[Bug 1764417] Re: Unrecoverable failure in required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop
Same, happens once a day Here's all my "important" logs. 11:44:31 spice-vdagent: Cannot access vdagent virtio channel /dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.spice.0 11:44:30 pulseaudio: [pulseaudio] backend-ofono.c: Failed to register as a handsfree audio agent with ofono: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.ofono was not provided by any .service files 11:44:16 gnome-session-b: CRITICAL: We failed, but the fail whale is dead. Sorry 11:44:16 gnome-session-b: CRITICAL: We failed, but the fail whale is dead. Sorry 11:44:16 gnome-session-b: Unrecoverable failure in required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop 11:42:46 spice-vdagent: Cannot access vdagent virtio channel /dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.spice.0 11:42:43 pulseaudio: [pulseaudio] backend-ofono.c: Failed to register as a handsfree audio agent with ofono: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.ofono was not provided by any .service files 11:42:10 spice-vdagent: Cannot access vdagent virtio channel /dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.spice.0 11:42:07 kernel: ipheth 3-3:4.2: ipheth_rcvbulk_callback: urb status: -71 11:41:57 wpa_supplicant: dbus: Failed to construct signal 11:41:57 wpa_supplicant: dbus: Failed to construct signal 11:41:57 wpa_supplicant: dbus: wpa_dbus_get_object_properties: failed to get object properties: (none) none 11:41:44 kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 2:800f11 TIME 1554910894 SOCKET 0 APIC 6 microcode 800111c 11:41:44 kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 2:800f11 TIME 1554910894 SOCKET 0 APIC 6 microcode 800111c 11:41:44 kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 0 ADDR 1baf11790 MISC d01200010100 SYND 4d00 IPID 500b0 11:41:44 kernel: mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 6: Machine Check: 0 Bank 5: bea00108 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764417 Title: Unrecoverable failure in required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1764417/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I've tried a version of maverick kernel ported to Lucid, version 2.6.35-14.20~lucid2. It was supposed to clear the problem but nop. I still have issues everytime I have moderate to high I/O on the filesystem. Tomorrow I will try another filesystem than ext4. O. Gagnon On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Brian Rogers br...@xyzw.org wrote: I've set up a PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~brian-rogers/+archive/io- kernel A Maverick kernel is building right now. The patch didn't cleanly apply to Lucid's kernel. Is there a version of the patch that's already been backported to 2.6.32? -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in The Linux Kernel: Invalid Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “linux-source-2.6.22” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 When compared with 2.6.15 in feisty, heavy disk I/O causes increased iowait times and affects desktop responsiveness in 2.6.22 this appears to be a regression from 2.6.15 where iowait is much lower and desktop responsiveness is unaffected with the same I/O load Easy to reproduce with tracker - index the same set of files with 2.6.15 kernel and 2.6.22 kernel and the difference in desktop responsiveness is massive I have not confirmed if a non-tracker process which does heavy disk i/o (especially writing) replicates this yet - will do further investigation soon To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585092] Re: giant IO delays on unmount
@Stephan Bader: from my research, the *two* bugs are related to the cleaning of the dirty inodes. Umounting a ext4 filesystem with dirty inodes will generate a lot of IO since the journal is mixed up. The same dirty inodes problem exist when there is a lot of IO since jdb2 tries to keep the journal up to date while there are errors. Umounting is just the same process but done in a single operation for the whole filesystem. -- giant IO delays on unmount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 585092] Re: giant IO delays
I've been dealing with this IO problem since a LONG time (months). I've tried kernel 2.6.32-24.39~spcbug543617a and 2.6.32-23.38~lp585092v4. The problem was still there. I then installed the 2.6.35 kernel that Tim Gardner in #38 shared and now it at last works normally Everytime I had IO on the harddrive, it was slowing/freezing my computer. Doing an apt-get upgrade was almost non possible with too much packages. Now with 2.6.35 I see almost no IO wait. I even compiled a version of Firefox for 20 minutes without any lagging, something I could not even think to do before. Thanks !! -- giant IO delays https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
For me too every time I do an apt-get upgrade, I have to let the machine there for a while because it becomes unusable. The mouse is always freezing and everything is lagging with the iowait at avoir 80%. I have a AMD Athlon 64 with 2 gigs of RAM and a SATA drive. Changed the harddrive too and the problem is still there. Very frustating. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Nickurak 131...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I'm having this issue too, with x86-64 Lucid. I'm on a 1.83Ghz Core2 Duo with 1.5gigs of ram, 2 gigs of swap, and a fast SATA hard drive. This feels very much what would happen with an old computer when DMA was disabled... but of course this is a SATA hard drive, and I don't know how to confirm if it's configured properly. It's plenty fast after a reboot, but at some point, it just gets barely usable. At apt-get upgrade will generally trigger it. Once it's there, it seems like a little hard drive IO and CPU just don't mix any more (as if DMA was disabled) -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in The Linux Kernel: Invalid Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “linux-source-2.6.22” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 When compared with 2.6.15 in feisty, heavy disk I/O causes increased iowait times and affects desktop responsiveness in 2.6.22 this appears to be a regression from 2.6.15 where iowait is much lower and desktop responsiveness is unaffected with the same I/O load Easy to reproduce with tracker - index the same set of files with 2.6.15 kernel and 2.6.22 kernel and the difference in desktop responsiveness is massive I have not confirmed if a non-tracker process which does heavy disk i/o (especially writing) replicates this yet - will do further investigation soon To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Why is this bug only at Medium importance ? It should be critical. It makes Ubuntu almost non usable. When doing an apt-get upgrade the packages, I can't even do anything else since the system freezes and the windows greys out. I suggest we change that bug to critical. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest
You would want to use bzr (Bazaar), which is a program like svn and git used by Ubuntu and Eucalyptus, to retrieve the sources you want. You should be able to find some infos how to use it on lauchpad. O L I V I E R G A G N O N F A K E ADMINISTRATEUR RÉSEAU | NETWORK ADMIN + 1 514 . 846 . 8439 | #226 Cell: 514 . 965 . 9511 WWW.FAKE-STUDIO.COM - Mail Original - De: Tom Murphy tmur...@mlp.com À: proc...@gmail.com Envoyé: Vendredi 26 Mars 2010 13:38:24 Objet: [Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest apt-get install eucalyptus-cc eucalyptus-cloud eucalyptus-common euca2ools eucalyptus-gl eucalyptus-java-common eucalyptus-nc eucalyptus-sc eucalyptus-walrus Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done eucalyptus-cc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-cloud is already the newest version. eucalyptus-common is already the newest version. euca2ools is already the newest version. eucalyptus-gl is already the newest version. eucalyptus-java-common is already the newest version. eucalyptus-nc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-sc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-walrus is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded. ok, where can I get rev. 1068.1.28 ? -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. Status in Eucalyptus: Incomplete Status in “eucalyptus” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “eucalyptus” source package in Lucid: Fix Released Bug description: I try to re-bundle a Jaunty instance with help of the ec2 tools. This fails when trying to register the image: $ euca-register jaunty-scripts/jaunty-scripts.manifest Image: Image registration failed because the manifest referenced is invalid or unavailable. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eucalyptus/+bug/470355/+subscribe -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest
You would want to use bzr (Bazaar), which is a program like svn and git used by Ubuntu and Eucalyptus, to retrieve the sources you want. You should be able to find some infos how to use it on lauchpad. O L I V I E R G A G N O N F A K E ADMINISTRATEUR RÉSEAU | NETWORK ADMIN + 1 514 . 846 . 8439 | #226 Cell: 514 . 965 . 9511 WWW.FAKE-STUDIO.COM - Mail Original - De: Tom Murphy tmur...@mlp.com À: proc...@gmail.com Envoyé: Vendredi 26 Mars 2010 13:38:24 Objet: [Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest apt-get install eucalyptus-cc eucalyptus-cloud eucalyptus-common euca2ools eucalyptus-gl eucalyptus-java-common eucalyptus-nc eucalyptus-sc eucalyptus-walrus Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done eucalyptus-cc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-cloud is already the newest version. eucalyptus-common is already the newest version. euca2ools is already the newest version. eucalyptus-gl is already the newest version. eucalyptus-java-common is already the newest version. eucalyptus-nc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-sc is already the newest version. eucalyptus-walrus is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded. ok, where can I get rev. 1068.1.28 ? -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. Status in Eucalyptus: Incomplete Status in “eucalyptus” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “eucalyptus” source package in Lucid: Fix Released Bug description: I try to re-bundle a Jaunty instance with help of the ec2 tools. This fails when trying to register the image: $ euca-register jaunty-scripts/jaunty-scripts.manifest Image: Image registration failed because the manifest referenced is invalid or unavailable. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eucalyptus/+bug/470355/+subscribe -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest
As said in message #14, the fix was in rev 1068.1.28. So if your bzr version is older than that, it is not fixed. I synced the files and recompiled eucalyptus with bzr rev 1068.1.28 some months ago and it was indeed fixed. My 70gigs image registered in seconds. -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest
As said in message #14, the fix was in rev 1068.1.28. So if your bzr version is older than that, it is not fixed. I synced the files and recompiled eucalyptus with bzr rev 1068.1.28 some months ago and it was indeed fixed. My 70gigs image registered in seconds. -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 470355] Re: ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest
Other infos here: lp:513100 -- ec2-bundle-vol and ec2-upload-bundle result in non accepted manifest https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470355 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
