 85 is abandoned because of breakage of https://blog.thebehrens.net/2009/07/21/selected-interop-improvement-how- to-fill-ppt-autoshapes/. Reassigning to default as I haven't resources to work on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689349]
Adjusting the earliest affected version to 3.3.0 (according to comment 54 and my own testing - already REPRODUCIBLE with 3.3.0.4 under Win7x64). Adjusting the component: this problem not only affect Draw, but also any other module capable of using shapes, connectors etc. Tested with Version 4.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 335a8a84fe6349fd716d4978346cfff9c884dd9b, both Writer and Calc produce PDFs with dots around smileys (although there seems to be no way to convert them to polygons). Not sure if graphic stack is a proper component, maybe should be more generic Libreoffice? Removing defunct CC address with autoreply robot on other side (expecting one more unwanted message). I have a proposition. What if we don't fix this, but simply call it feature: imagine the new LO logo having smiling face and those two (not so tiny) dots! '*_*, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689349 Title: [Upstream] Draw file exported to PDF have erroneous pixel-sized dots in Acroread, not in Evince To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/689349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1064560]
The test document seems to be broken. 1. If I open the file using any version starting from 3.3.0.4 and up to 4.1.1.2 under Win7x64, it opens with first page empty. When I scroll it down (so that I see some graphics on some pages), and then return to the first page, there are ghost graphics in the top left corner of the first page. They may be selected and moved, but if I scroll the document down and up again, they disappear and other graphics appear. 2. The 4.1.2.1 opens the document (with empty first page), and then crashes after a couple of seconds (looks like it continues to process the document after initial display, and the crash happens on some stage of this delayed processing). So, the problem is worse in 4.1.2.1. Despite the document itself is broken, I think the bug should be fixed, because the crash indicates some flaw in the code that doesn't expect something wrong in the input data. Fixing it will make the software more robust. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064560 Title: [Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGABRT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1064560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1064560]
LO 3.6.1.2 under Win7Pro_x64: Save as RTF - Error saving the document Save as DOC (97/XP/2003) - Crash but Save as DOC (95) - OK -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064560 Title: soffice.bin crashed with SIGABRT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1064560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1064560]
Excuse me, the previous comment is partially incorrect. If I open the file and immediately try to save as DOC (either 95 or 97+), LO crashes. But if I open the file, then try to save as RTF, get the error message, then try to save as DOC (either 95 or 97+), then the operation succeedes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064560 Title: soffice.bin crashed with SIGABRT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1064560/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
