[Bug 1929048] Re: Speed up resume time on HP laptops

2024-04-30 Thread Paul Menzel
This is upstream [commit
79d341e26ebc](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=79d341e26ebcdbc622348b6f8f89b6fdb25f).
Thank you for upstreaming it.

It’d be great, if you also documented the measurements. Do you still
have them, and can add them here as a comment?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929048

Title:
  Speed up resume time on HP laptops

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1929048/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] Re: 21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial devices

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
My bad, actually looking on the device, *brltty* was installed for a
long time. :-(

/var/log/dpkg.log.12.gz:2020-06-24 18:24:40 upgrade brltty:amd64
5.6-11ubuntu2 6.0+dfsg-4ubuntu6

Sorry about the confusion. It looks like the user tested this exact USB
serial converter (0403:6001) the first time.

```
Mai 30 12:14:14 Ixpees kernel: Linux version 5.15.0-33-generic 
(buildd@lcy02-amd64-037) (gcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0, GNU ld (GNU 
Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.38) #34-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 18 13:34:26 UTC 2022 (Ubuntu 
5.15.0-33.34-generic 5.15.30)
[…]
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: new full-speed USB device number 4 
using xhci_hcd
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=0403, 
idProduct=6001, bcdDevice= 6.00
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, 
Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: Product: USB Serial Converter
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: Manufacturer: FTDI
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: SerialNumber: FTFCV4W7
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees mtp-probe[3062]: checking bus 3, device 4: 
"/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.0/:01:00.0/:02:02.0/:39:00.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.1"
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees mtp-probe[3062]: bus: 3, device: 4 was not an MTP device
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees snapd[1117]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: Unable to 
parse uevent, err: cannot parse libudev event: invalid env data
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees snapd[1117]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: Unable to 
parse uevent, err: cannot parse libudev event: invalid env data
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees systemd[1]: Starting Braille Device Support...
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: calling  usb_serial_init+0x0/0x1000 [usbserial] 
@ 3008
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver 
usbserial_generic
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usbserial: USB Serial support registered for 
generic
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: initcall usb_serial_init+0x0/0x1000 [usbserial] 
returned 0 after 105 usecs
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: calling  usb_serial_module_init+0x0/0x1000 
[ftdi_sio] @ 3008
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver ftdi_sio
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usbserial: USB Serial support registered for 
FTDI USB Serial Device
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: ftdi_sio 3-1.1:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device 
converter detected
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: Detected FT232RL
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: usb 3-1.1: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now 
attached to ttyUSB0
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees kernel: initcall usb_serial_module_init+0x0/0x1000 
[ftdi_sio] returned 0 after 2817 usecs
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees mtp-probe[3069]: checking bus 3, device 4: 
"/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1c.0/:01:00.0/:02:02.0/:39:00.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.1"
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees mtp-probe[3069]: bus: 3, device: 4 was not an MTP device
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees snapd[1117]: udevmon.go:149: udev event error: Unable to 
parse uevent, err: cannot parse libudev event: invalid env data
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: BRLTTY 6.4 rev BRLTTY-6.4 
[https://brltty.app/]
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: BRLTTY 6.4 rev BRLTTY-6.4 
[https://brltty.app/]
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: executing as the invoking user: root
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: brltty: executing as the invoking user: 
root
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: brltty: directory created: /var/lib/brltty
Mai 30 12:16:13 Ixpees brltty[3064]: directory created: /var/lib/brltty
```


In the past 0403:6015 was used for example:

```
Aug 26 10:33:08 Ixpees kernel: Linux version 5.8.0-050800-generic 
(kernel@gloin) (gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-13ubuntu1) 9.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for 
Ubuntu) 2.34) #202007052030 SMP Mon Jul 6 00:37:33 UTC 2020
[…]
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 13 
using xhci_hcd
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0403, 
idProduct=6015, bcdDevice=10.00
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, 
Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: Product: FT230X Basic UART
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: Manufacturer: FTDI
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usb 1-1: SerialNumber: D307FNWS
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees mtp-probe[3194]: checking bus 1, device 13: 
"/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb1/1-1"
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees mtp-probe[3194]: bus: 1, device: 13 was not an MTP device
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: calling  usb_serial_init+0x0/0x1000 [usbserial] 
@ 3193
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usbcore: registered new interface driver 
usbserial_generic
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usbserial: USB Serial support registered for 
generic
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: initcall usb_serial_init+0x0/0x1000 [usbserial] 
returned 0 after 119 usecs
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: calling  usb_serial_module_init+0x0/0x1000 
[ftdi_sio] @ 3193
Aug 26 10:37:24 Ixpees kernel: usbcore: 

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeScreenlog.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeScreenlog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594312/+files/VarLogDistupgradeScreenlog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594309/+files/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594311/+files/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594310/+files/VarLogDistupgradeLspcitxt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594307/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594308/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] ProcEnviron.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594305/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594306/+files/VarLogDistupgradeAptHistorylog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] JournalErrors.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594303/+files/JournalErrors.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594304/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] Re: 21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial devices

2022-06-01 Thread Paul Menzel
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected dist-upgrade jammy wayland-session

** Description changed:

  On a default Ubuntu desktop installation (with GNOME) doing `do-release-
  upgrade` from 21.10 to 22.04 installed *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial
  devices.
  
  ```
  [ 2435.150025] usb 1-2: new full-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
  [ 2435.305646] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0403, idProduct=6001, 
bcdDevice= 6.00
  [ 2435.305660] usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=3
  [ 2435.305666] usb 1-2: Product: USB Serial Converter
  [ 2435.305671] usb 1-2: Manufacturer: FTDI
  [ 2435.305675] usb 1-2: SerialNumber: FTFCV4W7
  [ 2435.311747] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected
  [ 2435.311824] usb 1-2: Detected FT232RL
  [ 2435.313260] usb 1-2: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to 
ttyUSB0
  
  [ 2437.583625] usb 1-2: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by ftdi_sio while 'brltty' 
sets config #1
  [ 2437.585095] ftdi_sio ttyUSB0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now 
disconnected from ttyUSB0
  [ 2437.585168] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: device disconnected 
  ```
  
  The brltty problem is tracked in the Debian BTS as #667616 [1], and the
  solution is to remove the package with `sudo apt purge brltty`.
  
  The question is though, why `do-release-upgrade` installed it in the
  first place. I do not remember the problem from earlier release
  upgrades.
  
  
  [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/667616
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
+ CrashDB: ubuntu
+ CrashReports:
+  644:0:116:0:2022-05-31 15:11:54.155275593 +0200:2022-05-31 
15:11:53.683275612 +0200:/var/crash/kdump_lock
+  644:0:116:325:2022-05-31 15:11:57.819275442 +0200:2019-08-23 
14:33:45.567141279 +0200:/var/crash/kexec_cmd
+ CurrentDesktop: GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-20 (1898 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215.2)
+ Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader (not installed)
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-33.34-generic 5.15.30
+ Tags:  wayland-session jammy dist-upgrade
+ Uname: Linux 5.15.0-33-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-05-06 (26 days ago)
+ UserGroups: adm lpadmin sambashare sudo
+ VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog:
+  INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running
+  INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293/+attachment/5594302/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958224] Re: brltty claiming cp210x devices on 22.04

2022-05-30 Thread Paul Menzel
1.  This is Debian bug report #667616.
2.  *brltty* was installed when doing `do-release-upgrade` from 21.10 to 22.04 
[2].


[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/667616
[2]: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #667616
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667616

** Also affects: brltty (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667616
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958224

Title:
  brltty claiming cp210x devices on 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brltty/+bug/1958224/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976293] [NEW] 21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial devices

2022-05-30 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

On a default Ubuntu desktop installation (with GNOME) doing `do-release-
upgrade` from 21.10 to 22.04 installed *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial
devices.

```
[ 2435.150025] usb 1-2: new full-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
[ 2435.305646] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0403, idProduct=6001, 
bcdDevice= 6.00
[ 2435.305660] usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[ 2435.305666] usb 1-2: Product: USB Serial Converter
[ 2435.305671] usb 1-2: Manufacturer: FTDI
[ 2435.305675] usb 1-2: SerialNumber: FTFCV4W7
[ 2435.311747] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter detected
[ 2435.311824] usb 1-2: Detected FT232RL
[ 2435.313260] usb 1-2: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now attached to ttyUSB0

[ 2437.583625] usb 1-2: usbfs: interface 0 claimed by ftdi_sio while 'brltty' 
sets config #1
[ 2437.585095] ftdi_sio ttyUSB0: FTDI USB Serial Device converter now 
disconnected from ttyUSB0
[ 2437.585168] ftdi_sio 1-2:1.0: device disconnected 
```

The brltty problem is tracked in the Debian BTS as #667616 [1], and the
solution is to remove the package with `sudo apt purge brltty`.

The question is though, why `do-release-upgrade` installed it in the
first place. I do not remember the problem from earlier release
upgrades.


[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/667616

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976293

Title:
  21.10 → 22.04: Installs *brltty* breaking FTDI USB serial  devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1976293/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960592] Re: `apt build-dep qemu-system-ppc` fails

2022-02-15 Thread Paul Menzel
Thank you all for your help.

$ apt-cache policy qemu gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu
qemu:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1.1
  Version table:
 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1.1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports impish-updates/universe 
ppc64el Packages
 1:6.0+dfsg-2expubuntu1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports impish/universe ppc64el 
Packages
N: Unable to locate package gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu

But:

$ apt-cache policy gcc-powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc-powerpc-linux-gnu:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports impish/universe ppc64el 
Packages

Thank you for telling me about `--arch-only`. That seems to be it.

$ sudo eatmydata apt --arch-only build-dep qemu
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.

As I had manually installed the dependencies before, nothing happened as
expected.

** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960592

Title:
  `apt build-dep qemu-system-ppc` fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1960592/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960592] [NEW] `apt build-dep qemu-system-ppc` fails

2022-02-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu 21.10 (ppc64le) trying to install QEMU’s build dependencies
fails with:

```
$ sudo apt build-dep qemu-system-ppc
Reading package lists... Done
Picking 'qemu' as source package instead of 'qemu-system-ppc'
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 builddeps:qemu : Depends: gcc-alpha-linux-gnu but it is not installable
  Depends: gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu but it is not installable
  Depends: gcc-sparc64-linux-gnu but it is not installable
  Depends: gcc-hppa-linux-gnu but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
```

** Affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960592

Title:
  `apt build-dep qemu-system-ppc` fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1960592/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] Re: bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-17 Thread Paul Menzel
The system was updated from Ubuntu 20.04 to 21.10, but it’s still not
working out of the box without the script `a2dp.py`.

I am not able to work more on the issue, as I do not have the
environment, but maybe Canonical and Google should work more closely
together on the QA side.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1827452] Re: null pointer dereference in uvcvideo

2022-01-15 Thread Paul Menzel
I read at [1] about the issue.

@kaihengfeng, I suggest to send the patch upstream for review even with
no tests. Maybe there will be testers on the Linux kernel mailing list.

[1]: https://etbe.coker.com.au/2022/01/09/video-conferencing-lca/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827452

Title:
  null pointer dereference in uvcvideo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1827452/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] Re: bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-05 Thread Paul Menzel
Yes, thank you for assigning the right component.

Personally, for desktops, I would always recommend the latest release. I
think a lot of users do not know the difference, and just click the
green button.

> We also have the latest BlueZ in Ubuntu already.

Do you mean 21.10, which has 5.60-0ubuntu2.1? Ubuntu 20.04 has
5.53-0ubuntu3.4.

Also, as written, `bluetoothd` seemed to have crashed several times, and
the user allowed the crash reporter to upload the traces. Where can
those be found?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] Re: bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-05 Thread Paul Menzel
I understand, that bugs are probably fixed in newer versions.

https://ubuntu.com/#download still offers Ubuntu 20.04 for desktops, and
even highlighted green. So what functionality can users expect?

Anyway, I just wanted to report it, and, as it is not my device, I am
also unable to debug more.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] Re: bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-01 Thread Paul Menzel
** Attachment added: "a2dp.py fixing the problem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+attachment/5550575/+files/a2dp-0.6.2.py

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] Re: bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-01 Thread Paul Menzel
This is not my system, so I cannot debug a lot.

Linux kernel 5.4.x is used, and Linux logs hci related messages, and
bluetoothd also segfaults. (Ubuntu noticed the crash, and should have
uploaded the resulting dumps.)

What fixed it was using `a2dp.py`:

```
$ curl 
"https://gist.githubusercontent.com/pylover/d68be364adac5f946887b85e6ed6e7ae/raw/install.sh;
 | sh
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  Speed
100   314  100   3140 0664  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--   670
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  Speed
100 11977  100 119770 0  27402  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 27470
a2dp installation was successfull.
Run a2dp.py [-h/--help] and enjoy the HiFi music!
$ a2dp.py
Connection MADE
Selecting device:
1. XXX
2. XXX
3. 14:C1:4E:99:XX:XX Office speaker
4. XXX
5. XXX
Select device[1]:
3
Device MAC: 14:C1:4E:99:XX:XX
Device ID: bluez_card.14_C1_4E_99_XX_XX
Sink: bluez_sink.14_C1_4E_99_XX_XX
Updating default sink to bluez_sink.14_C1_4E_99_XX_XX
Setting the off profile
Disconnecting the device.
Connecting again.
Device ID: bluez_card.14_C1_4E_99_XX_XX
Setting the a2dp profile
Updating default sink to bluez_sink.14_C1_4E_99_XX_XX
Ignoring: Command: pacmd list-sink-inputs | grep "index:" failed with status: 1
stderr:
Exiting bluetoothctl
"Enjoy" the HiFi stereo music 
```

** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956147] [NEW] bluetooth: Google Nest not working

2022-01-01 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Connect a Google Nest to a ASUS laptop running Ubuntu 20.04, the devices
pair, and *Office Speaker* shows up as an output device in the *Sound*
settings, but no sound is heard (also doing the speaker test).

In Debian sid/unstable with GNOME Shell 41.2 and *gnome-bluetooth*
3.34.5-4, there is one more row in the audio settings allowing to set up
some codecs. After changing that around, it finally works.

Ubuntu probably needs something similar.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of audio/sound dialog in Debian sid/unstable"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147/+attachment/5550544/+files/debian-sid-unstable.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956147

Title:
  bluetooth: Google Nest not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1956147/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1751508] Re: Xwayland crashed with SIGABRT in OsAbort() from AbortServer() from FatalError("Couldn't add screen\n") from InitOutput()

2021-12-27 Thread Paul Menzel
** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues #1279
   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1279

** Also affects: xorg-server via
   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1279
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751508

Title:
  Xwayland crashed with SIGABRT in OsAbort() from AbortServer() from
  FatalError("Couldn't add screen\n") from InitOutput()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/1751508/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1750199] Re: Blurry Icons on HighDPI

2021-09-21 Thread Paul Menzel
Under *Tools* → *Options* → *View*, what theme do you have selected?

Even with *Elementary (SVG)* I get blurry icons with *libreoffice*
7.2.1-3 from Debian sid/unstable.

I reported the issue [upstream][1].

[1]: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144583

** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #144583
   https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144583

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750199

Title:
  Blurry Icons on HighDPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1750199/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1937245] Re: ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Menzel
The article *Firefox 90 on POWER (and a JIT progress report)* [1]
summarizes the issue in NSS. It’s upstream bug report 1566124 [2], and
there are two simple patches to be applied to NSS 3.66.

Starting Firefox with `NSS_DISABLE_PPC_GHASH=1` works around the issue.

[1]: https://www.talospace.com/2021/07/firefox-90-on-power-and-jit-progress.html
[2]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1566124

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937245

Title:
  ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code:
  SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937245/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1937245] Re: ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

2021-08-10 Thread Paul Menzel
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1566124
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1566124

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937245

Title:
  ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code:
  SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937245/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1937245] [NEW] ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

2021-07-22 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Firefox 90.0+build1-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 fails to load HTTPS URLs with the
error:

> Secure Connection Failed
>
> An error occurred during a connection to blog.fefe.de. The client has 
> encountered bad data from the server.
>
> Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER
>
> *   The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity 
> of the received data could not be verified.
> *   Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.

Nothing related is logged in the terminal window, Firefox was started
from.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937245

Title:
  ppc64le: Fails to load HTTPS pages with `Error code:
  SSL_ERROR_BAD_SERVER`

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937245/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1890467] Re: wmi_bus wmi_bus-PNP0C14:00: WQBC data block query control method not found

2021-06-22 Thread Paul Menzel
I am also seeing this on a the AMD Ryzen desktop system Dell OptiPlex
5055 with Linux 5.13-rc7.

[0.00] DMI: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 5055 Ryzen CPU/0P03DX, BIOS 1.1.25 
05/03/2021
[…]
[   12.810715] wmi_bus wmi_bus-PNP0C14:00: WQBC data block query control 
method not found
[   12.820176] acpi PNP0C14:01: duplicate WMI GUID 
05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910 (first instance was on PNP0C14:00)

Alex, to summarize, this is a firmware bug, so needs to be reported to
Dell?

Is there any way to check, what features do not work? Then it’d be
easier to verify that and talk to the Dell support.

Lastly, the Dell Linux maintainers could be contacted too.

DELL SMBIOS WMI DRIVER
L:  dell.client.ker...@dell.com
L:  platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org
S:  Maintained
F:  drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
F:  tools/wmi/dell-smbios-example.c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890467

Title:
  wmi_bus wmi_bus-PNP0C14:00: WQBC data block query control method not
  found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1890467/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1931630] Re: Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ` cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

2021-06-12 Thread Paul Menzel
** Package changed: procps (Ubuntu) => linux-meta-kvm (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931630

Title:
  Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ`
  cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-kvm/+bug/1931630/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1931630] Re: Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ` cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

2021-06-10 Thread Paul Menzel
In #ubuntu-ser...@irc.libera.chat I was told to move this issue to
*linux-image-kvm*. How can I do that?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931630

Title:
  Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ`
  cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1931630/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1931630] [NEW] Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ` cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

2021-06-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

*procps* ships `/etc/sysctl.d/10-magic-sysrq.conf:kernel.sysrq = 176`,
which is run by `systemd-sysctl.service`. This fails on a system run
with a Linux image built for virtual machines *linux-image-kvm*, which
has `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ` not set.

```
$ sudo /lib/systemd/systemd-sysctl
Couldn't write '176' to 'kernel/sysrq', ignoring: No such file or directory
Not setting net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries (explicit setting exists).
Not setting net/ipv4/conf/default/promote_secondaries (explicit setting exists).
Couldn't write 'fq_codel' to 'net/core/default_qdisc', ignoring: No such file 
or directory
Couldn't write '4194304' to 'kernel/pid_max': Invalid argument
$ grep SYSRQ /boot/config-5.4.0-1009-kvm
# CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not set
```

** Affects: procps (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931630

Title:
  Linux images for virtual machines with unset `CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ`
  cause `10-magic-sysrq.conf` to fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1931630/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927540] [NEW] /var/lib/dpkg/info/nis.postinst: 76: [: -eq: unexpected operator

2021-05-06 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

With `/bin/sh` being dash and not Bash, the postinst script fails.

```
$ sudo apt reinstall nis
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 14.2 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports hirsute/universe ppc64el nis all 
4.2 [14.2 kB]
Fetched 14.2 kB in 0s (110 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 420369 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../apt/archives/nis_4.2_all.deb ...
update-rc.d: error: unable to read /etc/init.d/nis
Unpacking nis (4.2) over (4.2) ...
Setting up nis (4.2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/nis.postinst: 76: [: -eq: unexpected operator
```

Using `/bin/bash` and doing `dpkg -a --configure` seems to fix this
issue. The bashism can probably  be rewritten.

** Affects: nis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927540

Title:
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/nis.postinst: 76: [: -eq: unexpected operator

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1927540/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923714] Re: groovy-proposed: Unable to upgrade to 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1

2021-04-14 Thread Paul Menzel
Rico is right. I only had the entry below. No idea, if I only added the
line below several versions ago or some upgrade changed it. (Probably
the former.)

deb http://de.ports.ubuntu.com groovy-proposed main restricted

Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed I added
`multiverse universe`, and now the upgrade went through.

Sorry for the noise. Please close the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923714

Title:
  groovy-proposed: Unable to upgrade to 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1923714/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923714] [NEW] groovy-proposed: Unable to upgrade to 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1

2021-04-14 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Among other, package *libreoffice* 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1 is missing in
the *groovy-proposed* archives.

```
$ more /etc/os-release 
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.10 (Groovy Gorilla)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.10"
VERSION_ID="20.10"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-poli
cy"
VERSION_CODENAME=groovy
UBUNTU_CODENAME=groovy
$ apt list --upgradable 
Listing... Done
libreoffice-base-core/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el 
[upgradable from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-calc/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-core/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-draw/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-gnome/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-gtk3/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-impress/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el 
[upgradable from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-math/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
libreoffice-writer/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable 
from: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
python3-uno/groovy-proposed 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
```

```
$ apt-cache policy libreoffice-math
libreoffice-math:
  Installed: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
  Candidate: 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
  Version table:
 1:7.0.5-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com groovy-proposed/main ppc64el Packages
 *** 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports groovy-updates/main ppc64el 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports groovy/main ppc64el Packages
$ apt-cache policy libreoffice
libreoffice:
  Installed: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
  Candidate: 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1
  Version table:
 *** 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports groovy-updates/universe 
ppc64el Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 500
500 http://de.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports groovy/universe ppc64el 
Packages
```

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- ppc64le: Unable to upgrade
+ groovy-proposed: Unable to upgrade to 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923714

Title:
  groovy-proposed: Unable to upgrade to 7.0.5-0ubunt0.20.10.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1923714/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1521173] Re: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

2021-04-09 Thread Paul Menzel
Please create a separate bug report, as the error type is different from
the original report here. Also, in the new report (best upstream), give
more information (firmware version, extension cards, …), and also
*attach* (not paste) the output of `lspci -tvnn` and `sudo lspci
-vvxxx`.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521173

Title:
  AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1521173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1521173] Re: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

2021-04-09 Thread Paul Menzel
For every one affected, at least attach the output of `lspci -nn`,
`dmesg`, and give details for your system.

As this bug has gotten long, and causes go from firmware, firmware
configuration to hardware issues, it’s better if you opened a separate
report directly upstream, after testing the current Linux kernel using
Ubuntu PPA repository [1].

[1]: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521173

Title:
  AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1521173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922082] [NEW] Exec binary '/usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify' does not exist: No such file or directory

2021-03-31 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

On ppc64le and Ubuntu 20.10 with *evolution-data-server* 3.38.1-1, the
logs contain, when starting an Xfce session over X2Go.

   [98982.444956] systemd-xdg-autostart-generator[297820]: Exec binary 
'/usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify' does not exist: No 
such file or directory
   [98982.444963] systemd-xdg-autostart-generator[297820]: Not generating 
service for XDG autostart 
app-org.gnome.Evolution\x2dalarm\x2dnotify-autostart.service, error parsing 
Exec= line: No such file or directory

The executable is missing.

$ dpkg -S /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify
dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern 
/usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-notify

(In Debian sid/unstable it is present.)

** Affects: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922082

Title:
  Exec binary '/usr/libexec/evolution-data-server/evolution-alarm-
  notify' does not exist: No such file or directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/1922082/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919121] [NEW] /usr/bin/grub-editenv: error: invalid environment block.

2021-03-15 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Upgrading GRUB on a ppc64le machine (8335-GCA (IBM Power System S822LC))

2021-03-15 08:20:23 upgrade grub-common:ppc64el 2.04-1ubuntu26.8
2.04-1ubuntu26.11

`grub-initrd-fallback.service` failed to restart.

```
$ sudo journalctl -xe
[…]
Mar 15 08:20:30 s822lc grub-editenv[2481630]: /usr/bin/grub-editenv: error: 
invalid environment block.
Mar 15 08:20:30 s822lc systemd[1]: grub-initrd-fallback.service: Main process 
exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
-- Subject: Unit process exited
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://www.ubuntu.com/support
-- 
-- An ExecStart= process belonging to unit grub-initrd-fallback.service has 
exited.
-- 
-- The process' exit code is 'exited' and its exit status is 1.
Mar 15 08:20:30 s822lc systemd[1]: grub-initrd-fallback.service: Failed with 
result 'exit-code'.
-- Subject: Unit failed
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://www.ubuntu.com/support
-- 
-- The unit grub-initrd-fallback.service has entered the 'failed' state with 
result 'exit-code'.
Mar 15 08:20:30 s822lc systemd[1]: Failed to start GRUB failed boot detection.
-- Subject: A start job for unit grub-initrd-fallback.service has failed
```

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919121

Title:
  /usr/bin/grub-editenv: error: invalid environment block.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1919121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915007] Re: ppc64le: `/usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-bootdev` hangs during upgrade

2021-02-08 Thread Paul Menzel
** Attachment added: "Output of `strace -ff prep-bootdev -l`"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1915007/+attachment/5461237/+files/strace-prep-bootdev-l.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915007

Title:
  ppc64le: `/usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-bootdev` hangs during
  upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1915007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915007] [NEW] ppc64le: `/usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-bootdev` hangs during upgrade

2021-02-08 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Doing `apt upgrade`

2021-02-08 10:41:20 upgrade grub-ieee1275:ppc64el 2.04-1ubuntu26
2.04-1ubuntu26.8

the postinst hangs:

```
root  236284  0.0  0.0  18304  9536 ?S09:59   0:00 sudo apt 
full-upgrade
root  236285  0.0  0.0  77376 64256 ?S09:59   0:04  \_ apt 
full-upgrade
root  253209  0.0  0.0  21440 14336 pts/1Ss+  11:10   0:04  \_ 
/usr/bin/dpkg --status-fd 45 --configure --pending
root  305396  0.0  0.0  33408 24896 pts/1S+   11:19   0:00  \_ 
/usr/bin/perl -w /usr/share/debconf/frontend 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-ieee1275.postinst configure 2.04-1ubuntu26
root  305407  0.0  0.0  12032  5632 pts/1S+   11:19   0:00  
\_ /bin/bash /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-ieee1275.postinst configure 2.04-1ubuntu26
root  305520  0.0  0.0   8960  3328 pts/1D+   11:19   0:00  
\_ /usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-bootdev
```

Trying to debug a little `sudo /usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-
bootdev -l` hangs too. strace shows, that it hangs when opening the non-
existing `/dev/sdf`:

```
$ lsblk
NAME   MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop17:10  65.3M  1 loop /snap/lxd/19012
loop27:2054M  1 loop /snap/core18/1987
loop37:30  91.1M  1 loop /snap/core/10582
loop47:4054M  1 loop /snap/core18/1946
loop57:50  91.1M  1 loop /snap/core/10575
loop67:60  65.3M  1 loop /snap/lxd/19163
sda  8:01 931.5G  0 disk 
├─sda1   8:11 7M  0 part 
└─sda2   8:21 931.5G  0 part /var/lib/docker/btrfs
sdb  8:16   1 931.5G  0 disk /amd/flughafenberlinbrandenburgwillybrandt/0
sr0 11:01  1024M  0 rom  
sr1 11:11  1024M  0 rom  
sr2 11:21  1024M  0 rom  
sr3 11:31  1024M  0 rom
$ sudo strace -ff /usr/lib/grub/powerpc-ieee1275/prep-bootdev -l
[…]
lstat("/dev", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4920, ...}) = 0
lstat("/dev/sdc", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x20), ...}) = 0
stat("/dev/sdc", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x20), ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sdc", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sdc", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
lstat("/dev", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4920, ...}) = 0
lstat("/dev/sdd", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x30), ...}) = 0
stat("/dev/sdd", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x30), ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sdd", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sdd", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
lstat("/dev", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4920, ...}) = 0
lstat("/dev/sde", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x40), ...}) = 0
stat("/dev/sde", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x40), ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sde", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sde", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOMEDIUM (No medium found)
lstat("/dev", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4920, ...}) = 0
lstat("/dev/sdf", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x50), ...}) = 0
stat("/dev/sdf", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x8, 0x50), ...}) = 0
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/sdf", O_RDONLY
```

```
$ sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop1: 65.28 MiB, 68444160 bytes, 133680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop2: 54.4 MiB, 56668160 bytes, 110680 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop3: 91.6 MiB, 95477760 bytes, 186480 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop4: 53.99 MiB, 56590336 bytes, 110528 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop5: 91.6 MiB, 95477760 bytes, 186480 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/loop6: 65.29 MiB, 68456448 bytes, 133704 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes


Disk /dev/sda: 931.53 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: ST1000NX0313
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 242ACBC1-F70A-4E15-91B8-8340D055F79B

Device StartEndSectors   Size Type
/dev/sda1   2048  16383  14336 7M PowerPC PReP boot
/dev/sda2  16384 1953523711 1953507328 931.5G Linux filesystem


Disk /dev/sdb: 931.53 GiB, 1000204886016 

[Bug 1883065] Re: Dell Latitude/Precision, sig=0x806ec/20090609: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

2020-11-24 Thread Paul Menzel
I create upstream issue https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-
Microcode-Data-Files/issues/35.

** Bug watch added: 
github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/issues #35
   https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/issues/35

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065

Title:
  Dell Latitude/Precision, sig=0x806ec/20090609: Linux hangs without
  plugged in power cable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1883065/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901815] [NEW] Release 20.10 announced despite already running it

2020-10-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu announces the 20.10 release, despite it running already. Probably
related to some poor integration of *oem-release* (purged) or *oem-
config* .

```
user@helmut-XPS-13-9310:~$ ssh helmut@192.168.0.3
Welcome to Ubuntu 20.10 (GNU/Linux 5.10.0-rc1+ x86_64)

 * Documentation:  https://help.ubuntu.com
 * Management: https://landscape.canonical.com
 * Support:https://ubuntu.com/advantage

0 Aktualisierungen können sofort installiert werden.
0 dieser Aktualisierung sind Sicherheitsaktualisierungen.

New release '20.10' available.
Run 'do-release-upgrade' to upgrade to it.

Last login: Tue Oct 27 16:47:23 2020 from 192.168.0.7
user@helmut-XPS-13-9310:~$ more /etc/os-release 
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.10 (Groovy Gorilla)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.10"
VERSION_ID="20.10"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=groovy
UBUNTU_CODENAME=groovy

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901815

Title:
  Release 20.10 announced despite already running it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1901815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901765] [NEW] Unable to deal with release upgrades

2020-10-27 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

On a Dell XPS 13 9310 with shipped Dell Ubuntu 20.04.1, after allowing
release upgrades, and running `sudo do-release-upgrade` and upgrading to
20.10, looking at `/etc/os-release` still showed 20.04, as it was
redirected to `/usr/lib/os-release.oem`.

The integration really needs to be improved to allow users to upgrade.

** Affects: oem-config (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901765

Title:
  Unable to deal with release upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1901765/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901670] [NEW] gdbus crashed with segmentation fault

2020-10-27 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

With (Dell) Ubuntu 20.04.1 on a Dell XPS 13 9310, after allowing release
upgrades, the process crashed the first time.

```
$ sudo do-release-upgrade 
Neue Veröffentlichungen von Ubuntu werden gesucht
Holen:1 Signatur der Aktualisierungsanwendung [819 B]  
Holen:2 Aktualisierungsanwendung [1.338 kB]
Es wurden 1.339 kB in 0 s geholt (0 B/s)   
»groovy.tar.gz« wird gegenüber »groovy.tar.gz.gpg« legitimiert 
»groovy.tar.gz« wird entpackt

Zwischenspeicher wird gelesen
Speicherzugriffsfehler
```

```
$ dmesg
[…]
[42711.249670] gdbus[38237]: segfault at a0 ip 7fb16b69f0cd sp 
7fb163ffea60 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7fb16b67b000+178000]
[42711.249681] Code: fd ff 49 83 c5 02 41 0f b7 6d fe 49 89 c6 4c 8d 78 fe 4d 
85 e4 75 13 eb cc 0f 1f 40 00 4c 8b 63 08 48 83 c3 08 4d 85 e4 74 bb <66> 41 3b 
2c 24 75 ec 49 8d 7c 24 02 4c 89 fa 4c 89 ee e8 9c c4 fd
[…]
```

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.28 [origin: unknown]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.6.0-1032.33-oem 5.6.19
Uname: Linux 5.6.0-1032-oem x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 27 10:45:53 2020
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
 # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
 # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
 canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-16 (10 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20200502-05:58
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: release-upgrade
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-27 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeAptlog:
 Log time: 2020-10-27 10:45:21.955323
 Log time: 2020-10-27 10:45:24.032294
modified.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 2020-10-27T10:40:13.677932

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901670

Title:
  gdbus crashed with segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1901670/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897745] Re: Surface Pro 4 with Linux 5.4.x: WPA: Failed to set GTK to the driver

2020-09-29 Thread Paul Menzel
The output of `ubuntu-bug` is attached, and contains everything that’s
needed as far as I can see.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897745

Title:
  Surface Pro 4 with Linux 5.4.x: WPA: Failed to set GTK to the driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1897745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897745] [NEW] Surface Pro 4 with Linux 5.4.x: WPA: Failed to set GTK to the driver

2020-09-29 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

On the Surface Pro 4 with USB Marvell Bluetooth/WLAN device, upgrading
from Ubuntu 18.04 with Linux 4.15.x to Ubuntu 20.04 with Linux 5.4.x,
only WPA2 Enterprise networks stop working, but other continue to work.

WPA: Failed to set GTK to the driver (alg=2 keylen=32 keyidx=1)

Starting Ubuntu 20.04.1 with Linux 4.15.x, the problem is gone. Testing
Ubuntu’s Linux mainline builds [1], the problem is still there in
5.4.68, but gone in 5.5-rc1.

We do not have the resources to bisect this further, as the user needs
the device back now.

[1]: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: regression-release

** Attachment added: "Output of `ubuntu-bug --save /dev/shm/… 
linux-image-5.4.0-48-generic"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897745/+attachment/5415294/+files/20200929%E2%80%93linux-5.4.0-48%E2%80%93dmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897745

Title:
  Surface Pro 4 with Linux 5.4.x: WPA: Failed to set GTK to the driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1897745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897369] Re: apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Menzel
>From the manual page capabilities(7):

   CAP_SYS_NICE
  * Lower the process nice  value  (nice(2),  setpriority(2))  and
change the nice value for arbitrary processes;
  * set real-time scheduling policies for calling process, and set
scheduling policies and  priorities  for  arbitrary  processes
(sched_setscheduler(2), sched_setparam(2), sched_setattr(2));
  * set  CPU  affinity  for  arbitrary  processes (sched_setaffin‐
ity(2));
  * set I/O scheduling class and priority for arbitrary  processes
(ioprio_set(2));
  * apply  migrate_pages(2)  to arbitrary processes and allow pro‐
cesses to be migrated to arbitrary nodes;
  * apply move_pages(2) to arbitrary processes;
  * use the MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL flag with mbind(2) and move_pages(2)

No idea, if cups-browsed should be allowed to change the nice value of
*arbitrary* processes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897369

Title:
  apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1897369/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873764] Re: CUPS Apparmor Error opening /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Menzel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872564 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872564

The original report contains two issues, where only the second one is
fixed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1872564.

For the first audit messages for `cups-browsed`

[ 1769.505132] audit: type=1400 audit(1587372138.575:3011):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed"
pid=15230 comm="cups-browsed" capability=23 capname="sys_nice"

I created https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1897369.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873764

Title:
  CUPS Apparmor Error opening /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1873764/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897369] [NEW] apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

In Ubuntu 20.04.1 with *cups-browsed* 1.27.4-1, apparmor prevents
`/usr/sbin/cups-browsed` to change its nice value.

$ sudo dmesg | grep apparmor
[541870.509461] audit: type=1400 audit(1600898428.089:60): 
apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" 
pid=62030 comm="cups-browsed" capability=23  capname="sys_nice"
[628298.779668] audit: type=1400 audit(1600984854.115:61): 
apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" 
pid=66850 comm="cups-browsed" capability=23  capname="sys_nice"
[714667.424963] audit: type=1400 audit(1601071220.527:62): 
apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" 
pid=76828 comm="cups-browsed" capability=23  capname="sys_nice"

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897369

Title:
  apparmor: Allow cups-browsed to change nice value (CAP_SYS_NICE)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1897369/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1660316] Re: apparmor denial of CUPS

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Menzel
@skliarie, your pasted log message is actually a different issue, and I
just reported
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1897369 for it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660316

Title:
  apparmor denial of CUPS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1660316/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1882943] Re: Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

2020-09-18 Thread Paul Menzel
Am 18.09.20 um 13:55 schrieb Mirek Ingr:
> Okay, please find the attached journal.

Thank you. There it is:

 Sep 18 08:15:43 B4 kernel: DMI: Dell Inc. Latitude 5591/0DVVG1, 
BIOS 1.13.1 07/14/2020

 Sep 18 08:15:43 B4 kernel: microcode: sig=0x906ea, pf=0x20, 
revision=0xd6

So, it is the same microcode update version, that break back in June?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882943

Title:
  Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes
  silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1882943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1882943] Re: Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

2020-09-18 Thread Paul Menzel
Am 18.09.20 um 09:40 schrieb Mirek Ingr:
> Sure thing, here you are:
> $ grep -i microcode /proc/cpuinfo
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6
> microcode : 0xd6

Thank you.

> The output of 'dmesg' is attached as a file.

Ah. Your buffer is too small. As it’s a ring buffer, earlier messages 
get overridden. Either increase the size on the Linux command line with 
for example `log_buf_len=4M`, or, if the systemd journal is running, it 
should store all Linux kernel messages too:

 $ journalctl -k

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882943

Title:
  Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes
  silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1882943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1882943] Re: Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

2020-09-18 Thread Paul Menzel
Am 18.09.20 um 09:13 schrieb Mirek Ingr:
> $ dmesg | grep microcode
> 

Please attach the whole output.

> $ iucode-tool -Sv
> iucode-tool: system has processor(s) with signature 0x000906ea
> iucode-tool: assuming all processors have the same type, family and model
> 
> 
> $ lscpu
> Architecture:x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):  32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order:  Little Endian
> Address sizes:   39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> CPU(s):  12
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-11
> Thread(s) per core:  2
> Core(s) per socket:  6
> Socket(s):   1
> NUMA node(s):1
> Vendor ID:   GenuineIntel
> CPU family:  6
> Model:   158
> Model name:  Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8850H CPU @ 2.60GHz
> Stepping:10

[…]

Please also paste the output of `grep -i microcode /proc/cpuinfo`.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882943

Title:
  Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes
  silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1882943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1882943] Re: Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

2020-09-17 Thread Paul Menzel
@mirek-ingr, can you please attach the output of `dmesg` when running
the updated firmware?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882943

Title:
  Dell Latitude 5591, i7-8850H, sig=0x906ea/20200609, Boot freezes
  silently after 'intel-microcode' upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1882943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883065] Re: Dell Latitude/Precision, sig=0x806ec/20090609: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

2020-07-29 Thread Paul Menzel
It looks like microcode update revision 0xd6 is still the officially
shipped version.

The often occurring hangs without the power cable plugged in, are still
happening.

Booting with `maxcpus=1` and adding

earlyprintk=efi earlycon=efifb debug

to the Linux command, the last messages are:

[…]
random: crng done (trusting CPU's manufacturer)
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
printk: console [tty0] enabled
printk: bootconsole [efifb0] disabled

So, it might indeed be related to bug 1862751.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065

Title:
  Dell Latitude/Precision, sig=0x806ec/20090609: Linux hangs without
  plugged in power cable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1883065/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887959] Re: Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

2020-07-18 Thread Paul Menzel
Shouldn’t the metadata (Conflicts, Replaces, …) reflect that, so apt can
find an upgrade path?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887959

Title:
  Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1887959/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887959] Re: Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

2020-07-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Thank you for the quick response.

Yes, with that apt seems to be able to resolve the conflicts.

```
$ sudo apt install libqt5core5a
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
  libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5printsupport5 libqt5sql5 
libqt5svg5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5xml5
Suggested packages:
  qt5-image-formats-plugins qtwayland5
Recommended packages:
  qttranslations5-l10n qt5-gtk-platformtheme libqt5sql5-sqlite | 
libqt5sql5-mysql | libqt5sql5-odbc | libqt5sql5-psql | libqt5sql5-tds
  | libqt5sql5-ibase
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  automoc kdelibs-bin kdelibs5-dev kdoctools libattica0.4 libdbusmenu-qt2 
libkcmutils4 libkde3support4 libkdeclarative5 libkdecore5 libkdesu5
  libkdeui5 libkdewebkit5 libkdnssd4 libkemoticons4 libkfile4 libkhtml5 
libkidletime4 libkimproxy4 libkio5 libkjsapi4 libkjsembed4 libkmediaplayer4
  libknewstuff2-4 libknewstuff3-4 libknotifyconfig4 libkntlm4 libkparts4 
libkprintutils4 libkpty4 libkrosscore4 libkrossui4 libktexteditor4
  libkunitconversion4 libkutils4 libphonon-dev libphonon4 libplasma3 libqca2 
libqt4-dbus libqt4-declarative libqt4-designer libqt4-dev
  libqt4-dev-bin libqt4-help libqt4-network libqt4-opengl libqt4-qt3support 
libqt4-script libqt4-scripttools libqt4-sql libqt4-svg libqt4-test
  libqt4-xml libqt4-xmlpatterns libqtcore4 libqtdbus4 libqtgui4 libqtwebkit4 
libsolid4 libthreadweaver4 phonon-backend-null qdbus qt4-linguist-tools
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5printsupport5 
libqt5sql5 libqt5svg5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5xml5
9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 64 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 9,045 kB of archives.
After this operation, 207 MB disk space will be freed.
```

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887959

Title:
  Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1887959/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887959] [NEW] Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

2020-07-17 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

After upgrading from Ubuntu 19.10 (maybe 18.04) to 20.04, I am unable to
upgrade the packages below.

The following packages have been kept back:
  libboost-date-time-dev libboost-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libqt5core5a 
libqt5dbus5 libqt5gui5 libqt5network5 libqt5printsupport5 libqt5sql5
  libqt5svg5 libqt5widgets5 libqt5xml5

** Affects: qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887959

Title:
  Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1887959/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887959] Re: Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

2020-07-17 Thread Paul Menzel
```
$ apt list --upgradable
Listing... Done
libboost-date-time-dev/focal 1.71.0.0ubuntu2 ppc64el [upgradable from: 1.67.0.2]
libboost-dev/focal 1.71.0.0ubuntu2 ppc64el [upgradable from: 1.67.0.2]
libboost-filesystem-dev/focal 1.71.0.0ubuntu2 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
1.67.0.2]
libqt5core5a/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5dbus5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5gui5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5network5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5printsupport5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5sql5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5svg5/focal 5.12.8-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 5.12.4-1]
libqt5widgets5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
libqt5xml5/focal 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ppc64el [upgradable from: 
5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1]
```

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887959

Title:
  Unable to upgrade several qt5 packages (libqt5gui5, …)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1887959/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 313514] Re: MASTER: evdev driver ignores keycodes > 255

2020-07-02 Thread Paul Menzel
Is this still a problem with *xserver-xorg-input-libinput*, which
replaces *xserver-xorg-input-evdev*?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313514

Title:
  MASTER: evdev driver ignores keycodes > 255

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/313514/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 30562] Re: Acer € and $ + special laptop keys: outside supported X keycode range

2020-07-02 Thread Paul Menzel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 313514 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313514

If this still an issue, please check with the libinput tools.

sudo libinput debug-events

I got the currency keys working on the Acer TravelMate 5735Z [1].

[1]: 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xkeyboard-config/xkeyboard-config/-/commit/5ea031eb4998726dc5a00ba1fb2253b21cdbe366
 "Map `KEY_DOLLAR` and `KEY_EURO` to `dollar` and `EuroSign`"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30562

Title:
  Acer € and $ + special laptop keys: outside supported X keycode range

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian-goodies/+bug/30562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862751] Re: Hard lockups using microcode releases 20191115 on Intel Whiskey Lake

2020-06-12 Thread Paul Menzel
PS: The Linux command line parameter `dis_ucode_ldr` can be used to
disable applying microcode updates [1].

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/11/651

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862751

Title:
  Hard lockups using microcode releases 20191115 on Intel Whiskey Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1862751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862751] Re: Hard lockups using microcode releases 20191115 on Intel Whiskey Lake

2020-06-12 Thread Paul Menzel
Trying to find out, if bug #1883065 [1] is a duplicate of this one.

Is this a laptop? If yes, does having the power cable plugged in make a
difference?

Starting with `maxcpus=1` and then trying to bring more CPUs online, on
the Dell Precision 3540 with dedicated AMD graphics card, it always
hangs after one or two more CPUs when on battery. With the power cable,
it often works, but I saw it also failing. I reported the issue to the
Linux Kernel Mailing List *Intel laptop: Starting with `maxcpus=1` and
then bringing other CPUs online freezes system* [2].

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883065
[2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/11/474

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862751

Title:
  Hard lockups using microcode releases 20191115 on Intel Whiskey Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1862751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883065] Re: Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

2020-06-12 Thread Paul Menzel
[0.00] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xd6,
date = 2020-04-23

The system was given to a user, so I won’t be able to test.

Maybe this bug is about two issues.

1.  Sometimes boot failures (cold boot and from hibernate) with no power cable 
plugged in. (Yesteday, I wasn’t unable to reproduce it.)
2.  SMP(?) issues due to latest microcode updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065

Title:
  Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1883065/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883065] Re: Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

2020-06-11 Thread Paul Menzel
It might be related to the latest microcode updates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065

Title:
  Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883065/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883065] [NEW] Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

2020-06-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

Already present reported in project *dell-sputnik*. (Note, it happened
here also without suspend/resume.):

1.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1661741
2.  Quote from https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1661741/comments/26:

> A similar bug affects several Dell laptop models:
> - Dell 5480/5488 :
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1866343
> - Dell E5470 :
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1661741
> (Note that the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1661741 
is not fixed; it has been changed, by error, to fixed. Please, it will be nice 
if somebody can change the status to "confirmed")
> - Dell 7740 :
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1871491
>
> I suppose that the bug can also affect Dell precision 7730

After experiencing this already on the Dell Latitude 5480/5488
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1866343), we have seen
this now too with the Dell Precision 3540 (with dedicated AMD graphics
card).

Without the power cord plugged in, the system started fine, then
updating packages, including the Linux kernel, turning the system off,
and right back on, it went to GRUB, and GRUB was able to load Linux and
initrd, and starting Linux it hung.

Num lock key didn’t respond (but also didn’t blink – no idea if this
should work), and Ctrl + Alt + Del didn’t work either. So, the system
had to be powered off by pressing the power button for some (ten(?))
seconds.

Subsequent tries didn’t help, until we remembered the issues with the
other device, and plugging in the power cord fixed it.

With the power cable unplugged, it didn’t boot.

The state of the connected power cable only mattered, when starting the
Linux kernel. That means, plugging it in, when GRUB was active, the
system booted. Removing the cable, when GRUB was running, Linux hung.

I tried to get Linux messages, but `debug nomodeset earlyprintk=efi`
didn’t get Linux to output any messages.

### Workarounds ###

I was able to get Linux booting by adding either one of the following
Linux kernel parameters.

1.  `maxcpus=1` (once it started with `maxcpus=2`)
2.  `nosmp`
2.  `acpi=off`
3.  `nolapic`

In this state, there was only one CPU online. Trying to bring one more
online, the system always froze instantly.

echo 1 | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

(Nothing in pstore either.) (Where maxcpus=2` worked, we were able to
bring a third CPU online, but the system froze when trying the fourth.)

### Reproducibilty ###

Letting the system sit over night, and trying again in the morning,
unfortunately, we did *not* test without a power cable plugged in, as we
had an idea to test the non-USB-Type-C power cable. With that the system
started.

Powering the system off, and unplugging the cable, the system booted
without issues. So something changed.

We weren’t able to get it into a state, where it doesn’t boot in the
last hour, but we would like this investigated, as we are giving these
systems to our users.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete

** Attachment added: "Linux messages with `debug maxcpus=2`"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065/+attachment/5382816/+files/morley-maxcpus2.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883065

Title:
  Dell Latitude/Precision: Linux hangs without plugged in power cable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883065/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883019] Re: Dell Precision 3540: Starting with acpi=off does not power off

2020-06-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Here are the Linux messages.

** Attachment added: "Linux messages with `acpi=off debug` on the Linux command 
line"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883019/+attachment/5382802/+files/morley-acpi-off.txt

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883019

Title:
  Dell Precision 3540: Starting with acpi=off does not power off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883019/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883019] [NEW] Dell Precision 3540: Starting with acpi=off does not power off

2020-06-10 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

With Ubuntu 20.04 (and 18.04) Starting the Dell Precision with
`acpi=off` (to debug power cable issue) powering of the system, it halts
but does not power off.

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661741
[2]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1871491

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883019

Title:
  Dell Precision 3540: Starting with acpi=off does not power off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1883019/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1521173] Re: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

2020-06-07 Thread Paul Menzel
@piscvau, the original report is not about a crash, so your issue is
unrelated. Please create a separate report for the crash Ubuntu 20.04.
(Also mention there, if it is a system crash/hang? Does the numlock key
still work? Can you switch to a virtual console with Ctrl + Alt + F4?
Can you still ping the system in the network?) Good luck!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521173

Title:
  AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1521173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804591] Re: tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed

2020-05-28 Thread Paul Menzel
This is a common problem on AMD Zen systems.

Patches were posted to LKML (Linux Kernel Mailing List) in February
2019, but version 2 still needs to rewrite a comment, and v3 wasn’t
posted since then.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/14/1145

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804591

Title:
  tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1804591/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804589] Re: AMD-Vi write error

2020-05-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Just a note, on the Dell OptiPlex 5055 Ryzen CPU/0P03DX, BIOS 1.1.20
05/31/2019 (AGESA SummitPI-AM4 1.0.0.7a) I am only seeing the interrupt
warning. Performance counters are supported there.

[0.870894] pci :00:00.2: AMD-Vi: IOMMU performance counters 
supported
[0.871377] pci :00:00.2: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
[0.871732] pci :00:00.2: PCI INT A: not connected

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804589

Title:
  AMD-Vi write error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1804589/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804589] Re: AMD-Vi write error

2020-05-28 Thread Paul Menzel
I am also seeing this with current Linux (5.7-rc7) on an MSI B350M
MORTAR and a Dell OptiPlex 5055. Both are AMD Ryzen systems, so this
seems to affect all of those.

The IOMMU subsystem maintainer responded to report this issue to the
mainboard vendor, so they fix the firmware [1].

Everybody experiencing this, please contact the mainboard vendor to fix
this. I already did, and the more contact them, the higher it will rise
in their ticketing system.

[1]:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028925.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804589

Title:
  AMD-Vi write error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1804589/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804589] Re: AMD-Vi write error

2020-05-28 Thread Paul Menzel
It’d be great if Canonical also used their Dell and AMD contacts to get
this fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804589

Title:
  AMD-Vi write error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1804589/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1878972] [NEW] Package installation fails if TMPDIR is automounted directory

2020-05-15 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

The update from Ubuntu 19.04 to 19.10 *and* 19.10 to 20.04 failed with
the message (for 20.04 upgrade) below.

[…]
Unpacking autofs (5.1.6-2) over (5.1.5-1ubuntu1) ...
dpkg-deb: error: failed to read archive 
'/scratch/local/apt-dpkg-install-UI1Lh9/71-autofs_5.1.6-2_ppc64el.deb': No such 
file or directory
dpkg: error processing archive 
/scratch/local/apt-dpkg-install-UI1Lh9/71-autofs_5.1.6-2_ppc64el.deb (--unpack):
 dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2
update-rc.d: warning: start and stop actions are no longer supported; falling 
back to defaults
Preparing to unpack .../72-libattr1_1%3a2.4.48-5_ppc64el.deb ...
[…]

The reason seems to be that TMPDIR points to `/scratch/local` which is
automounted on our systems.

** Affects: autofs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878972

Title:
  Package installation fails if TMPDIR is automounted directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1878972/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1521173] Re: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

2020-05-06 Thread Paul Menzel
@magean, I believe you are having a different issue here, so please
create a separate bug report, and, as you reproduced this with Linux 5.4
(also try https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/), contact linux-
p...@vger.kernel.org and the PCI subsystem maintainers directly, and
attach `dmesg` to your message for starters.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521173

Title:
  AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1521173/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1651635] Re: XPS 13 9360 trackpad locks into scroll mode

2020-02-02 Thread Paul Menzel
@ads-launchpad, that looks like a separate issue. Please make a new
report (especially as this is in the project(?)/category(?) *dell-
sputnik* in Launchpad, and also upstream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651635

Title:
  XPS 13 9360 trackpad locks into scroll mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1651635/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856366] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

2020-01-18 Thread Paul Menzel
[Sorry, I wasn’t subscribed to the notifications.]

@hui.wang, your attached firmware, what version is that?

$ md5sum sof-icl.ri
2ca373e6254b0e9b37439f7a31984973  /dev/shm/sof-icl.ri

@adamfubuntu, do you still have the problem *without* `dsp_driver=0` on
an up-to-date Ubuntu 19.10 with Linux 5.5-rc6?

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1772498
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772498

** Bug watch added: github.com/thesofproject/sof/issues #2126
   https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/issues/2126

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856366

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1856366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856366] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

2020-01-18 Thread Paul Menzel
And in Clear Linux: https://community.clearlinux.org/t/new-installation-
no-sound-swift-5-i7-1065gt-iris-plus/2407/14

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856366

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1856366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856366] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

2020-01-18 Thread Paul Menzel
A Fedora user reported the same issue in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772498#c16, and the created
an upstream GitHub issue
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/issues/2126.

Please update the meta-information of this bug accordingly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856366

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected on a Swift SF314-57

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1856366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1738774] Re: Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on HiDPI/4K display

2020-01-18 Thread Paul Menzel
This is still an issue, and due to HiDPI getting more and more common,
Ubuntu should really look into this to give users a good experience with
the setups.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738774

Title:
  Pixeled icons with LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 on HiDPI/4K display

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1738774/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1488620] Re: Add LZ4 support to initramfs-tools

2020-01-18 Thread Paul Menzel
Can this be closed/tagged as fixed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1488620

Title:
  Add LZ4 support to initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1488620/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856366] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected

2019-12-14 Thread Paul Menzel
Off-topic: Adam, you should also install the other firmware files like
for graphics.

```
[1.029518] i915 :00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: 
olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
[1.029567] i915 :00:02.0: Direct firmware load for 
i915/icl_dmc_ver1_09.bin failed with error -2
[1.029569] i915 :00:02.0: Failed to load DMC firmware 
i915/icl_dmc_ver1_09.bin. Disabling runtime power management.
[1.029569] i915 :00:02.0: DMC firmware homepage: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915
```

`apt install linux-firmware` should fix that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856366

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1856366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1856366] Re: PCI/internal sound card not detected

2019-12-14 Thread Paul Menzel
It should work out of the box without the user having to specify any
options.

1.  There does not seem to be an Ubuntu package for Sound Open Firmware
yet. Adam, does the pre-built firmware file from
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/releases work? Linux 5.3, 5.4,
5.5-rc1?

2.  With the firmware file installed, does Linux 5.3 work with
`dsp_driver=0`? Please attach the Linux messages from the non-working
and working boot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856366

Title:
  PCI/internal sound card not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1856366/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845548] Re: implicitclass crashed with SIGABRT in __malloc_assert()

2019-10-01 Thread Paul Menzel
Upstream issue: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues/162

** Bug watch added: github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues #162
   https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups-filters/issues/162

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845548

Title:
  implicitclass crashed with SIGABRT in __malloc_assert()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1845548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845548] Re: implicitclass crashed with SIGABRT in __malloc_assert()

2019-10-01 Thread Paul Menzel
The same issues exists with cups-filters 1.25.6 in Debian Sid/unstable.

>From `/var/log/cups/error_log`:

```
D [01/Oct/2019:11:15:54 +0200] [Job 168] Removing cups-browsed-dest-printer 
option from argumentsmalloc.c:2389: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == 
initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && 
prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)\' 
failed.
D [01/Oct/2019:11:15:54 +0200] [Job 168] PID 14123 
(/usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftopdf) exited with no errors.
D [01/Oct/2019:11:15:54 +0200] [Job 168] PID 14124 
(/usr/lib/cups/backend/implicitclass) crashed on signal 6.
D [01/Oct/2019:11:15:54 +0200] [Job 168] Hint: Try setting the LogLevel to 
"debug" to find out more.
D [01/Oct/2019:11:15:54 +0200] [Job 168] Backend returned status -134 (crashed)
```

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845548

Title:
  implicitclass crashed with SIGABRT in __malloc_assert()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1845548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1651635] Re: XPS 13 9360 trackpad locks into scroll mode

2019-08-28 Thread Paul Menzel
@andre-miras, we do not experience the problem with Ubuntu 18.10(?) and
19.04 anymore. Please try to update, or test these releases. No idea,
what the cause and solution was in the end.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651635

Title:
  XPS 13 9360 trackpad locks into scroll mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1651635/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1784349] Re: SEGV during startup on Power 8 system

2019-04-26 Thread Paul Menzel
I tested this yesterday with Ubuntu 18.10, and Firefox did crash
anymore. So this can be tagged as solved. I do not know the first fixed
version though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784349

Title:
  SEGV during startup on Power 8 system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1784349/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-26 Thread Paul Menzel
On a ppc64le system I verified, that the version in cosmic-proposed 
fixes this issue.

A big thanks to everyone, fixing this so quickly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-25 Thread Paul Menzel
It worked with bionic-proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-25 Thread Paul Menzel
On 25.03.19 07:53, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> @Paul - you were so active before - thanks for checking the PPAs and
> all that. But I still have no NFS server uncoorperative enough to
> trigger this; Could you for the (final) SRU verification as asked on
> the comments #18 and #19 confirm that this works in your setup with
> the changes that are in proposed [1].

Aren’t they identical to the packages in your PPA? Anyway, I can test 
the proposed packages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-13 Thread Paul Menzel
I checked, that your packages fix the problem on both Bionic and Cosmic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-07 Thread Paul Menzel
@Paul - please test the PPA on Disco (19.04) [1] and let me know if it
works fine.

I just tested this. With autofs 5.1.2-4ubuntu1 it does *not* work, with
autofs 5.1.2-4ubuntu2~ppa1 it does work.

[1]: https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/bug-1818121-autofs-
nfs4.x

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Ubuntu Disco is 19.04, right? I’ll try to test this properly today.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Our NFS server is not a Ubuntu system. It’s basically an LFS based set-
up [1]. The autofs client installed on our system has no trouble
connecting to the server, so some minor detail seems to be different,
that it doesn’t work with the Ubuntu client out of the box.

[1]: https://github.molgen.mpg.de/mariux64

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-07 Thread Paul Menzel
Our NFS server does not advertise/support NFSv3 for example.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-04 Thread Paul Menzel
Thank you for trying to reproduce the issue, and sorry for missing out
information. In this case, due to NFS 4.2 issues, we have specified the
exact NFS version.

 joey -vers=4.0 claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey

Bisecting the fix in autofs 5.1.4, results in the commit aa1f4321
(autofs-5.1.3 - handle additional nfs versions in mount_nfs.c).

commit aa1f432180f3878c303088def8d647f1bd50b10b (refs/bisect/fixed)
Author: Ian Kent 
Date:   Thu Oct 19 08:48:44 2017 +0800

autofs-5.1.3 - handle additional nfs versions in mount_nfs.c

Since NFSv4 can now have a subversion it needs to be allowed for.

It's enough to check for an options string starting with "vers=4" or
"nfsvers=4" because it's used only to set a flag used for special
casing the availibility probe for any NFS version 4 version.

Signed-off-by: Ian Kent 

diff --git a/CHANGELOG b/CHANGELOG
index 2da2cdc..3a1e4a6 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG
+++ b/CHANGELOG
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ xx/xx/2017 autofs-5.1.4
 - make map source reference message debug only.
 - improve description of mount_nfs_default_protocol.
 - the port option should not behave like nobind option.
+- handle additional nfs versions in mount_nfs.c.

 24/05/2017 autofs-5.1.3
 ===
diff --git a/modules/mount_nfs.c b/modules/mount_nfs.c
index 5245d96..d3ebd92 100644
--- a/modules/mount_nfs.c
+++ b/modules/mount_nfs.c
@@ -147,8 +147,9 @@ int mount_mount(struct autofs_point *ap, const char *root, 
const char *name, int
} else if (_strncmp("use-weight-only", cp, o_len) == 0) 
{
flags |= MOUNT_FLAG_USE_WEIGHT_ONLY;
} else {
-   if (_strncmp("vers=4", cp, o_len) == 0 ||
-   _strncmp("nfsvers=4", cp, o_len) == 0)
+   /* Is any version of NFSv4 in the options */
+   if (_strncmp("vers=4", cp, 6) == 0 ||
+   _strncmp("nfsvers=4", cp, 9) == 0)
vers = NFS4_VERS_MASK | TCP_SUPPORTED;
else if (_strncmp("vers=3", cp, o_len) == 0 ||
 _strncmp("nfsvers=3", cp, o_len) == 0) 
{

Reading the commit message and looking at the change, it makes sense,
that this fixes the issue. Could you please apply this to the package?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] Re: NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-03-04 Thread Paul Menzel
** Summary changed:

- NFSv4 shares are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available
+ NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts 
available

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares with option `-vers=4.0` are not mounted: mount(nfs): no
  hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1818121] [NEW] NFSv4 shares are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

2019-02-28 Thread Paul Menzel
Public bug reported:

With Ubuntu 18.10 and autofs 5.1.2-4ubuntu1, mounting NFSv4 shares does
not work. Directly mounting them with `mount.nfs` works.

```
Feb 28 18:08:30 nfsclient automount[22978]: expire_proc: exp_proc = 
131147807650128 path /home_mariux
Feb 28 18:08:30 nfsclient automount[22978]: expire_cleanup: got thid 
131147807650128 path /home_mariux stat 0
Feb 28 18:08:30 nfsclient automount[22978]: expire_cleanup: sigchld: exp 
131147807650128 finished, switching from 2 to 1
Feb 28 18:08:30 nfsclient automount[22978]: st_ready: st_ready(): state = 2 
path /home_mariux
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: handle_packet: type = 3
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: handle_packet_missing_indirect: 
token 46, name joey, request pid 28647
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: attempting to mount entry 
/home_mariux/joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking 
up joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: lookup_mount: lookup(file): joey -> 
claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded 
entry: claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered 
options: nosuid
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: parse_mount: parse(sun): 
dequote("claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey") -> 
claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/bucz
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: parse_mount: parse(sun): core of 
entry: options=nosuid, loc=claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting 
root /home_mariux, mountpoint joey, what 
claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey, f
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: mount_mount: mount(nfs): 
root=/home_mariux name=joey what=claptrap:/amd/claptrap/2/home/edv/joey, 
fstype=nfs, opti
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: mount_mount: mount(nfs): nfs 
options="nosuid", nobind=0, nosymlink=0, ro=0
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: get_nfs_info: called with host 
claptrap(141.14.16.132) proto 6 version 0x30
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: get_nfs_info: called with host 
claptrap(141.14.16.132) proto 17 version 0x30
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: mount(nfs): no hosts available
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: dev_ioctl_send_fail: token = 46
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: failed to mount /home_mariux/joey
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: st_readmap: state 1 path 
/home_mariux
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: handle_packet: type = 3
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: handle_packet_missing_indirect: 
token 47, name joey, request pid 28647
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: dev_ioctl_send_fail: token = 47
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: re-reading map for /home_mariux
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: lookup_nss_read_map: reading map 
file /etc/automount/auto.home
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: do_init: parse(sun): init gathered 
global options: nosuid
Feb 28 18:08:32 nfsclient automount[22978]: st_ready: st_ready(): state = 4 
path /home_mariux
```

** Affects: autofs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818121

Title:
  NFSv4 shares are not mounted: mount(nfs): no hosts available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1818121/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   >