[Bug 727990] [NEW] Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume control

2011-03-02 Thread Olivier Cailloux
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pulseaudio

After a (re)boot, sound play at maximum volume (e.g. in Rythmbox).
However, gnome volume control (as shown in the volume indicator or in
gnome sound preferences) shows that the volume control is at about 20%,
where I left it before the reboot. As soon as I change the volume, e.g.
with a keyboard shortcut, even only a bit, it correctly drops to the
expected 20%.

This bug has been reported in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/491704 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/552042 .

The problem does not happen if I log out and log back in, only after a
(re)boot.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: alsa-base 1.0.22.1+dfsg-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-29.58-generic-pae 2.6.32.28+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-29-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: HDA Generic [HDA Generic]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  olivier1519 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe8f8000 irq 16'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ID 892'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0892,14627599,00100302'
   Controls  : 4
   Simple ctrls  : 3
Card1.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:1 'Generic'/'HD-Audio Generic at 0xfebfc000 irq 19'
   Mixer name   : 'ATI R6xx HDMI'
   Components   : 'HDA:1002aa01,00aa0100,00100200'
   Controls  : 4
   Simple ctrls  : 1
Card1.Amixer.values:
 Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0
   Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
   Playback channels: Mono
   Mono: Playback [on]
Date: Wed Mar  2 20:24:56 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100427.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SelectedCard: 0 SB HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Title: [Realtek ID 892] ALSA test tone not correctly played back
dmi.bios.date: 08/27/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: V25.0
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: 870U-G55 (MS-7599)
dmi.board.vendor: MSI
dmi.board.version: 5.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: MSI
dmi.chassis.version: 5.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV25.0:bd08/27/2010:svnMSI:pnMS-7599:pvr5.0:rvnMSI:rn870U-G55(MS-7599):rvr5.0:cvnMSI:ct3:cvr5.0:
dmi.product.name: MS-7599
dmi.product.version: 5.0
dmi.sys.vendor: MSI

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727990

Title:
  Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume
  control

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 727990] Re: Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume control

2011-03-02 Thread Olivier Cailloux
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727990

Title:
  Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume
  control

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 727990] Re: Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume control

2011-03-02 Thread Olivier Cailloux
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: pulseaudio
  
  After a (re)boot, sound play at maximum volume (e.g. in Rythmbox).
  However, gnome volume control (as shown in the volume indicator or in
  gnome sound preferences) shows that the volume control is at about 20%,
  where I left it before the reboot. As soon as I change the volume, e.g.
- with a keyboard shortcut, even only a bit, it correctly drops to the
- expected 20%.
+ with a key press, even only a bit, it correctly drops to the expected
+ 20%.
  
  This bug has been reported in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/491704 and
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/552042 .
  
  The problem does not happen if I log out and log back in, only after a
  (re)boot.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.22.1+dfsg-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-29.58-generic-pae 2.6.32.28+drm33.13
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-29-generic-pae i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
  Architecture: i386
  ArecordDevices:
-   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
-  card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: HDA Generic [HDA Generic]
-Subdevices: 1/1
-Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
+   List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
+  card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: HDA Generic [HDA Generic]
+    Subdevices: 1/1
+    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
  AudioDevicesInUse:
-  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
-  /dev/snd/controlC0:  olivier1519 F pulseaudio
+  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
+  /dev/snd/controlC0:  olivier1519 F pulseaudio
  Card0.Amixer.info:
-  Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe8f8000 irq 16'
-Mixer name : 'Realtek ID 892'
-Components : 'HDA:10ec0892,14627599,00100302'
-Controls  : 4
-Simple ctrls  : 3
+  Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xfe8f8000 irq 16'
+    Mixer name : 'Realtek ID 892'
+    Components : 'HDA:10ec0892,14627599,00100302'
+    Controls  : 4
+    Simple ctrls  : 3
  Card1.Amixer.info:
-  Card hw:1 'Generic'/'HD-Audio Generic at 0xfebfc000 irq 19'
-Mixer name : 'ATI R6xx HDMI'
-Components : 'HDA:1002aa01,00aa0100,00100200'
-Controls  : 4
-Simple ctrls  : 1
+  Card hw:1 'Generic'/'HD-Audio Generic at 0xfebfc000 irq 19'
+    Mixer name : 'ATI R6xx HDMI'
+    Components : 'HDA:1002aa01,00aa0100,00100200'
+    Controls  : 4
+    Simple ctrls  : 1
  Card1.Amixer.values:
-  Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0
-Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
-Playback channels: Mono
-Mono: Playback [on]
+  Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0
+    Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum
+    Playback channels: Mono
+    Mono: Playback [on]
  Date: Wed Mar  2 20:24:56 2011
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100427.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SelectedCard: 0 SB HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Title: [Realtek ID 892] ALSA test tone not correctly played back
  dmi.bios.date: 08/27/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: V25.0
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: 870U-G55 (MS-7599)
  dmi.board.vendor: MSI
  dmi.board.version: 5.0
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: MSI
  dmi.chassis.version: 5.0
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV25.0:bd08/27/2010:svnMSI:pnMS-7599:pvr5.0:rvnMSI:rn870U-G55(MS-7599):rvr5.0:cvnMSI:ct3:cvr5.0:
  dmi.product.name: MS-7599
  dmi.product.version: 5.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: MSI

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727990

Title:
  Sound volume at start is not the same as the one shown on gnome volume
  control

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 539256] Re: Eclipse error message and package descriptions are uninformative for users trying to install plugins

2010-03-19 Thread Olivier Cailloux
Thanks for replying.

I admit I do not have a clear idea on how technically the problem could
be solved, nor am I willing to do it myself (for now)! I was just
mentioning that such thing is possible in the eclipse package as done by
their authors. Currently it seems to me that the ubuntu / debian
packaging of eclipse could still be improved: I think these
distributions are able to manage other systems of softwares at least as
complex as eclipse. (That said, I am very happy about the work done to
enable an easy eclipse install into ubuntu!) E.g. perl packages, latex
packages, C or java libraries, etc. You do not have to install a whole
bunch of perl packages if you want http://packages.debian.org/lenny
/libxml-libxml-common-perl. Consider as well
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/latex-beamer. These are only two
examples of packages consisting in very few files and similar, it seems
to me, to eclipse packages. Although I know there *is* a basic
uncompressible set of required packages you have to install if you want
to use perl, or LaTeX, I think it is inadequate to force the user to
install PDE to be able to use the automatic features install in eclipse.

Note that a big difference between having several LaTeX packages
installed and having to install PDE is that the former only is a bunch
of files on your hard disk (space is cheap), whereas the latter clutters
your GUI by adding entries in the preference window and in many menus.

Also the libraries used by eclipse should be shared in the whole system
as are C libraries (I already have junit, why a specific install into
eclipse folder?) ; it should be possible to install plug-ins as root
user and possibly even mandatory, using aptitude, etc. Please note I do
know that these are not easy tasks and I am not saying that anybody
should implement it right now, I know I can do it myself if I really
want it, etc. - I am simply suggesting some possible paths of (long-
term? I hope not too much!) improvement that would lead the way to a
smooth eclipse experience on linux as is currently possible with LaTeX
and plenty of other complex systems.

Solving this packaging problem in a clean manner by fully integrating
eclipse plug-ins system into the 'aptitude' system is probably a big
challenge, but would certainly add good value to the linux developers!

Once again, anyway, thanks for the work done up to here.

-- 
Eclipse error message and package descriptions are uninformative for users 
trying to install plugins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 539256] Re: Eclipse error message and package descriptions are uninformative for users trying to install plugins

2010-03-18 Thread Olivier Cailloux
FYI, the normal eclipse version (i.e., the one you can download from
the eclipse web site and simply copy in a local repository) accepts to
install plug-ins even when you do not install PDE in the first place. I
do have an eclipse install on my debian box (I think it's 3.5) with JDT,
CDT, Hibernate tools, some web tools, etc., all of these installed from
the install plug-in GUI in eclipse, without having ever installed PDT.
My original eclipse download was eclipse platform, without further plug-
ins. I like to start from a minimal install and only install the plug-
ins I need to avoid having options I do not use in the GUI menus.

If ubuntu's package do not accept this behavior it should IMHO be
considered a bug, and not be solved simply be rephrasing the description
of what purpose the PDE package serves. To put it otherwise, the PDE
package should not be necessary to install plug-ins from the eclipse
GUI.

Sorry if I misunderstood something.

-- 
Eclipse error message and package descriptions are uninformative for users 
trying to install plugins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522961] Re: hid2hci missing

2010-02-20 Thread Olivier Cailloux
Oops, hid2hci now lies in /lib/udev. I don't know how I missed that.
There is thus no bug. Although the udev rule does not activate, even
after modifying as suggested elsewhere
[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/20] but that's
a different story...


** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
hid2hci missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522961] [NEW] hid2hci missing

2010-02-16 Thread Olivier Cailloux
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: udev

I am trying to use a Logitech bluetooth hub (ID 046d:c705). AFAIU this
requires hid2hci (e.g. available on debian stable), but I can't find
this command on my ubuntu box.

Where did it disappear? Has it been replaced by something else? In which
case this should be documented somewhere... (The only thing I can say is
that my bt hub does not work, although it was working on my debian
system after using hid2hci.)

~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10
Codename:karmic

~$ lsusb | grep [0]46d
Bus 003 Device 003: ID 046d:c313 Logitech, Inc.
Bus 005 Device 009: ID 046d:c705 Logitech, Inc.
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 046d:c050 Logitech, Inc. RX 250 Optical Mouse

~$ hcitool dev
Devices:

~$ dmesg | tail -n 9
[14089.532488] usb 5-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 8
[14089.698065] usb 5-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[14089.706972] hub 5-2:1.0: USB hub found
[14089.707977] hub 5-2:1.0: 2 ports detected
[14089.981864] usb 5-2.1: new low speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 9
[14090.127961] usb 5-2.1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[14090.151180] input: Logitech USB Receiver as 
/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.3/usb5/5-2/5-2.1/5-2.1:1.0/input/input10
[14090.151321] generic-usb 0003:046D:C705.000C: input,hidraw3: USB HID v1.10 
Mouse [Logitech USB Receiver] on usb-:00:1d.3-2.1/input0
[14090.180973] generic-usb 0003:046D:C705.000D: hiddev96,hidraw4: USB HID v1.10 
Device [Logitech USB Receiver] on usb-:00:1d.3-2.1/input1

Note that this may be related to, but not exactly the same as,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/461685.

** Affects: udev (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
hid2hci missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions

2009-12-12 Thread Olivier Cailloux
I'm not sure I have the exact same bug, but better post here before
starting a new one I guess.

- I also have the can't access trash problem when trying to delete an image 
from eog from an NTFS drive (where I have write permission everywhere).
- Nautilus is however able to delete the exact same file, from the exact same 
place (i.e. the NTFS mounted drive). I don't know what Nautilus does with the 
file however. AFAI can see, the file is simply deleted, because I can't find 
it in my usual trash nor in the RECYCLER dir in the NTFS drive, and don't see 
any folder which would have been possibly created by nautilus on the root path 
of the NTFS drive for that purpose (as it does on my USB keys).

It would seem appropriate, IMHO, that eog does the same thing when I ask
it to delete a file than Nautilus does. I am not sure that Nautilus'
apparent choice of permanently deleting the file without asking is the
best choice, but that seems to be a difficult discussion I don't want to
enter into... And if the Nautilus choice is well thought, every gnome
application should have the same behavior I guess... And, finally,
anything would probably be better than the current situation (can't
delete).

I am running Ubuntu 9.04 up to date. (FYI, my problem seems to be
exactly like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eog/+bug/42571,
at least from a user point of view.)

-- 
Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT 
partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 70026] Re: Can't browse LDAP directory, yet autocompletion works fine

2008-11-20 Thread Olivier Cailloux
I am affected by this bug and using slapd. I will be able to tell you if
it is solved as soon as Debian updates his evolution version (still at
2.22 here, http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolution-data-server.html).
Any idea how to speed up the process? The Debian evolution version is
getting really old...

Olivier

-- 
Can't browse LDAP directory, yet autocompletion works fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70026
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs