[Bug 270136] Re: strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3

2008-09-28 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
This problem remains under kernel 2.6.27-4-generic from intrepid

-- 
strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270136] Re: strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3

2008-09-16 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
OK, I submit the requiered info (as attachments)

I ve also tested playing a sound file with mpg321, and what happens is
that the sound is played but in the background you heard that white
noise. Under the old kernel (2.6.24-16-generic from Gutsy) this didn't
happend.

The output of alsa-info.sh is here:

http://www.alsa-
project.org/db/?f=8b6682adbe1c9806a2acbdb16327da26e53e309f

Please ask me for any information that might be useful. Many thanks for
answering my bug report.

** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17657974/lspci-vvnn.log

-- 
strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270136] Re: strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3

2008-09-16 Thread Pablo De Nápoli

** Attachment added: Here is dmesg output
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17657979/dmesg.log

-- 
strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270136] Re: strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3

2008-09-16 Thread Pablo De Nápoli

** Attachment added: the kernel version
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17657987/version.log

-- 
strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270136] [NEW] strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3

2008-09-14 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.27-3-generic


I've been testing the kernel 2.6.27.3-generic from Intrepid 
(linux-image-2.6.27.3-4-generic_amd64) on an Acer Aspire 5050 notebook.

After starting a KDE session (using kde 3.5.9) a strange noise (sounds
like white noise) from the speaker.  I think it is because the sound
at the start of the kde session does not work fine. Under kernel
2.6.24-16-generic from Hardy this does not hapend, so it is caused by a
kernel bug (something related to irqs or timers (tickless timer), I
guess)

The audio device is ALC883 Analog (Duplex), mixer: ALC833, driver: alsa 
emulation (type 10) 
Card config: HDA ATI 58 irq 16 (as reported by KinfoCenter)

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
strange noise under kernel-2-6-27.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

2008-09-14 Thread Pablo De Nápoli

I vote for Epiphany. It integrates better with the gnome environmet.

I don't understand why Mozilla insist in EULA, brands, etc. All they can
get from this is loosing market share to other  free browsers.

-- 
AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 190107] [NEW] kernel 2.6.22.14.21 for Gutsy fails to boot

2008-02-07 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
Public bug reported:

 The latest kernel 2.6.22.14.21 for gutsy seems to have some nasty bug.
My computer fails to boot with it,it hangs with a message waiting  for
the root filesystem

The kernel 2.6.25-5 from hardy has the same problem. However a _vanilla_
2.6.24 kernel compiled by hand just works fine (I'm using it without
initrd since I suspect that it might be the cause of the problem).

As the kernel fails to boot and mout the root file system, I was not 
even able to capture dmesg from the ubuntu kernel, and syslog did not work.

The problem sees to be related to my first ide device (WDC WD600BB-00JHA0, ATA 
DISK drive, using the via chipset I guess).
It should be mounted under /dev/hda3

My own hand-compiled kernel 2.6.24 gives the following output
(so that you can see which hardware it recognizes):

: 000f - 0010 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 0010 - 2dff (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 2dff - 2dff8000 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 2dff8000 - 2e00 (ACPI NVS)
 BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec01000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: fff8 - 0001 (reserved)
735MB LOWMEM available.
found SMP MP-table at 000fbfb0
Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 188400) 0 entries of 256 used
Zone PFN ranges:
  DMA 0 - 4096
  Normal   4096 -   188400
Movable zone start PFN for each node
early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges
0:0 -   188400
On node 0 totalpages: 188400
  DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 0 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 4064 pages, LIFO batch:0
  Normal zone: 1439 pages used for memmap
  Normal zone: 182865 pages, LIFO batch:31
  Movable zone: 0 pages used for memmap
DMI 2.3 present.
ACPI: RSDP 000FAFE0, 0014 (r0 AMI   )
ACPI: RSDT 2DFF, 002C (r1 AMIINT VIA_K7 10 MSFT   97)
ACPI: FACP 2DFF0030, 0081 (r1 AMIINT VIA_K7 11 MSFT   97)
ACPI: DSDT 2DFF0120, 2B0C (r1VIA   VIA_K7 1000 MSFT  10D)
ACPI: FACS 2DFF8000, 0040
ACPI: APIC 2DFF00C0, 0054 (r1 AMIINT VIA_K7  9 MSFT   97)
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
Processor #0 6:7 APIC version 16
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
Enabling APIC mode:  Flat.  Using 1 I/O APICs
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
Allocating PCI resources starting at 3000 (gap: 2e00:d0c0)
Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 186929
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda3 ro
mapped APIC to b000 (fee0)
mapped IOAPIC to a000 (fec0)
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 16384 bytes)
Detected 1303.037 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
console [tty0] enabled
Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Memory: 743560k/753600k available (1802k kernel code, 9492k reserved, 646k 
data, 180k init, 0k highmem)
virtual kernel memory layout:
fixmap  : 0xfffb5000 - 0xf000   ( 296 kB)
vmalloc : 0xee80 - 0xfffb3000   ( 279 MB)
lowmem  : 0xc000 - 0xedff   ( 735 MB)
  .init : 0xc0368000 - 0xc0395000   ( 180 kB)
  .data : 0xc02c2abe - 0xc036436c   ( 646 kB)
  .text : 0xc010 - 0xc02c2abe   (1802 kB)
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 2608.25 BogoMIPS (lpj=5216508)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0383fbff c1c3fbff    
  
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: After all inits, caps: 0383fbff c1c3fbff  0420  
  
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
Compat vDSO mapped to e000.
CPU: AMD Duron(tm)  stepping 01
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
Freeing SMP alternatives: 0k freed
ACPI: Core revision 20070126
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
net_namespace: 64 bytes
NET: Registered protocol family 16
ACPI: bus type pci registered
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfdb41, last bus=1
PCI: Using configuration type 1
Setting up standard PCI resources
ACPI: EC: Look up EC in DSDT
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5)
ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (:00)
PCI quirk: 

[Bug 106260] Re: Boot hangs with Waiting for root file system since kernel 2.6.20-14

2008-02-05 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106063 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106063

I'm having this same problem

-- 
Boot hangs with Waiting for root file system since kernel 2.6.20-14
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177037] The Kubuntu alternate installer CD lacks adsl support

2007-12-17 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
Public bug reported:

The Kubuntu altenate CD (7.10, Gusty) lacks support for adsl conections 
(it does sopport direct conection to the internet, even http proxy).

I would suggest including the packages pppoe y ppoeconf (the last could be
integrated into the Debian installer), so that users with adsl conections
could use it during the instalation process.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
The Kubuntu alternate installer CD lacks adsl support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177037
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177040] kde themes does not work in kubuntu

2007-12-17 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
Public bug reported:

In Kubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy), the kdm configuration module from kcontrol
(access control in system preferences) does not work as one would expect.

The changes made to the kdm theme (for example the background picture 
or the legend Wellcome to Kubuntu) are ignored due to the 
fact that they are overide by the settings in the file

/etc/default/kdm.d/20_kubuntu_default_setting

I really don't lilke the theme in Gusty, but I find really hard to change it
I would like to at least be able to change it to the  default kde theme
(or even more, use the temes from the kde-kdm-themes)

You need to edit some scripts by hand (and even being myself an experienced 
linux users, it was really hard for me to find the right one!)

Isn't Ubuntu intended to be a user-friendly distribution ?
Then, it would be nice to provide  user-friendly tool for changing the kdm 
theme.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
kde themes does not work in kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177042] please let the user keep the artwork during the upgrade

2007-12-17 Thread Pablo De Nápoli
Public bug reported:


When upgrading my Kubuntu 7.04 (Feisty) to 7.10 (Gutsy) all the artwork
(wallpaper, colors, kdmtheme, etc) was changed.

There is no necesity to do so. I honestly liked the theme in 7.04, but
really dislike the one in 7.10. It ok, it is just a matter of taste. But users
should be able to chose the one they prefer.

What about packaging the artowk in a package like 
kubuntu-artwork-feisty /  kubuntu-artwork-gutsy so the user can choose 
which one to install?

I think that if Ubuntu is intended to be a user friendly distribution, you 
should know that users don't like non-compatible upgrades. If you 
change something during the upgrade, it should be for a good reason.
I don't believe that new always means better, so what is the need for
a change of the theme in every release?

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
please let the user keep the artwork during the upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177042
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs