[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Updated version in REVU, now with added CDBS and separate documentation package. Please test and comment. -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
New revision with latest upstream fixes and updated copyright detauls in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ruby/+archive -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256821] Re: Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Bug forwarded to Debian: Bug#495312 2008/8/14 Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Neil: do you think you can forward the fix to Debian? -- Neil Wilson -- Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/14 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Some comments: - debian/operating_system.rb is not properly licensed, and not mentioned in debian/copyright. Agreed. That needs some tidying up. I can't see any copyright message in there about the debian packaging either. Does Debian need that as well? - I'm still not convinced by your update-alternatives hack. This should *really* go upstream, so it's fixed for every distro, not just Ubuntu. It will do Lucas, but that won't happen in the week I have before feature freeze. Please consider this a pragmatic prototype. - why the switch to simple-patchsys? That's easy - it's simpler :-). cdbs-edit-patch is the bees knees. No longer do I hate patching. - you base your version on a git snapshot, with a 5kloc diff compared to the current version in debian unstable. Is that really reasonable, since we are far in the Ubuntu release cycle AFAIK? I have it on good authority that the version in Debian may very well be out of date by the end of the month. ;-) - have you talked to Daigo Moriwaki about those deep changes to his Debian package? If not, when do you plan to? At the moment Debian bug #403407 is still marked won't fix so there is clearly going to be a divergence whatever happens. You really need to alter the bug status if Debian is serious about fixing the path problem. I'd be more than happy to sync up with the excellent work Daigo has done on his package, but they're never going to be the same until Debian accepts that the problem is fixable. Can you do something about that? - You never answered by question about a bug# in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems- ruby/+bug/145267/comments/42 . Could you help and file one? Otherwise Debian will have to wait. I'm kinda busy with a FeatureFreeze deadline and my real job. If I understand it correctly, you want to give Ubuntu a competitive advantage by not working with upstream to address this problem globally. That doesn't sound right. Yes I suppose you probably see it that way. I can't help you with that and I don't understand why you would want to adopt such a viewpoint. I'll let the rubygems commit logs, bug tracker and mailing list speak for whether I work with upstream or not. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/14 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was using the progressbar example from the rubygems documentation[1]: The command 'ruby test.rb' fails with a no such file to load - progressbar error message. I'm betraying my Rails heritage here and giving you duff instructions. On Ruby1.8 with a pure ruby application you always have to start a program with require 'rubygems' to get the 'require' monkey patching in place so you can use gem libraries. In ruby1.9 that is done automatically. (f you work in the Rails framework then Rails does that for you). So you don't need the symlinks and rubygem1.8 users wouldn't expect them to be there. Other comments on the diff between 1.2.0-2 and 1.2.0+2008081301-0ubuntu1~bbox1: * debian/control: You've modified the build-dependencies - you're depending on rdoc rather than an explicit version of it. I think keeping the dependencies as close as possible to the ones in debian would help. Isn't it a packaging bug? There is no need for a specific version so it should depend upon the default package. I understood that to be Ruby policy. ruby-pkg-tools has been dropped - why ? Not used. rubygems depends on rubygems1.8 *and* ruby. The dependency on ruby seems redundant. It does until you have a clean machine and do 'apt-get install rubygems' at which point you would have access to 'gem', but not 'ruby'. '/usr/bin/ruby' is controlled by the ruby package. If I've installed rubygems without a suffix I sort of expect to be able to use ruby without a suffix. Similarly if I've install rubygems1.8 I'd sort of expect ruby to be called ruby1.8 - hence why the dependency is here and not in the rubygems1.8 package. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 256821] Re: Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
2008/8/13 Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FTBFS in amd64 intrepid pbuilder. What have they changed now. Thanks Daniel. -- Neil Wilson -- Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/12 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How so ? In that the alternatives system will support and switch between another two sets of binary wrappers once we write the packages. Are these no longer required ? 08 exists. All the other patches have been superceded. I've put the details in the changelog. === You should merge the latest version of debian (-2) as your package is currently uninstallable on intrepid. Done. While testing the package I came across the usage of gem libraries: according to the rubygems documentation, you need to do some post-install work in order to setup ruby gems correctly. I was wondering if the ruby libraries could be symlinked to /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/RUBY_VERSION/ when a gem is installed ? That way you wouldn't have to modify your environment or call ruby with the -rubygems option. Since site_ruby is already versioned update-alternatives is not needed in that case. The rubygems documentation is somewhat out of date. The way you use libraries in a rubygem is simply to do require 'library' or if you want a particular version gem 'gemname', =2.1.0 require 'library' Rubygems monkey-patches the ruby require system so that you get the correct gem library automagically. It even works most of the time. Have you an example that doesn't work like that? I've also come across the following situation: $ sudo gem1.8 install rails $ sudo gem1.9 install rails $ sudo gem1.8 install rails However /usr/local/bin/rake is still using ruby1.9. So gems dependencies are not switched to the ruby version used by the installed gem. Is this a valid use case ? How should it be handled ? Could the slave option of update-alternatives be used to handle binaries from dependencies ? That's either a bug or a feature depending upon your viewpoint and is merely a function of the way gem does reinstalls and handles versioning (ie it reinstalls the requested gem, but not its dependencies). If you do that with a source installed gem system, you would get precisely the same result. For me its an edge case with no easy win (the list of binaries of all the dependencies is not readily available in the program). Gem's dependency mechanism is primitive and it does get itself in a mess if you do anything wildly unorthodox - like uninstall or reinstall things :-). For this cycle I'd be happy if gem puts its binaries on the system path and doesn't leave junk lying around or break things when uninstalling stuff. Do you consider this a show stopper? I'll get a new version of the package into the PPA just as soon as Intrepid lets me build one! -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256821] Re: Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
ubuntu1 micro patch attached, derived from upstreams VCS. Is that it, or do I need to do something else? ** Attachment added: Merge to correct FTBFS http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16748687/ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
New version with latest upstream fixes in https://edge.launchpad.net /~ubuntu-ruby/+archive -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256821] Re: Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
I'll forward to debian just as soon as I can get reportbug to talk to my smtp forwarder. -- Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Upstream update to 2.0.3. Updated version in REVU. Please comment. -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256821] [NEW] Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Public bug reported:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
affects ubuntu
status new
importance wishlist
subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors
Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Changelog since current intrepid version 0:
glusterfs (1.3.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
* first upload to Debian archive, thanks to the hard work of Leonardo
Rodrigues de Mello, Matthias Albert, Li Daobing and Neil Wilson,
closes: #419924
* extend init script with status function, remove boilerplate
do_reload function and fix whitespace typo
* remove mount patch which is included in upstream sources
* include copyright text in debian/copyright, include author list,
include more specific homepage
* switch from Ubuntu universe back to standard Debian sections
-- Christian Meder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 23 Jul 2008
08:01:21 +0200
glusterfs (1.3.10-0ubunut1) intrepid; urgency=low
* New Upstream Version
-- Neil Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:20:07 +0100
glusterfs (1.3.9-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
* public release (closes LP#246715)
* debian/rules: Add get-orig-source target
* debian/control: Alter section to point at universe
* debian/copyright: Update to GPL-3
* debian/watch: Add
* Patch server volume file so that it shares to localhost automatically.
* debian/glusterfs-server.init: Add a new init script that doesn't
hang on stop.
* debian/control: Split client and server packages out.
* debian/rules: Change sample configs to real ones. Remove --no-start
* debian/rules: Make alterations at install time
* debian/rules: Install daemon manpages in server.
* debian/glusterfs-server.manpages: Add
* Make separate README entries for client and server
* new upstream release 1.3.9.
-- Neil Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:47:15 +0100
glusterfs (1.3.8~pre5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream release 1.3.8pre5.
-- LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:20:23 +0800
glusterfs (1.3.8~pre4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream release 1.3.8pre4.
-- LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:54:01 +0800
glusterfs (1.3.8~pre3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream release 1.3.8pre3.
-- LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:19:21 +0800
glusterfs (1.3.8~pre2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream release 1.3.8pre2.
- debian/patches/01mount.glusterfs.patch: updated
- debian/rules: only glusterfs is left and moved to a new place, update
the help2man part.
* merge glusterfs-client and glusterfs-server to glusterfs, in this version,
glusterfsd is symlink to glusterfs:
- debian/control: updated
- debian/glusterfs-{client,server}.dirs - debian/glusterfs.dirs
- debian/glusterfs-{client,server}.install - debian/glusterfs.install
- debian/glusterfs.links: add manpage symlink
- debian/rules: updated
* debian/control: glusterfs-dbg depends on glusterfs.
* debian/control: improve glusterfs' short description.
* debian/control: build depends on libdb-dev.
-- LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:00:16 +0800
glusterfs (1.3.8~pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello ]
* New upstream release.
* Patched mount.glusterfs to detect multiple mounts
[ LI Daobing ]
* add me as uploader.
* debian/rules:
- fix init problems.
- strip debug/trace.so.
- install mount.glusterfs(8).
- manpage for glusterfs and glusterfsd should belong section 8.
* debian/control:
- fix package description.
- add homepage and vcs-* fields.
- don't build on -1-revision.
- add glusterfs-dbg.
* debian/mount.glusterfs.8: added.
-- LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:24:22 +0800
glusterfs (1.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Implement Changes proposed by Jeremy Laine
-- Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 2 Jan 2008
10:58:35 -0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIn+cajdO3epfQR6ERAmMNAKDN7X9Tb1FfONFiCskLxyMtbMVjOQCfbnSf
sL2vRsb/e1ZZ+RLInVWEjdk=
=UnnO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
--
Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246715] Re: glusterfs [needs packaging]
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 256821 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256821 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 256821 Please sync glusterfs 1.3.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). -- glusterfs [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/4 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, it's a patch that makes rubygems work better on systems with update-alternatives, while you should aim at a global solution instead. No I aim for the simplest solution that will solve the most pain in the shortest possible time. Others can then generalise that if they want. My time is paid for don't forget. From an Ubuntu point of view a superior package is good, because it gives people a reason why they should use Ubuntu and switch to the package rather than continue to mess around with the source package as they do now. Certainly I'm not going to get my 200 odd customers to move away from source installation without a nice fat carrot to offer them. I won't be the one making the final decision on this, but for this patch to be added to the package, I would either want: (a) that the patch is very, very small (b) or that the patch is going to be integrated upstream in the near future Technically this isn't a patch. It is using the upstream designed interface to allow an operating system to add aspects to operations. That makes it much more stable over time. I'm asking upstream for their view on the binary clash problem. It's only going to get worse as more interpreters come on line. But it ain't going to happen quickly (certainly not by Augst 28) and in the meantime you have unhappy users of Debian/Ubuntu who would be made happy by what we have here - today. What do you mean with default rubygems package? One like the package 'ruby' that installs the current 'system default' version. All I have is a rubygems package that depends upon rubygems1.8 and ruby so that I get the commands 'gem' and 'ruby' with the default 1.8 versions of each. The user gem mechanism is broken by the Debian packaging and that stops Rails 2.1 using it as it expects. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
** Changed in: libgems-ruby (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
New version in https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ruby/+archive This version uses alternatives in the background to handle the links in /usr/local/bin using the separate admin dirs suggested earlier (although I use /var/lib/gems/alternatives rather than /usr/local/lib/gems/alternatives to keep things in the right place). The user should never know that alternatives is operating the gem system. It should just work. - Last gem wins. The last gem installed will always be the one available. - Links are always cleaned up whatever order you install/uninstall things. - It's ready for the other ruby interpreters that are around the corner - Jruby and Rubinus. - If you use the gem '-V' verbose option then you can see what alternatives is doing. I've also implemented a rubygems package that follows the mechanisms used for the ruby package, ie it installs rubygems1.8. That means that other packages (eg passenger) can just depend upon the default version of gems as they can ruby. I think this is now the release candidate. Feedback please. -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Updated version in Revu -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
** Changed in: libgems-ruby (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/4 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Some notes in random order: The install / install / uninstall problem you mention is a gem problem. I think that it should be solved at the rubygem side, not specifically for Debian. That's over-engineered. Have you talked to the gems developers about that? Maybe you could implement a solution directly in rubygems. To do that would essentially require duplicating much of the alternatives system within rubygems. Feel free to code that up if you have a few weeks or months available. So I can have a 91 line fix in the packaging and hit Intrepid or several hundred within rubygems which nobody seems that keen on writing and get nowhere. The gem installation problem is fixed within Debian Policy, the system is kept clean of dangling links and broken Gems and from the user's perspective they just see a system that works. When rubygems finally get around to implementing something that stops gem1.8 and gem1.9 running into each other then we can delete the two small procedures that implement the system. It's just a patch, Lucas, to make Gems work better in a packaging environment. It will allow people to switch ruby interpreters with greater ease. With good packaging people can do that, and that will give them a reason to use the packages. Please check what has been done in Debian recently with the rubygems and ruby1.9 packages. How rubygems is managed changed a bit. See source packages: libgems-ruby = 1.2.0-1 and ruby1.9 = 1.9.0.1-5. (ie, the versions in intrepid, not hardy). If you looked at the package you'd notice that the code is based upon the latest Debian package in Intrepid (which is missing a default rubygems package BTW). Using the new 'operating_system.rb' override facility simplifies the package immensely by getting all the policy defaults in one place as well as allowing the user home area gems facility to work that is currently crippled by the Debian packaging. The user home area gem system is used by the 'gems:install' task within Rails 2.1 -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254382] [NEW] update-alternatives does not remove link when last alternative is removed if set to manual
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg Ubuntu: 8.10 dpkg: Installed: 1.14.20ubuntu4 /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --remove does not clear up the primary link if you remove the last item in an alternatives set if the alternatives set is set to manual mode. It does however clean up any slave links. This leaves untidy dangling symlinks lying around. The workaround at present is to set the alternative to auto mode prior to removal if 'update-alternatives --list group|wc -l' is equal to 1. If there is a reason for this behaviour it should be documented in the man page. ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - update-alternatives does not remove clean up link if set to manual + update-alternatives does not remove link when last alternative is removed if set to manual -- update-alternatives does not remove link when last alternative is removed if set to manual https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254374] [NEW] virtual console uses incorrect keyboard map
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virt-manager Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 virt-manager: Installed: 0.5.3-0ubuntu10 The virtual console for QEMU machines fails to recognise my UK keyboard, reverting to a slightly unusual variant of a US keyboard (# key generating a 3). dpkg-reconfigure console-setup appears to show the correct settings. However if I ssh into the machines via Gnome terminal then the keyboard map is fine. ** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- virtual console uses incorrect keyboard map https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254414] [NEW] QEMU virtual machine will not terminate on shutdown.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virt-manager Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1 Release:8.04 virt-manager: Installed: 0.5.3-0ubuntu10 Standard QEMU (not KVM) does not respond to shutdown button or menu item, nor does the instance terminate once the operating system has halted. You have to Destroy it from the console window. ** Affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- QEMU virtual machine will not terminate on shutdown. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/8/1 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm not sure I understand what you're referring to with 'packages' -
the rubygem package ?
The Debian/Ubuntu dpkg package.
What does the gem from source do ? Install in /usr/bin/ ? In
/var/lib/gems/ruby1.{8,9}/bin ? How does gem from source handle the
scenario you've outlined above ?
Source gem installs executable wrappers (essentially programmatic
symbolic links that select the correct gem executable) directly into
/usr/bin and stores gem libraries in the main ruby library area.
(/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8)
The way it deals with the version clash is that by default 'uninstall'
doesn't remove the executable wrapper.
That leads to the alternative bug of the program appearing to exist in
/usr/bin but but being unable to find the appropriate gem library
after you have done:
gem1.8 install
gem1.8 uninstall
So after a while your system ends up with a load of garbage wrappers
on the disk.
--
Neil Wilson
--
Add rubygems bin to PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
Linking to /usr/local/bin sounds appealling until you do the following rather reasonable sequence of events. Install 1.8 Gem Install 1.9 Gem Uninstall 1.8 Gem. Result is no link in /usr/local/bin and the user installing gem from source again 'cos those packages don't work properly'. The choice to install alternatives in /usr/local/bin is precisely so dpkg doesn't have to get involved in the alternatives process and the gem installed ones override the dpkg installed ones - as the user would expect. However that doesn't get away from the problem of dpkg packages failing to inform gem that they exist so that gem pulls (and compiles!) gems it doesn't really need. That discussion is probably a separate bug. By default gem always reinstalls even if the gem is up to date, so a simple 'last gem installed wins' solution using alternatives to deal with the /usr/local/bin clash issue is probably the simplest solution that will work. I will cut some code that implements this solution (including operating the separate gem alternatives system area) and we'll take it from there. -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Updated version in Revu. - Default vhost doc alias seems to work fine for me, as long as you remember to ask for http://localhost/doc/ (note trailing slash). Its the same with or without the module enabled. - Updated to use mpm-worker rather than prefork. -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
OK We now have code for a proposed fix for rubygems.
I've implemented an 'update-alternatives' system that creates a link to
gem binaries in /usr/local/bin. It arbitrates correctly between ruby1.8
and ruby1.9 gem installations.
At the moment the first gem installed wins, ie if you install capistrano
using gem1.8 and then with gem1.9, 'cap' will still call the ruby1.8
version. Please let me know if this behaviour is acceptable.
I've used the new 'operating_system.rb' override facilities in edge
Rubygems to create the mechanism. I've also taken the opportunity to fix
a few things I find annoying. Again I'd appreciate it if you could let
me know if this works for you.
* rdoc and ri documentation is *not* installed by default. You have to ask for
them.
* Executables are *always* removed on uninstall. I have no idea at all why
you'd want them to remain to create an error. If you know tell me.
* 'update -system' now calls 'apt-get install rubygems{version}' automatically.
Patches incorporated upstream have been removed, and new patches for new
problems added :-)
You can get the packages from the ubuntu-ruby group archive
(https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ruby/+archive). There are intrepid
packages and Hardy backports. (Be warned that the hardy backports will
pull in ruby1.8.7 and ruby1.9.0-2).
Code is on Github. http://github.com/NeilW/deb-rubygems/tree/master
Have a play. Let me know what you think. I'm off for a week's break now,
but I'll pick up comments when I get back.
--
Add rubygems bin to PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
On 12/07/2008, mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given the continuing intransigence of the debian maintainers, I've been wondering if it isn't time for a bunch of Ruby folk who use debian/Ubuntu to put together an alternative Ruby release as a single .deb that actually works properly. That work has already started mathew. I work at Brightbox, which you'll know as the UK Ruby on Rails host. We really need apt and gem to play nicely together for our next generation of Rails services. So I've kicked off the ~ubuntu-ruby and ~ubuntu-ruby-backports groups on Launchpad to try and drive work into improving the Ruby and Rails packaging systems (along with lots of other stuff to do with our virtualisation offering). There are packages in the PPAs there - mostly straight backports at present. I've already talked to Eric Hodel who looks after Rubygems and he has put installation hooks into edge Rubygems to allow us to call out pre- and post- install if we want. If there is community interest in helping us improve Rubygems (ie you're going to do some coding/testing/documenting, not just cheer on from the sidelines) then I'll upload the current work to github and we can take it from there. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190329] Re: DAC permissions not correctly enforced
The current version of the hardy kernel (2.6.24-19.34) still does not enforce the 'default permissions' mount option for fuse mounted filesystems. I'm using glusterfs which relies upon the 'default permissions' option to do file mode checking, and at the moment any user can write in any directory, remove and overwrite files owned by root and generally wreak havoc. All that is needed to fix the bug is to remove the word 'int' from fs/fuse/dir.c around line 906 in the kernel, as described in the patch above Any chance of getting that patch merged into the hardy kernel? ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Fix Committed = In Progress -- DAC permissions not correctly enforced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] [NEW] Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Public bug reported: Phusion Passenger™ — a.k.a. mod_rails or mod_rack — makes deployment of Ruby web applications, such as those built on the revolutionary Ruby on Rails web framework, a breeze. It follows the usual Ruby on Rails conventions, such as “Don’t-Repeat-Yourself”. * Deployment is only a matter of uploading application files. No Ruby (on Rails)-specific server configuration required! * Built on the industry standard Apache web server. * Zero maintenance. No port management, server process monitoring or stale file cleanup required. Errors are automatically recovered whenever possible. * Designed for performance, stability and security. Phusion Passenger should never crash Apache even in case of crashing Rails applications. * Well-documented, for both system administrators and developers! http://modrails.com Licensed under GPLv2 only. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246715] [NEW] glusterfs [needs packaging]
Public bug reported: GlusterFS is a cluster file-system capable of scaling to several peta- bytes. It aggregates various storage bricks over Infiniband RDMA or TCP/IP interconnect into one large parallel network file system. GlusterFS is based on a stackable user space design without compromising performance Homepage: http://glusterfs.org Licensed under GPLv3. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- glusterfs [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246715] Re: glusterfs [needs packaging]
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) Status: New = In Progress -- glusterfs [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246715] Re: glusterfs [needs packaging]
Package on REVU. http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=2755 -- glusterfs [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) Status: New = In Progress -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246719] Re: Phusion Passenger [needs packaging]
Uploaded to REVU http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=passenger -- Phusion Passenger [needs packaging] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231743] Re: dput has wrong url for REVU uploads
Confirmed - Hardy dput is still pointing at the old server. ** Changed in: dput (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- dput has wrong url for REVU uploads https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241657] Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in Ruby may lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition or allow execution of arbitrary code.
Note that the fix released causes segmentation faults in Rails applications. The p231 and p230 corrections are faulty. See comments in this thread http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/6/21/multiple-ruby-security- vulnerabilities There is a suggested fix there, however we really need a solution from ruby-core via Debian. -- Multiple vulnerabilities in Ruby may lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition or allow execution of arbitrary code. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241326] [NEW] Upgrade to vim-rails 0.4
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vim-rails Update of scripts to latest versions. ** Affects: vim-rails (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) Status: New ** Changed in: vim-rails (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) -- Upgrade to vim-rails 0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225466] Re: Please backport libgems-ruby from Intrepid
'Triaged' means tested in this process. It won't get done any faster if you don't follow the process https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#head- 5523e47badd3e3ea3f7aebebb0ebf23bfc76129f We are now in the hands of the backporting team, who are volunteers and busy guys. I find patience and the right level of lobbying on IRC tends to do the trick. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- Please backport libgems-ruby from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225466] Re: Please backport libgems-ruby from Intrepid
Good to go I feel. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- Please backport libgems-ruby from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152392] Re: [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video
@teledyn Have you tried 'dvgrab', which is the command line wrapper around the kino capture facility. That way you can easily use 'sudo dvgrab' and it will use the raw iee1394 device - including starting the playback automatically on the DV device. If this doesn't work then the problem is probably not with kino but with the underlying ieee1394 driver and you should raise a bug with that. The patch I've put forward just allows a normal user to use capture directly from the menu rather than having to do 'gksudo kino' in a terminal. -- [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152392] Re: [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video
** Changed in: kino (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) -- [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152392] Re: [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video
Attached is the debdiff which activates the dv1394 facility. kino (1.1.1-1ubuntu3) hardy; urgency=low * debian/rules: change without-dv1394 to with-dv1394 (closes #LP152392) -- [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152392] Re: [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video
** Attachment added: kino_1.1.1-1ubuntu3.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14892581/kino_1.1.1-1ubuntu3.debdiff ** Changed in: kino (Ubuntu) Assignee: Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) = (unassigned) -- [gutsy/hardy] Kino can't capture video https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228345] Re: gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency
2008/5/27 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd prefer if it went upstream, if applicable. I feel it is a packaging problem. Gem will not need altering. I've subscribed you to the bug and I'd appreciate your thoughts over there. I'm not sure you understand the rationale for splitting ruby1.9. So that other packages don't pull in stuff they don't need and reduce the perennial dependency problem. However those packages are a minority application. The majority want ruby1.x to include gems, to provide an executable called 'ruby', and supply all the subsiduary tools and they will be (and indeed are) confused if that isn't the case. It already exists, it's called ruby-full: Package: ruby-full [..] Depends: irb, libdbm-ruby, libgdbm-ruby, libopenssl-ruby, libreadline-ruby, rdoc, ri, ruby, ruby1.8-dev Recommends: libtcltk-ruby, ruby-elisp But currently, it pulls ruby1.8, since that's the default version, not ruby1.9. Yes, but that's the problem - one of marketing. Names matter. People expect ruby1.x to provide what they need to use ruby. They don't expect it to be just core ruby. If packagers need smaller packages then they should be the one handling the 'what is the package called' problem, not the poor end user who just wants to develop in ruby. For me ruby1.x should be user facing, pull in everything required to develop in ruby (including gems which is notably missing from your list above). We should have ruby1.x-core for those packagers who need the lighter less fattening alternative (with ruby1.x-core handling the 'alternatives' system properly and providing the 'ruby' symlink). The 'ruby' package needs to be a virtual that pulls the 'current' version, but is satisfied by all the other options (which will include jruby and rubinus before too long). So it is really just a package renaming issue, which is a bit of a pain in the backside, but it will improve the standing of Debian/Ubuntu ruby in the community enormously if it is done. And it sets us up to handle the various interpreter combinations going forward. -- Neil Wilson -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
Have you looked at the filesystem of an Ubuntu Hardy machine recently? You might want to take a look. 2008/5/28 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: See #18808 about /etc/profile.d/ ... -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228345] Re: gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency
2008/5/28 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: But there's some real data: popcon. 264545 Ubuntu users have libruby1.8 installed (ie about 50% of all ubuntu users, since the most installed packages have 574294). And 9007 users (1.5% of all Ubuntu users, 3.4% of users having libruby1.8 installed) have libgems-ruby1.8 installed. Not very sound statistics. That's just package installs, and no differentiation between automatic and manual. Ubuntu main contains the ruby-core libraries and installs them by default now. So it hardly surprising to see the core installed by the packaging system to run the ruby scripts contained therein. That is what it is supposed to do. It could be called anything and it wouldn't affect those numbers one little bit. Look at the Rails package. Less than 500 people use Rails according to those statistics. Hardly realistic is it given that the Ruby market is dominated by Rails. There is a reason that gems is in Ruby for 1.9. There is a reason there are 3000 gems in the database and growing. I'm pretty sure it isn't just to spite the Debian Ruby group. -- Neil Wilson -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
Now you're getting desperate. All packages depend upon the setting of PATH to work at all. You can hardly leave it blank can you. The alternative is to alter the package to allow gems to write the binaries to /usr/bin where they belong. Which policy would you prefer to change? 2008/5/28 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 28/05/08 at 12:42 -, Neil Wilson wrote: Have you looked at the filesystem of an Ubuntu Hardy machine recently? You might want to take a look. base-files (4.0.1ubuntu2) hardy; urgency=low * Implement LSB-3.1, 16.2 (/etc/profile.d). Addresses LP #102105. According to Debian policy 9.9 (Environment variables), programs installed by packages must not depend on environment variables to get reasonable defaults. Do not use this LSB feature to set or modify environment variables. -- Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:27:17 +0100 -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/5/28 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Installing to /usr/local/bin could sound acceptable to me. Not sure if that will be acceptable for the other ruby maintainers in Debian. Could this be solved with the alternatives system I wonder. The gem installations are after all alternatives to apt packages. That way it would work with gem1.9 as well. Apt packages could override with a higher priority. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
2008/5/28 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, but I'm getting annoyed by your tone in this whole discussion. I Well I'm sorry that you feel that way. I'm not here to upset anybody. I'm here to get a problem that has been annoying me and probably about 9000 others for the last two to three years fixed once and for all. However from where I'm sat, and the others who have diligently reported this fault time and time again, there appears to be an impasse that makes no sense to us. And that is what is making me tetchy because I can see no need for it. Let's make gem and apt play nicely together and everybody wins. Particularly you Lucas because I've read the public background and I know you've put your heart into it. I'm sure you want it fixed as much as I do. So if you want to say 'no' to something, great, but please offer an alternative so we can make progress towards a proposal that works for everybody. Now what do you think about using the alternatives system? -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
OK. So patch to gem1.8 to call update-alternatives with a lowish priority whenever it fiddles with '/var/lib/gems/1.8/bin'. Similarly to gem1.9. Now what about the corresponding apt-package. Let's say we have 'mongrel' installed via gems with the alternatives system pointing /usr/bin/mongrel_rails to the gem version. Then we install the apt package and there is a name clash. If something has been packaged that is also a ruby gem how do we do the naming for the binaries? 2008/5/28 Rocco Stanzione [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Now that's not a bad idea. I hadn't thought of using the alternatives system. -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
On 28/05/2008, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would require hacking rubygems quite deeply. If rubygems provided some hooks that we could use to implement distro-specific stuff, why not. But it's not the case, AFAIK. Not really. It's a relatively straightforward program to follow and Eric is quite helpful really. I don't perceive a big issue in getting gem to issue the appropriate 'update-alternatives' command. To be honest it could probably do with a pre/post hook system. What is the problem with installing to /usr/local/bin? It's in the default system path, and it's before /usr/bin and /bin. That's one problem. gem installed systems would then override apt installed systems and I'm not sure that is where we want to go. That way it would work with gem1.9 as well. Apt packages could override with a higher priority. If we install to /usr/local/bin, and you gem1.9 update --system, you will get a new gem executable in /usr/local/bin, that will override (by precedence in the path) Debian's. You mean 'gem1.9 update' (gem1.9 update --system updates rubygems and should be disabled) Do we want that? If you install an apt package shouldn't that be the one the system uses (from a stability point of view). The problem I see is when gem1.8 and gem1.9 are on the same system. If you install a gem in 1.8, then install it in 1.9 a remove in 1.8 will remove the 1.9 binary in /usr/local/bin -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 145267] Re: Add rubygems bin to PATH
On 28/05/2008, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For each Debian package where a gem also exists, you would have to modify the Debian package to use the alternatives system. That clearly doesn't work. Why not? Surely that should be part of the packaging wrapper for a package that is also a rubygem and which generates executables. (which would include putting the appropriate data files in the gem data area to tell gem that the facility is installed so that gem dependencies work correctly). It's all about making the debian packages co-operate with gem. They can co-operate through the alternatives system and avoid standing on each others toes. I would think that apt packages generated would be those where gem normally compiles (like mongrel). In which case there is a dependency on the ruby version and the binary should really be called 'mongrel_rails1.8' anyway. I would suggest that gem installs its binaries in /var/lib/gems/1.x/bin. Packaging creates packages for each version of ruby (eg. mongrel1.8, mongrel1.9), installs the binaries as /usr/bin/whatever1.x and alternatives is used to create /usr/bin/whatever -- Neil Wilson -- Add rubygems bin to PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145267 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228345] Re: gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency
I think it would be better if Ubuntu started packaging Ruby in the way that people who use it actually require. Explain to a real user why they need to do 'apt-get install gem' rather than 'apt-get install ruby' to be able to use Ruby properly. They look at you daft and go off and use CentOs or Gentoo instead where you can install ruby 1.9 and gem just works. This if you don't like it you can lump it attitude is not at all helpful to those who need to use the distribution to get real things done. - The Ubuntu packages need to support the gem database. For example, currently apt Mongrel does not tell gem that it is installed which stops the mongrel cluster gem installing properly. That requires me to use a compiler in the real world and is a clear example of the failure of the current Debian Ruby binary packaging mechanisms. Apt must keep the gem database up to date if it is a package that has come from Gem so that Gem doesn't get confused and the gem dependencies work for gem packages not in the apt database. - We need a better way of packaging gems with apt - preferably automatically in the majority of cases. That means getting away for the esoteric CDBS Makefile system and embracing Rake which somebody constructing gems can understand and include in their system. Gem is merely a source packaging system like tar with a relatively primitive binary generation system. Apt is so much more powerful. Yet there are 2500 gems and next to no apt packages. That demonstrates the failure of the current packaging model. - The notion that when a system adminstrator installs Gems they *don't* want the binaries on the system path is silly. Packaging is about automation and I'm sick to death of having to do manual alterations to the system path just because of somebody's incorrect idea of how the world is. If gems is installed then the bin needs to go on the system path (at the end - after /usr/games) automatically. On 24/05/2008, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feel free to install ruby from sources if you don't like the way it's packaged in Debian/Ubuntu. So you get the same amount of support for ruby and third party libs you install through gems. No, I think it is time that the packaging system changed to support real users doing real Ruby in the real world. There are plenty of instances where Ubuntu has altered its policy compared to Debian. It is preferable that the two are aligned but where there is a clear problem with the solution offered by Debian then Ubuntu has the option of going in a different direction. That is probably where this is going if a solution can't be worked out. At the end of the day code talks. Nobody in Ruby (which is mostly Rails these days) is seriously using the apt packages currently constructed because they are not fit for purpose. Rails is just completely wrong, Mongrel is deficient as pointed out above, there is no ferret package. I can just about use the database libraries until I need a gem that depends on them - then it all goes pear shaped. Not good enough when your business depends upon it. (Btw, interesting post on this topic: http://www.madstop.com/ruby/ruby_has_a_distribution_problem.html ) That's the usual technique of a clique grasping at information that appear to support their position despite the overwhelming tide of evidence against them. That evidence is Ruby people avoiding Debian and Ubuntu and picking other distributions because their Ruby support is superior, or installing compilers on their servers and using gem because it is just so much easier. What that article is really saying is that we need pragmatic integration between apt and gem now. And that means realising Gem is a *source* repository that just happens to have a simple cross platform binary creator and a dependency system. It has advantages over apt in some cases (allowing multiple versions of Rails on a single system for example), but it useless in other regards (no postinst scripting, appalling native code support and a disregard for FHS). The systems need to work together efficiently and I've got some reasonable well formed thoughts about how that should happened and I know that you're doing something similar because I've been reviewing what you've said in public. So if you're interested in thrashing out a solution we can all work with Lucas, then I'm all ears. Drop me a note offline. -- Neil Wilson -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234222] [NEW] [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100
Public bug reported: Lenonvo 3000 N100 laptop. After upgrade to hardy from gutsy, the system does not remember the last brightness setting used. I get this on startup, when logging off and back on again and bizarrely when firing up a new Virtual Machine using VirtualBoxOSE. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234222] Re: [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100
** Attachment added: DMESG http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14669546/dmesg.txt -- [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234222] Re: [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100
** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14669548/lspci.txt -- [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234262] [NEW] pbuilder ignores --buildresult
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pbuilder pbuilder: Installed: 0.176ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.176ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.176ubuntu2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Running sudo pbuilder --build mypackage.dsc --buildresult /tmp builds the package in the default location of /var/cache/pbuilder/result instead. ** Affects: pbuilder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pbuilder ignores --buildresult https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228345] Re: Ubuntu (new upstream) ruby1.9 1.9.0.1-1ubuntu1
The gem command *is* a completely integral part of ruby1.9. Removing it is like removing the standard library or the interpreter itself. There is a great need to start treating gem with the respect that ruby developers expect, rather than this continuing attempt to treat it as some sort of side issue. It's like trying to hold back the tide and is already causing massive problems in using both Debian and Ubuntu as a basis for any sort of Ruby operation. It's deeply frustrating. Every serious ruby developer has gem installed. Every serious ruby program going forward will use gems. I see no value at all in splitting it out. 2008/5/16 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 16/05/08 at 12:36 -, Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic wrote: Changes: ruby1.9 (1.9.0.1-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low . * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: - Robustify check for target_os, fixing build failure on lpia. OK, will merge that one in the Debian package. * debian/control: - ruby1.9 pkg: moved rdoc1.9 suggestion to depends. (LP: #228345) That's wrong. The right solution is to make gem1.9 not part of ruby1.9. The consequence of your change is that every user of an app written in ruby (1.9) now installs an additional and useless (for them) 1MB package. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Neil Wilson -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228345] [NEW] gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 8.04 ruby1.9: Installed: 1.9.0.0-2ubuntu1 Running command 'gem1.9 help commands' generates a require error. /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/server.rb:2:in `require': no such file to load -- rdoc/template (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/server.rb:2:in `top (required)' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/commands/server_command.rb:2:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/commands/server_command.rb:2:in `top (required)' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:138:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:138:in `rescue in load_and_instantiate' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:130:in `load_and_instantiate' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:64:in `[]' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/commands/help_command.rb:121:in `block in execute' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/commands/help_command.rb:120:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/commands/help_command.rb:120:in `execute' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command.rb:136:in `invoke' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in `process_args' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/command_manager.rb:74:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run' from /usr/bin/gem1.9:22:in `main' ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gem1.9 - require 'rdoc/template' fails - missing dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226410] [NEW] Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy
Public bug reported: I have a WPA personal wireless network which worked fine with Gutsy - reconnected at logon and generally didn't cause any problems at all. Since upgrading to Hardy though I struggle to get the network to connect and get random drops for no good reason. I can't quite work out from the traces whether it is network manager that is getting confused about what is coming from the kernel driver, or the kernel driver that isn't doing what it is supposed to. There seems to be a lot of 'moved out of area' and 'transmitted before authenticated' messages flying around. Whatever it is, it ain't robust like it used to be, so from my point of view it is definitely a regression. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: regression ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = network-manager ** Tags added: regression -- Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226414] [NEW] Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager If I boot my laptop with wireless off (via the kill switch) and then reactivate wireless after logging into the system then the network gets stuck in a loop constantly popping up the 'Wireless network key required' dialog - even though there is one in the keyring. I'm not sure whether this is network manager getting confused about what is coming out of the kernel driver, or the kernel driver that is getting confused about what is happening on the network. Certainly there seems to be a lot of 'out of range' and 'transmitting before authenticated' messages flying around. The system worked fine under Gutsy with the same AP and I can get the network to reconnect if I force the thing manually. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226410] Re: Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy
uname -a Linux neil-laptop 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux modinfo iwl3945 filename: /lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/ubuntu/wireless/iwlwifi/iwlwifi/compatible/iwl3945.ko license:GPL author: Copyright(c) 2003-2007 Intel Corporation version:1.2.0 description:Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG Network Connection driver for Linux srcversion: 8E95C617988943846696F97 alias: pci:v8086d4227sv*sd*bc*sc*i* alias: pci:v8086d4222sv*sd*bc*sc*i* depends:iwlwifi_mac80211 vermagic: 2.6.24-16-generic SMP mod_unload parm: antenna:select antenna (1=Main, 2=Aux, default 0 [both]) (int) parm: disable:manually disable the radio (default 0 [radio on]) (int) parm: hwcrypto:using hardware crypto engine (default 0 [software]) (int) parm: debug:debug output mask (int) parm: disable_hw_scan:disable hardware scanning (default 0) (int) parm: queues_num:number of hw queues. (int) parm: qos_enable:enable all QoS functionality (int) -- Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193075] Re: [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0
** Tags added: regression -- [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226410] Re: Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy
This is a trace when the network activated and then dropped seconds later. ** Attachment added: attached_and_dropped.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14192189/attached_and_dropped.txt -- Intel 3945: struggling to connect to AP that worked fine in Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193075] Re: [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0
Confirmed on upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy on Samssung ML-1610. Doesn't work 'out of the box' on upgrade 'raster2spl2' fails with error code 1. Workaround is to go into the printer configuration and reselect the make and model. The dialog will then give you the option to overwrite the PPD with the new one. -- [hardy] upgrade issue Splix V. 1.1.0 but the PPD file is designed for SpliX V. 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226414] Re: Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on
uname -a Linux neil-laptop 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux modinfo iwl3945 filename: /lib/modules/2.6.24-16-generic/ubuntu/wireless/iwlwifi/iwlwifi/compatible/iwl3945.ko license:GPL author: Copyright(c) 2003-2007 Intel Corporation version:1.2.0 description:Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG Network Connection driver for Linux srcversion: 8E95C617988943846696F97 alias: pci:v8086d4227sv*sd*bc*sc*i* alias: pci:v8086d4222sv*sd*bc*sc*i* depends:iwlwifi_mac80211 vermagic: 2.6.24-16-generic SMP mod_unload parm: antenna:select antenna (1=Main, 2=Aux, default 0 [both]) (int) parm: disable:manually disable the radio (default 0 [radio on]) (int) parm: hwcrypto:using hardware crypto engine (default 0 [software]) (int) parm: debug:debug output mask (int) parm: disable_hw_scan:disable hardware scanning (default 0) (int) parm: queues_num:number of hw queues. (int) parm: qos_enable:enable all QoS functionality (int) -- Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226414] Re: Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on
syslog trace of events during a loop ** Attachment added: activation_loop.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14192202/activation_loop.txt -- Intel 3945: authentication loop when wireless switched on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220366] [NEW] usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 RC. Fails to show usplash screen on startup or shutdown. Worked fine with the live cd. Resolution is 1280x1024. Gnome runs fine. Workaround is to change resolution in /etc/usplash.conf to 1024x768 and run 'sudo update-initramfs -u' ATI Radeon video card. ** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220366] Re: usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode
** Attachment added: Usplash settings http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13700073/usplash.conf -- usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220366] Re: usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode
Linux neil-desktop 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13700495/lspci-vvnn.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: usplash Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 RC. Fails to show usplash screen on startup or shutdown. Worked fine with the live cd. Resolution is 1280x1024. Gnome runs fine. + + Workaround is to change resolution in /etc/usplash.conf to 1024x768 and run + 'sudo update-initramfs -u' ** Description changed: Binary package hint: usplash Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 RC. Fails to show usplash screen on startup or shutdown. Worked fine with the live cd. Resolution is 1280x1024. Gnome runs fine. Workaround is to change resolution in /etc/usplash.conf to 1024x768 and run 'sudo update-initramfs -u' + + ATI Radeon video card. -- usplash 1280x1024 picking unsupported video mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216784] [NEW] VirtualBox - Can't install hardy server as guest - inappropriate kernel error
Public bug reported: Trying to install Hardy 8.04 Beta Server i386 as a guest into a Gutsy 7.10 Host VirtualBox system Package is 1.5.0-dfsg2-1ubuntu3 On reboot the kernel reports: This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: 0:6 Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU. Think that is something to do with PAE. Whatever it is it is confusing the Gutsy emulator! ** Affects: virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- VirtualBox - Can't install hardy server as guest - inappropriate kernel error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 132252] Re: Mounting EISA partitions on install
Last time I did an install it was. Obviously I don't rebuild my laptop from scratch every day. On 12/7/07, Brian Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for you? Thanks in advance. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Murray (brian-murray) Status: New = Incomplete -- Mounting EISA partitions on install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132252 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Mounting EISA partitions on install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 97720] Re: Internet Radio Audio Freezes in Rythmbox Music Player
Reassgining it to gstreamer might help. Because it most definitely is a gstreamer fault. On 11/6/07, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe people could try to send this issue upstream or to work on it rather than discussing the bug settings for ages which is not going to make it work correctly -- Internet Radio Audio Freezes in Rythmbox Music Player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97720 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: rhythmbox = gstreamer0.10 -- Internet Radio Audio Freezes in Rythmbox Music Player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
** Attachment added: Glibc linked list error report http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10259800/glibcreport -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
Interesting. It is a fresh installation of Gutsy 7.10 on a Lenovo laptop. What I get is a corrupt double linked list error on the Human Theme. On 11/3/07, Koen Beek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Koen Beek (koen-beek) Status: New = Incomplete -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
** Attachment added: STDERR / STDOUT capture http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10259804/stderr-stdout -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
Version is openoffice.org-core 1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5 -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
Document works fine on my other machine, but that is an upgrade from Feisty rather than a fresh Gutsy install. Different hardware though. ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97720] Re: Internet Radio Audio Freezes in Rythmbox Music Player
I get the same freeze with totem as I do with Rhythmbox. As soon as the name of the track changes, everything stops. -- Internet Radio Audio Freezes in Rythmbox Music Player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
Different architecture as well. The crash happens on AMD64. It works fine on i386. -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] OO Word processor crashes with this document
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Complete crash when opening the attached Word document ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159681] Re: OO Word processor crashes with this document
** Attachment added: file40470.doc http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10257035/file40470.doc -- OO Word processor crashes with this document https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140924] Re: hdd 'ticks' every 5 seconds
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 59695 default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17216 Hard drive spindown should be configurable -- hdd 'ticks' every 5 seconds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137420] Re: hard disk power management after resume
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 59695 default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17216 Hard drive spindown should be configurable -- hard disk power management after resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137420 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104535] Re: Default HD power management settings will kill drive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 59695 default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17216 Hard drive spindown should be configurable -- Default HD power management settings will kill drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92288] Re: [Gutsy] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 59695 default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17216 Hard drive spindown should be configurable -- [Gutsy] [Feisty] [Edgy] Ubuntu may eat Hard Drives due to overly-aggressive APM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17216 Hard drive spindown should be configurable -- default value in power.sh potentially kills laptop disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 17216] Re: Hard drive spindown should be configurable
As far as I can tell by default Ubuntu does nothing to alter the hard drives default power management setting during the boot up phase. So you get the default set by the BIOS or the hard drive manufacturer. This will cause failures because some disks default to a setting of 128, and that means they wear out by constantly parking their heads. There are a load of bugs popping up on launchpad about this problem. I'm going to duplicate them to this one and make this master. -- Hard drive spindown should be configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 17216] Re: Hard drive spindown should be configurable
Looking at the hdparm entries in power.sh, I can't see how they can be executed anyway even if laptop mode is on. The /sys filespec in the for loop doesn't appear to correspond to the current layout of the filesystem (at least on my Gutsy installation here). Therefore all control must come from laptop-mode.conf if laptop mode is switched on. Is a quick workaround for this problem to set some sensible HD spin down and power management parameters in laptop-mode.conf and tell people to switch laptop-mode on if they are having disk problems? -- Hard drive spindown should be configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
No. I think I'm running 'noapic' on boot, or I upgraded the BIOS to fix the problem. On 10/29/07, sybille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you happen to see the APIC errors in your syslog, too? -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64
Rather than deleting or renaming modules, why not do it properly. add blacklist sis_agp to the bottom of /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist The problem is caused by the amd64_agp and sis_agp drivers running into each other. -- sis 760 AGP broken on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131873] Re: exe segfault in kernel log
Problem is fixed in the Gutsy release. The dmesg log is pretty clean on this laptop now. The Gutsy cycle has nailed the problems. Good work all round. Thanks a lot. Happy to close this one. On 10/24/07, Leann Ogasawara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil, now that the 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon release of Ubuntu is out, we were wondering if you can still reproduce this issue. Could you please download and try the new version of Ubuntu from http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download and report back your results. If the issue is still present in the new release, please attach the following information: * uname -a uname-a.log * cat /proc/version_signature version.log * dmesg dmesg.log * sudo lspci -vvnn lspci-vvnn.log Please be sure to attach each file as a separate attachment. Can you also comment on the last known kernel that this didn't happen? For more information regarding the kernel team bug policy, please refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies . Thanks again and we appreciate your help and feedback. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Incomplete -- exe segfault in kernel log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131873 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- exe segfault in kernel log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] Re: internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
** Attachment added: Log when segment changes and restart attempted. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10065791/rhythmbox-log.txt ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] Re: internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
Seems to be do with a segment change on the radio station. You get a hang as soon as the track name changes in the Title Bar or tooltip. -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] Re: internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
** Attachment added: Errors when clicking the 'play' icon on the radio link after a failure. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10053379/fred -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] Re: internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
** Attachment added: Errors when restarting by double clicking the radio link http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10053368/fred -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Select one of the default radio stations from the list. I'm using Virgin Classic Rock. When the broadband or wireless experiences congestion, Rhythmbox rebuffers a couple of times and the music then stops. Assuming Rhythmbox doesn't crash at this point, if you try and play the stream again you get an internal data flow error. Running Rhythmbox from the command line gives you the attached output during the failure ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153631] Re: internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox
** Description changed: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Select one of the default radio stations from the list. I'm using Virgin Classic Rock. - When the broadband or wireless experiences congestion, Rhythmbox - rebuffers a couple of times and the music then stops. + When the station notifies a change of tune, Rhythmbox rebuffers a couple + of times and the music then stops. Assuming Rhythmbox doesn't crash at this point, if you try and play the stream again you get an internal data flow error. Running Rhythmbox from the command line gives you the attached output during the failure -- internal data flow error with Radio in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151204] Re: [gutsy] no sound (intel), no network(ipw3945) on 2.6.22-14
** Also affects: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [gutsy] no sound (intel), no network(ipw3945) on 2.6.22-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151204] Re: [gutsy] no sound (intel), no network(ipw3945) on 2.6.22-14
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- [gutsy] no sound (intel), no network(ipw3945) on 2.6.22-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
