[Bug 1835141] Re: /usr/lib/ibus-mozc/ibus-engine-mozc:6:__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler:__cxxabiv1::__terminate:std::terminate:__cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw:std::__throw_logic_error
Hi, > @Nobuhiro: Is the existence of such crashes something you are aware of? I can not see 'https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/b0745b3823bfaed66f7c5601ac0b576e8f1508fd'. But there is no this problem in my environment. > Is it possibly a reason to look at a newer upstream version? The current version is the same as Upstreram. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835141 Title: /usr/lib/ibus-mozc/ibus-engine- mozc:6:__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler:__cxxabiv1::__terminate:std::terminate:__cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw:std::__throw_logic_error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/1835141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101049] Re: non-free algorithms (e.g. SIFT) excluded
Hi, Debian package was removed source code of non-free module. Because there is a patent issue. If you're distributing in Ubuntu, I think should you contact the Canonical is good first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101049 Title: non-free algorithms (e.g. SIFT) excluded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/+bug/1101049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1037876] Re: Mozc needs a meta-data addition to make "Preferences" in ibus-setup usable
Hi, I just uploaded version 1.6.1187.102 (r130) to experimental. Nobuto, Can you upload (sync?, I dont know) this version to Ubuntu? Because Debian is forzen now, I dont upload to new version to unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037876 Title: Mozc needs a meta-data addition to make "Preferences" in ibus-setup usable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/1037876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 989365] Re: opencv pkgconfig file has the wrong include dir
This is alredy fixed in -11. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989365 Title: opencv pkgconfig file has the wrong include dir To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/+bug/989365/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994114] Re: Missing link to libopencv_gpu.so.2.3
Because libcv-dev does not depend libopencv-gpu-dev. You need to install this. This is NOT a bug. Please see README.Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994114 Title: Missing link to libopencv_gpu.so.2.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/+bug/994114/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017056] Re: "debuild clean" doesn't remove chrome/skk/*.mk
Fix in mozc version 1.5.1090.102-2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017056 Title: "debuild clean" doesn't remove chrome/skk/*.mk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/1017056/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930296] Re: guvcview crashes when trying to record a video
In debian, this bug is fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930296 Title: guvcview crashes when trying to record a video To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/guvcview/+bug/930296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 902828] Re: libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed.
This problem occurs in new uim-mozc, because new scm file does not supports in old uim. This problem was had in debain backports only. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902828 Title: libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/902828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 902828] Re: libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed.
** Description changed: During installing uim-mozc, Module mozc is judged as not a correct module and not listed in uim settings. == - Setting up uim-mozc (1.2.855.102+main-1) ... - libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed. - Warning: Module mozc is not a correct module. + Setting up uim-mozc (1.2.855.102+main-1) ... + libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed. + Warning: Module mozc is not a correct module. == uim-mozc | 1.2.855.102+main-1 | precise/universe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902828 Title: libuim: [fatal] mozc plugin: Subsequent /usr/share/uim/mozc.scm load failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/902828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791234] Re: xflr5 version 6.04-1 failed to build on armel
This bug already fixed in Debian. And this problem is a problem of qt. Please see http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/q/qt4-x11/qt4-x11_4.7.3-5/changelog. ** Changed in: xflr5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791234 Title: xflr5 version 6.04-1 failed to build on armel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xflr5/+bug/791234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816076] Re: oneiric times out after 2nd scan
Hi, this is kernel issue and already fixed in upstream kernel (3.1-rc8) Please see http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=131629120106056&w=2 Nobuhiro -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816076 Title: oneiric times out after 2nd scan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/816076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi, Sorry, answer is too late... 2011/8/31 Matthieu Baerts : > Hello and sorry for this late answer... > >> What do you mean that Debian is refusing to apply patches from > upstream? What are these patches? Are there bugs about them in Debian's > bug tracker, and why doesn't upstream just release a new tarball? Unless > you really mean that upstream prefers a certain packaging layout which > is not something that upstream needs to worry about. > > We (the developers of Cairo-Dock) don't like our Debian packages for a few > reasons: > * About Cairo-Dock (core): > - Their patches are strange...They change the version number! Maybe there is > a good reason but they do that without posting any message here or on our > forum. This is a bit annoying because that's change the name of our soname, > of our themes, of all .conf files and it's also a problem when we have to > debug something or if we add some restriction about the version (about our > plug-ins). This was a change for package checks of Debian (lintian). > - They change our default theme. I can understand that they replace firefox by iceweasel but now, if firefox is not available it will use iceweasel. But I don't understand why they change the terminal application... They can propose to us to change something, it's not a problem but they force this modification We have not forced it on you about this. This is a correction to have only in Debian. > - cairo-dock-core and cairo-dock-data have been merged, but why? Is it not a recommendation to split this kind of packages like that? Hmm? We have not provided cairo-dock-data package. We will change it like that if you want to divide it as cairo-dock-data package. > * About Cairo-Dock Plug-Ins: > - They have changed the name of the package (cairo-dock-plug-ins -> > cairo-dock-plugins). Ok, it's the official name (set in the CMakeLists.txt > file but not on Launchpad and BZR) but this package has been uploaded on > Ubuntu before to be uploaded on Debian and this package has been proposed on > Debian with the same name. The up stream was cairo-dock-plugins. We only just use it. If you need , I will change. > - The version has been changed too but it's a problem if there is a modification in the API because the dock checks if we use the same version (core and plug-ins) I recommend that you change major and minor of soname if API is added, and movement changes. I cannot change these. > - They have split each plugin in one package per plugin but it's not a good idea for a few things (see above) (e.g. it's harder to maintain it: the name can change, one plugin can be required by another, our themes can be modified, our new plug-ins are often missing, etc.) Because there is a user doing various how to use in Debian, I do packaging so that many users are easy to use it. I explain this by a former email. > - A few files are missing (e.g. for our DBus plugin) Please bug report. > - Our 'integration' plug-ins do not required of any dependences (we do not have to use shlibs for them) because they are used only if a library is available (e.g. our XFCE plug-in is activated only if thunar and gvfs is available but you don't need to install thunar and all other XFCE lib if you're using LXDE... a lot of useless dependences (more than 30Mo I think) are installed and it's a bit ridiculous (bug already reported two years ago I think) Sorry, where did you report this bug? At least I was not able to find it in Debian. > - Our unstable plug-ins are compiled and installed, why? And our new > plug-ins are not available... > (...) > I've proposed a new version of these two packages on mentors.debian.net (see > above) but these modifications have been rejected (not all of them, thank you > for these modifications but it's not enough...). I've also proposed to > maintain these packages but without any success (yes, I'm an Ubuntu user so I > guess I'm not able to do that... even if I'm a former Debian user.? :) but it > will be so easier...) > Few month ago, I meet you in the cairo-dock packaging team. If there is the place that you want to change, please argue in a mailing list with other members. > Also I want to note that these plug-ins packages have been included > first in Ubuntu (I don't know why but our previous maintainer wanted to > do that...) and then in Debian but the Debian maintainers have change > the name and all the content of the debian directory :-/ > > >> Please stop pushing to this duplicate source package and have the Debian >> named package provide the same named transitional packages so that upgraders >> will get the correctly named packages. > > Do I have to rename the source packa
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
This problem is the problem that do not divide or devide a package.
This problem terminated once because Debian maintainer provided
cairo-dock-clock-plugin.
However, the same problem open again.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540648
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2011/7/13 Matthieu Baerts :
> @Micah Gersten, @Brian Murray, @Matthias Klose: I really want to fix
> this bug but it seems that Debian maintainers of Cairo-Dock packages do
> not want to apply patches from the upstream (in fact, the upstream wants
> that the Debian maintainers use current Ubuntu Cairo-Dock's packages.).
> So what can we do?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
>
> Title:
> Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo-dock-plug-ins/+bug/657564/+subscriptions
>
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
Title:
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo-dock-plug-ins/+bug/657564/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts :
> Yes we understand why you do that (we guess that it's not only for the
> fun ;) ) but if it's harder for the user too, I think it's not a good
> solution.
Yes, I do not think that it is easy for all users to choose a package.
I think that the one where user can install all plugin is simple in the user
who does not understand what user should have chosen.
And the provides of this function is performed in cairo-dock-plug-ins.
However, all users may not be so.
the user read description of the packages well, and who can understand
which plugin is included in which package installs a package by
oneself and will delete it.
The method that you suggest can support only the former.
With the present package, I come by both support.
Which intends for all users whether it is a good thing?
>
> As said Fabounet, we use the same architecture as many programs like
> Compiz but on Compiz there are not a package for each plugin.
>
Compiz does not depend on the CPU architecture.
I depend on the hardware which a CPU working.
Please BTS when Compiz is the architecture except IA32 and amd64, and
there is a problem.
I seem to work in most architecture now at least.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=compiz
# Of course I think that there are many problems.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
Title:
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts :
> 2011/2/21 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Package: cairo-dock-plug-ins
>> Section: graphics
>> Architecture: any
>> Conflicts: cairo-dock-plug-ins (<= 2.0.8.0)
>> Replaces: cairo-dock-plugin-data,
>> cairo-dock-plugins,
>> cairo-dock-alsamixer-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-animated-icons-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-cairo-penguin-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-clipper-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-clock-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-compiz-icon-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-dbus-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-desklet-rendering-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-dialog-rendering-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-drop-indicator-plugin,
>> cairo-dock-dustbin-plugin,
>>
>>
>> NAK.
>> Most users do not need all plugin.
>> We should leave the choice that user can install only necessary plugin.
>> cairo-dock-plug-ins is a meta package of that purpose.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Nobuhiro
>> --
>> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>> iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
>> GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
>>
>
>
> Yes we (the upstream) know but there is a lot of reasons to not split these
> plug-ins:
> * It's hard to maintain these deb packages (some plugins are available on
> Ubuntu and not on Debian, some plugins are unstable, some plugins require
> some other, some plugins can become unstable or the name can change, or some
> plugins can merged, etc.)
Yes, Maintenance of the packages is very hard work.
But we do not maintian package for oneself.
It is necessary we think about the thing of the user, and to make a package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
Title:
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts :
> Hello Nobuhiro,
>
> My account name is "matttbe" (matttbe-guest)
> => https://alioth.debian.org/users/matttbe-guest/
>
I already appied your accout.
Welcome!
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
Title:
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi, 2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts : > Hello, > > @Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: I've uploaded new packages on mentors.debian.net > I've tested these packages by building them with pbuilder (sid distribution) > and by installing them on a fresh install of Debian Sid (today updated) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564 Title: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi, We are maintaining cario-dock package on alioth. If you dont have accout of alioth, please create accout. And teach me your accout. I will add you cairo-dock maintain team. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts : > Hello, > > @Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: I've uploaded new packages on mentors.debian.net > I've tested these packages by building them with pbuilder (sid distribution) > and by installing them on a fresh install of Debian Sid (today updated) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564 Title: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 718363] Re: Sync mtdev 1.1.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Hi, If build this on ubuntu, please execute debian/rules control. This commant generate debian/control and links file. I tested it generally, but please contact it if there is a problem. And I do not know whether this is the best method to maintain each other's packages. If there are other methods, please teach it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/718363 Title: Sync mtdev 1.1.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449977] Re: update vloopback-source upstream to 1.3 to support kernel 2.6.31
This bug already fixed in 1.3-2. Please close. ** Changed in: vloopback (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449977 Title: update vloopback-source upstream to 1.3 to support kernel 2.6.31 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 684302] Re: cvInvert may cause segmentation fault
Hi, I dont see me so that a patch apply to opencv-2.1.0/src/cxcore/cxlapack.cpp. cat debian/patches/*.patch | grep +++ +++ b/src/cv/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/src/cvaux/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/src/cxcore/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/src/highgui/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/src/ml/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt 2010-04-26 05:49:17.0 +0900 +++ b/src/cxcore/CMakeLists.txt 2010-04-26 06:00:09.0 +0900 +++ b/CMakeLists.txt2010-05-17 05:00:23.0 +0900 +++ b/doc/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/src/cxcore/cxsystem.cpp +++ b/samples/c/build_all.sh +++ b/include/opencv/cvinternal.h -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684302 Title: cvInvert may cause segmentation fault -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
2010/10/10 Matthieu Baerts :
> Hello Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
>
> The current version of Cairo-Dock is the 2.2.0 where Autoconf has been
> replaced by CMake.
Yes, I know this.
I already did packaging this on my local repository.
But I dont upload this to Debian. Because Debian is being freeze.
> I've updated the 'debian' configuration's files and you can see: this version
> is also available in the current repository of Ubuntu (Maverick 10.10).
> So I just want to know if it's possible the sync these packages with those
> for Debian? So the cairo-dock-plugins packages will be deprecated and
> replaced by cairo-dock-plug-ins.
> If you want, I can maintain these packages in Debian too :) . I think it's
> maybe the best solution because I already maintain Ubuntu packages. Also I'm
> part of the Cairo-Dock team so I am aware of almost everything ;)
> What do you think about that? :)
Please enter our team with pleasure if you package *Debian* Package
and maintain it :-).
However, you need to maintain and confirm working in both distribution.
And it is necessary to always maintain packages of Debian as upstream.
>
> PS: of course, I don't have the right to upload into debian repositories
> and I need a sponsor for that (and also to check a second time if
> everything is ok ;) ). So if you want, you're welcome ;) (but I can also
> contact someone else :) )
OK, No problem :-)
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 657564] Re: Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
Hi,
2010/10/10 Matthieu Baerts :
> @Matthias Klose:
>
> Hello doko,
> Is it possible to remove this source (cairo-dock-plugins) from the
> repositories? :)
>
We(Debian) cannot delete it now.
This work will start it after squeeze was released.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652057] Re: sudo: hcidump: command not found
Did you install bluez-hcidump? http://packages.ubuntu.com/en/maverick/bluez-hcidump -- sudo: hcidump: command not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600074] Re: opencv-doc does not contain actual documentation
If you want to have html documet of opencv, you can convert from pdf to html. Version 2.1 provides pdf version only. But next version of opencv (trunk version) will provide pdf and html. -- opencv-doc does not contain actual documentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588093] Re: cvMixChannels completely broken
This patch already applyed in 2.1.0-1. -- cvMixChannels completely broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600074] Re: opencv-doc does not contain actual documentation
Could you check /usr/share/doc/opencv-doc/opencv.pdf.gz? -- opencv-doc does not contain actual documentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
